(USS NITZE) Attachment S-2 Past Performance Questionnaire - 24Jan22.docx

DOCX document 27 KB Posted

Attached to
USS NITZE (DDG 94) FY23 DEPOT MODERNIZATION PERIOD (DMP) A0010
Solicitation number
N00024-22-R-4412
Issued by

About this file

This document contains a solicitation and past performance questionnaire for the USS NITZE (DDG 94) FY23 DEPOT MODERNIZATION PERIOD contract opportunity. The Naval Sea Systems Command is soliciting proposals through January 2023 for maintenance, modernization, and repair services required for the USS NITZE from July 2023 through April 2025. Interested parties must register in the System for Award Management and monitor the Federal Business Opportunities website for solicitation N00024-22-R-4412 and any amendments. The solicitation includes a pricing workbook and execution milestones attachments restricted to requesters. A single award is anticipated. The past performance questionnaire instructions require evaluators to rate offerors' performance on previous contracts and provide comments on cost, schedule, technical, and subcontracting performance.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
N0002422R4412 A0007.pdf PDF
QA_5.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
N0002422R4412 A0007 conformed.pdf PDF
N0002422R4412 A0006.pdf PDF
N0002422R4412 A0006 conformed.pdf PDF
QA_4.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
N0002422R4412 A0005.pdf PDF
N0002422R4412 A0005 conformed.pdf PDF
QA_3.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
N0002422R4412 A0004.pdf PDF
N0002422R4412 A0004 conformed.pdf PDF
N00024-22-R-4412 A0003 conformed.pdf PDF
N00024-22-R-4412 A0003.pdf PDF
(USS NITZE) QA 2.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
N00024-22-R-4412 A0002.pdf PDF
N00024-22-R-4412 A0002 conformed.pdf PDF
(USS NITZE) QA 1.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
N00024-22-R-4412 A0001.pdf PDF
N00024-22-R-4412 A0001 conformed.docx DOCX document
(USS NITZE) CDRL Exhibit B - 26Jan22.pdf PDF
(USS NITZE) Attachment J-10 20 Open and Inspect Milestone Reports Due - 21Mar22.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
(USS NITZE) CDRL Exhibit C - 26Jan22.pdf PDF
N00024-22-R-4412.pdf PDF
(USS NITZE) Attachment S-9 Past Performance Questionnaire - 8Dec21.docx DOCX document
(USS NITZE) Attachment S-3 Pre-Proposal Information (PPI) Form - 21Jan22.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
(USS NITZE) Attachment S-7 Proposal Assessment - 7Mar22.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
(USS NITZE) Attachment J-8 Government Furnished Material (GFM) List - 28Jun22.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
(USS NITZE) Attachment J-7 IPTD Events and SMR - 8Dec21.docx DOCX document
(USS NITZE) Attachment J-5 Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan - 24Jan22.docx DOCX document
(USS NITZE) CDRL Exhibit A - 26Jan22.pdf PDF
Show all 30

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

USS NITZE (DDG 94) FY23 DMP

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

Instructions to Offeror

Completed questionnaires shall be forwarded directly to the Naval Sea Systems Command point of contact listed in this letter.

NOTE: ONCE COMPLETED BY THE POC, QUESTIONNAIRES MUST BE DIRECTLY TRANSMITTED TO THE GOVERNMENT AS DESCRIBED ON THE FOLLOWING PAGE. COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRES RECEIVED FROM OFFERORS ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE.

Instructions to Evaluator

The Naval Sea Systems Command is requesting an evaluation of an Offeror’s past performance for source selection purposes. Accordingly, request your candid assessment of the Offeror’s past performance; please see Section A below for the identity of the Offeror and contract of interest.

Once completed, this questionnaire and any appended information becomes Source Selection Sensitive and must be protected from disclosure. Access to this information shall be limited to Government procurement officials.

Hand-written evaluations are acceptable. Please answer each question in SECTION B by circling one of the ratings: E V S M U N/A, where:

EExceptional; VVery Good; S-Satisfactory;

MMarginal; UUnsatisfactory; N/ANot Applicable

Exceptional - Contractor performance substantially exceeded expected levels of performance.

Very Good - Contractor performance exceeded expected levels.

Satisfactory – Performance met expected levels.

Marginal - Performance was less than expected.

Unsatisfactory - Performance was significantly less than expected.

In addition, please provide supporting comments for each rating. Please use your supporting comments to highlight the Offeror’s specific strengths and weaknesses. You may use additional sheets if required. Your ratings and comments should reflect only “contractor liable” performance. You may supplement your knowledge with the knowledge and judgment of others in your organization.

Please enter the requested information in SECTION C for the person primarily responsible for completing the questionnaire, then transmit the completed questionnaire to the point of contact identified above. Thank you for your assistance in this matter.

PLEASE DO NOT PROVIDE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRES TO THE OFFEROR

SECTION A (To Be Completed by the Offeror)

1. Name of Offeror/Contractor: __________________________________________________

Address of Offeror/Contractor: ________________________________________________

2A. Contract Number (between Prime and Sub):_______________________________________

Task or Order No., where applicable: ___________________________________________

2B. Contract Number (between Government and Prime):________________________________

Task or Order No., where applicable: ___________________________________________

3A. Period of Performance: ______________________________________________________

3B. Place of Performance: _______________________________________________________

4. Description of Work/Scope of Effort (max. 50 words): _____________________________

5.POCName:
Address:
Tel. No.:
Voice:
Facsimile:

6. Method and Date Questionnaire Sent to POC:

Date: ____________________
Method: _______________________________

SECTION B (To Be Completed by Evaluator)

E Exceptional; V-Very Good; S-Satisfactory;

M Marginal; U Unsatisfactory; N/A Not Applicable

1. Overall Contract Outcome: E V S M U N/A Ability to satisfactorily complete all tasks while conforming to customer requirements, standards of good workmanship and safe practices.

Comments: _____________________________________________________________________

2. Cost Performance: E V S M U N/A Ability to accurately forecast and control costs throughout all phases of the contract.

Comments: _____________________________________________________________________

3. Schedule Performance: E V S M U N/A Ability to develop accurate work schedules and adhere to those schedules, as well as the ability to adapt to changes in requirements and work schedules.

Comments: _____________________________________________________________________

4. Technical Performance (Quality of Product): E V S M U N/A Ability to overcome technical challenges by applying sound engineering principles, complete required engineering analyses and develop adequate technical reports and plans.

Comments: _____________________________________________________________________

4. Subcontracting Plan Adherence and Coordination: E V S M U N/A If a subcontracting plan was required please describe the offerors success in meeting planned goals and/or efforts made to overcome goal deficiencies and challenges as well as the offeror’s ability to successfully manage and integrate subcontractors.

Comments: _____________________________________________________________________

SECTION C (To Be Completed by Evaluator)

1. Name of Evaluator: _____________________________________________________________

2. Position Title: _________________________________________________________

3. Administrating Authority/Agency: _________________________________________________

4. Telephone Number:Voice __________________
Facsimile _______________

5. Signature: ______________________________Date: ____________

Attachment S-2

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .