The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.
Run-Off TRR Checklist
28 Jun 2016
Distribution Statement A – Approved for Public Release; distribution unlimited
UNCLASSIFIED
Purpose The Run-Off TRR process for the Common Robotic System (Individual) (CRS(I)) Program Management (PM) will assess the readiness of the CRS(I) to enter the formal Run-Off testing event. The Run-Off Test Readiness Review will assesses the status of planning for and capability to conduct a given test event, to include available resources and other requirements. This process allows key CRS(I) leadership and stakeholders to assess whether CRS(I) test systems, personnel, ranges, and test resources are ready to be committed to government testing with safe and manageable risks. The process begins with a meeting with the contractor and concludes with a formal government TRR meeting and a recommendation which is provided to the CRS(I) Product Managers to proceed (or not) into government testing.
Completion of Checklist The Run-Off TRR Checklist will be considered completed when the items in the Checklist have been satisfactorily completed, key issues addressed, and there are no unresolved items.
UNCLASSIFIED
Attachment 0007
UNCLASSIFIED Page 4 of 4
Run-Off Test Readiness Review (TRR) Checklist
System Test Readiness
| Section |
| Criteria |
| Responsibility |
| Status |
| Comment/Mitigation |
| 1.0 |
| Introductions/Purpose |
| 1.1 |
| Test purpose |
| PDM Test |
| 2.0 |
| System Configuration |
| Contractor |
| 2.1 |
| Configuration of the system is consistent with the defined product baseline. |
| 3.0 |
| CDRLs Status |
| Contractor |
| 3.1 |
| All CDRL submissions and updates required by Run-Off TRR have been delivered. |
| 4.0 |
| System-Level Verification Test Results/Corrective Actions |
| Contractor |
| 4.1 |
| Break In tests are complete |
| 4.3 |
| All known residual catastrophic failures and safety issues identified during break in testing have been corrected. |
5.0
| 5.1 |
| Government Inspection Results/Certifications |
| 5.2 |
| The systems have been inspected (not tested) for adherence to the requirements in the contract. The systems must pass the inspections for these requirements to be deemed acceptable for test. Some of these inspections will need to occur during build. |
| DCMA/Contractor |
| 5.3 |
| Systems have been configured IAW (VEASAM) and prepared for shipment. |
| Contractor |
| 5.4 |
| All non-system hardware. The required timing of deliveries is specified in Section F. |
| Contractor |
| 5.5 |
| Kits have been inspected, are complete, and ready for shipment IAW VEASAM |
| DCMA/Contractor |
| 5.6 |
| System certifications, and analyses have been completed and submitted |
| DCMA/Contractor |
| 5.7 |
| Unapproved Hazardous Materials are not present in the CRS(I), IAW the materials detailed section of the contract addressing Hazardous Materials Management.UNCLASSIFIED |
DCMA/Contractor
6.0
| 6.1 |
| Test Support |
| Contractor |
| 6.2 |
| FSRs /SMEs are identified and ready to support testing at designated locations as identified in Attachment (VEASAM). |
| 6.3 |
| Logistics limitations and risks associated with them have been identified and mitigated. |
| 6.4 |
| All BII items are complete and ready for shipment with the system. |
| 6.5 |
| Tester Training packages/plans have been reviewed, approved and available. |
| 6.6 |
| Operators’ Manuals are complete, delivered, and adequate to support tests. |
| 6.7 |
| Vendor has addressed parts support strategy for each of the test sites identified in the VEASAM |
7.0
| 7.1 |
| Safety Assessment Reports/Concerns |
| Contractor |
| 7.2 |
| Contractors Safety Assessment has been completed and accepted by the Program Office |
| 7.3 |
| High voltage electrical safety for testing addressed and covered in both the tester training courses and the operators manuals. |
8.0
| 8.1 |
| System Delivery Schedule |
| Contractor |
| 8.2 |
| Delivery schedule has been provided and is on track with contract requirements. |
