RFQ Amend 03_N6264926QE025.pdf

R

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

16C. DATE SIGNED

Previous edition unusable STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016) Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY CODE 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X) 9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBE

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

CODE FACILITY CODE

SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

Block 14 (Description of Amendment/Modification):

The purpose of this amendment 0003 is to;

(1) update and renumber PWS Atch (6), and

(2) respond to the vendor's pre-quotations number 18 through 23. Please see the attached "Amendment 0003" for details.

Through this amendment, the PWS References have been updated & distributed, PWS Atch (6), Solicitation Atch (A) & Solicitation Atch (B) have been updated, and certain sections for the solicitation have been revised.

Solicitation/Contract Form Continuation

The following changes have been made:

INFORMATION FROM TO

Response Due Date 17 Aug 2026 31 Aug 2026

N6264926QE0250003

Continuation of Deliveries or Performance

The delivery information for the following CLIN(s) / SLIN(s) / ELIN(s) were modified:

INFORMATION FROM TO

Period of Performance 01 Sep 2026 to 31 Aug 2031 15 Sep 2026 to 14 Sep 2031

INFORMATION FROM TO

Period of Performance 01 Sep 2026 to 31 Aug 2031 15 Sep 2026 to 14 Sep 2031

INFORMATION FROM TO

Period of Performance 01 Sep 2026 to 31 Aug 2031 15 Sep 2026 to 14 Sep 2031

Option Line Item 1001

INFORMATION FROM TO

Period of Performance 01 Sep 2031 to 29 Feb 2032 15 Sep 2031 to 14 Mar 2032

Option Line Item 1002

INFORMATION FROM TO

Period of Performance 01 Sep 2031 to 29 Feb 2032 15 Sep 2031 to 14 Mar 2032

Option Line Item 1003

INFORMATION FROM TO

Period of Performance 01 Sep 2031 to 29 Feb 2032 15 Sep 2031 to 14 Mar 2032

Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified to:

[Place of Performance: Sasebo, Japan]

F 1.0 - DELIVERY LOCATION

The delivery location and/or place of performance is Sasebo, Japan. Read any references to SRF AND JRMC "YOKOSUKA" as "SASEBO." Actual delivery location will be specified in each task order (refer to PWS para 4.1.3).

[End of F 1.0 DELIVERY LOCATION]

F 2.0 PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE AND ORDERING PERIOD (IDIQ)

Note: The stated ordering basic period is tentative. It may change at the Government convenience.

(a) Parent Contract Ordering Period:

The ordering period of this Indefinite Delivery, Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) contract shall be a single, continuous five (5) year period. There are no annual option periods to exercise. The ordering basic period is structured as follows:

Year 1: 15 Sep 2026 through 14 Sep 2027 Year 2: 15 Sep 2027 through 14 Sep 2028 Year 3: 15 Sep 2028 through 14 Sep 2029 Year 4: 15 Sep 2029 through 14 Sep 2030 Year 5: 15 Sep 2030 through 14 Sep 2031

(b) Task Order Performance:

Individual Task Orders issued during the ordering period shall specify their own period of performance. Task Orders may be issued at any time during the active ordering period.

(c) Option to Extend Services:

The Government may require continued performance of any services within the limits and at the rates specified in the contract. The Contracting Officer may exercise this option by written notice to the Contractor within 30 days of contract expiration (refer to FAR 52.217-8). The ordering extended period is structured as follows:

Extended Ordering Period: 15 Sep 2031 through 14 Mar 2032

[End of F 2.0 PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE AND ORDERING PERIOD (IDIQ)]

List of Contract Documents, Exhibits, or Attachments

Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified to:

J 1.0 - LIST OF ATTACHMENTS

(a) The following documents are attached to the solicitation.

- Solicitation Atch (A) Price Quotation Sheet (20260804)

- Solicitation Atch (B) Technical Information Sheet (20260804)

- Solicitation Atch (C) Contract Data Sheet

- Solicitation Atch (D) Financial Data Sheet

- Solicitation Atch (E) Subcontractor Information

- Solicitation Atch (F) Determination of Responsibility Questionnaires

(b) The following documents are attached to the solicitation and the resulting contract.

- Performance Work Statement (PWS) ( )20260813

- Pricing Sheet (provided upon award)

- PWS Atch (1) Environmental Protection Plan (EPP) Template

- PWS Atch (2) CFAS Environmental Policy Statement

- PWS Atch (3) Environmental Management System Awareness Training (EMSAT) Instruction

- PWS Atch (4) List of the Govt Point of Contact (POC) (provided upon award)

- PWS Atch (5) Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP)

- PWS Atch (6) NIST SP 800-171 Compliance (20260804)

[End of J 1.0 LIST OF ATTACHMENTS]

Addendum to 52.212-1, Instructions to Offerors - Commercial Products and Commercial Services

Miscellaneous text in this section has been modified to:

L 1.0 - ADDENDUM TO PROVISION

a. Addendum to FAR Provision, 52.204-7 System for Award Management (Oct 2018) In conjunction with paragraph (c) of this provision, Japanese offeror need to obtain Unique Entity Identifier (UEI). Currently UEI may be obtained as DUNS number from;

Tokyo Shoko Research Ltd.

D&B Business Promotion Tel: 03-3574-2258 / Fax: 03-3574-2292

b. Addendum to FAR Provision, 52.212-1 Instructions to Offerors - Commercial Products and Commercial Services (Sep 2023)

Notwithstanding paragraph (a), entitled "Submission of offers" is amended by adding the following;

(7) Vendor/Offeror shall submit required document(s) specified in (8) below in one of four ways by the time and date specified in Block 8:

Note: To a maximum extent, submit quotation/offer by (i) Email for saving time, paper resources, and paperwork reduction.

(i) E-mail: Send to Contracting POC.

(ii) Facsimile: 0956-50-3282 (call the Contracting POC before faxing);

(iii) Hand delivery to the local address provided below contact information; or

(iv) By mailing to the local address provided below contact information.

NAVSUP Fleet Logistics Center Yokosuka Site Sasebo Sasebo Contracts Division (Code 242), Building #480 3rd floor Sasebo U.S. Naval Base Mubanchi Tategami-cho, Sasebo City, Nagasaki, Japan 857-0063

Contracting POC: See block 9 at the 1st page

(8) Document(s) to be submitted:

(i) SF 1449 for Solicitation No. N6824626QE025

- Fill in block 30 a.b.c (Signature, Name and Title of signer and Date signed).

- Submit in English language.

- Include any discount terms, if any.

(ii) If you are contractor outside of Japan, submit required document(s) stated in Section M 1.0.

(iii) Solicitation Atch (A) Price Quotation Sheet

(iv) Licenses, permissions, and/or authorizations to accomplish the requirement. Translate in English.

(v) Solicitation Atch (B) Technical Information Sheet.

(vi) Equipment List for barge and truck. The below table is provided as an example. At a minimum, the following information shall be included:

Barge/Truck Name Type Holding Capacity (Gallon)

ABC-1 Treatment Barge 800,000

DEF-1 Collection Barge 300,000

DEF-2 Collection Barge 300,000

LMN-1 Collection Barge 200,000

LMN-2 Collection Barge 200,000

OPQ-1 Collection Barge 150,000

OPQ-2 Collection Barge 150,000

XYZ-1 Vacuum Truck 2,400

TOTAL 2,102,400

(vii) PWS Atch (1) Environmental Protection Plan (EPP)

(viii) Solicitation Atch (C) Contract Data Sheets for Past Performance Information (see FAR 52.212-2)

(ix) Solicitation Atch (D) Financial Data Sheet. Fill in the sheet using the latest information. Submit one (1) copy of Balance Sheet and Profit & Loss Statement for the same fiscal year.

(x) Solicitation Atch (E) Subcontractors Information, if apply. (Note: Vendors are reminded of the requirements associated with subcontracting with contractors that are debarred, suspended or proposed for debarment contained at FAR 52.209-6. As with all FAR requirements, please ensure you are familiar with those requirements prior to submitting your quotation.)

(xi) Solicitation Atch (F) Determination of Responsibility Questionnaires

(xii) The Offeror's specific CAGE Code(s) that will be used to perform the contract and process Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI).

(9) Submit all questions via email to the Contracting POC no later than 10:00 a.m. on (JST). Submissions may be in English or a 19 Aug 2026 combination of Japanese and English. All questions and answers will be shared with all vendors. Note: If your physical address in System Award Management (SAM) is located outside Japan, you are required to submit one of the certificates stated in Section M 1.0 with questions. Questions without the certification might not be answered.

[End of L 1.0 ADDENDUM TO PROVISION]

L 2.0 HISTORICAL OWW WORKLOAD

The Government provides the following information to facilitate the preparation of a competitive quotation.

Metric Dec 2023 - Nov 2024 Dec 2024 - Nov 2025 Nov 2025 - May 2026

Total OWW Collected (gallon) 1,089,140 1,383,178 360,879

Maximum Gallons per Month 233,125 259,455 188,562

Number of Barge Service 1,161 1,013 478

Number of Hose & Fitting 35 30 19

Number of Truck Service 22 35 9

Number of PFAS Test 9 21 9

The historical workload data provided above represents the Government's best estimate of recurring services based on historical averages. These figures are for information purposes only and do not guarantee minimum or maximum workload levels under the resulting contract.

[End of L 2.0 HISTORICAL OWW WORKLOAD]

Evaluation - Commercial Products and Commercial Services

Additional Information/Notes

The following clauses were added:

FAR Clauses Incorporated by Full Text

52.212-2 Evaluation-Commercial Products and Commercial Services. (Deviation 2026-O0038) (Jan 2026)

Evaluation-Commercial Products and Commercial Services (Feb 2026) (Deviation 2026-O0038)

(a) Evaluation factors. The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible Offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors will be used to evaluate offers:

Award will be made to the responsible vendor whose quotation is technically acceptable, has acceptable past performance, and offers the lowest total price, in accordance with the terms of the solicitation. Evaluation summary and processes are as follows:

Source Selection Summary:

P a r a

Phase Evaluator Action / Standard

A Respons ibility

Contract Specialist & Contracting Officer Affirmative determination per FAR 9.104-1.

B Price Contract Specialist & Contracting Officer

Rank quotes. Select the lowest total price for technical evaluation. Assess for unbalancing.

C Technical Govt Technical Evaluation Team

Rated strictly Acceptable or Unacceptable based on minimum requirements.

D Past Perfo rmance

Customer Technical Representative

Rated Acceptable or Unacceptable (Recency within 3 years, Relevancy, Quality).

Note: Unknown/Neutral is rated as Acceptable.

Note: The Government reserves the right to ask vendors to clarify their quotes or to enter into negotiations if the Contracting Officer determines that clarifications or negotiations are in the best interest of the Government.

A. Determination of Responsibility

The Contract Specialist performs a responsibility determination on the quoted vendor. FAR Part 9.103(a) states that award contracts to responsible prospective contractors only. FAR Part 9.103(b) stipulates that no purchase or award shall be made unless the Contracting Officer makes an affirmative determination of responsibility. In making a responsibility determination, the standards at FAR 9.104-1 will be considered. The Contracting Officer reserves the right to request adequate evidence of responsibility on the part of the vendor or any quoted subcontractor;

communications with vendor regarding responsibility issues may take place at any time during the evaluation process.

The quotation submitted by the responsible vendor is evaluated price factor at Para B.

Note 1 (Revised): The Government will evaluate the Offeror's compliance with DFARS 252.204-7012, DFARS 252.204-7019, and NIST SP 800-171 on an acceptable/unacceptable (Go/No-Go) basis.

A prospective vendor must have a current (not older than three years) NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessment score posted in the Supplier Performance Risk System (SPRS) at the time the Government is prepared to make an award.

To be considered eligible for award, the vendor must have a qualifying score posted in SPRS prior to contract award. A vendor that does not have an active SPRS score posted at the time of the award decision, or has a score that does not cover the relevant CAGE code(s) for the facilities performing the CUI-related work, will be rated 'No-Go' and will be ineligible for award.

A contractor does not need a perfect score of 110 to be awarded the contract. They can have a lower score (even a negative score, as the scale ranges from -203 to +110) as long as they have a documented Plan of Action and Milestones (POA&M) in place to address the missing controls.

ditionally, the Contracting Officer will make formal affirmative determination of responsibility for the apparent successful vendor prior to Note 2: Ad contract award in accordance with FAR 9.103 and 9.104.

B. Evaluation of Price In accordance with FAR 52.212-2, (Evaluation-Commercial Products and Commercial Services), paragraph (b) Options, the Government will evaluate quotations for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. The "total price" refers to the amount specified in the Solicitation Atch (A) Price Quotation Sheet. The Contract Specialist conducts price analysis to evaluate quoted price in response to the solicitation. The Government may determine that a quote is unreasonable, if the price is significantly unbalanced. The Contract Specialist selects the lowest priced quotation. The responsible vendor who submits the lowest total priced quotation is evaluated technical factor at Para C.

C. Evaluation of Technical Quotation The purpose of the technical evaluation is to assess whether the vendor's technical quotation will satisfy the Government's minimum requirements.

The Government Technical Evaluation Team evaluates the technical package provided by the responsible vendor who submits the lowest priced quotation to ensure the technical information is sufficient to meet the requirements.

The technical factor is evaluated and rated "Acceptable" or "Unacceptable" basis as follows:

Rating: Rating Description Acceptable: Quotation meets the requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable: Quotation does not meet the requirements of the solicitation.

In order to meet the requirements of the solicitation, an "Acceptable" technical factor must include / demonstrate the following:

a. Possession of all required valid license(s), permission(s), and/or authorization(s) to accomplish the requirement, such as transportation and treatment of OWW, recycling used oil, and disposal of industrial waste.

b. Number of Equipment owned. Following equipment/capability is the Government's minimum request (service) per day. The contractor shall provide the service, once the Government orders and schedules.

i. Accept at least 50,000 gallons of OWW per job per day.

ii. At least a total of 2,000,000 gallons OWW holding capacity.

iii. At least seven (7) OWW treatment and collection barges (treatment barge is able to treat OWW 15,000 gallons or higher per hour) are required. Each barge must have at a minimum 50,000 gallons of capacity to hold OWW (smaller barge may be acceptable).

iv. One (1) OWW vacuum truck shall have 2,400 gallons (10 ton) of capacity to hold OWW.

c. Use of DoD Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (ELAP) accredited laboratory for testing.

d. Acceptable Environmental Protection Plan (EPP)

The vendor who receives a rating of "Acceptable" technical factor is evaluated past performance factor at Para D. A vendor who receives a rating of "Unacceptable" technical will be eliminated from further consideration for award, and the Government will proceed to evaluate the quotation submitted by the vendor who provided the next lowest-priced quotation.

D. Evaluation of Past Performance The purpose of the past performance evaluation is an assessment of the vendor's probability of meeting the minimum past performance solicitation requirements. The customer technical representative evaluates past performance which is submitted by the responsible vendor who submitted the lowest priced technically acceptable quotation to ensure the past performance is sufficient to meet the requirements.

The past performance factor is evaluated and rated "Acceptable" or "Unacceptable" basis as follows:

Ratings Rating Description Acceptable Based on the Vendor's performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the Vendor will successfully perform the required effort.

Unacceptable Based on the Vendor's performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the Vendor will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

In order to meet the requirements of the solicitation, an 'Acceptable' past performance factor must include / demonstrate the following:

a. Recency: Proposed past performance shall be for work completed within three (3) years from the date the solicitation was issued.

b. Relevancy: Proposed past performance shall be for work that is same or similar services as described in the PWS for this solicitation. The proposed past performance may be for work provided to the general public, the U.S. Government, and/or the Government of Japan.

c. Quality of Performance: The past performance evaluation team review CPARS evaluations, responses to questionnaires sent to the vendor's customers, and any other source of past performance available to the Government evaluators.

The evaluation will consider the following areas.

Quality of services Determine if the vendor has complied with contract requirements in terms of standards of good workmanship and services.

Timeliness of performance Determine if the vendor has complied with contract performance.

Customer satisfaction Determine if the vendor has satisfied its clients and provided general businesslike concern.

Note: In the case of a vendor without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the vendor may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305 (a)(2)(iv)). Therefore, the vendor shall be determined to have unknown (or "neutral") past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, a neutral rating shall be considered "acceptable."

The vendor who receives a rating of "Acceptable" past performance factor is eligible to be selected as the awardee. A vendor who receives a rating of "Unacceptable" past performance will be eliminated from further consideration for award, and the Government will proceed to evaluate the quotation submitted by a responsible vendor who submitted the next lowest priced technically acceptable quotation.

(b) . The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic Options requirement. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. The evaluation of options does not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

(c) . A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer furnished to the successful Offeror within the time for acceptance specified in Notice of award the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer's specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

(End of provision)

The following clauses were deleted:

FAR Clauses Incorporated by Full Text

52.212-2 Evaluation-Commercial Products and Commercial Services. (Deviation 2026-O0038) (Jan 2026)

Evaluation-Commercial Products and Commercial Services (Feb 2026) (Deviation 2026-O0038)

(a) Evaluation factors. The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible Offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors will be used to evaluate offers:

Award will be made to the responsible vendor whose quotation is technically acceptable, has acceptable past performance, and offers the lowest total price, in accordance with the terms of the solicitation. Evaluation summary and processes are as follows:

Source Selection Summary:

P a r a

Phase Evaluator Action / Standard

A Respons ibility

Contract Specialist & Contracting Officer Affirmative determination per FAR 9.104-1.

B Price Contract Specialist & Contracting Officer

Rank quotes. Select the lowest total price for technical evaluation. Assess for unbalancing.

C Technical Govt Technical Evaluation Team

Rated strictly Acceptable or Unacceptable based on minimum requirements.

D Past Perfo rmance

Customer Technical Representative

Rated Acceptable or Unacceptable (Recency within 3 years, Relevancy, Quality).

Note: Unknown/Neutral is rated as Acceptable.

Note: The Government reserves the right to ask vendors to clarify their quotes or to enter into negotiations if the Contracting Officer determines that clarifications or negotiations are in the best interest of the Government.

A. Determination of Responsibility

The Contract Specialist performs a responsibility determination on the quoted vendor. FAR Part 9.103(a) states that award contracts to responsible prospective contractors only. FAR Part 9.103(b) stipulates that no purchase or award shall be made unless the Contracting Officer makes an affirmative determination of responsibility. In making a responsibility determination, the standards at FAR 9.104-1 will be considered. The Contracting Officer reserves the right to request adequate evidence of responsibility on the part of the vendor or any quoted subcontractor;

communications with vendor regarding responsibility issues may take place at any time during the evaluation process.

The quotation submitted by the responsible vendor is evaluated price factor at Para B.

Note 1: The Government will evaluate the Offeror's compliance with DFARS 252.204-7012 and NIST SP 800-171 on an acceptable/unacceptable (Go /No-Go) basis. To receive a 'Go' rating, the Offeror must demonstrate that they have a current (not older than three years) NIST SP 800-171 DoD Assessment score posted in the Supplier Performance Risk System (SPRS) prior to the closing date of this solicitation. An Offeror without an active SPRS score, or a score that does not cover the relevant CAGE codes for the facilities performing the work, will be rated 'No-Go' and become ineligible for award.

Go/No-Go criteria to require: An active SPRS entry (Basic Assessment or higher).

: Additionally, the Contracting Officer will make formal affirmative determination of responsibility for the apparent successful vendor prior to Note 2 contract award in accordance with FAR 9.103 and 9.104.

B. Evaluation of Price In accordance with FAR 52.212-2, (Evaluation-Commercial Products and Commercial Services), paragraph (b) Options, the Government will evaluate quotations for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement. The "total price" refers to the amount specified in the Solicitation Atch (A) Price Quotation Sheet. The Contract Specialist conducts price analysis to evaluate quoted price in response to the solicitation. The Government may determine that a quote is unreasonable, if the price is significantly unbalanced. The Contract Specialist selects the lowest priced quotation. The responsible vendor who submits the lowest total priced quotation is evaluated technical factor at Para C.

C. Evaluation of Technical Quotation The purpose of the technical evaluation is to assess whether the vendor's technical quotation will satisfy the Government's minimum requirements.

The Government Technical Evaluation Team evaluates the technical package provided by the responsible vendor who submits the lowest priced quotation to ensure the technical information is sufficient to meet the requirements.

The technical factor is evaluated and rated "Acceptable" or "Unacceptable" basis as follows:

Rating: Rating Description Acceptable: Quotation meets the requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable: Quotation does not meet the requirements of the solicitation.

In order to meet the requirements of the solicitation, an "Acceptable" technical factor must include / demonstrate the following:

a. Possession of all required valid license(s), permission(s), and/or authorization(s) to accomplish the requirement, such as transportation and treatment of OWW, recycling used oil, and disposal of industrial waste.

b. Number of Equipment owned. Following equipment/capability is the Government's minimum request (service) per day. The contractor shall provide the service, once the Government orders and schedules.

i. Accept at least 50,000 gallons of OWW per job per day.

ii. At least a total of 2,000,000 gallons OWW holding capacity.

iii. At least seven (7) OWW treatment and collection barges (treatment barge is able to treat OWW 15,000 gallons or higher per hour) are required. Each barge must have at a minimum 50,000 gallons of capacity to hold OWW (smaller barge may be acceptable).

iv. One (1) OWW vacuum truck shall have 2,400 gallons (10 ton) of capacity to hold OWW.

c. Use of DoD Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Program (ELAP) accredited laboratory for testing.

d. Acceptable Environmental Protection Plan (EPP)

The vendor who receives a rating of "Acceptable" technical factor is evaluated past performance factor at Para D. A vendor who receives a rating of "Unacceptable" technical will be eliminated from further consideration for award, and the Government will proceed to evaluate the quotation submitted by the vendor who provided the next lowest-priced quotation.

D. Evaluation of Past Performance The purpose of the past performance evaluation is an assessment of the vendor's probability of meeting the minimum past performance solicitation requirements. The customer technical representative evaluates past performance which is submitted by the responsible vendor who submitted the lowest priced technically acceptable quotation to ensure the past performance is sufficient to meet the requirements.

The past performance factor is evaluated and rated "Acceptable" or "Unacceptable" basis as follows:

Ratings Rating Description Acceptable Based on the Vendor's performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the Vendor will successfully perform the required effort.

Unacceptable Based on the Vendor's performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the Vendor will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

In order to meet the requirements of the solicitation, an 'Acceptable' past performance factor must include / demonstrate the following:

a. Recency: Proposed past performance shall be for work completed within three (3) years from the date the solicitation was issued.

b. Relevancy: Proposed past performance shall be for work that is same or similar services as described in the PWS for this solicitation. The proposed past performance may be for work provided to the general public, the U.S. Government, and/or the Government of Japan.

c. Quality of Performance: The past performance evaluation team review CPARS evaluations, responses to questionnaires sent to the vendor's customers, and any other source of past performance available to the Government evaluators.

The evaluation will consider the following areas.

Quality of services Determine if the vendor has complied with contract requirements in terms of standards of good workmanship and services.

Timeliness of performance Determine if the vendor has complied with contract performance.

Customer satisfaction Determine if the vendor has satisfied its clients and provided general businesslike concern.

Note: In the case of a vendor without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the vendor may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305 (a)(2)(iv)). Therefore, the vendor shall be determined to have unknown (or "neutral") past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, a neutral rating shall be considered "acceptable."

The vendor who receives a rating of "Acceptable" past performance factor is eligible to be selected as the awardee. A vendor who receives a rating of "Unacceptable" past performance will be eliminated from further consideration for award, and the Government will proceed to evaluate the quotation submitted by a responsible vendor who submitted the next lowest priced technically acceptable quotation.

(b) . The Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic Options requirement. The Government may determine that an offer is unacceptable if the option prices are significantly unbalanced. The evaluation of options does not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

(c) . A written notice of award or acceptance of an offer furnished to the successful Offeror within the time for acceptance specified in Notice of award the offer, shall result in a binding contract without further action by either party. Before the offer's specified expiration time, the Government may accept an offer (or part of an offer), whether or not there are negotiations after its receipt, unless a written notice of withdrawal is received before award.

(End of provision)

PSC 473 BOX 11, FPO AP 96349-1500

FPO, AP 96349-1500

UNITED STATES

Yasuhiko Motooka, Email: yasuhiko.motooka3.ln@us.navy.mil Telephone: 0956-50-6827 AdminBy:

SCD: PAS: