ATTACHMENT_15_TECHNICAL_VOLUME_CROSS_REFERENCE_MATRIX.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 38 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W900KK-19-R-0006
About this file
This document contains a technical cross-reference matrix for a federal solicitation seeking proposals for the Modernizing Instrumentation Solutions for Test and Evaluation (MISTE) program.
The solicitation involves providing test instrumentation systems and network solutions across multiple technical subfactors. Offerors are required to describe their manufacturing capabilities, proposed MISTE Test Instrumentation Systems Enterprise solution and program management approach, as well as technical approaches for a System of Systems Controlled Environment Test Infrastructure atmospheric conditions enhancement and a Test Network Modernization electronic proving ground network. The matrix outlines proposal requirements and evaluation criteria for offerings involving facilities, quality plans, integrated master schedules, software design, and approaches ensuring reusability, commonality and interoperability of solutions. The Department of the Army Materiel Command Contracting Command Orlando Contracting Center is the issuing agency. The closing date to submit proposals was not specified.
MISTE Technical Volume Cross Reference Matrix_Final
View the file
Other files
Show 40 more
50 files listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Tech Factor SF 1 Mfg Capability
| RFP Section L - Instructions to Offerors | RFP Section M - Evaluation Criteria | This Area is Reserved for Contractor's Notes | |||
| Factor 1 Technical | Factor 1 Technical | ||||
| Subfactor L.1.1 – Manufacturing Capability. This subfactor evaluates the offeror’s Manufacturing Capability. The Offeror will provide information to describe and substantiate the following: | M.1.1 – Subfactor Manufacturing Capability: The Government will evaluate the offeror’s approach to meet the Manufacturing Capabilities for the basic contract period and all option years. Marginal levels of overall corporate capability and capacity could indicate a lack of organic abilities concerning mission requirements and may result in the entire proposal receiving an unfavorable rating and/or being eliminated from the competitive range The Government will evaluate this Subfactor as follows: | ||||
| Contractor's Proposal | |||||
| Subfactors | Subfactors | Volume I Technical | Section and Page Number | Paragraph | Contractor Subfactor Notes/Other References |
| L.1.1.1 The offeror shall detail the facilities, tools, equipment, special test instrumentation, capital equipment and other corporate resources/assets necessary to execute MISTE requirements and the extent to which the offeror currently possesses these assets per MISTE Base SOW Sections 3.5.2 and 3.5.14. | M.1.1.1 The Government will evaluate the extent to which the Offeror’s facilities and manufacturing assets are adequate to execute current and future size, scope and complexity of MISTE delivery order requirements. | ||||
| L.1.1.2 The offeror shall describe their manufacturing processes and capacity to |
manage multiple, complex, simultaneous delivery orders for test and evaluation systems in multiple geographic locations worldwide per MISTE Base SOW sections 3.5.2. The offeror shall identify current production capabilities, capacity, facility usage rates and ability to manage MISTE’s expected annual volume of 3 delivery orders and satisfy surge and scalability requirements represented by an additional 1-2 delivery orders per MISTE Base SOW section 3.5.14.
| M.1.1.2 The Government will evaluate the extent to which the Offeror’s manufacturing capabilities are suitable to meet MISTE’s expected annual volume to concurrently satisfy at least 3 unique, technically complex test instrumentation system DO’s with the ability to surge an additional 1-2 orders. | |
| L.1.1.3 The offeror shall present the status of current quality certifications and provide a proposed Quality Program Plan (QPP) per MISTE Base SOW Sections 3.4 and 3.5.15 and DI-QCIC-81722 to be used throughout the execution of MISTE delivery orders. The offeror shall describe how possessing these certifications and the proposed QPP helps to reduce programmatic risks and leads to high quality, interoperability, commonality and reusability across all delivery orders. | M.1.1.3 The Government will evaluate the extent to which the Offeror’s quality certifications and proposed Quality Program Plan (QPP) reduce programmatic risks and lead to improved quality, interoperability, commonality and reusability across all delivery orders. |
Tech Factor SF 2 TISE
| RFP Section L - Instructions to Offerors | RFP Section M - Evaluation Criteria | This Area is Reserved for Contractor's Notes | |||
| Factor 1 Technical | Factor 1 Technical | ||||
| Subfactor L.1.2 - Proposed Delivery Order MISTE Test Instrumentation Systems Enterprise (TISE) Solution and the offeror’s Program Management Approach. This subfactor evaluates the offeror’s proposed MISTE TISE Solution and the offeror’s Program Management Approach. The offeror will provide information to describe and substantiate the following: | M1.2 Subfactor Proposed Test Instrumentation Systems Enterprise (TISE) Solution and Proposed Program Management Approach: The Government will evaluate the offeror’s Proposed Test Instrumentation Systems Enterprise (TISE) Solution and Proposed Program Management Approach, including proposed MISTE TISE SOW. The Government will evaluate this Subfactor as follows: | ||||
| Contractor's Proposal | |||||
| Subfactors | Subfactors | Volume I Technical | Section and Page Number | Paragraph | Contractor Subfactor Notes/Other References |
| L.1.2.1 MISTE TISE Solution: The offeror shall present their proposed solution to implement the MISTE TISE that focuses on achieving enterprise approach objectives of commonality, interoperability and reusability, to achieve efficiencies and risk reduction. The offeror shall propose a MISTE TISE concept of operations that complies with the MISTE Base SOW Sections 1.3 and 3.0 (including sub-sections). | M.1.2.1 MISTE TISE Solution: The Government will evaluate the extent to which the proposed MISTE TISE solution meets the objectives of achieving an enterprise approach to delivering test instrumentation systems resulting in significant efficiencies and risk reductions realized over successive delivery orders. The Government will evaluate the extent to which the proposed TISE concept of operations provides benefit in the development of test instrumentation capabilities across the enterprise. The Government will evaluate the extent to which the proposed MISTE TISE concept of operations is compliant with the MISTE Base SOW. The Government will evaluate the extent to which the concept of operations is innovative, user-friendly, administratively efficient, and effective to implement and maintain. | ||||
| L.1.2.2 Program Management: The offeror shall present their planned program management approach to address an expected volume of no less than 3 delivery orders, methodologies and internal controls employed, that ensures full integration of MISTE Program objectives and that efforts are fully coordinated with the Government to ensure delivery order requirements are achieved at the appropriate quality standards and that products are delivered within cost and schedule requirements in accordance with MISTE Base SOW Section 3.2 and 3.4. | M.1.2.2 MISTE Program Management: The Government will evaluate the extent to which the proposed program management approach reflects best practices recognized within international guides such as the ANSI/PMI 99-001-2008 and IEEE 1490-2011 Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK) and the Defense Acquisition Guidebook (DAG) Chapter 1, and is otherwise considered realistic, credible, verifiable and monitorable. The Government will evaluate the extent to which the adaptation of accepted industry PM standards ensures seamless and full integration of MISTE Program objectives to make certain delivery order requirements are achieved at the appropriate quality standards and that products are delivered within cost and schedule requirements. | ||||
| L.1.2.3 Program Management: The offeror shall detail how the proposed Program Management Approach meets or exceeds the compliance requirements of MISTE Base SOW Section 3.3 and other applicable MISTE Base SOW and contract and DO requirements. | M.1.2.3 MISTE Program Management: The Government will evaluate the extent to which the proposed Program Management Approach meets or exceeds an enterprise management approach to efficiently and effectively address future testing capability requirements. The extent to which the Offeror’s approach assists the Government in making informed decisions on future development and best value procurements of test instrumentation capabilities. | ||||
| L.1.2.4 Proposed DO MISTE TISE SOW: For the TISE solution, the offeror shall submit a proposed DO MISTE TISE SOW (per DoD MIL-HDBK-245D SOW) listed in the MISTE Base SOW Goals and Objectives stated at Section 1.2 and further reflected in Sections 3, 3.1, 3.1.1, 3.1.2, 3.1.3, 3.3.1, 3.3.1.1, 3.3.1.2, 3.3.1.3, 3.3.1.4, and 3.3.1.5. The proposed MISTE TISE SOW shall include a separate section for all MISTE Program Management activities stated at 3.2, 3.3, and 3.4. This proposal submission shall include the Offeror’s proposed Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) per DI-MGMT-82228, Contractor’s Data Management Plan (CDMP). The Offeror’s proposed solution shall be UNCLASSIFIED. The Offeror’s proposed SOW shall identify the requirement to deliver Data Item Description (DID) DI-MGMT-80227, Contractors Progress, Status and Management Report per MISTE Base SOW section 3.4 and DID DI-MGMT-81642 Small Business Subcontractor Report and DI-MGMT-32041A Small Business Utilization Report, per MISTE Base SOW 3.4.8. The offeror shall complete Section I clause 252.227-7013 Rights In Technical Data-Non-Commercial Items with regard to any assertions regarding Data Rights to be included in the proposal. | M.1.2.4 Proposed DO MISTE TISE SOW: The Government will evaluate the extent to which the offeror’s DO MISTE TISE SOW integrates the Base SOW requirements and data deliverables specified for submission during performance. The Government will evaluate the extent to which the DO MISTE TISE SOW is comprehensive, credible, and accurately reflects the requirements referenced for compliance. The Government will evaluate the extent to which the Offeror’s proposed Contractor’s Data Management Plan (CDMP) CDRL DI-MGMT-82228 is thoroughly documented, executable, efficient, and intuitive from a user perspective and ensures the Government will fully achieve the intended purposes and objectives for establishing the TISE. The Government will evaluate the extent to which the offeror’s technical solution relies upon Rights In Technical Data. |
Tech Factor SF 3 SCETI
| RFP Section L - Instructions to Offeror's | RFP Section M - Evaluation Criteria | This Area is Reserved for Contractor's Notes | |||
| Factor 1 Technical | Factor 1 Technical | ||||
| Subfactor 1.3 – System of Systems Controlled Environment Test Infrastructure (SCETI) Atmospheric Conditions Enhancement (ACE). This subfactor evaluates the offeror’s SCETI ACE technical approach. The offer will provide information to describe and substantiate the following: | M1.3 Subfactor System of Systems Controlled Environment Test Infrastructure (SCETI) Atmospheric Conditions Enhancement (ACE): This subfactor evaluates the offeror’s Delivery Order for System of Systems Controlled Environment Test Infrastructure (SCETI) Atmospheric Conditions Enhancement (ACE). The Government will evaluate this Subfactor as follows: | ||||
| Contractor's Proposal | |||||
| Subfactors | Subfactors | Volume I Technical | Section and Page Number | Paragraph | Contractor Subfactor Notes/Other References |
| L.1.3.1 The offeror shall detail the elements of reusability, commonality and interoperability to deliver a modernized SCETI ACE test instrumentation system utilizing effective implementation of the MISTE TISE that ensures a survivable, reliable, and maintainable test instrumentation capability that meets the requirements of the DO SCETI ACE SOW Sections 3.2.2 and 3.2.3. | M.1.3.1 The Government will evaluate the extent to which the proposal supports the elements of reusability, commonality and interoperability to deliver a SCETI ACE test instrumentation system utilizing effective implementation of their MISTE TISE concept that ensures a workable end product that is survivable, reliable, and maintainable test instrumentation system and meets the requirements detailed in the DO SCETI ACE SOW and SCETI ACE Performance Specification. | ||||
| L.1.3.2 The offeror shall develop a detailed Integrated Master Plan (IMP) and Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) supporting the DO SCETI ACE SOW delivery requirements and in accordance with the MISTE Base SOW Section 3.4.2 and DO SCETI ACE SOW Section 3.1.1. | M.1.3.2 The Government will evaluate the extent to which the Offeror provides an achievable IMP with a detailed account of all tasks of the Delivery Order and supports the processes/tools identified in MISTE Base SOW Section 3.4.2 and Table 3.2-1. The Government will evaluate the degree to which the proposed IMP is directly traceable to an IMS activities that provides the detailed execution of events by accurately representing the proposed approach, which can be performed within cost, schedule and risk constraints to deliver a successful end product. | ||||
| L.1.3.3 The offeror shall develop a detailed technical approach to generate snow and fog in Degraded Visual Environment (DVE) conditions. The Offeror shall describe how the selected Atmospheric Measuring equipment (hardware solution) will produce measurements to characterize DVE conditions. The technical approach shall include a plan to produce and measure the characteristics described in the SCETI ACE Performance Specification. Relevant sections include DO SCETI ACE SOW Section 3.2.1.1.1 and SCETI ACE Performance Specification Sections 3.2, 3.3 and 3.4. | M.1.3.3 The Government will evaluate the adequacy and feasibility of the Offeror’s approach for snow and fog generation in Degraded Visual Environment (DVE) conditions. The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s technical approach for measuring atmospheric conditions in the DVE using the proposed Atmospheric Measuring equipment including the extent to which the technical approach accurately captures/identifies and categorizes risks and provides a credible approach to reducing the technical, performance risk and cost risks of the Delivery Order. | ||||
| L.1.3.4 The offeror shall describe the proposed approach to software (SW) design (software solution) for integrating the snow and fog systems and Atmospheric Measuring equipment in SCETI ACE. The offeror shall identify which TENA-compliant Government SW products shall be reused, shall identify any new SW development required, and shall explain the approach to integrating subsystems and data acquisition systems into the core control software. Relevant Performance Specification sections include DO SCETI ACE Performance Specification Sections 3.5, 3.5.2 and 3.5.3. The offeror shall complete Section I clause 252.227-7013 Rights In Technical Data-NonCommercial Items with regard to any assertions regarding Data Rights to be included in the proposal. | M.1.3.4 The Government will evaluate the extent to which the offeror’s approach to software design for integrating snow and fog systems and Atmospheric Measuring Equipment with the existing SCETI ACE architecture while ensuring the end product is survivable, reliable, and maintainable. The Government will evaluate the extent to which the offeror makes use of TENA-compliant Government SW products and understanding any new SW development required. The Government will evaluate the offeror’s approach for integrating subsystems and data acquisition systems into the core control software for feasibility, credibility and ease of implementation. The Government will evaluate the extent to which the offeror’s technical solution relies upon Rights In Technical Data. |
Tech Factor SF 4 TNM
| RFP Section L - Instructions to Offerors | RFP Section M - Evaluation Criteria | This Area is Reserved for Contractor's Notes | |||
| Factor 1 Technical | Factor 1 Technical | ||||
| Subfactor 1.4 – Test Network Modernization (TNM) Electronic Proving Ground (EPG). This subfactor evaluates the offeror’s DO TNM EPG technical approach. The offer will provide information to describe and substantiate the following: | M.1.4 Subfactor Delivery Order Test Network Modernization (TNM) Electronic Proving Grounds (EPG): This subfactor evaluates the offeror’s technical approach for the Test Network Modernization (TNM) Electronic Proving Grounds (EPG). The Government will evaluate this Subfactor as follows: | ||||
| Contractor's Proposal | |||||
| Subfactors | Subfactors | Volume I Technical | Section and Page Number | Paragraph | Contractor Subfactor Notes/Other References |
| L.1.4.1 The offeror shall describe the technical and management approach to the test network concept design to satisfy the DO TNM EPG SOW and System Performance Specifications for the Test Instrumentation Systems Network – Enterprise (TISN-EN) Test Center Area Network Design & Implementation (TCAN-DI), Test Network Modernization per TNM EPG SOW Sections 3.1, 3.4, 3.5, and 3.8. The offeror shall provide their detailed approach to all the following activities: (1) proposed network design and composition, (2) equipment delivery, (3) installation process, (4) configuration, (5) integration, (6) testing and (7) training to meet the technical requirements. | M.1.4.1 The Government will evaluate the extent to which proposal identifies and incorporates all of the required test network design concept requirements (to include (1) proposed network design and composition, (2) equipment delivery, (3) installation process, (4) configuration, (5) integration, (6) testing and (7) training to meet the technical requirements) and demonstrates a clear understanding of technical features involved in solving the perceived challenges in meeting the Statement of Work and System Performance Specifications for the Test Instrumentation Systems Network – Enterprise (TISN-EN) Test Center Area Network Design & Implementation (TCAN-DI), Test Network Modernization for Electronic Proving Grounds at Fort Huachuca, AZ technical requirements, including the extent to which the technical approach accurately captures/identifies and categorizes risks and provides a credible approach to reducing the technical, performance risk and cost risks of the Delivery Order. | ||||
| L.1.4.2 The offeror shall develop a detailed Integrated Master Plan (IMP) and Integrated Master Schedule (IMS) supporting the DO TNM EPG SOW 3.2.1 delivery requirements and in accordance with the MISTE Base SOW Section 3.4.2. | M.1.4.2 The Government will evaluate the extent to which the Offeror provides a credible IMP with a detailed account of all tasks of the Delivery Order and supports the processes/tools identified in MISTE Base SOW 3.2-1 and is traceable to an IMS that provides for detailed execution of events by accurately representing the proposed approach, which can be performed within cost, schedule and risk constraints to deliver a successful end product. | ||||
| L.1.4.3 The offeror shall describe their approach to multi-phased installation, configuration and integration in order to maintain the existing EPG Test Network operational with minimal (desired at less than 60 minutes per day) interruption to day-today operations and downtime in accordance with DO TNM EPG SOW Section 3.2.4.2 and corresponding Appendix A sections A.1(3) and A.2(9). The offeror shall fully detail the proposed equipment configuration, installation, integration strategies to maintain minimal disruption to the existing network while maximizing connectivity for EPG test customers. | M.1.4.3 The Government will evaluate the extent to which the multi-phased approach is feasible and executable and reduces Government’s level of risk in ensuring concurrently maintaining the existing EPG Test Network operational with minimal downtime (less than 60 minutes per day) to allow Test Customer’s availability to the Test Network and the extent to which the offeror has provided sufficient detail in the proposed equipment configuration, installation, integration strategies to maintain minimal disruption to the existing network while maximizing connectivity for EPG test customers. | ||||
| L.1.4.4 The offeror shall detail the elements of reusability, commonality and interoperability to deliver a modernized test network at EPG utilizing effective implementation of the TISE that ensures a survivable, reliable, and maintainable test network capability that meets the requirements and specifications of the DO TNM EPG SOW Sections 1.1, and 3. | M.1.4.4 The Government will evaluate the extent to which the proposal supports the elements of reusability, commonality and interoperability to deliver a modernized test network at EPG utilizing effective implementation of their MISTE TISE concept that ensures a workable end product that is survivable, reliable, and maintainable test instrumentation system and meets the requirements. | ||||
| L.1.4.5 The offeror shall describe the network testing, and troubleshooting, correcting and validation approach that will verify that the proposed test network complies with the technical requirements of the System Performance Specifications for the Test Instrumentation Systems Network – Enterprise (TISN-EN) per DO TNM EPG SOW Sections 3.4.2, 3.5, 3.8.5, and Appendix A, A.3 item 8 and A.6 item n. The offeror shall describe their approach to ensure ongoing system monitoring and verification processes are provided throughout the 12-month test period until final acceptance of the system by the Government. The offeror shall complete Section I clause 252.227-7013 Rights In Technical Data-Non-Commercial Items with regard to any assertions regarding Data Rights to be included in the proposal. | M.1.4.5 The Government will evaluate the extent to which the offeror’s proposed Network Testing approach complies with the System Performance Specifications for the Test Instrumentation Systems Network – Enterprise (TISN-EN). The Government will evaluate the extent to which the approach is verifiable, ensures system monitoring and verification processes are in-place until final acceptance of the system. The Government will evaluate the extent to which the offeror’s technical solution relies upon Rights In Technical Data. |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .