Attachment_0004_GEN VI PLS Self Scoring Matrix.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 20 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W519TC-26-R-AHRS
About this file
This is a self-scoring matrix template designed for vendors to evaluate their own compliance with the technical requirements for the GEN VI Personnel Lifecycle Support (PLS) IDIQ contract. The matrix guides vendors through a structured assessment of their qualified contracts (QCs) against specific evaluation criteria outlined in Section L and Section M of the draft RFP.
The matrix requires vendors to demonstrate minimum qualifications across four mandatory task categories: Overall QC quality, Training and Development, Sustainment (including Well-Being, Counseling, and Family Community Programs), and two additional elective task categories from the PLS portfolio. For each QC submission, vendors must verify that project summaries adequately address criteria a-e and identify the customer, provide technical relevancy narratives with appropriate NAICS codes or task mapping documentation, and ensure the overall portfolio demonstrates performance across multiple distinct geographic locations. Additionally, vendors must confirm that at least one submitted QC meets the $1 million financial scale requirement. The matrix limits submissions to a maximum of three QCs and requires vendors to self-certify their compliance through yes/no/NA responses, supported by contractual document references, work sample identifiers, and clarifying notes. This tool is part of the broader GEN VI IDIQ multiple-award contract suite for Human Resource Solutions being managed by Army Contracting Command - Rock Island, with the matrix serving as a mechanism for vendors to assess their technical qualifications prior to formal proposal submission.
View the file
Other files
Show all 37
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sheet1
| PWS/Section L/Section M Reference | Evaluation Area | Section M Requirement | Self Scoring Question | Yes/ No/ NA | Work sample Identifier | Contractual Document Reference | Location Proof (Document(s) and Page(s)) | Clarifying Notes |
| Section L.2.1.4.1 | Overall QC | Each submitted contract must meet the QC definition in L.2.1.4.1. | Does each referenced contract qualify as a "QC"? | |||||
| PWS 2.2.1.3 | QC: Training & Dev. | M.3.1.1.1: Minimum of one (1) QC demonstrating experience in "Training and Development" (PWS 2.2.1.3) | Have we provided at least one QC for Training and Development? | |||||
| PWS 2.2.1.6 | QC Sustainment | M.3.1.1.1: Minimum of one (1) QC demonstrating experience in "Sustainment" (PWS 2.2.1.6). | Have we provided at least one QC for Sustainment? | |||||
| PWS 2.2.1.6.1 | Sustainment Subtasks | M.3.1.1.1: The Sustainment QC must demonstrate experience in Well-Being, Counseling, and Family Community Programs. | Does our Sustainment QC cover all three required subtasks? | |||||
| PWS Section 2.2 | Additional QCs | M.3.1.1.1: Identify the minimum required elective PLS Task Categories in accordance with Section L.2.1.4.1 | Have we selected and identified two additional task categories? | |||||
| PWS Section 2.2 | additional QC #1 | M.3.1.1.1: Provided a minimum of one (1) QC for the first additional Task Category selected. | Have we provided at least one QC for the first additional category? | |||||
| PWS Section 2.2 | Additional QC #2 | M.3.1.1.1: Provided a minimum of one (1) QC for the second additional Task Category selected. | Have we provided at least one QC for the second additional category? | |||||
| Section L.2.1.4.1.3 | All QCs: Project Summary | M.3.1.1.1: Summary of Project: Each QC adequately discusses L.2.1.4.1.3 criteria a) – e) and identifies the customer. | Does each QC's summary cover criteria a-e and name the customer? | |||||
| Section L.2.1.5 | All QCs: Relevancy | M.3.1.1.1: Technical Relevancy Narrative: Each QC demonstrates an adequate understanding of the technical requirements and skills. | Have we provided the required NAICS code, or completed the 1 to 1 task mapping in the notes column for any non 541612 contract? | |||||
| Section L.2.1.4.1.3 | Portfolio: Locations | M.3.1.1.1: Portfolio must demonstrate performance across multiple distinct locations in accordance with Section L. | Does our submitted portfolio meet the multi location requirement? | |||||
| Section L.2.1.4.1.3 | Portfolio: Financial | M.3.1.1.1: Portfolio must meet the financial scale requirement in accordance with Section L. | Does at least one of our submitted QC's meet the $1M Financial scale requirement? |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .