B178 stacker RFI Set 3.pdf
PDF 178 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Building 178 High Density Storage Stacker
- Solicitation number
- N40085-20-B-2540
About this file
This request for information document pertains to a federal contract opportunity for the design, procurement, and installation of high density storage systems and equipment for Building 178 at a Naval Facilities Engineering Command site. The contractor questions whether existing slabs have been analyzed to support new forklifts weighing 20,000 to 30,000 pounds and if 3-inch inlay slabs will adequately support this weight at sawcut control joints. The government response indicates no specific analysis has been completed but the floors are intended for and routinely subjected to heavy industrial traffic. The contractor's designer must confirm floor strength is sufficient. The related federal contract opportunity involves solicitation N40085-20-B-2540 for high density storage stacker systems, including narrow aisle forklifts, chargers, guide wire systems, rack systems, fire suppression, alarm modifications, and electrical and concrete work. The agency is the Department of the Navy Naval Facilities Engineering Command.
View the file
Other files
Show all 21
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
REQUEST FOR INFORMATION DATE
Jun 17, 2020
ACTIVITY ID
B178 HIGH DENSITY STORAGE STACKER, PNSY
CONTRACT TITLECONTRACT NO
N40085-20-B-2540
RFI NO
MISCELLANEOUS
RFI SUBJECT DWG NO
DWG DETAIL
DWG SHEET NO
VARIOUS
SPEC SECTION
SPEC PARAGRAPH
SPEC PAGE NO
RFI PRIORITY?
POTENTIAL TIME/COST?
SCHEDULE REFERENCED?
CRITICAL PATH?
HIGH NORMAL
YES NO
YES NO
YES NO
4296/2C (9/98) SHEET of
CONTRACTOR QUESTION AND PROPOSED SOLUTION
RFI QUESTION/ISSUE:
1. Have existing slabs been analyzed by a structural engineer to determine adequate support for a new fork truck 20,000-30,000 pounds?
2. Is 3 ½” inlay slab adequate to support this weight especially at sawcut control joints? Our subcontractor has seen control joints fail which affect the functionality of the guide wire system.
3. Can the bid due date be extended ?
CONTRACTOR PROPOSED SOLUTION:
Jun 17, 2020
DATECONTRACTOR/PROJECT MANAGER
NOTE: If the determination of this RFI is "Answered - No Cost" then this reply is given with the expressed understanding that it does not constitute a basis for any change in the amount or time of subject contract. Information provided in this response does not authorize work not currently included in the contract. If determination of this RFI is "Answered - Pending PCO" then this response may require a change to the contract.
ANSWERS AND COMMENTS
RFI REASON CODE
RFI ACTION
COMMENTS FOR DETAILED REVIEWER:
DETAILED REVIEWER 1 RECOMMENDED RFI SOLUTION:
DETAILED REVIEWER 1 NAME/SIGNATURE TITLE RESPONSE DATE
DETAILED REVIEWER 2 RECOMMENDED RFI SOLUTION:
DETAILED REVIEWER 2 NAME/SIGNATURE TITLE RESPONSE DATE
RFI RESPONSE:
DATEGOVERNMENT CONSTRUCTION MANAGER
jon.reaves Typewritten Text No specific analysis has been completed by the Government for this project to verify floor strength, however these floors are intended for and are routinely subjected to industrial traffic which applies heavy loads as shown on the included drawing 178-13-362. The contractor's designer is to confirm (as needed) that the building and its floors have the required strength to support the contractor's specific design loads.
jon.reaves Typewritten Text Structural Engineer jon.reaves Typewritten Text 6/22/20
| form1[0]: COSString{} |
| Subform1[2]: |
| Subform1[5]: | |
| 2020-06-22T08:22:28-0400 | |
| REAVES.JON.A.1388016660 |
Subform1[7]:
Subform1[9]:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .