3. V-22 Pre Sol Conf FLCY PCO Pres.pdf

PDF 2 MB Posted

Attached to
J015 Maintenance and Repair Service for V-22 Aircraft
Solicitation number
N6264920R0032
Issued by

About this file

This document provides information for a pre-solicitation conference regarding a solicitation for maintenance and repair services for V-22 aircraft. Interested parties are asked to register for the conference no later than February 11, 2020 by providing names of up to five attendees to the contracting officer. The conference will be held on March 3, 2020 at Naval Air Facility Atsugi and will allow parties to provide feedback on draft solicitation documents and ask questions. Attendees must have proper documentation for base access and non-Japanese nationals will need a valid passport. Vendors are responsible for their own lodging and food during the event. The solicitation will be for an indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity multiple award contract for scheduled and unscheduled depot-level maintenance and repair services for V-22 aircraft for a period of up to 9.5 years. The incumbent contractor is Subaru Corporation. Pricing will be firm-fixed-price. Task orders will be competed based on lowest evaluated price considering past performance evaluation ratings for quality and schedule.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
V-22 ATTACH 07 GFP LIST DRAFT.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
V-22 ATTACH 01 PWS (2020-04-02).docx DOCX document
N626492R0032 DRAFT RFP v2.docx DOCX document
N626492R0032 DRAFT RFP v2.docx DOCX document
QandA 4.17.20.docx DOCX document
V-22 PreSol Conference Additional QA 3.16.pdf PDF
V-22 Pre Solic Conf QAs FINAL v2 (2020-03-09).pdf PDF
1. V-22 Pre Solic Conf FRCWP Sched.pdf PDF
V-22 Pre Solic Conf QAs FINAL.pdf PDF
4. DCMA Command Brief V-22.pdf PDF
2. V-22 PSC FRCWP Cmd Brief.pdf PDF
CDRL C002 PRESENTATION DOCUMENTATION V-22.pdf PDF
CDRL A009 EXAMINER & EVALUATOR DISCREPANCY REPORT V-22.pdf PDF
CDRL B004 EXCESS MATERIAL REPORT V-22.pdf PDF
V-22 ATTACH 12 Projected Induction Schedule DRAFT.docx DOCX document
CDRL A002 TECHNICAL DIRECTIVES REPORT V-22.pdf PDF
CDRL L001 TECHNICAL DATA INVENTORY LISTING V-22.pdf PDF
CDRL B011 SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (SE) MAINTENANCE AND CALIBRATION REPORT V-22.pdf PDF
CDRL D004 TRAINING PLAN_V-22.pdf PDF
V-22 ATTACH 02 GOV REL.docx DOCX document
CDRL A008 SITUATION SUMMARY REPORT V-22.pdf PDF
CDRL A011 WEIGHT AND BALANCE REPORTS V-22.pdf PDF
CDRL A016 PMI MAN-HOURS per MATERIAL COST REPORT V-22.pdf PDF
CDRL B009 DAILY REQUISITION REPORT (DRR) V-22.pdf PDF
V-22 ATTACH 05 Repairable Items DRAFT.docx DOCX document
CDRL B008 ACTIVE ITEM REPORT V-22.pdf PDF
CDRL C001 MEETING MINUTES V-22.pdf PDF
CDRL A006 NOTIFICATION OF AIRCRAFT DELAY V-22.pdf PDF
CDRL B002 AIRCRAFT AWAITING PARTS REPORT (AWP) V-22.pdf PDF
V-22 ATTACH 01 PWS DRAFT.docx DOCX document
CDRL A001 TECHNICAL DIRECTIVES REQUIREMENTS 10 DAY REPORT V-22.pdf PDF
CDRL A007 SCHEDULED REMOVAL CARDS V-22.pdf PDF
CDRL A013 NON-DESTRUCTIVE INSPECTION (NDI) REPORT V-22.pdf PDF
CDRL B005 ANNUAL PHYSICAL INVENTORY V-22.pdf PDF
CDRL B003 FINAL MATERIAL CONSUMPTION REPORT V-22.pdf PDF
V-22 ATTACH 14_Price_Summary_Spreadsheet DRAFT.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
CDRL A014 NOTED AND CORRECTED (NAC) REPORT V-22.pdf PDF
V-22 ATTACH 11 Airfield Requirements DRAFT.docx DOCX document
CDRL D003 TRANSITION INVENTORY PLAN (SHUT-DOWN) V-22.pdf PDF
CDRL A012 Maintenance History Summary (MHS) Report V-22.pdf PDF
CDRL D002 TRANSITION STATUS REPORT V-22.pdf PDF
CDRL A004 DISCREPANT PART ON INDUCTION REPORT V-22.pdf PDF
V-22 ATTACH 08 TEI Process DRAFT.docx DOCX document
CDRL B010 SUPPORT EQUIPMENT (SE) MAINTENANCE HISTORY RECORD REPORT V-22.pdf PDF
CDRL A001 TECHNICAL DIRECTIVES REPORT 10 DAY REPORT Sample Format.docx DOCX document
CDRL B007 RECEIPT REPORT V-22.pdf PDF
CDRL F001 INTEGRATED MASTER SCHEDULE V-22.pdf PDF
V-22 ATTACH 10 Maintenance Facility Req DRAFT.docx DOCX document
CDRL B006 SUPPLY EFFECTIVENESS REPORT V-22.pdf PDF
V-22 ATTACH 03 QASP DRAFT.docx DOCX document
Show 40 more

Latest 50 of 68 listed here. See the rest on GovTribe.

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

READY. RESOURCEFUL. RESPONSIVE.

Procuring Contracting Officer

Presented to:

Industry

Presented by:

Vanessa Schwaner

PCO

3/3/2020

Note: In the case of a conflict between these slides and the solicitation, the solicitation will take precedence.

NAVSUP is a Fleet-Focused Organization with Global Reach

Yokosuka

Jacksonville

Norfolk/VA. Beach

Puget Sound

San Diego

Mechanicsburg

USPACOM

NAVSUP

Weapon Systems Support

(WSS)

NAVSUP

Fleet Logistics Centers

(FLC)

NAVSUP

Business Systems Center

(BSC)

Navy Exchange Service Command

(NEXCOM)

Naval Supply Systems Command

Pearl Harbor

USSOUTHCOM

USPACOM

USEUCOM

USAFRICOM

Philadelphia

Sigonella

Bahrain

USCENTCOM

USNORTHCOM

NAVSUP Enterprise

• Proposal Volumes

• 1 – Executive Summary

• 2 – Past Performance

• 3 – Combined Technical/Technical Risk

• 4 – Price

• Page Limitations

Section L Overview

Volume Section Title Page Limitations

(1) 1.0 Executive Summary

1.1 Offer Letter 2 page limit

1.2 Completed Section K No page limit

1.3 Business Systems Status No page limit

1.4 Company Financial Profile No page limit

(2) 2.0 Past Performance Proposal 15 page limit per contract reference

(3) 3.0 Combined Technical/Technical Risk Proposal

3.1 Technical Performance at Contractor Facility 55 page limit

3.2 Program Management at Contractor Facility 45 page limit

(4) 4.0 Price Proposal No page limit

Source Selection Approach (Best Value):

Tradeoff Process NOT Lowest Price Technically Acceptable (LPTA)

Evaluation Criteria:

Past Performance > Technical Risk > Price

Potential ordering period:

Up to 9.5 Years (5 base years, plus 4 one-year option periods, plus 6 month extension)

Anticipated Solicitation Release:

Mid-to late Spring with 60 day response window

Acquisition Strategy

Incumbent Contractor is Subaru Corporation

Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP), Indefinite-Delivery Indefinite-Quantity (IDIQ)

Scheduled Depot-Level Maintenance and Repair Services

Unscheduled Maintenance and Repair Services -Over & Above -In-Service Repair (ISR) -Customer Service Request (CSR) -Aircraft Modifications

Multiple Award Contract (IDIQ)

At least two awardees

PMI Task orders competed by price and performance thereafter.

Task Orders for unscheduled maintenance awarded based on lowest evaluated price.

Multiple Award Contract (IDIQ)

Stage 1 The Government will first evaluate the Past Performance of all Offerors. Only Offerors with Past Performance assessed as either “Substantial Confidence” or “Satisfactory Confidence” (including those offerors who are rated as having “Neutral Confidence) will be evaluated for Combined Technical/Technical Risk.

Stage 2 The Government will then evaluate the remaining Offerors’ written technical proposals for the offeror’s technical understanding of the requirements and assess Combined Technical/Technical Risk. Only Offerors with assigned Combined Technical/Technical Risk Rating of either “Acceptable,” “Good” or “Outstanding” will be considered for a MAC award.

Stage 3 Offerors whose proposals are still being considered for award will then be evaluated for price.

Evaluation Criteria – 3 Stages

Anticipated Workload

Fiscal Year Scheduled Inductions

Fiscal Year Scheduled Inductions

2021 4 2026 5 2022 4 2027 5 2023 5 2028 6 2024 6 2029 5 2025 5 2030 6

The Government is under no obligation to evaluate Offeror’s Past Performance that is not backed by a fully completed and properly submitted Past Performance Questionnaire.

Past Performance Questionnaires must be completed in their entirety and are submitted directly from the Offeror's customer to the FLCY PCO.

The Government may obtain and evaluate additional Past Performance Data, including contracts not identified in the Offeror’s proposal.

Past Performance

Unless otherwise specified in this PWS, the Contractor shall provide all common tools and equipment (including personal protective equipment (PPE) and confined space detection equipment) necessary for performing these services.

Government furnished equipment (GFE) will be provided for Contractor use and, with the occasional exception of Contractor provided equipment and material, the Government will supply the material for this work.

Contractor Support Equipment

The Government will provide full supply support.

The Government may request the Contractor to augment their supply chain in special cases.

Procedures for processing 7R and 3B(D) repairable items will be developed after contract award and according to the Contractor’s location.

Supply Support

Adequate Price Competition (FAR 15.403-1(c)).

Price Analysis based on Comparison of Offers (FAR 15.401-1(b)(2)(i)).

Only One Offer Received (DFARS 215.371)

Certified Cost or Pricing Data (DFARS 215.371-3(b)(2))

DCMA Field Pricing Assistance (DFARS PGI 215.404-2(a))

DCAA Audit Assistance (DFARS PGI 215.404-2(c))

Price Evaluation

Price analysis will be conducted on the total evaluated price, including all options. For evaluation purposes, the price for the Option to Extend Services Clause 52.217-8 will be calculated as 50% of the offeror’s proposed price for the last option year (Option Year 4).

Each Offeror’s total price shall be evaluated to ensure that it is fair and reasonable. The Government intends to make a determination of fair and reasonable price on the basis of adequate price competition. However, in accordance with FAR 15.404-1, the Government may use any of the analytical techniques in that section either singly or in combination with each other to determine that the final price is fair and reasonable. Award will not be made to an Offeror whose price is determined to be other than fair and reasonable.

Although price is the not the most important evaluation factor, it has the potential to become more significant during the evaluation process. The degree of importance of price will increase with the degree of equality of the proposals in relation to the other factors on which selection is to be based. The importance of price will also increase when a proposal's price is so significantly high as to diminish the value to the Government that might be gained under the other aspects of the offer.

Price Evaluation

The MAC task order competition strategy applies to scheduled maintenance PMI inductions and all unscheduled maintenance activities (e.g. Technical Directives, In Service Repairs, Customer Service Requests, etc.). Task orders will be competed amongst all MAC holders following the fair opportunity guidance at FAR 16.505(b)(1).

Any exceptions to fair opportunity will be in accordance with FAR 16.505(b)(2).

Task orders will be awarded to Mac holder with the lowest evaluated price.

Evaluated prices will be determined using the formula:

(Proposed Price) X (Quality Weighting Factor) X (Schedule Weighting Factor) = Evaluated Price

Task Order Competition

Table 1 – Past Performance Quality Sub-factor Weighting Scheme Quality Sub-factor Measure Quality Weighting Factor If there is no MAC PMI delivery, quality weighting will be neutral.

N/A 1.0

If there is no Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) Quality rating for either of the 2 most recent 12-month periods, quality weighting will be neutral.

N/A 1.0

Number of accepted critical, major, and minor deficiencies documented in Aircraft Acceptance Inspection Deficiency Report (AIDR) for most recent MAC PMI delivery.

0 0.9

Number of accepted minor deficiencies documented in AIDR for most recent MAC PMI delivery.

1 – 10 1.3

Number of accepted minor deficiencies documented in AIDR for most recent MAC PMI delivery.

Greater than 10 1.5

Number of accepted critical or major deficiencies documented in AIDR for most recent MAC PMI delivery.

Greater than 0 1.7

MAC CPARS Quality rating for either of the 2 most recent 12-month periods.

Marginal or Unsatisfactory 2.0

The Past Performance Weighting Factor is comprised of two (2) sub-factors, Quality and Schedule. The weighting scheme for each sub-factor is as follows. If a MAC holder meets two or more quality sub-factor measures, the highest quality weighting factor met will be used in the formula. If a MAC holder meets two or more schedule sub-factor measures, the highest schedule weighting factor met will be used in the formula.

Table 2 – Past Performance Schedule Sub-factor Weighting Scheme Schedule Sub-factor Measure Schedule Weighting Factor If there is no MAC PMI delivery, schedule weighting will be neutral.

N/A 1.0

If there is no Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) Schedule rating for either of the 2 most recent 12-month periods, schedule weighting will be neutral.

N/A 1.0

Total contract Turn Around Time (TAT) less Government delays as determined by the DCMA ACO meets objective TAT for most recent MAC PMI delivery.

365 days and less 0.75

Total contract TAT less Government delays as determined by the DCMA ACO is 0-24% below threshold TAT for most recent MAC PMI delivery.

481-364 days 0.9

Total contract TAT less Government delays as determined by the DCMA ACO meets threshold TAT for most recent MAC PMI delivery.

482 days 1.0

Total contract TAT less Government delays as determined by the DCMA ACO is 0-20% over threshold TAT for most recent MAC PMI delivery.

483-578 days 1.2

Total contract TAT less Government delays as determined by the DCMA ACO is greater than 20% over threshold TAT for most recent MAC PMI delivery.

579 days and over 1.5

MAC CPARS Schedule rating for either of the 2 most recent 12-month periods.

Marginal or Unsatisfactory 2.0

If a MAC holder meets two or more measures, the highest schedule weighting factor met will be used in the formula.

The basis for Award of each MAC Task Order will be Lowest Evaluated Price.

The Government reserves the right to award task orders based factors that will yield the required result. These factors will be determined on a case-by-case basis and documented in the request for quote for the task order.

Vanessa Schwaner (PCO) Email: Vanessa.Schwaner@fe.navy.mil Phone: 046-816-6292

William Koeditz (Division Director) Email: William.Koeditz@fe.navy.mil Phone: 046-816-8412

Seiji Yoshino Email: Seiji.Yoshino.ja@fe.navy.mil Phone: 046-816-7861

FLCY Points of Contact

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .