Attachment_18_Relevant_Contracts _15-R-0002 _Ft._Carson _BASEOPS _19_Aug_16.docx
DOCX document 16 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W911RZ-15-R-0002
About this file
Attachment 18 Relevant Contracts 15-R-0002 Ft. Carson BASEOPS 19 Aug 16
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
Latest 50 of 62 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Attachment #18 W911RZ-15-R-0002 19 Aug 16
Specific Relevant Contracts Sheet
The offeror shall provide documentation outlining the offeror’s past performance with contracts, as a prime or major subcontractor, which is the same or similar in nature, size, and complexity to the services being procured under this Solicitation. The submittal shall include rationale supporting your assertion of relevance and how it was determined that the work performed previously was the same or similar in nature, size, and complexity to the work specified by this solicitation. Offerors are required to explain what aspects of the contracts are deemed relevant to the proposed effort, and to what aspects of the proposed effort they relate.
Past Performance Citation No.
Offeror Name Company/Division):
CAGE Code:
DUNS No.
Address:
Program Title:
Contract Number:
Contract Type(s):
List all that apply
Contracting Agency/Customer:
Period of Performance:
Contract Value Exclude Unexercised Options
| Ceiling: |
| Original: |
| Current: |
Reason for Change(s) in Value:
| Completion Date: |
| Original: |
Current:
Estimate at Complete ($):
Number and Reason for Change(s) in Schedule:
Points of Contact:
| Program Manager |
| Contracting Officer |
| Admin Contracting Officer |
Name:
Office:
Address:
Phone:
E-Mail:
Other:
Please Specify
Name:
Office:
Address:
Phone:
E-Mail:
Description of Effort:
Subcontractor/Teaming Partner shall identify Prime Contractor.
The narrative description shall explain what aspects of the example are deemed relevant to this solicitation by highlighting those portions of the example, and explaining its relevancy to this requirement.
The narrative description shall include the following:
1. General Description of Program and Project;
1. Technical Performance;
1. Quality program or effort;
1. Security requirements and any security problems or violations, if applicable;
1. Performance incentives and/or award fee earned vs. total award fee pool;
1. Management Program in achieving program goals and schedules; and
1. Cost performance including any under-runs or over-runs, cost incentives earned or lost, etc.
The narrative description shall describe major program risks for the Past Performance example. For program risks that resulted in problems, describe how the problems were identified and solved, measures taken to prevent problem recurrence, and management indicators that clearly support the problem was solved. For major program risks that did not result in problems, describe how proactive risk management techniques prevented negative program events. Providing Past Performance efforts where many program risks resulted in problems is not considered a weakness unless the offeror did not demonstrate the ability to overcome the problems encountered.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .