N4008519R9257 RFP.pdf

SOLICITIATION NO. N40085-19-R-9257 DESIGN-BUILD (DB) HURRICANE FLORENCE RECOVERY MILCON PACKAGE 7, HURRICANE FLORENCE RECOVERY Facilities at MCAS NEW RIVER, NORTH CAROLINA

JOHN P. BISHOP 757-341-1979

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS

NEGOTIATED

15-Nov-2019

(RFP)

(IFB)

X

CALL:

B. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)

See Item 7

2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID

3. DATE ISSUED

9. FOR INFORMATION A. NAME

SOLICITATION

X

NSN 7540-01-155-3212 1442-101 STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 4-85)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.236-1(e)

11. The Contractor shall begin performance w ithin _______15 calendar days and complete it w ithin ________1826 calendar days after receiving aw ard, notice to proceed. This performance period is X mandatory, negotiable. (See _________________________52.211-10

12 A. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?

(If "YES," indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12B.)

X YES NO

13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:

A. Sealed offers in original and __________9 copies to perform the w ork required are due at the place specif ied in Item 8 by ___________ local time ______________17 Dec 2019 (date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers must be publicly opened at that time.

shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time offers are due.

B. An offer guarantee X is, is not required.

C. All offers are subject to the (1) w ork requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.

D. Offers providing less than _______120 calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due w ill not be considered and w ill be rejected.

SOLICITATION, OFFER,

AND AWARD

(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

1. SOLICITATION NO.

IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.

4. CONTRACT NO.

7. ISSUED BY CODE

NAVFAC MID ATLANTIC

ACQUISITION CORE

9324 VIRGINIA AVENUE

NORFOLK VA 23511-3095

N40085

PAGE OF PAGES

1 OF

CODE

(Title, identifying no., date):

12B. CALENDAR DAYS

02:00 PM (hour)

Sealed envelopes containing offers

5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NO. 6. PROJECT NO.

8. ADDRESS OFFER TO (If Other Than Item 7)

FAX:TEL: TEL: FAX:

N4008519R9257 56

20B. SIGNATURE

(REV. 4-85)STANDARD FORM 1442 BACK

TO SIGN

NSN 7540-01-155-3212

SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD (Continued) (Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

CODE FACILITY CODE

17. The offeror agrees to perform the w ork required at the prices specif ied below in strict accordance w ith the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in w riting w ithin ________ calendar days after the date offers are due.

the minimum requirements stated in Item 13D. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13D.)

AMOUNTS SEE SCHEDULE OF PRICES

18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.

19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation -- give number and date of each)

AMENDMENT NO.

DATE

20A. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN

OFFER (Type or print)

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:

22. AMOUNT 23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN ITEM

(4 copies unless otherwise specified)

CODE

(Insert any number equal to or greater than

20C. OFFER DATE

25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO

10 U.S.C. 2304(c) 41 U.S.C. 253(c)

CODE27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY:26. ADMINISTERED BY

(Include ZIP Code)14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR 15. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code)

See Item 14

(Include only if different than Item 14)16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS

30B. SIGNATURE

29. AWARD (Contractor is not required to sign this document.)

document and return _______ copies to issuing office.) Contractor agrees Your of f er on this solicitation, is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award con-to f urnish and deliv er all items or perf orm all work, requisitions identif ied summates the contract, which consists of (a) the Gov ernment solicitation and on this f orm and any continuation sheets f or the consideration stated in this y our of f er, and (b) this contract award. No f urther contractual document is contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be necessary .

gov erned by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certif ications, and specif ications or incorporated by ref er-ence in or attached to this contract.

30A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED 31A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

30C. DATE

(Type or print)

TEL: EMAIL:

31B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 31C. AWARD DATE

BY

CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE

(Contractor is required to sign this28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT

(M ust be fully completed by offeror)OFFER

Section 00 10 00 - Solicitation

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

Base Price - P695F

FFP

Total Price for P695F CNATT Classroom Building Replacement FOB: Destination

NET AMT

Base Price - P707F

FFP

Total Price for P707F Bachelor Enlisted Quarters Replacement

Base Price - P378F

FFP

Total Price for P378F CH-53K Maintenance Hangar Replacement

Base Price - P728F

FFP

Total Price for P728F C-12W Aircraft Maintenance Hangar Replacement

DELIVERY INFORMATION

CLIN DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /

CAGE

0001 N/A N/A N/A N/A

0002 N/A N/A N/A N/A

0003 N/A N/A N/A N/A

0004 N/A N/A N/A N/A

Section 00 21 00 - Instructions

SF1442 BLOCK 10 CONTINUATION

THE DESIGN TO BUDGETS WILL BE INCLUDED IN THE PHASE II AMENDMENT.

WAGE DETERMINATION GENERAL DECISION NUMBER: NC20190038 MOD 01 DATED 09/13/2019.

Section 00 21 16 - Instructions to Proposers

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. GENERAL

1.1 GENERAL OVERVIEW OF PROCUREMENT PROCESS

1.2 GENERAL OVERVIEW OF CONTRACT

2. BASIS FOR AWARD

3. EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

4. PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS

4.1 PRE-PROPOSAL CONFERENCE AND SITE VISIT

4.2 PROPOSAL SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS

4.3 PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRIES (PPIs)

4.4 BETA.SAM.GOV CONTRACT OPPORTUNITIES

5 INCORPORATION OF TECHNICAL PROPOSALS

6. CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE INFORMATION

7. ATTACHMENTS:

7.1 ATTACHMENT A - PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRY LOG

7.2 ATTACHMENT B - SECNAV 5512 – BASE ACCESS FORM (Naval Station Norfolk)

7.3 ATTACHMENT C - CONSTRUCTION AND DESIGN EXPERIENCE PROJECT DATA SHEET

7.4 ATTACHMENT D – SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTING RECORD

7.5 ATTACHMENT E – SMALL BUSINESS PARTICPIATION AND COMMITMENT STRATEGY

7.6 ATTACHMENT F – PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

7.7 ATTACHMENT G – SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTING PLAN

7.8 ATTACHMENT H – PROPOSED PROJECT DURATIONS

7.9 ATTACHMENT I – ONE DAY PASS REQUEST

1. GENERAL

1.1 GENERAL OVERVIEW OF PROCUREMENT PROCESS

1.1.1 This solicitation is being issues as UNRESTRICTED FOR FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION.

1.1.2 The NAICS Code for this procurement is 236220 and the Size Standard is $36.5M.

1.1.3 This acquisition will be advertised utilizing FAR Part 36.3, Two-Phase Design-Build Selection Procedures and FAR Part 15 – Contracting by Negotiation resulting in a Firm-Fixed Price (FFP) Contract for Construction Services.

1.1.4 In accordance with DFARS 236.204, the estimated magnitude of construction for each project in Package 3 is as follows:

P695F – BETWEEN $100,000,000 and $250,000,000 P707F – BETWEEN $25,000,000 and $100,000,000 P378F – BETWEEN $250,000,000 and $500,000,000 P728F – BETWEEN $25,000,000 and $100,000,000

1.2 GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE CONTRACT

The general intent of this solicitation is to award a Fixed Price Construction Contract for design-build (DB) projects in Hurricane Florence Recovery Package 7 at Marine Corps Air Station (MCAS) New River, North Carolina.

Package 7 consists of CNATT Classroom Building Replacement (P695F), Bachelor Enlisted Quarters Replacement (P707F), CH-53K Maintenance Hangar Replacement (P378F), and C-12W Aircraft Maintenance Hangar Replacement (P728F).

P695F – CNATT Classroom Building Constructs a 120,000 sf multi-story steel framed, reinforced concrete masonry unit classroom building on a pile foundation with standing seam metal roof. The building includes a combination passenger/freight elevators, classrooms, administrative spaces, aircraft trainer spaces, auditorium, and personal support spaces. Site improvements include demolition, utilities, and parking.

P707F – Bachelor Enlisted Quarters Constructs a 75,500 square foot multi-story Bachelor Enlisted Quarters on pile foundation with reinforced concrete slab, structural steel framing, exterior brick and masonry veneer, interior CMU walls, standing seam metal roof system to match adjacent buildings, providing 165 rooms with semi-private baths in the standard 2+0 room configuration. Community and service core areas consist of laundry facilities, lounges, administrative offices, housekeeping areas, and public restrooms. Site improvements include demolition, utilities, and parking.

P378F – CH-53K Maintenance Hangar Constructs a 297,000 sf, three module Type II Aircraft Maintenance Hangar in support of three CH-53K aircraft squadrons. The hangar will include a multi-story crew/equipment/administrative area at the rear of the hangar bay.

Work includes an aircraft hangar, associated maintenance shops, administrative spaces, personnel spaces, aviation operations spaces, parts and tool storage space, hazardous materials storage area, and associated aircraft support equipment. The primary facility will be steel frame construction with suspended cantilever trusses supporting the hangar bay roof. The roof will be a standing seam metal roof over rigid insulation on steel deck supported by steel joists. Second floor framing will be concrete on steel floor decking. Exterior walls will have metal siding on the hangar bay and concrete masonry unit on the operations/administrative area with thermally efficient windows and doors. Built-in equipment includes four passenger freight elevators, three (8-ton) bridge cranes, fabric hangar doors, backup generator, waste fluid collection system, aircraft power system, aircraft grounding grid, lightning protection, compressed air system, and an aqueous film-forming foam system with hangar floor drainage and containment.

This project also constructs a 230,000 sf multi-level vehicle parking facility, an aircraft access apron, a 527,000 sf aircraft parking apron, two aircraft washracks to support the CH-53K, a master storm water detention facility with pumping station, and an oil/water separator. Site improvements include demolition, utilities, roadways, flightline fencing.

P728F – C-12W Aircraft Maintenance Hangar Constructs a 38,000 square foot modified Type I Aircraft Maintenance Hangar and a 18,000 square foot Aircraft Operations Facility to support Air Station C-12W operations. The hangar will provide space for aircraft operations function, Transient Aircraft Services Division (TASD), ground support equipment storage, and C-12W aircraft maintenance. Hangar construction includes a deep pile foundation, reinforced concrete floors, metal siding, and concrete masonry unit walls. The project includes fabric hangar doors, radiant gas heat, five-ton overhead bridge crane, embedded grounding grid, aircraft grounding points, a two stop combination passenger/freight elevator and loading dock. The hangar will provide high bay maintenance space, hazardous material storage, a climate controlled battery service locker, avionics vault, tool room, equipment storage spaces, administrative spaces, briefing room, conference room, pilot ready room, VIP lounge, classroom, and personnel support spaces. The project includes purchased temporary facilities to accommodate the aircraft operations function displaced by the demolition of AS843. Site improvements include demolition, utilities, and parking.

2. BASIS FOR AWARD

2.1. The Government reserves the right to eliminate from consideration for award any or all offers at any time prior to award of the contract; to negotiate with offerors in the competitive range; and to award the contract to the offeror submitting the proposal determined to represent the best value—the proposal most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered.

2.2. The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)). The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary. In addition, if the Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.

2.3. The tradeoff process is selected as appropriate for this acquisition. The Government considers it to be in in its best interest to allow consideration of award to other than the lowest priced offeror or other than the highest technically rated offeror.

2.4. For this two-phase design-build procurement, Factors 1-3 will be evaluated in Phase I and Factors 4-6 will be evaluated in Phase II. Factor 1 will only be rated Acceptable or Unacceptable. If an offeror is rated Unacceptable in Factor 1, then they will not be considered for Phase II unless corrected through discussions. In making the best value award decision after Phase II, the Government will consider Factors 2-6 and price. The relative order of importance of the non-price evaluation factors is that technical factors (Factors 2, 4, 5, and 6) are equal to each other and, when combined, are of equal importance to the performance confidence assessment (Factor 3). All technical factors and the performance confidence assessment (past performance) rating, when combined, are significantly more important than price.

2.5. Any proposal found to have a Deficiency in meeting the stated solicitation requirements or performance objectives will be considered ineligible for award, unless the Deficiency is corrected through discussions. Proposals may be found to have either a Significant Weakness or multiple Weaknesses that impact either the individual factor rating or the overall rating for the proposal. The evaluation report must document the evaluation Government’s assessment of the identified Significant Weakness(s) and/or Weakness(s) and the associated risk to successful contract performance . This assessment must provide the rationale for proceeding to award without discussions.

3. EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

1. The solicitation requires the evaluation of price and the following non-price factors:

PHASE I

Factor 1 – Technical Approach Factor 2 – Experience Factor 3 – Past Performance

PHASE II

Factor 4 – Technical Solution Factor 5 – Project Management Approach Factor 6 – Small Business Utilization

Price

The distinction between Experience and Past Performance is that Experience pertains to the types of work and volume of work completed by a contractor that are comparable to the types of work covered by this requirement, in terms of size, scope, and complexity. Past Performance pertains to both the relevance of recent efforts and how well a contractor has performed on the contracts.

2. For this two-phase design-build procurement, Factors 1-3 will be evaluated in Phase I and Factors 4-6 will be evaluated in Phase II. Factor 1 will only be rated Acceptable or Unacceptable. If an offeror is rated Unacceptable in Factor 1, then they will not be considered for Phase II unless corrected through discussions. In making the best value award decision after Phase II, the Government will consider Factors 2-6 and price. The relative order of importance of the non-price evaluation factors is that technical factors (Factors 2, 4, 5, and 6) are equal to each other and, when combined, are of equal importance to the performance confidence assessment (Factor 3). All technical factors and the performance confidence assessment (past performance) rating, when combined, are significantly more important than price.

After evaluating Phase I proposals, the source selection authority shall select the most highly qualified offerors and request that only those offerors submit Phase II proposals. In accordance with FAR 36.303-1(a)(4), the solicitation shall state that a maximum of three offerors will be selected to submit Phase II proposals, unless the Government determines it is in its best interest to include up to a maximum of the five most highly qualified offerors.

The importance of price will increase if the Offerors’ non-price proposals are considered essentially equal in terms of overall quality, or if price is so high as to significantly diminish the value of a non-price proposal’s superiority to the Government. Award will be made to the responsible Offeror whose offer conforms to the solicitation and represents the best value to the Government, price and non-price factors considered.

3. Basis of Evaluation and Submittal Requirements for Each Factor:

a. Price: (PHASE II)

(1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

Price binder: Price shall be submitted on the Price Proposal Form included in the solicitation. The offeror shall submit one (1) original, marked “Original”, and one (1) copy, marked “Copy”, each in a separate three ring binder with the following:

• Cover page with solicitation number, solicitation title, offeror name, address, phone number, fax number, DUNS, CAGE code, Point of Contact (POC), POC phone number, and POC email address;

• Completed SF 1442 signed with all amendments acknowledged;

• Price Proposal Form;

• Copy of Representation and Certifications and proof of registration in System for Award

Management (SAM);

• Confirmation of filing of Veterans’ Employment and Training (VETS) VETS-4212 for the 2018 filing cycle;

• Bid Guarantee in accordance with FAR Clause 52.228-1, Bid Guarantee. Amount shall be at least 20 percent of the proposed price, but shall not exceed $3 million; and

• Responsibility Determination Information (see below).

• Small Business Subcontracting Plan (see below).

In the event of a discrepancy between the original and copies, the original version of the proposal will govern. Also, price information included in the non-price/technical proposal will not be considered. Likewise, non-price/technical information included in the price proposal will not be considered.

The offeror is required to submit a complete Price Proposal Form that includes completion of all contract line items numbers (CLINs).

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO BE SUBMITTED WITH PRICE PROPOSAL PACKAGE:

RESPONSIBILITY DETERMINATION INFORMATION – In order to be eligible for award, the offeror must be determined responsible in accordance with FAR Part 9, specifically FAR 9.104-1, General Standards. In a separate tab, the offeror shall provide the following information in the price proposal package:

1. One (1) signed bank reference demonstrating adequate financial resources. If offeror’s firm has a line of credit – provide information on how many figures offeror can borrow against the line of credit (i.e. medium 6 figures – exact line of credit is not required).

2. The offeror shall provide the latest three complete fiscal year financial statements for the prime contractor, certified by an independent accounting firm, if practicable, or signed by an authorized officer of the organization. Submit evidence of availability of working/operating capital, which will be used for the performance of the resultant contract. For Joint Venture arrangements, submit the latest three complete fiscal year financial statements for each company in the Joint Venture and discuss the financial responsibilities among the companies. The Government may also utilize Dun & Bradstreet reports to evaluate the financial capacity of the offeror.

3. Description of offeror’s facilities and equipment.

4. Other offeror’s work presently under contract.

SMALL BUSINESS SUBCONTRACTING PLAN (reference FAR 52.219-9 Alt II and DFARS 252.219-7003).

NAVFAC's command-wide small business subcontracting targets are shown below. These may be higher or lower than percentages that would represent realistic, challenging small business subcontracting goals for this acquisition. Offerors representing as other than small businesses shall establish small business subcontracting plan goals and shall document in their subcontracting plans the basis for all proposed goals. Plans shall be submitted with initial offers.

SB 45%

SDB 5%

HUBZone SB 3%

WOSB 15%

SDVOSB 5%

Small businesses identified by name shall be listed in small business subcontracting plans submitted pursuant to FAR 52.219-9 in order to facilitate compliance with 252.219-7003(e).

See the Small Business Subcontracting Plan Template (Attachment G) for format.

Although required to be submitted with offeror’s price proposal, this information will not be evaluated as part of the price proposal. This information forms the basis of your firm’s responsibility determination should your firm be considered for award. Proposal packages from unsuccessful offerors will not be returned to the offeror, but shall be destroyed by the Contracting Officer. No certificate of destruction will be issued.

(2) Basis of Evaluation: The Government will evaluate price based on the total price, including all options and planned modifications. Analysis will be performed by one or more of the following techniques to ensure a fair and reasonable price:

(a) Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the RFP.

(b) Comparison of proposed prices with the IGCE.

(c) Comparison of proposed prices with available historical information.

(d) Comparison of market survey results.

b. Non-price Factors:

(1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

Non-price binder: The offeror shall submit one (1) original, marked “Original”, and nine (9) copies, marked “Copy”, each in a separate three ring binder with the following:

• Cover page with Solicitation Number, Solicitation Title, Prime Contractor Name, Address, Phone Number, Fax Number, DUNS, CAGE Code, Point of Contact, Phone Number, and Email Address;

• 8 ½ x 11 paper, 12-point font;

• Refer to individual factors for page limitations. Pages that exceed indicated page limitations shall not be evaluated; and

• Additionally, include an electronic version of the price and non-price proposal on one

CD-ROM.

As with the price proposal, in the event of a discrepancy between the original and copies (or CD-ROM), the original version of the proposal will govern. Furthermore, any price information within the technical proposal (non-price proposal) will not be considered.

Likewise, any technical/non-price information within the price proposal will not be considered.

Factor 1 – Technical Approach

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The offeror shall submit the following information:

(1) Provide a narrative describing the proposed primary construction firms and primary design firms for this contract and the rationale for proposing this arrangement. Provide the role, responsibilities, and contractual relationships between the various firms (see FAR Subpart 9.6). The narrative shall also include a simple organizational chart that clearly identifies the lines of authority between the entities. The narrative shall identify the location of the specific offices that will be involved in completing the work included in the solicitation. If the experience of a significant design subcontractor is being claimed in Factor 2 - Experience, the firm must be included in the above narrative and organizational chart.

Note: If the Offeror is proposing to utilize multiple Designers of Records (DOR) (i.e. one DOR for each Project), clearly state which DOR will be designing each Project.

The technical approach narrative shall be limited to two (2) double-sided page or four (4) single-sided pages including the organizational chart. The information requested in item #2 below is not included in this page limitation.

(2) In addition to the narrative, the offeror shall submit a signed copy of a joint venture agreement, partnership agreement, teaming agreement, approved mentor protégé agreement (MPA), or letter of commitment for each member of the offeror’s team identified above (e.g., joint venture member, partner, team member, subcontractor, parent company, subsidiary, or other affiliated company, etc.). If providing a letter of commitment, the letter shall be from the proposed DOR on the DOR’s letterhead and addressed to the Offeror.

(3) In addition to the narrative, the offeror shall submit a signed statement from the Surety on the Surety’s letterhead demonstrating a minimum bonding capacity for a single award of $475,000,000.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation:

The assessment of the offeror’s technical approach will be used as a means of evaluating the capability of the offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP. This factor will be rated on an Acceptable or Unacceptable basis.

Failure to provide any of the above required information may result in the offeror being rated Unacceptable.

Offerors that are rated Unacceptable in this factor will be found ineligible to proceed to Phase II unless corrected through discussions (if held).

Factor 2 – Experience:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The offeror shall demonstrate relevant experience with both aircraft hangar and BEQ construction projects, as detailed below.

The offeror shall submit the following information:

(1) Construction Experience:

Aircraft Hangar:

Submit a minimum of one (1) up to a maximum of three (3) relevant construction projects for the Offeror that best demonstrates your experience on relevant projects that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to the RFP. For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as:

Size/Scope: New construction of an aircraft maintenance hangar or high bay industrial/warehouse facility of 100,000 square feet or greater. Renovation projects will not be considered relevant.

Complexity: At least one project demonstrating experience meeting the above Size/Scope requirements must include aircraft parking apron and taxiways construction.

BEQ:

Submit a minimum of one (1) up to a maximum of two (2) relevant construction projects for the Offeror that best demonstrates your experience on relevant projects that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to the RFP. For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as:

Size/Scope/Complexity: New Construction of a multi-story (2 stories or greater) Bachelor Enlisted/Officer Quarters, Hotel, or Multifamily Residential facility of 50,000 square feet or greater. Renovation projects will not be considered relevant.

Large Project

Submit one (1) relevant construction projects for the Offeror that best demonstrates your experience on relevant projects that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to the RFP. For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as:

Size/Scope/Complexity: New Construction of a single facility, multiple facilities, compound, campus, installation, or complex with a construction cost of $200,000,000 or greater. Renovation projects will not be considered relevant. Additionally, projects submitted that only include horizontal, civil site work, single-system work, or demolition will not be considered relevant.

Projects submitted for the Offeror shall be completed within the past ten (10) years of the date of issuance of this RFP. Furthermore, the offeror must have been the prime contractor on the project. As such, the offeror’s experience as a subcontractor will not be considered. Further, subcontractor experience will not be considered.

A project is defined as a construction project performed under a single task order or contract. For multiple award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project;

rather Offerors shall submit the work performed under a task order as a project.

The attached Construction & Design Experience Project Data Sheet (Attachment C) is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information. If the same project is being used to demonstrate construction and design experience, submit separate Project Data Sheets for construction and design. . The Government reserves the right not to consider a project submitted for both construction and design experience on a single Project Data Sheet.

Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form nor will the Government consider information submitted via any other medium. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed one (1) double-sided page (or two (2) single-sided pages). The Government will not consider information submitted beyond this page limit.

For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy as defined above to the project requirements of this RFP (i.e., unique features, area, construction methods). In addition, the description should also address any sustainable features for the project, including specific descriptions of those features.

If the Offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), relevant project experience should be submitted for projects completed by the Joint Venture entity. If the Joint Venture does not have shared experience, projects may be submitted for the Joint Venture members. Offerors who fail to submit experience for all Joint Venture members may be rated lower.

Offerors are still limited to a total of three (3) Aircraft Hangar projects, two (2) BEQ projects, and one (1) Large Project combined.

If an Offeror is utilizing experience information of affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies (name is not exactly as stated on the SF1442), the proposal shall clearly demonstrate that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent firm will have meaningful involvement in the performance of the contract.

(2) Design Experience

Aircraft Maintenance Hangar:

Submit a minimum of one (1) up to a maximum of three (3) relevant design projects for the Designer of Record(s) that best demonstrates your experience on relevant projects that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to the RFP. For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as:

Size/Scope: Design of an aircraft maintenance hangar or high bay industrial/warehouse facility of 100,000 square feet or greater. Renovation projects will not be considered relevant.

Complexity: At least one project demonstrating experience meeting the above Size/Scope requirements must include aircraft parking apron and taxiways construction.

BEQ:

Submit a minimum of one (1) up to a maximum of two (2) relevant design projects for the Designer(s) of Record that best demonstrates your experience on relevant projects that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to the RFP. For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as:

Size/Scope/Complexity: Design of a multi-story (2 stories or greater) Bachelor Enlisted/Officer Quarters, Hotel, or Multifamily Residential facility of 50,000 square feet or greater. Renovation projects will not be considered relevant.

Large Project

Submit one (1) relevant construction projects for the Offeror that best demonstrates your experience on relevant projects that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to the RFP. For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as:

Size/Scope/Complexity: Design of the New Construction of a single facility, multiple facilities, compound, campus, installation, or complex with a construction cost of $200,000,000 or greater. Renovation projects will not be considered relevant. Additionally, projects submitted that only include horizontal, civil site work, single-system work, or demolition will not be considered relevant.

Projects submitted shall be completed within the past ten (10) years of the date of issuance of this RFP. For design-build projects, the design portion of the contract shall have been completed within the past ten (10) years of the date of issuance of this RFP. The design completion date shall be clearly stated on the Construction & Design Experience Project Data sheet under Block 4 next to “Design Completion Date.”

A project is defined as a complete design effort performed under a single task order or contract/subcontract. For multiple award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project; rather Offerors shall submit the work performed under a task order as a project.

The attached Construction & Design Experience Project Data Sheet (Attachment C) is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information. If the same project is being used to demonstrate construction and design experience, submit separate Project Data Sheets for construction and design. The Government reserves the right not to consider a project submitted for both construction and design experience on a single Project Data Sheet. Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form nor will the Government consider information submitted via any other medium. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed one (1) double-sided page (or two (2) single-sided pages). The Government will not consider information submitted beyond this page limit.

For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy as defined above to the project requirements of this RFP (i.e., unique features, area, construction methods). In addition, the description should also address any sustainable features for the project, including specific descriptions of those features. The project should clearly state which design office location performed the work.

If an Offeror is utilizing experience information of affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies (name is not exactly as stated on the SF1442), the proposal shall clearly demonstrate that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent firm will have meaningful involvement in the performance of the contract.

The Offeror may utilize experience of a design subcontractor to demonstrate design experience under this evaluation factor. The Offer must provide a supporting joint venture agreement, partnership agreement, teaming agreement, or letter of commitment and an explanation of the meaningful involvement for the design subcontractor. Offerors proposing multiple design firms should submit relevant project experience for all design firms. Failure to do so may result in a lower rating. Offerors are still limited to a total of three (3) Aircraft Hangar projects, two (2) BEQ projects, and one (1) Large Project combined.

(b) Basis of Evaluation:

The basis of evaluation will include the Offeror’s demonstrated experience and depth of experience in performing relevant construction and design projects as defined in the solicitation submittal requirements. The assessment of the Offeror’s relevant experience will be used as a means of evaluating the capability of the Offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP. The Government will only review three (3) Aircraft Hangar, two (2) BEQ projects, and one (1) Large Project for construction and three (3) Aircraft Hangar, two (2) BEQ projects, and one (1) Large Project for design. Any projects submitted in excess of the first three (3) Aircraft Hangar, first two (2) BEQ projects, and first Large Project for Construction Experience and first three (3) Aircraft Hangar, first two (2) BEQ projects, and first Large Project for Design Experience will not be considered.

Relevant projects where the Offeror and the proposed design firm(s) have previously worked together may be considered more favorably than those that have not worked together.

Relevant projects that demonstrate design-build experience may be considered more favorably than those that do not have design-build experience.

Relevant projects that demonstrate experience with constructing multiple buildings concurrently or sequentially at a campus, compound, installation, or complex may be considered more favorably than those that do not.

Relevant design projects that were performed by the specific design office identified in Factor 1 may be considered more favorably.

Factor 3 – Past Performance:

The following applies to both the aircraft hangar and BEQ projects.

If a completed Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) evaluation is available, it shall be submitted with the proposal for each project included in Factor 2 for Construction Experience. If a completed Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) evaluation is available, it shall be submitted with the proposal for each project included in Factor 2 for Design Experience. If there is not a completed CPARS evaluation, then submit Past Performance Questionnaires (Attachment F) for each project included in Factor 2 for both Construction Experience and Design Experience. The Offeror should provide completed Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ) in the proposal. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation. Offerors are permitted in include previously completed PPQs for Factor 2 projects vice requiring clients to complete PPQs again. If the Offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a client for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the Offeror shall complete and submit with the proposal the first page of the PPQ, which will provide contract and client information for the respective project(s). The Government may make reasonable attempts to contact the client noted for that project(s) to obtain the PPQ information. However, Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to help ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. If the client requests, questionnaires may be submitted directly to the Government’s point of contact, John Bishop, john.p.bishop1@navy.mil.

Offerors are highly encouraged to provide any information on problems encountered and the corrective actions taken on projects submitted under Factor 2 – Experience. Additionally, Offerors are highly encouraged to address any adverse past performance issues. Explanations shall not exceed two (2) double-sided pages (or four (4) single-sided pages) in total. Information provided beyond this page limit will not be considered.

The Government reserves the right to contact references for verification or additional information. The Government’s inability to contact any of the Offeror’s references or the references’ unwillingness to provide the information requested may affect the Government’s evaluation of this factor.

Performance award or additional information submitted will not be considered.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation:

This evaluation will consider how well the Offeror’s team performed on relevant projects submitted under Factor 2 – Experience and may also consider past performance on other projects currently documented in known sources.

The Government will consider the recency and relevance of the information, the source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in the Contractor’s performance. This evaluation is separate and distinct from the Contracting Officer’s responsibility determination. The assessment of the Offeror’s team’s past performance will be used as a means of evaluating the Offeror’s team’s probability to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP.

Offerors lacking relevant past performance history will receive a NEUTRAL Confidence rating.

Factor 4 – Technical Solution

(a) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

Provide a narrative describing the technical solution to the project that meets the requirements of the RFP. A technical narrative is required for each of the Projects included in this MILCON Package: P695F, CNATT Classroom Building Replacement; P707F, Bachelor Enlisted Quarters Replacement; P378F, CH-53K Maintenance Hangar Replacement; and P728F, C-12W Aircraft Maintenance Hangar Replacement. The description shall include the following systems:

o Architectural o Building structure o Building envelope o Mechanical Systems and DDC Controls to include accessibility to Mechanical room and circulation within the mechanical system.

o Electrical and Communication Systems infrastructure.

o Resiliency to include cyber secure EMCS integration, utility metering and controls o Anti-terrorism/force protection (ATFP) features o General concept proposed to meet sustainability and low impact development (LID).

o Site layout to include improvements and/or efficient use of sites.

o Special systems.

Provide concept drawings for: P378F, CH-53K Maintenance Hangar Replacement

Concept drawings shall include:

o Site Plan including primary facilities, roadways, parking, emergency vehicle access, and ATFP standoff distances.

o Floor Plan including interior circulation, adjacencies, square footage and mechanical spaces.

Narrative shall not exceed two (2) double-sided pages (or four (4) single-sided pages) for each MILCON project included in the Package. Include up to a total of six (6) conceptual drawings for P378F to supplement the narrative.

The Government will not consider information submitted beyond this page limit, but the conceptual drawings are not included in the limit.

(b) Basis of Evaluation:

The Government will evaluate the narrative and conceptual drawings considering the extent to which the Offeror demonstrates a clear understanding of the architectural and engineering requirements of the project. The Government will evaluate the Offeror's technical solution to determine adherence to or enhancing of the technical requirements of the RFP.

The narrative does not require the identification of specific subcontractors. However, if the Offeror identifies a specific subcontractor to perform major or critical aspects of the requirement to demonstrate an acceptable technical solution under this evaluation factor, the proposal must provide a letter of commitment and explanation of the meaningful involvement that the subcontractor will have in performance of this contract.

NOTE: The awardee’s proposed Concept drawings may be incorporated into the contract and may be subject to change at the project CDW.

Factor 5 – Project Management Approach

(a) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

Provide a narrative describing the project management approach that meets the requirements of the RFP. Organize the narrative into three parts to address the following:

(1) Management Team

- Management of the multiple and concurrent construction sites included in this RFP.

- Plan for securing, managing, and maintaining subcontracted labor for this RFP.

- Provide a chart and accompanying narrative to demonstrate the management hierarchy (by position) of the entire Package and each individual project to include both the design and construction teams. This narrative shall include authorities; roles; responsibilities; and a brief synopsis of the names, education, training and experience of key individuals based on the proposed management structure. (Note: Key individuals may vary among offerors based on the proposed management structure.)

(2) Mechanical Systems

- HVAC and Direct Digital Control (DDC) installation and performance verification plan to ensure a sound design. Narrative shall address contractor’s plan to ensure the DDC connects and communicates appropriately with the existing energy management control system (EMCS).

- Quality control approach to mechanical and DDC systems in design, construction, and project closeout phase. Narrative shall include how DOR will be involved in this approach.

- Narrative shall include the name of the proposed Mechanical Engineer who will be responsible for the design of the Mechanical Systems; as well as a brief synopsis of his or her education, training, and related experience with similar facilities.

- Management of commissioning process.

(3) Safety Program

- Describe the plan for safety that will be implemented to evaluate safety performance of potential subcontractors as part of the selection process for all levels of subcontractors.

- Fully describe the safety management system that they will use to oversee the safety compliance and performance of self-performed and subcontractor performed work.

- Describe any innovative methods that will be employed to ensure and monitor safe work practices at self-performed and/or all subcontractor levels.

- Describe methodology to execute an effective safety program that facilitates sound mishap prevention techniques and processes, employee reporting of unsafe conditions, unsafe activities, and near-miss mishaps.

(4) Schedule: In addition to the above narrative, the offeror shall:

- Project Specific Master Schedules:

� Include a Master Schedule for each Project included in this Package (list of Projects below).

Each Project Master Schedule shall include a high level schedule with major milestones, for both design and construction on the critical path.

� Include a duration for each Project from contract award.

� Offeror is required to complete Attachment H and include it in their proposal for this factor.

In the event of a discrepancy between the Attachment H duration from award and the narrative duration from award, the Attachment H duration from award will govern.

Attachment H is not included in the page limit restrictions. NOTE: The awardee’s proposed project duration from award for each Project will be incorporated into the contract. Upon award, each project will have a separate completion date.

- Package Master Schedule:

� Include one Package Master Schedule that addresses the design and construction of all buildings within the Package is required. The Package Master Schedule shall include a high level schedule with major milestones, for both design and construction, on the critical path

� The Package Master Schedule shall demonstrate all projects being completed within 1,826 days of award.

� The proposed Package Master Schedule shall account for priority sequence listed below.

Project Number Project Title Package Priority P707F Bachelor Enlisted Quarters Replacement 1 P378F CH-53K Maintenance Hangar Replacement 2 P728F C-12W Aircraft Maintenance Hangar Replacement 3 P695F CNATT Classroom Building Replacement 4

The Narrative for elements (1) Management Team, (2) Mechanical Systems, and (3) Safety Program detailed above shall not exceed eight (8) double-sided pages (or 16 single-sided pages). Up to three (3) organizational charts may be provided to supplement the narrative. The Government will not consider information submitted beyond this page limit (which does not include the organizational charts).

The Narrative for element (4) Schedule detailed above shall not exceed one 11x17 sheet per Project Master Schedule and one 11x17 sheet for the Package Master Schedule.

(b) Basis of Evaluation:

(1) Management Team: The Government is seeking to determine that the Offeror has a defined management team identified to properly manage multiple projects and constructions sites simultaneously under this contract. A project management approaches that creatively puts people or processes in place to minimize potential construction delays may be considered more favorably.

(2) Mechanical Systems: The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s mechanical system approach to ensure design, construction, and project closeout are integral to the management approach of the Offeror to deliver a quality HVAC and Controls systems. A project management approach that emphasizes the quality of design, installation and testing of mechanical systems and controls integration may be considered more favorably.

(3) Safety Program: The Government will evaluate the narrative to determine the degree to which subcontractor safety performance will be considered in the selection of all levels of subcontractors on the upcoming project. The Government will evaluate the narrative to determine the degree to which innovations are being proposed that may enhance safety on this procurement and validate the contractor has addressed methodology to be used in the execution of an effective program that facilitates sound mishap prevention techniques/processes, employee reporting of unsafe conditions, unsafe activities, and near-miss mishaps.

(4) Schedule: The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s proposed schedule to ensure it is technically feasible within the designated construction completion date. The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s proposed completion date for each Project included in this Package. A schedule that phases individual building completion dates within the package so the Government can take beneficial occupancy earlier than the 1,826 days overall completion date may be considered more favorably.

Factor 6 – Small Business Utilization:

This factor assesses both the historical achievements in utilizing small business concerns as subcontractors and proposed small business participation and commitment strategies.

1. Achievements - Submit a narrative and supporting information, as follows:

a. All offerors shall submit a narrative, limited to one (1) double-sided page (or two (2) single-sided pages), to describe their achievements in supporting the Government’s policy to provide maximum practicable opportunities for small business (SB), veteran-owned small business (VOSB), service-disabled veteran-owned small business (SDVOSB), historically underutilized business zone (HUBZone) small business, small disadvantaged business (SDB), and…