Attachment_0005_-_IT_PP_Questionnaire.doc
DOC document 105 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Detroit Arsenal Information Technology Services
- Solicitation number
- W56HZV-16-R-L102
About this file
Updated Attachment 0005
View the file
Other files
Show all 27
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Past Performance Assessment Questionnaire Please provide your candid response to the following questions. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore it is important that your information be as factual and accurate as possible. If you do not have the appropriate knowledge with the company in question, please forward this questionnaire to the person who does. Upon completion of this questionnaire, please forward by electronic email to Melissa Bays, melissa.c.bays.civ@mail.mil by 17 April 2017. Thank you for your assistance.
PART I - IDENTIFICATION (To be completed by the Offeror)
A. RELEVANT CONTRACT
Contractor/Company Name/Division:
Address:
Program Identification/Title:
Contract/Task Order Number:
Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):
Contract Award Date:
Contract Period of Performance End Date:
Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion:
Brief Description of the Relevant Contract Scope:
B. OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number:
FAX Number:
Address:
E-mail Address:
PART II - EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent)
RATING SCALE & DEFINITIONS
Table 1 identifies the rating scale and descriptions. Please apply the rating that most closely matches your assessment for each area of consideration listed below. Please include a written narrative for each rating applied, utilizing the adjectival rating definition in Table 1.
Table 1
1. To what extent was the Contractor able to recruit and maintain qualified and reliable personnel for the duration of the contract? Was recruitment timely? Was turnover rate low?
Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Too soon to tell
Not Applicable
Comments:
For any adverse issues give your assessment of the extent to which the contractor was at fault (e.g. mostly attributable to contractor, evenly attributable to contractor and customer/end user, only some somewhat attributable to contractor) and your assessment of the extent to which customer/end user was at fault (e.g. changes to the specification requirements, unrealistic or ambiguous specification requirements, etc.) or other factors beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the contractor.
2. To what extent was the Contractor able to manage the overall performance of the contract? Include items such as, planning and scheduling.
Exceptional Very Good
Satisfactory Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Too soon to tell
Not Applicable
Comments:
For any adverse issues give your assessment of the extent to which the contractor was at fault (e.g. mostly attributable to contractor, evenly attributable to contractor and customer/end user, only some somewhat attributable to contractor) and your assessment of the extent to which customer/end user was at fault (e.g. delays by the customer/end user, changes to the specification requirements, unrealistic or ambiguous specification requirements, etc.) or other factors beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the contractor (e.g. unusually severe weather or default of a subcontractor beyond the control of both the Contractor and subcontractor).
3. How would you rate the Contractor’s ability to demonstrate a cooperative, business-like attitude and concern with the interests of your agency or company?
Exceptional Very Good
Satisfactory Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Too soon to tell
Not Applicable
Comments:
For any adverse issues give your assessment of the extent to which the contractor was at fault (e.g. mostly attributable to contractor, evenly attributable to contractor and customer/end user, only some somewhat attributable to contractor) and your assessment of the extent to which customer/end user was at fault (e.g. changes to the specification requirements, unrealistic or ambiguous specification requirements, etc.) or other factors beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the contractor.
4. General Comments.
Any additional information, which your organization deems relevant or important, will be welcome by our evaluation team. Please provide any other relevant or important performance information.
Comments:
PART III - RESPONDENT IDENTIFICATION
Please provide a point of contact who compiled or completed this questionnaire and who, if needed, may be contacted by our evaluation team regarding the information provided in this questionnaire.
Organization:
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number:
Address:
Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
Once Filled In, this document is considered
Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .