W911SA-17-R-3000_0008_Amendment_8.docx

DOCX document 126 KB Posted

Attached to
Logistics Readiness Support Services for 63rd RSC in CA and NV
Solicitation number
W911SA-17-R-3000
Issued by

About this file

This performance work statement outlines logistics support services requirements for the 63rd Readiness Division in California and Nevada. The contractor shall provide personnel, equipment, tools and other resources to perform logistics tasks including vehicle operations and maintenance, storage site operations, and field level maintenance at multiple locations. Specific requirements include staffing levels and qualifications for positions such as project manager, supervisors, mechanics and motor vehicle operators. The contractor must develop plans for phase-in, quality control, vehicle operator licensing, management and continuation of essential services. Safety, security, training and environmental compliance standards are also defined. The period of performance is one base year plus four option years.

W911SA-17-R-3000 0008 Amendment 8

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
W911SA-17-R-3000_0010_Amendment_10.docx DOCX document
Attachment_7_Wage_Determinations_Full_length_20180117.docx DOCX document
W911SA-17-R-3000_0009_Amendment_9.docx DOCX document
Attachment_7_Wage_Determinations_Full_length_20180103.docx DOCX document
Attachment_16_W911SA17R3000_Government_Responses_to_Additional_Questions_updated_20171211.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
W911SA-17-R-3000_0008_Conformed_Solicitation.docx DOCX document
Attachment_2_Price_Schedule_63d_RSC_Logistical_Support_CA_Region.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_16_W911SA17R3000_Government_Responses_to_Additional_Questions.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
W911SA-17-R-3000_0007_Conformed_Copy_Solicitation.docx DOCX document
W911SA-17-R-3000_0007_Amendment_7.docx DOCX document
W911SA-17-R-3000_0006_Amendment_6.docx DOCX document
W911SA-17-R-3000_0006_Conformed_Solicitation.docx DOCX document
Attachment_12_Density_and_Workload_CA_Region_(002).pdf PDF
Attachment_7_Wage_Determinations_Full_length_20171204.docx DOCX document
Attachment_11_CA.pdf PDF
Attachment_12_Density_and_Workload_CA_Region.pdf PDF
Attachment_6_Mission-Essential-Contractor-Services-Jul-2017.docx DOCX document
Attachment_3_PRS_DOL_Maintenance_20170815.docx DOCX document
W911SA-17-R-3000-0005_Amendment_5.docx DOCX document
Attachment_13_W911SA17R3000_Government_Responses_to_Questions.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_4_Deliverables_CA_Region.docx DOCX document
Attachment_2_Price_Schedule_63d_RSC_Logistical_Support_CA_Region.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
W911SA-17-R-3000-0005_Conformed_Copy_of_Solicitation.docx DOCX document
Attachment_9_Worksite_Locations_CA_Region.pdf PDF
Attachment_15_REVISED_Newest_Ft._Hunter_Liggett_CA_Signed_CBA_Final.pdf PDF
W911SA-17-R-3000-0004_Amendment_4.docx DOCX document
W911SA-17-R-3000-00003_Amendment_3.docx DOCX document
W911SA-17-R-3000-00002_Amendment_2.docx DOCX document
W911SA-17-R-3000-00001_Amendment_1.docx DOCX document
Attachment_3_PRS_DOL_Maintenance_20170815.docx DOCX document
Attachment_1_AT-OPSEC_63d_RSC_Logistical_Support_CA_Region.pdf PDF
Attachment_12_Density_and_Workload_CA_Region_Revised_20170621.pdf PDF
Attachment_8_Contracted_Employees_SHARP_Info_CA_Region.pdf PDF
Attachment_7_Wage_Determinations_Full_length_20170911.docx DOCX document
Attachment_9_Worksite_Locations_CA_Region_Revised_20170623.pdf PDF
Attachment_15_CBA_Fort_Hunter_Liggett_CA_Region.pdf PDF
Attachment_10_Equipment_California_Region.pdf PDF
Attachment_5_Past_performance_Attachment_Samples.docx DOCX document
Attachment_4_Deliverables_CA_Region.docx DOCX document
Attachment_2_Price_Schedule_63d_RSC_Logistical_Support_CA_Region.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
W911SA-17-R-3000_SOLICITATION.docx DOCX document
Attachment_6_Mission-Essential-Contractor-Services-Jul-2017.docx DOCX document
Attachment_11_63rd_RSC_DOL_Equipment_Time_Standards_CA..pdf PDF
Attachment_14_CBA_Barstow_CA_Region.pdf PDF
Show all 44

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

W911SA-17-R-3000

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 1449 - CONTINUATION SHEET

The following have been modified:

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

ADDENDUM TO FAR 52.212-1 INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS – COMMERCIAL ITEMS

L-1. Proposal Submittal and Inquiries.

L-1.1. Proposals shall be submitted prior to the closing date and time identified in Block 8 on the SF 1449.

Submit signed and dated offer at or before the exact time specified in this solicitation. Failure to provide all required documents or information may exclude the Offeror(s) from further consideration. No email proposals will be accepted. Failure to provide all required documents or information may exclude the Offeror(s) from further consideration. Proposals SHALL be submitted electronically to the following secure address:

AMRDEC SAFE ACCESS FILE EXCHANGE (SAFE):

https://safe.amrdec.army.mil/safe/

AMRDEC SAFE submission instructions. Offerors should select “Guest User” option and fill out all required information. Offerors shall input their legal business name for the “Personal Information” field, “Your Name.” Description of file should identify the total number of files being submitted. Deletion date shall not be less than 14 days from submission date. “Recipient Information” shall include BOTH: kelly.j.gordon.civ@mail.mil and lynn.m.herrman.civ@mail.mil

No other recipients should be specified under “Recipient Information.” Select email setting preferences to set desired security level of submission. Files cannot be downloaded by recipients until sender verifies sender email address. Verification process is identified in email through AMRDEC SAFE and is the offeror’s responsibility to verify their email address. Please be reminded that offerors are responsible for submitting electronic proposals so as to reach the Government office designated in the solicitation by the local time specified in Block 8 of the SF 1449.

L-1.2. The point of contact responsible for supplying additional information and answering all inquiries is the Contracting Officer via the Contract Specialist. Address all questions or concerns the offeror may have to the Contract Specialist and Contracting Officer. The Contract Specialist is Kelly Gordon, Kelly.j.gordon.civ@mail.mil or 608-388-2218. The Contracting Officer is Lynn Herrman, lynn.m.herrman.civ@mail.mil or 608-388-7818. All questions regarding this solicitation shall be submitted in writing via email to:

Kelly Gordon Kelly.j.gordon.civ@mail.mil

L-1.3. Site Visit. A site visit is scheduled at the facilities listed below.

ECS 170

360 Route Tampa Ft. Hunter Liggett, CA 93928 POC - Mr. Dan Simmons PH: (501)771-7832 Alternate POC - Mr. David Blair PH: (650)793-8153

September 26th, 2017 at 10:00 AM PST

ECS 171

20th St., Bldg 593 Marine Corps Logistical Base, Yermo Annex Barstow, CA 92311 POC - Mr. Dan Simmons PH: (501)771-7832 Alternate POC - Mr. David Blair PH: (650)793-8153

September 28th, 2017 at 10:00 AM PST

L-2. General Instructions.

L-2.1. The selection of a source for award purposes will be conducted utilizing source selection (negotiated) procedures as described in FAR Part 15.3. Offers will be evaluated using the criteria within 52.212-2 “Evaluation Factors for Award.” Noncompliance with the Request for Proposal (RFP) requirements may hamper the Government's ability to properly evaluate the proposal and may result in elimination of the proposal from further consideration for contract award.

L-2.2. The Offer. The submission of the documentation specified below will constitute the offeror's acceptance of the terms and conditions of the RFP, concurrence with the Performance Work Statement, and the proposed contract type.

L-2.3. It is the Government’s intention to award without discussions. Offerors are encouraged to present their best technical proposal and prices in their initial proposal submission. However, IAW FAR Part 15.306, should discussions become necessary, the Government reserves the right to hold them. If discussions are determined necessary, the contracting officer may establish a competitive range comprised of all of the most highly rated proposals. The competitive range may be limited for purposes of efficiency IAW FAR Part 15.306 (c)(2).

L-2.4. These instructions prescribe the format for the proposal and describe the approach for the development and presentation of proposal data. These instructions are designed to ensure the submission of necessary information to provide for the understanding and comprehensive evaluation of proposals.

L-2.5. If an offeror believes that the requirements in these instructions contain an error, an ambiguity, omission, or are otherwise unsound, the offeror shall immediately notify the Contracting Officer (KO) in writing with supporting rationale. The offeror is reminded that the Government reserves the right to award this effort based on the initial proposal, as received, without discussion.

L-2.6. In accordance with FAR Subpart 4.8 (Government Contract Files), the Government will retain one copy of all unsuccessful proposals. Unless the offeror requests otherwise, the Government will destroy extra copies of such unsuccessful proposals.

L-2.7. All referenced documents for this solicitation are available on the Federal Business Opportunities (FedBizOpps) web site at https://www.fbo.gov. Potential offerors are encouraged to subscribe for real-time e-mail notifications when information has been posted to the website for this solicitation.

L-2.8. Debriefings. The KO will promptly notify offerors of any decision to exclude them from the competitive range, whereupon they may request and receive a debriefing in accordance with FAR 15.505. The KO will notify unsuccessful offerors in the competitive range of the source selection decision in accordance with FAR 15.506. Upon such notification, unsuccessful offerors may request and receive a debriefing. Offerors desiring debriefing must make their request in accordance with the requirements of FAR 15.505 or 15.506, as applicable.

L-2.9. If an offer is based on a teaming/partnering relationship or a joint venture, the offeror shall provide with the proposal all required solicitation information for all parties including a copy of the teaming/partnering or joint venture agreement. The agreement shall include information which identifies the responsibilities for each entity under this contract. The agreement shall demonstrate the relationship between firms and identify contractual relationships and authorities to bind each entity of the teaming/partnering or joint venture relationship.

L-3. Proposal Preparation Instructions.

L-3.1. Each offeror's proposal shall be submitted as set forth below. Proposals which do not follow these guidelines or which do not include the requested minimum information will be eliminated from consideration for award. The overall proposal shall consist of four (4) physically separated and detachable parts, individually titled:

1. Part I - RFP Documents – Completed SF1449, acknowledgement of any amendments, teaming agreements/joint ventures, exceptions, and representations and certifications.

1. Part II – Factor 1: Technical – Proposal addressing technical requirements and the subfactors listed below:

Subfactor 1(a): Phase-In Plan
Subfactor 1(b): Quality Control Plan
Subfactor 1(c): Vehicle and Self-Propelled Equipment Operating licensing Plan
Subfactor 1(d): Key Personnel
Subfactor 1(e): Management Plan
Subfactor 1(f): Continuation of Essential Contractor Services Plan

1. Part III – Factor 2: Price – Completed SF1449 and Pricing Schedule (Attachment 2 to the solicitation)

1. Part IV –Factor 3: Past Performance- Recent past performance focusing on performance that is relevant to the services being procured under this solicitation.

L-3.2. Proposal Format

L-3.2.1. Offerors shall submit the number of copies listed in paragraph L-3.2.3, for their proposal.

L-3.2.2. Exceptions. Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, such as terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as evaluation factors or subfactors. Failure to meet a requirement may result in an offer being ineligible for award. If the offeror finds it necessary to take exception to any of the requirements specified in this solicitation, the offeror shall clearly identify the applicable Part and exceptions with a complete explanation of why the exception was taken, what benefit accrues to the Government (if any), and its impact, if any, on the performance, schedule, cost, and specific requirements of the solicitation. Each exception shall be specifically related to each paragraph and/or specific part of the solicitation to which the exception is taken. Offerors are cautioned that taking an exception may render the offer ineligible for award. It is recommended that the Offeror contact the Contracting Officer immediately, prior to solicitation closing upon identifying an area that may result in an exception. This information shall be provided in the format below.

Solicitation Exceptions

Solicitation Document Page/ Paragraph Requirement/ Portion Rationale & Impact

PWS etc

Applicable Page and Paragraph Numbers

Identify the requirement or portion to which exception is taken

Describe The rationale and impact of the exception

L-3.2.3. The proposals shall be organized into four (4) parts. A cover sheet shall be bound in each book, clearly marked as to part number, title, copy number, solicitation identification and the offeror's name. All text shall be single spaced and printed black on white paper. Printing shall be easily readable (12-pitch type or 10 point proportional spacing.) Cross-references should be utilized to preclude unnecessary duplication of data between sections. Page limitations are as follows:

PART
TITLE
COPIES
PAGE LIMITS
I
RFP Documents
1
No Limitation
II
Technical

70 Total (see specific page limitations per subfactor)

III
Price

No Limitation

IV
Past Performance

No Limitation

L-3.2.4. Proposal Limitation. The proposal shall not exceed the limits stated above. If the page limits are exceeded, the additional pages will not be considered. The Government will not accept any changes to the contractor’s proposal after the closing date of the solicitation (See FAR 15.208 for further information regarding late proposals). If discussions become necessary, page limitations may be placed on responses to Evaluation Notice (ENs). The specified page limits for EN responses will be identified in the letters forwarding the ENs to the offerors.

L.3.2.5. Page Limit Includes: All appendices, charts, graphs, diagrams, tables, photographs, drawings, etc.

L.3.2.6. Page Limit does not include covers for parts, tables of contents, glossary of abbreviations and acronyms, indices, title pages, cross reference indices, and section dividers/tables if they are inserted solely to provide ease to the reader in locating parts/sections of the proposal. Pages will be counted if they contain any other information, i.e., diagrams, extraneous data, etc. Pages marked “This page intentionally left blank” will not be counted.

L.3.2.7. What Counts As A Page? A page shall be an 8 ½ X 11” sheet of paper. When both sides of a sheet display printed material, it shall be counted as two pages. Letter size and spacing requirements for illustrations and tables can be at the discretion of the offeror but must be easily readable and no less than 10 point font. Fold-outs will be counted as the appropriate number of pages based on an 8 ½ X 11” sheet of paper. Use at least 1 inch margins on the top and bottom and 3/4 inch side margins. The Contractor shall number each page in order to eliminate any confusion. In the event contractor creates an ambiguity in their numbering of pages, the Government may exercise its own discretion in counting pages.

L.3.2.8. Indexing. Each part shall contain a more detailed table of contents to delineate the subparagraphs within that volume. Tab indexing shall be used to identify sections.

L.3.2.9. Glossary of Abbreviations and Acronyms. Each part shall contain a glossary of all abbreviations and acronyms used, with a definition for each.

L.3.2.10. Digital Copies. File names to be “Company Name – Initial” for the first submission. File name of later submissions (if necessary), shall be “Company Name – Revision X’ with X indicating the number of the revision.

L-4. Proposal Content

L-4.1. Part I – RFP Documents. Offerors are required to submit a completed SF 1449 (Solicitation, Offer and Award), acknowledgment of amendments, teaming agreements, exceptions, and representations and certifications. Failure to follow the below Contract Proposal preparation instructions may cause your proposal to be deemed unacceptable by the Government.

Solicitation, Offer and Award - The SF 1449 shall be submitted fully completed. The offeror is cautioned that the SF 1449 must contain a signature in block 30 of the form. The contractor shall acknowledge any amendments to the RFP in accordance with the instructions on the SF 30 and with, FAR 52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors – Commercial Items. The offeror shall provide the name, title, telephone number, and email address of the company/division point of contact regarding decisions made with respect to your proposal and who can obligate your company contractually. Also, identify those individuals authorized to negotiate with the Government.

Teaming Agreements/Joint Ventures – The offeror shall provide with the proposal all required solicitation information for all parties including a copy of the teaming/partnering or joint venture agreement. The agreement shall including information which identifies the responsibilities for each entity under this contract. The agreement shall demonstrate the relationship between firms and identify contractual relationships and authorities to bind each entity of the teaming/partnering or joint venture relationship.

Exceptions - Identification and explanation of any exceptions or deviations. Additionally, any assumptions used in the proposal preparation must be identified.

Representations and Certifications – The offeror shall ensure that all representations and certifications are submitted thoroughly completed with all blocks in each certification/representation completed truthfully and completely. The electronic annual representations and certifications as required by FAR 52.212-3 shall be completed electronically via the System for Award Management (SAM) web site located at http://www.SAM.gov or completed and returned with the proposal.

L-4.2. Part II – Technical. The Technical Proposal shall consist of a written narrative that addresses the following Subfactors:

Subfactor 1(a): Phase-In Plan Subfactor 1(b): Quality Control Plan Subfactor 1(c): Vehicle and Self-Propelled Equipment Operating licensing Plan Subfactor 1(d): Key Personnel Subfactor 1(e): Management Plan Subfactor 1(f): Continuation of Essential Contractor Services Plan

Part II shall have NO pricing information included. The Technical Part shall not contain the name of the company, subcontractors/team members or individual/persons names (Except for in subfactor 1d) and shall identify their firm by DUNS number one time only on the cover page.

Part II shall be clear, concise, and include sufficient detail for effective evaluation and for substantiating the validity of stated claims. Legibility, clarity and coherence are very important. Your responses will be evaluated against the criteria defined in 52.212-2, Evaluation Factors for Award. The proposal shall not simply rephrase or restate the Government's requirements, but rather shall provide convincing rationale to address how the offeror intends to meet these requirements. Statements that the offeror understands, can, or will comply with the Performance Work Statement; statements paraphrasing the Performance Work Statement or parts thereof (including applicable publications, technical data, etc.); and phrases such as “standard procedures will be employed” or “well known techniques will be used,” etc., will be considered unacceptable. Offerors shall assume that the Government has no prior knowledge of their facilities and experience, and will base its evaluation on the information presented in the offeror's proposal. Elaborate brochures or documentation, binding, detailed art work, or other embellishments are unnecessary and are not desired.

Part II shall, at a minimum, be prepared in a form consistent with the Performance Work Statement (PWS) and the evaluation criteria for award set forth in 52.212-2 of this solicitation. The section shall be prepared in an orderly format and in sufficient detail to enable the Government to make a thorough evaluation of the contractor’s technical competence and ability to comply with the contract task requirements specified in the Solicitation. Part II shall be organized according to the following general outline:

Subfactor 1(a): Phase-In Plan (no more than 10 pages)

· Demonstrate how the offeror will establish a contractor project management office

· Demonstrate how the offeror will recruit and hire necessary contractor personnel

· Demonstrate how the offeror will obtain all required contractor personnel license, certifications, clearances, and TNAC checks

· Demonstrate how the offeror will obtain Contractor and Government Issued Identification

· Demonstrate how the offeror will obtain required Email accounts

· Demonstrate how the offeror will complete joint contractor-Government inventories

· Demonstrate how the offeror will develop and submit all required contractor deliverables

· Demonstrate how the offeror will ensure contractor participation in post-award meetings, as required

· Demonstrate how the offeror will complete all necessary training requirements of contractor personnel

· Demonstrate how the offeror will establish procedures for contractor personnel to sign for government property

Subfactor 1(b): Quality Control Plan (no more than 10 pages)

· Demonstrate how the offeror will develop and maintain an effective quality control program to ensure services are performed in accordance with this PWS

· Demonstrate how the offeror will develop and implement procedures to identify, prevent, and ensure non-recurrence of defective services

· Demonstrate how the offeror will provide and maintain an inspection system acceptable to the Government

· Demonstrate how the offeror will complete records of all inspections performed and how records will be maintained and made available to the Government on demand after completion of the performance

Subfactor 1(c): Vehicle and Self-propelled Equipment Operating Licensing Plan (no more than 10 pages)

· Demonstrate offeror’s testing and licensing procedures for all self-propelled vehicles and equipment that the contractor is required to operate in the performance of this contract, such as, forklifts, tractors, trucks, dump trucks, locomotive, front end loaders, lawn mowers, bobcats, military unique items, etc.

· Demonstrate how offeror’s training, testing and licensing indicates an employee knows how a given vehicle or piece of equipment can be operated safely, effectively, without harm to themselves or others, and without damaging the vehicle or piece of equipment or surrounding structures and grounds.

· Demonstrate how training, testing and licensing shall be accomplished, and document what each employee has been licensed to operate, to include requirements of AR 600-55, AR 385-55, TB 600-1, and TB 600-2.

· Demonstrate the method the offeror will use to certify that their employees are fully qualified to operate the vehicles/equipment to which they are assigned.

· Demonstrate how the offeror will ensure an employee has and maintains a CDL for operation, when a State Commercial Driver’s License (CDL) is required for operation of a specific vehicle or piece of equipment, (the contractor or employee shall be responsible for all costs associated with obtaining or maintaining CDLs).

· Demonstrate how the contractor plans to ensure only employees who maintain a valid State Driver’s License operate Government vehicles.

Subfactor 1(d): Key Personnel (no more than 15 pages)

Offeror shall provide the following qualifications for any proposed Project Manager:

· Minimum of five (5) years documented experience in directing and managing a multi-functional Army Reserve organization, or above, logistics support activity.

· Knowledge of all Army logistics functional areas to understand how the Army logistics system (Maintenance and Supply) works and interact with each other.

· Ability to operate independently and make timely decisions to effectively manage a contract and on-site operations.

· Highly skilled in organizing, developing, coordinating and evaluating plans among numerous military units and RSC activities to identify specific requirements and to develop and adjust plans to meet each requirement on time.

· Ability to analyze organizational and operational problems and develop timely and economical solutions.

· Knowledge of financial management.

· Highly skilled in verbal and written communications to conduct meetings, execute plans, and prepare reports, plans and memorandums of instruction.

· Secret security clearance.

Supervisors may be included in the Management Plan. All Sites will have a supervisor responsible for them. If an offeror is proposing to use a Supervisor in the Management Plan, the offeror shall provide the following qualifications for any proposed Supervisor:

· Five (5) years documented leadership experience and a comprehensive knowledge of governing regulations, policies, procedures and instructions in assigned area of responsibility.

· Comprehensive knowledge of all installed product software at the user/operator level and automated data processing policies and procedures as they pertain to assigned equipment which will allow the contractor to solve and/or contact appropriate technical support to resolve any problem associated with these systems.

· Ability to provide information and reports, resolve issues and recommend actions to improve delivery of services to customers.

· Skills in verbal and written communications to conduct meetings, execute plans, and prepare reports, plans, and working instructions.

Subfactor 1(e): Management Plan (no more than 15 pages)

· Demonstrate a thorough knowledge and a full understanding of the complexity and functions detailed in the PWS

· Provide a sound management approach for responding to changing priorities, enhancing customer service, and ensuring adequate levels of performance are maintained

· Provide management techniques or procedures to be utilized to accomplish the basic functions of planning, organizing and controlling for each function depicted on the organizational structure, to include the proposed interface and relationships between major functional areas for project management and administration

· Provide a line and block chart portraying the organization from top level management to all functional area positions

· Provide a detailed explanation of its organizational structure, including:

· Project management structure and positions

· Identification of key positions, qualifications of the positions, and what authority the individuals possess

· Identification of responsible parties for managing and accomplishing what work (identify each organizational subfactor, i.e., Division/Branch/Team and the PWS requirements they are responsible for)

· Identification of labor classifications (exempt, Service Contract Act, Collective Bargaining Agreement) that will be used in each area including the number of labor hours, the number of full time equivalents (FTEs), and qualification requirements for each position proposed

· Identification of decision making authority

· Identification of how work will be scheduled at Contractor Owned/Contractor Operated (CO/CO) facilities (including use of any automated systems or work loading procedures)

· Identification of how adequate coverage will be provided during the required hours of operation as well as how staffing will be provided to support fluctuating workload, cyclical events and surge requirements, and changing priorities

· Identification of assumptions used in developing the structure (i.e. workload data, frequency, etc).

· Identification of collateral personnel appointments(Safety Coordinator, Environmental Coordinator)

· Discussion of the communications and internal control procedures that will be employed in order to ensure timeliness and quality of all subcontracted effort and how this work will be coordinated.

· Identification of what specific work the prime, subcontractors or teaming/mentor partners are performing

· Identification of approach for tracking, scheduling and documenting initial/ recurring/ refresher training.

· Identification of communication method for disseminating information within the contractor’s organization, including those personnel without computer access, and to subcontractors

· Identification of plans for replacement staffing, recruiting and maintaining adequately experienced and trained personnel

· Verification that PM shall be authorized to act on behalf of the contractor for all matters relating to this contract to include the authority to bind the contractor for matters pertaining to this contract

· Provide a detailed explanation of how the proposed number of employees per Job Classification at each Work Site Will accomplish the work identified in the PWS based upon the estimated support needed specified in Attachment 12. If the proposed number of employees for a specific Job Classification at a Work Site is less than the estimated number of support hours required based on a 1920 hour work year, the offeror must identify how the remaining number of hours will be performed. Generalized statements to include but not limited to “standard procedures will be employed” or “well known techniques will be used” etc, will be considered unacceptable.

Subfactor 1(f): Continuation of Essential Contractor Services Plan (no more than 10 pages)

· Demonstrate challenges associated with maintaining essential contractor services during an extended event

· Demonstrate the time lapse associated with the initiation of the acquisition of essential personnel and resources and their actual availability on site

· Demonstrate the components, process, and requirement for identification, training, and preparedness of personnel who are capable of relocating to alternate facilities or performing work from home

· Demonstrate any established alert and notification procedures for mobilizing identified “essential contractor service” personnel

· Demonstrate the approach for communicating expectation to contractor employees regarding their roles and responsibilities during a crisis.

L-4.3. Part III – Price. The Offeror shall complete the Price Schedule (which is included with the solicitation as Attachment 2), in its entirety. The unit prices and CLIN totals for each line item listed in the Price Schedule shall be carried over to the SF 1449. The Offeror will need to return both completed documents as part of their proposal package. Please note: Use only two decimal places in the pricing on the price schedule.

As part of the proposal, the offeror shall provide the estimated total cost (if any) incurred to comply with the enterprise Contractor Manpower Reporting Application (eCMRA) requirement. Offeror shall determine, in the price schedule, to price or not separately price the CMRA requirement. CRMA CLIN(s) shall be the CLIN(s) under which the Contractor shall bill for all costs associated with the eCMRA requirement.

L-4.4. Part IV – Past Performance: The Past Performance evaluation will be accomplished by reviewing aspects of an Offeror's recent and relevant Past Performance, focusing on and targeting performance which is relevant to the effort {As it directly relates to the work being procured under this solicitation and as defined in 52.212-2}.

Past Performance information described herein is required on the offeror and all subcontractors, teaming partners, and/or joint venture partners proposed to perform 10% or more of the proposed effort based on the total proposed price The offeror shall submit, along with the information required in this paragraph, a consent letter (Attachment 5, Enclsure 1), executed by each subcontractor, teaming partner, and/or joint venture partner, authorizing release of adverse past performance information to the offeror so the offeror can respond to such information. For each identified effort for a commercial customer, the offeror shall also submit a client authorization letter(Attachment 5, Enclosure 5), authorizing release to the Government of requested information on the offeror's performance.

1. The offeror is requested to submit the Past Performance Part IV to the Contracting Officer at the address specified in L-1.1.

2. The offeror shall include documentation regarding their relevant past performance as it directly relates to the work being procured under this solicitation. The offeror SHALL NOT go back any farther than 3 years for the submitted data. The past performance data shall document a successful history of past contract performance.

3. In conducting the Past Performance evaluation, the Government reserves the right to use both the information provided in the offeror’s Past Performance Volume and information obtained from other sources, such as the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) or similar systems, Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) and commercial sources. Offerors are reminded that both independent data and data provided by offerors in their proposals may be used by the Government to evaluate offeror past performance. However, the burden of providing thorough, complete, and current past performance information as requested in this paragraph remains with the offerors. Proposals that do not contain the information requested by this paragraph risk rejection or a less than acceptable performance rating by the Government. All past performance comments received will be taken into account and could affect the overall rating. The overall past performance evaluation is a subjective decision based on the whole of all data received. In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305 (a)(2)(iv)). Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, “unknown” shall be considered “acceptable.”

4. Submission Requirements. The offeror shall submit a Past Performance Volume containing the following:

· Table of Contents

· Summary Page describing the role of the offeror and each subcontractor, teaming partner, and /or joint venture partner that the offeror is required to provide Past Performance Specific Relevant Contract Reference Sheets for the past performance experience in accordance with Attachment 5, Enclosure 2.

· Consent Letters executed by each subcontractor, teaming partner, and/or joint venture partner, authorizing the release of past performance information so the offeror can respond to such information. A sample consent letter is attached as Attachment 5, Enclosure 1).

· Client Authorization Letters for each identified effort for a commercial customer authorizing release to the Government of requested information on the offeror’s performance Attachment 5, Enclosure 5.

· Organization Structure Change History— Organizational Structure Change History. Many companies have acquired, been acquired by, or otherwise merged with other companies, and/or reorganized their divisions, business groups, subsidiary companies, etc. In many cases, these changes have taken place during the time of performance of relevant present or past efforts or between conclusion of recent past efforts and this source selection. As a result, it is sometimes difficult to determine what past performance is relevant to this acquisition. To facilitate this relevancy determination, include in this proposal volume a "roadmap" describing all such changes in the organization of your company. As part of this explanation, show how these changes impact the relevance of any efforts you identify for past performance evaluation/performance confidence assessment. Since the Government intends to consider present and past performance information provided by other sources as well as that provided by the offeror(s), your "roadmap" should be both specifically applicable to the efforts you identify and general enough to apply to efforts on which the Government receives information from other sources.

· Specific Relevant Contracts Format - Sheets in accordance with Attachment 5, Enclosure 2 and are limited to 3 pages per reference. The offeror shall provide documentation outlining the offeror’s past performance with contracts, as a prime or major subcontractor, which is the same or similar in nature, size, and complexity to the services being procured under this Solicitation. The submittal shall include rationale supporting your assertion of relevance and how it was determined that the work performed previously was the same or similar in nature, size, and complexity to the work specified by this solicitation. Offerors are required to explain what aspects of the contracts are deemed relevant to the proposed effort, and to what aspects of the proposed effort they relate.

Past Performance Questionnaire - See Attachment 5, Enclosure 3, Past Performance Questionnaire. For the contracts identified on each Specific Relevant Contract Reference, the offeror shall forward a copy of the Past Performance Questionnaire to the points of contact responsible for monitoring performance under such contracts. The points of contact shall return the questionnaires directly to MICC Fort McCoy, Kelly Gordon, Contract Specialist, Kelly.j.gordon.civ@mail.mil. Any questionnaires not returned directly MICC-Fort McCoy will not be reviewed and evaluated. The information contained in the questionnaires will be used to evaluate the offeror’s past performance. New entities that have no past customers shall annotate on the Summary Page that they have had no previous clients and that the questionnaires cannot be provided. Do not submit more than 5 Past Performance Questionnaire’s to the Fort McCoy office.

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT

PERFORMANCE WORK STATEMENT

PART 1

GENERAL INFORMATION

1. General: This is a non-personal services contract to provide Logistical Support for the 63d Readiness Division (RD). The Government shall not exercise any supervision or control over the contract service providers performing the services herein. Such contract service providers shall be accountable solely to the Contractor who, in turn is responsible to the Government.

1.1 Description of Services/Introduction: The Contractor shall provide all personnel, equipment, tools, materials, supervision, and other items and non-personal services necessary to perform logistics tasks to support Army Reserve readiness for the military units, governmental agencies or other entities as designated by the 63d Readiness Division (RD) as defined in this Performance Work Statement (PWS) except as specified in Part 3 as incidental government equipment, and services at locations identified in Attachment 9. The Contractor shall perform to the standards in this contract.

1.2 Background: The “rational readiness model” is no longer suited to the “Ready Force” (RFX) scenario where certain OPLANS will drive a much larger force requirement through highly compressed timelines. We need units that are well-equipped and ready to deploy in days or weeks, not months or years. All positions in USAR maintenance facilities, Equipment Transition Sites (ETS) and Equipment Concentration Sites (ECS) are designated as dual status, Military Technician positions. To meet mission requirements temporary hires must be members of the Army Reserve when employees of these organizations are mobilized. This requirement makes it extremely difficult to hire temporary personnel. Maintenance and equipment storage and warehousing operations are vital to maintaining USAR readiness. The services to be performed from this Performance Work Statement (PWS) allow USAR units to continue their high state of readiness and fulfill their operational missions supporting the National Security Strategy.

1.3 Objectives: Provide efficient, cost-effective Base Operations Support (BASOPS) in support of the 63d Readiness Division (RD).

1.4 Scope: The Army Reserve is required to maintain and sustain all assigned equipment and materiel to the highest Army maintenance standards. Critical to this processes is the ability to integrate balance between preparation and of new systems; extending the life cycle of older systems; meeting the day-to-day equipment readiness requirements (storage and maintenance); and preparing for the next deployment. The Contractor shall provide support to perform and assist in the following primary operational areas:

(1) Vehicle Operations and Supporting Functions

(2) Maintenance Management Services

(3) Field Level Maintenance

(4) Storage Site Operations

1.5 Period of Performance: The period of performance shall be for one (1) Base Year of 12 months and four (4) 12-month option years, and an option to extend. The phase in period will be the first 90 days of the contract, and the phase out period will be the last 30 days of the contract.

1.6 General Information:

1.6.1 Quality Control (QC): The Contractor shall develop and maintain an effective quality control program to ensure services are performed in accordance with this PWS. The Contractor shall develop and implement procedures to identify, prevent, and ensure non-recurrence of defective services. The Contractor’s quality control program is the means by which he assures himself that his work complies with the requirement of the contract. The Contractor shall provide and maintain an inspection system acceptable to the Government. Complete records of all inspections performed by the Contractor shall be maintained and made available to the Government on demand after completion of the performance. If any of the service performed do not conform to the contract requirements, the Government may require the Contractor to perform the services again in conformity with the contract, at no increase in contract amount. After acceptance of the quality control plan the Contractor shall receive the Contracting Officer’s (KO) acceptance in writing of any proposed change to his QC system. The QC plan is to be delivered to the KO with the proposal and upon change.

1.6.2 Quality Assurance

1.6.2 Quality Assurance (QA): The Government shall evaluate the Contractor’s performance under this contract in accordance with the Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP). This plan is a Government only document primarily focused on what the Government must do to assure that the Contractor has performed in accordance with the requirements of the contract. The Government reserves the right to inspect or test any supplies or services that have been tendered for acceptance. Non-conforming services shall be re-performed at no increase in contract price. If non-conforming services are recurring, cannot be re-performed, or the services fail to achieve the Performance Requirements Summary (PRS), the Government may reject the non-conforming service(s) and document the contractor’s performance record accordingly. The government may also issue a Contract Discrepancy Report (CDR) in which the contractor will be required to respond with the development of a Corrective Action Plan (CAP) which identifies the root cause, corrective action (CA) for the root cause. CA for the specific nonconformance, and the date the CAs will be complete. The Government may also reduce the payment to the contract IAW the PRS, or reduce payment to reflect the value of the services performed or may perform the services and charge the Contractor for any related cost incurred and/or may terminate this contract for cause.

1.6.2.1 Non-conforming Supplies or Services: When a Contractor’s performance does not meet contract requirements and/or approved work schedules and/or timeframes it is considered non-conformance. Non-conformance shall be classified in one of three categories: Level I (Minor), Level II (Major) or Level III (Critical). The Government may re-inspect work designated for re-performance or late performance.

1.6.2.1.1 Level I (Minor) Non-Conformance: Level 1 is defined as a non-conformance that is not likely to materially reduce the usability of the supplies or services for their intended purpose, or is a departure from established standards having little bearing on the effective use or operation of the supplies or services. Minor non-conformance usually can be corrected on the spot, where no further corrective action (CA) response is necessary, and can be issued by the COR to the contractor either through a verbal or written non-conformance report. Minor non-conforming services shall be re-performed within a specified time frame at no increase in contract price. If minor non-conformances are recurring or re-performance is not completed in full and within the specified time a Level II non-conformance may be issued to the contractor by the Contracting Officer (KO).

1.6.2.1.2 Level II (Major) Non-Conformance: Level II is defined as a non-conformance, other than critical, that is likely to result in failure of the supplies or services, or to materially reduce the usability of the supplies or services for their intended purpose. Recurring Minor non-conformances, or a non-responsive contractor, indicating a trend or failure of the contractor’s quality control, can also be classified as a Major non-conformance. Major non-conformance’s shall result in the issuance of a written CDR from the KO to the contractor requiring the development of a CAP by the contractor which identifies the root cause, CA for the root cause, CA for the specific non-conformance and the date CAs will be completed.

1.6.2.1.3 Level III (Critical) Non-Conformance: Level III is defined as a non-conformance that is likely to result in hazardous or unsafe conditions for individuals using, maintaining, or depending upon the supplies or services; is likely to prevent performance of a vital agency mission; is for a repeated or uncorrected level II CDRs; or is for a non-responsive contractor to a level II CDR. Critical non-conformances shall result in the issuance of a written CDR to the contractor requiring the development of a CAP by the contractor which identifies the root cause, CA for the root cause, CA for the specific non-conformance and the date CAs will be completed.

1.6.2.1.4 Inspection Results: The Contractor will be notified of Government inspection results. The Contractor shall acknowledge receipt of the inspection results. The Contractor may be notified of inspection results verbally. Verbal notifications of defective work will be confirmed in writing. When Government inspectors are unable to contact the Contractor to notify the Contractor of inspection results, acceptance or rejection of work will be made on the basis of the initial inspection.

1.6.3 Federal Government Holidays: The Contractor is not required to provide routine services on Federal holidays except in emergency situations or otherwise specified in the PWS, Attachments and other associated documents.

New Year’s Day1st day of January
Martin Luther King Jr.'s Birthday3rd Monday of January
Presidents Day3rd Monday of February
Memorial DayLast Monday of May
Independence Day4th day of July
Labor Day1st Monday of September
Columbus Day2nd Monday of October
Veterans Day11th day of November
Thanksgiving Day4th Thursday of November
Christmas Day25th day of December

NOTE: If these holidays fall on Saturday, the preceding Friday will be observed. If these holidays fall on Sunday, the following Monday will be observed. If a holiday falls on a regular workday, routine services shall be rescheduled to ensure mission requirements are met.

1.6.4 Hours of Operation: The Contractor is responsible for conducting operations IAW with supported shop hours of work. The Contractor must at all times maintain an adequate work force for the uninterrupted performance of all tasks defined within this PWS.

1.6.4.1 Workload: It is anticipated that during the course of this contract there will be workload increases and decreases. The workload information displayed in the contract documents is based on historical information to represent estimated workload (Attachment 12 Density and Workload CA Region). The hours and staff displayed represent actual requirements.

1.6.4.2 Workload Increase: If there is a significant increase in workload, an option CLIN may be exercised by the Government. Workload variations may occur with little advanced notice. The Government will provide the contractor as much advance notice of workload changes as possible, minimum of 90 days. The contractor shall plan for and respond to changes in workload requirements and the resulting changes to manning levels.

1.6.4.3 Operations Tempo (OPTEMPO): The Government may require the Contractor to support extended hours of operation due to short term increases in OPTEMPO.

1.6.4.4 Inclement weather: If the 63d DOL declares an installation or facility ‘closed’ or road conditions ‘red’ or ‘black’, or otherwise deemed unsafe for routine travel/use, due to inclement weather, the contracted employees shall be required to work as follows:

· GOGO – Contracted employees are unable to report or will leave based on local schedule. Unable to work due to lack of Government oversight.

· GOCO – Contractor shall determine if contracted employees will report to work or remain at work. Government oversight only required for Quality Assurance Purposes.

· COCO – Contractor shall determine if contracted employees will report to work or remain at work. Government oversight only required for Quality Assurance Purposes.

1.6.5 Place of Performance: The work to be performed under this contract will be performed at 63d Readiness Division (RD) DOL facilities throughout CA and NV. A specific locations located outside the southwest region. A specific list of these locations has been provided in Attachment 9.

1.6.6 Type of Contract: The Government will award an Indefinite Quantity Indefinite Delivery (IDIQ) Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract for this requirement. This IDIQ would be administered using task orders issued for services as needed.

1.6.7 Antiterrorism (AT) and Operations Security (OPSEC): The Contractor shall be responsible for handling all security aspects of the work performed under this contract, to include personnel security and physical security, operational security (OPSEC), information assurance (IA) and information systems security; assure compliance with all DoD and US Army regulations regarding security, and assure compliance with any written instructions from the security or OPSEC officer or Information Assurance Manager (IAM) of the activity using this contract. Security requirements at any contractor owned/contractor operated facility will be the same as if the facility was a government facility. The work to be performed under this contract may involve access to and handling of operationally sensitive material. The Contractor shall cooperate with Government officials in conducting official investigations/reviews.

1.6.7.1 AT Level I Training: All contractor employees, to include subcontractor employees, requiring access to Army installations, facilities and controlled access areas shall complete AT Level I Awareness Training within 30 calendar days after contract start date or effective date of incorporation of this requirement into the contract, whichever is applicable. The Contractor shall submit certificates of completion for each affected contractor employee and subcontractor employee, to the COR or to the Contracting Officer (KO), if a COR is not assigned, within 30 calendar days after completion of training by all employees and subcontractor personnel and within 30 calendar days of new employees commencing performance. AT Level I Awareness Training is available at the following website: https://Jkodirect.jten.mil.

1.6.7.2 iWATCH Training: The Contractor and all associated sub-contractors shall brief all employees on the local iWATCH program (training standards provided by the requiring activity Administrative and Training Office (ATO)). This local developed training will be used to inform employees of the types of behavior to watch for and instruct employees to report suspicious activity to the COR. The Contractor shall submit certificates of completion for each affected contractor employee and subcontractor employee, to the COR or KO, within 30 calendar days after completion of training by all employees and subcontractor personnel and within 30 calendar days of new employees commencing performance.

1.6.7.3 Army Training Certification Tracking System (ACTCS): Contractor employees who require access to government information systems. All Contractor employees with access to a government information system must be registered in the Army Training Certification Tracking System (ATCTS) at commencement of services, and must successfully complete the DoD Information Assurance Awareness prior to access to the information systems and then annually thereafter.

1.6.7.4 Access and General Protection/Security Policy and Procedures: Contractor and all associated sub-contractors employees shall comply with applicable installation, facility and area commander installation/facility access and local security policies and procedures (provided by government representative).

This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .