Attachment 4 CTSA_Past_Performance_Rating_Form.pdf
PDF 366 KB Posted
- Attached to
- ARNORTH CSTA Training Support Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W900KK24R0023
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Rating Form to be used in evaluating a contractor's past performance for the Civil Support Training Activity (CSTA) federal contract opportunity, Solicitation Number W900KK-24-R-0023.
The form includes six evaluation criteria: Quality of Service, Schedule, Cost Control, Business Relations, Management of Personnel, and Utilization of Small Business. For each criterion, the rater must select an adjectival rating from Exceptional to Unsatisfactory, and provide additional comments if the rating is Marginal or Unsatisfactory. The completed form is to be submitted as part of Volume 3 under the RFP requirements. The federal contract opportunity is for ARNORTH CSTA Training Support Services, with the Combined Acquisition Plan/Service Acquisition Strategy signed on January 15, 2024. The Government has posted multiple draft documents related to the upcoming solicitation, including a Draft Solicitation Cost/Price Workbook, a notional CLIN structure, and the anticipated evaluation factors/subfactors.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 39
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
CUI
ATTENTION
Use this space to indicate categories, limited dissemination controls, special instructions, points of contact, etc., if needed.
ATTENTION
All individuals handling this information are required to protect it from unauthorized disclosure.
Handling, storage, reproduction, and disposition of the attached document(s) must be in accordance with 32 CFR Part 2002 and applicable agency policy.
allowed as necessary and permissible to any individual(s), organization(s), or grouping(s) of users, provided such access or dissemination is consistent with or in furtherance of a Lawful Government Purpose and in a manner consistent with applicable law, regulations, and Government-wide policies.
Standard Form 901 (11-18) Prescribed by GSA/ISOO | 32 CFR 2002
CUI
Controlled by: Army Controlled by: ACC-ORL CUI Category: General Procurement and Acquisition Distribution/Limited Dissemination Control: FEDCON POC: Will Bass, 321-235-7649
CUI//FEDCON
Civil Support Training Activity (CSTA)
W900KK-24-R-0023
PAST PERFORMANCE RATING FORM
PAST PERFORMANCE PROJECT IDENTIFICATON (To be filled out by the Offeror):
CONTRACTOR NAME: Click here to enter text.
CONTRACT or ORDER NUMBER: Click here to enter text.
PROJECT TITLE: Click here to enter text.
TOTAL PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE,
INCLUDING OPTIONS
Click here to enter text.
PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE INFORMATION (To be filled out by the Rater):
NAME: Click here to enter text.
TITLE: Click here to enter text.
AGENCY or CUSTOMER: Click here to enter text.
PHONE: Click here to enter text.
E-MAIL Click here to enter text.
For each of the Six (6) criteria listed below, the rater must choose One (1) Adjectival Rating by checking the box, as applicable. At a minimum, for any rating that is checked Marginal or Unsatisfactory, please submit additional comments to substantiate the rating. If Cost Control of Utilization of Small Business is N/A, Please explain why. Rater: Please submit completed form as part of Volume 3 (Reference RFP Amendment 0001 Section L for submittal requirements).
1. QUALITY OF SERVICE
RATING Adjectival Rating
Definition
Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit.
The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective
Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit.
The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective
Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory
Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
mailto:usarmy.orlando.peo-stri.mbx.mtccs@mail.mil
W900KK-24-R-0023
CUI//FEDCON
Click here to enter text.
2. SCHEDULE
RATING Adjectival Rating
Definition
Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit.
The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective
Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit.
The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective
Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory
Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
Click here to enter text.
3. COST CONTROL
RATING Adjectival Rating
Definition
Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit.
The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective
Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit.
The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective
Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory
Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Not Applicable
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
Click here to enter text.
4. BUSINESS RELATIONS
RATING Adjectival Rating
Definition
Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit.
The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective
Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit.
The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective
Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory
Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Click here to enter text.
W900KK-24-R-0023
CUI//FEDCON
5. MANAGEMENT OF PERSONNEL
RATING Adjectival Rating
Definition
Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit.
The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective
Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit.
The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective
Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory
Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS:
Click here to enter text.
6. UTILIZATION OF SMALL BUSINESS
RATING Adjectival
Rating Definition
Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit.
The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective
Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit.
The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective
Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory
Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Not Applicable
Click here to enter text.
| CUI_Coversheet |
| Attachment (2) Past Performance Rating Form |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .