Amend 0007 - N40085-26-R-9044 HP135.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICA ON NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicble)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FACILITY CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICIATION NO.

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a)By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment your desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPIRATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

15C. DATE SIGNED

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)

CODE

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

Previous edition unusable

1 1

AMENDMENT NO. 0007 08/05/26 25-0011

N40085

NAVFAC Mid-Atlantic Resident Officer in Charge of Construction 1107A Birch Street Camp Lejeune, NC 28547-2521

See Item 6

✘ N40085-26-R-9044

06/18/26

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

25-0011, Repair BEQ HP135 Amendment 0007, Provide answers to RFI, update Wage Determination NC20260010 Building 07/28/2026, and update Hazardous Materials Survey.

The time and date for receipt of proposals remain unchanged.

This amendment should be acknowledged when your proposal is submitted. Failure to acknowledge the amendment may constitute grounds for rejection of a proposal.

See Continuation Page(s) Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

N40085-26-R-9044 Amendment 0007

CONTINUATION SHEET

1. QUESTION: ECS report identifies 8,000 sf of flooring with mastic. ECS figures and test results show that this flooring with AB mastic is in all sleeping quarters which is more like 30,000 sf. Original Gov’t reports states approx.. 37,000 sf. I think we need clarification as the information is there just wrong quantity from ECS, could turn into a challenge if we went for a

CO.

ANSWER: Total quantity of floor tile and mastic was limited to the sleeping quarters, approximately 21,000. The discrepancy appears to have resulted from earlier quantity assumptions rather than testing data. The contractor is responsible for verifying actual quantities in relation to the scope of work.

2. QUESTION: Do you anticipate disturbing the roofing materials in the attic, if so, I need a quantity. We did a similar barrack a few years ago, didn’t include the roofing but ended up doing a CO’s to GC, some minor abatement due to renovation requirements.

ANSWER: Abatement requirements depend on modifications to the existing roof system as defined in the contract documents. Abatement is not anticipated where previously abated anchor or attachment locations are reused; ACM roofing must be removed where new anchors or penetrations are introduced. The contractor is responsible for determining quantities, including impacts from new work including but not limited to plumbing, electrical, mechanical penetrations, and attic access hatch replacement, etc.

3. All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

General Decision Number: NC20260010 07/28/2026

State: North Carolina

Construction Types: Building

Counties: North Carolina Counties of

Onslow

Modification Number Publication Date

1 05/08/2026

2 07/28/2026

IRON0848-003 07/01/2025

Rates Fringes

IRONWORKER........................................$ 29.75 18.00

PLUM0421-006 07/01/2023

Rates Fringes

PIPEFITTER........................................$ 33.96 13.48

SUNC2018-010 08/08/2023

Rates Fringes

TRUCK DRIVER: DUMP TRUCK.........................$ 15.98 2.93

SHEET METAL WORKER................................$ 19.67 13.27

ROOFER............................................$ 18.26 4.38

PLUMBER...........................................$ 23.11 0.00

PAINTER...........................................$ 15.55 1.05

OPERATOR: ROLLER.................................$ 15.31 1.46

OPERATOR: GRADER/BLADE...........................$ 22.68 3.27

OPERATOR: FORKLIFT...............................$ 16.75 0.00

OPERATOR: BULLDOZER..............................$ 17.54 2.63

OPERATOR: BACKHOE/EXCAVATOR/TRACKHOE.............$ 21.00 2.89

LABORER: PIPELAYER...............................$ 16.33 3.11

LABORER: MASON TENDER - CEMENT/CONCRETE..........$ 15.26 0.00

LABORER: MASON TENDER - BRICK....................$ 13.17 0.00

LABORER: COMMON OR GENERAL.......................$ 11.98 0.81

FORM WORKER.......................................$ 14.51 1.88

ELECTRICIAN.......................................$ 22.15 5.93

CEMENT MASON/CONCRETE FINISHER....................$ 16.72 0.00

CARPENTER, EXCLUDES FORM WORK.....................$ 18.11 2.63

BRICKLAYER........................................$ 19.13 0.00

WELDERS - Receive rate prescribed for craft performing operation to which welding is incidental.

Note: Executive Order (EO) 13706, Establishing Paid Sick Leave for Federal Contractors applies to all contracts subject to the

Davis-Bacon Act for which the contract is awarded (and any solicitation was issued) on or after January 1, 2017. If this contract is covered by the EO, the contractor must provide employees with 1 hour of paid sick leave for every 30 hours they work, up to 56 hours of paid sick leave each year.

Employees must be permitted to use paid sick leave for their own illness, injury or other health-related needs, including preventive care; to assist a family member (or person who is like family to the employee) who is ill, injured, or has other health-related needs, including preventive care; or for reasons resulting from, or to assist a family member (or person who is like family to the employee) who is a victim of, domestic violence, sexual assault, or stalking. Additional information on contractor requirements and worker protections under the EO is available at https://www.dol.gov/agencies/whd/government-contracts.

Note: Executive Order 13658 generally applies to contracts subject to the Davis-Bacon Act that were awarded on or between

January 1, 2015 and January 29, 2022, and that have not been renewed or extended on or after January 30, 2022. Executive

Order 13658 does not apply to contracts subject only to the

Davis-Bacon Related Acts regardless of when they were awarded.

If a contract is subject to Executive Order 13658, the contractor must pay all covered workers at least $13.30 per hour (or the applicable wage rate listed on this wage determination, if it is higher) for all hours spent performing on the contract in 2025. The applicable Executive Order minimum wage rate will be adjusted annually. Additional information on contractor requirements and worker protections under Executive Order 13658 is available at www.dol.gov/whd/govcontracts .

Unlisted classifications needed for work not included within the scope of the classifications listed may be added after award only as provided in the labor standards contract clauses

(29CFR 5.5 (a) (1) (iii)).

The body of each wage determination lists the classifications and wage rates that have been found to be prevailing for the type(s) of construction and geographic area covered by the wage determination. The classifications are listed in alphabetical order under rate identifiers indicating whether the particular rate is a union rate (current union negotiated rate), a survey rate, a weighted union average rate, a state adopted rate, or a supplemental classification rate.

Union Rate Identifiers

A four-letter identifier beginning with characters other than

SU, UAVG, SA, or SC denotes that a union rate was prevailing for that classification in the survey. Example:

PLUM0198-005 07/01/2024. PLUM is an identifier of the union whose collectively bargained rate prevailed in the survey for this classification, which in this example would be Plumbers.

0198 indicates the local union number or district council number where applicable, i.e., Plumbers Local 0198. The next number, 005 in the example, is an internal number used in processing the wage determination. The date, 07/01/2024 in the example, is the effective date of the most current negotiated rate.

Union prevailing wage rates are updated to reflect all changes over time that are reported to WHD in the rates in the collective bargaining agreement (CBA) governing the classification.

Union Average Rate Identifiers

The UAVG identifier indicates that no single rate prevailed for those classifications, but that 100% of the data reported for the classifications reflected union rates. EXAMPLE:

UAVG-OH-0010 01/01/2024. UAVG indicates that the rate is a weighted union average rate. OH indicates the State of Ohio.

The next number, 0010 in the example, is an internal number used in producing the wage determination. The date, 01/01/2024 in the example, indicates the date the wage determination was updated to reflect the most current union average rate.

A UAVG rate will be updated once a year, usually in January, to reflect a weighted average of the current rates in the collective bargaining agreements on which the rate is based.

Survey Rate Identifiers

The SU identifier indicates that either a single non-union rate prevailed (as defined in 29 CFR 1.2) for this classification in the survey or that the rate was derived by computing a weighted average rate based on all the rates reported in the survey for that classification. As a weighted average rate includes all rates reported in the survey, it may include both union and non-union rates. Example: SUFL2022-007

6/27/2024. SU indicates the rate is a single non-union prevailing rate or a weighted average of survey data for that classification. FL indicates the State of Florida. 2022 is the year of the survey on which these classifications and rates are based. The next number, 007 in the example, is an internal number used in producing the wage determination. The date, 6/27/2024 in the example, indicates the survey completion date for the classifications and rates under that identifier.

SU wage rates typically remain in effect until a new survey is conducted. However, the Wage and Hour Division (WHD) has the discretion to update such rates under 29 CFR 1.6(c)(1).

State Adopted Rate Identifiers

The SA identifier indicates that the classifications and prevailing wage rates set by a state (or local) government were adopted under 29 C.F.R 1.3(g)-(h). Example: SAME2023-007

01/03/2024. SA reflects that the rates are state adopted. ME refers to the State of Maine. 2023 is the year during which the state completed the survey on which the listed classifications and rates are based. The next number, 007 in the example, is an internal number used in producing the wage determination.

The date, 01/03/2024 in the example, reflects the date on which the classifications and rates under the SA identifier took effect under state law in the state from which the rates were adopted.

WAGE DETERMINATION APPEALS PROCESS

1) Has there been an initial decision in the matter? This can be:

a) a survey underlying a wage determination

b) an existing published wage determination

c) an initial WHD letter setting forth a position on a wage determination matter

d) an initial conformance (additional classification and rate) determination

On survey related matters, initial contact, including requests for summaries of surveys, should be directed to the WHD Branch of Wage Surveys. Requests can be submitted via email to davisbaconinfo@dol.gov or by mail to:

Branch of Wage Surveys

Wage and Hour Division

U.S. Department of Labor

200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20210

Regarding any other wage determination matter such as conformance decisions, requests for initial decisions should be directed to the WHD Branch of Construction Wage Determinations.

Requests can be submitted via email to BCWD-Office@dol.gov or by mail to:

Branch of Construction Wage Determinations

Wage and Hour Division

U.S. Department of Labor

200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20210

2) If an initial decision has been issued, then any interested party (those affected by the action) that disagrees with the decision can request review and reconsideration from the Wage and Hour Administrator (See 29 CFR Part 1.8 and 29 CFR Part 7).

Requests for review and reconsideration can be submitted via email to dba.reconsideration@dol.gov or by mail to:

Wage and Hour Administrator

U.S. Department of Labor

200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20210

The request should be accompanied by a full statement of the interested party's position and any information (wage payment data, project description, area practice material, etc.) that the requestor considers relevant to the issue.

3) If the decision of the Administrator is not favorable, an interested party may appeal directly to the Administrative

Review Board (formerly the Wage Appeals Board). Write to:

Administrative Review Board

U.S. Department of Labor

200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20210.

END OF GENERAL DECISION

ASBESTOS AND LEAD-PAINT SURVEY

REPAIR BEQ HP135

MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJEUNE

JACKSONVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28542

ECS PROJECT NO. 49:26342

FOR: MBF ARCHITECTS PA

AUGUST 4, 2026

Braxton B. Dawson Jenny Clark, REM Environmental Project Manager Associate Environmental Principal bdawson@ecslimited.com jclark@ecslimited.com 910-686-9114 404-640-9257

August 4, 2026 Mr. Bill Faulkenberry MBF Architects PA 317-C Pollock Street New Bern, North Carolina 28560 faulkenberry@mbfarchitects.com

ECS Project No. 49:26342

Reference: Asbestos and Lead-Paint Survey, Repair BEQ HP135, Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune, Jacksonville, North Carolina

Dear Mr. Faulkenberry:

ECS Southeast, LLC (ECS) is pleased to provide MBF Architects PA with the results of the above referenced Asbestos and Lead-Paint Survey performed for the Repair BEQ HP135 project located at Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune in Jacksonville, North Carolina. This report summarizes our observations, analytical results, findings, and recommendations related to the work performed. The work described in this report was performed by ECS in general accordance with the Scope of Services described in ECS Proposal Number 49:50782P and the terms and conditions of the agreement authorizing those services.

ECS appreciates this opportunity to provide MBF Architects PA with our services. If we can be of further assistance to you, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Sincerely, ECS Southeast, LLC

6714 Netherlands Drive, Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 • T:910-686-9114 NC Engineering No. F-1519 NC Geology No. C-553

ECS Florida, LLC • ECS Mid-Atlantic LLC • ECS Midwest, LLC • ECS Pacific, Inc. • ECS Southeast, LLC • ECS Southwest, LLP

ECS New York Engineering, PLLC - An Associate of ECS Group of Companies • ecslimited.com

"ONE FIRM. ONE MISSION."

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The subject property is improved with a Bachelor's Enlisted Quarters located at Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune in Jacksonville, Onslow County, North Carolina. The structure consists of 36,868 square feet and was reportedly originally constructed in 1999. HP140 and HP136 are separate mechanical buildings that service the HP135 building. At the time of our survey, the subject buildings were vacant and are currently scheduled to be renovated.

The purpose of the survey was to determine whether asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) and lead-containing paint (LCP) are present on the subject property. The survey was performed within the interior and exterior areas of the subject buildings as well as the roofs.

Asbestos Survey

On October 8, 2025, Mr. Braxton B. Dawson, an accredited inspector, performed the asbestos assessment. A subsequent destructive sampling scope was performed on February 18, 2026 to determine if the damp-proofing on CMU behind exterior brick veneer contained asbestos. The destructive assessment also included shower pans and vanity mirrors inside the living quarters. Bulk samples were submitted to Scientific Analytical Institute, Inc. (SAI) in Greensboro, North Carolina for analysis via Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) in accordance with the current EPA-600 methodology.

A total of 53 bulk samples from 21 homogeneous areas were submitted to the laboratory, of which 58 layers were analyzed. An additional 6 layers were analyzed from the destructive sampling event.

Based on the laboratory analysis of the bulk samples collected during the survey, several of the materials were reported to contain asbestos greater than one percent (>1%).

The following materials were reported to be asbestos-containing:

• Floor Tile Mastic; 21,000 Square Feet

• Built Up Roofing; 16,000 Square Feet

• Flashing - Top Layer; 1,500 Square Feet

• Flashing - Bottom Layer; 1,500 Square Feet

The following materials were reported to be asbestos-containing from the pre-final destructive sampling event:

• CMU Damp Proofing; behind brick veneer; 21,000 Square Feet

Due to inaccessibility or the destructive means that asbestos sampling requires, unseen ACMs may remain within the building hidden behind inaccessible areas, which include, but are not limited to, sub-grade walls, structural members, topping slabs, sub-grade sealants, flooring located below underlayments, areas behind exterior walls, pipe trenches, and subsurface utilities.

If suspect materials are discovered during construction activities, they should be presumed to contain asbestos and be treated as ACMs or be sampled immediately upon discovery and prior to disturbance for asbestos content by an accredited or certified asbestos inspector in accordance with 29 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 1926.1101.

August 4, 2026 ii

Lead Paint Survey

The lead paint assessment was conducted by the collection of paint chip samples from suspect lead paint materials. The paint chip samples were submitted to a laboratory that participates in the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) Environmental Lead Proficiency Analytical Testing (ELPAT) Program for analysis of lead concentration (percent by weight) using Flame Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy.

Based on the laboratory analysis of the paint chips collected during the survey, one of the surfaces sampled was reported as lead-containing paint.

The following materials were reported to be lead-containing paint:

• Exterior Yellow Stair Riser Paint

Paint and surface coatings that contain detectable concentrations of lead are considered “lead-containing paints.” Since OSHA has no specific action level for lead in paint, all paint on the site found to have a measurable concentration of lead should be assumed to be lead-containing. Work performed that may disturb lead-containing paint is regulated under OSHA, as referenced under 29

CFR 1926.62.

The executive summary is an integral portion of this report; however, ECS recommends that the report be read in its entirety.

iii

PAGETABLE OF CONTENTS

1.0 SITE DESCRIPTION

2.0 PURPOSE

3.0 METHODOLOGY

3.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials

3.2 Lead in Paint and Surface Coatings

4.0 RESULTS

4.1 Asbestos Sampling

4.2 Suspect or Assumed Asbestos-Containing Materials

4.3 Lead in Paint and Surface Coatings

5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS AND REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS

5.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials

5.2 Lead in Paint and Surface Coatings

6.0 LIMITATIONS

iv

TABLE OF APPENDICES

Appendix I: Figures

Appendix II: Site Photographs

Appendix III: Asbestos Bulk Sample Results

Appendix IV: Lead Laboratory Analytical Results

Appendix V: Previous Reports

Appendix VI: Licenses & Certifications v

1.0 SITE DESCRIPTION

The subject property is developed with the three-story Bachelor's Enlisted Quarters (BEQ) building HP135 located at Marine Corps Base (MCB) Hadnot Point area in Jacksonville, Onslow County, North Carolina. Based on the information available, BEQ HP135 comprises approximately 45,695 square feet of space and was reportedly constructed in 1980. HP140 and HP136 are separate mechanical buildings that service HP135. The buildings were vacant at the time of our assessment and are currently slated for interior and exterior renovations. ECS was requested to conduct an asbestos and lead paint survey prior to the proposed renovations.

The building comprises a brick veneer facade, with concrete decking, and an older bituminous built-up roof covered by an A-frame asphalt shingle roof. Interior finishes consist of concrete masonry unit (CMU) block, suspended ceiling tiles, drywall, ceiling texture, vinyl floor tile, and epoxy-coated concrete floors. Mechanical and plumbing systems wer observed to be insulated with spun fiberglass or foam.

2.0 PURPOSE

The purpose of the Asbestos and Lead-Paint Survey was to identify asbestos-containing materials (ACM) and lead-containing paint (LCP) which require special handling and/or disposal if disturbed during construction activities. The identification of ACMs requires trained labor, regulated work practices, and special disposal. The identification of LCP or other lead hazards requires disclosure to contractors and monitoring of lead exposure.

3.0 METHODOLOGY

ECS performed the authorized Scope of Services in general accordance with our proposal, standard industry practice(s) and methods specified by regulation(s) for the identification of ACMs and LCPs.

3.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials

The non-invasive asbestos survey was performed by Mr. Braxton B. Dawson (NC Asbestos Inspector No. 12830) on October 8, 2025. The survey consisted of observing the accessible areas of HP135, HP136 and HP140 for the presence of suspect materials that may contain asbestos. The survey involved detecting both friable materials (materials that can be pulverized or reduced to a powder by hand pressure when dry) and non-friable materials (materials that pose a hazard when sawn, sanded, drilled, or pulverized). Homogeneous materials (based on material type, color, texture, etc.) were identified during the survey. A subsequent destructive sampling scope was performed on February 18, 2026 to determine if the damp-proofing on CMU behind exterior brick veneer contained asbestos.

The destructive assessment also included shower pans and vanity mirrors inside the living quarters.

The EPA National Emissions Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) requires a survey for asbestos before renovation or demolition. Demolition is defined under NESHAP as the removal of a load-bearing structural member, and renovation is an action that disturbs building materials. Based on requirements under NESHAP and the North Carolina Asbestos Hazard Management Program (AHMP), administered by the Health Hazards Control Unit (HHCU) for renovation or demolition activities, ECS conducted a limited survey for potential ACM. The ACM survey was limited in that

August 4, 2026

ECS Project # 49:26342 we did not conduct demolition, such as jack/sledgehammering, to expose potentially concealed materials. Samples were collected in general accordance with Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Standard 40 CFR 763 Subpart E, Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA), and Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Standard 29 CFR 1926.1101 Inspection Protocol.

Representative bulk samples were collected, placed in sealed packages, and submitted to SAI for analysis using the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recommended method of Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) coupled with dispersion staining (Method No. EPA 600/R-93/116). SAI participates in the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP). Their NVLAP accreditation number is 200664-0. Several of the samples were layered and analyzed as multiple samples. EPA regulations require collecting multiple samples of each homogeneous area for laboratory analysis. The material type, sample location, and analytical results of each bulk sample are also summarized in the attached Asbestos Bulk Analysis report in Appendices.

Samples were analyzed using the “Positive Stop” methodology. If one sample of a homogeneous material is reported to contain asbestos, the remaining samples are not analyzed. If one sample of a material from a homogeneous area is reported to contain greater than 1% asbestos, then by EPA definition, it is characterized as an ACM regardless of additional analysis.

During the survey, ECS attempted to identify suspect ACMs in readily accessible areas. However, due to the destructive means required to identify some materials, certain areas were deemed inaccessible (i.e. behind walls or sub-grade materials) and were not surveyed for suspect ACMs.

3.2 Lead in Paint and Surface Coatings

ECS completed a lead paint screening within the buildings as part of our assessment activities. The collection of representative paint chip samples was performed throughout HP135, HP136 and HP140.

Samples collected were containerized, labeled, and transported to SAI. Each of the paint chip samples was subsequently analyzed for the presence of lead, reported in percent lead by weight, via EPA Method SW 846, 7000B (Flame AAS). The chain-of-custody, which includes sample numbers and sample locations, is included in an Appendix of this report.

4.0 RESULTS

The following is a summary of laboratory results, findings and observations.

4.1 Asbestos Sampling

In total, 53 bulk samples from 21 homogeneous areas were submitted to the laboratory, of which 58 layers were analyzed. An additional 4 layers were analyzed from the destructive sampling event.

An ACM is defined as any material containing more than one percent (>1%) asbestos as determined using the method specified in Appendix E, Subpart E, 40 CFR Part 763, Section 1, PLM. The U.S. EPA categorizes ACM as follows:

August 4, 2026

• Friable ACMs are defined as any ACM that, when dry, can be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure. Non-friable ACMs are defined as any ACM that, when dry, cannot be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure.

• Category I non-friable ACM includes packings, gaskets, resilient floor coverings, and asphalt roofing products containing more than one percent (>1%) asbestos.

• Category II non-friable ACM is listed as any material, excluding Category I non-friable ACM, containing more than one percent (>1%) asbestos.

Regulated Asbestos Containing Materials (RACM) are friable ACM or non-friable ACM that will be or has been subjected to sanding, grinding, cutting, or abrading, or has crumbled, been pulverized, or reduced to powder in the course of renovation and/or demolition operations.

SAI submitted the signed final laboratory reports to ECS on October 13, 2025 and February 25, 2026.

Several of the bulk samples submitted for analysis were reported to contain asbestos in detectable concentrations. A complete list of the sampled materials submitted for analysis and sample locations is included in the table below. Photographs of representative building materials are located in Appendix II of this report.

Asbestos Bulk Sample Locations and Analysis Results

Sample ID Material

Description Sample

Location Analytical

Results Category Quantity

First Sampling Event

135-01-1,2 Beige Floor Tile & Black Mastic

Throughou t Living Quarters

Tile - None Detected Mastic - 3% Chrysotile

Cat I 21,000 Sq.

Ft.

135-02-1,2,3 White Canvas TSI Wrap

Chases None Detected

(ND)

Not Applicable (N/A)

N/A

135-03-1,2 Tan HVAC Duct Mastic

Living Quarters

ND N/A N/A

135-04-1,2 Drywall & Joint Compound

Living Quarters' Ceilings

ND N/A N/A

135-05-1,2 Pinhole & Fissure Ceiling Tile

All Lounges & Hallways

ND N/A N/A

135-06-1,2 Pinhole Ceiling Tile

Duty Offices ND N/A N/A

August 4, 2026

Sample ID Material

Description Sample

Location Analytical

Results Category Quantity

135-07-1,2 Floor Coating

Common Areas

ND N/A N/A

135-08-1,2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7

Block Coating

Interior CMU Walls

ND N/A N/A

135-09-1,2 Expansion Joint Caulk

Exterior Expansion Joints

ND N/A N/A

135-10-1,2 Fire Caulk Exterior Mechanical Rooms

ND N/A N/A

135-11-1,2 Gray HVAC Duct Mastic

Attic ND N/A N/A

135-12-1,2 Shingles Attic ND N/A N/A

135-13-1,2 Tar Paper Underlayme nt

Attic ND N/A N/A

135-14-1,2 Built Up Roof

Center of Attic

4% Chrysotile

Cat I 16,000 Sq.

Ft.

135-15-1,2 Flashing - Top Layer

Parapet Wall - Attic

8% Chrysotile

Cat I 1,500 Sq. Ft.

135-16-1,2 Flashing - Bottom Layer

Parapet Wall - Attic

5% Chrysotile

Cat I 1,500 Sq. Ft.

135-17-1,2, 3,4,5,6,7

Ceiling Texture

Living Quarters & Exterior Mechanical Rooms

ND N/A N/A

135-18-1,2 Tile Grout Mechanical Rooms, Shower Walls

ND N/A N/A

135-19-1,2 Expansion Joint Caulk

Interior Expansion Joints

ND N/A N/A

August 4, 2026

Sample ID Material

Description Sample

Location Analytical

Results Category Quantity

135-20-1,2 Roofing Mechanical Building

HP140

ND N/A N/A

135-21-1,2 Caulk Doors of

HP140

ND N/A N/A

Pre-Final Destructive Sampling Event

135-1-1,2 Damp-Proo fing Mastic

Exterior Behind Brick Veneer

8% Chrysotile

Cat II 21,000 Sq.

Ft.

135-2-1,2 Pink Waterproofi ng Sealant

Living Quarters Shower Pans

ND ND N/A

Bold = Asbestos-Containing Materials

4.2 Suspect or Assumed Asbestos-Containing Materials

Due to the inaccessibility or the destructive means that asbestos sampling requires, additional suspect ACMs may remain within the building hidden behind inaccessible areas that include but are not limited to, sub-grade walls, structural members, topping slabs, sub-grade sealants, flooring located below underlayments, areas behind exterior walls, pipe trenches, and subsurface utilities, etc.

These areas were deemed inaccessible and were not assessed.

If these materials are discovered during construction activities, they should be presumed to contain asbestos and be treated as ACMs or sampled immediately upon discovery and prior to disturbance for asbestos content by a certified asbestos inspector in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.1101.

A subsequent destructive sampling scope was performed by ECS and MBF Architects on February 18, 2026 to determine if damp-proofing on CMU behind exterior brick veneer contained asbestos. The destructive assessment also included shower pans and vanity mirrors inside the living quarters. The results of the destructive testing are as followed:

• ACM damp-proofing black mastic was identified on CMU walls behind the exterior brick veneer.

• The shower pan membrane and mastic in the private bathrooms were negative for asbestos.

• The vanity mirrors in the living quarters were determined to be mechanically fastened.

Mirror mastic was not observed.

August 4, 2026

4.3 Lead in Paint and Surface Coatings

Lead-based paint is defined by the U.S. EPA and North Carolina as any paint or other surface coatings that contain lead equal to or in excess of 1.0 mg/cm2 or 0.5% by weight.

Paint and surface coatings that contain detectable concentrations of lead are considered to be “lead-containing paints” (LCP). Because OSHA has no specific action level for lead in paint, all paint on the site found to have measurable lead concentrations should be assumed to be lead-containing.

Work performed that may disturb lead-containing paint is regulated under OSHA, as referenced under 29 CFR 1926.62.

Lead was detected in the yellow stair riser paint chip sample analyzed. The identified lead-containing paint is summarized in the table below, and the photographs are located in the appendix.

Summary Paint Chip Sampling Results

Sample ID Location Substrate Component Condition Color Result

PC-1 Interior Lounges

CMU Wall Intact White <0.0059%

PC-2 Interior Common Areas

Metal Door Intact White <0.0042%

PC-3 Interior Common Areas

Metal Door Frames

Intact White <0.0055%

PC-4 Lounge - Storage Closets

Wood Double Doors

Intact Beige <0.0039%

PC-5 Lounge - Storage Closets

Metal Double Door Frame

Intact Beige <0.0054%

PC-6 HP136 -

Mech Building

Metal Double Doors

Intact Brown <0.0055%

PC-7 HP136 -

Mech Building

Metal Double Door Frames

Intact Brown <0.0071%

PC-8 Exterior Living Quarters Windows

Metal Window/ Door Frame Panels

Intact Brown <0.0058%

August 4, 2026

Sample ID Location Substrate Component Condition Color Result

PC-9 Exterior Living Quarters

Metal Doors Intact Brown <0.0072%

PC-10 Laundry Rooms

Concrete Ceiling Not Intact Beige <0.0058%

PC-11 Interior Living Quarters

Metal Window/ Door Frame Panels

Intact Beige <0.0074%

PC-12 Interior Living Quarters

Metal Doors Intact Beige <0.0062%

PC-13 Living Quarters - Bathroom s

Metal Door Frames

Intact Beige <0.0053%

PC-14 Living Quarters - Bathroom s

Metal Doors Intact Beige <0.0064%

PC-15 Common Areas - Exterior

Metal Door Lintels

Intact Brown <0.0058%

PC-16 Laundry, Mech Rooms, Common Closets

Metal Pipe Intact Red <0.0065%

PC-17 Exterior Stairwell

Concrete Stair Risers

Not Intact

Yellow 1.5%

PC-18 Exterior Mechanic al Rooms

CMU Walls Not Intact Beige <0.0055%

PC-19 Exterior Mechanic al Rooms

Metal Louver Intact Brown <0.0050%

August 4, 2026

Sample ID Location Substrate Component Condition Color Result

PC-20 Living Quarters

Drywall HVAC Enclosure s

Intact Beige <0.0044%

PC-21 Living Quarters

CMU Walls Intact Beige <0.0038%

PC-22 Lounges Metal Door Lintels

Intact White <0.0055%

PC-23 Mechanic al Building

Metal Door Intact Gray <0.0040%

Bold = Lead-Containing Paint

5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS AND REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS

Based on our understanding of the purpose of the Asbestos and Lead-Paint Survey, the results of laboratory analysis, and our findings and observations, ECS presents the following recommendations.

5.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials

ECS recommends where a material type has been identified as asbestos-containing that, other materials with similar color, texture, age, and size throughout the building’s interior and exterior be assumed to contain asbestos. Please refer to Section 4.1 for a complete list of building materials reported positive for asbestos and Section 4.2 for materials assumed to contain asbestos. Identified ACMs must be removed, encapsulated, or enclosed before disturbance of the materials.

If ACMs are to be removed, an accredited asbestos abatement contractor should perform the removal. it is recommended that an industrial hygienist monitor the project. This involves collecting air samples from within and outside abatement work areas to monitor the asbestos abatement contractor’s work practices throughout the project. The industrial hygienist should evaluate if the asbestos abatement work is in accordance with project specifications, U.S. EPA regulation 40 CFR Part 61-NESHAP Subpart M: National Emission Standard for Asbestos, and OSHA regulation 29 CFR

1926.1101 – Asbestos in Construction. The industrial hygienist should assess each work area to monitor the removal of ACMs. Only after the industrial hygienist has determined the identified ACMs have been removed should final clearance air samples be collected (if necessary).

ECS recommends that a project specification be prepared to delineate and quantify known and suspect hazardous and regulated materials in the buildings and to outline proper procedures for the abatement. This will help protect the owner’s liability in better defining the scope of work and contractors’ roles and responsibilities in the abatement process and holding the contractor accountable for the performance of the project. The specification typically defines the Contractor’s scope of work and outline requirements and procedures that must be followed for the project. The

August 4, 2026 intent of the specification is to give performance requirements for the Contractor so that the project can be completed safely and in compliance with applicable federal and state regulations. Typically, the specification document serves as part of the site owner’s contract with the contractor.

Suspect ACMs not observed due to inaccessibility or not sampled due to the destructive means that sampling would require may also be encountered during construction activities. At the time of the survey, only limited destructive means were used to locate or sample suspect ACMs; therefore, additional suspect ACMs may remain within inaccessible areas that include, but are not limited to, [sub-grade walls, structural members, topping slabs, exterior areas, sub-grade sealants, flooring located below underlayments, vapor barriers, pipe trenches, and other subsurface utilities, etc.] If additional suspect ACMs are uncovered which were not accessible during this survey, it is recommended that these materials either be assumed to contain asbestos or be sampled before disturbance upon discovery for asbestos content by an asbestos inspector in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.1101.

5.2 Lead in Paint and Surface Coatings

Based on the findings of the lead survey, detectable concentrations of lead were identified on some paints and surface coatings. The presence of lead is a concern primarily when conditions exist where it may be inhaled or ingested. Regardless of the analytical results of a material, all painted and/or glazed surfaces may still contain concentrations of lead in the paint, which, when disturbed, may generate lead dust greater than the Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) of 50 micrograms per cubic meter (ug/m3) as an 8-hour Time Weighted Average (TWA) established by the OSHA “Lead Exposure in Construction Rule (29 CFR 1926.62).”

The OSHA standard gives no guidance on acceptable levels of lead in paint at which no exposure to airborne lead (above the action level) would be expected. Rather, OSHA defines airborne concentrations and references specific types of work practices and operations from which a lead hazard may be generated (reference 29 CFR 1926.62, section d). Environmental and personnel monitoring should be conducted during any removal/demolition process (as appropriate) to verify that actual personal exposures are below the PEL of 50 µg/m3 as an 8-hour TWA. Under OSHA requirements, the contractor performing renovation work will be required to conduct this monitoring and follow applicable requirements under 29 CFR 1926.62 if disturbing lead-containing paint.

6.0 LIMITATIONS

The conclusions and recommendations presented within this report are based upon a reasonable level of assessment within normal bounds and standards of professional practice for a site in this particular geographic setting. ECS is not responsible or liable for the discovery and elimination of hazards that may potentially cause damage, accidents, or injuries.

The observations, conclusions, and recommendations pertaining to environmental conditions at the subject site are necessarily limited to conditions observed, and/or materials reviewed at the time this study was undertaken. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made with regard to the conclusions and recommendations presented within this report. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the client. This report is not intended to be used or relied upon in connection with other projects or by other unidentified third parties without the written consent of ECS and the client.

August 4, 2026

During this study, samples were submitted for analysis at an accredited laboratory via polarized light microscopy. As with any similar survey of this nature, actual conditions exist only at the precise locations from which samples were collected. Certain inferences are based on the results of this sampling and related testing to form a professional opinion of conditions in areas beyond those from which the samples were collected. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made.

Our recommendations are in part based on federal, state, and local regulations and guidelines. ECS does not assume the responsibility of the person(s) in charge of the site, or otherwise undertake responsibility for reporting to any local, state, or federal public agencies, any conditions at the site that may present a potential danger to public health, safety, or the environment. Under this scope of services, ECS assumes no responsibility regarding any response actions initiated as a result of these findings. General compliance with regulations and response actions are the sole responsibility of the Client and should be conducted in accordance with local, state, and/or federal requirements.

August 4, 2026

Appendix I: Figures

Asbestos & Lead Survey Figure 1

Site Overview

HP135

Camp Lejune

Jacksonville, North Carolina

ECS Project No. 49-26342

IMAGE SOURCE:

Google Earth

Subject Structure

NOTES:

Floor plan not to scale.

Asbestos & Lead Survey Figure 2

Asbestos & Lead Sample Locations

Repair BEQ HP135 Camp Lejune

Jacksonville, North Carolina

ECS Project No. 49-26342

First Floor

135-03-2

Destructive 135-1-1,2

135-01-1 135-17-2

135-17-7

135-08-2

135-07-1

135-02-1

135-17-1

135-08-1

135-19-1

135-05-1

ACM Legend

Black Mastic associated with Beige Floor Tiles

Black Damp Proofing Mastic behind Brick Venner

XX-XX

SAMPLE LEGEND:

Sample Location

Asbestos Not Detected

Asbestos Detected >1%

Lead-Containing Paint

Below Detection Limits

PC-17

PC-5

PC-12

PC-19

PC-22

PC-14

PC-8

Asbestos & Lead Survey Figure 3

Asbestos & Lead Sample Locations

Repair BEQ HP135 Camp Lejune

Jacksonville, North Carolina

ECS Project No. 49-26342

2nd Floor

Destructive 135-2-1,2

135-10-1

135-17-4135-19-2

135-08-4

135-08-3

135-02-2

135-08-5

135-18-1,2

135-17-3

135-10-2

135-04-1

ACM Legend

Black Mastic associated with Beige Floor Tiles

Black Damp Proofing Mastic behind Brick Venner

XX-XX

SAMPLE LEGEND:

Sample Location

Asbestos Not Detected

Asbestos Detected >1%

Lead-Containing Paint

Below Detection Limits

PC-9

PC-11

PC-20

PC-16

PC-1PC-18

PC-13

135-09-2 135-06-1

Asbestos & Lead Survey Figure 4

Asbestos & Lead Sample Locations

Repair BEQ HP135 Camp Lejune

Jacksonville, North Carolina

ECS Project No. 49-26342

3rd Floor

135-01-2

135-07-2

135-08-7

135-05-2

135-04-2 135-17-5

135-03-1135-17-6

135-06-2

135-08-6

135-02-3

PC-21

PC-15

PC-2

PC-10

PC-3

PC-4

ACM Legend

Black Mastic associated with Beige Floor Tiles

Black Damp Proofing Mastic behind Brick Venner

XX-XX

SAMPLE LEGEND:

Sample Location

Asbestos Not Detected

Asbestos Detected >1%

Lead-Containing Paint

Below Detection Limits

135-09-1

Asbestos & Lead Survey Figure 5

Asbestos & Lead Sample Locations

Repair BEQ HP135 Camp Lejune

Jacksonville, North Carolina

ECS Project No. 49-26342

Attic/Roof & Mechanical Buildings

135-12-2

HP140

HP136

XX-XX

SAMPLE LEGEND:

Sample Location

Asbestos Not Detected

Asbestos Detected >1%

Lead-Containing Paint

Below Detection Limits

135-13-1

135-11-2

135-11-1

135-12-1

135-13-2

135-15-2 135-16-2

135-15-1 135-16-1

135-14-2135-14-1

135-21-1,2

135-20-1

135-20-2ACM Legend

Built-up Roofing

Parapet Wall Flashing

PC-6

PC-7

PC-23

Appendix II: Site Photographs

1 - View of HP135.

2 - View of HP 136 - mechanical building.

ECS Project No. 49:26342

3 - View of HP 140.

4 - View of the A-frame shingled roof.

5 - View of the attic.

6 - View of typical common hallways.

7 - Typical lounges.

8 - View of typical laundry rooms.

9 - View of typical duty offices.

10 - View of the typical living quarters.

11 - View of typical private bathrooms.

12 - View of typical common area bathrooms.

13 - View of typical converted mechanical rooms.

14 - 12" floor tiles with ACM black mastic in the living quarters.

15 - ACM Flashing on parapet walls in the attic.

16 - Additional view of ACM flashing.

17 - ACM built-up roofing in the attic.

18 - View of destructive testing location

19 - View of ACM Damp-proofing mastic on CMU behind brick veneer.

20 - View of vanity mirrors (Mechanically Fastened)

21 - View of non-ACM pink waterproofing sealant

Appendix III: Asbestos Bulk Sample Results

Bulk Asbestos Analysis By Polarized Light Microscopy EPA Method: 600/R-93/116 and

40 CFR, Part 763, Subpart E, App.E

Lab Order ID:Attn: 10094038Customer: ECS Southeast, LLP 6714 Netherlands Dr Wilmington, NC 28405

Analysis:

Date Received:

Braxton Dawson Bailey Proctor

PLM

10/09/2025

Project: BEQ HP735 Jacksonville, NC Date Reported: 10/13/2025

Sample ID

Lab Sample ID

Description

Lab Notes Asbestos

Fibrous Components

Non-Fibrous Components Treatment

Attributes

135-01-1 - A

10094038_0001

Beige Floor Tile & Black Mastic

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Dissolved

Beige

Homogeneous tile

135-01-1 - B

10094038_0054

Beige Floor Tile & Black Mastic

3% Chrysotile 97% Other

Non-Fibrous

Dissolved

Black

Homogeneous mastic

135-01-2 - A

10094038_0002

Beige Floor Tile & Black Mastic

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Dissolved

Beige

Homogeneous tile

135-01-2 - B

10094038_0055

Beige Floor Tile & Black Mastic

Not Analyzed mastic

135-02-1 - A

10094038_0003

White Canvas Wrap on Black Fiberglass TSI

None Detected 25% Fiber Glass 75% Other

Fibrous

Ashed

White

Homogeneous wrap

135-02-1 - B

10094038_0056

White Canvas Wrap on Black Fiberglass TSI

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Ashed

Black

Homogeneous insulation

135-02-2 - A

10094038_0004

White Canvas Wrap on Black Fiberglass TSI

None Detected 25% Fiber Glass 75% Other

Fibrous

Ashed

White

Homogeneous wrap

135-02-2 - B

10094038_0057

White Canvas Wrap on Black Fiberglass TSI

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Ashed

Black

Homogeneous insulation

Disclaimer: Due to the nature of the EPA 600 method, asbestos may not be detected in samples containing low levels of asbestos. We strongly recommend that analysis of floor tiles, vermiculite, and/or heterogenous soil samples be conducted by TEM for confirmation of "None Detected" by PLM. This report relates only to the samples tested and may not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of SAI. This report may not be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. government. Analytical uncertainty available upon request. Scientific Analytical Institute participates in the NVLAP Proficiency Testing program.

Unless otherwise noted blank sample correction was not performed. Estimated MDL is 0.1%.

Leo Shaffer (58)

Analyst Approved Signatory

Page 1 of 8P-F-002 r15 1/15/2028 Scientific Analytical Institute, Inc. 4604 Dundas Dr. Greensboro, NC 27407 (336) 292-3888

EPA Method: 600/R-93/116 and

40 CFR, Part 763, Subpart E, App.E

Lab Order ID:Attn: 10094038Customer: ECS Southeast, LLP 6714 Netherlands Dr Wilmington, NC 28405

Analysis:

Date Received:

Braxton Dawson Bailey Proctor

PLM

10/09/2025

Project: BEQ HP735 Jacksonville, NC Date Reported: 10/13/2025

Sample ID

Lab Sample ID

Description

Lab Notes Asbestos

Fibrous Components

Non-Fibrous Components Treatment

Attributes

135-02-3 - A

10094038_0005

White Canvas Wrap on Black Fiberglass TSI

None Detected 25% Fiber Glass 75% Other

Fibrous

Ashed

White

Homogeneous wrap

135-02-3 - B

10094038_0058

White Canvas Wrap on Black Fiberglass TSI

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Ashed

Black

Homogeneous insulation

135-03-1

10094038_0006

Tan HVAC Duct Mastic

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Ashed

Tan

Homogeneous

135-03-2

10094038_0007

Tan HVAC Duct Mastic

None Detected 100% Other

Non-Fibrous

Ashed

Tan

Homogeneous

135-04-1

10094038_0008

Drywall & Joint Compound (Composite)

None Detected 10% Cellulose 90% Other

Non-Fibrous

Crushed

Gray, White

Homogeneous drywall: none detected; joint compound: none detected

135-04-2

10094038_0009

Drywall & Joint Compound (Composite)

None Detected 10% Cellulose 90% Other

Non-Fibrous

Crushed

White, Gray

Homogeneous drywall: none detected; joint compound: none detected

135-05-1

10094038_0010

Pinhole Fissure Ceiling Tile

None Detected 40% 40%

Cellulose Mineral Wool

20% Other

Fibrous

Ashed

Beige

Homogeneous

135-05-2

10094038_0011

Pinhole Fissure Ceiling Tile

None Detected 40% 40%

Cellulose Mineral Wool

20% Other

Fibrous

Ashed

Beige

Homogeneous

Disclaimer: Due to the nature of the EPA 600 method, asbestos may not be detected in samples containing low levels of asbestos. We strongly recommend that analysis of floor tiles, vermiculite, and/or heterogenous soil samples be conducted by TEM for confirmation of "None Detected" by PLM. This report relates only to the samples tested and may not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of SAI. This report may not be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. government. Analytical uncertainty available upon request. Scientific Analytical Institute participates in the NVLAP Proficiency Testing program.

Unless otherwise noted blank sample correction was not performed. Estimated MDL is 0.1%.

Leo Shaffer (58)

Page 2 of 8P-F-002 r15 1/15/2028 Scientific Analytical Institute, Inc. 4604 Dundas Dr. Greensboro, NC 27407 (336) 292-3888

EPA Method: 600/R-93/116 and

40 CFR, Part 763, Subpart E, App.E

Lab Order ID:Attn: 10094038Customer: ECS Southeast, LLP 6714 Netherlands Dr Wilmington, NC 28405

Analysis:

Date Received:

Braxton Dawson Bailey Proctor

PLM

10/09/2025

Project: BEQ HP735 Jacksonville, NC Date Reported: 10/13/2025

Sample ID

Lab Sample ID

Description

Lab Notes Asbestos

Fibrous Components

Non-Fibrous Components Treatment

Attributes

135-06-1

10094038_0012

Pinhole Ceiling Tile

None Detected 40% 40%

Mineral Wool Cellulose

20% Other

Fibrous

Ashed