19R5017 Amend 0013.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

P19001 AIRFIELD UPGRADES, P19002: BEDDOWN SITE PREPARATION, P19003: DANGEROUS CARGO PAD, KEFLAVIK, ICELAND

The purpose of this amendment is to provide PPI responses and revisions to the specifications. Responses to additional PPIs are forthcoming.

The proposal due date is Thursday, March 19, 2020 and remains unchanged.

Please see the SF 30 Block 14 continuation page.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 14

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 09-Mar-2020

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N6247019R5017

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

29-Aug-2019

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

09-Mar-2020

CODE

COMMANDER NAVFAC ATLANTIC

6506 HAMPTON BLVD

NORFOLK VA 23508-1278

N62470 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N6247019R5017

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION 00 21 13 - INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 13

P19001 AIRFIELD UPGRADES, P19002: BEDDOWN SITE PREPARATION, P19003: DANGEROUS CARGO

PAD, KEFLAVIK, ICELAND

The purpose of this amendment is provide the following:

1. Responses to PPIs

2. Revisions to Specifications

1. Responses to PPIs:

REFERENCE

QUESTION GOV Responses Page Section Para.

PART 5

- 32 13 14.13

2.2

2.2 Cementitious Materials

a) Is the use of supplementary cementitious mterials (SCM) mandatory?

b) Is the use of microsilica accepted?

A) See Part 5 - 32 13 14.13 Section 2.2.5

B) YES

PART 5

- 32 13 14.13

2.3

2.3 Aggregates

a) Aggregates are not tested in Iceland according to ASTM C88. Is it sufficient to fulfill the European requirements of ÍST EN 12620?

b) Is the use of ASR inhibitors mandatory?

A) Specifications can be edited to suit icelandic norms B) See Part 5 - 32 13 14.13 Section 2.2.5

PART 5

- 32 13 14.13

2.11

2.11 Equipment

a) Steypustöðins plant is located in approximately 10 km distance. The backup plant is in 35 km distance.

Would that be accepted?

YES

PART 5

- 32 13 14.13

As the raw materials are processed according to Icelandic/European standards would it be accepted to design the concrete based on the target performance rather than following the detailed prescriptive specifications according to the American standards. The performance based design would be executed following the main guidelines of ACI 329R-14.

This is a design build project. It is intended for the contractor to design and construct the projects to meet or exceed the US specified standards. ÍST EN standards can be used if they can be shown to be equivalent as the US ASTM or ACI standards. Design Build requirements can be found in FC 1- 300-09N.

Page Section Para.

PDF 14

of 425

Att (H) P19000

1 EDI

Airfield Upgrad es Apron

Expansi on

Design Build

RFP

1.4.4

Reference states that working hours must consist of an 8 hour period established by the CO Monday through Friday. This appears unachievable and, in fact, not allowed by specifications. For example:

- Joint sawing is required to continue both day and night

- Concrete paving operations that are allowed to finish a whole lane without transverse construction joints is preferred

- Asphalt Paving is much preferred to be allowed to continue with as few cold joints as possible

- Weather conditions are such that all acceptable weather should be taken advantage of and are normally carried out while there is daylight and during weekends In view of this we request that this work restriction be waived.

Normal work hours will be established from 0800 - 1700 Monday through Friday. Work outside regular hours is allowed.

Work outside regular hours should be requested 15 calendar days in advance in writing to the CM/ET.

32 01 16.71 Cold

Milling Asphalt Paving

1.3.3 Straight

Edge

It is not clear to us what type of straightedge is referred to in this section. Contractor uses a traditional three-meter-long straightedge and wishes to use this type of straightedge.

This is a design build project. It is intended for the contractor to design and construct the projects to meet or exceed the US specified standards. ÍST EN standards can be used if they can be shown to be equivalent as the US ASTM or ACI standards. Design Build requirements can be found in FC 1-

32 12 15.13

Asphalt Paving for Airlfield

1.2.1 Mat

and Joint Densities

This section states that all density results for each lot (lot = 2.000 tons) should be made available 24 hours after paving, including “TMD”, theoritical maximum density”, from the asphalt production and from the core samples.

- It takes the laboratory approximately 48 hours to prepare, analyze and process each sample from the asphalt production and the core samples. The core samples are obtained by

This is a design build project. It is intended for the contractor to design and construct the projects to meet or exceed the US specified standards. ÍST EN standards can be used if they can be shown to be equivalent as the US ASTM or ACI standards. Design Build

Page Section Para.

drilling after a minimum of 24-hourperiod, or in some cases, 48 hours, in order to avoid damaging the asphalt. Once the cores are obtained, they must be dried and processed.

- Contractor suggests that results from density testing, including the “TMD”, will be delivered to the USG two days (max time limit) after a lot has been completed, and theresults from the core analysis will be delivered three days (max time limit) after a lot has been completed.

- Please note that this applies to workdays only, and that weekends should not be taken into account, considering regulations regarding work during the weekend, et cetera.

Asphalt Paving for Airlfield

1.2.3 Payment

Adjustmen t for

Smoothnes s (Final

Wearing Surface Only)

This section asks for time-consuming straightedge-measurements in order to find out about the eveness payfactors.

- Contractor requests a meeting with a representative from the client/buyer in order to decide the method of the measurements and to prevent any misunderstandings afterwards.

- Contractor needs more detailed explanations.

Pay Factors do not matter in this project. The contractor is being paid in a lump sum to provide the design and construction of this project. There will be no deductions based on evenness/compaction, etc.. Those table are meant to show to the contractor what is not acceptable to the US Government.

Asphalt Paving for Airlfield

1.2.4 Laboratory Air Voids

and Theoretical Maximum

Density

Contractor suggests that asphalt testing, including air voids, will be made available 48 hours after a lot has been completed. This period is limited to working days.

This is a design build project. It is intended for the contractor to design and construct the projects to meet or exceed the US specified standards. ÍST EN standards can be used if they can be shown to be equivalent as the US ASTM or ACI standards. Design Build

Page Section Para.

Asphalt Paving for Airlfield

1.2.6 Pay

Adjustmen t Based on

Grade

Our understanding of this section is that a string/strings and a small level indicator should be used to measure the inclination Contractor is unfamiliar with this method

- In Contractor's opinion, measuring every 7,6 meters is redundant

- The method appears to be very time-consuming and in Contractors opinion, a more practical way to execute these measurements would be to request “promillinclination” numbers and apply it with the use of straightedge and “promillinclination” level indicator. Contractor requests that this method be accepted.

- Contractor also requests that measurements will be taken with more distance between.

This is a design build project. It is intended for the contractor to design and construct the projects to meet or exceed the US specified standards. ÍST EN standards can be used if they can be shown to be equivalent as the US ASTM or ACI standards. Design Build requirements can be found in FC 1- 300-09N.

32 12 15.13

Asphalt Paving for Airlfield

1.4.4.1.1 Straighted ge Testing

This section refers to a different length straightedge than previously stated.

Contractor asks whether it is acceptable to use a three-meter long straightedge for measuring the eveness, as referred to in ÍST EN 13036-7: 2013

This is a design build project. It is intended for the contractor to design and construct the projects to meet or exceed the US specified standards. ÍST EN standards can be used if they can be shown to be equivalent as the US ASTM or ACI standards. Design Build requirements can be found in FC 1- 300-09N.

32 12 15.13

Asphalt Paving for Airlfield

1.4.4.2.2 Bumps ("Must Grind" Areas)

A so-called “Diamond Grinder” is not available in Iceland.

Contractor's only option is to mill the insufficient asphalt and re-pave any inadequate areas

- Contractor requests authorization to mill areas which do not fulfill the requirements.

This is a design build project. It is intended for the contractor to design and construct the projects to meet or exceed the US specified standards. ÍST EN standards can be used if they can be shown to be equivalent as the US ASTM or ACI standards. Design Build

Page Section Para.

32 12 15.13

Asphalt Paving for Airlfield

2.2 Aggregates

This section requires that aggregates will be analyzed and processed.

- Does the USG accept the CE-certification, certified by the aggregates’ producer, or does the client/buyer require individual research results?

This is a design build project. It is intended for the contractor to design and construct the projects to meet or exceed the US specified standards. ÍST EN standards can be used if they can be shown to be equivalent as the US ASTM or ACI standards. Design Build requirements can be found in FC 1- 300-09N.

32 12 15.13

Asphalt Paving for Airlfield

2.2.4 Aggregate Gradation

Table 5 and Table 8 are not refer to the same sieve sets. Table 8 contains sievesizes in accordance with IST EN 933-2, as required in the project description, but Table 8 does not.

- Contractor requests that sieve-sizes, in accordance with IST EN 933-2, apply, as this is standard procedure in Iceland

- Contractor requests that the requirements for the grading curve in Table 5 will be changed in accordance with ISAVIA’s (Keflavik Airport Authority) requirements and Contractor's asphalt mixes, which have been delivered to the client/buyer.

This is a design build project. It is intended for the contractor to design and construct the projects to meet or exceed the US specified standards. ÍST EN standards can be used if they can be shown to be equivalent as the US ASTM or ACI standards. Design Build requirements can be found in FC 1- 300-09N.

32 12 15.13

Asphalt Paving for Airlfield

2.4 Mix

Design

This section requires the making of “Marshall Design Mix” six months before the project begins.

- Contractor suggests that the design mix which has been in use at Keflavik Airport for the last few years, will be used in this project, as well (the mix has been delivered to the client/buyer), and in turn, it is unnecessary to create a new asphalt mix

This is a design build project. It is intended for the contractor to design and construct the projects to meet or exceed the US specified standards. ÍST EN standards can be used if they can be shown to be equivalent as the US ASTM or ACI standards. Design Build

Page Section Para.

32 12 15.13

Asphalt Paving for Airlfield

3.1.2.2 Aggregate Properties

Requirements regarding aggregate testing every 18,000 metric tons

- Does this refer to 18 thousand tons, not 18 tons?

- If the relevant information is found in the CE certification from the aggregates’ producers, is that sufficient?

- The amount of aggregates estimated for this project does not reach 18,000 metric tons.

This is a design build project. It is intended for the contractor to design and construct the projects to meet or exceed the US specified standards. ÍST EN standards can be used if they can be shown to be equivalent as the US ASTM or ACI standards. Design Build requirements can be found in FC 1- 300-09N.

32 12 15.13

Asphalt Paving for Airlfield

3.1.2.6 Laboratory Air Voids, VMA, Marshall Stability

Flow

This section mentions 2 x 50 blows with the Marshall hammer

- The standard for airports in generally 2 x 75 blows, is this not in accordance with requirements?

This is a design build project. It is intended for the contractor to design and construct the projects to meet or exceed the US specified standards. ÍST EN standards can be used if they can be shown to be equivalent as the US ASTM or ACI standards. Design Build requirements can be found in FC 1- 300-09N.

32 12 15.13

Asphalt Paving for Airlfield

3.1.4 Control Charts

Table 8 contains three differing gradations for VMA, 1, 2, and 3.

- This is unclear: Table 8 seemingly expects Marshall-samples created with both 50 and 75 blows. Is this a misunderstanding? In our understanding, 75 blows suffice.

- Table 8 shows “Flow, 0,25 mm”:

it is unclear to Contractor what 0,25 mm refers to.

This is a design build project. It is intended for the contractor to design and construct the projects to meet or exceed the US specified standards. ÍST EN standards can be used if they can be shown to be equivalent as the US ASTM or ACI standards. Design Build requirements can be found in FC 1- 300-09N.

32 12 15.13

Asphalt Paving for Airlfield

3.9.1 Transverse

Joints

In our understanding, it is forbidden to mill transverse junctions

- If this is the case, all edges, on all newly constructed lots, must be cut with a roller before the asphalt cools beyond a certain temperature

- Whilst paving in Keflavik Airport, the requirements have always included the milling of transverse junctions, and Contractor requests that this will also be the case in this project

This is a design build project. It is intended for the contractor to design and construct the projects to meet or exceed the US specified standards. ÍST EN standards can be used if they can be shown to be equivalent as the US ASTM or ACI standards. Design Build

Page Section Para.

32 12 15.13

Asphalt Paving for Airlfield

3.9.2 Longitudin

al

Is Contractor expected to cut the longitudinal joints without the use of water?

- It is unclear what is meant by “cutting wheel”; are we to roll the longitudinal joints?

This is a design build project. It is intended for the contractor to design and construct the projects to meet or exceed the US specified standards. ÍST EN standards can be used if they can be shown to be equivalent as the US ASTM or ACI standards. Design Build requirements can be found in FC 1- 300-09N.

32 12 15.13

Asphalt Paving for Airlfield

3.9.3 Asphalt

Pavement- Portland Cement

Concrete Joints

Contractor does not possess the types, neither size nor model, of rollers mentioned in this section.

- Contractor requests permission to use the rollers, which the company possesses, so called combi-roller, with both steel and rubber drums which is ca 7-9 metric tons This "combi-roller" is acceptable.

This is a design build project. It is intended for the contractor to design and construct the projects to meet or exceed the US specified standards. ÍST EN standards can be used if they can be shown to be equivalent as the US ASTM or ACI standards. Design Build requirements can be found in FC 1- 300-09N.

32 12

Bitumin ous Tack and

Prime Coats

Contractor has not calibrated thermometers or other similar equipment on the sprayers, except the so-called “carpet test,” which measures the amount sprayed by the vehicle.

- We suggest that the Carpet test will suffice this clause of calibrations.

This is a design build project. It is intended for the contractor to design and construct the projects to meet or exceed the US specified standards. ÍST EN standards can be used if they can be shown to be equivalent as the US ASTM or ACI standards. Design Build requirements can be found in FC 1- 300-09N.

Att (H)

pg. 33 Att (I)

pg. 32 Att (J)

pg. 33

01 31 23.13.2

1.5

Please explain NAVFACs expectations for CUI/FOUO compliance on this project with respect to non US companies.

Please confirm the documentation for this project outside of the eCMS system does not require FOUO markings and is not required to follow the documentation requirements and restrictions to be in compliance with the CUI/FOUO designation.

FOUO compliance is not required.

However, Contractors are responsible to comply with Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) Clause 252.204-7012, Safeguarding Covered Defense Information and Cyber Incident Reporting.

Att (H) pg.

297+ Att (I) Att (J) pg.

Part 5 32 13 14.13

1.4

It is not typical for laboratories in Iceland to have accredidation in accordance with the specification.

Will licensed laboratories according to host nations laws without the US accredidations be

The laboratories need to be accredited according to the host nation laws.

Page Section Para.

297+ acceptable?

Att (H)

pg. 311 Att (I) Att (J)

pg. 311

Part 5 32 13 14.13

2.3.2.1

Aggregates for concrete are not typically tested in Iceland according to ASTM C88. Is it sufficient to fulfill host nation requirements by following the European requirements of ÍST EN 12620?

This is a design build project. It is intended for the contractor to design and construct the projects to meet or exceed the US specified standards. ÍST EN standards can be used if they can be shown to be equivalent as the US ASTM or ACI standards. Design Build requirements can be found in FC 1- 300-09N.

Att (H) pg.

290+ Att (I) Att (J) pg.

290+

Part 5 32 13 14.13

General

As the raw materials are processed according to Icelandic/European standards, would it be accepted to design the concrete based on the target performance and the european requirements stated in ÍST EN 206 rather than following the prescriptive specifications according to the American standards?

This is a design build project. It is intended for the contractor to design and construct the projects to meet or exceed the US specified standards. ÍST EN standards can be used if they can be shown to be equivalent as the US ASTM or ACI standards. Design Build requirements can be found in FC 1- 300-09N.

Att (H) P19001

pg. 194

Part 3 G30

According to UFC 3-260-01 chapter 6, paragraph 5.7 the minimum requirements for design and maintainance of the drainage system of aircraft fueling ramps are given in the NFPA 415.

According to NFPA 415 (see NFPA 415 Annex A, Paragraph A.5.1.1) the following consideration should be given "A ratio of 40,000 ft2 (3716 m2) per drainage inlet should not be exceeded with minimum flow distances to drains, but drain inlets should be located so as not to endanger aircraft placements within the ramp area so described.". Since the apron expansion is a new construction it is possible to decrease the area/inlet as NFP415 recommends.

By following this requirement it is avoidable that fuel spills from the northern row of aircraft spreads over to the southern row that could potentially endanger other aircrafts on the apron. To achieve

An additional drainage channel on the apron area is not necessary, as fueling operations will be minimal.

Bid on the single drainage channel on the southern edge, as described in the RFP.

Page Section Para.

this an addition drainage channel is required on the apron area in addition to the apron edge drainage channel originally required. Is this something that should be considered in the bid?

Att (H) P19000 Att (I) P19000 Att (J) P19000

General

Please confirm that the prescriptive specifications can be modified during the design from US standards and qualifications to standards and norms that are applicable to construction in Iceland.

See amendment

Att (H) pg.

297+ Att (I) Att (J) pg.

297+

Part 5 32 13 14.13

1.4

Is certification of personnel and equipment according to American standards mandatory or is it acceptable for personnel and equipment to meet European standards?

This is a design build project. It is intended for the contractor to design and construct the projects to meet or exceed the US specified standards. ÍST EN standards can be used if they can be shown to be equivalent as the US ASTM or ACI standards. Design Build requirements can be found in FC 1- 300-09N.

Att (H) P19001

pg. 184

Part 3 3.2

According to the RFP the new stormwater system should be connected to the existing system.

Please confirm the existing edge drain and piping along the existing apron has capacity for the new edge drain and piping to be connected.

Bid per RFP Part 3, Section 3.2, bullet point 7 "Provide an edge drain (airfield rated) and oil water separator to connect to existing system."

Att (H)

pg. 184 Part 3 3.2

190002 part 3, 3.2 The joints are to match existing. Should the bidder assume that that the pavement sections of the Apron rigid pavement (concrete) are to be the same dimensions as what is already in the existing apron or is it acceptable that the longitudinal joints across the length of the apron line up with what is existing and the joints across the width of

Yes. It acceptable that the longitudinal joints across the length of the apron line up with what is existing and the joints across the width of the apron can be different spacing than what exists. If the joints are offset from the existing, the first adjacent row of pavement should be reinforced per UFC 3-260-02.

Page Section Para.

the apron can be different spacing than what exists?

Att (I) pg.

Option

Is ducting for the electrical distribution from the electrical building to the PSCs required without concrete encasement if CLIN 4, bid Option 3 does not get awarded?

Yes. Please see Amended RFP Section G40 language included.

Att (H) P19001

pg. 192

Part 3 G2020

RFP part 3, 1.0 parking description states that the current apron supports half of what is needed. It is assumed that the new apron extension is intended to serve the same number of aircraft. By looking at the layout provided with the RFP Amendment 6 attachment Q we have the following comments. Due to space restrictions, the peripheral and interior taxilane of the new apron will need to be to be designed according to the European EASA regulation, Code D restricted aircraft (B707) to fit the apron dimension provided in Part 6. If the design is required to be according to the UFC (more stringent) and the geometrical design aircraft is the B707, the apron dimension are recommended to be reevaluated.

This reevaluation potentially impacts the total square meterage of the apron expansion necessary.

Requirements such as "Distance from peripheral taxilane centerline to the outside edge of the apron boundary marking" and "Wingtip clearance of aircraft on through or primary peripheral taxiway" are not fulfilled without reevaluating the dimensions of the apron.

Please confirm if the dimensions are to follow the UFC requirements and if so please provide updated quantities for the total square meterage of apron

Area of the apron is governed by the DD1391 and cannot be changed. Use EASA requirements for the apron.

Page Section Para.

required for bidding purposes.

Att (H) P19001

pg. 184

Part 3 3.2

Please confirm if the tiedown/mooring eyes and grounding points are to be designed according to the Navy requirements set by UFC 3-260-01 appendix B11-6. If not please specify which requirement to follow in the UFC.

Use Air Force requirements

Att (H) P19001

pg. 184

Part 3 3.2

Please confirm that the layout of the tiedown/mooring eyes are to match existing layout on the apron (see drawing C-135, attachment A

- Drawings in the RFP), if not please give further guidance on layout requirements for bidding purposes.

For bidding purposes, use a similar grid pattern as the existing apron and Air Force requirements from the UFC

Att (H) P19001

pg. 184

Part 3 3.2

Please confirm that it is expected that a grounding rod is attached to each and every tiedown/mooring eye as is specified in UFC 3-260-01 Appendix B paragraph B11-1.5. If not please give guidance on the expected quantities of grounding rods.

Yes, a grounding rod is attached to each tie down/mooring eye

Att (I) P19000 2 pg.

Part 2 2.3.7

Please provide the Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability (C-I-A) risk levels for the systems on the P- 19002 beddown site project that require cybersecurity.

There are no building DDC's or any facility-related control systems in P190002 project applicable to UFC- 4-010-06. Cybersecurity for the telecom/data system as well as the final system connections and configuration for the site is handled by NMCI, not the Bidder.

However, installation of the fiber and telecom cable and conduit from existing site infrastructure to the Beddown Site electrical

Page Section Para.

building is part of the P190002 project.

Att (I) P19000 2 pg.

Part 2 2.3.7

Please provide the systems on the P-19002 Beddown Site project that the government anticipates requiring cybersecurity.

The US Govt does not require or expect facility-related control systems for the project P190002 per UFC 4-010-06. If the Bidder is going to propose such a system, then it must be identified in their Bid and eventually approved by the System Owner and the Authorizing Official from the US Govt.

2. Revisions to Specifications:

P190001

DOCUMENT RFP PART 3 PROJECT PROGRAM

3.2 SITE DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS

After the text: “Provide an edge drain (airfield rated) and oil water separator to connect to existing system” add the following:

“The new edge drain / oil water separator system shall be sized to accommodate the new apron expansion. The outfall for the new oil/water separator system shall connect to the existing base-wide (open-channel) drainage system.”

P190001, P190002, and P190003 RFP Part 2, 01 33 10.05 20 Design Submittal Procedures, 1.9 SPECIFICATIONS which states; “Specification sections in Part 5 become a part of the Contractor-originated specification without modification.”

Replace in its entirety with the following text:

“Contractor shall modify specification sections in Part 5 to meet local Host Nation codes and norms.”

P190002

DOCUMENT RFP PART 3 PROJECT PROGRAM

6.0 ENGINEERING SYSTEM REQUIREMENTS

G4010 ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION

Replace the third paragraph in its entirety with the following text:

BID OPTION (as described in this paragraph): Provide a concrete-encased ductbank system for the underground electrical site distribution system from the PSCs out to each SDC. This system is shown on the single line diagram and is described as the underground electrical ductbank system exterior to the site electrical building. The ductbank system is expected to carry power circuits greater than of 600V. Provide cable pull strings in all empty conduits in the ductbank. Cables for the ductbank system are to be provided and installed by others. Provide manholes for cable pull points along all ductbank as needed. The intent is that the Contractor will design and build a prepositioned concrete-encased ductbank system serving the expeditionary equipment. The layout design should allow for maximum layout flexibility for the Customer’s shelters and equipment while maintaining UFC and Host Nation code compliance, safety to personnel, and reasonable cost of installation. Provide NEMA 3R or IP54 or higher rated outdoor enclosures from underground conduit stub-ups for easier cable connection access points for the SDC’s as needed. Designs should work to accommodate Customer provided expeditionary equipment, cables, and cable connections. Electrical distribution equipment enclosures should be protected by bollards. Refer to drawing attachments C101 & E-101 for the Site Plans.

(End of Summary of Changes)