Att12_SOF_RAPTORIV-Past_Performance_Questionnaire_rev-1.pdf
PDF 349 KB Posted
- Attached to
- SOF RAPTOR IV Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W900KK-19-R-0078
About this file
This document contains a past performance evaluation questionnaire and cover letter related to solicitation number W900KK-19-R-0078 for the SOF RAPTOR IV contract. The U.S. Army Program Executive Office for Simulation, Training, and Instrumentation is conducting a competitive source selection to evaluate offerors. As part of the evaluation, offerors must provide information on past performance of same or similar contracts. The questionnaire is to be completed by a point of contact for the offeror's past performance and returned by December 14, 2018 to assist in the evaluation. The SOF RAPTOR IV contract is a flexible and responsive indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity contract with a ceiling of $245 million and a period of performance of seven years. It is a full and open competition set aside for Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Businesses. The North American Industry Classification System code is 541330 for engineering services. The contract will provide services and capability to United States Special Operations Command forces and other government agencies conducting counterterrorism, counter narcoterrorism, and unconventional warfare missions.
Att12 SOF RAPTORIV-Past Performance Questionnaire rev-1. Updates due date to 14Dec2018 to match solicitation.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 42
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
U.S. ARMY CONTRACTING COMMAND-ORLANDO
12211 SCIENCE DRIVE
ORLANDO, FLORIDA 32826-3276
27 Nov 2018
Army Contracting Command – Orlando (ACC-ORL)
SUBJECT: Offeror Past Performance Assessment in Support of Request for Proposal (RFP) Number W900KK-19-R-0078
Dear Sir/Ma’am;
The Program Executive Office for Simulation, Training and Instrumentation (PEO STRI) is currently conducting a competitive source selection to evaluate offerors on subject RFP. As part of this evaluation, we have requested that the offerors provide information about their past performance on same or similar federal, state or local government or commercial contracts as compared to North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) 541330. You have been identified as the point of contact cited on the enclosure.
Your assessment of their performance is extremely valuable to our evaluation.
Please complete the enclosure and return no later than 15 days after receipt of request or 14 December 2018, whichever occurs first. Your questionnaire may be submitted electronically to steve.i.honda.civ@mail.mil or duane.a.stpeter.civ@mail.mil.
Your cooperation is greatly appreciated. Questions may be directed to POC or the undersigned at 407-380-8444.
Sincerely, DUANE A. ST PETER
Contracting Officer mailto:steve.i.honda.civ@mail.mil mailto:duane.a.stpeter.civ@mail.mil.
PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE FORM
Contractor___________________________ Contract No.:____________________________ Subcontract No. (if applicable):__________________________________________________ POC (Name):_________________________ Title:__________________________________ Agency, Telephone No., Email Address: __________________________________________
The following questions pertain to the contractor’s record of past (within the past three years) and current performance. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of a federal contract. Therefore, it is important that our information be as factual and accurate as possible. Please provide examples and/or explanations (use additional pages if necessary).
The following adjectival ratings shall be used in your response.
Outstanding: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with few, if any, minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Good: Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some requirements that benefit the end user. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Acceptable: Performance meets contractual requirements. Work was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were satisfactory.
Marginal: Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the contractor has either not yet identified corrective actions or the corrective actions taken appear only marginally effective.
Unacceptable: Performance does not meet most contractual requirements. Serious problems with contractor performance were experienced for which the corrective actions were ineffective.
PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)
A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
Contractor/Company Name/Division:______________________________________________ Address:____________________________________________________________________ Program Identification/Title:_____________________________________________________ Contract Number/Task Order Number:____________________________________________ Contract/Task Order value:_____________________________________________________ Contract Type:_______________________________________________________________ Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):________________ Contract Award Date:__________________________________________________________ Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:_____________________________________ Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:_________________________________
B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE
Name:______________________________ Title:__________________________________ Date:_______________________________ Telephone Number:______________________ Address:___________________________________________________________________ Email Address:______________________________________________________________
PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent)
A. Compliance of Products, Services, Documents, and Related Deliverables to Specification Requirements and Standards of Good Workmanship
Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Good Acceptable Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Comments:__________________________________________________________________
B. Effectiveness of Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).
Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Good Acceptable Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Comments:__________________________________________________________________
C. Timeliness of Performance for Services and Product Deliverables.
Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Good
Acceptable Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Comments:__________________________________________________________________
D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Estimated Costs (Use this Question on Cost Reimbursement Type Contracts Only).
Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Good Acceptable Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Comments:__________________________________________________________________
E. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest.
Outstanding (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Good Acceptable Marginal (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below)
Unsatisfactory (Explanation must be provided in Comments field below) Comments:__________________________________________________________________
F. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.
G. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:
Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company? If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact: ________________________________________
H. Respondent Identification. Please provide the following information:
Organization:________________________________________________________________ Name:______________________________ Title:__________________________________ Date:_______________________________ Telephone Number:______________________ Address:____________________________________________________________________ Email Address:_______________________________________________________________
PART III. RETURN INFORMATION
Please return this completed Questionnaire via email to the Contracting Officer identified in the cover letter.
Thank you for your assistance.
Signature__________________________________________
Date______________________________________________
Typed or Printed Name_______________________________
| Contractor: | |
| Contract No: | |
| Subcontract No if applicable: | |
| Title: | |
| POC Name 1: | |
| POC Name 2: | |
| Agency Telephone No Email Address: | |
| ContractorCompany NameDivision: | |
| Address: | |
| Program IdentificationTitle: | |
| Contract NumberTask Order Number: | |
| ContractTask Order value: | |
| Contract Type 1: | |
| Contract Award Date: | |
| Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date 1: | |
| Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date 2: | |
| Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased: | |
| Name: | |
| Title_2: | |
| Date: | |
| Telephone Number: | |
| Address_2: | |
| Email Address: | |
| Comments 1: | |
| Comments 2: | |
| Comments 3: | |
| Comments 4: | |
| Comments 1_2: | |
| Comments 2_2: | |
| Comments 3_2: | |
| Comments 4_2: | |
| Unsatisfactory Explanation must be provided in Comments field below: | |
| Comments 1_3: | |
| Comments 2_3: | |
| Comments 3_3: | |
| Unsatisfactory Explanation must be provided in Comments field below_2: | |
| Comments 1_4: | |
| Comments 2_4: | |
| Comments 3_4: | |
| Unsatisfactory Explanation must be provided in Comments field below_3: | |
| Comments 1_5: | |
| Comments 2_5: | |
| Comments 3_5: | |
| F 1: | |
| F 2: | |
| F 3: | |
| F 4: | |
| Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company If yes please provide the name: | |
| and telephone number of a point of contact: | |
| Respondent Identification Please provide the following information: | |
| Organization: | |
| Title_3: | |
| Name_2: | |
| Telephone Number_2: | |
| Email Address_2: | |
| Date_2: | |
| Typed or Printed Name: | |
| 2018-11-27T11:05:58-0500 | |
| ST PETER.DUANE.A.1093158802 |
| Prime Contractor Name if different: |
| Prime Contractor Name: |
| Check Box3: Off |
| Check Box4: Off |
| Check Box5: Off |
| Check Box6: Off |
| Box: Off |
| Check Box7: Off |
| Check Box8: Off |
| Check Box9: Off |
| Check Box10: Off |
| Check Box11: Off |
| Check Box12: Off |
| Check Box13: Off |
| Check Box14: Off |
| Check Box15: Off |
| Check Box16: Off |
| Check Box17: Off |
| Check Box18: Off |
| Check Box19: Off |
| Check Box20: Off |
| Check Box21: Off |
| Check Box22: Off |
| Check Box23: Off |
| Check Box24: Off |
| Check Box25: Off |
| Check Box26: Off |
| Telephone: |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .