25-0011 Asbestos and Lead-Paint Survey.pdf
PDF 12 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Repair BEQ HP135
- Solicitation number
- N4008526R9044
About this file
This document is an Asbestos and Lead-Paint Survey Report for Repair Building Equipped Quarters (BEQ) HP135 located at Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune in Jacksonville, North Carolina.
The survey, conducted by ECS Southeast, LLC, identifies asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) and lead-containing paint (LCP) present in the 36,868 square foot structure, originally constructed in 1980. Asbestos sampling was performed on October 8, 2025, with destructive sampling conducted on February 18, 2026. A total of 53 bulk samples from 21 homogeneous areas were analyzed via Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) per EPA-600 methodology. Materials confirmed to contain asbestos (>1%) include: Floor Tile Mastic (8,000 sq ft, 3% Chrysotile); Built Up Roofing (16,000 sq ft, 4% Chrysotile); Flashing Top Layer (1,500 sq ft, 8% Chrysotile); Flashing Bottom Layer (1,500 sq ft, 5% Chrysotile); and CMU Damp Proofing behind brick veneer (21,000 sq ft, 8% Chrysotile). Lead paint analysis of 23 paint chip samples identified one lead-containing surface: Exterior Yellow Stair Riser Paint (1.5% lead by weight). The report recommends that all identified ACMs be removed by accredited asbestos abatement contractors under industrial hygienist supervision, with project specifications prepared to delineate hazardous materials and outline proper abatement procedures in compliance with EPA 40 CFR Part 61-NESHAP Subpart M and OSHA 29 CFR 1926.1101.
View the file
Other files
Show all 22
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ASBESTOS AND LEAD-PAINT SURVEY
REPAIR BEQ HP135
MARINE CORPS BASE CAMP LEJEUNE
JACKSONVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA 28542
ECS PROJECT NO. 49:26342
FOR: MBF ARCHITECTS PA
APRIL 1, 2026
Braxton B. Dawson Jenny Clark, REM Environmental Project Manager Associate Environmental Principal bdawson@ecslimited.com jclark@ecslimited.com 910-686-9114 404-640-9257
April 1, 2026 Mr. Bill Faulkenberry MBF Architects PA 317-C Pollock Street New Bern, North Carolina 28560 faulkenberry@mbfarchitects.com
ECS Project No. 49:26342
Reference: Asbestos and Lead-Paint Survey, Repair BEQ HP135, Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune, Jacksonville, North Carolina
Dear Mr. Faulkenberry:
ECS Southeast, LLC (ECS) is pleased to provide MBF Architects PA with the results of the above referenced Asbestos and Lead-Paint Survey performed for the Repair BEQ HP135 project located at Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune in Jacksonville, North Carolina. This report summarizes our observations, analytical results, findings, and recommendations related to the work performed. The work described in this report was performed by ECS in general accordance with the Scope of Services described in ECS Proposal Number 49:50782P and the terms and conditions of the agreement authorizing those services.
ECS appreciates this opportunity to provide MBF Architects PA with our services. If we can be of further assistance to you, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely, ECS Southeast, LLC
6714 Netherlands Drive, Wilmington, North Carolina 28405 • T:910-686-9114 NC Engineering No. F-1519 NC Geology No. C-553
ECS Florida, LLC • ECS Mid-Atlantic LLC • ECS Midwest, LLC • ECS Pacific, Inc. • ECS Southeast, LLC • ECS Southwest, LLP
ECS New York Engineering, PLLC - An Associate of ECS Group of Companies • ecslimited.com
"ONE FIRM. ONE MISSION."
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The subject property is improved with a Bachelor's Enlisted Quarters located at Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune in Jacksonville, Onslow County, North Carolina. The structure consists of 36,868 square feet and was reportedly originally constructed in 1999. HP140 and HP136 are separate mechanical buildings that service the HP135 building. At the time of our survey, the subject buildings were vacant and are currently scheduled to be renovated.
The purpose of the survey was to determine whether asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) and lead-containing paint (LCP) are present on the subject property. The survey was performed within the interior and exterior areas of the subject buildings as well as the roofs.
Asbestos Survey
On October 8, 2025, Mr. Braxton B. Dawson, an accredited inspector, performed the asbestos assessment. A subsequent destructive sampling scope was performed on February 18, 2026 to determine if the damp-proofing on CMU behind exterior brick veneer contained asbestos. The destructive assessment also included shower pans and vanity mirrors inside the living quarters. Bulk samples were submitted to Scientific Analytical Institute, Inc. (SAI) in Greensboro, North Carolina for analysis via Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) in accordance with the current EPA-600 methodology.
A total of 53 bulk samples from 21 homogeneous areas were submitted to the laboratory, of which 58 layers were analyzed. An additional 6 layers were analyzed from the destructive sampling event.
Based on the laboratory analysis of the bulk samples collected during the survey, several of the materials were reported to contain asbestos greater than one percent (>1%).
The following materials were reported to be asbestos-containing:
• Floor Tile Mastic; 8,000 Square Feet
• Built Up Roofing; 16,000 Square Feet
• Flashing - Top Layer; 1,500 Square Feet
• Flashing - Bottom Layer; 1,500 Square Feet
The following materials were reported to be asbestos-containing from the pre-final destructive sampling event:
• CMU Damp Proofing; behind brick veneer; 21,000 Square Feet
Due to inaccessibility or the destructive means that asbestos sampling requires, unseen ACMs may remain within the building hidden behind inaccessible areas, which include, but are not limited to, sub-grade walls, structural members, topping slabs, sub-grade sealants, flooring located below underlayments, areas behind exterior walls, pipe trenches, and subsurface utilities.
If suspect materials are discovered during construction activities, they should be presumed to contain asbestos and be treated as ACMs or be sampled immediately upon discovery and prior to disturbance for asbestos content by an accredited or certified asbestos inspector in accordance with 29 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 1926.1101.
April 1, 2026 ii
Lead Paint Survey
The lead paint assessment was conducted by the collection of paint chip samples from suspect lead paint materials. The paint chip samples were submitted to a laboratory that participates in the American Industrial Hygiene Association (AIHA) Environmental Lead Proficiency Analytical Testing (ELPAT) Program for analysis of lead concentration (percent by weight) using Flame Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy.
Based on the laboratory analysis of the paint chips collected during the survey, one of the surfaces sampled was reported as lead-containing paint.
The following materials were reported to be lead-containing paint:
• Exterior Yellow Stair Riser Paint
Paint and surface coatings that contain detectable concentrations of lead are considered “lead-containing paints.” Since OSHA has no specific action level for lead in paint, all paint on the site found to have a measurable concentration of lead should be assumed to be lead-containing. Work performed that may disturb lead-containing paint is regulated under OSHA, as referenced under 29
CFR 1926.62.
The executive summary is an integral portion of this report; however, ECS recommends that the report be read in its entirety.
iii
PAGETABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 SITE DESCRIPTION
2.0 PURPOSE
3.0 METHODOLOGY
3.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials
3.2 Lead in Paint and Surface Coatings
4.0 RESULTS
4.1 Asbestos Sampling
4.2 Suspect or Assumed Asbestos-Containing Materials
4.3 Lead in Paint and Surface Coatings
5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS AND REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS
5.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials
5.2 Lead in Paint and Surface Coatings
6.0 LIMITATIONS
iv
TABLE OF APPENDICES
Appendix I: Figures
Appendix II: Site Photographs
Appendix III: Asbestos Bulk Sample Results
Appendix IV: Lead Laboratory Analytical Results
Appendix V: Previous Reports
Appendix VI: Licenses & Certifications v
1.0 SITE DESCRIPTION
The subject property is developed with the three-story Bachelor's Enlisted Quarters (BEQ) building HP135 located at Marine Corps Base (MCB) Hadnot Point area in Jacksonville, Onslow County, North Carolina. Based on the information available, BEQ HP135 comprises approximately 45,695 square feet of space and was reportedly constructed in 1980. HP140 and HP136 are separate mechanical buildings that service HP135. The buildings were vacant at the time of our assessment and are currently slated for interior and exterior renovations. ECS was requested to conduct an asbestos and lead paint survey prior to the proposed renovations.
The building comprises a brick veneer facade, with concrete decking, and an older bituminous built-up roof covered by an A-frame asphalt shingle roof. Interior finishes consist of concrete masonry unit (CMU) block, suspended ceiling tiles, drywall, ceiling texture, vinyl floor tile, and epoxy-coated concrete floors. Mechanical and plumbing systems wer observed to be insulated with spun fiberglass or foam.
2.0 PURPOSE
The purpose of the Asbestos and Lead-Paint Survey was to identify asbestos-containing materials (ACM) and lead-containing paint (LCP) which require special handling and/or disposal if disturbed during construction activities. The identification of ACMs requires trained labor, regulated work practices, and special disposal. The identification of LCP or other lead hazards requires disclosure to contractors and monitoring of lead exposure.
3.0 METHODOLOGY
ECS performed the authorized Scope of Services in general accordance with our proposal, standard industry practice(s) and methods specified by regulation(s) for the identification of ACMs and LCPs.
3.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials
The non-invasive asbestos survey was performed by Mr. Braxton B. Dawson (NC Asbestos Inspector No. 12830) on October 8, 2025. The survey consisted of observing the accessible areas of HP135, HP136 and HP140 for the presence of suspect materials that may contain asbestos. The survey involved detecting both friable materials (materials that can be pulverized or reduced to a powder by hand pressure when dry) and non-friable materials (materials that pose a hazard when sawn, sanded, drilled, or pulverized). Homogeneous materials (based on material type, color, texture, etc.) were identified during the survey. A subsequent destructive sampling scope was performed on February 18, 2026 to determine if the damp-proofing on CMU behind exterior brick veneer contained asbestos.
The destructive assessment also included shower pans and vanity mirrors inside the living quarters.
The EPA National Emissions Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) requires a survey for asbestos before renovation or demolition. Demolition is defined under NESHAP as the removal of a load-bearing structural member, and renovation is an action that disturbs building materials. Based on requirements under NESHAP and the North Carolina Asbestos Hazard Management Program (AHMP), administered by the Health Hazards Control Unit (HHCU) for renovation or demolition activities, ECS conducted a limited survey for potential ACM. The ACM survey was limited in that
April 1, 2026
ECS Project # 49:26342 we did not conduct demolition, such as jack/sledgehammering, to expose potentially concealed materials. Samples were collected in general accordance with Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Standard 40 CFR 763 Subpart E, Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA), and Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) Standard 29 CFR 1926.1101 Inspection Protocol.
Representative bulk samples were collected, placed in sealed packages, and submitted to SAI for analysis using the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recommended method of Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) coupled with dispersion staining (Method No. EPA 600/R-93/116). SAI participates in the National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP). Their NVLAP accreditation number is 200664-0. Several of the samples were layered and analyzed as multiple samples. EPA regulations require collecting multiple samples of each homogeneous area for laboratory analysis. The material type, sample location, and analytical results of each bulk sample are also summarized in the attached Asbestos Bulk Analysis report in Appendices.
Samples were analyzed using the “Positive Stop” methodology. If one sample of a homogeneous material is reported to contain asbestos, the remaining samples are not analyzed. If one sample of a material from a homogeneous area is reported to contain greater than 1% asbestos, then by EPA definition, it is characterized as an ACM regardless of additional analysis.
During the survey, ECS attempted to identify suspect ACMs in readily accessible areas. However, due to the destructive means required to identify some materials, certain areas were deemed inaccessible (i.e. behind walls or sub-grade materials) and were not surveyed for suspect ACMs.
3.2 Lead in Paint and Surface Coatings
ECS completed a lead paint screening within the buildings as part of our assessment activities. The collection of representative paint chip samples was performed throughout HP135, HP136 and HP140.
Samples collected were containerized, labeled, and transported to SAI. Each of the paint chip samples was subsequently analyzed for the presence of lead, reported in percent lead by weight, via EPA Method SW 846, 7000B (Flame AAS). The chain-of-custody, which includes sample numbers and sample locations, is included in an Appendix of this report.
4.0 RESULTS
The following is a summary of laboratory results, findings and observations.
4.1 Asbestos Sampling
In total, 53 bulk samples from 21 homogeneous areas were submitted to the laboratory, of which 58 layers were analyzed. An additional 4 layers were analyzed from the destructive sampling event.
An ACM is defined as any material containing more than one percent (>1%) asbestos as determined using the method specified in Appendix E, Subpart E, 40 CFR Part 763, Section 1, PLM. The U.S. EPA categorizes ACM as follows:
April 1, 2026
• Friable ACMs are defined as any ACM that, when dry, can be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure. Non-friable ACMs are defined as any ACM that, when dry, cannot be crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder by hand pressure.
• Category I non-friable ACM includes packings, gaskets, resilient floor coverings, and asphalt roofing products containing more than one percent (>1%) asbestos.
• Category II non-friable ACM is listed as any material, excluding Category I non-friable ACM, containing more than one percent (>1%) asbestos.
Regulated Asbestos Containing Materials (RACM) are friable ACM or non-friable ACM that will be or has been subjected to sanding, grinding, cutting, or abrading, or has crumbled, been pulverized, or reduced to powder in the course of renovation and/or demolition operations.
SAI submitted the signed final laboratory reports to ECS on October 13, 2025 and February 25, 2026.
Several of the bulk samples submitted for analysis were reported to contain asbestos in detectable concentrations. A complete list of the sampled materials submitted for analysis and sample locations is included in the table below. Photographs of representative building materials are located in Appendix II of this report.
Asbestos Bulk Sample Locations and Analysis Results
Sample ID Material
Description Sample
Location Analytical
Results Category Quantity
First Sampling Event
135-01-1,2 Beige Floor Tile & Black Mastic
Throughou t Living Quarters
Tile - None Detected Mastic - 3% Chrysotile
Cat I 8,000 Sq. Ft.
135-02-1,2,3 White Canvas TSI Wrap
Chases None Detected
(ND)
Not Applicable (N/A)
N/A
135-03-1,2 Tan HVAC Duct Mastic
Living Quarters
ND N/A N/A
135-04-1,2 Drywall & Joint Compound
Living Quarters' Ceilings
ND N/A N/A
135-05-1,2 Pinhole & Fissure Ceiling Tile
All Lounges & Hallways
ND N/A N/A
135-06-1,2 Pinhole Ceiling Tile
Duty Offices ND N/A N/A
April 1, 2026
Sample ID Material
Description Sample
Location Analytical
Results Category Quantity
135-07-1,2 Floor Coating
Common Areas
ND N/A N/A
135-08-1,2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7
Block Coating
Interior CMU Walls
ND N/A N/A
135-09-1,2 Expansion Joint Caulk
Exterior Expansion Joints
ND N/A N/A
135-10-1,2 Fire Caulk Exterior Mechanical Rooms
ND N/A N/A
135-11-1,2 Gray HVAC Duct Mastic
Attic ND N/A N/A
135-12-1,2 Shingles Attic ND N/A N/A
135-13-1,2 Tar Paper Underlayme nt
Attic ND N/A N/A
135-14-1,2 Built Up Roof
Center of Attic
4% Chrysotile
Cat I 16,000 Sq.
Ft.
135-15-1,2 Flashing - Top Layer
Parapet Wall - Attic
8% Chrysotile
Cat I 1,500 Sq. Ft.
135-16-1,2 Flashing - Bottom Layer
Parapet Wall - Attic
5% Chrysotile
Cat I 1,500 Sq. Ft.
135-17-1,2, 3,4,5,6,7
Ceiling Texture
Living Quarters & Exterior Mechanical Rooms
ND N/A N/A
135-18-1,2 Tile Grout Mechanical Rooms, Shower Walls
ND N/A N/A
135-19-1,2 Expansion Joint Caulk
Interior Expansion Joints
ND N/A N/A
April 1, 2026
Sample ID Material
Description Sample
Location Analytical
Results Category Quantity
135-20-1,2 Roofing Mechanical Building
HP140
ND N/A N/A
135-21-1,2 Caulk Doors of
HP140
ND N/A N/A
Pre-Final Destructive Sampling Event
135-1-1,2 Damp-Proo fing Mastic
Exterior Behind Brick Veneer
8% Chrysotile
Cat II 21,000 Sq.
Ft.
135-2-1,2 Pink Waterproofi ng Sealant
Living Quarters Shower Pans
ND ND N/A
Bold = Asbestos-Containing Materials
4.2 Suspect or Assumed Asbestos-Containing Materials
Due to the inaccessibility or the destructive means that asbestos sampling requires, additional suspect ACMs may remain within the building hidden behind inaccessible areas that include but are not limited to, sub-grade walls, structural members, topping slabs, sub-grade sealants, flooring located below underlayments, areas behind exterior walls, pipe trenches, and subsurface utilities, etc.
These areas were deemed inaccessible and were not assessed.
If these materials are discovered during construction activities, they should be presumed to contain asbestos and be treated as ACMs or sampled immediately upon discovery and prior to disturbance for asbestos content by a certified asbestos inspector in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.1101.
A subsequent destructive sampling scope was performed by ECS and MBF Architects on February 18, 2026 to determine if damp-proofing on CMU behind exterior brick veneer contained asbestos. The destructive assessment also included shower pans and vanity mirrors inside the living quarters. The results of the destructive testing are as followed:
• ACM damp-proofing black mastic was identified on CMU walls behind the exterior brick veneer.
• The shower pan membrane and mastic in the private bathrooms were negative for asbestos.
• The vanity mirrors in the living quarters were determined to be mechanically fastened.
Mirror mastic was not observed.
April 1, 2026
4.3 Lead in Paint and Surface Coatings
Lead-based paint is defined by the U.S. EPA and North Carolina as any paint or other surface coatings that contain lead equal to or in excess of 1.0 mg/cm2 or 0.5% by weight.
Paint and surface coatings that contain detectable concentrations of lead are considered to be “lead-containing paints” (LCP). Because OSHA has no specific action level for lead in paint, all paint on the site found to have measurable lead concentrations should be assumed to be lead-containing.
Work performed that may disturb lead-containing paint is regulated under OSHA, as referenced under 29 CFR 1926.62.
Lead was detected in the yellow stair riser paint chip sample analyzed. The identified lead-containing paint is summarized in the table below, and the photographs are located in the appendix.
Summary Paint Chip Sampling Results
Sample ID Location Substrate Component Condition Color Result
PC-1 Interior Lounges
CMU Wall Intact White <0.0059%
PC-2 Interior Common Areas
Metal Door Intact White <0.0042%
PC-3 Interior Common Areas
Metal Door Frames
Intact White <0.0055%
PC-4 Lounge - Storage Closets
Wood Double Doors
Intact Beige <0.0039%
PC-5 Lounge - Storage Closets
Metal Double Door Frame
Intact Beige <0.0054%
PC-6 HP136 -
Mech Building
Metal Double Doors
Intact Brown <0.0055%
PC-7 HP136 -
Mech Building
Metal Double Door Frames
Intact Brown <0.0071%
PC-8 Exterior Living Quarters Windows
Metal Window/ Door Frame Panels
Intact Brown <0.0058%
April 1, 2026
Sample ID Location Substrate Component Condition Color Result
PC-9 Exterior Living Quarters
Metal Doors Intact Brown <0.0072%
PC-10 Laundry Rooms
Concrete Ceiling Not Intact Beige <0.0058%
PC-11 Interior Living Quarters
Metal Window/ Door Frame Panels
Intact Beige <0.0074%
PC-12 Interior Living Quarters
Metal Doors Intact Beige <0.0062%
PC-13 Living Quarters - Bathroom s
Metal Door Frames
Intact Beige <0.0053%
PC-14 Living Quarters - Bathroom s
Metal Doors Intact Beige <0.0064%
PC-15 Common Areas - Exterior
Metal Door Lintels
Intact Brown <0.0058%
PC-16 Laundry, Mech Rooms, Common Closets
Metal Pipe Intact Red <0.0065%
PC-17 Exterior Stairwell
Concrete Stair Risers
Not Intact
Yellow 1.5%
PC-18 Exterior Mechanic al Rooms
CMU Walls Not Intact Beige <0.0055%
PC-19 Exterior Mechanic al Rooms
Metal Louver Intact Brown <0.0050%
April 1, 2026
Sample ID Location Substrate Component Condition Color Result
PC-20 Living Quarters
Drywall HVAC Enclosure s
Intact Beige <0.0044%
PC-21 Living Quarters
CMU Walls Intact Beige <0.0038%
PC-22 Lounges Metal Door Lintels
Intact White <0.0055%
PC-23 Mechanic al Building
Metal Door Intact Gray <0.0040%
Bold = Lead-Containing Paint
5.0 RECOMMENDATIONS AND REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS
Based on our understanding of the purpose of the Asbestos and Lead-Paint Survey, the results of laboratory analysis, and our findings and observations, ECS presents the following recommendations.
5.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials
ECS recommends where a material type has been identified as asbestos-containing that, other materials with similar color, texture, age, and size throughout the building’s interior and exterior be assumed to contain asbestos. Please refer to Section 4.1 for a complete list of building materials reported positive for asbestos and Section 4.2 for materials assumed to contain asbestos. Identified ACMs must be removed, encapsulated, or enclosed before disturbance of the materials.
If ACMs are to be removed, an accredited asbestos abatement contractor should perform the removal. it is recommended that an industrial hygienist monitor the project. This involves collecting air samples from within and outside abatement work areas to monitor the asbestos abatement contractor’s work practices throughout the project. The industrial hygienist should evaluate if the asbestos abatement work is in accordance with project specifications, U.S. EPA regulation 40 CFR Part 61-NESHAP Subpart M: National Emission Standard for Asbestos, and OSHA regulation 29 CFR
1926.1101 – Asbestos in Construction. The industrial hygienist should assess each work area to monitor the removal of ACMs. Only after the industrial hygienist has determined the identified ACMs have been removed should final clearance air samples be collected (if necessary).
ECS recommends that a project specification be prepared to delineate and quantify known and suspect hazardous and regulated materials in the buildings and to outline proper procedures for the abatement. This will help protect the owner’s liability in better defining the scope of work and contractors’ roles and responsibilities in the abatement process and holding the contractor accountable for the performance of the project. The specification typically defines the Contractor’s scope of work and outline requirements and procedures that must be followed for the project. The
April 1, 2026 intent of the specification is to give performance requirements for the Contractor so that the project can be completed safely and in compliance with applicable federal and state regulations. Typically, the specification document serves as part of the site owner’s contract with the contractor.
Suspect ACMs not observed due to inaccessibility or not sampled due to the destructive means that sampling would require may also be encountered during construction activities. At the time of the survey, only limited destructive means were used to locate or sample suspect ACMs; therefore, additional suspect ACMs may remain within inaccessible areas that include, but are not limited to, [sub-grade walls, structural members, topping slabs, exterior areas, sub-grade sealants, flooring located below underlayments, vapor barriers, pipe trenches, and other subsurface utilities, etc.] If additional suspect ACMs are uncovered which were not accessible during this survey, it is recommended that these materials either be assumed to contain asbestos or be sampled before disturbance upon discovery for asbestos content by an asbestos inspector in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.1101.
5.2 Lead in Paint and Surface Coatings
Based on the findings of the lead survey, detectable concentrations of lead were identified on some paints and surface coatings. The presence of lead is a concern primarily when conditions exist where it may be inhaled or ingested. Regardless of the analytical results of a material, all painted and/or glazed surfaces may still contain concentrations of lead in the paint, which, when disturbed, may generate lead dust greater than the Permissible Exposure Limit (PEL) of 50 micrograms per cubic meter (ug/m3) as an 8-hour Time Weighted Average (TWA) established by the OSHA “Lead Exposure in Construction Rule (29 CFR 1926.62).”
The OSHA standard gives no guidance on acceptable levels of lead in paint at which no exposure to airborne lead (above the action level) would be expected. Rather, OSHA defines airborne concentrations and references specific types of work practices and operations from which a lead hazard may be generated (reference 29 CFR 1926.62, section d). Environmental and personnel monitoring should be conducted during any removal/demolition process (as appropriate) to verify that actual personal exposures are below the PEL of 50 µg/m3 as an 8-hour TWA. Under OSHA requirements, the contractor performing renovation work will be required to conduct this monitoring and follow applicable requirements under 29 CFR 1926.62 if disturbing lead-containing paint.
6.0 LIMITATIONS
The conclusions and recommendations presented within this report are based upon a reasonable level of assessment within normal bounds and standards of professional practice for a site in this particular geographic setting. ECS is not responsible or liable for the discovery and elimination of hazards that may potentially cause damage, accidents, or injuries.
The observations, conclusions, and recommendations pertaining to environmental conditions at the subject site are necessarily limited to conditions observed, and/or materials reviewed at the time this study was undertaken. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made with regard to the conclusions and recommendations presented within this report. This report is provided for the exclusive use of the client. This report is not intended to be used or relied upon in connection with other projects or by other unidentified third parties without the written consent of ECS and the client.
April 1, 2026
During this study, samples were submitted for analysis at an accredited laboratory via polarized light microscopy. As with any similar survey of this nature, actual conditions exist only at the precise locations from which samples were collected. Certain inferences are based on the results of this sampling and related testing to form a professional opinion of conditions in areas beyond those from which the samples were collected. No warranty, expressed or implied, is made.
Our recommendations are in part based on federal, state, and local regulations and guidelines. ECS does not assume the responsibility of the person(s) in charge of the site, or otherwise undertake responsibility for reporting to any local, state, or federal public agencies, any conditions at the site that may present a potential danger to public health, safety, or the environment. Under this scope of services, ECS assumes no responsibility regarding any response actions initiated as a result of these findings. General compliance with regulations and response actions are the sole responsibility of the Client and should be conducted in accordance with local, state, and/or federal requirements.
April 1, 2026
Appendix I: Figures
Asbestos & Lead Survey Figure 1
Site Overview
HP135
Camp Lejune
Jacksonville, North Carolina
ECS Project No. 49-26342
IMAGE SOURCE:
Google Earth
Subject Structure
NOTES:
Floor plan not to scale.
Asbestos & Lead Survey Figure 2
Asbestos & Lead Sample Locations
Repair BEQ HP135 Camp Lejune
Jacksonville, North Carolina
ECS Project No. 49-26342
First Floor
135-03-2
Destructive 135-1-1,2
135-01-1 135-17-2
135-17-7
135-08-2
135-07-1
135-02-1
135-17-1
135-08-1
135-19-1
135-05-1
ACM Legend
Black Mastic associated with Beige Floor Tiles
Black Damp Proofing Mastic behind Brick Venner
XX-XX
SAMPLE LEGEND:
Sample Location
Asbestos Not Detected
Asbestos Detected >1%
Lead-Containing Paint
Below Detection Limits
PC-17
PC-5
PC-12
PC-19
PC-22
PC-14
PC-8
Asbestos & Lead Survey Figure 3
Asbestos & Lead Sample Locations
Repair BEQ HP135 Camp Lejune
Jacksonville, North Carolina
ECS Project No. 49-26342
2nd Floor
Destructive 135-2-1,2
135-10-1
135-17-4135-19-2
135-08-4
135-08-3
135-02-2
135-08-5
135-18-1,2
135-17-3
135-10-2
135-04-1
ACM Legend
Black Mastic associated with Beige Floor Tiles
Black Damp Proofing Mastic behind Brick Venner
XX-XX
SAMPLE LEGEND:
Sample Location
Asbestos Not Detected
Asbestos Detected >1%
Lead-Containing Paint
Below Detection Limits
PC-9
PC-11
PC-20
PC-16
PC-1PC-18
PC-13
135-09-2 135-06-1
Asbestos & Lead Survey Figure 4
Asbestos & Lead Sample Locations
Repair BEQ HP135 Camp Lejune
Jacksonville, North Carolina
ECS Project No. 49-26342
3rd Floor
135-01-2
135-07-2
135-08-7
135-05-2
135-04-2 135-17-5
135-03-1135-17-6
135-06-2
135-08-6
135-02-3
PC-21
PC-15
PC-2
PC-10
PC-3
PC-4
ACM Legend
Black Mastic associated with Beige Floor Tiles
Black Damp Proofing Mastic behind Brick Venner
XX-XX
SAMPLE LEGEND:
Sample Location
Asbestos Not Detected
Asbestos Detected >1%
Lead-Containing Paint
Below Detection Limits
135-09-1
Asbestos & Lead Survey Figure 5
Asbestos & Lead Sample Locations
Repair BEQ HP135 Camp Lejune
Jacksonville, North Carolina
ECS Project No. 49-26342
Attic/Roof & Mechanical Buildings
135-12-2
HP140
HP136
XX-XX
SAMPLE LEGEND:
Sample Location
Asbestos Not Detected
Asbestos Detected >1%
Lead-Containing Paint
Below Detection Limits
135-13-1
135-11-2
135-11-1
135-12-1
135-13-2
135-15-2 135-16-2
135-15-1 135-16-1
135-14-2135-14-1
135-21-1,2
135-20-1
135-20-2ACM Legend
Built-up Roofing
Parapet Wall Flashing
PC-6
PC-7
PC-23
Appendix II: Site Photographs
1 - View of HP135.
2 - View of HP 136 - mechanical building.
ECS Project No. 49:26342
3 - View of HP 140.
4 - View of the A-frame shingled roof.
5 - View of the attic.
6 - View of typical common hallways.
7 - Typical lounges.
8 - View of typical laundry rooms.
9 - View of typical duty offices.
10 - View of the typical living quarters.
11 - View of typical private bathrooms.
12 - View of typical common area bathrooms.
13 - View of typical converted mechanical rooms.
14 - 12" floor tiles with ACM black mastic in the living quarters.
15 - ACM Flashing on parapet walls in the attic.
16 - Additional view of ACM flashing.
17 - ACM built-up roofing in the attic.
18 - View of destructive testing location
19 - View of ACM Damp-proofing mastic on CMU behind brick veneer.
20 - View of vanity mirrors (Mechanically Fastened)
21 - View of non-ACM pink waterproofing sealant
Appendix III: Asbestos Bulk Sample Results
Bulk Asbestos Analysis By Polarized Light Microscopy EPA Method: 600/R-93/116 and
40 CFR, Part 763, Subpart E, App.E
Lab Order ID:Attn: 10094038Customer: ECS Southeast, LLP 6714 Netherlands Dr Wilmington, NC 28405
Analysis:
Date Received:
Braxton Dawson Bailey Proctor
PLM
10/09/2025
Project: BEQ HP735 Jacksonville, NC Date Reported: 10/13/2025
Sample ID
Lab Sample ID
Description
Lab Notes Asbestos
Fibrous Components
Non-Fibrous Components Treatment
Attributes
135-01-1 - A
10094038_0001
Beige Floor Tile & Black Mastic
None Detected 100% Other
Non-Fibrous
Dissolved
Beige
Homogeneous tile
135-01-1 - B
10094038_0054
Beige Floor Tile & Black Mastic
3% Chrysotile 97% Other
Non-Fibrous
Dissolved
Black
Homogeneous mastic
135-01-2 - A
10094038_0002
Beige Floor Tile & Black Mastic
None Detected 100% Other
Non-Fibrous
Dissolved
Beige
Homogeneous tile
135-01-2 - B
10094038_0055
Beige Floor Tile & Black Mastic
Not Analyzed mastic
135-02-1 - A
10094038_0003
White Canvas Wrap on Black Fiberglass TSI
None Detected 25% Fiber Glass 75% Other
Fibrous
Ashed
White
Homogeneous wrap
135-02-1 - B
10094038_0056
White Canvas Wrap on Black Fiberglass TSI
None Detected 100% Other
Non-Fibrous
Ashed
Black
Homogeneous insulation
135-02-2 - A
10094038_0004
White Canvas Wrap on Black Fiberglass TSI
None Detected 25% Fiber Glass 75% Other
Fibrous
Ashed
White
Homogeneous wrap
135-02-2 - B
10094038_0057
White Canvas Wrap on Black Fiberglass TSI
None Detected 100% Other
Non-Fibrous
Ashed
Black
Homogeneous insulation
Disclaimer: Due to the nature of the EPA 600 method, asbestos may not be detected in samples containing low levels of asbestos. We strongly recommend that analysis of floor tiles, vermiculite, and/or heterogenous soil samples be conducted by TEM for confirmation of "None Detected" by PLM. This report relates only to the samples tested and may not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of SAI. This report may not be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. government. Analytical uncertainty available upon request. Scientific Analytical Institute participates in the NVLAP Proficiency Testing program.
Unless otherwise noted blank sample correction was not performed. Estimated MDL is 0.1%.
Leo Shaffer (58)
Analyst Approved Signatory
Page 1 of 8P-F-002 r15 1/15/2028 Scientific Analytical Institute, Inc. 4604 Dundas Dr. Greensboro, NC 27407 (336) 292-3888
EPA Method: 600/R-93/116 and
40 CFR, Part 763, Subpart E, App.E
Lab Order ID:Attn: 10094038Customer: ECS Southeast, LLP 6714 Netherlands Dr Wilmington, NC 28405
Analysis:
Date Received:
Braxton Dawson Bailey Proctor
PLM
10/09/2025
Project: BEQ HP735 Jacksonville, NC Date Reported: 10/13/2025
Sample ID
Lab Sample ID
Description
Lab Notes Asbestos
Fibrous Components
Non-Fibrous Components Treatment
Attributes
135-02-3 - A
10094038_0005
White Canvas Wrap on Black Fiberglass TSI
None Detected 25% Fiber Glass 75% Other
Fibrous
Ashed
White
Homogeneous wrap
135-02-3 - B
10094038_0058
White Canvas Wrap on Black Fiberglass TSI
None Detected 100% Other
Non-Fibrous
Ashed
Black
Homogeneous insulation
135-03-1
10094038_0006
Tan HVAC Duct Mastic
None Detected 100% Other
Non-Fibrous
Ashed
Tan
Homogeneous
135-03-2
10094038_0007
Tan HVAC Duct Mastic
None Detected 100% Other
Non-Fibrous
Ashed
Tan
Homogeneous
135-04-1
10094038_0008
Drywall & Joint Compound (Composite)
None Detected 10% Cellulose 90% Other
Non-Fibrous
Crushed
Gray, White
Homogeneous drywall: none detected; joint compound: none detected
135-04-2
10094038_0009
Drywall & Joint Compound (Composite)
None Detected 10% Cellulose 90% Other
Non-Fibrous
Crushed
White, Gray
Homogeneous drywall: none detected; joint compound: none detected
135-05-1
10094038_0010
Pinhole Fissure Ceiling Tile
None Detected 40% 40%
Cellulose Mineral Wool
20% Other
Fibrous
Ashed
Beige
Homogeneous
135-05-2
10094038_0011
Pinhole Fissure Ceiling Tile
None Detected 40% 40%
Cellulose Mineral Wool
20% Other
Fibrous
Ashed
Beige
Homogeneous
Disclaimer: Due to the nature of the EPA 600 method, asbestos may not be detected in samples containing low levels of asbestos. We strongly recommend that analysis of floor tiles, vermiculite, and/or heterogenous soil samples be conducted by TEM for confirmation of "None Detected" by PLM. This report relates only to the samples tested and may not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of SAI. This report may not be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. government. Analytical uncertainty available upon request. Scientific Analytical Institute participates in the NVLAP Proficiency Testing program.
Unless otherwise noted blank sample correction was not performed. Estimated MDL is 0.1%.
Leo Shaffer (58)
Page 2 of 8P-F-002 r15 1/15/2028 Scientific Analytical Institute, Inc. 4604 Dundas Dr. Greensboro, NC 27407 (336) 292-3888
EPA Method: 600/R-93/116 and
40 CFR, Part 763, Subpart E, App.E
Lab Order ID:Attn: 10094038Customer: ECS Southeast, LLP 6714 Netherlands Dr Wilmington, NC 28405
Analysis:
Date Received:
Braxton Dawson Bailey Proctor
PLM
10/09/2025
Project: BEQ HP735 Jacksonville, NC Date Reported: 10/13/2025
Sample ID
Lab Sample ID
Description
Lab Notes Asbestos
Fibrous Components
Non-Fibrous Components Treatment
Attributes
135-06-1
10094038_0012
Pinhole Ceiling Tile
None Detected 40% 40%
Mineral Wool Cellulose
20% Other
Fibrous
Ashed
Beige
Homogeneous
135-06-2
10094038_0013
Pinhole Ceiling Tile
None Detected 40% 40%
Cellulose Mineral Wool
20% Other
Fibrous
Ashed
Beige
Homogeneous
135-07-1
10094038_0014
Concrete Floor Coating
None Detected 100% Other
Non-Fibrous
Ashed
Gray
Homogeneous
135-07-2
10094038_0015
Concrete Floor Coating
None Detected 100% Other
Non-Fibrous
Ashed
Gray
Homogeneous
135-08-1
10094038_0016
Block Coating
None Detected 100% Other
Non-Fibrous
Ashed
Gray
Homogeneous
135-08-2
10094038_0017
Block Coating
None Detected 100% Other
Non-Fibrous
Ashed
Gray
Homogeneous
135-08-3
10094038_0018
Block Coating
None Detected 100% Other
Non-Fibrous
Ashed
Gray
Homogeneous
135-08-4
10094038_0019
Block Coating
None Detected 100% Other
Non-Fibrous
Ashed
Gray
Homogeneous
Disclaimer: Due to the nature of the EPA 600 method, asbestos may not be detected in samples containing low levels of asbestos. We strongly recommend that analysis of floor tiles, vermiculite, and/or heterogenous soil samples be conducted by TEM for confirmation of "None Detected" by PLM. This report relates only to the samples tested and may not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of SAI. This report may not be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. government. Analytical uncertainty available upon request. Scientific Analytical Institute participates in the NVLAP Proficiency Testing program.
Unless otherwise noted blank sample correction was not performed. Estimated MDL is 0.1%.
Leo Shaffer (58)
Page 3 of 8P-F-002 r15 1/15/2028 Scientific Analytical Institute, Inc. 4604 Dundas Dr. Greensboro, NC 27407 (336) 292-3888
EPA Method: 600/R-93/116 and
40 CFR, Part 763, Subpart E, App.E
Lab Order ID:Attn: 10094038Customer: ECS Southeast, LLP 6714 Netherlands Dr Wilmington, NC 28405
Analysis:
Date Received:
Braxton Dawson Bailey Proctor
PLM
10/09/2025
Project: BEQ HP735 Jacksonville, NC Date Reported: 10/13/2025
Sample ID
Lab Sample ID
Description
Lab Notes Asbestos
Fibrous Components
Non-Fibrous Components Treatment
Attributes
135-08-5
10094038_0020
Block Coating
None Detected 100% Other
Non-Fibrous
Ashed
Gray
Homogeneous
135-08-6
10094038_0021
Block Coating
None Detected 100% Other
Non-Fibrous
Ashed
Gray
Homogeneous
135-08-7
10094038_0022
Block Coating
None Detected 100% Other
Non-Fibrous
Ashed
Gray
Homogeneous
135-09-1
10094038_0023
Expansion Joint Caulk
None Detected 100% Other
Non-Fibrous
Ashed
Gray
Homogeneous
135-09-2
10094038_0024
Expansion Joint Caulk
None Detected 100% Other
Non-Fibrous
Ashed
Gray
Homogeneous
135-10-1
10094038_0025
Fire Caulk
None Detected 100% Other
Non-Fibrous
Ashed
Red
Homogeneous
135-10-2
10094038_0026
Fire Caulk
None Detected 100% Other
Non-Fibrous
Ashed
Red
Homogeneous
135-11-1
10094038_0027
Gray HVAC Duct Mastic
None Detected 100% Other
Non-Fibrous
Ashed
Gray
Homogeneous
Disclaimer: Due to the nature of the EPA 600 method, asbestos may not be detected in samples containing low levels of asbestos. We strongly recommend that analysis of floor tiles, vermiculite, and/or heterogenous soil samples be conducted by TEM for confirmation of "None Detected" by PLM. This report relates only to the samples tested and may not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of SAI. This report may not be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. government. Analytical uncertainty available upon request. Scientific Analytical Institute participates in the NVLAP Proficiency Testing program.
Unless otherwise noted blank sample correction was not performed. Estimated MDL is 0.1%.
Leo Shaffer (58)
Page 4 of 8P-F-002 r15 1/15/2028 Scientific Analytical Institute, Inc. 4604 Dundas Dr. Greensboro, NC 27407 (336) 292-3888
EPA Method: 600/R-93/116 and
40 CFR, Part 763, Subpart E, App.E
Lab Order ID:Attn: 10094038Customer: ECS Southeast, LLP 6714 Netherlands Dr Wilmington, NC 28405
Analysis:
Date Received:
Braxton Dawson Bailey Proctor
PLM
10/09/2025
Project: BEQ HP735 Jacksonville, NC Date Reported: 10/13/2025
Sample ID
Lab Sample ID
Description
Lab Notes Asbestos
Fibrous Components
Non-Fibrous Components Treatment
Attributes
135-11-2
10094038_0028
Gray HVAC Duct Mastic
None Detected 100% Other
Non-Fibrous
Ashed
Gray
Homogeneous
135-12-1
10094038_0029
Shingles
None Detected 100% Other
Non-Fibrous
Dissolved
Black
Homogeneous
135-12-2
10094038_0030
Shingles
None Detected 100% Other
Non-Fibrous
Dissolved
Black
Homogeneous
135-13-1
10094038_0031
Tar Paper Underlayment
None Detected 90% Cellulose 10% Other
Fibrous
Ashed
Black
Homogeneous
135-13-2
10094038_0032
Tar Paper Underlayment
None Detected 90% Cellulose 10% Other
Fibrous
Ashed
Black
Homogeneous
135-14-1
10094038_0033
Built Up Roof
10%4% Chrysotile Cellulose 86% Other
Non-Fibrous
Dissolved
Black
Homogeneous
135-14-2
10094038_0034
Built Up Roof
Not Analyzed
135-15-1
10094038_0035
Flashing - Top Layer
20%8% Chrysotile Cellulose 72% Other
Fibrous
Ashed
Black
Homogeneous
Disclaimer: Due to the nature of the EPA 600 method, asbestos may not be detected in samples containing low levels of asbestos. We strongly recommend that analysis of floor tiles, vermiculite, and/or heterogenous soil samples be conducted by TEM for confirmation of "None Detected" by PLM. This report relates only to the samples tested and may not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of SAI. This report may not be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. government. Analytical uncertainty available upon request. Scientific Analytical Institute participates in the NVLAP Proficiency Testing program.
Unless otherwise noted blank sample correction was not performed. Estimated MDL is 0.1%.
Leo Shaffer (58)
Page 5 of 8P-F-002 r15 1/15/2028 Scientific Analytical Institute, Inc. 4604 Dundas Dr. Greensboro, NC 27407 (336) 292-3888
EPA Method: 600/R-93/116 and
40 CFR, Part 763, Subpart E, App.E
Lab Order ID:Attn: 10094038Customer: ECS Southeast, LLP 6714 Netherlands Dr Wilmington, NC 28405
Analysis:
Date Received:
Braxton Dawson Bailey Proctor
PLM
10/09/2025
Project: BEQ HP735 Jacksonville, NC Date Reported: 10/13/2025
Sample ID
Lab Sample ID
Description
Lab Notes Asbestos
Fibrous Components
Non-Fibrous Components Treatment
Attributes
135-15-2
10094038_0036
Flashing - Top Layer
Not Analyzed
135-16-1
10094038_0037
Flashing - Bottom Layer
10%5% Chrysotile Cellulose 85% Other
Non-Fibrous
Dissolved
Black
Homogeneous
135-16-2
10094038_0038
Flashing - Bottom Layer
Not Analyzed
135-17-1
10094038_0039
Ceiling Texture
None Detected 100% Other
Non-Fibrous
Crushed
White
Homogeneous
135-17-2
10094038_0040
Ceiling Texture
None Detected 100% Other
Non-Fibrous
Crushed
White
Homogeneous
135-17-3
10094038_0041
Ceiling Texture
None Detected 100% Other
Non-Fibrous
Crushed
White
Homogeneous
135-17-4
10094038_0042
Ceiling Texture
None Detected 100% Other
Non-Fibrous
Crushed
White
Homogeneous
135-17-5
10094038_0043
Ceiling Texture
None Detected 100% Other
Non-Fibrous
Crushed
White
Homogeneous
Disclaimer: Due to the nature of the EPA 600 method, asbestos may not be detected in samples containing low levels of asbestos. We strongly recommend that analysis of floor tiles, vermiculite, and/or heterogenous soil samples be conducted by TEM for confirmation of "None Detected" by PLM. This report relates only to the samples tested and may not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of SAI. This report may not be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. government. Analytical uncertainty available upon request. Scientific Analytical Institute participates in the NVLAP Proficiency Testing program.
Unless otherwise noted blank sample correction was not performed. Estimated MDL is 0.1%.
Leo Shaffer (58)
Page 6 of 8P-F-002 r15 1/15/2028 Scientific Analytical Institute, Inc. 4604 Dundas Dr. Greensboro, NC 27407 (336) 292-3888
EPA Method: 600/R-93/116 and
40 CFR, Part 763, Subpart E, App.E
Lab Order ID:Attn: 10094038Customer: ECS Southeast, LLP 6714 Netherlands Dr Wilmington, NC 28405
Analysis:
Date Received:
Braxton Dawson Bailey Proctor
PLM
10/09/2025
Project: BEQ HP735 Jacksonville, NC Date Reported: 10/13/2025
Sample ID
Lab Sample ID
Description
Lab Notes Asbestos
Fibrous Components
Non-Fibrous Components Treatment
Attributes
135-17-6
10094038_0044
Ceiling Texture
None Detected 100% Other
Non-Fibrous
Crushed
White
Homogeneous
135-17-7
10094038_0045
Ceiling Texture
None Detected 100% Other
Non-Fibrous
Crushed
White
Homogeneous
135-18-1
10094038_0046
Tile Grout
None Detected 100% Other
Non-Fibrous
Crushed
White
Homogeneous
135-18-2
10094038_0047
Tile Grout
None Detected 100% Other
Non-Fibrous
Crushed
White
Homogeneous
135-19-1
10094038_0048
Expansion Joint Caulk
None Detected 100% Other
Non-Fibrous
Ashed
Gray
Homogeneous
135-19-2
10094038_0049
Expansion Joint Caulk
None Detected 100% Other
Non-Fibrous
Ashed
Gray
Homogeneous
135-20-1
10094038_0050
Roofing
None Detected 100% Other
Non-Fibrous
Ashed
Black
Homogeneous
135-20-2
10094038_0051
Roofing
None Detected 100% Other
Non-Fibrous
Ashed
Black
Homogeneous
Disclaimer: Due to the nature of the EPA 600 method, asbestos may not be detected in samples containing low levels of asbestos. We strongly recommend that analysis of floor tiles, vermiculite, and/or heterogenous soil samples be conducted by TEM for confirmation of "None Detected" by PLM. This report relates only to the samples tested and may not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of SAI. This report may not be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. government. Analytical uncertainty available upon request. Scientific Analytical Institute participates in the NVLAP Proficiency Testing program.
Unless otherwise noted blank sample correction was not performed. Estimated MDL is 0.1%.
Leo Shaffer (58)
Page 7 of 8P-F-002 r15 1/15/2028 Scientific Analytical Institute, Inc. 4604 Dundas Dr. Greensboro, NC 27407 (336) 292-3888
EPA Method: 600/R-93/116 and
40 CFR, Part 763, Subpart E, App.E
Lab Order ID:Attn: 10094038Customer: ECS Southeast, LLP 6714 Netherlands Dr Wilmington, NC 28405
Analysis:
Date Received:
Braxton Dawson Bailey Proctor
PLM
10/09/2025
Project: BEQ HP735 Jacksonville, NC Date Reported: 10/13/2025
Sample ID
Lab Sample ID
Description
Lab Notes Asbestos
Fibrous Components
Non-Fibrous Components Treatment
Attributes
135-21-1
10094038_0052
Door Caulk
None Detected 100% Other
Non-Fibrous
Ashed
Gray
Homogeneous
135-21-2
10094038_0053
Door Caulk
None Detected 100% Other
Non-Fibrous
Ashed
Gray
Homogeneous
Disclaimer: Due to the nature of the EPA 600 method, asbestos may not be detected in samples containing low levels of asbestos. We strongly recommend that analysis of floor tiles, vermiculite, and/or heterogenous soil samples be conducted by TEM for confirmation of "None Detected" by PLM. This report relates only to the samples tested and may not be reproduced, except in full, without the written approval of SAI. This report may not be used by the client to claim product endorsement by NVLAP or any other agency of the U.S. government. Analytical uncertainty available upon request. Scientific Analytical Institute participates in the NVLAP Proficiency Testing program.
Unless otherwise noted blank sample correction was not performed. Estimated MDL is 0.1%.
Leo Shaffer (58)
Page 8 of 8P-F-002 r15 1/15/2028 Scientific Analytical Institute, Inc. 4604 Dundas Dr. Greensboro, NC 27407 (336) 292-3888
Phone:
Fu:
Emall:
cc:
Project:
Client Not8s:
Date Sampled:
P.0.11.
Date Submitted:
Analyal8:
TurnAroundTlme:
13!Hl1-1 13!Hl1-2 13!Hl2-1 13!Hl2-2 13!Hl2-3 13!Hl3-1 13!Hl3-2 13!Hl4-1 13!Hl4-2 13!Hl>1 13!Hl>2 135-06-1 135-06-2 13!Hl7-1 13!Hl7-2 135-08-1 135--08-2 135--08-3 13!Hl8-4 13!Hl8-5 13!Hl8-6 135--08-7 13!Hl9-1 13!Hl9-2 13>10-1 13>10-2 13>11-1 13>11-2 13>12-1 13>12-2 13>13-1 13>13-2 13>14-1 13>14-2 13>1>1 13>1>2 13>16-1 13>16-2 13>17-1 13>17-2 13>17-3 13>17-4 13>17-5
, 13>17-6 13>17-7 13>18-1 13>18-2 13>19-1 13>19-2 13>20-1 13>20-2 13>21-1 13>21-2
Bailey Proctor outheast, LL Braxton Dawson 6714 Netherlands Drive WHmington, NC 28405 910-899-1289 910~9666 bdawson@ecslimited.com bproctor@ecslimited.com
BEQ HP735
Jacksonville, NC
10/8/2025 0:00 49-26342
10/8/2025 0:00
PL Bulk W/ Positive Stop 72-hrTAT
To See en Example CIiek the bottom Example Tab.
Enter .. ,,,,,.. befMen "cc• and">>• S.,,n SamplN with a "cc "above flle ffnt umple and and with a -..>• below flle last umpla.
Only Enter your debl on the fnt _,.., "Sheet1"
Note: Data 1 and Data 2 - optional flelda that do not shaw up on the offlclel report, however they will be Included In the e/ect'onlc data returned to yoc, to faclllata dlha data.
Beiae Floor THe & Black Mastic Beiae Floor Tile & Black Mastic White Canvas Wrap on Black FiDeralass TSI White Canvas Wrap on Black Fiberglass TSI White Canvas Wrap on Black Fiberglass TSI Tan HVAC Duct Mastic Tan HVAC Duct Mastic Drvwall & Joint Comnound !Comoositel Drvwall & Joint Comoound (Comoosltel Pinhole Fissure Ceiling Tile Pinhole Fissure Ceilina Tile Pinhole Ceillna Tile Pinhole Ceiling Tile Concrete Floor Coating Concrete Floor Coatina Block Coating Block Coating Block Coating Block Coating Block Coating Block Coating Block Coatina Expansion Joint Caulk Expansion Joint Caulk Fire Caulk Fire Caulk Grav HVAC Duct Mastic Grav HVAC Duct Mastic Shingles Shinales Tar Paoer Under1avment Tar Paper Under1ayment Built Up Roof Built Uo Roof Flashing -Top Layer Flashina - Top Laver Flashina - Bottom Laver Flashing - Bottom Layer Ceiling Texture Ceilina Texture Ceiling Texture Ceilina Texture Ceiling Texture Ceilina Texture Ceiling Texture Tile Grout Tile Grout Exoansion Joint Caulk Exoansion Joint Caulk Rooflna Roofing Door Caulk Door Caulk
1 ' -;,,. --- - ' ~ -"'...;~-·u,c~
~eeecred
41kM Dundas Drive Greensboro, NC 27407 Phone: 336.292.3888
Fax: 336.292.33J3 Em•II: l•bOsall•b.com
Sleeping Quarters SleePina Quarters Chases Chases Chases Living Quarters Above Drop Ceiling Living Quarters Above Drop Ceilini:
Livina Quarters' Ceilinas Living Quarters' Ceilings All Lounges & Halls All Lounaes & Halls Dutv Offices Duty Offices Common Areas Common Areas All Walls All Walls All Walls All Walls All Walls All Walls All Walls Exterior Exterior Mechanical rooms Mechanical rooms Attic Attic Attic Attic Attic Attic Attic - Center Attic - Center Parapet Wall - Attic Parapet Wall - Attic Parapet Wall - Attic Parapet Wall - Attic Living Quarters & Exterior Mech roo Living Quarters & Exterior Mech roo Living Quarters & Exterior Mech roo Living Quarters & Exterior Mech roo Living Quarters & Exterior Mech roo Livino Quarters & Exterior Mech roo Living Quarters & Exterior Mech roo Mechanical Rooms - Old Shower W Mechanical Rooms - Old Shower W Interior Walls Interior Walls Mech Building 140 Mech Building 140 Mech Building 140 Mecb.HuUding 140 ..... K l,_J
EPA Method: 600/R-93/116 and
40 CFR, Part 763, Subpart E, App.E
Lab Order ID:Attn: 10102384Customer: ECS Southeast, LLP 6714 Netherlands Dr Wilmington, NC 28405
Analysis:
Date Received:
Braxton Dawson
PLM
02/20/2026
Project: HP135/HP185 - Destructive Samples Date Reported: 02/25/2026
Sample ID
Lab Sample ID
Description
Lab Notes Asbestos
Fibrous Components
Non-Fibrous Components Treatment
Attributes
135-…
This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .