N6247025R9003 Amend 0007 Block 14 SF30 Continuation Pages.pdf
PDF 294 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N6247025R9003
About this file
This document is Amendment 0007 to Solicitation N6247025R9003 for the P720 EDI Missile Magazines project at Naval Station Rota, Spain, issued by the Department of the Navy Naval Facilities Engineering Command. The amendment provides responses to 7 pre-proposal inquiries (PPIs) addressing technical clarifications about the project, including details on permanent stabilization, drawing corrections, site conditions, and project sequencing requirements.
Key clarifications include confirmation that the new recycling facility must be fully completed before demolition activities can begin, all existing equipment and waste will be removed from the facility by others, and specific guidance on drawing notes and technical specifications. The amendment references multiple previous amendments and directs potential bidders to consult specific drawings, sheets, and solicitation documents for additional details. The responses aim to provide bidders with precise technical information to support accurate proposal preparation for this military construction project.
View the file
Other files
Show all 39
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
N6247025R9003
SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE
SUMMARY OF CHANGES
The following have been added by full text:
AMENDMENT 0007
AMENDMENT 0007
The purpose of this amendment is to disseminate the below information.
1. Responses to Pre-Proposal Inquiries are provided below and associated replacement attachment (F)
Drawings are provided via attachment.
2. Attachment H – Site Visit Log is provided via attachment.
Responses to PPIs:
133. Inquiry: We do not know the scope and definition of DFOW PS in Drawings CG?
Question: Please, could you clarify?
Response: The acronyms for DFOW PS are defined as Definable Feature of Work Permanent Stabilization (seeding), respectively; for PS, please refer to E&S Legend on sheet C-001, and for seed mixes, see sheet L-502.
134. Inquiry: We think that the notes of Drawing L109 are wrong.
Question: Could you confirm that?
Response: The notes are correct.
135. Inquiry: There are two different notes#11 in Drawing ES106.
Question: Could you confirm that?
Response: Please see replacement drawing ES106 in Amendment 0007; the notes have been updated accordingly.
136. Inquiry: Steel/aluminum pole length is not indicated neither on drawings nor in the specs, existing poles in the area are 20’.
Question: please, could you clarify?
137. Inquiry: Pole arm dimensions is not indicated, existing poles in the area are direct arm mount type.
Question: please, could you clarify?
138. Inquiry: Optic of the existing led pole mounted fixtures is type IV.
Question: please verify that type II distribution is desired?
Response: Please refer to the lighting type specified in the solicitation.
N6247025R9003
139. Inquiry: Please confirm that cost related with 10-Ton bridge crane, Compressed air system and Pallet racks have to be included in CLIN 1C, for the work related with Ammunition Rework and Overhaul Shop (AROS)?
Response: The bridge crane is not within the scope of work; please submit your proposal in accordance with Solicitation.
140. Inquiry: Please confirm the Cybersecurity requirements for any applicable Facility and/or CLIN.
Response: Please refer to Specifications.
141. Inquiry: There is a conflict between the price schedule 1G, 2 and 3 and drawings CG102 and CG103 which include works site limits for construction greater than the 1.5 meter specified in the schedule of price and also overlapping the 1.5 meters in certain areas.
Can you please clarify this issue and provide new guidance?
Response: Please refer to the response to PPI's #4 and #5 provided in Amendment 0003.
142. Inquiry: During the site visit, it was observed that the existing waste facility contains a significant amount of waste. Please, confirm if this facility will be cleared before start of the demolition works. In case the Contractor is required to clean this facility, please confirm. Is there an estimation of the amounts of waste and characteristics? We observed during the site visit electronic and flammable materials.
Response: All existing equipment and waste will be removed from the facility by others.
143. Inquiry: Please, confirm if the completion of the new recycling facility before starting with the demolition of the existing recycling facility is mandatory. After confirmation, we can plan accordingly.
Response: Yes, the new recycling facility must be fully completed before demolition activities can begin.
144. Inquiry: Please, confirm if it's possible to locate the site offices outside the restricted area. The daily access to the restricted area seems slow and may affect, in the long term, the performance of the personnel.
Response: Please refer to the response to PPI# 130 provided in Amendment 0006.
145. Inquiry: The note 7 of drawing C-001 indicates: ““…that magazine building #3401 and #3400 are constructed prior to magazines buildings #3399 and #3398…”. The buildings #3401 and #3400 correspond to clin 2 and 3 and according to paragraph 2.1.5. of RFP: “…within 365 calendar days after the contract award…”. Regarding the Schedule required in Factor 2 – Technical Solution, it is not possible to start with buildings #3401 and #3400 until they will be accepted, unless the contractor has an estimated date for these options. Please clarify the estimated date or if it is acceptable start with buildings #3399 and #3398.
Response: Please refer to the response to PPI #’s 64, 65, 66, and 127 provided in Amendment 0006.
(End of Summary of Changes)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .