Atch4-PastPerformanceQuestionnaire.doc
DOC document 52 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W564KV12R0017
About this file
Attachment 4- Past Performance Questionnaire
View the file
Other files
Show all 30
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE FOR
SOLICITATION W564KV-12-R-0017
Dear Sir or Madam:
1. The Theater Contracting Center (TCC), Kaiserslautern, Germany is currently evaluating proposals for US Army Garrison- Stuttgart Installation Maintenance contract under RFP W564KV-12-R-0017.
2. As part of the source selection process, potential offerors’ past performance is being evaluated. The TCC would appreciate your time and effort in completing the attached questionnaire. Please return completed questionnaires to Ms. Ann Peternal-Boyle at ann.m.peternalboyle.civ@mail.mil, Mr. Sean DeHaas at sean.e.dehaas.civ@mail.mil and Mr. Peter Deibert at peter.e.deibert.civ@mail.mil no later than 3 December 2012.
3. Please use the rating system and definitions herein to complete the Past Performance Questionnaire.
4. Comment freely in the spaces below the questions or on a separate sheet of paper if necessary. Both favorable and unfavorable comments are welcome. We request comments for ratings above or below Satisfactory.
5. The time and effort in completing this questionnaire is greatly appreciated.
Thank you in advance for your assistance.
Sincerely, //S//
Peter E. Deibert
Contracting Officer
PAST PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE
Message to the respondent: This questionnaire is provided to assist the Theater Contracting Center in the past performance evaluation of offerors pertaining to a competitive acquisition that will result in the award of federal contracts. Therefore, it is important that your information be as factual, accurate and as complete as possible to preclude the need for follow-up queries by the evaluators. In an effort to expedite receipt of the requested information, the Contracting Office respectfully requests that you do not mail hard copies. Instead, please e-mail the completed questionnaire(s) to ann.m.peternalboyle.civ@mail.mil, sean.e.dehaas.civ@mail.mil and peter.e.deibert.civ@mail.mil.
PART I. (To be completed by the Offeror)
A. CONTRACT IDENTIFICATION
Contractor/Company Name/Division:
Address:
Program Identification/Title:
Government or Non-government Contract
Contract Number:
Contract Type:
Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):
CAGE Code:
Contract Award Date:
Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion Date:
Nature of the Contractual Effort or Items Purchased:
B. IDENTIFICATION OF OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number:
FAX Number:
Address:
E-mail Address:
PART II. EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent)
Check appropriate box and provide comments based on the following ratings/definitions.
| Rating |
| Definition |
| Exceptional |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government's benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| Very Good |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government's benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| Satisfactory |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| Marginal |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
A. Compliance with requirements in the Performance Work Statement.
Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Comments:
B. Adherence to contract schedules, including timely submittal of documentation and all administrative aspects of performance, required throughout contract performance
Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Comments:
C. Overall effectiveness of Contract/Project Management (to include use and control of subcontractors).
Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Comments:
D. Effectiveness in Forecasting and Controlling Project Cost.
Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Comments:
E. Ability to adapt to changes in the contract requirement.
Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Comments:
F. Commitment to Customer Satisfaction and Business-like Concern for its Customers’ Interest.
Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Comments:
G. Overall Satisfaction.
Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Comments:
H. General Comments. Provide any other relevant performance information.
Exceptional
Very Good
Satisfactory
Marginal
Unsatisfactory
Comments:
I. Other Information Sources. Please provide the following information:
Are you aware of other relevant past efforts by this company?
If yes, please provide the name and telephone number of a point of contact:
PART III. (To be completed by Respondent)
A. RESPONDENT IDENTIFICATION
Organization:
Name:
Title:
Date:
Telephone Number
Address:
Fax Number:
E-mail Address:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .