W912PQ19R9000_0005.pdf

F9E7CE43134A002

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

A. This amendment is issued to add CLIN 0006, provide Request for Information 98 to 126, adding Commissioning specif ications, and adding Electric Traction Passanger Elevators specifications.

B. Proposal due date is changed from June 14, 2019 to June 19, 2019 at 3:00PM EST.

C. All FAR provisions and clauses remain unchanged and in full force.

D. As in all of the amendments this amendment must be acknow ledged, see Block 11 above.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 8

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 12-Jun-2019

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street , County, State and Zip Code) X W912PQ19R9000

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

30-Apr-2019

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

12-Jun-2019

CODE

106 NEW YORK AIR NATIONAL GUARD

106 MSG/MSC - WAWF W912PQ

150 RIVERHEAD ROAD

WESTHAMPTON BEACH NY 11978-1201

W912PQ 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W912PQ19R9000

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following have been added by full text:

REQUEST FOR INFOMATION 97-126

Q98. A-601 Door Schedule calls for a total of 11 interior doors to be blast resistant (Note R6). 8 of these 11 are called out as wood (SCW). We do not know of any manufacturer of blast resistant wood doors, and whether this is even possible. Please advise whether these interior doors are to be blast rated, and whether they should be wood or steel.

A98 – Doors to be blast resistant are: 101A, 107B, 109B, 113, 110, 118, 119, 123, 124A, 126A, 126B, 126C, 130B, 131B and 221B. Disregard note R6 on all other doors.

Q99. Also, the two interior entrance stair doors on the first floor are blast rated(109A/130A), and only one (213) of the two on the second floor are blast rated.

Is this correct?

A99 – See answer to 98.

Q100. On S-001, General Structural Note 8.3 states to " refer to the Geotech Report for removal of unsatisfactory material under footings, slabs, and foundations and for the backfilling, compaction, and testing of the satisfactory material to replace it."

Geotech Report provided in Amendment 0003, Executive Summary states, "We recommend removal of the existing uncontrolled fill from the proposed building area and replacement with structural fill. Based on the available topographic information, we estimate that native subgrade soils will be between +43 and +46."

The next bullet point in the Executive Summary states, "we anticipate that the soils excavated on-site will be suitable for re-use as structural fill."

The Geotech Report makes recommendations; it does not make declarations of what/where to remove soil. The soil removal of the building footprint is a large quantity. The range provided of where native soils will be found in the building footprint of +43 to +46 is 1800cy. +50 is the existing elevation on the topo plan as well as the final floor slab elevation. Removal of the soil from +50 to +46 would be an additional 2400cy. We are talking about the removal and replacement of a large quantity of soil, where we feel it is vague on how much and where to remove.

1) Is all the soil from +43 to +SO within the building footprint considered unsuitable?

2) Is it the government's intent to remove all the soil from +43 to +50?

3) We are requesting a separate Bid line item (Base Bid) as per below.

Description Est. Qty. CY Unit Price Total

Remove/Dispose/Replace Unsuitable soil 500

A100.1 – No. Based on the 6 borings (B1 to B-6) performed within or near the proposed building, the strata identified on the individual boring logs as ‘Fill’ is the ‘unsuitable’ material in question. The contractors shall assume 5 feet of soil below existing grade across the entire footprint of the building and utility yard shall be excavated, disposed, and replaced with structural fill. A qualified geotechnical testing agency, with oversight from a licensed geotechnical engineer, shall be engaged by the contractor to make final determinations of the unsuitable soil limits.

A100.2 – No, just the ‘Fill’ materials. The native (SP) soils between +43 and +50 may remain.

A100.3 –CLIN 0006 will be added and contractors shall provide a cost for soil excavation, disposal, and replacement with structural fill; totaling 3,800 CYs. The cost ($/CY) shall be used as a credit back to the government if less soil is needed to be replaced, or a change order if more soil is needed to be replaced

Q101. Drawing ES-101 has a note ES18 at Bldg. 250. Note ES18 states to extend from Manhole A, 50 Pair copper and 1-24SM/12MM. Is there already a conduit from the Note ES18 to Manhole A, or does a pathway need to be excavated in the ground for this work?

A101 – Existing conduit to Building 250 should be used.

Q102. Note ES14 at existing MHA states to extend to MHB and into SF&CF bl dg. To accomplish this work, are we to use the existing 6W4" ductbank called out for Note ES13?

A102 – Use the existing 6W4" ductbank called out for Note ES13 to extend telecommunications cabling in Note ES14 at existing MHA to MHB and then into SF&CF bldg.

Q103. I could use more info for the T3 Line and T1 Line described in Key Note ES15 on Drawing ES-

101. Specifically, exactly what type of cable do they want for these?

A103 – Coordinate with Verizon the type of cable for T3 and T1.

Q104. Answers to Q4 & Q32 are not clear, please confirm that government shall hire a third-party commissioning agent who will perform commissioning. Please provide specification for commissioning and detail each party role in the commissioning process.

A104 – The contractor will work in conjunction with the government provided commissioning agent. See attached Specifications.

Q105. Please confirm that government would provide the project CAD drawing to the contractor free of charge to use in various trades shop drawings preparation.

A105 – There is not a charge to the contractor for the CAD files. The Contractor will have to sign a disclaimer form prior to receiving.

Q106. Government response to Q45 needs further clarification:

a. Please confirm that contractor is to remove ±5ft deep of existing soil beneath building footings.

b. Please confirm that contractor is to remove ±5ft deep of existing soil beneath building slab on grade

c. Please confirm that contractor is to remove ±5ft deep of existing soil beneath utility yard slab on grade

d. Please confirm that contractor to remove ±5ft deep of existing soil beneath new pavement

e. Please confirm that contractor to remove ±5ft deep of existing soil beneath parking lot option.

f. Please confirm that contractor to remove ±5ft deep of existing soil beneath all side walks

A106a – See response to question 100 A106b – See response to question 100 A106c – See response to question 100 A106d – See paragraph 4.5.2 Subgrade Preparation and Protection in geotechnical report. The suggestion is 1 foot below proposed pavement section.

A106e – See paragraph 4.5.2 Subgrade Preparation and Protection in geotechnical report. The suggestion is 1 foot below pavement section.

Q107. Answer to Q53 is confusing, please advise if the awarded prime contractor and his subcontractors would pay NY state sales tax for products installed on this project or not? If the answer is no, please clarify how the contractor would be able to attain tax exemption status.

A107. The 106th Rescue Wing of the National Guard is federal facility that maintains a tax-exempt status with the State of New York for the purchase made by the 106th Rescue Wing.

You would need to contact the New York State Department of Taxation and Finance at (518) 485-2889 to find out your company’s status concerning New York State Sales Tax for a federal project.

Q108. Answer to Q72 is not clear, please clarify if the corner guards are required at all outside corners of the building or only at the columns marked with key note A6. Also, the answer is stating height to be 12’, however newly provided specs call for 6’ high.

A108 – Corner guards at 6’ height is acceptable. A-101 Keynote A15 indicates where corner guards are required. Keynote A6 is not applicable to this question.

Q109. Answer to Q57 is not clear, please advise if we are to use the existing underground conduits or are we to run new conduits using directional boring per added 3.7.7.2. Also clarify if the primary cabling is to be installed by the electrical contractor or by the utility company on base (hired by the GC), please provide contact for the electrical utility company.

A109 – There are 4-6inch conduits under the street only, the orange inner duct indicates the location.

The contractor will tie into this duct to complete the runs as indicated. New concrete encased ductbanks on each side of the street as stated in Note ES2. General Contractor to provide and install primary cabling and terminations. Utility is Base Owned.

Q110. Please advise what’s the insulation R value on both high and low roofs?

A110 – Insulation R value for all roofs to be R-35 minimum.

Q111. What is the finish of the wood doors? Para 2.4.6.2 of SECTION 08 14 00 is referring to us to Interior drawings which doesn’t have such information. Please clarify if it would be Custom Stain as chosen by architect or a standard factory stain colors?

A111 – Stain color will be selected from the standard selection of stains provided by the door manufacturer. No custom stains.

Q112. R6 in the remarks column calls for ATFP compliant doors. However, this designation is called out on Wood Doors 128, 129, 130A, 131A, 213, 216, 217, 218, 233 & 234. Please clarify.

A112 – See response to question 98

Q113. Hollow Metal Door Spec references the ATFP Blast Resistant Doors but the following information is missing. What is the blast rating? What is the Design Standoff distance? What is the blast load? We need such information for door 107B, 109A, 109B, 113, 118, 119, 124A, 126C, 130B, 131B & 221B.

A113 – The blast design criteria is indicated in Note K on sheet S-002.

Q114. On drawing A-102, the partitions between rooms 207, 208, 209, 210 & 211 is called out as Type J, please clarify.

A114 – Disregard partition type callout for those rooms. Per keynote A5 all those partitions for those rooms shown dashed to be demountable partitions.

Q115. Please define what is the finish on the demountable walls; “DM-1 DEMOUNTABLE WALL, FINISH”

A115 – Fabric to be Grade 1

Q116. Please define what is the finish on the folding partitions; “FAB-1 FOLDING PARTITION FABRIC”

A116 – Panel Fabric to be Grade A

Q117. Per drawing I-602, demountable partitions are by the government. There is also a spec section for Demountable Partitions, section 10 22 19. Please confirm if the partitions are by government.

If they are by contractor, please advise finish of the panels.

A117 - The demountable partitions are part of the contract and shall be purchased and installed by the contractor. The systems furniture is not part of the contract and will be government furnished and government installed. The General Contractor will need to coordinate with the government’s systems furniture contractor for installation of the furniture.

Q118. With regard to drawing ES-101 the key note ES18 tells us to extend from manhole A 50 pair copper & 1-24SM/12MM. Please advise where we are running these cables to and is there a pathway existing.

A118 - Existing conduit to Building 250 should be used.

Q119. Please provide the location of the Generator load bank connection cabinet.

A119 – The location of the Generator Load bank will be on the exterior of the enclosure of the PMT and generator, closest to the Generator.

Q120. Answer to Q92 is not clear, on drawing ES-101 the key note ES18 tells us to extend from manhole A 50 pair copper & 1-24SM/12MM. Please advise where in Bldg 250 to run the cables, also advise if we are to use an existing pathway or we are to run new pathway.

A120- See Response to Q118

Q121. Answer to Q 43 didn’t identify location of the load bank, please identify the location of the load bank connection cabinet.

A121 – See Response to Q119

Q122. The basis of design (Knotwood LLC.) for the slat screen wall, would not be able to meet specification 07 42 15 requirements for the warranty on paragraph 1.7.1, please confirm that the standard manufacturer warranty would be acceptable.

A122 – Manufacturer’s standard Limited Lifetime Warranty Is acceptable.

Q123. Please advise if it’s acceptable to use a hydraulic Schindler elevator that would require a machine room.

A123 – No.

Q124. Please advise if it’s acceptable to use a non-hydraulic Schindler machine-roomless elevator that’s rated for 3500lb.

A124 – The design intent is to have a machine room less elevator. A electric traction elevator is an acceptable alternative to the original design. Government concurs 3500 lbs will be satisfactory for either style for the lift capacity. Please see specification for electric traction passenger elevator.

Q125- We are in receipt of amendment 3 and find revised specifications with the amendment. There is no mention of the changes to the specification in the amendment. Can the government please advise what changes have been made to the specifications?

A125- The following specifications were added or modified:

10 11 00 09 67 23.13 10 26 00 33 71 02 11 81 29

Q126- The solicitation section 2.4.2.3.1 states Provide Construction Schedule in a Gantt chart that shows the complete project schedule from Notice to Proceed date of 11 September 2019.

Whereas the amendment 3 states that the projected award date is 10 September 2019 & the NTP date will be, after receiving the bonds (normally within 10 days after award). As per the Amendment 3 the NTP will be 10 days after September 10th 2019. Does the Amendment supersede the solicitation? If no clarification is provided for the same, we will follow the information provided in the Amendment 3 for the schedule submission as a part of technical proposal.

A126- Use the date indicated in section 2.4.2.3.1 as this will be utilized for evaluation purposes. The awardee can adjust this document after award since the projected award date and the NTP are not firm dates.

SECTION 00010 - SOLICITATION CONTRACT FORM

The required response date/time has changed from 14-Jun-2019 03:00 PM to 19-Jun-

2019 03:00 PM.

CLIN 0006 is added as follows:

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

0006 Lot Soil Excavation, dispose and replacement

FFP

Soil excavation, disposal, and replacement with structural fill; totaling 3,800 cubic yards (3,800 cubic yards equals 1 lot).

FOB: Destination

PSC CD: Y1AA

NET AMT

DELIVERIES AND PERFORMANCE

The following Delivery Schedule for CLIN 0006 has been added:

DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /

CAGE

POP 11-SEP-2019 TO

11-JAN-2021

N/A FA6325 - 106 CES

SMSGT JAMES NIZZA (631) 723-7330

150 RIVERHEAD ROAD

BLDG. 250, BASE SUPPLY RECEIVING

FRANCIS S. GABRESKI AIRPORT (ANG)

WESTHAMPTON BEACH NY 11978-1201

631-723-7440 FOB: Destination

FA6325

INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE

The following Acceptance/Inspection Schedule was added for CLIN 0006:

INSPECT AT INSPECT BY ACCEPT AT ACCEPT BY

Destination Government Destination Government

(End of Summary of Changes)