RFP 81DMV-S3937 LIST OF EVALUATORS AND CRITERIA.doc
DOC document 41 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Independent Verification and Validation (IV&V) Services for DMV Transformation Effort (DTE)
- Solicitation number
- 81DMV-S3937
- Issued by
- Nevada
About this file
This document is a List of Evaluators and Criteria for RFP 81DMV-S3937, issued by the Nevada Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) for Independent Verification and Validation (IV&V) services supporting the DMV Digital Transformation Effort (DTE). The RFP seeks IV&V services to assess the vendor's understanding of Nevada DMV modernization objectives, evaluate technical and program risks associated with large-scale enterprise modernization, and validate the organization's capability to execute comprehensive independent assessment services. The evaluation committee comprises seven DMV personnel representing multiple divisions and administrative levels, along with a representative from Nevada DOT, with Brandy Cox designated as the Financial Stability Reviewer and Michele Lynn and Jamie Weist serving as Agency Contacts.
The evaluation process employs a weighted criteria methodology with two distinct scoring phases. The written proposal evaluation utilizes four criteria totaling 100 points: demonstrated understanding of the DMV DTE and IV&V engagement purpose (30 percent weight), proposed assessment methodology and ability to evaluate the IV&V Requirements Baseline REQ-01 through REQ-65 (35 percent weight), organizational experience with IV&V and comparable services (20 percent weight), and key personnel qualifications and availability (15 percent weight). The presentation evaluation similarly employs four criteria with 100 points: demonstrated understanding of DMV modernization risks and operational readiness (35 percent weight), ability to communicate independent findings and provide executive reporting (30 percent weight), demonstrated IV&V methodology and governance assessment practices (20 percent weight), and key personnel qualifications and communication effectiveness (15 percent weight).
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 81DMV-S3937 - SOW - IV-V.docx | DOCX document | |
| 81DMV-S3937 - Cost Schedule.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| 81DMV-S3937 - Attachment_B C_Vendor_Response_Workbook.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Standard Form Contract - DMV Language~1.docx | DOCX document | |
| 81DMV-S3937 - Insurance Schedule - RFP.docx | DOCX document | |
| 81DMV-S3937-Reference-Questionnaire.docx | DOCX document | |
| 81DMV-S3937-Request-for-Proposals.docx | DOCX document | |
| 81DMV-S3937-Vendor-Information-Response.pdf | ||
| Certification-regarding-lobbying~2.pdf | ||
| Quote Instructions.pdf | ||
| Terms-and-conditions-for-services~2.pdf |
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
TECH ASSIGNED: ________________ Date added to mail list: _______________
Date sent evaluator e-mail: _______________
Date accept/decline memo due back: _______________
RFP #81DMV-S3937 LIST OF EVALUATORS
IV&V FOR DMV TRANFORMATION EFFORT
Evaluation Committee
Molly Lennon, Division Administrator – DMV (Supervisor: Tonya Laney) MJLennon@dmv.nv.gov Bethany Musselman, ASD Management Analyst IV – DMV (Supervisor: Angela Smith) bmusselman@dmv.nv.gov Suzie Pollard, MVIT Administrator - DMV (Supervisor: Tonya Laney)
SPollard@dmv.nv.gov Tim Simonetti, MVIT Deputy Administrator – DMV (Supervisor: Suzie Pollard)
CSimonetti@dmv.nv.gov Arun Kumaran, MVIT Ops – DMV (Supervisor: Tim Simonetti) akumaran@dmv.nv.gov Zachary Cord, DMV Srv. Mgt. III - DMV (Supervisor: Molly Lennon)
ZCord@dmv.nv.gov Josh Parker, Master ITP II – DMV (Supervisor: Angela Smith) JWParker@dmv.nv.gov Jeramie Brown, Chief - Nevada DOT
JBrown@dot.nv.gov Financial Stability Reviewer:
Brandy Cox, ASO III – bcox@dmv.nv.gov Agency Contact:
Michele Lynn Jamie Weist Criteria and Weights:
| Criteria |
| Weight |
Demonstrated understanding of the Nevada DMV Digital Transformation Effort (DTE), modernization objectives described in this solicitation, the purpose of the IV&V engagement, and the vendor’s approach to identifying and assessing technical and program risks associated with a large-scale enterprise modernization initiative.
Proposed assessment methodology, independent review approach, ability to perform the full scope of IV&V assessment services identified within the Scope of Work, and ability to evaluate the Nevada DMV IV&V Requirements Baseline (REQ-01 through REQ-65) and provide evidence-based findings, observations, risks, and recommendations.
Organizational experience performing Independent Verification and Validation (IV&V), program assurance, technical oversight, or comparable independent assessment services relevant to enterprise modernization and digital transformation initiatives.
Qualifications, experience, availability, and demonstrated capability of proposed key personnel assigned to the engagement.
Presentation Criteria and Weights:
| Criteria |
| Weight |
Demonstrated understanding of DMV modernization risks, governance considerations, technical challenges, quality assurance obligations, and operational readiness requirements.
Ability to communicate independent findings, recommendations, executive reporting, risk-based decision support, and program-level observations.
| Demonstrated IV&V methodology, assessment approach, governance assessment, quality assurance, and assurance practices. |
| 20 |
Qualifications, expertise, communication effectiveness, and overall suitability of proposed personnel participating in the presentation.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .