SOF_RAPTOR_IV-Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf

PDF 314 KB Posted

Attached to
SOF RAPTOR IV Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
W900KK-19-R-0078
Issued by
Department of the Army Materiel Command Contracting Command Orlando Contracting Center

About this file

This document includes a past performance evaluation questionnaire and details regarding a federal contract opportunity for SOF RAPTOR IV from the U.S. Army Program Executive Office for Simulation, Training, and Instrumentation. The past performance evaluation questionnaire seeks input on a contractor's performance on similar federal contracts and will be used to evaluate offerors for the SOF RAPTOR IV contract. The SOF RAPTOR IV contract opportunity is a flexible and responsive IDIQ contract vehicle with a ceiling of $245 million and ordering period of seven years to provide services and capabilities to USSOCOM and SOF-like OGA organizations. The contract will be a full and open competition set aside for SDVOSBs with a NAICS code of 541330 and size standard of $38.5 million. The PSC is R and requirements include advanced SOF support.

SOF RAPTOR IV Past Performance Questionnaire.

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to SOF RAPTOR IV, newest first.
File Type Posted
Final_Solicitation_Questions_(Updated)_7_Dec2018.pdf PDF
W900KK-19-R-0078_Solicitation_Amendment-3_SF-33_Final_Conformed_07Dec2018.pdf PDF
Att1c-SOFRAPTORIV-PWS-STO-SA_(Amend-3_3Dec2018).pdf PDF
W900KK-19-R-0078_Solicitation_Amendment-2_SF-30_Executed_28Nov2018.pdf PDF
W900KK-19-R-0078_Solicitation_Amendment-3_SF-30_Executed_07Dec2018.pdf PDF
W900KK-19-R-0078_Solicitation_Amendment-1_SF-30_Executed_31Oct2018.pdf PDF
MFR_For_SOF_RAPTOR_IV_Amendment_(0003).pdf PDF
Final_Solicitation_Questions_3Dec2018.pdf PDF
Att13-SOFRAPTORIV-Proposal_Reciept_Form.pdf PDF
Final_Solicitation_Questions_(Updated)_28Nov2018.pdf PDF
W900KK-19-R-0078_Solicitation_Amendment-2__Executed_28Nov2018.pdf PDF
W900KK-19-R-0078_Solicitation_Amendment-2__Conformed_28Nov2018.pdf PDF
Att1c-SOFRAPTORIV-PWS-STO-SA_(26Nov2018).pdf PDF
Att12_SOF_RAPTORIV-Past_Performance_Questionnaire_rev-1.pdf PDF
Att4-SOFRAPTORIV-LaborCategories-Final_Revised_21Nov2018.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Att1a-SOFRAPTORIV-PWS-STO-CRF_(Amend-2_21Nov2018).pdf PDF
Att1b-SOFRAPTORIV-PWS-STO-UWEX_(Amend-2_21Nov2018).pdf PDF
Att7-SOFRAPTORIV-PricingWorkbook-Final_Revised_21Nov2018.xls XLS spreadsheet
Final_Solicitation_Questions_21Nov2018_Released.pdf PDF
Att1d-SOFRAPTORIV-PWS-STO-STS_(Amend-2_21Nov2018).pdf PDF
Att1c-SOFRAPTORIV-PWS-STO-SA_(Amend-2_21Nov2018).pdf PDF
Att1d-SOFRAPTORIV-PWS-STO-STS_(Amend-1_31Oct2018).pdf PDF
W900KK-19-R-0078-Solicitation-Final_(Amendment-1_31Oct2018).pdf PDF
Att1a-SOFRAPTORIV-PWS-STO-CRF_(Amend-1_31Oct2018).pdf PDF
Att1c-SOFRAPTORIV-PWS-STO-SA_(Amend-1_31Oct2018).pdf PDF
Att1b-SOFRAPTORIV-PWS-STO-UWEX_(Amend-1_31Oct2018).pdf PDF
Att2-SOFRAPTORIV-DD254-final(30Oct2018).pdf PDF
Att1d-SOFRAPTORIV-PWS-STO-STS-final(30Oct2018).pdf PDF
Att8-SOFRAPTORIV-SolicitationClarificationForm-final(30Oct2018).doc DOC document
Att9-SOFRAPTORIV-PWS-TO-0001-SetUpPlan-final(30Oct2018).pdf PDF
Att6-SOFRAPTORIV-Example-CDRL-Report-final(30Oct2018).pdf PDF
Att11-_SOF_RAPTOR_IV_Presolicitation_Conference_Q-and-A-final(30Oct2018).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Att1c-SOFRAPTORIV-PWS-STO-SA-final(30Oct2018).pdf PDF
Att1a-SOFRAPTORIV-PWS-STO-CRF-final(30Oct2018).pdf PDF
Att5-SOFRAPTORIV-ProposalAdequacyChecklist-final(30Oct2018).pdf PDF
Att1b-SOFRAPTORIV-PWS-STO-UWEX-final(30Oct2018).pdf PDF
W900KK-19-R-0078-Solicitation-Final(30Oct2018).pdf PDF
Att7-SOFRAPTORIV-PricingWorkbook-final(30Oct2018).xls XLS spreadsheet
Att1-SOFRAPTORIV-_Base-PWS-final(30Oct2018).pdf PDF
Att4-SOFRAPTORIV-LaborCategories-final(30Oct2018).xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Att10-SOFRAPTORIV-Data_Item_Transmittal_form-final(30Oct2018).pdf PDF
Att3-SOFRAPTORIV-QASP-final(30Oct2018).pdf PDF
Show all 42

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

U.S. ARMY CONTRACTING COMMAND-ORLANDO

12211 SCIENCE DRIVE

ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32826-3276

5 Nov 2018

Army Contracting Command – Orlando (ACC-ORL)

SUBJECT: Offeror Past Performance Assessment in Support of Request for Proposal (RFP) Number W900KK-19-R-0078

Dear Sir/Ma’am;

The Program Executive Office for Simulation, Training and Instrumentation (PEO

STRI) is currently conducting a competitive source selection to evaluate offerors on subject RFP. As part of this evaluation, we have requested that the offerors provide information about their past performance on same or similar federal, state or local government or commercial contracts as compared to North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) 541330. You have been identified as the point of contact cited on the enclosure.

Your assessment of their performance is extremely valuable to our evaluation.

Please complete the enclosure and return no later than 15 days after receipt of request or 1 December 2018, whichever occurs first. Your questionnaire may be submitted electronically to steve.i.honda.civ@mail.mil or duane.a.stpeter.civ@mail.mil.

Your cooperation is greatly appreciated. Questions may be directed to POC or the undersigned at 407-380-8444.

Sincerely, DUANE A. ST PETER

Contracting Officer mailto:steve.i.honda.civ@mail.mil mailto:duane.a.stpeter.civ@mail.mil.

PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE FORM

Contractor___________________________ Contract No.:____________________________ Subcontract No. (if applicable):__________________________________________________ POC (Name):_________________________ Title:__________________________________ Agency, Telephone No., Email Address: __________________________________________

The following questions pertain to the contractor’s record of past (within the past three years) and current performance. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of a federal contract. Therefore, it is important that our information be as factual and accurate as possible. Please provide examples and/or explanations (use additional pages if necessary).

The following adjectival ratings shall be used in your response.

Outstanding: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.

Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

Acceptable: Performance meets contractual requirements. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.

Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective.

Unacceptable: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective.

PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)

A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION

Contractor/Company Name/Division:______________________________________________ Address:____________________________________________________________________ Program Identification/Title:_____________________________________________________ Contract Number/Task Order Number:____________________________________________ Contract/Task Order value:_____________________________________________________ Contract Type:_______________________________________________________________ Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):________________ Contract Award Date:__________________________________________________________ Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:_____________________________________ Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:_________________________________

B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE

Name:______________________________ Title:__________________________________ Date:_______________________________ Telephone Number:______________________ Address:___________________________________________________________________ Email Address:______________________________________________________________

PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent)

A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship

Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Good Acceptable Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Comments:__________________________________________________________________

B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).

Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Good Acceptable Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Comments:__________________________________________________________________

C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.

Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Good

Acceptable Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Comments:__________________________________________________________________

D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs (Use this Question on Cost Reimbursement Type Contracts Only).

Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Good Acceptable Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Comments:__________________________________________________________________

E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest.

Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Good Acceptable Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)

Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Comments:__________________________________________________________________

F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.

G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:

Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company? If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact: ________________________________________

H. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:

Organization:________________________________________________________________ Name:______________________________ Title:__________________________________ Date:_______________________________ Telephone Number:______________________ Address:____________________________________________________________________ Email Address:_______________________________________________________________

PART III. RETURN INFORMATION

Please return this completed Questionnaire via email to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter.

Thank you for your assistance.

Signature__________________________________________

Date______________________________________________

Typed or Printed Name_______________________________

Contractor:
Contract No:
Subcontract No if applicable:
Title:
POC Name 1:
POC Name 2:
Agency Telephone No Email Address:
ContractorCompany NameDivision:
Address:
Program IdentificationTitle:
Contract NumberTask Order Number:
ContractTask Order value:
Contract Type 1:
Contract Award Date:
Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date 1:
Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date 2:
Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:
Name:
Title_2:
Date:
Telephone Number:
Address_2:
Email Address:
Comments 1:
Comments 2:
Comments 3:
Comments 4:
Comments 1_2:
Comments 2_2:
Comments 3_2:
Comments 4_2:
Unsatisfactory Explanation must be provided in Comments field below:
Comments 1_3:
Comments 2_3:
Comments 3_3:
Unsatisfactory Explanation must be provided in Comments field below_2:
Comments 1_4:
Comments 2_4:
Comments 3_4:
Unsatisfactory Explanation must be provided in Comments field below_3:
Comments 1_5:
Comments 2_5:
Comments 3_5:
F 1:
F 2:
F 3:
F 4:
Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company If yes please provide the name:
and telephone number of a point of contact:
Respondent Identification Please provide the following information:
Organization:
Title_3:
Name_2:
Telephone Number_2:
Email Address_2:
Date_2:
Typed or Printed Name:
2018-11-05T15:27:34-0500
ST PETER.DUANE.A.1093158802
Prime Contractor Name if different:
Prime Contractor Name:
Check Box3: Off
Check Box4: Off
Check Box5: Off
Check Box6: Off
Box: Off
Check Box7: Off
Check Box8: Off
Check Box9: Off
Check Box10: Off
Check Box11: Off
Check Box12: Off
Check Box13: Off
Check Box14: Off
Check Box15: Off
Check Box16: Off
Check Box17: Off
Check Box18: Off
Check Box19: Off
Check Box20: Off
Check Box21: Off
Check Box22: Off
Check Box23: Off
Check Box24: Off
Check Box25: Off
Check Box26: Off
Telephone:

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .