About this file

This solicitation notice is for local guard services at two Navy facilities in Jacksonville, Florida. The services include all labor, supervision, management, tools, materials, and equipment for guard operations at Fleet Logistics Center Jacksonville Heckshire Fuel Terminal and Defense Logistics Agency Distribution Naval Air Station Jacksonville. The procurement is a competitive set-aside for service-disabled veteran-owned small businesses. The solicitation will utilize a best value source selection based on technical proposal, past performance, and price. The contract term is one base year plus four one-year options for a total of five years. The site visit is scheduled for July 18, 2019 and offerors must register by July 10. The anticipated solicitation release is on or after July 9, 2019. Award will be made to the offeror providing the best value to the government.

Corporate Experience

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
N6945019R1830_AMENDMENT_0007.pdf PDF
N6945019R1830_AMEND_0006.pdf PDF
N6945019R1830_AMEND_0005.pdf PDF
N6945019R1830_SECTION_J_0005.pdf PDF
JL-7_N6945019R1830_GPI_Responses_0004.pdf PDF
N6945019R1830_SECTION_F_AMENDMENT0004.pdf PDF
N6945019R1830_AMEND_0004.pdf PDF
N6945019R1830_SECTION_C_AMENDMENT0004.pdf PDF
N6945019R1830_SECTION_J_AMENDMENT0004.pdf PDF
N6945019R1830_AMEND_0003.pdf PDF
N6945019R1830_WD15-4539(REV-9)_AMEND0003.pdf PDF
JL-7_N6945019R1830_GPI_Responses_0002.pdf PDF
N6945019R1830_AMEND_0002.pdf PDF
JM-1_N6945019R1830_Corporate_Experience_0002.docx DOCX document
N6945019R1830_SECTION_J_AMENDMENT0002.pdf PDF
JM-3_N6945019R1830_PPQ_0002.docx DOCX document
N6945019R1830_SECTION_F_AMENDMENT0002.pdf PDF
JL-6_N6945019R1830_SiteVisitAttendees.pdf PDF
JL-5_N6945019R1830_SiteVisitBrief.pdf PDF
N6945019R1830_AMEND_0001.pdf PDF
JL-2_N6945019R1830_AMAG.xls XLS spreadsheet
JM-3_N6945019R1830_PPQ.pdf PDF
N6945019R1830.pdf PDF
J-0200000-07_ELINs.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
J-0200000-06_N6945019R1830_CNRSEINST41011B.pdf PDF
JL-4_N6945019R1830_Site_Visit_Itinerary.pdf PDF
N6945019R1830_SECTION_C.pdf PDF
N6945919R1830_SECTION_F.pdf PDF
JL-3_N6945019R1830_SECNAV5512.pdf PDF
JM-2_N6945019R1830_Safety_Data.pdf PDF
J-0200000-02_N6945019R1830_WD15-4539(REV-8).pdf PDF
JL-1_N6945019R1830_GPIF.xls XLS spreadsheet
N69450-19-R-1830_SECTION_J.pdf PDF
N6945019R1830_N6945019R1830_SECNAV5512.pdf PDF
N6945019R1830_N6945019R1830_AMAG.xls XLS spreadsheet
Show all 35

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Local Guard Services N69450-19-R-1830

Naval Air Station Jacksonville, FL

SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION

DISCLOSURE LIMITATIONS AS OUTLINED IN FAR 2.101 & 3.104 APPLY

Contractor Information (Firm Name): ________________________________________________

Client Information (Name): ________________________________________________________

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.

1. QUALITY:

a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts E VG S M U N

b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance E VG S M U N

c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance

E VG S M U N

d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)

E VG S M U N

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)

E VG S M U N

b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract

E VG S M U N

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project? E VG S M U N

b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes; responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)

E VG S M U N

c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer?

E VG S M U N

d) Overall customer satisfaction E VG S M U N

4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR

a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force?

E VG S M U N

b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort E VG S M U N

c) Government Property Control E VG S M U N

d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel E VG S M U N

e) Utilization of Small Business concerns E VG S M U N

f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines E VG S M U N

g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes

E VG S M U N

h) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)

E VG S M U N

5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT

a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)?

E VG S M U N

Local Guard Services N69450-19-R-1830

Naval Air Station Jacksonville, FL

SOURCE SELECTION SENSITIVE INFORMATION

DISCLOSURE LIMITATIONS AS OUTLINED IN FAR 2.101 & 3.104 APPLY

Contractor Information (Firm Name): ________________________________________________

Client Information (Name): ________________________________________________________

b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefited the client

E VG S M U N

c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budgets and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances

(under runs or overruns)

E VG S M U N

d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If no, please explain in Remarks section.

Yes No

e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below.

Yes No

f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below.

Yes No

6. SAFETY/SECURITY

a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues? (Includes:

following the users rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)

E VG S M U N

b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements.

E VG S M U N

7. GENERAL

a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or surge situations (including notifying COR, PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues).

E VG S M U N

b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues) E VG S M U N

c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below) Yes No

d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor.

E VG S M U N

Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks.

Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary):

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .