B150_Q_&_A_as_of_10_Jul_17.pdf

PDF 103 KB Posted

Attached to
F-35 Alter Bldg 150 MX Hangar Power and Inst. Equip All Spots
Solicitation number
W912LN-17-B-1001
Issued by

About this file

B150 Q & A as of 10 Jul 17

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Bid_Abstract_of_Offers_W912LN-17-B-1001_Corrected_16_Aug_17.pdf PDF
Bid_Abstract_of_Offers_W912LN-17-B-1001.pdf PDF
Bid_Open_Attendance_Sheet.pdf PDF
B150_Amendment_002_Drawings_July2017.pdf PDF
Amendment_0002_Specifications_03_35_43.pdf PDF
B_150_Amendment_0002.pdf PDF
Question_88_-_Reference_OMG_Edge_Box_product_Data.pdf PDF
B150_Q_&_A_FINAL_24_Jul_17.pdf PDF
Question_88_-_Reference_OMG_Edge_Box.pdf PDF
Wage_Determination_Mod_01.pdf PDF
B150_Q_&_A_as_of_20_Jul_17.pdf PDF
Question_56_-_Reference_100_AMP_CART.pdf PDF
Question_36_-_Reference_Eco-CEP_Epoxy_Primer.pdf PDF
Question_42_-_Reference_A651_Sketch_For_Window_Sill_RFI.pdf PDF
B150_Q_&_A_as_of_18_Jul_17.pdf PDF
Question_59_-_Reference_SD-100_Slab_Areas_Outside_Hanger_Bay.pdf PDF
Question_36_-_Reference__Eco-HPS_100_Urethane_Topcoat.pdf PDF
Question_54_-_Reference_Bldg_150_Sprinker_Spec.pdf PDF
B150_Q_&_A_as_of_14_Jul_17.pdf PDF
Question_30_-_Reference_Sketch_EG101.pdf PDF
Question_60_-_Reference_SD-100_Slab_Areas_Outside_Hanger_Bay.pdf PDF
B150_Q_&_A_as_of_12_Jul_17.pdf PDF
B150_Amendment_0001_Drawings.pdf PDF
B_150_Amendment_0001.pdf PDF
B150_Amendment_0001_-_26_41_00.pdf PDF
B150_Q_&_A_as_of_11_Jul_17.pdf PDF
Pre_Bid_Attendance_Sheet.pdf PDF
Pre-Bid_Conference_Minutes_B150.pdf PDF
B-150_Pre-Bid.pdf PDF
F-35_Alter_Bldg_150_MX_B-3_Final_Specs_Vol_2_Apr2017.pdf PDF
F-35_Alter_Bldg_150_MX_B-3_Final_Specs_Vol_1_Apr2017.pdf PDF
W912LN-17-B-1001.pdf PDF
F-35_Alter_Bldg_150_MX_B-3_Final_DWGs_B150_Apr2017.pdf PDF
Show all 33

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

W912LN-17-B-1001

F-35 ALTER BLDG 150 MX HANGAR POWER AND INST. EQUIPMENT ALL SPOTS

CURZ152802

QUESTIONS and ANSWERS

As of 10 Jul 17

1. Question: Is the following an acceptable substitution on this project - GE ELEMAX 2600

AWB system can meet the specification requirements and could be an alternate to the Grace, Perm-A-Barrier VP currently listed in the specifications.

Answer – GE ELEMAX 2600 AWB system is an acceptable alternate to Grace, Perm-A- Barrier VP.

2. Question: Please see attached substitution request for the hand dryers on the above project. I would appreciate consideration as an equal substitution. Our Dualflow Plus comes with a removable water-collecting tank for excess water that helps prevent spills on the floor and is also more cost-effective.

Answer – Dualflow Plus M14ACS-UL is an acceptable product for hand dryers.

3. Question: I came across this project and saw the below notation on the electrical drawing (E- 601-C) regarding the generator. Is it an existing generator or will you be procuring a new generator outside of the scope of this contract?

Answer – The generator is not part of the project. It will be owner furnished and owner installed.

4. Question: Mfg names for basis of design are listed in the specifications for the boiler, humidifier, ATC, and the VFD,s. However, no basis is listed for RTU, CRAC, VAV, MAU, fans and pumps. One item in particular, the basis of design, is seriously missing for the "preconditioned air system" (aka CAS). Since the CAS is special equipment this mfg if proprietary (or if not at least 3 names) needs to be provided. Please provide quickly in order for the equipment reps to be aware of this project.

Answer – For products that a basis of design manufacturer has not been provided, the contractor shall provide equipment that meets the equipment project specifications.

5. Question: On the bid form, line item 0006 Option #3 Compressed Air Systems has three parts. Is line item 0006 the total of lines 0006AA, 0006AB and 0006AC?

Answer – CLIN 0006 is comprised of three sub-elements 0006AA, 0006AB, and 0006AC.

Contractors only need to provide pricing information for each sub element, not a total price for CLIN 0006.

6. Question: Who provides the builders risk insurance for this project? If it's provided by the owner what is the deductible amount?

Answer – There is no builders risk insurance required on this project.

7. Question: Who carries the cost for asbestos abatement?

Answer – The Contractor is responsible for asbestos abatement costs.

8. Question: Spec section 01 45 00.00 10 Quality Control, calls for us to have full time employees as noted in the matrix on page 5. Please clarify how many of these people listed need to be employed by the general contractor for this project?

Answer – As part of the CQC organization, the contractor shall provide specialized personnel to assist the CQX Manager for the following areas: Electrical, Mechanical, Structural, Architectural, Materials Technician, and Submittal Clerk. Refer to Specification 01 45 00.00 10 Paragraph 3.4.3 for additional information.

9. Question: Who pays for the sitework compaction testing, concrete testing and other field testing?

Answer – The Contractor is responsible for all costs associated with required sitework, concrete, and field testing.

10. Question: I would like to formally request a bid extension of at least one week due to the July

Fourth holiday.

Answer – The government is strongly considering a bid extension. Exact length of time will be formalized in Amendment 0001.

11. Question: The product specified for the curtainwall is not a blast product it is a standard curtainwall double thermal product but will not meet blast requirements. Can we quote you the curtainwall that will meet the blast requirements instead?

Answer – Curtain wall system shall be equivalent to YKK 300 OG Hurricane Impact and Blast Mitigation Curtain Wall System.

12. Question: SECTION 00010 NOTES; Item No. 13. Is the Contractor Manpower Reporting in addition to OR in replacement of submitting the U.S. Department of Labor OMB No. 1215- 0149 form reporting for certified payrolls?

Answer – Contractor Manpower Reporting is in addition to Department of Labor payroll requirements.

13. Question: SECTION 00010 NOTES; Item No. 13: Is the Contractor Manpower Reporting organized by FSC code? In other words, hours and their dollar values are reported by FSC code versus by day as is reported on the OMB No. 1215-0149 WHD form currently?

Answer – Contractor Manpower Reporting is organized by FSC code. The government will provide the FSC code for this project. Reporting period will be the period of performance not to exceed 12 months ending September 30 of each government fiscal year and must be reported by 31 October of each calendar year. Contractor must report Direct Labor Hours on the project and Direct Labor Cost on the project.

14. Question: Invoicing and Payment: Does the owner have set retainage requirements for the project?

Answer – See FAR Clause 52.232-5 (e) for details. In general, Contracting Officer shall authorize monthly progress payments in full as long as the Contractor is making satisfactory progress.

15. Question: BID OPTION #2 / AFI #2 is described as being comprised of three (3) equal converters but Drawing E-402 shows elevations for five (5) positions, ie five equal converters. Shall we include quantity of three (3) or quantity of five (5) in the bid option?

Answer – There are five (5) equal converters in this project. The solicitation BID OPTION #2 will be officially corrected by Addendum to reflect the correct number of converters..

16. Question: What length of 270 volt dc power cable should be provided in the cable reels shown on Drawing E-402?

Answer – Provide 60ft cables for Aircraft Positions 1, 2, and 4. Provide 70ft cables for Aircraft positions 3 and 5.

17. Question: I did not see any specification describing the operating requirements for the 270 volt dc reels shown on Drawing E-402.

a - Are these to be motorized or manual cable reels?

Answer – The reels shall be motorized.

b - Are these to be enclosed or can they be provided without an enclosure?

Answer – Reels can be provided without an enclosure.

c - If these are motorized can they be manual feed and motorized retrieval?

Answer – Reels shall be motorized for both the feed and retrieval.

18. Question: Would the government be acceptable to changing Specification 26 35 44 Paragraph 2.21.9 enclosure rating from NEMA 12K to read NEMA 4. Most military aircraft hangars operate a deluge system that can hazard equipment. NEMA 4 offers a higher degree of protection than NEMA 12K with respect to expanding foam.

Answer – NEMA 4 Enclosure will not be required.

19. Question: Section 23 00 99: Aircraft, Preconditioned Air Units, Piping, and Accessories:

1.3.2 Performance Requirements

Mass airflow rate or pounds per minutes is specified at 46.5 (+/- 1). The variation allowance of +/- 1 is a very tight tolerance to hold. Our unit produces a minimum of 45 pounds per minute, but variations over 46 may be seen. May our standard aircraft preconditioned air unit’s PPM variations be accepted?

Answer – Mass airflow rates above 46.5 are acceptable.

20. Question: Section 23 00 99: Aircraft, Preconditioned Air Units, Piping, and Accessories:

2.6.3 Preconditioned Air Flexible Hose

Color is specified as yellow for the flexible duct. May olive drab color be accepted also?

Answer – Olive drab is an acceptable color.

21. Question: Spec section 32 92 23 calls for sodding. Is sod required on this project? If so, what areas receive sod?

Answer – All vegetated areas disturbed during construction shall be re-vegetated with sod.

22. Question: I have seen LEED referenced in the specification. Is this a LEED project? If so, what level of LEED is it?

Answer – This is not a LEED project. LEED references in project specifications will be deleted by Addendum.

23. Question: An aluminum screen wall is called for on A202. The product is Ametco Venetian

Line. Is there a specification for this material? What is the finish on this material? Please clarify.

Answer – Screen louvers to be welded V-shaped extruded aluminum main bars 2.625" centers with extruded aluminum framing bars, vertically installed. Screen louvers to be polyester power coated after fabrication, color dark bronze.

24. Question: The vertical lift hangar door upgrades requires us to work closely with the hangar door manufacture. Please provide a hangar door manufacture name and contact information.

Answer – Contacts listed below.

Kitty Duckett: Kitty.duckett@assaabloy.com Zach Kearney: Zach.kearney@assaabloy.com

ASSA ABLOY Entrance Systems Office: 678-782-4781 Fax: 770-631-5721 PO BOX 2957 - 350 Dividend Drive Peachtree City, Georgia 30269

25. Question: Drawings CD 101 and CS 400 show two large portions of slab removal and replacement. Drawings SD100 and S-100 don’t show these areas of slab being replaced.

Please clarify.

Answer – Pending

26. Question: Drawings CD101 and SD100 show tension ties for the roof trusses. Are these ties with-in the slab or under it? If in the slab, where are they located with-in the slab?

27. Question: On CD101 it shows us cutting and removing the slab in two areas. It also shows the tension ties running through this area at column lines N through T . If the tension ties are in the slab do we remove the concrete by hand from around them or leave strips of concrete in the crossed hatched areas as shown and pour the new 11” thick slab against them?

28. Question: Drawings SD100 shows removal of slab areas outside of the hangar bay. What is the slab thickness in these areas?

29. Question: Where it shows us removing the trench drain along column line N on SD100, will this require us to remove any angles used to support this trench drain cover?

30. Question: The grounding as shown on EG101 isn’t clear as to what is existing and what is proposed as new. Please see the attached sketch and clarify what is new and what is existing with-in the clouded area. Will additional concrete slab removal be required over and above what is shown on CD101 to install the grounding as shown on EG101?

EG101 Sketch For Grounding RFI.pdf

31. Question: Please provide a “basis of design” manufacture for the rigid rail fall protection systems as called for in spec section 11 01 50.

32. Question: Please provide a “basis of design” manufacture for the barrier gate operator as called for in spec section 32 31 13.

33. Question: Please provide a “basis of design” manufacture for the monorail hoists as called for in spec section 41 22 23.19.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .