Guardian_Angel_SF1442.pdf

P-3005 GUARDIAN ANGEL OPERATIONS FACILITY, AVIANO, ITALY

TIME AND DUE DATE FOR PROPOSALS IS LISTED IN BLOCK 13 BELOW & IN SECTION 00100 BIDDING SCHEDULE/INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS

SEE SECTION 00100 BIDDING SCHEDULE/INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS FOR BASE ACCESS PROCEDURES FOR DELIVERY OF PROPOSALS

SEE SECTION 00100 BIDDING SCHEDULES/INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDERS FOR SITE VISIT INFORMATION

OFFERORS ARE ADVISED THAT FUNDING MAY NOT BECOME AVAILABLE, IF FUNDS ARE NOT AVAILABLE, NO AWARD WILL BE MADE AS

A RESULT OF THIS SOLICITATION.

OFFERORS WILL NOT BE REIMBURSED FOR ANY EFFORT OR PROPOSAL COSTS RESULTING FROM THIS SOLICITATION.

NICHOLAS A. NICHOLAS 757-322-8123

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS

NEGOTIATED

20-Dec-2017

(RFP)

(IFB)

X

CALL:

B. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)

See Item 7

2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID

3. DATE ISSUED

9. FOR INFORMATION A. NAME

SOLICITATION

NSN 7540-01-155-3212 1442-101 STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 4-85)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.236-1(e)

11. The Contractor shall begin performance w ithin _______15 calendar days and complete it w ithin ________850 calendar days after receiving aw ard, X notice to proceed. This performance period is mandatory, negotiable. (See _________________________

12 A. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?

(If "YES," indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12B.)

X YES NO

13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:

A. Sealed offers in original and __________4 copies to perform the w ork required are due at the place specified in Item 8 by ___________ local time ______________19 Jan 2018 (date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers must be publicly opened at that time.

shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time offers are due.

B. An offer guarantee is, X is not required.

C. All offers are subject to the (1) w ork requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.

D. Offers providing less than _______120 calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due w ill not be considered and w ill be rejected.

SOLICITATION, OFFER,

AND AWARD

(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

1. SOLICITATION NO.

IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.

4. CONTRACT NO.

7. ISSUED BY CODE

NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COMMAND

ATLANTIC DIVISION

6506 HAMPTON BLVD

NORFOLK VA 23511

N62470

PAGE OF PAGES

1 OF

CODE

(Title, identifying no., date):

12B. CALENDAR DAYS

02:00 PM (hour)

Sealed envelopes containing offers

5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NO. 6. PROJECT NO.

8. ADDRESS OFFER TO (If Other Than Item 7)

FAX:TEL: TEL: FAX:

N6247018R4004 45

20B. SIGNATURE

(REV. 4-85)STANDARD FORM 1442 BACK

TO SIGN

NSN 7540-01-155-3212

SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD (Continued) (Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

CODE FACILITY CODE

17. The offeror agrees to perform the w ork required at the prices specif ied below in strict accordance w ith the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in w riting w ithin ________ calendar days after the date offers are due.

the minimum requirements stated in Item 13D. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13D.)

AMOUNTS SEE SCHEDULE OF PRICES

18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.

19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation -- give number and date of each)

AMENDMENT NO.

DATE

20A. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN

OFFER (Type or print)

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:

22. AMOUNT 23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN ITEM

(4 copies unless otherwise specified)

CODE

(Insert any number equal to or greater than

20C. OFFER DATE

25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO

10 U.S.C. 2304(c) 41 U.S.C. 253(c)

CODE27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY:26. ADMINISTERED BY

(Include ZIP Code)14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR 15. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code)

See Item 14

(Include only if different than Item 14)16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS

30B. SIGNATURE

29. AWARD (Contractor is not required to sign this document.)

document and return _______ copies to issuing office.) Contractor agrees Your of f er on this solicitation, is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award con-to f urnish and deliv er all items or perf orm all work, requisitions identif ied summates the contract, which consists of (a) the Gov ernment solicitation and on this f orm and any continuation sheets f or the consideration stated in this y our of f er, and (b) this contract award. No f urther contractual document is contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be necessary .

gov erned by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certif ications, and specif ications or incorporated by ref er-ence in or attached to this contract.

30A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED 31A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

30C. DATE

(Type or print)

TEL: EMAIL:

31B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 31C. AWARD DATE

BY

CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE

(Contractor is required to sign this28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT

(M ust be fully completed by offeror)OFFER

N6247018R4004

Section 00010 - Solicitation Contract Form

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

Base Price

FFP

Price for the entire work, in accordance with the drawings and specifications, in accordance with the RFP, but excluding work described in CLIN 0002.

FOB: Destination

NET AMT

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

OPTION Option 1 - Electronic Security System

FFP

Price for provision, design, installation, testing, and associated training for the Electronic Security System (ESS) equipment necessary in accordance with the request for proposal, but excluding work described in CLIN 0001. The ESS includes, but is not limited to, Intrusion Detection System (IDS), Access Control System (ACS), and Closed Circuit Television (CCTV) complete in accordance with the RFP. Equipment includes items such as Premise Control Units (PCU), central processing units, field panels, sensors, card readers, keypads, cameras, switches, video recorders, workstations, and the communication cabling connecting these devices together.

Do not include the price for supporting, permanent infrastructure (both interior and exterior) in the CLIN 0002 price. Include that price instead under CLIN 0001- BASE PRICE. Interior supporting infrastructure includes items such as conduit, junction boxes, electronic door strikes, door hardware, mounting hardware, and power connections. Exterior supporting infrastructure includes items such as exterior ductbanks, manholes, utility poles, utility connections, and power connections.

FOB: Destination

NET AMT

INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE TERMS

Supplies/services will be inspected/accepted at:

CLIN INSPECT AT INSPECT BY ACCEPT AT ACCEPT BY

0001 N/A N/A N/A Government 0002 N/A N/A N/A Government

DELIVERY INFORMATION

CLIN DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /

CAGE

0001 N/A N/A N/A N/A

0002 N/A N/A N/A N/A

DESCRIPTION OF WORK

This Request for Proposal (RFP) is to design and build a fully operational Guardian Angels Operations Facility (GAOF) for the 57th Ready Qualified to Stand-by (RQS) Squadron, including Squadron Operations, Warehouse, and Aquatic facilities, at Aviano Air Force Base, Aviano, Italy. The facility must be compatible with applicable Department of Defense (DoD), Air Force, and Aviano Air Base Installation Design Guide standards.

Site functions include an exterior area for a “Protection of the Force and Family” (POTFF) turf area of 1,500 GSM (16,150 GSF) and a 9.3 GSM (100 GSF) storage function for the POTFF area (storage to be Government Furnished Government Installed [GFGI]). Other exterior functions on the site include sidewalks and flatwork at the Squadron Patio, concrete pads for an Intermediate Storage Unit (ISU) area, ISU staging area, Armory ISU, and Climbing Apparatus equipment. Other concrete surface pads and stucco- finished concrete masonry unit (CMU) enclosures are designated at the power generator and fuel tanks as well as the enclosed Mechanical Yard. In the same area is a concrete pad within the CMU trash enclosure. Concrete driveway and apron surfaces are required at forklift service entries, and concrete stoops are designated at service room entries.

The building must not exceed 7,285 GSM, (78,415 GSF) to comply with the DD1391. The interior programmed functions are divided into Squadron facilities (6,785 GSM [73,033 GSF]) and Aquatic facilities (500 GSM [(5,382 GSF]) Vertical requirements vary by use area: approximately an 11 m (36- foot) two- story high bay warehouse facility, a 10 m (33- foot) two- story squad operations area, a 7 m (23- foot) one- story aquatics area, and a 30.5 m (100- foot) parachute drying tower. The building must contain a minimum of two fully enclosed stairs and one 2-stop hydraulic elevator. Egress widths that meet Italian code for exit width per occupant are widened stairs or a third stair.

Functional areas within the 57th Squadron facility include three distinct program needs: Command Operations, Recovery Team, and Logistics. Building elements within Command Operations include squadron briefing and break rooms, shared and single- person work spaces and offices, training rooms, a conference facility, flight planning areas, and designated secured areas. Recovery Team areas generally include mission planning rooms , flight rooms, gear supply and maintenance areas, and the cages and POTFF functions with supporting Physical Therapy offices and exam rooms. Logistics areas in general include a high bay space with a 2-ton hoist crane, gear and weapons preparation, maintenance and storage facilities, parachute packing and storage, interior ISUs and supply storage and distribution functions, and scuba and Aquatics areas. All program functions are served by common support restrooms and shower/locker facilities.

The design also requires support areas that include mechanical rooms, telecom and electrical rooms, custodial rooms, and an elevator machine room, as well as general circulation space throughout the building. The entire facility must be designed and built as a Primary Gathering Facility within a Controlled Perimeter per UFC 4-010-01, DoD Minimum Antiterrorism Standards for Buildings, Appendix B, Tables B-1 and B-2, and as directed by UFC 4-010-05, The design must also address host nation requirements and local jurisdiction force protection criteria.

Section 00100 - Bidding Schedule/Instructions to Bidders

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

List of Attachments:

(A) Construction & Design Experience Project Data Sheet

(B) Past Performance Questionnaire

(C) One Day Pass Request form

(D) Pre Proposal Inquiry Form

1. OVERVIEW OF THIS SOURCE SELECTION:

This solicitation is being conducted using two (2)-phase design/build procedures in accordance with FAR Part 36.

The best value continuum source selection process used in this acquisition is the tradeoff process. Award will be made to that responsible offeror whose proposal, conforming to the solicitation, is determined to offer the best value to the Government considering the technical and price factors stated herein.

The Government reserves the right to eliminate from consideration any or all offerors at any time prior to award of the contract; to negotiate with offerors in the competitive range; to award the contract to other than the offeror submitting the lowest total price; and to award the contract to the offeror submitting the proposal determined to be the best value.

This acquisition will result in a firm fixed price contract for design/build construction services. In accordance with FAR 36.205 statutory cost limitation for P3005 Guardian Angel Operations Facility is $23,592,000 USD.

The contract completion time is 850 days after the initial Notice to Proceed.

The Government intends to award a contract to a single contractor for CLIN 0001 with CLIN 0002 as a priced option. The Government reserves the unilateral right to award Option (CLIN 0002) to the contractor at the time of award or within 365 calendar days after contract award. Offerors must submit a price for each of CLIN 0001 and CLIN 0002. Offerors not submitting pricing for all CLINS will be considered non-responsive to the solicitation and will not be evaluated.

INTENT TO AWARD WITHOUT DISCUSSIONS: Proposals must be set forth full, accurate and complete information as required by this Request for Proposal (including attachments). The penalty for making false statements in proposals is prescribed in 18 U.S.C. 1001. The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award without discussions. However, the Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if it is later determined by the Contracting Officer to be necessary. Therefore, each initial offer should contain the best terms from a technical, cost and price standpoint.

2. SITE VISITS

A site visit to Aviano Air Force Base, Aviano, Italy is not mandatory for this procurement. Offerors will have the opportunity for a site visit during Phase II of the solicitation. Any requests for a site visit during Phase I will not be accommodated. The Phase II site visit information will be provided with the Phase II amendment.

3. ELIGIBILITY FOR AWARD

SYSTEM FOR AWARD MANAGEMENT

To be eligible for award, your firm(s) must be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) database as required as required by FAR 52.204-7, System for Award Management (Oct 2016).

See Section 00100 and the following:

Note that the System for Award Management (SAM) is required for all offerors; including Joint Ventures (JV) (registration must state the NAME of the JV). Offerors not currently registered in SAM must obtain a DUN & Bradstreet (DUNS) number and a CAGE or NCAGE prior to registering in SAM.

All offerors, including JV offerors, must submit with their proposal a DUNS number. In addition to the DUNS number required for JV offerors, JV offerors must submit with their proposal a DUNS number for each member comprising the JV. DUNS numbers can be obtained at http://fedgov.dnb.com/webform. The DUNS number is required in order to register in SAM (see above.)

CAGE/NCAGE – A CAGE/NGAGE code is required for all offerors, including JV offerors. JV offerors must acquire a CAGE Code registered in the JV name.

(a) U.S. Offerors, including Joint Venture offerors: U.S. offerors must obtain a CAGE Code prior to registering in the SAM database, part of the SAM registration process (see paragraph above.)

4. CERTIFICATE OF CLASSIFICATION

SOCIETÀ ORGANISMI DI ATTESTAZIONE (SOA) CERTIFICATION.

The following SOA Certifications are required, offeror must show that the necessary Certifications are in effect as of the date proposals are due, and must be submitted with the Phase I Proposal:

The Prevailing Work Category: OG-01 VIII

The related classifications (sub-categories) and percentages for this work category:

Classification OS-4

Percentage of Work 1%

Classification OS-28

Percentage of Work 13%

Classification OS-30

Percentage of Work 16%

Companies that are QUALIFIED in the Prevailing Work Category and pertinent Classification, but NOT QUALIFIED also in the Minor Work Category and pertinent Classification, can still bid against the subject solicitation, by forming a Joint-Venture or subcontracting for the execution of the work pertaining to the categories (or alternatives) for which they are not qualified. Offerors must declare their intention of forming the Joint-Venture or awarding a subcontract. A "Teaming Agreement" or "Letter of Commitment" with the subcontractor must be submitted with the proposal and must identify the qualifications of the subcontractor (attaching the pertinent SOA certificate) and what work they will perform (identifying type and percentage of the work covered by specific SOA certificate).

In the case of a JV, at least one member of the JV must have the required SOA Certifications. The JV member who has the SOA Certification must perform the majority of the work pertinent to the certification. In the case of a JV certification submitted by a subcontractor will not be accepted.

As required by DPR 554, art 75 and DPR 412 /2000 Contracting Officer shall require the apparent successful bidder/offeror to submit additional documentation, upon Contracting Officer’s demand, for evaluation of firm's technical and financial qualifications to execute the work.

Debarment from Award:

As required by article 75 of DPR 554 and DPR 412/2000, Contractors cannot bid if they have a history of, or there is an existing question relative to:

- Bankruptcy

- Pending Charges

- Final Penal Judgment for moral and/or professional misconduct

- Breach of use of unauthorized subcontractors, i.e. anti-trust laws

- Breach of safety / security or labor regulations

- Serious malpractice or negligence

- Tax payments violations

- False or fraudulent representations in prior solicitations

Contractor must submit extract from criminal record or affidavits released by the local court of Contractor’s residence.

Contracting Officer shall review Contractors’ certifications for compliance. Firms who obtained SOA certification are listed in the SOA website. Not submitting the additional documentation is treated as a responsiveness issue.

Contracting Officer shall ensure that the contract provisions stipulate that the contract may be terminated for default if it is discovered after award that the Contractor failed to meet the certification requirements of D.P.R. n. 34, or art 75 of DPR 554, and DPR 412/2000.

5. ANTI-MAFIA LAW

Pre-Award Effect of Anti-Mafia Procedures: Inasmuch as the work of this solicitation is to be performed on land owned by the Italian State, the prospective contractor will be subject to all Italian legislation concerning anti-mafia documentation, including, without limitation: Legislative Decree no. 159 of September 6, 2011, Decree of the President of the Republic no. 252 of June 3, 1998, Legislative Decree no. 490 of August 8, 1994, Law Decree No.

629 of September 6, 1982, and any subsequent anti-mafia laws, integrations and amendments. Only firms that submit the requested documentation will be considered for award. In the event that prior to award any mafia infiltration attempt is determined by the competent Prefect (Prefetto) against an offeror, pursuant to Art. 4 of Legislative Decree

no. 490/1994, Art. 10 of Decree of the President of the Republic no. 252/1998, or any other anti-mafia law, no award will be made to said offeror. Furthermore, in the event that prior to award any additional information against an offeror is obtained and validated by the government or provided by the competent Prefect (Prefetto) pursuant to Art.

1, Section 7 of Law decree 629/1982, Art. 10, paragraph 9, of Decree of the President of the Republic no. 252/1998, or any other anti-mafia law, the Government may decide, at its sole discretion, that no award will be made to said offeror.

Subcontractors: ALSO, the Offeror is responsible for complying with Italian Anti-Mafia laws with respect to its subcontractors; and, if necessary, requesting additional information regarding attempts of mafia infiltration from a competent Prefect (Prefetto). The Offeror agrees to provide the Government any appropriate documentation that may indicate mafia-collusion, to include, if available, results of any Prefect (Prefetto) investigations. If after award, a competent Prefect (Prefetto) determines that mafia infiltration attempts have occurred with a subcontractor, then the Offeror agrees, if requested by the Government, to promptly terminate the subject subcontract and replace the mafia-colluded subcontractor at its own cost with a compliant company.

Termination: If during the life of this contract, any mafia infiltration attempt is determined by the Government to have occurred or additional information is provided by the Prefect (Prefetto) against any component of the Contractor or any Subcontractor, pursuant to Art. 1, Section 7 of Law Decree 629/1982, Art 4 of Legislative Decree no.

490/1994, Art. 10 of Decree of the President of the Republic no. 252/1998, or any other anti-mafia law, the

Government at its sole discretion may consider this a failure to execute the work and may terminate the contractor's right to proceed with the work under the "Default" clause of this contract.

Documentation Requirements: Contractor shall submit the following:

The offeror SHALL include a “self-declaration” in accordance with DPR 445/2000, stating that “pursuant to any applicable anti-mafia law in force, none of the causes of forfeiture, suspension or prohibition set forth by Art. 67 of the Code exist with regard to all the persons involved in the subject contract.”

This documentation is to be included in your Price Proposal.

6. ENGLISH SPEAKING REPRESENTATIVE

At all times when any performance of the work at the site is being conducted by any employee of the Contractor or his subcontractors, the contractor shall have a representative present on the site capable of explaining the work operations and receiving instructions in the English language. The Contracting Officer shall have the right to determine, without appeal of such decision, whether the proposed representative has sufficient technical and lingual capabilities, and the Contractor shall immediately replace any individual not acceptable to the Contracting Officer.

7. INQUIRIES, PROPOSAL FORMAT AND DUE DATE

All inquiries regarding the Request for Proposal (RFP) shall be submitted electronically to Nicholas Lizotte (Phone (757)322-8123) by e-mail at nicholas.lizotte@navy.mil. Offerors are requested to use the Pre-Proposal Inquiries submittal Form (Attachment D)

The Government does not intend to respond to inquiries submitted less than 5 business days before the proposal receipt date. A response will be published as an amendment to the solicitation.

The technical specifications and design drawings will be provided with the Phase II Amendment

PHASE I Proposals shall be delivered to:

Commander Naval Facilities Engineering Command, Atlantic Building A Mailroom ATTN: ACQ34 Nicholas Lizotte 6506 Hampton Blvd Norfolk, VA 23508-1278.

All PHASE I SUBMITTALS SHALL BE RECEIVED PRIOR TO 2:00 PM (EST), Friday, 19 January 2018.

LATE SUBMITTALS WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED.

Proposal must be clearly marked on the outside of the package with the solicitation number.

ELECTRONIC/FACSIMILE SUBMISSION OF PROPOSALS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED. Only Phase I Proposals will be considered. The date and time for submission of Phase II proposals is to be determined at a later date. A MAXIMUM NUMBER OF FIVE (5) OFFERS WILL BE SELECTED TO SUBMIT PHASE II

PROPOSALS.

PHASE I SUBMISSION:

Non-Price Factors: Offeror shall submit one (1), marked “Original”, 2 CDs and four (4) copies, each in a separate binder with the following characteristics:

_ 8 ½ x 11 format _ 12 point font

_ Include a cover page with Solicitation Number, Solicitation Title, Prime Contractor Name, Address, Phone Number, Fax Number, DUNS, Cage Code, Point of Contact and their phone and email address.

_The non-price proposal should only include information in response to Factors 1, 2, 3, and JV agreement (if applicable). Specific page limitations and Solicitation Submittal Requirements are specified in each factor. PAGES THAT EXCEED THE PAGE LIMITATIONS SHALL NOT BE EVALUATED.

Special Joint Venture (JV) Requirements:

NOTE #1:

FOR THE PURPOSESOF THIS SOLICITATION A JOINT VENTURE (JV) REFERS TO A U.S.-STYLED

FORMAL LEGAL ENTITY IN THE NATURE OF A PARTNERSHIP COMPRISED OF TWO OR MORE

PERSONS OR COMPANIES. EACH JOINT VENTURE MUST PROVIDE ONE (1) NCAGE CODE, ONE

(1) DUNS NUMBER FOR THE JOINT VENTURE AND ONE (1) DUNS NUMBER FOR EACH MEMBER

COMPRISING THE JOINT VENTURE. EACH JOINT VENTURE MUST BE REGISTERED IN SAM

USING THE NAME OF THE JOINT VENTURE.

JV offerors shall provide with their proposal a notarized legal document that establishes the JV. The JV Agreement shall take effect upon the submission of the proposal and remain irrevocable until one (1) year after the work has been finally inspected and accepted by the Government. Submission of the notarized legal document that establishes the JV shall be furnished with the price proposal in its original language version along with a certified English translation of the notarized JV. The Joint Venture must be formed and valid at the time of submission of the proposal. The validated notarized legal document must include language that each member of the JV will be jointly and severally liable for the performance of the whole contract and will be incorporated into the contract award if award is made to the JV.

1. The Joint Venture Agreement shall include, at a minimum, the following:

(a) Name of firms that form the JV and the name of the JV.

(b) Name and title of the corporate officials signing on behalf of each party.

(c) Solicitation number.

(d) Description of the responsibilities in terms of work category for each member (for example:

Firm A performing 100% of ___)

(e) The statement "The composition and structure of the JV will remain unchanged from award to one (1) year after the work has been finally inspected and accepted by the Government.”

(f) Date of issuance of the agreement and notarized signature of the corporate officials signing in behalf of each party.

(g) Statement under oath stating that the Joint Venture (JV) is in compliance at the time of proposal submission with all applicable laws, rules, and regulations. This statement must be signed under oath by all members comprising the Joint Venture.

2. The U.S. Government reserves the right to review the actual JV Agreement to determine its basis and compliance with the applicable laws. Any internal agreements affecting the internal composition of the existing JV and its potential liabilities in relation to the contract (performance guarantee, insurance, etc) will be sent to the Contracting Officer to provide notice of the same. Any change in the composition of the JV will require the JV to formally request a Novation Agreement in accordance with FAR 42.12, which will be approved/disapproved at the discretion of the Contracting Officer.

PHASE II SUBMISSION:

(APPLICABLE ONLY TO THOSE OFFERORS WHO ARE SELECTED TO PROCEED TO PHASE-II OF

THE SOURCE SELECTION PROCESS. DO NOT SUBMIT FACTORS 4, 5, 6 AND PRICE PROPOSAL

INFORMATION IN PHASE I PROPOSALS.)

Non-price Factors: Offeror shall submit one (1) marked “Original”, a CD and four (4) copies, each in a separate three-ring binder with the following characteristics for each project:

_ 8 ½ x 11 format _ 12 point font

_ Include a cover page with Solicitation Number, Solicitation Title, Prime Contractor Name, Address, Phone Number, Fax Number, DUNS, Cage Code, Point of Contact and their phone and email address.

_ This should only include information in response to Factors 4, 5, 6 and Price. Specific page limitations and Solicitation Submittal Requirements are specified in each Factor. PAGES THAT EXCEED THE

PAGE LIMITATIONS SHALL NOT BE EVALUATED.

The evaluation of Phase I factors will be used for an overall evaluation of the offerors proposals and will be carried over into Phase II.

Price:

Offeror shall submit one (1) original, marked “Original”, a CD and one (1) copy, each in a separate binder with the following:

_ SF-1442 and all amendments (SF 30), signed _Completed Schedule B – Offerors should submit prices on the provided Schedule B only _ Documents establishing the Contractor’s responsibility as outlined in the paragraph below

_ Include a cover page with Solicitation Number, Solicitation Title, Prime Contractor Name, Address, Phone Number, Fax Number, DUNS, Cage Code, Point of Contact and their phone and email address.

_The price proposal should only contain information in response to price.

_SOA Certification.

_ Anti-Mafia Law Self-Declaration

Contractor Responsibility: In accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 9.1, the Contracting Officer shall award contracts only to responsible vendors. No purchase or award shall be made unless the Contracting Officer makes an affirmative determination of responsibility. To be determined responsible, a prospective contractor must have adequate financial resources to perform the contract, or the ability to obtain them. The Contracting Officer shall require acceptable evidence of the prospective contractor’s current sound financial status, as well as the ability to obtain required resources if the need arises. In regard to resources, the contractor must be prepared to present acceptable evidence of subcontracts, commitments or explicit arrangements that will be in existence at the time of contract award, to rent, purchase or otherwise acquire the needed facilities, equipment, services, materials, other resources or personnel. Consideration of a prime contractor’s compliance with limitations on subcontracting shall be taken into account for the time period covered by the contract base period or quantities, plus option periods or quantities, if such options are considered when evaluating offers for award. Pursuant to FAR 9.104-4, the Contracting Officer reserves the right to request adequate evidence of responsibility on the part of any prospective subcontractor(s). In the absence of information clearly indicating that the prospective contractor is responsible, the Contracting Officer shall make a determination of non-responsibility. As a minimum requirement, all offerors are requested to submit, as part of the price proposal submissions, the following:

1) Latest three complete fiscal year financial statements for the prime contractor, certified by an independent accounting firm, if practicable, or at least by an authorized officer of the organization (include Balance Sheet and Income Statement).

2) Submit evidence of availability of working/operating capital, which will be used for the performance of the resultant contract. For Joint Venture arrangements, discuss the financial responsibilities among the companies.

3) Point of contact from a bank or any financial institution with which the offeror transacts business.

The Contracting Officer reserves the right to request additional information if needed.

HAND DELIVERIES OF PROPOSALS:

All visitors to the Lafayette River Annex (LRA) who do not have a CAC badge or RAPIDGATE badge must have a background check run by the Naval Station Pass & ID office (Security Department at Commander, Naval Region Mid-Atlantic) and be issued a temporary BDIBS (Defense Biometric Identification System) visitor pass.

Visitors who do not have a CAC or RAPIDGATE badge must complete the attached Visitor Access Pass Request form (Attachment C). Visitors must complete and forward the form directly to the following personnel in the NAVFAC Atlantic Security Department via email:

1. Iris Gholston (757) 322-8116 / Email: iris.gholston@navy.mil

2. Steven K. Anderson (757) 322-8115 / Email: steven.k.anderson@navy.mil

3. Robert Hernandez (757) 322-8044 / Email: robert.hernandez3@navy.mil

Visitors must complete and provide the attached form to the NAVFAC Atlantic Security Department at least five working days prior to their scheduled meeting date to allow ample time to process and complete the background check.

Commercial couriers such as FEDEX, DHL or UPS follow the same visitor procedures listed above and they are required to have a background check if they do not have a CAC badge. Commercial couriers must also have their vehicle inspected at location listed in the attached LRA commercial vehicle inspection procedures prior to accessing the LRA.

Offerors should check with their intended courier to ensure they have the proper identification credentials to access the LRA.

DBIDS passes must be picked up by the approved visitor from the Naval Station Pass and ID Office located at the following address prior to visiting NAVFAC Atlantic on LRA:

Address: Naval Station Pass and ID Office 9040 Hampton Blvd Norfolk, VA 23505 Telephone Number: 757-322-2975 Hours of Operation: 0700-1530 on Monday through Friday

8. EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

1. Factors 1-3 will be evaluated in Phase I, and Factors 4-6 will be evaluated in Phase II. Factor 1 will only be rated Acceptable or Unacceptable. If an Offeror is rated Unacceptable in Factor 1, then they will not be considered for Phase II. In making the best value award decision after Phase II, the government will consider Factors 2-6 and price.

The solicitation requires the evaluation of price and the following non-price factors:

Phase I:

Factor 1 – Technical Approach Factor 2 – Corporate Experience Factor 3 – Past Performance

The distinction between experience and past performance is that experience pertains to the types or work and volume of work completed by a contractor that are comparable to the types of work described under the definition of recent, relevant projects, in terms of size, scope, and complexity. Past performance pertains to both the relevance of recent efforts and how well a contractor has performed on the contracts.

Phase II:

Factor 4 – Safety Factor 5 – Technical Solution Factor 6 – Energy and Sustainable Design

2. The relative order of importance of the non-price evaluation factors is the technical factors (Factors 2, 4, 5 and 6) are of equal importance to each other and, when combined are equal in importance to the past performance evaluation/performance confidence assessment factor (Factor 3). When the proposal is evaluated as a whole, the technical factors and past performance/performance confidence assessment factor combined (i.e., the non-price evaluation factors) are approximately equal to price.

The importance of price will increase if the Offerors’ non-price proposals are considered essentially equal in terms of overall quality, or if price is so high as to significantly diminish the value of a non-price proposal’s superiority to the Government. Award will be made to the responsible Offeror(s) whose offer conforms to the solicitation and represents the best value to the Government, price and non-price factors considered.

3. Basis of Evaluation and Submittal Requirements for each factor.

Factor 1 – Technical Approach:

(a) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The composition and management of the firms proposed as the design-build (DB) team for this contract will be evaluated in this factor.

The Offeror shall submit the following information:

(1) Provide a narrative describing the proposed primary construction firms and primary design firms for this contract and the rationale for proposing this arrangement. Provide the role, responsibilities, and contractual relationships between the various firms (see FAR Subpart 9.6). The narrative shall also include a simple organizational chart that clearly identifies the lines of authority between the entities. If the experience of an entity is being claimed in Factor 2, that entity must be named in the above narrative and organizational chart.

The technical approach narrative shall be limited to two (2) double-sided page (or four (4) single-sided pages) including the organizational chart. The document(s) requested in item #2 below (JV agreement, etc.)

are not included in this page limitation.

(2) In addition to the narrative, the Offeror shall submit a signed copy of a joint venture agreement, partnership agreement, teaming agreement, approved mentor protégé agreement (MPA), or letter of commitment for each member of the Offeror’s team identified above (e.g., joint venture member, partner, team member, subcontractor, parent company, subsidiary, or other affiliated company, etc.).

(b) Basis of Evaluation:

The assessment of the Offeror’s technical approach will be used as a means to evaluate the organizational structure and teaming relationships proposed by the Offeror. This factor will be rated on an Acceptable or Unacceptable basis. A failure of the offeror to provide a narrative describing the proposed primary construction firms and primary design firms for this contract and the rationale for proposing this arrangement, providing the role, responsibilities, and contractual relationships between the various firms, providing an organizational chart, or providing a joint venture agreement (if applicable) will be rated Unacceptable. Offerors that are rated Unacceptable will be found ineligible to proceed to Phase II.

Factor 2 – Experience:

(a) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The Offeror shall submit the following information:

(1) Construction Experience:

Submit a maximum of five (5) relevant construction projects for the Offeror that best demonstrates your experience on relevant projects that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to the RFP. For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as a new building that is a minimum of 5,000-Square Meters (53,800-Square Feet).

As a minimum requirement, at least two (2) relevant construction projects shall demonstrate experience with construction for the United States Department of Defense.

Furthermore, as an additional minimum requirement, at least (1) relevant construction project shall demonstrate experience with construction of an indoor training pool.

Projects submitted for the Offeror shall be completed within the past ten (10) years of the date of issuance of this RFP.

A project is defined as a construction project performed under a single task order or stand-alone contract.

For multiple award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project; rather Offerors shall submit the work performed under a task order as a project.

The attached Construction & Design Experience Project Data Sheets (Attachment A) is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information. If the same project is being used to demonstrate construction and design experience, submit separate Project Data Sheets for construction and design. Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form.

Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed one (1) double-sided page (or two (2) single-sided pages).

For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP (i.e.: unique features, area, construction methods).

In addition, the description should also address any sustainable features for the project, including specific descriptions of those features. Provide applicable documentation on projects that were validated and/or certified through U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) or the equivalent organization or process.

If the Offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), relevant project experience should be submitted for projects completed by the Joint Venture entity. If the Joint Venture does not have shared experience, projects may be submitted for the Joint Venture members. Offerors who fail to submit experience for all Joint Venture members may be rated lower. Offerors are still limited to a total of five (5) projects combined.

If an Offeror is utilizing experience information of affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies (name is not exactly as stated on the SF1442), the proposal shall clearly demonstrate the manner in which the affiliate/subsidiary/parent firm will have meaningful involvement in the performance of the contract and the entity must be identified as a member of the team in factor 1.

The Offeror may utilize experience of a subcontractor that will perform major or critical aspects of the requirement to demonstrate construction experience under this evaluation factor. The Offer must provide a letter of commitment and an explanation of the meaningful involvement that the subcontractor will have in performance of this contract and the entity must be identified as a member of the team in factor 1. More weight may be given to projects completed by the Offeror than to those completed by proposed subcontractors.

(2) Design Experience

Submit a maximum of five (5) relevant design projects for the design team that best demonstrates design experience on relevant projects that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to the RFP. For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as a new building that is a minimum of 5,000-Square Meters (53,800-Square Feet).

As a minimum requirement, at least two (2) relevant design projects shall demonstrate experience with construction for the United States Department of Defense.

Furthermore, as an additional minimum requirement, at least (1) relevant design project shall demonstrate experience with construction of a training pool.

Projects submitted for the Offeror shall be completed within the past ten (10) years of the date of issuance of this RFP. For design-build projects, the design portion of the contract shall have been completed within the past ten (10) years of the date of issuance of this RFP.

A project is defined as a complete design effort performed under a single task order or stand-alone contract/subcontract. For multiple award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project; rather Offerors shall submit the work performed under a task order as a project.

The attached Construction & Design Experience Project Data Sheet (Attachment A) is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information. If the same project is being used to demonstrate construction and design experience, submit separate Project Data Sheets for construction and design. Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form.

Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed one (1) double-sided page (or two (2) single-sided pages).

For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP (i.e.: unique features, area, construction methods).

In addition, the description should also address any sustainable features for the project, including specific descriptions of those features. Provide applicable documentation on projects that were validated and/or certified through U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC) or the equivalent organization or process.

If an Offeror is utilizing experience information of affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies (name is not exactly as stated on the SF1442), the proposal shall clearly demonstrate the manner in which the affiliate/subsidiary/parent firm will have meaningful involvement in the performance of the contract and the entity must be identified as a member of the team in factor 1.

The Offeror may utilize experience of a design subcontractor to demonstrate design experience under this evaluation factor. The Offer must provide a supporting joint venture agreement, partnership agreement, teaming agreement, or letter of commitment and an explanation of the meaningful involvement for the design subcontractor and the entity must be identified as a member of the team in Factor 1. Offerors proposing multiple design firms should submit relevant project experience for all design firms. Failure to do so may result in a lower rating. More weight may be given to projects completed by the Offeror than to those completed by proposed subcontractors.

(b) Basis of Evaluation:

The basis of evaluation will include the Offeror’s demonstrated experience and depth of experience in performing relevant construction and design projects as defined in the solicitation submittal requirements.

The assessment of the Offeror’s relevant experience will be used as a means of evaluating the capability of the Offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP. The Government will only review five (5) projects for construction and five (5) for design. Any projects submitted in excess of the five (5) for Construction Experience and five (5) for Design Experience will not be considered.

The Offeror may be considered more favorably in the following circumstances:

Relevant projects where the Offeror and the proposed design firm(s) have previously worked together may be considered more favorably than those that have not worked together.

Relevant projects that demonstrate design-build experience may be considered more favorably than those that do not have design-build experience.

Relevant projects that are constructed in Italy may be considered more favorably than those that do not demonstrate this experience.

Relevant projects that demonstrate experience for the Unified Facility Criteria (UFCs) may be considered more favorably than those that do not demonstrate this experience.

Relevant projects that demonstrate experience with sustainable features may be considered more favorably than those that do not demonstrate experience with sustainable features.

Factor 3 – Past Performance:

If a completed Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) evaluation is available, it shall be submitted with the proposal for each project included in Factor 2 for construction experience. If a completed AE Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) evaluation is available, it shall be submitted with the proposal for each project included in Factor 2 for design experience. If there is not a completed CPARS evaluation then submit Past Performance Questionnaires (Attachment B) for each project included in Factor 2 for both Construction Experience and Design Experience. The Offeror should provide completed Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ) in the proposal. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation. If the Offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the Offeror shall complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ, which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). The Government may make reasonable attempts to contact the client noted for that project(s) to obtain the PPQ information. However, Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to help ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government’s point of contact, Nicholas Lizotte via email at nicholas.lizotte@navy.mil.

Offerors may provide any information on problems encountered and the corrective actions taken on projects submitted under Factor 2 – Experience. Offerors may also address any adverse past performance issues.

Explanations shall not exceed two (2) double-sided pages (or four (4) single-sided pages) in total.

The Government reserves the right to contact references for verification or additional information. The Government’s inability to contact any of the Offeror’s references or the references unwillingness to provide the information requested may affect the Government’s evaluation of this factor.

Performance award or additional information submitted will not be considered.

(b) Basis of Evaluation:

This evaluation will consider how well the Offeror’s team performed on relevant projects submitted under Factor 2 – Experience and may also consider past performance on other projects currently documented in known sources.”

The Government will consider the recency and relevance of the information, the source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in the Contractor’s performance. This evaluation is separate and distinct from the Contracting Officer’s responsibility determination. The assessment of the Offeror’s team’s past performance will be used as a means of evaluating the Offeror’s team’s probability to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP.

Offerors lacking relevant past performance history will receive a NEUTRAL Confidence rating.

Factor 4 – Safety

The Offeror shall submit the following information: (For a partnership or joint venture, the following submittal requirements are required for each Contractor who is part of the partnership or joint venture;

however, only one safety narrative is required).

Technical Approach to Safety:

Describe the Offeror’s technical approach to safety for its employees as well as the plan that the Offeror will implement to evaluate and measure safety performance of potential subcontractors as a part of the selection process for all levels of subcontractors. Also, describe innovative methods that the Offeror will employ to ensure and monitor safe work practices at all subcontractor levels. The Safety Narrative which shall include all information requested in this paragraph shall be limited to three pages, 8 ½ x 11 page size (e.g., one (1) double-sided page plus one (1) single-sided page; or three (3) single-sided pages).

Safety Awards:

Submit any awards received for construction safety for construction projects included in Factor 2- Experience. Awards submitted for construction projects included in Factor 2 will not be counted toward the page limit for this Factor.

(b) Basis of Evaluation:

The Government is seeking to determine that the Offeror has consistently demonstrated a commitment to safety and that the Offeror plans to properly manage and implement safety procedures for itself and its subcontractors. The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s overall safety record, the Offeror’s plan to select and monitor subcontractors, and any innovative safety methods that the Offeror plans to implement for this procurement.