USA_Industry_Day_Master_Final.pdf

SLS USA Industry Day: August 17, 2016

National Aeronautics and Space Administration www.nasa.gov/sls

S p a c e

L a u n c h

S y s t e m

Space Launch System Universal Stage Adapter Industry Day August 17, 2016 www.nasa.gov/sls

S p a c e

L a u n s t e mSpace Launch System Universal Stage Adapter Industry Day August 17, 2016

Kickoff

Kathleen E. Schubert NASA GRC Deputy Director

Safety and Mission Assurance

Important Safety Information

Emergency Dispatch:

Dial 911 from in-house phone.

Dial 216-433-8888 from cell phone.

Medical Services: 216-433-5841

• Please return visitor badges to visitor control when you depart the Center at the end of the day.

• Please do not use any photographic or recording equipment

(Video, still frame cameras, etc.) of Industry Day presentations and/or One on One sessions.

• Emergency Egress exit doors are located to the left as you face the main stage or exit main doors.

• Restrooms are to the right as you entered the building.

• Complimentary refreshments are provided at the back of the auditorium.

• Lunch is not provided, the cafeteria is located in Building 15.

• Wifi access through nasaguest network. Need to input valid email through web browser.

Purpose of Industry Day

• Industry Day is intended to assist potential offerors and their understanding of the process and the scope of the SLS USA acquisition.

• Industry Day provides an opportunity to ask questions and provide feedback to NASA on the Draft RFP.

• In the event of a discrepancy between

Industry Day presentations and the solicitation, the SOLICITATION TAKES

PRECEDENCE.

Industry Day Agenda

9:00 – Kickoff Kathy Schubert

9:05 – Welcome from GRC Center Director Janet Kavandi

9:20 – Comments from MSFC/SLS Steve Creech

9:25 – Objectives & Guidance Jeff Hoyt

9:35 – Export Control/ITAR Dexter Johnson

9:45 – SLS USA Overview Joe Roche

10:00 – Overview of Technical Requirements Aaron Weaver

Tom Krivanek

10:15 – Launch Processing Chad Brown

10:30 – Break

10:45 – Response to Questions

11:00 – Acquisition Overview & Mission Suitability Jeff Hoyt

11:15 – Past Performance Dan Saccomando

11:20 – Cost Heather Linden

11:30 – Response to Questions & Morning Wrap Up

12:00 – 1:00 – Lunch break, Cafeteria, Building 15

Industry Day Agenda (cont.)

1:00 – 1:40 Overview of NASA Facilities

GRC- Plum Brook Richard Sorge/NASA GRC

MSFC Mike Roberts/NASA MSFC

1:40 – 1:50 Break

1:50 – 2:15 Response to Questions & Afternoon Wrap Up

2:30 – 5:00 One on One Meetings with Industry

One-on-one meetings with DRFP team

One-on-one meeting with Facilities Reps

Small Business Officer Table

Thursday, August 18th : One-on-One meetings as scheduled

GRC Map www.nasa.gov/sls

S p a c e

L a u n s t e mSpace Launch System Universal Stage Adapter Industry Day August 17, 2016

NASA GRC Center Director’s Welcome

Dr. Janet Kavandi Director of the National Aeronautics and Space

Administration’s John H. Glenn Research Center www.nasa.gov/sls

S p a c e

L a u n s t e mSpace Launch System Universal Stage Adapter Industry Day August 17, 2016

NASA MSFC

Steven Creech Deputy Manager for the Spacecraft Payload

Integration and Evolution Element within the Space Launch System Program Office at NASA MSFC

SPACE LAUNCH SYSTEM

www.nasa.gov/sls

5 . . . 4 . . . 3 . . . 2 . . . 1 . . .

A NEW CAPABILITY FOR SPACE EXPLORATION

Steve Creech Spacecraft/Payload Integration & Evolution

17 August 2016 www.nasa.gov/sls

SLS Block 2 Cargo

130t

SLS Block 1B Crew

105t SLS Block 1B Cargo

105t

SLS Block 1

70t

365 ft.

RS-25 Engines

364 ft.

Core StageCore Stage

322 ft.

Interstage

Advanced

Boosters

Solid

Rocket

Boosters

Exploration

Upper Stage

327 ft.

Orion

Launch Abort System

Launch Vehicle

Stage Adapter

Interim Cryogenic

Propulsion Stage

Exploration

Upper Stage

Cargo FairingCargo Fairing

Interstage

ISPE

Solid

Rocket

Boosters

Core Stage

Evolution of NASA’s Space Launch System

0205_SLS 101.12

www.nasa.gov/sls

Launch Abort

System

Interstage

Core Stage

RS-25

Engines (4)

Service Module

Payload Attach Fitting (PAF)

Solid

Rocket

Boosters

(2)

Exploration Upper Stage

Encapsulated Service Module Panels

Crew Module

Orion Multi-

Purpose

Crew Vehicle

Spacecraft Adapter

HAB/Cargo

RL10 Engines (4)

Universal Stage Adapter

Orion

Spacecraft

Spacecraft

Adapter

Integrated Spacecraft

Payload Element

Payload Attach

Fitting (PAF)

10m

8.4m

USA

5.5m

Co-Manifested

Payload (CPL)

Secondary

Payload (SPL)

Space Launch System: The Next Step

0205_SLS 101.14

9:00 – Kickoff Kathy Schubert

9:05 – Welcome from GRC Center Director Janet Kavandi

9:20 – Comments from MSFC/SLS Steve Creech

9:25 – Objectives & Guidance Jeff Hoyt

9:35 – Export Control/ITAR Dexter Johnson

9:45 – SLS USA Overview Joe Roche

10:00 – Overview of Technical Requirements Aaron Weaver

Tom Krivanek

10:15 – Launch Processing Chad Brown

10:30 – Break

10:45 – Response to Questions

11:00– Acquisition Overview & Mission Suitability Jeff Hoyt

11:15 – Past Performance Dan Saccomando

11:20 – Cost Heather Linden www.nasa.gov/sls

S p a c e

L a u n s t e mSpace Launch System Universal Stage Adapter Industry Day August 17, 2016

Industry Day Objectives & Guidance

Jeff Hoyt Contracting Officer

Purpose of USA Industry Day

• To give context to the procurement.

• To give insight in to requirements and Draft Request for

Proposals (DRFP).

• To introduce government facility primary points of contact and how to request facility use.

• To make our Office of Small Business Programs available for consultation.

• To gather feedback / questions.

• This is your day – make the best of it!

Questions and Answers

• All questions will be answered at the conference or in writing at a later time.

• Asking questions – 3 options:

• Ask in real-time.

• Use www.grc.cnf.io

• Submit Industry Day related questions via email by Monday, August 22.

• NASA will post to www.FBO.gov Question and Answer document for Industry Day questions.

• All questions will be anonymous, and there will be no references to company-specific information.

• Questions and comments from the one-on-ones will not be posted http://www.fbo.gov/ http://www.fbo.gov/

Using Conference I/O

Go to: www.grc.cnf.io

Tap to ask a question

Tap to vote on questions you’d like to move to the top of the list

SLS USA Industry Day - August 17, 2016

NASA Questions to Industry

• Are the due dates and page counts adequate?

• Are there any contract clauses that raise concern? If so, what are the specific concerns?

• Are any of the requirements unclear or overly constraining?

• Are there any requirements that could be tailored without compromising the performance and safety of the USA?

• Are there any suggestions for streamlining any of the Data Requirement Documents?

NASA Questions to Industry (Cont.)

• Use of Options – If NASA were to exercise multiple options, as opposed to exercising individual options before each option’s respective Exploration Mission, would there be any advantage in doing so? If so, what are the advantages?

• Options contract type – Are there any comments on the use of a cost plus award fee contract type for options 1 – 6?

***** Disclosure *****

In the event of any discrepancy between information you hear today and information in the

Final Request for Proposal

(RFP), the Final RFP is the controlling document.

9:00 – Kickoff Kathy Schubert

9:05 – Welcome from GRC Center Director Janet Kavandi

9:20 – Comments from MSFC/SLS Steve Creech

9:25 – Objectives & Guidance Jeff Hoyt

9:35 – Export Control/ITAR Dexter Johnson

9:45 – SLS USA Overview Joe Roche

10:00 – Overview of Technical Requirements Aaron Weaver

Tom Krivanek

10:15 – Launch Processing Chad Brown

10:30 – Break

10:45 – Response to Questions

11:00– Acquisition Overview & Mission Suitability Jeff Hoyt

11:15 – Past Performance Dan Saccomando

11:20 – Cost Heather Linden www.nasa.gov/sls

S p a c e

L a u n s t e mSpace Launch System Universal Stage Adapter Industry Day August 17, 2016

Export Control

Steven Fedor Dexter Johnson

Overview

• A technical data package will be made available to prospective offerors upon request and approval

• The technical data package contains some documents that are export controlled

• Documents that are export controlled are marked accordingly and cannot be further transferred to foreign entities

• The technical data package shall be requested via the Request for Technical Data Form

• See Section J.2-9 of the RFP for the Request for

Technical Data Form

Process to Request Data

• Complete the Request for Technical Data Form and e-mail it to

Steven Fedor and Kirk Seablom

• Upon receipt of the form, the prospective offeror will receive an email from NASA GRC’s Secure File Transfer (SFT) System with the following instruction:

• “Hi ___________, Steven Fedor has completed a drop-off for you. The file(s) can be picked up at: https://sft.grc.nasa.gov/pins/pickup.

When picking up your file(s), a mandatory PIN must be entered. The sender of the files is responsible for providing you with the PIN through some secure means of communication. The PIN will expire once the files are successfully picked up or in 7 days.”

• After the e-mail is received, contact Steven Fedor at

216-433-2144 to receive the PIN in order to access the file(s) https://sft.grc.nasa.gov/pins/pickup

9:00 – Kickoff Kathy Schubert

9:05 – Welcome from GRC Center Director Janet Kavandi

9:20 – Comments from MSFC/SLS Steve Creech

9:25 – Objectives & Guidance Jeff Hoyt

9:35 – Export Control/ITAR Dexter Johnson

9:45 – SLS USA Overview Joe Roche

10:00 – Overview of Technical Requirements Aaron Weaver

Tom Krivanek

10:15 – Launch Processing Chad Brown

10:30 – Break

10:45 – Response to Questions

11:00– Acquisition Overview & Mission Suitability Jeff Hoyt

11:15 – Past Performance Dan Saccomando

11:20 – Cost Heather Linden www.nasa.gov/sls

S p a c e

L a u n s t e mSpace Launch System Universal Stage Adapter Industry Day August 17, 2016

SLS Block 1B Universal Stage Adapter

Overview

Joe Roche

Agenda

.29

• SLS Evolution

• SLS Block 1B

• ISPE

• USA

• USA Development Schedule

• Current Activities

SLS Evolution Overview

.30

USA Conceptual Design

Block 1B 28000 Configuration

• External structure of Integrated

Spacecraft and Payload Element

(ISPE) Assembly

USA Functions

• Provide a transition structural element between EUS and Orion

• Encapsulate co-manifested and secondary payloads

• Provide and provide environmental control to payloads during integrated ground operations, launch, and ascent phases

• Separate to expose payloads post

Orion deployment

• Transfer any services between

PAF/EUS and Orion

Key Driving Requirements

.32

• Ensure crew safety through all mission phases within the limitations of meeting system performance requirements and achieving mission objectives

• Integrate with required elements of the SLS, MPCV, and Ground Operations systems

• Optimize total liftoff mass within the required mass targets

• Reliably separate without damaging or re-contacting the EUS, Co-Manifested Payload, or MPCV

• Be space-flight qualified through the life of the design, including the ability to reconfigure access doors and other intrusions to mission specific requirements

• Provide environmental protection, including thermal and acoustic, to the co-manifested payload

• Provide electrical and communication paths between the EUS and MPCV

USA Conceptual Design

MPCV SA to USA Interface

.34

USA to PAF Interface

.35

FY16 FY17 FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21

2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4

SPIE

August

2021 EM-2

Launch

USA

SPIE B1B

SRR/SDR

EM-2

Aug ’21

SPIE B1B &

USA PDR

Procurement

USA

RFP

Award/ATP

SPIE B1B &

USA CDR

USA @

KSC

USA Build/Qual

Flt Unit Build

Jan ‘19Jan ‘18Jul ‘16

Oct‘16

Aug ‘17

Nov ‘18

Mar ‘20

Mar ‘20

Feb ‘21

Prime Contractor Design/Build

Draft

RFP

Aug‘16

B1B PDR

Data DropJan‘18 Jan ’19

Int. Supt.

Feb ‘21 Aug ‘21

B1B CDR

Data Drop

SPIE B1B &

USA DCR

Mar ‘20

Mar ’20

B1B DCR

Data Drop Jan ’21

USA

SAR

Notional EM-2 Development Schedule

USA Development Schedule

USA Development Schedule

Notional EM-3 to EM-8 Schedule

9:00 – Kickoff Kathy Schubert

9:05 – Welcome from GRC Center Director Janet Kavandi

9:20 – Comments from MSFC/SLS Steve Creech

9:25 – Objectives & Guidance Jeff Hoyt

9:35 – Export Control/ITAR Dexter Johnson

9:45 – SLS USA Overview Joe Roche

10:00 – Overview of Technical Requirements Aaron Weaver

Tom Krivanek

10:15 – Launch Processing Chad Brown

10:30 – Break

10:45 – Response to Questions

11:00– Acquisition Overview & Mission Suitability Jeff Hoyt

11:15 – Past Performance Dan Saccomando

11:20 – Cost Heather Linden www.nasa.gov/sls

S p a c e

L a u n s t e m

Space Launch System Universal Stage Adapter Industry Day August 17, 2016

Universal Stage Adapter Technical Overview

Aaron Weaver/Tom Krivanek

SOW Requirements

• Presentation is organized in programmatic and technical sections

• Programmatic Requirements Include:

• Project Management

• Systems Engineering

• Safety and Mission Assurance

Project Management

• Approach and SOW requirements based on NPR 7120.5

• Goal is to ensure good communication and relationship between

Contractor and Government teams

• Earned Value Management (EVM) is required

• Project Management Reviews (PMRs), IPMR, and 533s all interrelated

• Design Reviews

• PDR, CDR, DCR are held at the SPIE level

Contractor documentation and participation required for those reviews

• NASA expects invitations to internal Contractor reviews

• NASA will conduct an SAR at the USA level prior to DD250

• SOW calls out technical meetings and working groups

• Risk management is a vital PM tool to facilitate proactive decision making

Systems Engineering

• Approach and SOW requirements based on NPR 7123.1

• Systems Engineering Management Plan is defined in the

Project Management Plan DRD

• Contractor shall develop a Contract End-Item (CEI)

Specification based on the USA Requirements Document

• Interface requirements shall be captured in the CEI spec

• Critical external interfaces to Orion SA, PAF/EUS, and GSDO

• SLS manages interfaces through ICDs

• Contractor qualification and acceptance testing programs are integral to the success of the USA

• Verification and test plans are required to address how the system will be qualified for human-rated flight

Safety and Mission Assurance

• The Contractor shall fully integrate Safety and Mission Assurance

(S&MA) into the USA design, development, test, ground, assembly, integration, ground processing activities, and risk identification and mitigation processes

• Implemented in accordance with SLS Program Safety and Mission

Assurance (S&MA) Requirements (SLS-RQMT-014)

• The Contractor shall identify and control hazards to both personnel and hardware

• The Contractor shall ensure reliability of the USA hardware through reliability analyses, failure modes and effects analyses, and identification of limited life items

• The Contractor shall implement a quality assurance program compliant with SLS-RQMT-014

• The Contractor shall be certified or compliant with SAE AS9100

SOW Requirements

• Technical Requirements Include

• Structural Systems

• Payload Environmental Control

• Mechanical Systems

• Instrumentation and Electrical

• Assembly, Integration and Testing

• Operations and Ground Support

Key Technical Requirements

• Provide primary structural adapter connection between

SLS and MPCV

• Protect co-manifested payload post encapsulation through USA separation

• Provide necessary payload access post encapsulation for vehicle integration, system checkout, and processing

• Provide data and communication pass throughs from MPCV to the SLS EUS

• Provide reliable, contact and debris free separation without damaging or re-contacting the EUS, co-manifested payload, or MPCV

Flexible Flight Qualified Design

• The USA shall be space flight qualified through the life of the design, including the ability to reconfigure access doors and other intrusions to mission specific requirements

• Flexible structural design that meets requirements and margins without altering the primary load path while eliminating the need for requalification

• Provides for changing co-manifested payload and mission requirements

Personnel Access

Door Area

Equipment Access

Port Area

NOTIONAL access areas

Flexible USA Flight Configuration

• Mission Requirements dictate subsystem functionality

• Co-manifested payloads are undetermined and expected to have varying needs

• Subsystem capability and functionality will be based on mission specific co-manifested payload requirements

• Acoustic attenuation system

• Separation system

• Undefined co-manifested payloads require a flexible approach

Internal Volume Environment

• Provide environmental protection to co-manifested and secondary payloads

Cleanliness

• Internal volume cleanliness and humidity control

• Material out gassing and debris generation

• Purge system design

Thermal

• On-pad temperature control

• External ascent aerodynamic heating

• On-orbit radiative heating

• Trans-lunar injection heating

Acoustic

• Lift-off acoustics – 4 RS-25’s, 2 SRB’s w/IOP

• Transonic acoustics, shock wave formation, and buffet

Pressure

• Crush and burst pressure requirements

• Vent number, location, and lift-off isolation (acoustic short circuit)

SLS to MPCV Interface

• Provide electrical and communication paths between the EUS and MPCV

• Permits power, command, data transfer, communication, and ground path between

SLS and MPCV

• Compatible with SLS and MPCV connectors and interface panels (RS-422, 1553B)

• Capable of debris free separation of wiring and cables at USA separation plane during adapter jettison

• Provides adequate wiring support and separation disconnects without excessive structural point loads

• Includes OFI and DFI components

Related Technology Work

• Over the past 5-6 years the agency has sponsored a number of activities to raise the TRL of technologies identified as risk areas for structural composites.

• Although not exhaustive, a library of related technology reports will be posted to FedBizOps with these charts.

• Additionally, the NASA Technical Report Server has many technical documents relative to the same subject.

• NASA Technical Report Server library link:

http://ntrs.nasa.gov/ http://ntrs.nasa.gov/

9:00 – Kickoff Kathy Schubert

9:05 – Welcome from GRC Center Director Janet Kavandi

9:20 – Comments from MSFC/SLS Steve Creech

9:25 – Objectives & Guidance Jeff Hoyt

9:35 – Export Control/ITAR Dexter Johnson

9:45 – SLS USA Overview Joe Roche

10:00 – Overview of Technical Requirements Aaron Weaver

Tom Krivanek

10:15 – Launch Processing Chad Brown

10:30 – Break

10:45 – Response to Questions

11:00– Acquisition Overview & Mission Suitability Jeff Hoyt

11:15 – Past Performance Dan Saccomando

11:20 – Cost Heather Linden www.nasa.gov/sls

S p a c e

L a u n s t e mSpace Launch System Universal Stage Adapter Industry Day August 17, 2016

USA Concept of Operations

Chad E. Brown

General Ground Rules and Assumptions

GSDO Program’s GR&A for concept of operations for SLS USA

• Facility utilization will be driven by the payload customer

• GSDO will assess each customer needs per payload working with SLS SPIE

• PHSF is assumed for this presentation

• Assumes USA is shipped via barge to KSC on a wheeled transporter (Towable)

• SPMT or KAMAG (palletized) not mandatory for transport to offline processing facility

• Flight hardware can be received via other transportation modes

• Shipped with ordnance train (minus initiators) and acoustic treatment installed

• USA shipped via clean methods

• Bagged and or shipping container

• VC Standard cleaning still required prior to encapsulation

• USA lifting GSE used for offline processing (Encapsulation, GSE removal, etc…) will also be used for stacking operation with VAB

• PAF and USA integration operations will not require internal access

• Spacecraft height does not exceed USA height (does not protrude USA to Orion interface)

Block 1B Concept of Operation

ConOps Continued

High Level Concept of Operation for USA /Block 1B Including Co-manifested Payload

USA ConOps (detailed Sectored Configuration)

USA ConOps (detailed Canister Configuration)

KSC and GSDO Info Links

More Information on the GSDO Program and KSC Center Planning and

Development (CPD) can be found at the following links:

GSDO:

http://www.nasa.gov/exploration/systems/ground/index

.html http://www.nasa.gov/content/gsdo-news-and-resources

CPD:

http://www.nasa.gov/centers/kennedy/business/index.h tml http://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/prem ier-multiuser-spaceport.pdf http://masterplan.ksc.nasa.gov/ http://www.nasa.gov/exploration/systems/ground/index.html http://www.nasa.gov/content/gsdo-news-and-resources http://www.nasa.gov/centers/kennedy/business/index.html http://www.nasa.gov/sites/default/files/atoms/files/premier-multiuser-spaceport.pdf http://masterplan.ksc.nasa.gov/

9:00 – Kickoff Kathy Schubert

9:05 – Welcome from GRC Center Director Janet Kavandi

9:20 – Comments from MSFC/SLS Steve Creech

9:25 – Objectives & Guidance Jeff Hoyt

9:35 – Export Control/ITAR Dexter Johnson

9:45 – SLS USA Overview Joe Roche

10:00 – Overview of Technical Requirements Aaron Weaver

Tom Krivanek

10:15 – Launch Processing Chad Brown

10:30 – Break

10:45 – Response to Questions

11:00– Acquisition Overview & Mission Suitability Jeff Hoyt

11:15 – Past Performance Dan Saccomando

11:20 – Cost Heather Linden www.nasa.gov/sls

S p a c e

L a u n s t e mSpace Launch System Universal Stage Adapter Industry Day August 17, 2016

Acquisition Overview

Jeff Hoyt

NAICS Code and System for Award Management

• NAICS - North American Industry Classification

System

• SLS USA procurement NAICS code:

• 336419, Other Guided Missile and Space Vehicle

Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing

• Size Standard – 1,000 employees

• If not already registered, offerors should register for this NAICS code in the System for Award

Management (SAM) website at www.sam.gov

• SAM is free, Government-run, and any potential contract awardee must be registered in SAM http://www.sam.gov/

Contract Line Item Number (CLIN) Structure

• CLIN 1 - USA EM-2 DDT&E and Associated Data

• CLIN 2 - USA EM-2 Flight Unit Production, Acceptance, and Delivery

• CLIN 3 - Post-Delivery Vehicle Integration and Support

• CLIN 4 – Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ)

• Minimum limit $0, Maximum limit $8M

• Tasks either FFP or CPAF

• Covers Contract Award to EM-8 Flight Unit Delivery

• The Contractor will perform tasks as directed by NASA to support special USA-related studies, analyses and/or integration support not covered under another CLIN

• CLIN 5 - Option 1 – USA EM-3 Flight Unit

• CLIN 6 - Option 2 – USA EM-4 Flight Unit

• CLIN 7 - Option 3 – USA EM-5 Flight Unit

• CLIN 8 - Option 4 – USA EM-6 Flight Unit

• CLIN 9 - Option 5 – USA EM-7 Flight Unit

• CLIN 10 - Option 6 – USA EM-8 Flight Unit

Small Business Information

• NASA Glenn Research Center Small Business Specialist – Eunice Adams-Sipp

• 216-433-6644

• eunice.j.adams-sipp@nasa.gov

• Can provide GRC-specific information, or additional contact information to other NASA center Small Business Specialists

• SLS USA Small Business Subcontracting Goals:

• RFP will request offerors to submit time-phased goals

Socioeconomic Category

Goal as percentage of total contract value

Small Businesses (SB) 9.0%

Small Disadvantaged Business Concerns (SDB) 2.5%

Women Owned Small Business Concerns (WOSB) 2.5%

Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCU)/Minority

Institutions(MI) 0.1%

HUBZone Small Business Concerns (HBZ) 0.4%

Veteran Owned Small Business Concerns (VOSB) 0.8%

Service-Disabled Veteran-Owned Small Business Concerns (SDVOSB) 0.5% mailto:eunice.j.adams-sipp@nasa.gov

Contract Type – Cost Plus Award Fee

• CPAF for base and options, NASA FAR Clause 1852.216-77 Award Fee for End Item Contracts included in the DRFP

• A draft USA Performance Evaluation Plan is provided in the DRFP

• The existing SLS Performance Evaluation Board will be utilized

• Fee Determination Official is the Deputy Associate Administrator for Exploration Systems Development

• Interim performance evaluations will be conducted every 6 months

• Areas of Emphasis (AOEs) will be utilized and mid-term feedback will be provided

• Management, cost management, technical performance, schedule management, and small business/small disadvantage business subcontracting requirements of the contract will be evaluated

• A written corrective action response will be required to address major weaknesses identified in the performance evaluations

DDT&E Production

• Activities to be performed include but are not limited to:

• Design & Development Engineering

• Fabrication of qualification test articles and flight article

• Qualification and acceptance testing

• Use of government facilities and/or GFP may be identified in offeror’s proposal to be managed as

Government Task Agreements

• Requests can be made using attachment 17 of 19 DRFP Att J.2-8

Government Task Agreement Instructions

• Participate in SLS SPIE project milestone reviews and integration

Deliverable Items List

• Universal Stage Adapter Qualification Test Article(s)

• Universal Stage Adapter Flight Articles

• Payload Encapsulation Tooling

• Flight Article Lifting Strongback

• Transportation Hardware and Trailer

• Internal Access Platforms Ground Support Equipment

(GSE)

Management Information Requirements

• The contractor shall be required to utilize an Earned

Value Management System (EVMS) that complies with ANSI/EIA-748, “Standard Industry Guidelines for

Earned Value Management (EVM) Systems”

• NF-533 Monthly and Quarterly reports are required

• 1852.234-70 Engineering Change Proposals

Alternative II clause in the contract to manage contract changes

Logistics Considerations

• Contractor will be responsible for operating within the safety, reliability, quality, and logistics requirements for work performed at various NASA locations

• Contractor will be responsible for all logistics associated with transportation, shipping, and bonded storage of the USA and associated ground support hardware

Data Rights and Security

• DRFP contains 52.227-14 Rights in Data-General clause as modified by NFS 1852.227-14, with Alternates II and III.

• The Contractor shall submit unlimited rights in data for all data first produced in the performance of the contract

• Can submit Limited Rights Data in accordance with Alt II and restricted computer software in accordance with Alt III

• Information Technology (IT)

• The Contractor shall provide an IT Security Management Plan and/or IT Systems Security Plan per NFS clause 1852.204-76

Security Requirements for Unclassified Information Technology

Resources – after contract award

• Technology Protection/Security

• Some information produced under this contract may be subject to

International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) control and cannot be exported per NPR 2190.1

Safety and Quality Assurance

• The contractor shall comply with the Center specific Safety Manuals, as well as the Occupational Health Programs Manuals for work performed at those

Centers

• Safety and Health

• Safety & Health Plan, a Type 1 Deliverable, will be required 30 days after contract award. Updates may be required prior to the use of a NASA facility

• Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP)

• The QASP will be finalized by the Government after contract award

• Reliability and System Safety Engineering

• Contractor will be required to implement a reliability and system safety program to assure flight safety and reliability

• Participation in the Government-Industry Data Exchange Program (GIDEP)

Alert System will be required

• Contractor will be responsible for establishing and maintaining a Quality

Management System (QMS) certified to or in compliance with the AS9100 and ISO9001

Miscellaneous Acquisition Considerations

• GFP that NASA is offering to proposers to integrate into the USA design and/or flight configurations

• Pyrotechnic initiators (NSIs) and Standard Detonators

(NSDs)

• No NASA provided Ground Support Equipment offered

• Contract funding will be incremental, and NF-

533/EVM data will be utilized for creating funding timelines

Miscellaneous Acquisition Considerations (Cont.)

• Provisions K.13 and L.21 in attachment “3 of 19 DRFP

Sections B-M” provides the minimum requirements an offeror must meet in order to propose to the SLS USA acquisition. An Offeror’s failure to meet the minimum requirements will deem the Offeror’s proposal an unacceptable proposal and therefore the proposal will be eliminated from further evaluation

• Proposal Limitations – If your organization (or first tier subcontractors) has one or more contracts with NASA, we suggest that your organization check those contracts for any clauses that may impact your organization’s ability to propose to the USA RFP

• For example, NASA FAR Supplement clause 1852.209-71

Limitation of Future Contracting. (December 1988)

Contract Administration

•Contract administration will by performed by GRC, with close ties to MSFC/SLS

• The USA Sub-Element Manager, Contracting Officer (CO), and

Contracting Officer Representative (COR) / Alternate COR responsibilities are assigned to GRC

•Administrative Delegations

•The Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA) may be delegated administrative functions in accordance with FAR

42.302(a) such as:

‒Property Administration

‒Quality Assurance

‒Plant Clearance

•Technical Delegations

•Surveillance responsibility will be delegated by the CO to the COR and Alternate COR

Notional Procurement Schedule

Event Date

Draft RFP Release August 1, 2016

Industry Day August 17, 2016

Comments on Draft

RFP Due August 31, 2016

Final RFP Release October 3, 2016

Volume II Early

Submittal November 18, 2016

Proposal Due Date December 2, 2016

Contract Award August 1, 2017

Evaluation Factors

• Contract award based on FAR Part 15 – Contracting by

Negotiation

• Relative Importance of Evaluation Factors:

• Mission Suitability, Relevant Experience and Past Performance and Cost are all approximately equal in importance. Mission

Suitability and Relevant Experience and Past Performance, when combined, are significantly more important than Cost.

• Only Mission Suitability will be scored 1000 points

• Subfactor A. Technical Approach (TA) 550 points

• Subfactor B. Management Approach (MA) 350 points

• Subfactor C. Small Business Utilization (SB) 100 points

Mission Suitability Subfactors

• Subfactor A. Technical Approach (TA)

• TA1: Design and Development Approach

• TA2: Qualification, Acceptance and Mission Assurance

Approach

• TA3: Manufacturing, Assembly and Materials Certification

Approach and Capabilities

• Subfactor B. Management Approach (MA)

• MA1: Organizational and Management Effectiveness

• MA2: Integrated Master Schedule and Approach to

Schedule Management

• MA3: Integrated Risk Management Approach

• Subfactor C. Small Business Utilization (SB)

• SB1: Small Business Plan

• SB2: Commitment to Small Businesses

9:00 – Kickoff Kathy Schubert

9:05 – Welcome from GRC Center Director Janet Kavandi

9:20 – Comments from MSFC/SLS Steve Creech

9:25 – Objectives & Guidance Jeff Hoyt

9:35 – Export Control/ITAR Dexter Johnson

9:45 – SLS USA Overview Joe Roche

10:00 – Overview of Technical Requirements Aaron Weaver

Tom Krivanek

10:15 – Launch Processing Chad Brown

10:30 – Break

10:45 – Response to Questions

11:00– Acquisition Overview & Mission Suitability Jeff Hoyt

11:15 – Past Performance Dan Saccomando

11:20 – Cost Heather Linden www.nasa.gov/sls

S p a c e

L a u n s t e mSpace Launch System Universal Stage Adapter Industry Day August 17, 2016

Past Performance

Dan Saccomando

Relevant Experience and Past Performance

• Three tier approach to Relevant Experience and Past

Performance:

• Tier I – Volume II: Past Performance Narrative (30 pages)

• Tier II – Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) responses

• Tier III – Past Performance Database search

‒Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS)

‒Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System

(CPARS)

• Relevancy- The Government will evaluate aerospace hardware contracts, subcontracts, and projects that are similar in size and scope.

• Greater than $30M

• Performed within the past 10 years.

Relevant Experience and Past Performance

• Major subcontractors, for the purpose of Relevant Experience and Past Performance, are any subcontractors performing 10% or more of the total proposed contract effort, including options

• PPQ responses should be directed to

Daniel.M.Saccomando@nasa.gov

• We request that Volume II, Past Performance Narrative, be submitted 2 weeks before the due date:

• Requested submission date – November 18, 2016

• Due Date – December 2, 2016

9:00 – Kickoff Kathy Schubert

9:05 – Welcome from GRC Center Director Janet Kavandi

9:20 – Comments from MSFC/SLS Steve Creech

9:25 – Objectives & Guidance Jeff Hoyt

9:35 – Export Control/ITAR Dexter Johnson

9:45 – SLS USA Overview Joe Roche

10:00 – Overview of Technical Requirements Aaron Weaver

Tom Krivanek

10:15 – Launch Processing Chad Brown

10:30 – Break

10:45 – Response to Questions

11:00– Acquisition Overview & Mission Suitability Jeff Hoyt

11:15 – Past Performance Dan Saccomando

11:20 – Cost Heather Linden www.nasa.gov/sls

S p a c e

L a u n s t e mSpace Launch System Universal Stage Adapter Industry Day August 17, 2016

Cost Factor

Heather Linden

• Follow RFP instructions, “L.23 Proposal

Information to be Provided by Offeror”

• Cost Volume Part 1: General Cost Information

• Introduction

• Price Summary by Government Fiscal Year

• Financial Capability to perform the contract

• Subcontractor Cost Analysis ‒ Major subcontractors have a contract value equal to or greater than 20% of the total contract value

‒ Major subcontractors are those significantly contributing to the completion of either the Separation System, 4.1.4.1 or Primary Structures, 4.1.6.1.

• Escalation

• Business Systems Reviews and Status Information

• Cost Volume Part 2: Cost Templates

• Three Excel Workbooks

• Templates have pre-populated formulas

• Offeror is responsible for the accuracy of these formulas and editing/correcting them as necessary

• Offeror is instructed to reference the Work Breakdown

Structure when completing the templates; the cost templates align with the WBS elements in the statement of work

• Cost Volume Part 3: Basis of Estimate

• Cost narrative to support proposed estimates

• Links the Cost Volume to the Mission Suitability

Volume

• Cost realism analysis will be conducted

• Total proposed price consists of the four-year base performance period, the six, two-year option periods, and the Government’s cost estimates received by the offerors for use of Government facilities via Government Task Agreements

• Cost evaluation will include

• Status of Offerors business systems and audits

• Evaluation of the proposed award fee amount and rates will be conducted

9:00 – Kickoff Kathy Schubert

9:05 – Welcome from GRC Center Director Janet Kavandi

9:20 – Comments from MSFC/SLS Steve Creech

9:25 – Objectives & Guidance Jeff Hoyt

9:35 – Export Control/ITAR Dexter Johnson

9:45 – SLS USA Overview Joe Roche

10:00 – Overview of Technical Requirements Aaron Weaver

Tom Krivanek

10:15 – Launch Processing Chad Brown

10:30 – Break

10:45 – Response to Questions

11:00– Acquisition Overview & Mission Suitability Jeff Hoyt

11:15 – Past Performance Dan Saccomando

11:20 – Cost Heather Linden

1:00 – 1:40 Overview of NASA Facilities

GRC- Plum Brook Richard Sorge/NASA GRC

MSFC Mike Roberts/NASA MSFC

1:40 – 1:50 Break

1:50 – 2:15 Response to Questions & Afternoon Wrap Up

2:30 – 5:00 One on One Meetings with Industry

One-on-one meetings with DRFP team

One-on-one meeting with Facilities Reps www.nasa.gov/sls

S p a c e

L a u n s t e mSpace Launch System Universal Stage Adapter Industry Day August 17, 2016

GRC- Plum Brook

Richard Sorge / NASA GRC

Space Power Facility (SPF) NASA Glenn Research Center

Plum Brook Station

6100 Columbus Avenue

Sandusky, Ohio 44870

POC

Space Power Facility

Points of Contact

Jerry Carek 419.621.3219 gerald.a.carek@nasa.gov Facility Mgr.

Rick Sorge 419.621.3270 richard.n.sorge@nasa.gov Test Mgr.

mailto:gerald.a.carek@nasa.gov mailto:richard.n.sorge@nasa.gov

SPF Environmental Testing Facilities

• World’s largest space environment simulation chamber

• New facilities:

• Reverberant Acoustic Chamber

• Mechanical Sine-Vibration System

• Reverberant-mode EMI/EMC

Assembly and Integration Area

Thermal/Vacuum and EMI/EMC

Test Areas

Mechanical and Acoustic Vibration

Test Area

Space Power Facility

- Space Environment Simulation

Vacuum Chamber

Vacuum Test Chamber

Vacuum Test Chamber

– Largest space simulation vacuum chamber in the world w/ volume

~ 800,000 ft3

– 100 foot diameter cylinder, hemisphere height is 122 feet, height under polar crane 110 feet

– Continuous high-vacuum capability using 10 cryopumps (1 x 10-5 torr)

– Capable of removing non-condensing gases with 5 turbomolecular pumps

– Roughing pumps, turbomolecular pumps, and cryopumps reach high-vacuum in 8 hours

Delta IV - EELVAtlas Fairing

Ariane 5

Atlas V - EELV

TitanSky Lab Centaur

Ariane 5 / Atlas V

Space Power Facility (SPF) – Full-Scale Fairing Tests

Ariane 5 HSS3 / HSS3+

Space Power Facility (SPF) – Full-Scale Fairing Tests

SpaceX Falcon 9 Vers. 1.1

- Vibroacoustic Facilities

Vibroacoustic Facilities

Mechanical

Vibration

Facility

Reverberant

Acoustic

Facility

Reverberant Acoustic Test Facility

Reverberant Acoustic Test Facility

Horn Cutoff Frequency

Hz

Hz

Hz

Hz

Hz

Hz

Hz

Modulator Type

MK

VII

MK

VII

MK

VII

MK

VII

MK

VI

MK

VI

WAS

Qty. 2 2 4 3 4 8 13

RATF

• Physical Dimensions: 37.5’ W x 47.5’ L x 57’ H, Volume = 101,189 ft3

• Overall Sound Pressure Level 163 dB (empty chamber maximum)

• M+P Acoustic Control System

• LN2 Storage Facilities and Real-Time GN2 Vaporization Provides:

• Chamber GN2 pre-purge

• Incremental stepwise dB increments (-12 dB, -9 dB, -6 dB, -3 dB)

• 10 minute run time at final 0 dB set-point

• 70,000 Cubic Feet/Minute nitrogen gas generation to acoustic modulators

• 36 acoustic modulators (23 servohydraulic, 13 electro-pneumatic)

• 12 Team Corp. Mark VI - 150 kW

• 11 Team Corp. Mark VII - 200 kW

• 13 Wyle WAS5000 – 10kW

• Over 4 million acoustic watts

Reverberant Acoustic Facility

RATF maximum tested capability to date: 162.6 dB OASPL

Acoustic Tests

ATK MegaFlex (Stowed)SpaceX 5m Fairing

Orion E-STA Service Module

Orion Crew Module Back-Shell Panel

Mechanical Vibration Facility

• 6 degree of freedom, 3-axis servo-hydraulic vibration system

• 75,000 lb @ 23.6’ Cg payload

• 2 -150 Hz.; 1.25 g’s vertical

• 2 -150 Hz.; 1.0 g’s horizontal

• Change vibration axis without removing test article

• Data Physics 64-channel closed-loop vibration control system

• Analog abort system

• 64-channel National Instruments

CompactRIO

• 24 Trig Tek Model 530A tracking filters on MVF control channels

• 4.5 million pound reaction mass

• Modal plate anchored to reaction mass

• Headroom of 67’ under crane bridge

• Four concentric bolt-circles for mounting

Mechanical Vibration Facility

Shaker System Movies

Modal Facility

• MVF seismic mass includes a ‘Modal Plate’. A 6” steel slab with >11E6 lb/in stiffness mounted to the 4.5 million pound seismic mass

• Several fixed-base modal tests have been performed on the plate

• Lewis Field Structural Dynamics group provides portable shakers, data acquisition, test, and analysis services

• Threaded holes match MVF table mounting pattern

- Facility Infrastructure

Facility Staffing

• Current Core Team Staff includes 8 civil servants and 24 support service contractors

• 13 engineers

• 19 technicians

• Average personnel experience base at the facility is 8 years

• Disciplined technical experts:

• Vacuum Systems

• Thermal Systems

• Mechanical Systems

• Contamination Control

• Electrical/Data Instrumentation Systems

• Vibroacoustic Systems

• Key Personnel have security clearance

- Miscellaneous Support Systems

Facility Support Systems

● 6,000 GPM cooling tower water

● Gaseous nitrogen (276,000 SCF@ 2400 psig)

● Two 70,000 SCF GN2 roadable trailer stations

● Service/instrument air system - 105 psig

● Dual-redundant electrical substation

– 14 MW total

– 7 MW available for Vacuum Chamber

● Facility-wide intercom/paging system

● Office Building (16,000 sq. ft.) w/46 offices

● Thermal-Vacuum Control Room (900 sq. ft.)

● Vibroacoustic Control Room (1800 sq. ft.)

● Control Room Auxiliary Space (1450 sq. ft.)

● Locker Room (1300 sq. ft.)

Facility Support Systems

● Man Lifts

– One, 125-foot, two-man, electric-powered, JLG-1250 Boom Lift

– Three, 30-foot, one-man, electric-powered, JLG AM-30

Vertical Lifts

– One, 41-foot, one-man, electric-powered, JLG AM-41 Vertical lift

– One, 35-foot, one-man, electric-powered, RAL 55-32 Rotating Mast, Aerial Work Platform

– One, 80-foot, two-man, propane-powered, JLG-800

Boom Lift

– 20-foot electric scissor lift, extending platform

– Six, Ballymore cantilever, adjustable lifts

● Tow-Tractor

– Electric-powered

– Remote control (on rails)

– 5,000 lb draw-bar pull

● Fork-Lifts

– Four facility fork-lifts available, one electric

● 35-Ton Mobile Crane available

1:00 – 1:40 Overview of NASA Facilities

GRC- Plum Brook Richard Sorge/NASA GRC

MSFC Mike Roberts/NASA MSFC

1:40 – 1:50 Break

1:50 – 2:15 Response to Questions & Afternoon Wrap Up

2:30 – 5:00 One on One Meetings with Industry

One-on-one meetings with DRFP team

One-on-one meeting with Facilities Reps www.nasa.gov/sls

S p a c e

L a u n s t e mSpace Launch System Universal Stage Adapter Industry Day August 17, 2016

MSFC

SLS TEST FACILITIES

CAPABILITIES, TEST SUPPORT EQUIPMENT AND

LESSONS LEARNED

Mike Roberts

Test Stand 4699 Test Stand 4699

• Description:

‒MSFC West Test Area

‒Environment – Outside

‒Structural steel towers for shear

‒Structural steel test fixtures (spiders, pedestals) for axial, moment

‒Accommodates test articles up to 33’ D, ~55’ tall

• Test Stand Reaction Capability:

‒Axial

• 2400 kips

• For 28’ D test article

• Achieved via test fixtures (spiders, pedestals)

‒Shear

• 250 kips at 65’ (single axis shear only)

• Çryo/Fluids:

–Large volume cryo capability (LN2)

–High pressure gases (GN2, MGA, GHe)

• Safety/Hazards

‒Designed for hazardous testing

• Past Test

‒ALTA – 1997, MSA – 2014, CCTD – 2014, ISPE – 2016

ISPE Test Set-up at 4699

Upper Spider

Main Pedestal

4699 Test Stand

Lower Spider

Access Plaforms

ISPE STA

6/24/2016 113

Notional USA Test Description

Structural Test:

•Test Requirements:

‒Primary Axial, Moment, Shear, Torsion – Limit & Ultimate

‒No Thermal Conditioning (No Cryo)

‒No pressure or vacuum ‒Able to perform Test To Failure

•Test Setup will be in Test Stand 4699:

Dynamic Test:

•TBD

6/24/2016 114

Lower Spider

5.00'

2.31'

48.19'

Shear Beam

Upper Spider

Core Stage

Simulator

MPCV

Simulator

Load Ring

Existing Hardware from Test Stand 4699

From ISPE Qual Test**

USA STA

From MSA Qual Test**

USA STA

PAF RING

• Test Support Equipment – the following MSFC hardware is available for structural test at Test Stand 4699:

• Existing Test Fixtures at Test Stand 4699

‒Shear Towers ‒Upper and Lower Spiders ‒Pedestals – one from MSA test (shorter), one from ISPE test (taller) ‒Load Ring (interfaces with MPCV Simulator and Upper Spider) ‒Load Line Hardware – Hydraulic Cylinders, Load Cells, Swivel Eye Brackets, etc.

• Existing Simulators ‒MPCV Simulator

• Fabricated by MSFC per dwg 97M15354

• Simulates MPCV and designed to interface with MSA

• Used on MSA and ISPE qualification tests

‒Core Stage Simulator

• Fabricated by MSFC per dwg 97M15410

• Simulate the Core Stage Fwd Skirt and designed to interface with LVSA

• Same as used on ISPE qualification test

6/24/2016

Available Test Support Equipment

• Test Systems available and existing at 4699:

‒Data Acquisition System

‒Load Control System

‒Load Lines (Hydraulic Cylinders, Load Cells, Swivel Eye Bracket, adapters)

‒Cryo Delivery/Pressure Control

‒LN2, GN2, MGA

‒Thermal Control

6/24/2016

Available Marshall Test Support

• MSFC Personnel:

‒Test Conductor

‒Test Integrator

‒Test Engineer

‒Test Fixtures Design / Analysis

‒Test Technicians

‒Lift Crews

‒Safety

‒Quality

‒Logistics

‒SPIE Analysis Oversight

6/24/2016

Available MSFC Test Support

• MSFC Documentation ‒Test Fixture design drawings including test setup dwg

‒Buildup procedure TPS (test preparation sheet)

‒Calibration Sheets

‒Test Procedure

‒Test Discrepancy Report (TDR)

‒Test Design Review

‒Test Readiness Review (TRR)

‒Test Report including all Test Data

6/24/2016

Available MSFC Test Support

• Offeror to provide support for USA Structural Test

• Offeror Personnel

‒Test Requester – key person ‒Test Designer ‒Test Analysts ‒Test Integrator

• Offeror Tasks ‒Design/Build STA ‒Design/Build lifting hardware for STA ‒Support all test planning meetings (regular planning mtgs plus milestone mtgs such as test design reviews, TIMs, safety reviews, and TRRs)

‒Establish test requirements ‒Establish pre-test predictions ‒Support test stackup ‒Support test conduct

NOTE 1: Must have test personnel support throughout test design/test conduct cycle

NOTE 2: More details required for several tasks, esp.

requirements.

6/24/2016

Notional Offeror Test Support

• Offeror to provide the following documentation ‒STA drawing

‒Test Requirements Document (TRD / Test Plan)

‒Preservation & Protection Requirements

‒Access requirements during test (for NDE and other inspection).

‒Lifting Hardware & Instructions

‒Instrumentation Drawing

‒Test Article – post test disposition (pending ownership of STA)

‒Schedule

6/24/2016

Notional Offeror Test Support

• ISPE Lessons Learned

• Establish enveloping test requirements NLT 18 months before test with detailed test cases NLT 6 months before test.

• Must have test support throughout design/test cycle:

‒Support all test planning meetings (regular planning mtgs plus milestone mtgs such as test design reviews, TIMs, safety reviews, and TRRs)

‒Establish test requirements ‒Establish pre-test predictions ‒Support test conduct ‒Support test stackup

• Test deliverables that MSFC requires to perform test*** ‒Schedule ‒STA drawings ‒Test Requirements Document (TRD / Test Plan) ‒Preservation & Protection Requirements ‒Access requirements during test (for NDE and other inspection).

‒Lifting Hardware & Instructions ‒Instrumentation Dwg ‒Test Article – post test disposition (pending ownership of STA)

***NOTE: Some of these warrant more details, especially TRD.

ISPE Qual Test Lessons Learned

• ISPE Lessons Learned (cont’d)

• Offeror must identify all hardware necessary to qualify STA. If they believe that simulators are necessary, then they should either provide them or at least identify the need for them.

• Offeror must have Test Integrator or one point of contact.

• Get agreements on all interfaces including who supplies what.

• Establish ownership of the Structural Test Article

• Logistics – delivery to MSFC Dock is sufficient. Drive off to test stand is preferable, but MSFC can supply a crane and KMAG at the dock for transport to test stand.

• NASA and Offeror both provide Quality

6/24/2016

ISPE Qual Test Lessons Learned

• Richard Stroud

• Phone 256-544-6194

• E-Mail: richard.t.stroud@nasa.gov

• Mike Roberts

• Phone: 256-544-7506

• E-Mail: michael.g.roberts@nasa.gov

6/24/2016

Contacts mailto:richard.t.stroud@nasa.gov mailto:michael.g.roberts@nasa.gov

1:00 – 1:40 Overview of NASA Facilities

GRC- Plum Brook Richard Sorge/NASA GRC

MSFC Mike Roberts/NASA MSFC

1:40 – 1:50 Break

1:50 – 2:15 Response to Questions & Afternoon Wrap Up

2:30 – 5:00 One on One Meetings with Industry

One-on-one meetings with DRFP team

One-on-one meeting with Facilities Reps

Back up

KSC VAB Access

KSC Mobile Launcher

KSC PHSF Concept of Operations

KSC PHSF Encapsulation Process Height Analysis

MSFC Test Fixtures in 4619 LTA

Bldg 4619 LTA •Description:

‒Current Location – Bldg 4619 LTA ‒Alternate Locations – 4693 or 4697 ‒Environment – Inside, Outside ‒Structural steel towers ~58’ tall ‒Accommodates various sized test articles

‒Requires anchor points on 18” centers

•Reaction Capability:

‒Axial (reacted via floor anchors)

• Compression – 3500 kips per main tower

• Tension – 5000 kips per main tower ‒Shear

• Main Towers – 500 kips

• Tangential Towers – 400 kips

‒Concrete reaction floor

• Anchor points on 18” centers

• 110 kips tension, 18 kips shear per anchor •Çryo/Fluids:

‒Can accommodate cryo testing at 4619 (limited), along with 4693 and 4697 (full)

•Safety/Hazards ‒No limitations

8/17/2015 NASA MSFC Structural

Strength Test Branch

MSFC ISPE Test Processes and Procedures

ED-OWI-004

Test Program

Control

ET01-SST-OWI-900

SST Work Process

Control

90MXXXXX

STE Drawings

Facility Operating Procedures

Test Preparation Sheets

SLS-SPIE-PLAN-033

ISPE IST Test

Implementation Plan

SLS-SPIE-RQMT-023

ISPE STA Test Requirements

STA ASSEMBLY

DWG

Instrumentation Dwgs

Test and Checkout Procedure

(TCP)

ET30 TEST DATA

PACKAGE

ICPS, LVSA, MSA

Test Requirements

90MXXXXX

TEST SETUP

Drawing

STA Dwgs

Simulator Dwgs

TEST READINESS

REVIEW

TE

ST

R

EQ

U

IR

EM

EN

TS

TE

ST

D

ES

IG

N

SLS-SPIE-PLAN-010

ISPE V&V Plan

ISPE STRUCTURAL

TEST VALIDATION

PACKAGE

ISPE STRUCTURAL

TEST VCN

ICPS, LVSA, MSA

Test Validation

PackagesV

V

SLS-SPIE-RQMT-002

ISPE Requirements

6/24/2016

SLS USA Industry Day: August 17, 20166/24/2016

MSFC ISPE Qual Test Organization Chart

SPIE Project Element Manager

Chris Crumbly

Test Engineer

ET

Dee VanCleave (Lead)

Nick Hensley

Test EDLE

Mike Roberts

Test Integrator

EV

Andre Miller

LVSA Test Team

(TBE)

Dan Jett Tamra Ozbolt

ICPS Test Team

Cataldo Mazzola (Boeing) Veronica Fecht (ULA)

NASA Analysis

EV

Brian Steeve

NASA Logistics

AS

Jeff Adams

NASA Mfg

EM

Jon Street

NASA Quality

QD

Wade Blass

NASA Safety

QD

Bryan Jones

NASA Design

EV

Steve Benefield

NASA GSE

EO

Chief Engineer

(new) Jeff Dilg

(former) Rene Ortega

NASA Fab

ES

Myron Tapscott

SPIE STA Lead

Keith Higginbotham

MSA Test Team

(NASA)

Brian Steeve

NASA Systems Engr.

EV

Ward Overton