Maintenance Operation and Modernization Pre Proposal Conference.pptx

PPTX presentation 381 KB Posted

Attached to
Maintenance, Operation, and Modernization Support of U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Application Systems and Environment
Solicitation number
NRC-HQ-11-R-33-011
Issued by

About this file

MOM Pre-proposal Conference Slides

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
NRC-HQ-11-R-33-0011 A0017.pdf PDF
NRC-HQ-11-R-33-0011 A0016.pdf PDF
NRC-HQ-11-R-33-0011 A0015.pdf PDF
NRC-HQ-11-R-33-0011 A0014.pdf PDF
NRC-HQ-11-R-33-0011 A0013.pdf PDF
NRC-HQ-11-R-33-0011 A0012.pdf PDF
NRC-HQ-11-R-33-0011 A0011.pdf PDF
NRC-HQ-11-R-33-0011 A0010.pdf PDF
NRC-HQ-11-R-33-0011 A009.pdf PDF
NRC-HQ-11-R-33-0011 A008.pdf PDF
NRC-HQ-11-R-33-0011--A007.pdf PDF
NRC-HQ-11-R-33-0011 A006.pdf PDF
NRC-HQ-11-R-33-0011 A005.pdf PDF
NRC-HQ-11-R-33-0011 A004.pdf PDF
NRC-HQ-11-R-33-011 A003.pdf PDF
NRC-HQ-11-R-33-0011 A002 —
NRC-HQ-11-R-33-0011 A001 —
Addendum HH Past Performance Questionnaire.doc DOC document
Addendum II - NRC Form 829 Small Business Contracting Plan.pdf PDF
Addendum DD NRC 187.pdf PDF
Addendum EE COI Guidelines.doc DOC document
Addendum FF —
Appendix A - G.docx DOCX document
NRC-HQ-11-R-33-0011.(2.25.2011).doc DOC document
Addendum GG Award Term Plan.doc DOC document
Addendum CC FP Billing Instructions .doc DOC document
Addendum AA List of K .doc DOC document
Addendum BB LH Instruction.doc DOC document
Show all 28

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Maintenance, Operation, and Modernization

Pre-Proposal Conference

March 3, 2011

Skip Kemerer

SLIDE ‹#›

Contract History Original Maintenance and Operations contract began in 1996 Computer Sciences Corporation 1996-2001 OAO Corporation 2001-2006 LMIT 2006 to present

This function has been highly outsourced since the mid 90’s

Began with no formal SDLC to using RUP with a CMM level 3 process

Objectives Ensure the continued operation of NRC application systems by providing maintenance, operation and modernization (MOM) support activities to current and future NRC automated computer systems

Provide systems modernization support services while replacing legacy technologies with secure, innovative, enterprise-wide IT solutions

Modernization will provide an opportunity to simplify maintenance and operations (M&O) work with the intent of decreasing future M&O costs

Contract Information Performance Based Identified in Section C evaluated monthly

Indefinite-Delivery, Indefinite-Quantity (IDIQ) contract with firm-fixed-price, time-and-materials or labor-hour task orders

1 year base with nine (9) one-year options to extend the term of the contract. The last three options are award term options

Contract Information Cont.

Full and Open Competition Functional Areas:

Functional Area (FA) 1: Centralized Environment Support (one award) FA 2: M&O of Legacy Systems (multiple awards possible) FA 3: Requirements and Design (multiple awards possible)

Small Business Set-Aside Functional Areas:

FA 4: Modernization of Legacy Systems (multiple awards possible) FA 5: M&O of Modernized Systems (multiple awards possible)

100 Active Systems 24 Languages 37 COTS Applications 5 OS Platforms Data Bases

Reduced Staff Fewer Systems Handful of Technologies Fewer Applications NRC Mission Objectives Today’s Environment Mom’s Apple Pie Application Modernization Challenges Development of Modernization Strategy Development of Cost Model Process re-engineering and cultural buy-in

80 Staff Application Portfolio

Segment Architecture

Functional Areas (FA) FA 1: Centralized Environment

FA 2: M&O of Legacy Systems

FA 3: Requirements and Design

FA 4: Modernization of Legacy Systems

FA 5: M&O of Modernized Systems

Communications

Example Cost Graph

Percentage Year

Success/Failure Success:

Innovative cost model Technical strategies for modernization of systems and personnel

Failure:

Providing the same standard cost model and technical approach

Schedule

EventDate
RFP IssuedFebruary 25, 2011
Pre-Proposal ConferenceMarch 3, 2011
Functional AreaProposals DueAnticipated Award

(days after proposal due date)

FA1March 31, 201190 days
FA2April 29, 201190 days
FA3August 4, 2011120 days
FA4September 23, 2011120 days
FA5September 23, 2011120 days

Constraints Management Directive (MD) 2.8 Project Management Methodology (PMM) and

MD 12.5 NRC Automated Information Security Program

Additionally, the Contractor is required to:

Provide a clear definition of service objectives and performance criteria Define system operational performance requirements Align and map services to technology Update system and IT security documentation and all other documentation associated with the application systems with each release Provide the ability to model the effect of changes in technology to changes in business requirements Comply with Federal regulations and NRC policy

Constraints Cont.

Significant work will be IV&V’d by independent contractor

Considering withholding a % of the contract until contract closeout to ensure documentation compliance

Questions/Comments Please submit questions and comments to Pearlette Merriweather at MOMContract@nrc.gov

FA1 questions/comments are due no later than March 11, 2011 at 3:30PM EST

FA2, FA3, FA4, FA5 questions/comments are due the later of 3 weeks prior to proposal submission date or 3 work days after any amendment to the solicitation

Questions about both the MOM contract and the DRAFT MOM Performance Work Statement.

image1.jpeg image2.png image3.jpeg image4.png image5.emf

Microsoft_Office_Excel_97-2003_Worksheet1.xls Chart1

99 1 100

98 2 100

95 5 100

92 8 100

87 13 100

81 19 100

74 26 100

65 35 100

56 44 100

48 52 100

39 61 100

33 67 100

25 75 100

20 79.5 80

Maintenance Costs

Modernization Costs

Exsiting Contract Cost

Sheet1

Year Modernization Costs Maintenance Costs Exsiting Contract Cost New Maintenance Cost

1 99 1 100 100

1.5 98 2 100 100

2 95 5 100 100

2.5 92 8 100 100

3 87 13 100 100

3.5 81 19 100 100

4 74 26 100 100

4.5 65 35 100 100

5 56 44 100 100

5.5 48 52 100 100

6 39 61 100 100

6.5 33 67 100 100

7 25 75 100 100

7.5 20 79.5 80 99.5

8 80 0

8.5 80 0

9 80 0

9.5 80 0

10 80 0

10.5 80 0

Sheet1

0 0 0

0 0 0

0 0 0

0 0 0

0 0 0

0 0 0

0 0 0

0 0 0

0 0 0

0 0 0

0 0 0

0 0 0

0 0 0

0 0 0

0 0 0

0 0 0

0 0 0

0 0 0

0 0 0

0 0 0

Exsiting Contract Cost

Sheet2

Sheet3

Sheet1 (2)

Year Old Updated Cost

1 99 1 100 100

1.5 98 2 100 100

2 95 5 100 100

2.5 92 8 100 100

3 87 13 100 100

3.5 81 19 100 100

4 74 26 100 100

4.5 65 35 100 100

5 56 44 100 100

5.5 48 52 100 100

6 38 63 100 101

6.5 28 73 100 101

7 17.5 80 80 97.5

7.5 1 99 80 100

8 1 99 80 100

8.5 1 99 80 100

9 1 99 80 100

9.5 1 99 80 100

10 1 99 80 100

10.5 1 99 80 100

Sheet1 (2)

99 1 100

98 2 100

95 5 100

92 8 100

87 13 100

81 19 100

74 26 100

65 35 100

56 44 100

48 52 100

38 63 100

28 73 100

17.5 80 80

1 99 80

1 99 80

1 99 80

1 99 80

1 99 80

1 99 80

1 99 80

Old

Updated

Cost image6.png image7.png image8.png image9.png

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .