Attachment_0004_GEN VI PLS Self Scoring Matrix.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 20 KB Posted

Attached to
DRAFT RFPs – Human Resource Solutions, GEN VI IDIQ Contracts
Solicitation number
W519TC-26-R-AHRS
Issued by

About this file

This is a self-scoring matrix template designed for vendors to evaluate their own compliance with the technical requirements for the GEN VI Personnel Lifecycle Support (PLS) IDIQ contract. The matrix guides vendors through a structured assessment of their qualified contracts (QCs) against specific evaluation criteria outlined in Section L and Section M of the draft RFP.

The matrix requires vendors to demonstrate minimum qualifications across four mandatory task categories: Overall QC quality, Training and Development, Sustainment (including Well-Being, Counseling, and Family Community Programs), and two additional elective task categories from the PLS portfolio. For each QC submission, vendors must verify that project summaries adequately address criteria a-e and identify the customer, provide technical relevancy narratives with appropriate NAICS codes or task mapping documentation, and ensure the overall portfolio demonstrates performance across multiple distinct geographic locations. Additionally, vendors must confirm that at least one submitted QC meets the $1 million financial scale requirement. The matrix limits submissions to a maximum of three QCs and requires vendors to self-certify their compliance through yes/no/NA responses, supported by contractual document references, work sample identifiers, and clarifying notes. This tool is part of the broader GEN VI IDIQ multiple-award contract suite for Human Resource Solutions being managed by Army Contracting Command - Rock Island, with the matrix serving as a mechanism for vendors to assess their technical qualifications prior to formal proposal submission.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Attachment 0001 GEN VI RMAS Performance Work Statement (PWS).pdf PDF
Attachment_0004_GEN VI HRS RMAS_Self-Scoring_Matrix.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_0008_Past_Performance_Questionnaire_RMAS.docx DOCX document
Draft Solicitation - W519TC26RA076 RMAS.pdf PDF
RMAS_EXHIBIT_E_CDRL_D002_KEY_PERSONNEL_LISTING.pdf PDF
Attachment_0007_HRS GEN VI _RMAS_ DD254_2025 Continuation Sheet.pdf PDF
Attachment_0003_GEN VI RMAS Evaluation Criteria.pdf PDF
Attachment_0002_HRS GEN VI RMAS Instructions to Offerors.pdf PDF
EXHIBIT_A_CDRL A001_CONFERENCE MINUTES.pdf PDF
EXHIBIT_F_CDRL D003_Transition Management Plan.pdf PDF
Attachment_0008_Past_Performance_Questionnaire_PLS.docx DOCX document
Attachment_0006_HRS GEN VI _PLS_ DD254_2025.pdf PDF
Attachment_0009_Questions_PLS.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_0008_Past_Performance_Questionnaire_RMAS.docx DOCX document
Attachment 0001 GEN VI RMAS Performance Work Statement (PWS).pdf PDF
Attachment_0005_RMAS_Labor_Category_Descriptions.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
EXHIBIT_E_CDRL D002_KEY PERSONNEL LISTING.pdf PDF
Attachment_0007_HRS GEN VI _PLS_ DD254_2025_Continuation_Sheet.docx DOCX document
RMAS_EXHIBIT_D_CDRL_D001_Status_Report.pdf PDF
RMAS_EXHIBIT_B_CDRL_B001_OPSEC_SOP.pdf PDF
EXHIBIT_B_CDRL B001_OPSEC SOP.pdf PDF
EXHIBIT_D_CDRL D001_Status Report.pdf PDF
Attachment_0001_GEN VI PLS Performance Work Statement (PWS).pdf PDF
Attachment_0003_Gen VI PLS Evaluation Criteria.pdf PDF
Attachment_0005_PLS_Labor_Category_Descriptions.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
RMAS_EXHIBIT_C_CDRL_C001_Quality_Control_Plan.pdf PDF
RMAS_EXHIBIT_G_CDRL E001_CCIR.pdf PDF
RMAS_EXHIBIT_A_CDRL_A001_CONFERENCE_MINUTES.pdf PDF
RMAS_EXHIBIT_F_CDRL_D003_Transition_Management_Plan.pdf PDF
Attachment_0006_HRS_GEN_VI_RMAS_DD254_2026.pdf PDF
Attachment_0004_GEN VI HRS RMAS_Self-Scoring_Matrix.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment_0009_Questions_RMAS.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
DRAFT Solicitation - W519TC26RA075 PLS.pdf PDF
EXHIBIT_C_CDRL C001_Quality Control Plan.pdf PDF
EXHIBIT_G_CDRL E001_CCIR.pdf PDF
Attachment_0002_Gen VI PLS Instructions to Offerors.pdf PDF
Attachment_0004_GEN VI PLS Self Scoring Matrix.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Show all 37

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Sheet1

PWS/Section L/Section M ReferenceEvaluation AreaSection M RequirementSelf Scoring QuestionYes/ No/ NAWork sample IdentifierContractual Document ReferenceLocation Proof (Document(s) and Page(s))Clarifying Notes
Section L.2.1.4.1Overall QCEach submitted contract must meet the QC definition in L.2.1.4.1.Does each referenced contract qualify as a "QC"?
PWS 2.2.1.3QC: Training & Dev.M.3.1.1.1: Minimum of one (1) QC demonstrating experience in "Training and Development" (PWS 2.2.1.3)Have we provided at least one QC for Training and Development?
PWS 2.2.1.6QC SustainmentM.3.1.1.1: Minimum of one (1) QC demonstrating experience in "Sustainment" (PWS 2.2.1.6).Have we provided at least one QC for Sustainment?
PWS 2.2.1.6.1Sustainment SubtasksM.3.1.1.1: The Sustainment QC must demonstrate experience in Well-Being, Counseling, and Family Community Programs.Does our Sustainment QC cover all three required subtasks?
PWS Section 2.2Additional QCsM.3.1.1.1: Identify the minimum required elective PLS Task Categories in accordance with Section L.2.1.4.1Have we selected and identified two additional task categories?
PWS Section 2.2additional QC #1M.3.1.1.1: Provided a minimum of one (1) QC for the first additional Task Category selected.Have we provided at least one QC for the first additional category?
PWS Section 2.2Additional QC #2M.3.1.1.1: Provided a minimum of one (1) QC for the second additional Task Category selected.Have we provided at least one QC for the second additional category?
Section L.2.1.4.1.3All QCs: Project SummaryM.3.1.1.1: Summary of Project: Each QC adequately discusses L.2.1.4.1.3 criteria a) – e) and identifies the customer.Does each QC's summary cover criteria a-e and name the customer?
Section L.2.1.5All QCs: RelevancyM.3.1.1.1: Technical Relevancy Narrative: Each QC demonstrates an adequate understanding of the technical requirements and skills.Have we provided the required NAICS code, or completed the 1 to 1 task mapping in the notes column for any non 541612 contract?
Section L.2.1.4.1.3Portfolio: LocationsM.3.1.1.1: Portfolio must demonstrate performance across multiple distinct locations in accordance with Section L.Does our submitted portfolio meet the multi location requirement?
Section L.2.1.4.1.3Portfolio: FinancialM.3.1.1.1: Portfolio must meet the financial scale requirement in accordance with Section L.Does at least one of our submitted QC's meet the $1M Financial scale requirement?

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .