Amendment No. 2.pdf
PDF 47 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Multipurpose Academic Building Science Facility Phase 2, which is located at the USMA West Point NY
- Solicitation number
- W912DS-11-B-0005
About this file
Amendment No. 0002
View the file
Other files
Show all 37
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
W16ROE11175116
AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT
Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.
15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)
30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30
APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84
STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA
FAR (48 CFR) 53.243
The purpose of this amendment is to:
a. Re-issue Section 00101 7.0 PAST PERFORMANCE CUSTOMER QUESTIONNAIRE
b. Clarify that Step One Technical Proposals are due on 26 July 2011 at 2:00pm EST.
c. Inform all offerors that all of the 90% specifications and draw ings currently posted on FedBizOps w ebsite are considered to be Appendix A.
NOTE: Offerors must acknow ledge receipt of this amendment by the date specified in the solicitation (or as amended) by one of the follow ing methods: in the space provided on the SF 1442, by separate letter, by telegram or by signing block 15 below . FAILURE TO ACKNOWLEDGE AMENDMENT BY THE DATE AND TIME SPECIFICED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER IN ACCORDANCE WITH
THE SUBMISSION, MOFICATION, REVISION, AND WITHDRAWAL OF PROPOSALS (FAR 15.208)
1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES
1 5
16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)
16C. DATE SIGNED
BY 01-Jul-2011
16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR
(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)
8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W912DS-11-B-0005
X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)
23-Jun-2011
10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)
9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.
11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS
X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.
Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:
(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;
or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN
REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.
12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)
13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.
IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.
A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE
CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.
B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).
C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:
D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)
E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.
14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)
10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.
2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)
6. ISSUED BY
3. EFFECTIVE DATE
01-Jul-2011
CODE
US ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS, NEW YORK
26 FEDERAL PLAZA, RM 1843
NEW YORK NY 10278-0090
W912DS 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)
4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.
CODE
See Item 6
FACILITY CODECODE
EMAIL:TEL:
W912DS-11-B-0005
SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE
SUMMARY OF CHANGES
SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE
The following have been added by full text:
AMENDMENT 2
7.0 PAST PERFORMANCE CUSTOMER QUESTIONNAIRE
The Offeror/Contractor listed is being considered in a Source Selection by the US Army Corps of Engineers, New York District. This is a request for past performance information on a project the Offeror has identified as being relevant to this solicitation. This information will be used in the evaluation of the Offeror's performance of that project. The following information, once submitted, will be treated as confidential and will not be released. This information will only be used to evaluate this Offeror for this solicitation. Please complete the following questionnaire utilizing the following guidance:
a. Handwritten responses are sufficient.
b. Circle a rating as listed below and provide a brief supporting narrative for your area of administrative responsibility. In the event of any unsatisfactory performance, please describe the cause and corrective actions, and any other pertinent information relative to the contractor's inadequate performance.
c. The assessment questions contained in this questionnaire shall be rated pursuant to the following definitions:
Exceptional (E) - Indicates the contractor's performance exceeded the contractual requirements.
Satisfactory (S) - Indicates there were no major problems that were not quickly and effectively solved by the contractor, and the contractor was meeting all contractual requirements.
Marginal (M) - Indicates the area of evaluation contained major problems that were not effectively solved by the contractor. The contractor met basic contract requirements with assistance from the customer. Please include any written documentation supporting this rating.
Unsatisfactory (U) - Indicates a serious problem existed on the part of the contractor that precluded the contractor from meeting the contractual requirement(s). Please include any written documentation supporting this rating.
N/A - Not applicable or observed.
d. Please return the completed forms to the US Army Corps of Engineers, New York District at the following mailing address or via fax to (212) 264-3013 (Attn: Jason L Parker):
US Army Corps of Engineers, New York District Attn: Contracting Division, Room 1843 Jacob K. Javits Federal Building 26 Federal Plaza New York, NY 10278-0090 jason.l.parker@usace.army.mil
PAST PERFORMANCE CUSTOMER QUESTIONNAIRE
PROJECT: Construction of the Science Center Phase II at the USMA, West Point, NY
“The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, New York District, is interested in your assessment of the name company’s “past performance”. Past performance refers to the company’s record of conforming to contract requirements and to standards of good workmanship; the company’s record of forecasting and controlling costs; the company’s adherence to contract schedules including administrative aspects of performance; the company’s history of reasonable and cooperative behavior and commitment to customer satisfaction; and the company’s general business-like concern for the interest of the customer. These questions relate to work performed by:
Contractor under review: (Insert Company Name) Name and Location of Project:
Respondent Identification:
Name Date Company/Organization Position/Job Title Telephone Number
Questionnaire:
1. Is the information provided by the contractor on the attached Project Information Sheet accurate and correct to the best of your knowledge? Yes ( ) No ( )
2. What type of work did the contractor perform?
3. How would you rate the contractor's overall performance?
E S M U N/A
4. How would you rate the contractor's overall corporate management, integrity, reasonableness, and cooperative conduct?
E S M U N/A
5. How would you rate the contractor's quality control program and performance on delivery of quality work?
E S M U N/A
6. How effective was the contractor in meeting completion requirements including punch list items and warranty work?
E S M U N/A
7. How efficient and timely were the services performed (compliance with the schedules of completion)?
E S M U N/A
8. Please circle the statement that best describes your feelings with regard to the contractor.
a. They were an outstanding contractor in every respect. Problems were solved in a spirit of teamwork. Quality work, timely actions, and complete documentation were routinely achieved. We would pay a premium price to contract with them again.
b. They were an above average contractor to whom we would not hesitate to award to again. Problems encountered were minor and solutions were found with little difficulty.
c. They were an average contractor meeting the minimum requirements of the contract. Performance deficiencies improved when identified by the client/agency.
d. They were a below average contractor. Numerous problems developed that were a result of their lack of cooperation and failure to perform as required. An aggressive inspection program was required to ensure compliance.
e. They were a poor contractor who we would not want again under any circumstances. We would have been within our rights to terminate them for default.
f. None of the above. Please provide your statement.
9. Was the contractor given any of the following (or anything of a similar nature)?
Cure Notice: Yes No
Show Cause Notice: Yes No Termination for Default: Yes No
10. If there are any additional comments, information, etc. that you would like to add to the survey that does not fall into any of the above categories, please indicate below:
Return to:
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, New York District 26 Federal Plaza Room 1843 Attn: Contracting Division New York, N.Y. 10278-0090
917-790-8080(Phone) 212-264-3013 (Fax) jason.l.parker@usace.army.mil
(End of Summary of Changes)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .