Q&A.pdf

PDF 309 KB Posted

Attached to
FY16 Boardman Dam Removal and Restoration
Solicitation number
W911XK-16-R-0006
Issued by

About this file

Q&A

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Revised_Exhibit_B-_Key_Personnel_Information_&_Consent_Form_.pdf PDF
01_29_01_Amendment_0006.pdf PDF
Dam_Safety_Inspection_Report--Boardman_Dam_2015.pdf PDF
W911XK-16-R-0006-0006_FY16_Boardman_River_Dam_Removal_and_Restoration.pdf PDF
Certification_Regarding_Responsibility_Matters.pdf PDF
W911XK-16-R-0006-0005_FY16_Boardman_River_Dam_Removal_and_Restoration.pdf PDF
31_70_00_Amendment_0004.pdf PDF
31_23_00_Amendment_0004.pdf PDF
01_29_01_Amendment_0004.pdf PDF
W911XK-16-R-0006-0004_FY16_Boardman_River_Dam_Removal_and_Restoration.pdf PDF
32_90_00_Amendment_0003.pdf PDF
B-7.1_-_Amendment_0003.pdf PDF
31_36_00_Amendment_0003.pdf PDF
31_20_40_Amendment_0003.pdf PDF
31_40_00_Amendment_0003.pdf PDF
32_60_00_Amendment_0003.pdf PDF
01_29_01_Amendment_0003.pdf PDF
W911XK-16-R-0006-0003_FY16_Boardman_River_Dam_Removal_and_Restoration.pdf PDF
W911XK-16-R-0006-0002_FY16_Boardman_River_Dam_Removal_and_Restoration.pdf PDF
Boardman_Site_Vist_1_November_2016.pdf PDF
W911XK-16-R-0006-0001_FY16_Boardman_Dam_Removal_and_Resotration.pdf PDF
Site_Visit_Sign_in_Sheet_Boardman_Dam.pdf PDF
FY16_Boardman_River_Dam_Removal_ _Restoration_Pre-Proposal_Meeting_Presentation.pptx PPTX presentation
BOARDMAN_FINAL_CERTIFIED_RTA_-PLANS_10.13.2016_24X36_.pdf PDF
BOARDMAN_FINAL_CERTIFIED_RTA_-_PLANS_09.27.2016.pdf PDF
W911XK-16-R-0006_FY16_Boardman_River_Dam_Removal.pdf PDF
Exhibit_B-_Key_Personnel_Information_ _Consent_Form_.pdf PDF
EXHIBIT_E-_Small_Business_Participation_Plan_(Form).pdf PDF
Final_Grading_Surface.zip ZIP file
Exhibit_C_-_Past_Performance_Reference_Questionnaire_revised_17_March_2016.pdf PDF
Boardman_Final_RTA_Specs_9_28_2016_.pdf PDF
Existing_Topo_Surface.zip ZIP file
Exhibit_A--Performance_Relevancy.pdf PDF
EXHIBIT_D_-_Requirements_of_the_Small_Business_Subcontracting_Plan.pdf PDF
Show all 34

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

UNCLASSIFIED\\FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY

Bid Inquiry Contractor Report All Inquiries

Project: FY 16 Boarman Dam Removal and River Restoration Review: Bidder Inquiry (00001) (sorted by CommentID ) Displaying 78 inquiries.

Id Discipline Sheet Detail Spec 6702776 Environmental W911XK-16-R-0006 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Contractor respectfully requests a 2-week extension from the November 17th deadline to best prepare the most competitive proposal.

On: Oct 21 2016.

Government Response. . An amendment is forthcoming to change the response date to 8 December 2016. On: Nov 09 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6702800 Environmental W911XK-16-R-0006 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

After review of the RFP, it appears that Factor 1 of the Technical Proposal has been limited to the pages specified which totals approximately 26 if it is assumed that the Offeror writes to each limit. Is the Offeror to assume that the other 99 pages of the Technical Proposal are to be expended in Factor 2: Past Performance? And if so, is Factor 2 simply the Past Performance Forms / Questionnaires and do the number of pages used for each get included into the 125 page limit?

On: Oct 21 2016.

Government Response. . Volume 1-Technical and Past Performance should not exceed 125 pages.

Volume 2 Price does not have a page limit. Volume 3 Small Business Participation should not exceed 25 pages. An amendment if forthcoming to further clarify. Past Performance Questionnaires are included in the Volume 1 limit of 125 pages. On: Nov 14 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6702904 Environmental na na 31 36 00 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Section 31 36 00 Part 3 Paragraph 6.e discussed placement of Riparian seed. The only seed mixes noted in the plans and specs are the Floodplain and Upland seed mixes. Please clarify.

On: Oct 21 2016.

Government Response. . Section 31 36 00 will be revised to reference "Floodplain Seed" instead of "Riparian Seed". An amendment is forthcoming. On: Oct 26 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6702908 Natural Resources na na 31 40 00

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Section 31 40 00 Part 2 Paragraph B mentions a burlap material which isn't mentioned anywhere else in the specs and plans. Please clarify.

On: Oct 21 2016.

Government Response. . Burlap is not used in this project. An amendment is forthcoming. On: Nov 09 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

Page 1 of 19ProjNet: Logged In User

12/2/2016https://www.projnet.org/projnet/binKornHome/index.cfm?strKornCob=BicPublicReportAl...

6702915 Natural Resources na na 32 90 00

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Section 32 90 00 Part 2 Paragraph 2.1.A states the nurse crop quantities as 601 lbs/ acre for Spring Oats and 252 lbs/ acre for Annual Rye. Is this correct? The quantities seem excessive.

On: Oct 21 2016.

Government Response. . The nurse crop quantities should read 60 lbs/acre for spring oats and 25 lbs/acre of annual rye. An amendment is forthcoming. On: Nov 09 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6702920 Natural Resources na na 32 90 00

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Section 32 90 00 Part 3 Paragraph 3.1.A discusses the seed area guarantee period. Just to confirm, for example, for seeding completed in October 2017 the success criteria would be measured in October 2019?

On: Oct 21 2016.

Government Response. . Per Section 32 90 00 Part 3 Paragraph 3.1.A, for seeding completed after July 1st, success criteria will be measured after July 1st of the second year following completion. Therefore, for seeding that is completed in October 2017, the success criteria would be evaluated after July 1, 2019. On:

Oct 26 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6702928 Natural Resources na na 31 20 40

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Section 31 20 40 Part 3 Paragraph 3.4.B and Section 32 90 00 Part 3 Paragraph 3.2.G have conflicting installation dates. Please clarify.

On: Oct 21 2016.

Government Response. . The County Soil and Conservation District planting season dates will be removed in Section 31 20 40 and will be referenced in Section 32 90 00. An Amendment is forthcoming.

On: Oct 26 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6702932 Natural Resources na na na

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Please clarify what seed mixes are specified for Division 1 Line Item 25 and Division 4 Line Item 5.

On: Oct 21 2016.

Government Response. . Division 1, Item 25: Permanent seeding specified in the dam breaching should be seeded with Nurse Crop and Upland Mix per Section 32 90 00, paragraph 3.3 or Nurse Crop and Floodplain Mix per Section 32 90 00, paragraph 3.2. Division 4, Item 5: Spoils areas to be seeded with Nurse Crop and Upland Mix per Section 32 90 00, paragraph 3.3. On: Oct 26 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6704991 Civil R-0.1 to R-1.5 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Can you make the Design/CAD files available now so that they may be used to perform a proper and accurate earthwork takeoff for bidding purposes?

On: Oct 24 2016.

Page 2 of 19ProjNet: Logged In User

Government Response. . LandXML files provided with the solicitation documents that were posted to www.FBO.gov can be imported into AutoCAD and the contractor can use the existing and final grade surfaces to estimate earthwork volumes. On: Oct 26 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6706285 Civil None None None Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Can the bid date be extended for one or two weeks so that contractors can adequately cost and provide substantive proposals?

On: Oct 25 2016.

Government Response. . An amendment is forthcoming to extend the response date to 8 December 2016. On: Nov 09 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6706299 Civil None None None Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Since there are no quantities listed in the bid form for the mass excavations, could the USACE please provide CAD files so the contractors can develop accurate estimates of the earthen quantities and subsequent cost to move said earth?

On: Oct 25 2016.

Government Response. . LandXML files provided with the solicitation documents that were posted to www.FBO.gov can be imported into AutoCAD and the contractor can use the existing and final grade surfaces to estimate earthwork volumes. On: Oct 26 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6709933 Natural Resources na na na

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Just to clarify, is the seeding in Division 1 Line Item 24 and 25 only along the area where the Dam is to be breached (i.e. Sheet B6.2)?

On: Oct 28 2016.

Government Response. . Division 1 Line Items 24 and 25 correspond to the restoration shown on Sheet B-6.2. In addition to reseeding the area where the dam is to be breached, this seeding also includes restoration of any vegetated land areas disturbed between the parking area south of Cass Road and the existing intake channel. On: Nov 09 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6709955 Natural Resources na na na

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Section 31 20 40 discusses the use of straw mulch and wood fiber mulch, Section 31 40 00 discusses the use of a variety of erosion control blankets, and Section 32 90 00 discusses the use of wood slurry mulch. Can you please clarify what products are required to be used in what areas?

On: Oct 28 2016.

Government Response. . Any mechanically graded areas steeper than 4:1 outside of the river restoration work (channel and floodplain) should receive soil erosion control blankets per Section 31 40 00. Section 32 90 00 applies to the whole project site. Section 31 20 40 will be amended to remove straw mulch and clarify that wood fiber mulch is the same material as wood slurry mulch (hydro mulch). On: Nov 14 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

Page 3 of 19ProjNet: Logged In User

6710240 Environmental 01 11 00, 1.2 C, 1, l Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Specification 01 11 00, 1.2 C, 1, l: Have borings been conducted on sediments? If so, please provide. Has chemical testing been conducted on sedminets? If so, please provide. If not, please provide minimum physical charateristics for material to be used as fill.

On: Oct 28 2016.

Government Response. . Soil boring logs for the dam embankment are included in Section 02 30 00 - Geotechnical Data. No chemical testing has been conducted on these sediments. Refer to Section 32 12 16

- Cass Road Specifications for physical characteristics required for fill material. On: Nov 09 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6710243 Environmental Spec Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Have any hazardous material characterizations been performed to determine whether the power house and intake works contain hazardous materials? If so, please provide relevant information. If not, please confirm Offeror shall conduct ACM & ORM surveys and include. Please note where ACM / ORM survey cost should be included.

On: Oct 28 2016.

Government Response. . For information regarding hazardous material characterizations see Section 02 41 16, paragraph 1.5 D. ACM/ORM survey costs should be included as part of the Powerhouse Superstructure Demolition as stated in Section 01 29 01, paragraph 2.3 A. On: Nov 09 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6710244 Environmental

5.3. Specification 01 29 01, Measurement and Payment, 2.2, A, Land Clearing Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Specification 01 29 01, Measurement and Payment, 2.2, A, Land Clearing: Unit of measurement on Price Schedule is JA whereas Measurement and Payment indicates payment by the acre. Please align Bid form and Measurement & Payment.

On: Oct 28 2016.

Government Response. . An amendment is forthcoming to change Specifications Section 01 29 01 Part

2.2 A to read "Bid Item Division 1, Item 1 shall be paid for at the Contract Job price for site clearing of trees and vegetation." On: Nov 09 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6710246 Environmental

6.4. Specification 01 29 01, Measurement and Payment, 2.2, D, Articulated Concrete

Blocks:

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Specification 01 29 01, Measurement and Payment, 2.2, D, Articulated Concrete Blocks: Unit of measurement on Price Schedule is JA whereas Measurement and Payment indicates payment by the square yard. Please align Bid form and Measurement & Payment.

On: Oct 28 2016.

Government Response. . An amendment is forthcoming to change Specifications Section 01 29 01 Part

2.2 D to read "Bid Item Division 1, Item 4 shall be paid for at the Contract Job price for the total quantity of articulated block system required for the project." On: Nov 09 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6710247 Environmental

Page 4 of 19ProjNet: Logged In User

7.5. Specification 01 29 01, Measurement and Payment, 2.2, V Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Specification 01 29 01, Measurement and Payment, 2.2, V: Please provide an elevation differential between which the dam embankment materials are excavated. Is it correct to assume that the auxiliary spillway channel has been completed.

On: Oct 28 2016.

Government Response. . Approximate restored river channel elevation at the dam embankment is 615' (refer to the River Restoration Plans for the exact elevations through the entire embankment). Per the construction sequence provided on Sheet T-1.2 and Breaching Sheets included in the Construction Drawings, the auxiliary spillway channel would be completed at this time. On: Nov 09 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6710255 Environmental Specification 01 29 01, Measurement and Payment, Signage

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Specification 01 29 01, Measurement and Payment, Signage: Please provide the basis and schedule of payment for this item.

On: Oct 28 2016.

Government Response. . Refer to Section 01 29 01, paragraph 2.7 C. Item will be paid in full upon completion of work. On: Nov 09 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6710271 Environmental 10.8. Specification 01 32 33, Photographic Documentation

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Specification 01 32 33, Photographic Documentation: Is a professional photographer required?

On: Oct 28 2016.

Government Response. . No, a professional photographer is not required. On: Nov 09 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6710273 Environmental Specification 01 29 01, Measurement and Payment, Mobilization

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Specification 01 29 01, Measurement and Payment, Mobilization: Please provide the basis and schedule of payment for this item. Offerors respectfully recommends 75% paid during mobilization and 25% paid during demobilization.

On: Oct 28 2016.

Government Response. . Refer to Section 01 29 01, paragraph 2.7 A. Item to be paid in full upon completion of work. On: Nov 09 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6710277 Environmental Specification 01 35 26, 3.5.1 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Specification 01 35 26, 3.5.1: Is this requirement for an independent, third-party utility locating company in addition to

MISS DIG?

On: Oct 28 2016.

Page 5 of 19ProjNet: Logged In User

Government Response. . No, MISS DIG is sufficient. On: Nov 09 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6710283 Environmental Specification 01 78 00, 1.2.2 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Specification 01 78 00, 1.2.2: Are the record drawings to include a complete topographic survey by a registered land surveyor?

On: Oct 28 2016.

Government Response. . The record drawings are to include a complete topographic survey by a registered land surveyor as stated in specifications Section 01 71 23 part 1.1 D. On: Nov 09 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6710288 Environmental Specification 01 99 90, DEQ Permit, bottom page 1

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Specification 01 99 90, DEQ Permit, bottom page 1: General description includes 18" equalization culverts every 200' in seep areas where the permanent access road impacts wetlands. The contract plans do not show these culverts.

Please clarify.

On: Oct 28 2016.

Government Response. . It is the Contractor's responsibility to meet the requirements of the DEQ permit.

Culverts were not shown with the permanent access road, as that is a suggested route and may be altered during construction due to site constraints or other factors arising during construction. Culvert placement will vary based on the route of the permanent access road. On: Nov 09 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6710289 Environmental Specification 01 99 90, DEQ Permit:

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Specification 01 99 90, DEQ Permit: Permit expires July 13, 2018. Considering the 720-day period of performance, the notice to proceed would have to have been issued July 23, 2016 to compete all work within the constraint.

Please confirm that the Corps will provide the required permit extension from the actual NTP date.

On: Oct 28 2016.

Government Response. . Yes, the Design Firm/USACE will provide the required permit extension. On:

Nov 09 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6710290 Environmental Specification 01 99 90, DEQ Permit

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Specification 01 99 90, DEQ Permit: Item 12 requires the installation of siltation barriers (in addition to silt fences, Item 13) downstream of construction activities. Please provide a detail of the siltation barrier and indicate required plan locations.

On: Oct 28 2016.

Government Response. . Sediment barrier curtain detail is provided on Sheet R-3.2 of the Construction Drawings. Contractor to determine required location(s) to satisfy DEQ permit requirements. On: Nov 09 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6716013 Civil W911XK-16-R-0006 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Page 6 of 19ProjNet: Logged In User

In order for us to prepare the best possible proposal including competitive pricing, and, in light of the Veterans Day holiday and Election Day, we respectfully request a 2 week extension to the due date.

On: Nov 02 2016.

Government Response. . An amendment was posted to extend the response date to 8 December 2016.

On: Nov 14 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6717163 Civil Section 01 35 26 and 01 45

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Sections 01 35 26 and 01 45 00 state that the SSHO, CQC System Manager and Site Superintendent shall be three separate employees during the dam removal phase of the project. Please clarify what items of work are included in the dam removal phase of the project.

On: Nov 02 2016.

Government Response. . Reference page 8 of the solicitation for the Breaching and Dam Removal Summary. On: Nov 14 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6717195 Civil MDEQ and Natural River Permit

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Both the MDEQ Permit (note 34) and Natural River Permits (Note 6) state that no concrete or angular rock can be utilized. Does this apply to permanent applications only or are the temporary stilling basins also subject to this requirement?

On: Nov 02 2016.

Government Response. . This refers only to permanent applications. Refer to Section 31 71 00 Part 2.2 B and Section 31 72 00 Part 2.1 C for the energy dissipation required for the temporary structures. On: Nov 09 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6717233 Civil Small Buisness Participation Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Do small businesses need to be registered in any particular system (ie. SAM) as a small business or is any business with average annual receipts of less than 36.5 Million able to contribute to the small business participation goal?

On: Nov 02 2016.

Government Response. . All offerors shall be registered at https://www.sam.gov with the NAICS code that is shown on the front page of the solicitation in accordance with FAR clause 52.204-7 and DFARS clause 252.204-7004. On: Nov 14 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6717237 Civil 31 23 00 Earthwork Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Are there any limitations on the number or location of river crossings allowed on the project?

On: Nov 02 2016.

Government Response. . There are no limitations to the number or location of temporary river crossings.

Refer to Section 31 23 00 Part 1.4 A.2.b for requirements. On: Nov 09 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6718444 Environmental Exhibit A

Page 7 of 19ProjNet: Logged In User

Exhibit A: Performance Relevancy Questionnaire: Should Offeror's include Exhibit A in Factor 1 or Factor 2 of the Technical Proposal?

On: Nov 03 2016.

Government Response. . Reference section 6.2. The Performance Relevancy Questionnaire will be considered under Factor 2. On: Nov 14 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6719993 Civil Section 00010 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Will you consider pushing the Bid Date back? Is a December 9 Bid Date acceptable to you?

On: Nov 04 2016.

Government Response. . An amendment has been issued to extend the response date to 8 December 2016. On: Nov 14 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6720025 Civil Section 00010 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

The Small Business Goals are listed in 6.4.1.e. Please clarify whether or not the total goal is 10% ( a combination of SDB, WOSB, JUBZone, VOSB, SDVOSB, HBCU/MI), or the goal is the percentages shown for all of the types of small businesses.

Small Business - 10% (Individual? or Total Project Goal?)

SDB - 2% (Individual only?)

WOSB - 1% (Individual only?)

HUBZone - 0.50% (Individual only?)

VOSB - 1% (Individual only?)

SDVOSB - 1% (Individual only?)

HBCU/MI - 0% (Individual only?)

On: Nov 04 2016.

Government Response. . 10% is the total contract goal. Note, for example, that a participation plan that reflects {1%} of the contract value for WOSB would also count towards the overall Small Business Goal;

and percentages for SDVOSB also count towards VOSB. On: Nov 14 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6720033 Civil Section 00100 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

52.222-23.b EEO lists the following goals:

Minority Participation - 4.9% Female Participation - 6.9%

Please clarify whether or not these %'s are mandatory. Is good faith effort acceptable should we not reach these goals?

Please clarify whether or not both goals are desired (11.8%), or just one of the two.

On: Nov 04 2016.

Government Response. . The Contractor's compliance with Executive Order 11246, as amended, and the regulations in 41 CFR 60-4 shall be based on(1) its implementation of the Equal Opportunity clause,(2) specific affirmative action obligations required by the clause entitled "Affirmative Action Compliance Requirements for Construction,'' and(3) its efforts to meet the goals. Reference FAR clause 52.222-23(c).

The contractor should make an effort to meet both goals. On: Nov 14 2016

Page 8 of 19ProjNet: Logged In User

Current Request Status: Request Closed Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6720114 Civil W911XK-16-R-0006 Solicitation offer Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Contractor respectfully request moving bid date out an additional 14 days to allow time to provide a more competitive bid. Thank You.

On: Nov 04 2016.

Government Response. . An amendment was posted to www.fbo.gov to extend the response date. On:

Nov 14 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6720204 Environmental Specification 02 41 16, 1.5, C Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Specification 02 41 16, 1.5, C: Please describe any assistance the Government will require from the Contractor for removal and protection of the listed Powerhouse components.

On: Nov 04 2016.

Government Response. . Contractor must coordinate with the Government to allow for adequate time and access for the Owner to remove listed equipment. Contractor shall ensure that while the listed equipment remains in place, the equipment is not damaged or harmed in any way during other demolition that may be occurring. On: Nov 14 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6720206 Environmental Attachments Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

We have experienced difficulty working with the XML files provided. Please provide those existing and proposed topography files in DWG format.

On: Nov 04 2016.

Government Response. . XML files are topographic surface files compatible with a number of software systems including AutoCADD and Microstation. On: Nov 14 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6720208 Environmental Specification 01 29 01 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Specification 01 29 01, B Haul Road item 1 indicates payment will be based on linear foot of temporary haul road.

Please provide detail and payment item for "ACCESS ROAD TO REMAIN IN PLACE" per sheets R1.1 thru R1.4.

Should contractor assume the detail for the "ACCESS ROAD TO REMAIN IN PLACE" is the same as "TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION ACCESS DETAIL SE 50 per sheet B-1.4?

On: Nov 04 2016.

Government Response. . The temporary haul roads and the 'Access Road to Remain in Place' fall under the same pay item, Section 01 29 01 Part 2.7 B. Yes, the detail for the Access Road to Remain in Place is the same as the Temporary Construction Access details shown on B-1.4. On: Nov 09 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6720210 Environmental Core wall Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Please provide any information the Government may have regarding thickness and reinforcing of the core wall.

On: Nov 04 2016.

Page 9 of 19ProjNet: Logged In User

Government Response. . See Section 02 30 00 - Geotechnical Data for a geotechnical report describing the concrete corewall and analysis done on the structure. On: Nov 14 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6720214 Environmental Sheet B-7.1 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Auxiliary Spillway Profile View and Sheet B-7.2, Typical Articulated Concrete Block Auxiliary Spillway Weir Section:

Are the ACB transverse panel seam below grade turn-downs (shown in profile) also in the channel side slopes? Is there a special detail for longitudinal ACB panel seams

On: Nov 04 2016.

Government Response. . The ACB transverse panel seam below grade turn-downs (shown in profile) are not continued in the channel side slopes. A seam will be located along the grade break at the channel floor and the side slope. There is not a special detail for longitudinal ACB panel seams. The manufacturer details are to be used, once an ACB system is selected. On: Nov 14 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6720218 Environmental Sheet B-7.2 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Typical Articulated Concrete Block Auxiliary Spillway Weir Section: The detail indicates Geogrid at the base of the ACB on the channel side slopes. Please confirm that this is the desired material between the ACB and the stone base.

On: Nov 04 2016.

Government Response. . The detail indicating Geogrid at the base of the ACB on the channel side slopes is from the manufacturer and is correct. There is to be a geotextile at the interface with the base grade and bedding stone, and a geogrid at the interface of the bedding stone with the base of the ACBs.

The geogrid is the correct material between the ACB and the stone base. An amendment is forthcoming.

On: Nov 14 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6720220 Environmental Sheet B-7.2 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Typical Articulated Concrete Block Seam Detail: It appears that this detail is for top of slope locations. Is this detail to be used longitudinally at the top of the channel side slopes? Please provide a detail for the channel turn-downs.

On: Nov 04 2016.

Government Response. . This detail is for the top of slope locations. This detail is to be used longitudinally at the top of the channel side slopes. An amendment will be issued to provide a detail for the channel turn-downs on Sheet B-7.1. On: Nov 14 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6720223 Environmental Sheet B-7.1 & B-7.2 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Sheet B-7.1, Auxiliary Spillway Site Plan and Sheet B-7.2, Typical Articulated Concrete Block Auxiliary Spillway Weir Profile: The Site Plan and Profile both dimension ACB concrete fill 10' below the core wall. However, in the Site Plan, it appears there is a second 10' band downstream in with the ACB below is grayed out. Please clarify the intent of this representation.

On: Nov 04 2016.

Government Response. . The ACB is to be filled with concrete 10' downstream of the core wall. On the Site Plan, the leader is pointed to the wrong zone and there is not a second 10' band downstream, The ACB hatch should not be grayed out. An amendment will be issued. On: Nov 14 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Page 10 of 19ProjNet: Logged In User

6720227 Environmental Sheet B-7.1 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Sheet B-7.1, Auxiliary Spillway Site Profile: It appears as though the core wall supports the upstream edge of the riprap letdown. Please confirm the elevation at which the core wall is cut.

On: Nov 04 2016.

Government Response. . The riprap should be installed such that is lies against the downstream face of the corewall, creating a wedge of riprap to dissipate energy from falling water before hitting the articulated concrete blocks. The concrete corewall is to be cut down in 1 foot increments starting from elevation 627 to

623. The riprap letdown should be installed as the corewall is cut down to elevation 627. As the corewall is incrementally cut down, rip rap above the cutdown elevation should be removed to allow clear flow path over the corewall, onto riprap, and down the spillway. On: Nov 14 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6720229 Environmental B-6.1 Specification 01 29 01, 2.2, V Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Specification 01 29 01, 2.2, V and Sheet B-6.1, Breaching, Stage 5 Plan, Proposed River Channel: Measurement and Payment for Division 1, Item 22 refers to excavation to render the channel. Is filling of the auxiliary spillway channel included in that item? May the excavated material be used for that fill? If so, is the 44,500 cy net of that fill?

On: Nov 04 2016.

Government Response. . Yes, filling is included within that pay item and it is expected that the Contractor can use the excavated material for fill of the auxiliary spillway. The 44,500 CYD is the unadjusted estimated excavation volume. On: Nov 14 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6723809 Environmental 024116 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Specification Section 024116, D.1 identifies potential ACM. Has an asbestos/Hazardous Materials survey been conducted on the facility to be demolished in accord with Federal NESHAPs. If not is the Contractor responsible to provide the survey

On: Nov 08 2016.

Government Response. . For information regarding hazardous material characterizations see Section 02 41 16, paragraph 1.5 D and specifically Section 3 of the "US Army Corps of Engineers - Feasiblity Study for the Boardman River", Environmental Assessment located at http://theboardman.org/archived-documents/historical/feasability-study.html. ACM/ORM survey costs should be included as part of the Powerhouse Superstructure Demolition as stated in Section 01 29 01, paragraph 2.3 A. On: Nov 14 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6723821 Environmental 024116 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Specification Section 024116 D.1 identifies several potential ACMs. Section D goes on to identify several other potential hazardous/regulated materials. There are no quantities provided. Without an asbestos/hazardous materials survey to provide quantities, its almost impossible to accurately estimate the abatement and disposal costs. How will the contractor be paid for abatement costs. Will the contract be adjusted depending on the results of the asbestos/hazardous materials survey or are the survey and abatement costs to be included in the lump sum price.

On: Nov 08 2016.

Government Response. . For more information regarding hazardous material characterizations please read Section 3 of the "US Army Corps of Engineers - Feasibility Study for the Boardman River", Environmental Assessment located at http://theboardman.org/archived-documents/historical/feasability-study.html. ACM/ORM survey costs should be included as part of the Powerhouse Superstructure Demolition as stated in Section 01 29 01, paragraph 2.3 A. On: Nov 14 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Page 11 of 19ProjNet: Logged In User

6723848 Contracting W911XK-16-R-0006 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Three weeks ago we solicited over 60 SBEs for this project. To date, we have received one response. We request a minimum 2 week bid time extension to allow us to expand our search for potential SBE's.

On: Nov 08 2016.

Government Response. . An amendment has been posted to FBO to extend the response date. On: Nov 14 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6724390 Civil Division 5 - Boardman Option Pay Items

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

For the pay items listed under "Division 5 - Boardman Options" will the decision be made on those items at the commencement of the contract to allow contractor to salvage on-site materials? eg. 100 acres of topsoil

On: Nov 08 2016.

Government Response. . The Contracting Officer may exercise the option by written notice to the Contractor within ninety (90) calendar days after notice to proceed. Reference FAR clause 52.217-7. On:

Nov 14 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6724863 Civil attachment earthwork Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

We are running out of time to put the bid together with all the unanswered questions to date. We especially are waiting for the request for the existing and proposed topography files in a DWG format to perform an accurate takeoff for bidding. Please post some answers and information as soon as possible or we will respectfully have to pass on spending any more time on this and therefore probably not place a bid on the project.

On: Nov 09 2016.

Government Response. . XML files are topographic surface files compatible with a number of software systems including AutoCADD and Microstation. On: Nov 14 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6724956 Transportation Maintaining Traffic, Permanent

Signing and Pavement Marking

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

In regards to section 32 50 00 1.7.10 NTCIP-Compliant PCMS is the intention to provide the PCMS for the duration of the entire project (720 Days plus 7 days prior) or only during the project work on Cass Road (90 days plus 7 days prior?

On: Nov 09 2016.

Government Response. . The PCMS is intended for use only when the Cass Road detour is in place for project work on Cass Road. On: Nov 14 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6724980 Civil Section 32 60 00 River Signage

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

The signage under section 32 60 00 River Signage does not have any sizing specified or locations (other than upstream river signs) please clarify the required size and locations.

Page 12 of 19ProjNet: Logged In User

On: Nov 09 2016.

Government Response. . Size of signs should be as they are shown in the attachment to Section 32 60

00. Some are shown as 8.5 x 11 inches, 24.5 x 18.5 inches, or 36.5 x 24.5 inches. Signs should be clear and visible to river and park users in the area. These are sample signs and Contractor should coordinate with the COR (COR will coordinate with the Grand Traverse Conservation District). A figure showing suggested sign placement will be included in an Amendment to specification Section 32 60 00. On: Nov 14 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6728071 Environmental Specification 01 29 00, 2.2 F Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Please provide a specification for Engineered Earth Fill. Is this the impervious/impermeable clay material shown within the berms on Sheet B-7.2 and 7.3 and beneath the overflow section and backfill around the 36" culverts on B-7.4?

On: Nov 14 2016.

Government Response. . Yes, the engineered fill is the impervious/impermeable clay material that is backfill for all structures, training berms, the tailwater control berm (beneath the overflow section), and backfill around the 36" culverts. See Section 31 71 00, Part 2.2, F for description of Impervious Clay Fill (i.e. engineered fill). On: Nov 17 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6728072 Environmental

Sheet B-7.2, Typical Articulated Concrete Block

Auxiliary Spillway Weir Section

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Geogrid is shown at the base of the ACB. Please clarify the extent of geogrid, if any, required. The only other mention of geogrid is in relation to Coarse Aggregate Drainage Layer Specifications in 31 70 00, 2. E.

On: Nov 14 2016.

Government Response. . The geogrid is to be placed under all areal extent of the ACBs between the bedding stone and the ACBs. While, geotextile is at the interface of the subgrade and the ACB bedding stone (#1 and #2 stone). A geogrid product description will be added. An amendment is forthcoming to amended Section 31 70 00. On: Nov 17 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6728073 Environmental Specification 01 29 01, 2.2, H Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Please provide a specification for Granular Fill/Clean River Stone. Is #1 & #2 Bedding Stone equivalent? Is the 36" HDPE pipe bedding comprised of this material as well?

On: Nov 14 2016.

Government Response. . Granular Fill/Clean River Stone is meant to refer to the AASHTO #1 and #2 Bedding Stone. Section 01 29 01 will be amended to avoid this confusion. The 36" HDPE pipe bedding is comprised of #1 and #2 Bedding Stone. On: Nov 17 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6728074 Environmental Specification 31 23 00, 2.2, A Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Specification calls for granular borrow between Stations 2+40 and 4+35, please confirm location of these stations.

On: Nov 14 2016.

Page 13 of 19ProjNet: Logged In User

Government Response. . Disregard these stations. Section 31 23 00, 2.2, A should read "Granular Borrow shall be used to backfill the channel at the powerhouse and dam as shown on the Drawings." This Section will be amended. On: Nov 17 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6728082 Environmental RFI Previously Answered Question

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

7. The response to Question 6710273 states that Mobilization costs are paid in full upon completion of work. Implicit in this position is the need for the contractor to finance all mobilization costs that it has elected to include in the item for the 2-year project duration. Typically Offerer sees terms that provide for at least two disbursements of mobilization costs. The first large disbursement (75% to 80%) at completion of initial mobilization activities (perhaps a month or so into the project) and the remainder at overall project completion. Please reconsider the stated payment provision.

On: Nov 14 2016.

Government Response. . The Government shall make progress payments monthly as the work proceeds.

Reference FAR clause 52.232-5 Payments under Fixed-Price Construction Contracts. On: Nov 17 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6728083 Environmental

Refer to drawing R-0.1 –

SEQUENCING AND

SEDIMENT MANAGEMENT

PLAN

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Provide existing average water depth by station (include elevation for top of surface/river water vs. existing grade/bottom of channel elevation). Michigan DEQ Permit Dated July 13, 2016 indicates 158,360 cubic yards of excavation is from below Ordinary High Water Mark (OHWM), however bid documents/grading profiles do not clearly depict average existing OHWM by station.

On: Nov 14 2016.

Government Response. . For the cut and fill volumes, the OHWM was assumed to be at the top of bank of the restored river channel. On: Nov 17 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6728084 Environmental

Refer to drawing R-1.1 thru

R-1.4 – CHANNEL

ALIGNMENT PLAN &

PROFILES

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Provide the proposed/finished grade elevations (or maximum allowable height) for spoil areas 1 thru 7 as there are no grades provided on these drawings.

On: Nov 14 2016.

Government Response. . Proposed/finished grade elevations for the spoils areas are shown on the cross section views on Sheet R-2.5. On: Nov 17 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6735487 Natural Resources na na na

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Per the attached PDF, what erosion control methods (i.e. erosion control blanket, hydromulch) is specified for each area (i.e. Banks, Floodplain, Streambank)?

If erosion control blanket, what product is specified to be used?

Page 14 of 19ProjNet: Logged In User

(Attachment: Publication1.pdf) On: Nov 21 2016.

Government Response. . Based on the PDF posted with comment, the banks would not receive seed or erosion control, unless owner exercises option item "Topsoil and Seed Impacted Uplands" upon which COR would designate upland areas for site restoration. The floodplain, as shown in the PDF would receive hydromulch as specified in Section 32 90 00. The streambanks would not receive seed or erosion control unless owner exercises option item "FES Bank Construction" or option item "Fabric Slope Protection". In general, Contractor to determine what erosion control method is appropriate per the specifications. Erosion Control Blanket usage is specified for seeded slopes steeper than 4:1 (Section 31 40 00). Hydromulch to be applied in all seeded areas with gentler slopes than 4:1. Streambanks do not receive erosion control unless an option item (FES lifts or Fabric Slope Protection) is selected. On: Nov 22 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6735520 Natural Resources na na 32 90 00

Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Is hydromulch required in the Upland Areas if seed is broadcast and harrowed?

On: Nov 21 2016.

Government Response. . Erosion control measures should be placed over all seeded areas. Erosion control measures should be in accordance with Sections 31 40 00 and 31 20 40. Erosion control blanket should be applied on seeded slopes steeper than 4:1. Hydromulch should be applied on seeded areas with gentler slopes than 4:1. Harrowing is not an approved erosion control method. On: Nov 22 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6736913 Hydrology SECTION 33 46 16 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Flow data available through the USGS (04126970 Boardman R. above brown bridge road near Mayfield, MI) is several miles upstream of the breaching area. This data shown provides a mean over the last 19 years of 115 CFS, and a max in 2014 of 250 CFS. Is there any other additional flow data available for the Boardman river closer to the dam location? Is there bathymetry data available for the reservoir or an estimate of reservoirs total volume?

On: Nov 22 2016.

Government Response. . A statistical analysis was conducted by the MDEQ on the USGS (gage 04126970) flow data to estimate the monthly 50% frequency discharges as well as flood flow discharges of the Boardman River at the Boardman Dam location. These flows are provided on Sheet T-1.2. Bathymetric data is provided in the Existing Surface LandXML file provided with the solicitation documents. Total reservoir volume is approximately 103 acre-feet. On: Nov 23 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6736921 Hydrology SECTION 33 46 16 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

What is the reasoning behind the 0.5 ft/s maximum velocity on the intake screens? Please provide greater detail for this specification item to help clarify its intent.

On: Nov 22 2016.

Government Response. . This requirement is included within the specifications for the intent of limiting fish impingement against the siphon intake screens. On: Nov 23 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6742997 Environmental RFP requirement Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Should the Offeror include Exhibit A get in Factor 1 or Factor 2 of the proposal?

On: Nov 29 2016.

Page 15 of 19ProjNet: Logged In User

Government Response. . Exhibit A Past Performance Relevancy Questionnaire will be considered under Factor 2: Past Performance. Reference Paragraph 6.2-4 of the solicitation. On: Nov 29 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6743519 Environmental RFP requirement Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

The RFP references a Gantt Chart as required in Factor 3. Can you please specify what this is in reference to and what should be depicted in the Chart? It is also required to be folded and inserted into the loose leaf binder. Is this accurate?

On: Nov 29 2016.

Government Response. . The Gantt Chart is required for Factor 1, Subfactor 4: Proposed Contract Duration and Proposed Schedule. Reference Paragraph 6.1.4. An amendment is forthcoming. On: Nov 29 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6743785 Environmental RFP requirement Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

The Offeror respectfully requests that the Government consider increasing the page limit of the Technical Approach as long as the Offeror stays within the 125 page limit for Volume 1. This would afford the Offeror the ability to include sufficient info to meet requirement 2.9.3.

On: Nov 29 2016.

Government Response. . The contractor may have as many pages as needed for the subfactors as long as the maximum pages for each volume is not exceeded. Volume 1 maximum of 125 pages; Volume 2 no maximum; and Volume 3 maximum of 25 pages. On: Nov 29 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6746359 Civil 31 70 00 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

For Division 1 pay item 14 is there a minimum wall thickness required for the 36" HDPE pipe or is any pipe made of HDPE acceptable?

On: Dec 01 2016.

Government Response. . There is no specified minimum thickness for the 36" HDPE pipe, however the pipes must be capable of withstanding the buried pressures of engineered fill and rip rap. It is contractor's responsibility to ensure culverts remain free and clear, capable of passing their full design capacity. On:

Dec 02 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6746361 Civil R3.2 Comment Classification: Unclassified\\For Official Use Only (U\\FOUO)

Sheet R3.2 has a detail 4 for sediment exclusion barrier but the plans and specifications do not contain information on where and when it will be required, please clarify.

On: Dec 01 2016.

Government Response. . These details are to be utilized where bank construction is to be completed on the active flowing stream. This applies to construction applications that involve more than simple excavation of impoundment sediment, such as during installation of large wood log crib wall,large wood flow deflectors,habitat jams, fabric encapsulated soil lift streambanks, and if utilized, fabric slope protection. On:

Dec 02 2016 Current Request Status: Request Closed

Information for this report is procurement sensitive.

6746362 Civil B 6.3

Page 16 of 19ProjNet: Logged In User

Shee…

This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .