PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE for 36C78622R0020 Georgia NC Expansion Ph 2 Construction 922CM3006 (8-8-2022).docx
DOCX document 17 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Y1FE--36C78622R0020 | Georgia NC; Expansion Ph 2 Construction 922CM3006 (VA-21-00103342)
- Solicitation number
- 36C78622R0020
About this file
This performance questionnaire is intended to collect feedback from a government evaluator regarding a contractor's past performance on a federal contract. The questionnaire requests information about the contractor including its name and address, the relevant contract number and award/completion dates, contract value, project title and description. It also includes questions rating the contractor's quality of products and services, performance, schedule adherence, technical requirements fulfillment, cost control, customer satisfaction, and an overall assessment. Space is provided for comments explaining any exceptional, good, marginal or unacceptable ratings.
The related federal contract opportunity is a solicitation issued by the Department of Veterans Affairs National Cemetery Administration to construct expansion phases at the Georgia National Cemetery. The project scope includes constructing over 6,600 pre-placed crypts in double-depth plots, over 350 oversized crypts, nearly 300 traditional gravesites, around 6,900 in-ground cremation sites, and approximately 7,300 columbarium niches, along with associated site and infrastructure work. The performance period and response deadline are not specified.
View the file
Other files
Show all 42
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
Your assistance is requested in support of a source selection.
Please complete this Questionnaire and return it via email to: Kellyann Bruno (Kellyann.bruno@va.gov)
Desired Response Date: _________________
When complete, the information on this form is SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION (41 U.S.C. 423) and shall be protected accordingly.
TO BE COMPLETED BY OFFEROR
| 1a. CONTRACTOR NAME & ADDRESS: |
| 2. CONTRACT NO.: |
3. CONTRACT AWARD DATE:
4. COMPLETION DATE:
5. CONTRACT VALUE (with options): $
1b. NAME OF PRIME CONTRACTOR (If this questionnaire is for a team member)
6. TYPE OF CONTRACT:
7. PROJECT TITLE, LOCATION, AND DESCRIPTION (AND TOTAL CONSTRUCTION VALUE AT PROJECT COMPLETION):
Please add a continuation page if additional space necessary.
TO BE COMPLETED BY EVALUATING ORGANIZATION REPRESENTATIVE
8. EVALUATION: a. EVALUATOR'S NAME, POSITION (Project Manager/ COR/ Other) AND ORGANIZATION:
b. EVALUATOR'S PHONE NUMBER: c. MONTHS PERFORMANCE MONITORED BY EVALUATOR:
Please circle the response code for each topic (A – G) that best reflects your experience with this contractor.
| E = Exceptional |
| S = Satisfactory |
| U = Unacceptable |
| G = Very Good |
| M = Marginal |
| N/O = Not Observed |
A. Quality of Products and Services - Assess the contractor’s conformance to contract requirements, specifications, and standards of good workmanship (e.g., technical, professional, environmental, or safety and health standards).
E G S M U N/O
B. Performance – Assess the contractor’s performance as the General Contractor or Architect/Engineer (as appropriate) for the project.
E G S M U N/O
C. Schedule – Assess the timeliness of contractor against the schedule of activities.
E G S M U N/O
D. Technical Requirements – Assess the contractor’s ability to fulfill the technical requirements of the contract.
E G S M U N/O
E. Cost Control – Assess the contractor’s ability to manage the contract budget and control costs.
E G S M U N/O
F. Customer Satisfaction – Assess the contractor’s responsiveness to customer concerns and “user friendliness”.
E G S M U N/O
G. Overall Assessment.
E G S M U N/O
Comments (for any ratings of E, G, M, or U, please provide some brief comments about strengths & weaknesses you observed in this contractor that help us understand your rating. Feel free to provide additional pages if necessary):
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .