Questions_and_Answers.pdf

PDF 162 KB Posted

Attached to
OMNIBUS MULTIDISCIPLINE ENGINEERING SERVICES II
Solicitation number
NNG16549116R
Issued by

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Final_Amendment__2.pdf PDF
RFP_Amendment.pdf PDF
Final_Questions_and_Answers__2.pdf PDF
Enclosure_AA _Government_QA_Plan.pdf PDF
ENCLOSURE_DD_-_Incumbent_Direct_Labor_Rates.pdf PDF
RFP_Cover_letter.pdf PDF
Attachment_N _Quality_Assurance_Plan.pdf PDF
Attachment_B _IDIQ_Cost-Type_Rate_Matrix--All_IDIQ_Contract.pdf PDF
Exhibit_13 _Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf PDF
Attachment_C _533_Attach_All_IDIQ--Both_Onsite_and_Offsite.pdf PDF
Attachment_K _IT_Security_Applicable_Documents_List.pdf PDF
Enclosure_CC _FINAL_GPM-Specified_Non-Mgmt_DL_Categories_DL_Hours_and_PDs_Enclosure.pdf PDF
Attachment_H _Small_Business_Subcontracting_Plan.pdf PDF
Copy_of_Final_Review_Exh_GPM_Exhibits_1A-1C_All_IDIQ_with_GPM-Specified_ODCs_by_CY-1_(2).pdf PDF
Attachment_F _PIV_Attachment.pdf PDF
Attachment_D _List_of_IAGP.pdf PDF
Attachment_J _OCI_Avoidance_Plan.pdf PDF
SF_33.pdf PDF
Enclosure_BB_2--SSCO_RTO_finalRFP.pdf PDF
Attachment_L _IT_Security_Management_Plan.pdf PDF
Attachment_A _Final_Draft_OMES-II_SOW.pdf PDF
Attachment_G _Safety_and_Health_Plan.pdf PDF
Encosure_BB__1--JPSS_RTO_finalRFP.pdf PDF
Attachment_E _List_of_GFP.pdf PDF
Attachment_I _Contract_Historical_Data.pdf PDF
ENCLOSURE_DD_-_Incumbent_Direct_Labor_Rates.pdf PDF
Attachment_M _DD_254.pdf PDF
Attachment_F _PIV_Attachment.pdf PDF
Attachment_B _IDIQ_Cost-Type_Rate_Matrix--All_IDIQ_Contract.pdf PDF
Signed_RFP_letter.pdf PDF
Enclosure_BB--_2_JPSS_RTO.pdf PDF
Exhibit_13 _Past_Performance_Questionnaire.pdf PDF
Attachment_D _List_of_IAGP.pdf PDF
Attachment_L _IT_Security_Management_Plan.pdf PDF
Attachment_I _Contract_Historical_Data.pdf PDF
Attachment_J _OCI_Avoidance_Plan.pdf PDF
Attachment_G _Safety_and_Health_Plan.pdf PDF
Final_Review_of_Exh_GPM_Exhibits_2-12_All_IDIQ_by_CY-1.pdf PDF
Attachment_K _IT_Security_Applicable_Documents_List.pdf PDF
Enclosure_BB--_1_SSCO_RTO.pdf PDF
Attachment_C _533_Attach_All_IDIQ--Both_Onsite_and_Offsite.pdf PDF
Enclosure_CC _FINAL_GPM-Specified_Non-Mgmt_DL_Categories_DL_Hours_and_PDs_Enclosure.pdf PDF
Attachment_A _Final_Draft_OMES-II_SOW.pdf PDF
Final_Review_Exh_GPM_Exhibits_1A-1C_All_IDIQ_with_GPM-Specified_ODCs_by_CY-1.pdf PDF
Attachment_H _Small_Business_Subcontracting_Plan.pdf PDF
Attachment_E _List_of_GFP.pdf PDF
SF_33.pdf PDF
Enclosure_DD _Incumbent_Direct_Labor_Rates.pdf PDF
Enclosure_AA _Government_QA_Plan.pdf PDF
Attachment_N _Quality_Assurance_Plan.pdf PDF
Show 40 more

50 files listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Question Answer

Question 1:

L.15(a), page 128 of 141 – Please confirm that the requirement for Offeror to provide

"statement of contract safety performance and a record of your company’s OSHA recordable injuries and illnesses for the past 3 years” is outside the 25 page limitation for Volume

IV.

Question 1 Answer:

This requirement is included in the 25 page limitation.

Question 2:

L.15(a) (page 128) The last bullet asks for

“de-scope” information. We respectfully request the data required for contracts that were “de-scoped” be limited to NASA contracts or eliminated entirely. For a large company, this data call requires assessing thousands of records and represents a significant administrative burden while yielding information of limited value to the

Government since most de-scopes are a result of customer funding constraints.

Question 2 Answer:

The Offeror shall provide the requested de-scope information for the past /current contract references that meet the criteria in the

RFP for the Prime Offeror and each significant subcontractor.

Question 3:

L 13 (c) subfactor B, page 107, asks the offeror to provide four pieces of information

'if significant subcontractors are proposed.'

M.4(a)-subfactor B, paragraph 3, on page 132 is not clear if that information is required of all subcontractors or only significant subcontractors. Please clarify.

Question 3 Answer:

The Government will only evaluate any proposed significant subcontractors.

Additionally, an amendment will be issued to revise typo found on page 132. Last sentence of subcontracting paragraph is changed from

“…subcontracted portions of the subcontract…” to “…subcontracted portions of the contract…”

Question 4:

L.13 (c), Subfactor B - Offerors shall provide written position qualifications for the specific labor categories envisioned for this requirement. Per the directions in the Cost

Volume Instruction provision, the offeror’s

Position Qualifications are to be included in the contract Attachment entitled, “Direct

Labor Rates, Indirect Rates, and Fee

Matrices,” which shall be submitted in the

Cost Volume per GSFC 52.215-201 table

(b)(1). M.4(a) - The Government will evaluate the reasonableness and effectiveness of the offeror’s position qualifications for the specific labor categories envisioned for this requirement and how they address the minimum requirements in the position qualifications, to include the necessary experience, summary of duties and responsibilities, specific requirements/licensing, minimum education and minimum experience required for the position. Would GSFC consider moving the written position qualifications, required in the

Mission Suitability Volume, under Subfactor

B - outside the 100 page limit?

Question 4 Answer:

Per the RFP Section L.13, Subfactor B, “Offerors shall provide written position qualifications for the specific labor categories envisioned for this requirement. Per the directions in the Cost Volume Instruction provision, the offeror’s Position

Qualifications are to be included in the contract Attachment entitled, “Direct Labor

Rates, Indirect Rates, and Fee Matrices,” which shall be submitted in the Cost Volume per GSFC 52.215-201 table (b)(1).”

Attachment B is not part of the 100 page limitation.

Question 5:

Proposals submitted in response to this solicitation shall be due no later than July 28, 2016 at 3:00 pm ET. Be advised, in accordance with Provision L.15, Offerors need to encourage their references to submit their Past Performance Questionnaires directly to the Contracting Officer 2 weeks prior to proposal due date. Certain past performance programs are for programs performed for other Government Agencies that have specific requirements for reviewing and releasing unclassified past performance writeups, as well as specific timelines for responding to past performance questionnaires. Would GSFC consider extending the proposal response timeframe by

15 days to 45 days?

Question 5 Answer:

Although the Government encourages submission of questionnaires 2 weeks prior to the proposal due date, the actual submission date for questionnaires is no later than the closing date of this solicitation (July 28th), as stated in Provision L.15.

Question 6:

In order to establish the reasonableness and realism of the proposed costs, and the extent to which costs reflect performance addressed in the Mission Suitability Volume proposal, each Offeror, including proposed subcontractors, shall submit the other than certified cost or pricing data described in

Section (b) below. Can the Government confirm that non-significant subs are not required to submit any of the data required in

Section (b)? Items (8) through (16) do not specify if "Offeror" is Prime only, includes significant subcontractors and/or non-significant subcontractors.

Answer 6 Answer:

Non-significant subcontractors are required to submit certain specific exhibits that apply to non-significant subcontractors. Particularly, Non-Significant Subcontractors shall complete and submit Exhibit 2C and, if applicable, Exhibit 2D. Additionally, Exhibits 10A and 10B should be submitted by non-significant subs if applicable (see specific instructions for those exhibits). No other exhibits (or supporting narrative for direct or indirect rate substantiation) are required.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .