FY16_Boardman_River_Dam_Removal_ _Restoration_Pre-Proposal_Meeting_Presentation.pptx

PPTX presentation 148 KB Posted

Attached to
FY16 Boardman Dam Removal and Restoration
Solicitation number
W911XK-16-R-0006
Issued by

About this file

Preproposal Slices

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Revised_Exhibit_B-_Key_Personnel_Information_&_Consent_Form_.pdf PDF
Q&A.pdf PDF
01_29_01_Amendment_0006.pdf PDF
Dam_Safety_Inspection_Report--Boardman_Dam_2015.pdf PDF
W911XK-16-R-0006-0006_FY16_Boardman_River_Dam_Removal_and_Restoration.pdf PDF
Certification_Regarding_Responsibility_Matters.pdf PDF
W911XK-16-R-0006-0005_FY16_Boardman_River_Dam_Removal_and_Restoration.pdf PDF
31_70_00_Amendment_0004.pdf PDF
31_23_00_Amendment_0004.pdf PDF
01_29_01_Amendment_0004.pdf PDF
W911XK-16-R-0006-0004_FY16_Boardman_River_Dam_Removal_and_Restoration.pdf PDF
32_90_00_Amendment_0003.pdf PDF
B-7.1_-_Amendment_0003.pdf PDF
31_36_00_Amendment_0003.pdf PDF
31_20_40_Amendment_0003.pdf PDF
31_40_00_Amendment_0003.pdf PDF
32_60_00_Amendment_0003.pdf PDF
01_29_01_Amendment_0003.pdf PDF
W911XK-16-R-0006-0003_FY16_Boardman_River_Dam_Removal_and_Restoration.pdf PDF
W911XK-16-R-0006-0002_FY16_Boardman_River_Dam_Removal_and_Restoration.pdf PDF
Boardman_Site_Vist_1_November_2016.pdf PDF
W911XK-16-R-0006-0001_FY16_Boardman_Dam_Removal_and_Resotration.pdf PDF
Site_Visit_Sign_in_Sheet_Boardman_Dam.pdf PDF
BOARDMAN_FINAL_CERTIFIED_RTA_-PLANS_10.13.2016_24X36_.pdf PDF
BOARDMAN_FINAL_CERTIFIED_RTA_-_PLANS_09.27.2016.pdf PDF
W911XK-16-R-0006_FY16_Boardman_River_Dam_Removal.pdf PDF
Exhibit_B-_Key_Personnel_Information_ _Consent_Form_.pdf PDF
EXHIBIT_E-_Small_Business_Participation_Plan_(Form).pdf PDF
Final_Grading_Surface.zip ZIP file
Exhibit_C_-_Past_Performance_Reference_Questionnaire_revised_17_March_2016.pdf PDF
Boardman_Final_RTA_Specs_9_28_2016_.pdf PDF
Existing_Topo_Surface.zip ZIP file
Exhibit_A--Performance_Relevancy.pdf PDF
EXHIBIT_D_-_Requirements_of_the_Small_Business_Subcontracting_Plan.pdf PDF
Show all 34

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

FY16 Boardman River Dam Removal and Restoration

RFP NO. W911XK-16-R-0006

Competition Unrestricted

The NAICS code is 237990, with a Small Business Size Standard of $36.5 million in average annual receipts.

The estimated cost of construction is between $5M and $10M.

What to Submit

SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS AND INSTRUCTIONS

Proposal must be submitted in both paper and electronic format Electronic copy on CD in a sealed envelope/package Paper Copy:

Volume 1: Technical Capability Information – Original plus 3 copies and 2 digital copies(Do Not Include Price Information) Volume 2: Price Proposal – Original plus 3 copies and 2 digital copies Volume 3: Small Business Participation – Original plus 3 copies and 2 digital copies

Volume 1 – Technical Capability Information

- Relevant Experience in Key Construction Areas

- Technical Approach Summary Qualifications of Key Team Members Proposed Contract Duration and Preliminary Schedule

Volume I must NOT contain pricing information

Volume 1 – Technical Capability Information Section 100 of the Solicitation Key on what to submit!

Explicitly identifies Content of proposal submission Basis of proposal evaluation Address every item as indicated Non-conforming proposals will be deemed non-responsive regardless of the Offeror’s qualifications

Volume I must NOT contain pricing information

Past Performance Evaluations Completed by Offeror:

Exhibit A, Past Performance Relevancy Questionnaire Exhibit B, Subcontractor/Contractor Key Personnel Information and Consent form CPARS Evaluations for Referenced DoD Projects Completed by references:

Exhibit C, Past Performance Reference Questionnaire Include WITH (preferably) the proposal submittal OR may be submitted directly to USACE Send requests early >> Must be received no later than the closing date

Volume 1 must NOT contain pricing information

Volume 2 Price Proposal Contents:

SF 1442, signed by an authorized representative of the company Proposed prices of each line item in the Bid Schedule Section 0600, Representations and Certifications Make sure your registration is current at:

System Award for Management - www.sam.gov

Volume 3 Small Business Participation Contents:

Exhibit E Small Business Participation Plan Exhibit D Requirements of the Small Business Subcontracting Plan Evidence of Past Performance Utilization of Small Businesses

Proposal Preparation Carefully review sections:

Instructions, Conditions and Notices to Offerors Due date/time, method of submission, etc.

Proposal Composition and Submission Proposal contents, format, length, etc.

Selection Procedures and the Evaluation Criteria

RFP includes Davis-Bacon Wage Determination MI37 A bid guarantee is required, 20% of bid or $3 million, whichever is less (52.228-1) Performance and Payment Bonds valued at 100% of the contract value must be provided by the successful offeror within 10 days after award (52.228-15)

Proposals must be submitted in accordance with the RFP instructions NO faxed or e-mailed proposals will be accepted.

Failure to submit a complete proposal may result in removal from consideration for award.

Proposal Evaluation “Best Value Subjective Tradeoff Process”

- Subjective Tradeoff is a source selection process used when it may be in the best interest of the

Government to consider award to other than the lowest priced offeror or other than the highest
technically rated offeror.

- The subjective tradeoff process identifies in the RFP all evaluation factors and significant sub-factors that will affect contract award by clearly stating their relative importance in the solicitation.

Proposal Evaluation -Technical The non- price evaluators are to assign adjective ratings ranging from outstanding to unacceptable to each of the non-cost/price evaluation factors for each evaluated proposal.

Combined Technical/Risk Ratings Method
ColorRatingDescription
BlueOutstandingProposal indicates an exceptional approach and understanding of the requirements and contains multiple strengths, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low.
PurpleGoodProposal indicates a thorough approach and understanding of the requirements and contains at least one strength, and risk of unsuccessful performance is low to moderate.
GreenAcceptableProposal meets requirements and indicates an adequate

approach and understanding of the requirements, and risk of unsuccessful performance is no worse than moderate.

Yellow Marginal Proposal has not demonstrated an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is high.

Red Unacceptable Proposal does not meet requirements of the solicitation, and thus, contains one or more deficiencies, and/or risk of unsuccessful performance is unacceptable. Proposal is unawardable.

Proposal Evaluation – Past Performance The following definitions apply when weighing relevancy:

Very Relevant Relevant Somewhat Relevant Not Relevant Descriptions of these ratings are available in RFP Offerors may be rated neutral if past projects are not considered relevant to the proposed acquisition and relevancy cannot be obtained though key personnel and or/other subcontractors

Proposal Evaluation – Past Performance In conducting a performance confidence assessment, each offeror shall be assigned one of the following ratings:

Substantial Confidence Satisfactory Confidence Neutral Confidence Limited Confidence No Confidence Descriptions of these ratings are available in the RFP.

Evaluation of Small Business Participation

Small Business Participation Plan- must meet the minimum goal stated in the RFP.

Reference solicitation Paragraph 5.2.1 for the Small Business Rating Method.

Evaluation of “acceptable/ unacceptable” factors/sub-factors

-Small Business Subcontracting Plan-Evaluated in accordance with AFARS Appendix DD, Large Businesses must submit an acceptable subcontracting plan Past Performance Utilization of Small Business Concerns – Show documentation of reasonable effort in complying with FAR 52.219-8 to receive an “acceptable” rating

Award Procedures The Contracting Officer will e-mail the Award Notice to the awardee.

An award notice including the contract price and awardee name and address will be posted to FedBizOpps (www.fbo.gov).

No information regarding unsuccessful proposals will be released.

Plans and Specifications All Plans and Specifications are posted at FedBizOpps.

It is a prime contractor’s responsibility to provide its subcontractors with copies of the plans and specifications.

Plans and Specifications There was an additional copy of the plans uploaded to FBO. The plans are all posted in 11X17. However, This copy will allow the contractors to print in the plans in size 24 X 36.

Important Reminders The Government intends to award without discussions.

Do not anticipate a chance to make corrections or changes.

Your first proposal will probably be your only proposal.

Read the solicitation requirements carefully.

Consider using Section 00100 to “rate” yourself before submitting the proposal - Is it complete?

Any and all RFP amendments will be posted on FedBizOpps (FBO).

Check FBO regularly for changes.

Be sure to register at FBO – this is the “bidders mailing list” and you will get automatic notices of changes in most cases.

Proposal are due 17 November 2016, at 2:00 p.m. Eastern Time. No extension is anticipated.

After the proposal due date, no information will be available until award.

Proposals are due 17 November 2016 by 2:00 p.m.

Give yourself AMPLE time if you are hand delivering your proposal TO PROCESS THROUGH SECURITY and to find the Contracting Office McNamara Federal Building, 7th floor, Rm 700 Contracting Site Visit is scheduled for 18 October 2016.

LATE PROPOSALS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED

Questions (RFIs) Questions must be submitted electronically via the Bidder Inquiry Website https://www.projnet/org/projnet/ The Solicitation Number and project-specific Bidder Inquiry Key are required.

Complete instructions for registering and accessing the Bidder Inquiry system are presented in Solicitation Section 00100, Paragraph 3.1 Inquiries no later than 5 business days prior to the due date; to allow time for responses.

Questions (RFIs) Submit questions through the official Bidder Inquiry system only. Do not call other Government personnel.

The person who submitted a question will not be identified to other parties.

Questions and responses will be available to all parties and will be posted through the same Bidder Inquiry System.

Questions received late may be held and addressed after the RFP closing with those who submitted offers.

Questions?

Please submit all questions to https://www.projnet/org/projnet/ image2.jpeg image3.wmf image1.jpeg

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .