Attachment_0021_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx

ATTACHMENT 0021: PAST PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE

WHEN FILLED IN THIS DOCUMENT IS SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION IAW FAR 3.104

SECTION 1: CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

1. Contractor:

1. Cage Code of contractor contract was awarded to:

1. Contract number:

1. Contract type:

1. Was this a competitive contract? Yes No

1. Period of performance:

1. Initial contract cost: $

1. Current/final contract cost: $

Reasons for differences between initial contract cost and final contract costs:

1. Description of service provided:_ ____________________________________________

SECTION 2. CUSTOMER OR AGENCY IDENTIFICATION

8. Customer or agency name:

8. Customer or agency description (if applicable):

8. Geographic description of services under this contract, i.e., local, nationwide, worldwide, other Commands:

SECTION 3. EVALUATOR IDENTIFICATION

1. Evaluator's name:

1. Evaluator's title:

1. Evaluator's phone/fax number:

1. Number of years evaluator worked on subject contract:

SECTION 4: EVALUATION

Please indicate your satisfaction with the contractor’s performance by placing an ―X‖ in the appropriate block using the scale provided to the right of each question. This scale is defined as follows:

CODE PERFORMANCE LEVEL

B BLUE/EXCEPTIONAL - The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

P PURPLE/VERY GOOD- The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some (requirements) to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

G GREEN/SATISFACTORY – The contractor’s performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance contained some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

Y YELLOW/MARGINAL – Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions or the contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

R RED/UNSATISFACTORY – Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

N NOT APPLICABLE - Unable to provide a score.

B

P

G

Y

R

N

Technical Performance

T1 Quality & repeatability of operations & maintenance.

T2. Quality of technical system testing and certification efforts.

T3 Quality/integrity of technical data/report preparation efforts.

T4 Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements.

T5 Ability to implement current standard practices for computer hardware design, operation, maintenance, upgrades and configuration control.

T6 Ability to implement current standard practices for computer software design, operation, maintenance, upgrades and configuration control.

T7 Adequacy/effectiveness of environmental safety procedures.

Program Management P1. Effectiveness of overall contract management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program).

P2. Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes).

P3. Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance.

P4. Understand/complied with customer objectives and technical requirements.

P5. Successfully responded to emergency and/or surge situations.

P6. Quality/effectiveness of sub-contracted efforts.

P7. Effectiveness of material management (including Government Furnished Property or Material).

P8. Effectiveness of acquisition management

P9. Contractor proposed alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the customer.

P10. Contractor implemented responsive/flexible processes to improve quality and timeliness of support.

B

P

G

Y

R

N

Transition/phase-in T/PI1. Contractor ability to smoothly transition resources and personnel.

T/PI2. Contractor effectiveness on maintaining continuity of mission support while transitioning/phasing in resources and personnel to support other efforts.

Employee Retention/Attraction E1. Ability to hire/apply a qualified workforce to this effort.

E2. Ability to retain a qualified workforce on this effort.

E3. Effectiveness of employee compensation towards quality of work.

Small and Small Disadvantaged Business Participation S1. Ability to meet or exceed small business and small disadvantaged business goals set forth in the approved subcontracting plan.

S2. Ability to effectively manage small business participation to meet technical performance.

Cost Performance C1 Accuracy in forecasting contract costs.

C2 Ability to meet forecasted costs and perform within contract costs.

C3 Ability to alert Government of unforeseen costs before they occur.

C4 Sufficiency and timeliness of cost reporting.

1. Please discuss each and every response for which you indicated B/E (Blue/Exceptional), P/VG (Purple/Very Good), Y/M (Yellow/Marginal) or R/U (Red/Unsatisfactory) in response to the questions above (use additional sheets, if necessary).

1. Government Contracts Only: Has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations?

Yes_ No

Default

Convenience

Pending Terminations

If yes, please explain (e.g., inability to meet cost, performance, or delivery schedules, etc).

SECTION 5: NARRATIVE SUMMARY

What were the contractor’s most positive aspects in the performance of the contract?

What were the contractor’s most negative aspect in the performance of the contract?

Would you have any reservations about soliciting this contractor in the future or having them perform one of your critical and demanding programs?

Please provide any additional comments concerning this contractor’s performance, as desired.

Evaluator’s Signature Date

Thank you for your prompt response and assistance!

Please return this completed questionnaire to Sean Auld @ Sean.G.Auld.civ@mail.mil. The Subject Line of the email shall be: “PPQ: ESPS Solicitation W911QY-17-R-0003 - (Offeror’s Company Name)”