W912ER18R0004-0004.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

Refer to the SF30 Block 14 Continuation Page

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

1 7

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 04-Apr-2018

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W912ER18R0004

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

27-Mar-2018

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

04-Apr-2018

CODE

US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS-CETAM-CT

MIDDLE EAST DISTRICT, CETAM-CT

PO BOX 2250

WINCHESTER VA 22604-1450

W912ER 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W912ER18R0004

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following items are applicable to this modification:

CONTINUATION PAGE

This amendment is issued to revise the following:

1. Specifications: Revised sections are replaced in their entirety. Revisions to the specification pages are shown on the pages in the following manner: New text is underlined and deleted text is shown using strikeout. The amendment number appears in the bottom margin on all pages of the new or revised sections.

The following have been revised:

Section 01 80 00.12 10 Paragraph 2.11.2.1 – page 9 Paragraph 4 – page 18 Attachment G – Added in its entirety Attachment H – Added in its entirety

Section 07 21 13 Paragraph 2.1.1 – page 6 Paragraph 2.1.2 – page 6

Section 08 51 13 Paragraph 1.11.2.1 – page 8

Section 08 71 00 Paragraph 3.5 – pages 14 thru 18

2. Drawing: Revisions to the following drawing are identified by a triangle placed on the drawing near each revision and a "cloud" drawn around both the triangle and change.

Fire Pump House (Facility I) – G-012

3. Solicitation: The Factor 1 (MANAGEMENT / TECHNICAL APPROACH) information located on pages 18 – 22 in section 00 21 00 is revised. Revisions are shown on the pages in the following manner: New text is underlined and deleted text is shown using strikeout.

The following has been revised:

FACTOR 1: MANAGEMENT / TECHNICAL APPROACH

Offerors shall submit the following for Factor 1:

Factor 1: Management/Technical Approach - The Offeror shall submit a proposed preliminary Gantt chart schedule and schedule narrative. For the schedule narrative, an offeror shall provide a narrative, not to exceed ten (10) pages (double sided) in length. The ten page limitation excludes Resumes, Letters of Commitment from Key Management Staff the Prime Contractor proposes in positions, and Organizational Charts. Any pages beyond the ten page limitation will not be evaluated.

The Offeror shall provide a preliminary level schedule from award to contract completion.

Describe in narrative detail the specific actions, key milestones, country specific requirements, processes, procedures and contractual requirements that the Offeror will perform after award, in accordance with the proposed schedule, and prior to start of construction start in order to meet the stated period of performance. The schedule should be in the form of a time scaled network diagram Critical Path Method (CPM) Schedule. The length of the schedule should be in compliance with the stated Period of Performance. The project schedule should contain a sufficient amount of activities and key milestones which demonstrate an understanding of the project scope. Provide information on your team’s approach to procure, ship and deliver long-lead items. Provide information regarding manufacturer ordering, transportation times and special instructions, customs, erection times, etc.

The Offeror shall provide a preliminary level schedule from award to contract completion.

Describe in narrative detail the specific actions, key milestones, country specific requirements, processes, procedures and contractual requirements that the Offeror will perform after award, in accordance with the proposed schedule, and prior to start of construction start in order to meet the stated period of performance.

The narrative for this factor, inclusive of all elements, shall not exceed ten (10) pages (double sided) in length. The ten page limitation excludes Resumes, Letters of Commitment from Key Management Staff the Prime Contractor proposes in positions, and Organizational Charts. Any pages beyond the ten page limitation will not be evaluated.

The narrative shall specifically address the following elements:

Element 1 - Schedule: The Offeror shall submit a proposed preliminary Gantt chart schedule and schedule narrative.

The schedule should be in the form of a time scaled network diagram Critical Path Method (CPM) Schedule. The length of the schedule should be in compliance with the stated Period of Performance. The project schedule should contain a sufficient amount of activities and key milestones which demonstrate an understanding of the project scope. Provide information on your team's approach to procure, ship and deliver long- lead items. Provide information regarding manufacturer ordering, transportation times and special instructions, customs, erection times, etc.

Element 1 2 - Jordan Business License: An offeror shall include, with its narrative, proof of current Jordan business licensure in the offeror’s name, or alternatively, the offeror’s supported plan to obtain a Jordan business license. Offeror shall provide documentary evidence and any necessary narrative to prove that they are currently registered, licensed, and legally permitted to perform construction work in Jordan.

Element 2 3 - Base Access and Security Requirements: An offeror shall explain how it will comply with security requirements to base access at Muwaffaq Salti Air Base in Jordan.

The narrative shall also describe the offeror’s plan to control access to the work site and for obtaining base access and security requirements for its personnel, subcontractors, and its construction materials and equipment. Offerors must address CENTCOM Clause

5152.225.5916 Mandatory Eligibility for Installation Access and how they will comply if awarded a contract, during the entire contract period of performance to include any warranty period, for installation access to a U.S. and/or host country installation, Offerors shall address in their plan how they are to meet the force protection escort requirements, i.e., be US Citizens and hold current US SECRET clearance. Reference Section 01 14 00 Work Restrictions, paragraph 1.4 of the specifications.

Element 3 4 - Organization: An offeror shall describe the process it plans to use to manage the project. The offeror shall discuss its proposed project organization, defining the roles, responsibilities, and authority to be delegated to its team. This includes the identification and description of who will perform the major or critical aspects of construction. The offeror shall include an organizational chart depicting the relationship between the offeror’s home office, field office, major subcontractor(s), QC personnel, safety personnel, and USACE. If applicable, the offeror shall clearly state the roles of any JV partners and major subcontractors in its discussion. Offerors shall include a firm, unequivocal letter of commitment signed by each of its major subcontractor(s) in its proposal submission. A major subcontractor is defined as a subcontractor who performs twenty percent (20%) or more of the total on-site management and construction efforts or those performing 20% or more of the total dollar value of the project.

Element 4 5 – Quality Control: Each offeror shall describe its capabilities to assure quality control by describing its quality control approach, corporate systems, and capabilities to maintain quality control of the construction. Each offeror shall provide specific information on how it will manage quality control and changes to meet the schedule and to facilitate quicker Government review, as well as how it will handle internal and external requests for information, shop drawings, submittal reviews, progress meetings, site visits, contract completion, closeout, as-built, and completion documentation.

EVALUATION APPROACH FOR FACTOR 1:

An offeror’s management and technical approach will be evaluated in its entirety to determine the offeror’s understanding of the requirements and its capability to execute the requirements of the solicitation. The Government will also evaluate the extent of the offeror’s consideration of the inherent challenges that are specific to this project scope and location. In evaluating an offeror’s management and technical approach, the Government will evaluate each segment as follows:

Technical Approach: The Government will evaluate proposals to determine the completeness and feasibility of an offeror’s management approach and its understanding of the overall scope of work, the phased repairs, and anticipated challenges. Additionally, the Government will evaluate an offeror’s approach regarding the following aspects:

Element 1 Schedule: The Government will review the contract duration presented in the preliminary schedule to determine if it satisfies the requirements of the Government's RFP.

The Government will also review the schedule for logic shown concerning integration and/or sequencing construction work on the different elements of the project. Greater weight will be given to schedules which identify and include the major construction milestones and project elements in both pre-NTP and in the construction phase. The Government will review the schedule and narrative for how well it identifies and addresses constraints on the performance of the work, such as labor, material availability, permits, long lead items, etc.

Greater weight will be given to detailed narratives which clearly identify critical schedule related issues and potential problems and discuss meaningful mitigation strategies to avoid sources of potential delays. Greater weight will also be given to schedules and narratives which demonstrate a clear and comprehensive understanding of all of the elements of the project scope of work.

Element 1 2 - Jordan Business License:

The offeror will show that they have the necessary construction licenses and documentation to prove that they have worked and can currently work in Jordan or provide proof of their ability to obtain a construction license to perform work in Jordan. Offerors must submit copies of their current licenses to perform construction projects in Jordan as part of their proposals.

Greater weight will be given to offerors that are able to prove to the satisfaction of the Government the sufficiency of their current, valid licenses and registrations to allow them to perform the work under this contract.

Schedule: The Government will review the contract duration presented in the preliminary schedule to determine if it satisfies the requirements of the Government’s RFP. The Government will also review the schedule for logic shown concerning integration and/or sequencing construction work on the different elements of the project. Greater weight will be given to schedules which identify and include the major construction milestones and project elements in both pre-NTP and in the construction phase. The Government will review the schedule and narrative for how well it identifies and addresses constraints on the performance of the work, such as labor, material availability, permits, long lead items, etc.

Greater weight will be given to detailed narratives which clearly identify critical schedule related issues and potential problems and discuss meaningful mitigation strategies to avoid sources of potential delays. Greater weight will also be given to schedules and narratives which demonstrate a clear and comprehensive understanding of all of the elements of the project scope of work.

Element 2 3 - Base Access and Security Requirements:

The Government will evaluate the extent of an offeror’s understanding of the security requirements at Muwaffaq Salti Air Base. The Government will evaluate an offeror’s plan to control access to the work site and for obtaining base access for completeness, reasonableness, and feasibility of the plan. The Government will evaluate each offeror’s understanding of current base access/pass procedures, requirements and potential constraints.

The completeness, reasonableness, feasibility, and timeline of the offeror’s plan to gain a sufficient number of base passes to meet the offeror’s staffing plan will be considered.

Greater weight will be given to offerors that demonstrate they currently perform work in Jordan, with the greatest weight given to offerors that have demonstrated the ability to access military installations in Jordan and able to comply with the force protection escort requirements and compliance with CENTCOM Clause 5152-225-5916 Mandatory Eligibility for Installation Access which is listed in full text in section 00 73 00.

Element 3 4 - Organization:

The Government will evaluate an offeror’s plan to manage the project. The Government will assess an offeror’s proposed project organization for well-defined roles, responsibilities, and authority delegated to its team. The Government will evaluate an offeror’s organizational chart and narrative to determine the effectiveness of the relationships and work flow between the offeror’s home office, field office, major subcontractor(s), QC personnel, safety personnel, USACE, and any JV partners if applicable.

Greater weight will be given to offerors who can effectively demonstrate organizational structure, process, and procedures that minimize the risk to the Government.

Greater weight will be given to proposals that demonstrates an understanding of: (1) how the requirements will be accomplished under the proposed organizational structure; (2) how supervision will be accomplished during all phases of work; and (3) how various types of problems will be effectively and efficiently resolved within the organization.

Greater weight will be given to offerors who effectively demonstrate they will self-perform more than twenty percent (20%) of the work as required by clause 52.236-1 entitled in “Performance of Work by the Contractor” found herein this solicitation.

Element 5 – Quality Control:

The Government will evaluate an offeror's quality control approach, corporate systems, and capabilities to assure quality control of the construction. The Government will evaluate how the offeror will manage quality control and changes to meet the schedule and to facilitate quicker Government review, as well as how it will handle internal and external requests for information, shop drawings, submittal reviews, progress meetings, site visits, contract completion, closeout, as-built, and completion documentation.

A single technical rating will be assigned to the management/technical approach of an offeror’s proposal. The ratings include consideration of risks in conjunction with a proposal’s significant strengths, strengths, weaknesses, significant weaknesses, uncertainties, and deficiencies. The Factor 1 evaluation will utilize the combined technical /risk ratings and the risk descriptions as follows:

Table 1. Combined Technical/Risk Rating Method

Color Rating

Adjectival Rating

Description

Blue

Outstanding

Proposal indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low.

Purple

Good

Proposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate.

Green

Acceptable

Proposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Yellow

Marginal

Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

Red

Unacceptable

Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation, and thus, contains one or more deficiencies, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is unacceptable. Proposal is unawardable.

4. All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.