N62470-19-R-5017_Solicitation.pdf

MILCON PROJECTS P-19001, EDI: AIRFIELD UPGRADES - APRON EXPANSION; P-19002, EDI: EXPEDITIONARY BEDDOWN SITE; AND P-19003, EDI: AIRFIELD UPGRADES - DANGEROUS CARGO PAD LOCATED AT KEFLAVIK, ICELAND.

TIME AND DUE DATE FOR PROPOSALS IS LISTED IN BLOCK 13 BELOW & IN SECTION 00100 BIDDING SCHEDULE/INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS

SEE SECTION 00 21 13 INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS FOR BASE ACCESS PROCEDURES FOR DELIVERY OF PROPOSALS

SEE SECTION 00 21 13 INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS FOR SITE VISIT INFORMATION

OFFERORS ARE ADVISED THAT FUNDING MAY NOT BECOME AVAILABLE, IF FUNDS ARE NOT AVAILABLE, NO AWARD WILL BE MADE AS

A RESULT OF THIS SOLICITATION.

OFFERORS WILL NOT BE REIMBURSED FOR ANY EFFORT OR PROPOSAL COSTS RESULTING FROM THIS SOLICITATION.

PHILLIP MATTHEWS 001-757-322-8334

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS

NEGOTIATED

29-Aug-2019

(RFP)

(IFB)

X

CALL:

B. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)

See Item 7

2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID

3. DATE ISSUED

9. FOR INFORMATION A. NAME

SOLICITATION

NSN 7540-01-155-3212 1442-101 STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 4-85)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.236-1(e)

11. The Contractor shall begin performance w ithin _______15 calendar days and complete it w ithin ________895 calendar days after receiving aw ard, X notice to proceed. This performance period is X mandatory, negotiable. (See _________________________

12 A. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?

(If "YES," indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12B.)

X YES NO

13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:

A. Sealed offers in original and __________4 copies to perform the w ork required are due at the place specif ied in Item 8 by ___________ local time ______________30 Sep 2019 (date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers must be publicly opened at that time.

shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time offers are due.

B. An offer guarantee is, X is not required.

C. All of fers are subject to the (1) w ork requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.

D. Offers providing less than _______120 calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due w ill not be considered and w ill be rejected.

SOLICITATION, OFFER,

AND AWARD

(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

1. SOLICITATION NO.

IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.

4. CONTRACT NO.

7. ISSUED BY CODE

NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND

ATLANTIC DIVISION

6506 HAMPTON BLVD

NORFOLK VA 23511

N62470

PAGE OF PAGES

1 OF

CODE

(Title, identifying no., date):

12B. CALENDAR DAYS

02:00 PM (hour)

Sealed envelopes containing offers

5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NO. 6. PROJECT NO.

8. ADDRESS OFFER TO (If Other Than Item 7)

FAX:TEL: TEL: FAX:

N6247019R5017 53

20B. SIGNATURE

(REV. 4-85)STANDARD FORM 1442 BACK

TO SIGN

NSN 7540-01-155-3212

SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD (Continued) (Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

CODE FACILITY CODE

17. The offeror agrees to perform the w ork required at the prices specified below in strict accordance w ith the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in w riting w ithin ________ calendar days after the date offers are due.

the minimum requirements stated in Item 13D. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13D.)

AMOUNTS SEE SCHEDULE OF PRICES

18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.

19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation -- give number and date of each)

AMENDMENT NO.

DATE

20A. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN

OFFER (Type or print)

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:

22. AMOUNT 23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN ITEM

(4 copies unless otherwise specified)

CODE

(Insert any number equal to or greater than

20C. OFFER DATE

25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO

10 U.S.C. 2304(c) 41 U.S.C. 253(c)

CODE27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY:26. ADMINISTERED BY

(Include ZIP Code)14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR 15. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code)

See Item 14

(Include only if different than Item 14)16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS

30B. SIGNATURE

29. AWARD (Contractor is not required to sign this document.)

document and return _______ copies to issuing office.) Contractor agrees Your of f er on this solicitation, is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award con-to f urnish and deliv er all items or perf orm all work, requisitions identif ied summates the contract, which consists of (a) the Gov ernment solicitation and on this f orm and any continuation sheets f or the consideration stated in this y our of f er, and (b) this contract award. No f urther contractual document is contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be necessary .

gov erned by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certif ications, and specif ications or incorporated by ref er-ence in or attached to this contract.

30A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED 31A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

30C. DATE

(Type or print)

TEL: EMAIL:

31B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 31C. AWARD DATE

BY

CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE

(Contractor is required to sign this28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT

(M ust be fully completed by offeror)OFFER

N6247019R5017

Section 00 10 00 - Solicitation

DESCRIPTION OF WORK

This Request for Proposal (RFP) is to design and build MILCON Projects P-19001, EDI: Airfield Upgrades-Apron Expansion; P-19002, EDI: Beddown Site Preparation; and P-19003, EDI: Airfield Upgrades-Dangerous Cargo Pad located in Keflavik, Iceland. These projects will construct an aircraft apron expansion east of the existing hot cargo pad, a dangerous cargo pad with an access taxiway and a gravel beddown site with a utility enclosure.

THIS SOLICITATION WILL BE LIMITED TO U.S. AND ICELANDIC FIRMS ONLY.

P-19001 EDI: Airfield Upgrades - Apron Expansion will construct a full-depth concrete pavement/subbase aircraft parking apron expansion that supports powered on and off operations for a squadron of US Air Force or North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) aerial refueler equivalent aircraft. Mooring eyes and grounding points will be provided and storm water improvements installed as required to meet local environmental regulations. Airfield lighting work includes complete taxiway and apron edge lighting along with visual navigation systems.

P-19002 EDI: Beddown Site Preparation will construct a 40,000 square meter (SM) graveled area consisting of a full depth aggregate base course with crushed stone drainage course enclosed by a perimeter security fence. Electric, communications and water connections will be provided to a centralized connection point on the gravel area. This project will also provide an electrical/communications enclosure to ensure protection of centralized electrical and communications equipment and points of connections. Heating and ventilation will also be provided for this enclosure.

P-19003 EDI: Airfield Upgrades - Dangerous Cargo Pad will construct full-depth concrete pavement/subbase dangerous cargo pad (DCP) with paved asphalt shoulders sized for aircraft up to and including a C-5. A full depth asphalt pavement/subbase taxiway will be provided for access from the primary taxiway to the DCP. The taxiway will be designed for the aircraft to taxi into the DCP under its own power. Airfield lighting work includes complete taxiway and apron edge lighting along with visual navigation systems.

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

Base Price

FFP

MILCON Projects P-19001, EDI: Airfield Upgrades-Apron Expansion; P-19002, EDI: Expeditionary Beddown Site; and P-19003, EDI: Airfield Upgrades- Dangerous Cargo Pad located in Keflavik, Iceland. Price for the entire project work complete, in accordance with the items described in the Request for Proposal

(RFP).

FOB: Destination

NET AMT

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

Option 01

FFP

Option Item 1 for P-19002: Wastewater Containment Tank. Price for the entire design and construction of the Wastewater containment tank and piping system complete in accordance with the RFP, but excluding work described in CLIN 0001.

FOB: Destination

NET AMT

DELIVERY INFORMATION

CLIN DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /

CAGE

0001 N/A N/A N/A N/A

0002 N/A N/A N/A N/A

Section 00 21 13 - Instructions to Bidders

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

List of Attachments

(A) Construction & Design Experience Project Data Sheet

(B) Past Performance Questionnaire

(C) One Day Pass Request Form

(D) Pre Proposal Inquiry (PPI) Form

1. OVERVIEW OF THIS SOURCE SELECTION

This solicitation is being conducted using two (2)-phase design/build procedures in accordance with FAR Part 36.

The best value continuum source selection process used in this acquisition is the tradeoff process. Award will be made to that responsible offeror whose proposal, conforming to the solicitation, is determined to offer the best value to the Government considering the technical and price factors stated herein.

The Government reserves the right to eliminate from consideration any or all offerors at any time prior to award of the contract; to negotiate with offerors in the competitive range; to award the contract to other than the offeror submitting the lowest total price; and to award the contract to the offeror submitting the proposal determined to be the best value.

This acquisition will result in a firm fixed price contract for design/build construction services. In accordance with FAR 36.205the statutory cost limitation for P19001 is $28,024,000 USD. The statutory cost limitation for P19002 is $6,118,400. The statutory cost limitation for P19003 is $15,763,500 USD. Award will be made in U.S. dollars.

THE GOVERNMENT SHALL REJECT AN OFFER IF THE PRICE PROVIDED EXCEEDS THE

APPLICABLE STATUTORY COST LIMITATION AS IDENTIFIED ABOVE. SEE DFARS 252.236-7006

AND THE BID SCHEDULE FOR PROVISIONS REGARDING SEPARATE PRICING FOR EACH ITEM

AND APPLICATION OF THE COST LIMITATION IN THE PRICE EVALUATION.

The contract completion date for this contract is 895 calendar days after notice to proceed. It is expected that all three projects (P-19001, P-19002 and P-19003) would be performed concurrently.

The Government intends to award a contract to a single contractor for CLIN 0001, and CLIN 0002 (if the option is awarded). Offerors must submit a price for each of CLIN 0001, and CLIN 0002. Offerors not submitting pricing for both CLINS will be considered nonresponsive to the solicitation and will not be evaluated.

INTENT TO AWARD WITHOUT DISCUSSIONS: Proposals must set forth full, accurate and complete information as required by this Request for Proposal (including attachments). The penalty for making false statements in proposals is prescribed in 18 U.S.C. 1001. The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award without discussions. Therefore, each initial offer should contain the best terms from a technical, cost and price standpoint. However, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if it is later determined by the Contracting Officer to be necessary.

2. SITE VISITS

A site visit to the Security Zone within Keflavik International Airport, Iceland is not mandatory for this procurement. Offerors will have the opportunity for a site visit during Phase II of the solicitation. Any requests for a site visit during Phase I will not be accommodated. The Phase II site visit information will be provided with the Phase II amendment.

3. ELIGIBILITY FOR AWARD

SYSTEM FOR AWARD MANAGEMENT

NOTE THAT IN ACCORDANCE WITH 10 U.S.C. 2304(C)(4), COMPETITION IS LIMITED TO ICELANDIC

AND U.S. COMPANIES, WHICH MAY ONLY TEAM WITH ICELANDIC AND U.S. COMPANIES AS

SUBCONTRACTORS.

To be eligible for award, your firm(s) must be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) database as required as required by FAR 52.204-7, System for Award Management (Oct 2016).

****Entities registering from outside the United States MUST contact the Federal Service Desk as a part of the registration process. The contact information is available at https://www.fsd.gov/****

Note that the System for Award Management (SAM) is required for all offerors, including Joint Ventures (JV) (registration must state the NAME of the JV). Offerors not currently registered in SAM must obtain a DUN & Bradstreet (DUNS) number and a CAGE or NCAGE prior to registering in SAM.

All offerors, including JV offerors, must submit with their proposal a DUNS number. In addition to the DUNS number required for JV offerors, JV offerors must submit with their proposal a DUNS number for each member comprising the JV. DUNS numbers can be obtained at http://fedgov.dnb.com/webform. The DUNS number is required in order to register in SAM (see above.)

CAGE/NCAGE – A CAGE/NGAGE code is required for all offerors, including JV offerors. JV offerors must acquire a CAGE/NCAGE Code registered in the JV name.

(a)U.S. Offerors, including Joint Venture offerors: U.S. offerors must obtain a CAGE Code prior to registering in the SAM database, part of the SAM registration process (see paragraph above.)

(b) Non-U.S. (foreign) Offerors ONLY, including JV: Non-U.S. offerors must obtain a NATO CAGE (NCAGE) Code instead of a CAGE Code prior to registering in the SAM database. NCAGE codes may be obtained at the NCAGE website https://eportal.nspa.nato.int/AC135Public/scage/CageList.aspx

IMPORTANT NOTICE: If the offeror is registering a new entity in SAM.gov, the offeror must follow new procedures, which include providing an original, signed notarized letter indicating authorized entity Administrator for the entity associated with the DUNS number before a new SAM.gov entity registration will be activated.

IT IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED FOR THE NEW REGISTRANTS TO CHECK WITH SAM.GOV

HELPDESK DIRECTLY TO ENSURE THAT ALL REQUIREMENTS FOR TIMELY REGISTRATION ARE

MET.

4. ENGLISH SPEAKING REPRESENTATIVE

At all times when any performance of the work at the site is being conducted by any employee of the Contractor or his subcontractors, the contractor shall have a representative present on the site capable of explaining the work operations and receiving instructions in the English language. The Contracting Officer shall have the right to determine, without appeal of such decision, whether the proposed representative has sufficient technical and lingual capabilities, and the Contractor shall immediately replace any individual not acceptable to the Contracting Officer.

5. INQUIRIES, PROPOSAL FORMAT AND DUE DATE

All pre-proposal inquiries (PPI) regarding this RFP shall be submitted electronically to Philip Mathews via e-mail at philip.mathews@navy.mil Phone (757) 322-8334, and Vivienne Moore via e-mail at vivienne.moore@navy.mil Phone (757) 322-4221. Offerors are required to use the PPI submittal Form (Attachment D), Responses will be published as an amendment to the solicitation.

The Government does not intend to respond to any PPI submitted less than ten (10) calendar days before the solicitation closing date in order to permit adequate time to reply to the inquiries. There is no guarantee that a PPI submitted after the cutoff date will be answered before the solicitation closes.

Amendments will be posted directly to FEDBIZOPS. Additionally, other postings will be made to FEDBIZOPS, such as the pre-proposal inquires (PPI) log, etc., under the Additional Documents section of the RFP. Postings to the Additional Documents section of FEDBIZOPS DO NOT generate an automated email to contractors. It is recommended contractors check the FEDBIZOPS Additional Documents section of the RFP periodically to see if additional postings have been made. It is the contractor’s responsibility to routinely check FEDBIZOPS for all postings.

The technical specifications and design drawings will be provided with the Phase II Amendment

PHASE I Proposals shall be delivered to:

Commander Naval Facilities Engineering Command Atlantic Building A Mailroom ATTN: ACQ34 Philip Mathews 6506 Hampton Blvd Norfolk, VA 23508-1278

ALL PHASE I SUBMITTALS MUST BE RECEIVED AT THE LOCATION SPECIFIED ABOVE

PRIOR TO 2:00 PM NORFOLK, VA LOCAL TIME, MONDAY, 30 SEPTEMBER 2019. LATE

SUBMITTALS WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED.

Proposal must be clearly marked on the outside of the package with the solicitation number.

ELECTRONIC/FACSIMILE SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED.

Only Phase I Proposals will be considered. The date and time for submission of Phase II proposals is to be determined at a later date. A MAXIMUM NUMBER OF FIVE (5) OFFERORS WILL BE SELECTED TO

SUBMIT PHASE II PROPOSALS.

Price Proposal and Non-Price Factors Proposal - The Price Proposal is submitted in Phase II only. Proposal shall be labeled “PRICE PROPOSAL OR NON-PRICE TECHNICAL FACTORS PROPOSAL FOR RFP N62470-19-R- 5017, NAVFAC ATLANTIC P19001/19002/19003, ICELAND, ATTN: Phil Mathews” All pages shall be numbered and binders shall be appropriately tabbed, conforming to the proposal submittal requirements’ structure for each evaluation factor. Price and Non-Price Factors proposals must be submitted in sealed envelopes/boxes. Any pricing information included in the Non-Price Factors proposal will not be considered. Similarly, any Non-Price information included in the Price Proposal will not be considered.

PHASE I SUBMISSION:

Non-Price Factors: Offeror shall submit one (1), marked “Original,” and four (4) copies marked “Copies,” each in a separate binder, and two (2) electronic copies on CD with the following characteristics:

-8 ½ x 11 format (A4 paper is also acceptable)

- 12 point font, Times New Roman -Two complete electronic copies of the technical proposal factors as a single .pdf searchable file on a CD (include with the “Original” technical submission). If there are any conflicts between hard copies and/or electronic copies, the “Original” hard copy will govern.

-Amendments (SF30s), acknowledged -Include a cover page with Solicitation Number, Solicitation Title, Prime Contractor Name, Address, Phone Number, Fax Number, DUNS, Cage/NCage Code, Point of Contact and their phone and email address.

-The non-price proposal should only include information in response to Factors 1, 2, 3, and JV agreement

(if applicable). Specific page limitations and Solicitation Submittal Requirements are specified in each factor.

PAGES THAT EXCEED THE PAGE LIMITATIONS SHALL NOT BE EVALUATED.

The offeror’s proposal must include all data and information required and must be submitted in accordance with these instructions. The offeror shall be compliant with the requirements as stated herein, for non-conformance may result in an unfavorable proposal evaluation.

Special Joint Venture (JV) Requirements: NOTE #1:

FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SOLICITATION A JOINT VENTURE (JV) REFERS TO A U.S.-STYLED

FORMAL LEGAL ENTITY IN THE NATURE OF A PARTNERSHIP COMPRISED OF TWO OR MORE

PERSONS OR COMPANIES. EACH JOINT VENTURE MUST PROVIDE ONE (1) CAGE/NCAGE CODE

AND ONE (1) DUNS NUMBER FOR THE JOINT VENTURE AND ONE (1) DUNS NUMBER FOR EACH

MEMBER COMPRISING THE JOINT VENTURE. EACH JOINT VENTURE MUST BE REGISTERED

IN SAM USING THE NAME OF THE JOINT VENTURE.

JV offerors shall provide with their proposal a notarized legal document that establishes the JV. The JV Agreement must be in effect upon the submission of the proposal and remain irrevocable until one (1) year after the work has been finally inspected and accepted by the Government. The notarized legal document that establishes the JV shall be furnished with the price proposal in its original language version along with a certified English translation. The validated notarized legal document must include language that each member of the JV will be jointly and severally liable for the performance of the whole contract and will be incorporated into the contract award if award is made to the JV.

1. The Joint Venture Agreement shall include, at a minimum, the following:

(a) Name of firms that form the JV and the name of the JV.

(b) Name and title of the corporate officials signing on behalf of each firm that forms the JV.

(c) Solicitation number.

(d) Description of the responsibilities in terms of work category for each member (for example: Firm A performing

100% of )

(e) The statement "The composition and structure of the JV will remain unchanged from award to one (1) year after the work has been finally inspected and accepted by the Government.”

(f) Date of issuance of the agreement and notarized signature of the corporate officials signing on behalf of each party.

(g) Statement under oath stating that the Joint Venture (JV) is in compliance at the time of proposal submission with all applicable laws, rules, and regulations. This statement must be signed under oath by all members comprising the Joint Venture.

2. The U.S. Government reserves the right to review the actual JV Agreement to determine its basis and compliance with the applicable laws. Any internal agreements affecting the internal composition of the existing JV and its potential liabilities in relation to the contract (performance guarantee, insurance, etc) must be sent to the Contracting Officer to provide notice of the same. Any change in the composition of the JV will require the JV to formally request a Novation Agreement in accordance with FAR 42.12, which will be approved/disapproved at the discretion of the Contracting Officer.

PHASE II SUBMISSION:

(APPLICABLE ONLY TO THOSE OFFERORS WHO ARE SELECTED TO PROCEED TO PHASE-II OF

THE SOURCE SELECTION PROCESS. DO NOT SUBMIT FACTORS 4, 5, 6 AND PRICE PROPOSAL

INFORMATION IN PHASE I PROPOSALS.)

Non-price Factors: Offeror shall submit one (1) marked “Original,” and four (4) copies marked “Copies,”, each in a separate binder, and two (2) electronic copies on CD with the following characteristics:

_ 8 ½ x 11 format (A4 paper is also acceptable.)

_ 12 point font, Times New Roman

_Two complete electronic copies of the technical proposal factors as a single .pdf searchable file on a CD (include with the “Original” technical submission). If there are any conflicts between hard copies and/or electronic copies, the “Original” hard copy will govern.

_ Include a cover page with Solicitation Number, Solicitation Title, Prime Contractor Name, Address, Phone Number, Fax Number, DUNS, Cage Code, Point of Contact and their phone and email address.

_ This should only include information in response to Factors 4, 5 and Price. Specific page limitations and Solicitation Submittal Requirements are specified in each Factor. PAGES THAT EXCEED THE PAGE

LIMITATIONS SHALL NOT BE EVALUATED.

The evaluation of Phase I factors will be used for an overall evaluation of the offerors’ proposals and will be carried over into Phase II.

Price:

Offerors shall submit one (1) marked “original”, one (1) marked “copy”, each in separate three-ring binder, and one

(1) electronic copy (CD format) of the solicitation submittal requirements identified below.

PROPOSALS MAY NOT BE HAND DELIVERED. ALL PROPOSALS MUST BE MAILED VIA POSTAL

SERVICES OR COMMERCIAL COURIERS SUCH AS FEDEX, DHL OR UPS.

When mailing proposal package or using a commercial courier, the offeror is advised that the Contracting Officer is on a secured base and passes are required to enter the base. Anticipate delays in base access and plan accordingly.

Hand-carried proposals must be delivered to the mailroom located in the basement of Building A, Room 0006.

Proposals shall be delivered to the mailroom between 7:30AM and 1:45PM EDT. A phone is available outside the mail room door, if delivering proposals outside the specified timeframe. If required, contact Joe Goncalves at (757) 322-8125. Government personnel will not pick up proposals at the gate. It is the contractor’s responsibility to ensure delivery to the location specified.

All visitors to the Lafayette River Annex (LRA) who do not have a CAC badge or RAPIDGATE badge must have a background check run by the Naval Station Pass & ID office (Security Department at Commander, Naval Region Mid-Atlantic (CNMRA)). Sepcial Note: DBIDS badges must be prgroammed for access to the Naval Support Activity, Hampton Roads in order to gain access to the LRA.

Visitors who do not have a CAC or DBIDS badge must complete and submit the SECNAV FORM 5512/1 to NAVFAC Atlantic Security a minimum of seventeen (17) days prior to the proposed date of visit to allow ample time to process and submit the requests to CNRMA.

The SECNAV FORM 5512/1 can be found at the following link:

https://www.cnic.navy.mil/content/dam/cnic/hq/images/DBIDS/SECNAV%20Form%205512-1.pdf

Visitor’s must transmit the completed SECNAV FORM 5512/1 form which contains Privacy Act /PII data to NAVFAC Atlantic Security via AMRDEC Safe File Exchange (SAFE) website found at the following link:

https://safe.amrdec.army.mil/safe/Welcome.aspx

Please forward the SECNAV FORM 5512/1 via the AMRDEC SAFE website to all three of the NAVFAC LANT security personnel listed below:

Robert Hernandez / Email: Robert.hernandez3@navy.mil Iris Gholston / Email: iris.gholston@navy.mil Steven K. Anderson / Email: steven.k.anderson@navy.mil

Visitors can contact the NAVFAC Atlantic Security department at 757-322-8116/8044/8116 if they have questions or need assistance.

Commercial couriers must also have their vehicle inspected at location listed in the attached LRA commercial vehicle inspection procedures prior to accessing the LRA.

Offerors should check with their intended courier to ensure they have the proper identification credentials to access the

LRA.

Temporary visitor passes must be picked up by the approved visitor from the Naval Station Pass and ID Office located at the following address prior to visiting NAVFAC Atlantic on LRA:

Address: Naval Station Pass and ID Office

9040 Hampton Blvd Norfolk, VA 23505 Telephone Number: 757-322-2975

Hours of Operation: 0600-1700 on Monday through Friday

6. EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

1. The solicitation requires the evaluation of price and the following non-price factors:

Phase I:

Factor 1 – Technical Approach Factor 2 – Experience Factor 3 – Past Performance

Phase II:

Factor 4 – Safety Factor 5 – Technical Solution

The distinction between experience and past performance is that experience pertains to the work completed by a contractor that is comparable to the types of work described under the definition of recent, relevant projects, in terms of size, scope, and complexity. Past performance pertains to both the relevance of recent efforts and how well a contractor has performed on the contracts.

2. Factors 1-3 will be evaluated in Phase I. Factors 4-5 will be evaluated in Phase II. Factor 1 (Technical Approach) will only be rated Acceptable or Unacceptable. If an Offeror is rated Unacceptable in Factor 1, then they will not be considered for Phase II. In Phase II, Factor 4 (Safety) will only be rated Acceptable or Unacceptable. If an Offeror is rated Unacceptable in any factor (Factors 1-5), they will not be eligible for award, unless the deficiency(ies) is/are remedied through discussions. In making the best value award decision after Phase II, the government will consider Factors 2, 3, 5 and price. The relative order of importance of the non-price evaluation factors is that adjectivally-rated technical factors (Factors 2 and 5) are equal to each other and when combined are of equal importance to the performance confidence assessment (Factor 3). The combined non-price factors are approximately equal to price.

The importance of price will increase if the Offerors’ non-price proposals are considered essentially equal in terms of overall quality, or if price is so high as to significantly diminish the value of a non-price proposal’s superiority to the Government. Award will be made to the responsible Offeror(s) whose offer conforms to the solicitation and represents the best value to the Government, price and non-price factors considered.

3. Basis of Evaluation and Submittal Requirements for Each Factor.

(a) Price:

(1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

Offerors shall submit one (1) marked “original”, one (1) marked “copy”, each in separate three-ring (or four-ring) binder, and one (1) electronic copy (CD format) of the solicitation submittal requirements identified below.

-SF-1442, signed -Amendments (SF30s) Acknowledged -Completed Schedule B, Pricing Form -Bid Bond -Include a cover page with Solicitation Number, Solicitation Title, Prime Contractor Name, Address, Phone Number, Fax Number, DUNS, Cage Code, Point of Contact and their phone and email address.

-Required Contractor Responsibility documentation

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO BE SUBMITTED WITH PRICE PROPOSAL PACKAGE:

RESPONSIBILITY DETERMINATION INFORMATION - In order to be eligible for award, the offeror must be determined responsible in accordance with FAR Part 9, specifically 9.104-1, General Standards. No purchase or award shall be made unless the Contracting Officer makes an affirmative determination of responsibility. To be determined responsible, a prospective contractor must have adequate financial resources to perform the contract, or the ability to obtain them. The Contracting Officer shall require acceptable evidence of the prospective contractor’s current sound financial status, as well as the ability to obtain required resources if the need arises. In regard to resources, the contractor must be prepared to present acceptable evidence of subcontracts, commitments or explicit arrangements that will be in existence at the time of contract award, to rent, purchase or otherwise acquire the needed facilities, equipment, services, materials, other resources or personnel. Consideration of a prime contractor’s compliance with limitations on subcontracting shall be taken into account for the time period covered by the contract base period or quantities, plus option periods or quantities, if such options are considered when evaluating offers for award. Pursuant to FAR 9.104-4, the Contracting Officer reserves the right to request adequate evidence of responsibility on the part of any prospective subcontractor(s). In the absence of information clearly indicating that the prospective contractor is responsible, the Contracting Officer shall make a determination of non-responsibility.

As a minimum requirement, all offerors are requested to submit, as part of the price proposal submissions, the following information.

In a separate Tab, in the English language, the offeror shall provide the following information in the price proposal package:

1. One (1) Signed Bank Reference demonstrating adequate financial resources. If offeror’s firm has a line of credit – provide information on how many figures offeror can borrow against the line of credit (i.e. medium 6 figures – exact line of credit is not required).

2. The offeror shall provide the latest three complete fiscal year financial statements for the prime contractor, certified by an independent accounting firm, if practicable, or signed by an authorized officer of the organization.

Submit evidence of availability of working/operating capital, which will be used for the performance of the resultant contract. For Joint Venture arrangements, submit the latest three complete fiscal year financial statements for each company in the Joint Venture and discuss the financial responsibilities among the companies. The Government may also utilize Dun & Bradstreet reports to evaluate the financial capacity of the offeror.

3. Point of contact from a bank or any financial institution with which the offeror transacts business.

4. Describe offeror’s facilities and equipment.

5. Other offeror’s work presently under contract.

Although required to be submitted with offeror’s price proposal, this information will not be evaluated as part of the price proposal. This information forms the basis of your firm’s responsibility determination should your firm be considered for award. Proposal packages from unsuccessful offerors will not be returned to the offeror, but shall be destroyed by the Contracting Officer. No certificate of destruction will be issued.

(2) Basis of Evaluation: The Government will evaluate price based on the total price . Total price consists of the total for all CLINS. Analysis will be performed by one or more of the following techniques to ensure a fair and reasonable price:

(i) Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the RFP.

(ii) Comparison of proposed prices with the IGCE.

(iii) Comparison of proposed prices with available historical information.

(iv) Comparison of market survey results.

(b) Non-price Factors:

Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

- Submit information for Factors 1-3 under Phase I

- Submit information for Factors 4-5 under Phase II

(1) Factor 1, Technical Approach:

(a) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The composition and management of the firms proposed as the design-build (DB) team for this contract will be evaluated in this factor.

The Offeror shall submit the following information:

(1) Provide a narrative describing the proposed primary construction firms and primary design firms for this contract and the rationale for proposing this arrangement. Provide the role, responsibilities, and contractual relationships between the various firms (see FAR Subpart 9.6). The narrative shall also include a simple organizational chart that clearly identifies the lines of authority between the entities. If the experience of an entity is being claimed in Factor 2, that entity must be named in the above narrative and organizational chart. The narrative shall also include details on how Offerors will obtain Host Nation code compliance on final designs and qualified personnel that are fluent in both English and Icelandic languages. If importing labor, describe how the Offeror will gain the host nation approvals. Offerors shall confirm National Origin of team compitision to comply with with eligability for award.

Award will be limited to U.S. and Icelandic firms only.

The technical approach narrative shall be limited to one (1) double-sided page (or two (2) single-sided pages) including the organizational chart. The information requested in item #2 below is not included in this page limitation.

(2) In addition to the narrative, the Offeror shall submit a signed copy of a joint venture agreement, partnership agreement, teaming agreement, approved mentor protégé agreement (MPA), or letter of commitment for each member of the Offeror’s team identified above (e.g., joint venture member, partner, team member, subcontractor, parent company, subsidiary, or other affiliated company, etc.).

(b) Basis of Evaluation:

The assessment of the Offeror’s technical approach will be used as a means to evaluate the organizational structure and teaming relationships proposed by the Offeror, as well as the Offeror’s plan for obtaining Host Nation code compliance on final designs, qualified personnel that are fluent in both English and Icelandic languages, and Host Nation approvals if importing labor. This factor will be rated on an Acceptable or Unacceptable basis.

(2) Factor 2, Experience:

The Offeror shall submit the following information:

(1) Construction Experience:

Submit a minimum of one (1) and maximum of five (5) relevant construction projects for the Offeror that best demonstrate experience on relevant projects that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to the RFP. For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as:

-Construction of aircraft pavements (such as runways, taxiways and aprons), with a construction value of $5,000,000 or greater, and/or;

-Airfield electrical and lighting construction on vaults, aprons, runways and taxiways (airfield lighting to include edge lights and/or in-pavement lights).

Note that to be considered relevant, a project must demonstrate experience in one of the areas outlined above.

Projects submitted shall have been completed within the past ten (10) years of the date of issuance of this RFP.

A project is defined as a construction project performed under a single task order or contract. For multiple award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project;

rather, Offerors shall submit the work performed under a task order as a project.

The attached Construction & Design Experience Project Data Sheet (Attachment A) is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information. If the same project is being used to demonstrate construction and design experience, submit separate Project Data Sheets for construction and design. Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed one (1) double-sided page (or two (2) single-sided pages).

For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP (i.e.: unique features, area, construction methods). In addition, the description should also address any sustainable features for the project, including specific descriptions of those features. Provide applicable documentation on projects that were validated and/or certified through U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) or the equivalent organization or process.

If the Offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), relevant project experience should be submitted for projects completed by the Joint Venture entity. If the Joint Venture does not have shared experience, projects may be submitted for any of the Joint Venture members. Offerors who fail to submit experience for all Joint Venture members may be rated lower.

Offerors are still limited to a total of five (5) projects combined.

If an Offeror is utilizing experience information of affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies (name is not exactly as stated on the SF1442), the proposal shall clearly demonstrate that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent firm will have meaningful involvement in the performance of the contract; in other words, the proposal should explain how the resources of the affiliated company –e.g., its workforce, management, facilities or other resources—will be provided or relied upon for contract performance such that the affiliate will have meaningul involvement in contract performance.

The Offeror may utilize experience of a subcontractor that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement to demonstrate construction experience under this evaluation factor. The Offeror must provide a letter of commitment and an explanation of the major or critical aspects of the requirement that the subcontractor will perform under this contract.

(2) Design Experience

Submit a minimum of one (1) and maximum of five (5) relevant design projects for the design team that best demonstrate design experience on relevant projects that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to the RFP. For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as:

-Design of aircraft pavements (such as runways, taxiways and aprons), with a construction value of $5,000,000 or greater, and/or;

-Design of airfield electrical and lighting construction on vaults, aprons, runways and taxiways (airfield lighting to include edge lights and/or in-pavement lights).

Offerors must provide at least one project demonstrating relevant experience in each of the two areas outlined above

Projects submitted shall have been completed within the past ten (10) years of the date of issuance of this RFP. For design-build projects, the design portion of the contract shall have been completed within the past ten (10) years of the date of issuance of this RFP.

A project is defined as a complete design effort performed under a single task order or contract/subcontract. For multiple award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project; rather, Offerors shall submit the work performed under a task order as a project. The development of a Design-Build RFP document does not qualify as a completed design.

The design completion date and/or construction completion date shall be clearly stated on the Construction & Design Experience Project Data Sheet (Attachment A). Failure to state the date clearly may result in the project not being considered. Projects in which work is still ongoing will not be considered.

The attached Construction & Design Experience Project Data Sheet (Attachment A) is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information. If the same project is being used to demonstrate construction and design experience, submit separate Project Data Sheets for construction and design. Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed one (1) double-sided page (or two (2) single-sided pages).

For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP (i.e.: unique features, area, construction methods). In addition, the description should also address any sustainable features for the project, including specific descriptions of those features. Provide applicable documentation on projects that were validated and/or certified through U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) or the equivalent organization or process.

If an Offeror is utilizing experience information of affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies (name is not exactly as stated on the SF1442), the proposal shall clearly demonstrate that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent firm will have meaningful involvement in the performance of the contract; in other words, the proposal should explain how the resources of the affiliated company –e.g., its workforce, management, facilities or other resources—will be provided or relied upon for contract performance such that the affiliate will have meaningul involvement in contract performance.

The Offeror may utilize experience of a design subcontractor to demonstrate design experience under this evaluation factor. The Offeror must provide a letter of commitment and an explanation of the involvement that the subcontractor will have in performance of this contract.

(b) Basis of Evaluation:

The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s demonstrated experience and depth of experience in performing relevant construction and design projects as defined in the solicitation submittal requirements. The assessment of the Offeror’s relevant experience will be used as a means of evaluating the capability of the Offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP. The Government will only review five (5) projects for construction and five (5) for design. Any projects submitted in excess of the five (5) for Construction Experience and five (5) for Design Experience will not be considered.

Relevant projects where the Offeror and the proposed design firm(s) have previously worked together may be considered more favorably than those that have not worked together.

Relevant projects that demonstrate design-build experience may be considered more favorably than those that do not have design-build experience.

Relevant projects that demonstrate experience where the offeror performed on an active airfield/airport may be considered more favorably.

Relevant projects performed by the Offeror may be considered more favorably than relevant projects performed by team members (such as subcontractors, affiliates/subsidiaries/parents, etc.).

(3) Factor 3, Past Performance:

If a completed Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) evaluation is available, it shall be submitted with the proposal for each project included in Factor 2 for Construction Experience and for Design Experience. If there is not a completed CPARS evaluation then submit Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQs) (Attachment B) for each project included in Factor 2 for both Construction Experience and Design Experience. The Offeror should provide completed PPQs in the proposal. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation. If the Offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the Offeror shall complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ, which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). The Government may make reasonable attempts to contact the client noted for that project(s) to obtain the PPQ information. However, Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to help ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government’s point of contact, Phil Mathews via email at philip.mathews@navy.mil.

Offerors may provide any information on problems encountered and the corrective actions taken on projects submitted under Factor 2 – Experience. Offerors may also address any adverse past performance issues.

Explanations shall not exceed two (2) double-sided pages (or four (4) single-sided pages) in total.

The Government reserves the right to contact references for verification or additional information. The Government’s inability to contact any of the Offeror’s references or the references unwillingness to provide the information requested may affect the Government’s evaluation of this factor.

Performance awards, letters of commendations or similar additional information submitted by the offeror is not desired and will not be considered.

(b) Basis of Evaluation:

This evaluation focuses on how well the Offeror performed on the relevant projects submitted under Factor 2 – Experience and past performance on other projects currently documented in known sources. More emphasis will be placed on more relevant projects. In addition to the above, the Government reserves the right to obtain information for use in the evaluation of past performance from any and all sources including sources outside of the Government.

Other sources may include, but are not limited to, past performance information retrieved through the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) using all CAGE/DUNS numbers of Contractors who are part of a partnership or joint venture identified in the Offeror’s proposal, inquiries of owner representative(s), Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS), Electronic Subcontract Reporting System (eSRS), and any other known sources not provided by the Offeror.

The Government will consider the currency and relevance of the information, the source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in the Contractor’s performance. This evaluation is separate and distinct from the Contracting Officer’s responsibility determination. The assessment of the Offeror’s past performance will be used as a means of evaluating the Offeror’s probability to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP.

Offerors lacking relevant past performance history will not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably in past performance and will receive an Unknown Confidence rating.

(4) Factor 4, Safety:

(a) Submittal Requirements:

Technical Approach for Safety:

Describe the Offeror’s technical approach to safety for its employees as well as the plan that the Offeror will implement to evaluate and measure safety performance of potential subcontractors as a part of the selection process for all levels of subcontractors. Also, describe the methods that the offeror will emply to ensure and monitor safe work practices of all subcontractor levels. The Safety Narrative, which shall include all information requested in this paragraph, shall be limited to three single-sided pages, 8 ½ x 11 (or A3, A4 page size.)

(b) Basis of Evaluation:

The Government is seeking to determine that the Offeror has consistently demonstrated a commitment to safety and that the Offeror plans to properly manage and implement safety procedures for itself and its subcontractors. The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s overall safety record, the Offeror’s plan to select and monitor subcontractors as well as the degree to which subcontractor safety performance will be considered in the selection of all levels of subcontractor on the upcoming project. The Government’s sources of information for evaluating safety may include, but are not limited to, Government agencies, OSHA, NAVFAC’s Facility Accident and Incident Reporting (FAIR) and Contractor Incident Reporting System (CIRS) databases, and other related resources. While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete safety information regarding these submittal requirements rests with the Offeror. The evaluation will collectively consider the Offeror’s technical approach to safety and other sources of information available to the Government.

This Safety Factor will be rated on an Acceptable/Unacceptable basis.

(5) Factor 5, Technical Solution:

Provide a narrative describing the technical solution to the project that meets the requirements of the RFP. Include the following:

-Description of the design/construction phasing and the coordination required with airfield operations on an active airfield.

-Description of airfield apron expansion, dangerous cargo pad, taxiway and shoulder improvements, electrical and airfield lighting improvements and how stormwater will be managed with oil/water separators.

-Description of the site improvements…