Amendment 0009.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this amendment is to revise the technical electronic due date, revise the small business factor submission date, provide OCI Language, and provide responses to PPIs number 71, 184, 186, 214, 247, 337, 361, 366, 427, 441, 466-479, and 484.

See SF30 Block 14 Continuation Page.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 5

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 13-May-2020

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N4008519R9257

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

15-Nov-2019

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

13-May-2020

CODE

NAVFAC MID ATLANTIC

ACQUISITION CORE

9324 VIRGINIA AVENUE

NORFOLK VA 23511-3095

N40085 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N4008519R9257

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE (SF 30)

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 0009

This amendment hereby incorporates the following:

1. Extends the technical proposal due date to FRIDAY, 15 May 2020 at 1600 EST.

2. Provides Organizational Conflict of Interest Reminder

3. Updates the delivery information in accordance with the table below

4. Design/Specification Changes

5. Provides PPI responses

1. The Phase II Non-Price Electronic Proposal due date is changed to FRIDAY, 15 May 2020 at 1600 EST.

2. ORGANIZATIONAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST REMINDER

Per FAR subpart 9.5, offerors are to advise the Contracting Officers of any potential Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI), and provide a mitigation plan addressing any potential OCI, as appropriate, for the Contracting Officer’s review and assessment.

3. PROPOSAL DELIVERY

Proposal Due Dates

Phase II Non-Price Proposal – Electronic FRIDAY, 15 MAY 2020, 1600 EST Phase II Non-Price Proposal – Hard Copies WEDNESDAY, 20 MAY 2020, NOON EST Price Proposal – Electronic THURSDAY, 4 JUNE 2020, 1600 EST Price Proposal – Factor 6 (and All Attachments) and Attachment G Small Business Subcontracting Plan

FRIDAY, 5 JUNE 2020 1600 EST

Price Proposal – Hard Copies WEDNESDAY, 10 JUNE, NOON EST

The purpose of this Amendment is to revise the electronic proposal due date for: Phase II Non-Price Electronic Proposal and Factor 6, Small Business Utilization (and all attachments), AND Attachment G, Small Business Subcontracting Plan, in accordance with the above table.

All other Electronic and Hard copy due dates remain unchanged.

Offerors are advised that they shall include all contents of the Price Proposal (both electronic copy and hard copy) as detailed in Amendment 0006 in their electronic Price Proposal submission EXCEPT Factor 6 (and all attachments) AND Attachment G, Small Business Subcontracting Plan.

The Hard Copy proposal for Factor 6 shall still be included in the Price Proposal Hard Copy submission.

Additionally, the hard copy of Attachment G, Small Business Subcontracting Plan, shall be included in the Price Proposal Hard Copy submission. Requirements for Hard copy proposals can be found in Amendment 0006.

In accordance with the DOD Safe Proposal Delivery Instructions included in Amendment 0006, Offerors shall submit their proposal in response to Factor 6 – Small Business Utilization, including completed Attachment D – Small Business Subcontracting Record and Attachment E – Small Business Participation and Commitment Strategy, AND Attachment G, Small Business Subcontracting Plan, via DOD Safe Drop Off links. The Contract Specialist will provide a separate Drop Off link for the submission of Factor 6 (and all attachments) AND Attachment G, Small Business Subcontracting Plan, to the Offeror POCs that were previously provided.

In the completion of Attachment E – Small Business Participation and Commitment Strategy, Offerors shall ensure “3. Total Value of the proposal” matches the Total Price Proposed on the Price Proposal Form (this shall be calculated by adding all base CLINs, planned modifications CLINs, and option CLINs). Additionally in the complete of Attachment G – Small Business Subcontracting Plan, Offerors shall ensure “1.a Total Contract Value” matches the Total Price Proposed on the Price Proposal Form (this shall be calculated by adding all base CLINs, planned modifications CLINs, and option CLINs). The Offeror shall ensure that the amounts and percentages included in Attachment E are calculated in accordance with “3. Total value of the proposal.” Additionally, the Offeror shell ensure that the amounts and percentages included in Attachment G are calculated in accordance with “1.a Total Contract Value.”

Note: In accordance with FAR 52.219-9, Small Business Subcontracting Plans are subject to negotiation at the Contracting Officer’s request. At such time a Small Business Subcontracting Plan is finalized, the Offeror will be required to submit a finalized and corresponding Attachment E - Small Business Participation and Commitment Strategy.

Reminder: Hard copy proposals shall match electronic proposals. In the event of a discrepancy, the electronic proposals will govern.

4. DESIGN/SPECIFICATION CHANGES

On RFP, Part 2 – General Requirements

Delete specification section 01 32 17.05 20 Cost-Loaded Network Analysis Schedule (NAS) for Design-Build from the project.

On RFP, Part 3a/3c/3d (P378F, P728F, P695F), Section 6.0 Engineering System Requirements, ESR B30 Roofing, B301001 Steep Slope Roofing Systems

Revise the paragraph for 30 year roof warranty, as follows:

“Structural Standing Seam Metal Roof System (SSSMRS) Warranty Certificate. At the completion of the project furnish signed copies of the 5-year Warranty for Structural Standing Seam Metal Roof (SSSMR) System, a sample copy of which is attached to the PTS section, and the 30-year Manufacturer's Material Warranties, and the manufacturer's 30-year system weather-tightness warranty.”

On RFP, Part 3b BEQ, Section 6.0 Engineering System Requirements, ESR B30 Roofing, B301001 Steep Slope Roofing Systems

Add the following paragraph:

“Structural Standing Seam Metal Roof System (SSSMRS) Warranty Certificate. At the completion of the project furnish signed copies of the 5-year Warranty for Structural Standing Seam Metal Roof (SSSMR) System, a sample copy of which is attached to the PTS section, and the 30-year Manufacturer's Material Warranties, and the manufacturer's 30-year system weather-tightness warranty.”

On RFP, Part 3a/3b/3c/3d (all projects), Section 6.0 Engineering System Requirements, ESR D30 HVAC, General System Requirements

Revise the following paragraph to read, “Provide corrosion protection for ALL exterior HVAC equipment, including air-handling units (AHUs), heat exchanger coil surfaces, equipment casings, air-cooled water chiller coils, heat pumps, and air conditioning units that are exposed to the weather. Corrosion protection is also required on HVAC equipment within buildings that are subject to the outside weather conditions. Specifically, equipment requiring protection is defined as the first HVAC equipment (unit coils) met by the outside air in the supply air ductwork system. The corrosion protection must meet or exceed the requirements of a 6000 hour salt spray test in accordance with ASTM International (ASTM) B117. The specified capacities on the plans and specifications must be the capacities after the required corrosion protection coatings are applied. Specify manufacturer's standard off-the-shelfanti-corrosion options for "coastal" or "sea coast" installations that meet or exceed the requirements stated above.”

On RFP, Part 3a/3b/3c/3d (all projects), Section 6.0 Engineering System Requirements, ESR D30 HVAC, D309001 General Construction Items

Delete this sentence, “All design and installation of HVAC and piping systems must meet the seismic requirements of Seismic Design for Mechanical Systems dated May 2002, located in Part 6 ATTACHMENTS of this RFP package.”

On RFP, Part 3a/3c (CH53K & C12W Hangar projects), Section 6.0 Engineering System Requirements, ESR D30 HVAC, D304007 Exhaust Systems

Revise the following paragraph to read, “Provide factory painted finishes that are designed for 6000-hour duration test for outside equipment and for equipment bringing in outside air.”

On RFP, Part 3b/3d (BEQ & CNATT Projects), Section 6.0 Engineering System Requirements, ESR D30 HVAC, D304007 Exhaust Systems

Add the following paragraph, “Provide factory painted finishes that are designed for 6000-hour duration test for outside equipment and for equipment bringing in outside air.”

On RFP, Part 3b/3d (BEQ & CNATT Projects), Section 6.0 Engineering System Requirements, ESR B20 Exterior Enclosure

Revise these sections as follows, B2010 EXTERIOR WALLS

It is permissible for exterior walls to be load bearing or non-load bearing. Exterior load bearing walls must consist of any of the following construction types and comply with the architectural and functional requirements that follow this list (also refer to B201001 Exterior Closure section for inclusion of load bearing walls in the overall exterior closure design).

1) Reinforced concrete masonry (CMU)

2) Cast-in-place reinforced concrete

3) Site precast concrete (tilt-up)

4) Plant precast concrete

Exterior walls must incorporate the materials directed in the Camp Lejeune, Base Exterior Architectural Plan

(BEAP).

The primary exterior cladding material of the building must be modular brick per color and finish conforming to the BEAP, along with a water table as prescribed in the BEAP. If thin brick cladding is used, the color and finish of the brick must match as closely as possible to that indicated in the BEAP.

Brick detailing and design of the exterior wall must provide accent banding and design features at windows as prescribed in the BEAP.

Provide a cast-in-place, split-face masonry (used with veneer exterior wall closure) or precast concrete water table per the proportions shown in diagrams in the BEAP. If the cast in place option is chosen, the finish of the concrete is required to be a high quality, rubbed finish with a pattern mimicking CMU masonry joints.

Multiple options for providing the exterior wall system composed of the Exterior Closure and the Exterior Wall Backup Construction sections shown below.

B201001 EXTERIOR CLOSURE

The following are options for providing the exterior closure. The Contractor has the option to use these systems if energy code requirements and design aesthetics as prescribed in the BEAP are provided:

1) A brick/masonry veneer cavity wall exterior wall closure.

2) A precast concrete panel veneer exterior wall closure with applied thin brick. This system must be a barrier system with sealed joints.

3) A site precast tilt-up concrete exterior wall closure or cast in place concrete exterior wall closure (load bearing) with applied thin brick cladding. This exterior closure is a barrier system with sealed joints.

4) A plant precast and site assembled precast concrete exterior wall closure (load bearing) with applied thin brick cladding. This exterior closure is a barrier system with sealed joints.

All exterior closure wall options where the exterior wall concrete (precast or cast in place) is exposed to moisture (at the exterior face of the wall or the base of the wall) must be designed with a plant added admixture to prevent moisture migration within the concrete to prevent the failure of applied thin brick systems, and prevent water migration into the interior of the building. Thin brick placed on the exterior load bearing walls must be attached with systems that will ensure that the brick will not separate from the wall or form efflorescence. In addition, adequate control/construction joints must be incorporated into the concrete wall system to prevent thin brick cracking and adhesion issues.

B201002 EXTERIOR WALL BACKUP CONSTRUCTION

The backup systems for masonry and precast concrete veneer systems must be of single wythe reinforced concrete masonry. The backup wall system must be integrated with other exterior wall system requirements as indicated in B201003, Insulation and Air Barriers.

Exterior bearing walls consisting of metal studs as the primary floor or roof supporting structural element are not permitted.

For concrete exterior bearing walls (precast or cast in place) the backup wall system is defined in ESR C10, Interior Construction.

(End of Summary of Changes)

SOLICITATION NO. N40085‐19‐R‐9252

PROJECT TITLE/LOCATION: HFRM PACKAGE 2

PREAWARD INQUIRY FORM (TEMPLATE)

Page Section Para.

71 4/1/2020

PART 3 ‐

CHAPTER

6 / ESR

B20

BEQ B2010

Exterior Walls

Part 3 BEQ P707 B2010 indicate a cavity exterior wall system.

B201001 states to comply with BEAP requirement.

In Package #2, the RFP allows an alternative to a cavity wall system such as an architectural precast system with thin brick which is “Camp LeJeune approved standard.”

Would such an alternative be acceptable for the buildings in this package?

See Amendment 0009 9

184 4/14/2020

VOL 2

AMEC

Report

Stormwater Regional BMP

Design Drawing C‐ 110 Note

Referenced drawing note states "Overhead power relocation must be coordinated with Duke Energy," but does not show new location of power line. In order for all offerors to propose on the same scope of work, please either (a) provide sketch indicating the new location of power line, (b) provide an estimated length of power line to be relocated under this contract, or (c) provide a unit price CLIN for relocation of power by number of new poles or unit length.

Contractor shall relocate the overhead line along the east side of the construction area up to 15' to the east as required by construction efforts and Duke Energy. Bid shall assume relocating 1750' of overhead line and trimming/removing 15' of trees along that path."

186 4/14/2020

VOL 2

AMEC

Report

Stormwater Regional BMP Design Drawing C‐ 110 Note

Referenced drawing note states "Overhead power relocation must be coordinated with Duke Energy," but does not show new location of power line. In order for all offerors to propose on the same scope of work, please either (a) provide sketch indicating the new location of power line, (b) provide an estimated length of power line to be relocated under this contract, or (c) provide a unit price CLIN for relocation of power by number of new poles or unit length.

See response to PPI # 184. 9

REFERENCE

Question No. QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSEDate Received

Posted on Amend No.

July 2011

PREAWARD INQUIRY FORM (TEMPLATE)

Page Section Para.

Question No. QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSEDate Received

Amend No.

31 of

VOL 1

01 31 19.05 20;

para 1.3.2.a

Volume 1, Specification 01 31 19.05 20 “Post Award Meetings” para 1.3.5.2.a.(2) states “prepare and submit, at least 14 days in advance of the Concept Design Workshop (CDW)…a CDW Preliminary Concept Design.” Subsequent para 1.3.5.2.a.(4) states “Incorporate government comments in a revised Concept #1 and produce at least 30 copies of the revised Concept #1 documents for distribution at the workshop.” Based on this there would be only 14 days (assumed calendar days) for: the Government to review Concept #1, the Government to return comments to the DB Contractor, the DB Contractor to incorporate the comments into “Revised Concept #1”, and the DB Contractor to produce necessary copies in preparation for the Concept Design Workshop. No Government review duration of the Preliminary Concept Design is indicated in the specification. Will the Government clarify their required review duration of Concept #1 given that there are only 14 calendar days for this process? Maybe the Government provide the review comments at the CDW day one and “Revised Concept #1” is not required on day one of the CDW?

The Government intends to provide comments within 7 days of receipt.

671,1103, 1323, and 1534 of

B301001; 07 61

15.00 20 Para 1.8

Applies to P378, P728, and P695. Specification 07 61 15.00 20 Aluminum Standing Seam Roofing para 1.8 states “warranty period shall be not less than 30 years from the date of Government acceptance of the work” while section B301001 Steep Slope Roofing Systems refers to “20‐year Manufacturer’s Material Warranties” and “manufacturer’s 20‐year system weather‐tightness warranty.” Please clarify SSMR roofing system warranty requirements and provide list of three acceptable manufacturers who can meet the requirements of Specification 07 61 15.00 20.

30 year warranty is required. 9

Part 3, P378 Chapter 6, D30

P378, Part 3, D309001

P378, Part 3, D30, section D309001 references seismic requirements must meet the "Seismic Design for Mechanical Systems data May 2002" however this document cannot be located in Part 6 ATTACHMENTS. Will this document be provided in a future Amendment?

This document is not required and reference removed from the RFP. See Amendment 0009.

361 4/21/2020 P728 Part 3 Chapter

6 / ESR

D30 / Section D304007

Please confirm factory finish durability requirements. The General System Requirements indicate 3,000 hour salt spray testing. However, this section indicates 5,000 hours.

This response supersedes the previous response in Amendment 0006.

Provide coatings capable of withstanding a 6,000 hour salt spray.

PREAWARD INQUIRY FORM (TEMPLATE)

Page Section Para.

Question No. QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSEDate Received

Amend No.

366 4/21/2020

P378 Part 3 Chapter

6 / ESR

D30 / Section D304007

Please confirm factory finish durability requirements. The General System Requirements indicate 3,000 hour salt spray testing. However, this section indicates 5,000 hours.

Provide coatings capable of withstanding a 6,000 hour salt spray.

See Amendment 0009.

427 4/21/2020 Attachme nt F Price Proposal Form

Please define the threshold concentrations for "PFAS Contaminated Soil" and "PFAS Contaminated Water" for bidding purposes

See PPI# 211. North Carolina currently does not have a regulatory levels in place. The EPA has established the following levels GW 70 ppt Soil – 1.26 mg/kg.

441 4/28/2020

01 32

17.00 20, 01 32

17.05 20

ALL PROJECTS

Two scheduling specification sections were provided in Part 2 of the RFP. Spec Section 01 32 17.00 20 par 1.10.2.9 and Section 01 32 17.05 20 par 1.6.2.4 both reference Weather Days to be based off of a 30 year NOAA Average with 0.10” precipitation parameter. Section 01 32 17.05 20 par 1.6.2.4 also gives a prescribed weather calendar that does not seem to align with historical data at the referenced 0.10” parameter. Carrying more weather days than necessary will artificially inflate the schedule duration and increase price.

Specification 01 31 19.05 20 paragraph 1.3.8 states to use 01 32

17.00 20 for the design and construction baseline guidelines.

Please confirm specification 01 32 17.05 20 is not applicable to this project.

See Amendment 0009 9

466 5/1/2020

1255 and 1259 of

VOL 1,

Part 3, CH 4, 5

Space Tabulation Table and 5.0 Room Requirements

(P695) Neither the Space Tabulation Table nor the Para 5.0 Room Requirements indicate occupancy of the Trainer spaces.

Will the Government provide expected occupancies and durations for the Trainer spaces in order to facilitate mechanical design?

For preliminary sizing follow ASHRAE

62.1 Table 6.2.2.1, Occupancy

Category “Wood/metal shop”, for occupant density. Validate actual occupancy density with user during design.

PREAWARD INQUIRY FORM (TEMPLATE)

Page Section Para.

Question No. QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSEDate Received

Amend No.

467 5/1/2020

1255 and 1259 of

VOL 1,

Part 3, CH 4, 5

Space Tabulation Table and 5.0 Room Requirements

(P695) Neither the Space Tabulation Table nor the Para 5.0 Room Requirements indicate heat dissipating equipment of the Trainer spaces. Will the Government provide expected heat disipation for the Trainer spaces in order to facilitate mechanical design?

Trainer spaces will house full size aircraft simulator and will include avionics systems, electrical systems, and hydraulic systems, diagnostic equipment, and misc. tools. Exact Heat dissipation and usage rates of these devices will need to be coordinate with user during design.

468 5/5/2020

BEQ Part 3 Section B1010

Regarding the BEQ ‐ Section B1010 states "Form deck or composite deck is not allowed, slab reinforcement shall be epoxy coated." Please confirm that epoxy‐coated reinforcing would only apply if using slab‐on‐metal‐deck. Please confirm that epoxy‐coating is not required for tendons, rebar, or welded‐wire‐ mesh in hollow‐core precast floor planks or in the concrete topping on the hollow‐core precast floor planks at the BEQ.

1. A slab on metal deck is not allowed, only a cast in place concrete flat slab with epoxy coated reinforcement is allowed.

2. If precast planks are used in lieu of a flat cast in place concrete slab, the structural tendons or reinforcement shall be epoxy coated but the topping slab may be reinforced with fibermesh.

469 5/5/2020

Part 3, Chapter 4 space tabulation . Part 3, Chatper 5 room data sheets.

P378

P378 space tabulation includes 3 "Vault" rooms for the O2 space at 320 SF each, 1 in each squadron.

There was no room data sheet provided for a vault, but instead there is a "Secure Room" data sheet for the O2 space also at 320 SF each. The wall construction is indicated to be gypsum board with metal stud. Ceiling finish is noted to comply with MCO 5530.14A.

Please confirm the Secure Room data sheet requirements govern for the construction of this space and the term "vault" can be removed from the Part 4 space tabulation, replaced with "Secure Room."

Correct, the Secure Room data sheet requirements dictate the construction of the "Vault" and "Vault" can be replaced with "Secure Room" in the Space Tabulation.

470 5/5/2020 Part 2, 01 33 29.05 20, 1.4.a.

ALL PROJECTS

Part 2, 01 33 29.05 20, 1.4.a. says “Refer to Attachment 1, HPSB Checklist at the end of this specification section. (Multiple checklists indicate multiple buildings that require HPSB tracking.)

We do not see these checklists; please provide.

See response to PPI #223. 9

PREAWARD INQUIRY FORM (TEMPLATE)

Page Section Para.

Question No. QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSEDate Received

Amend No.

471 5/5/2020

Part 2, 01 33 29.05 20, 1.6

ALL PROJECTS

Part 2, 01 33 29.05 20, 1.6 DOCUMENTATION REQUIREMENTS does not mention daylighting, though it is typical for NAVFAC RFPs to do so here. Part 3 B2020 indicates: “Provide windows in each area of the building that is regularly occupied, to enhance the working environment, without compromising visual acuity and comfort. Natural daylighting is preferred, except at the second level between the administrative areas and the hangar bay.” Documents in Part 6 mention maximizing opportunities for daylighting, but also give no quantitative requirements. Please confirm any quantitative daylighting requirements for the project.

Projects are required to comply with UFC 1‐200‐02 per the RFP, Part 3, Section 2.3.1, Project Objectives, Project Specific Priorities, Sustianable Design and Construction. Daylighting section 2‐5.2 of UFC references required Guiding Principle requirements for daylighting in Office Spaces and Classrooms. These requirements should be used in the final design of the building and can either be prescriptive or performance based.

472 5/5/2020

P378 Part 3, Chapter 5, 5.0 Room Requirem ents

P378

Per Amendment 6, question No. 379, in response to the Aviation Ordinance, the Goverment response was exterior access is a mandoatory requirement. Per the room requirements the Aviation Ordinance has to have access to the Hangar as well as the exterior. This is not possible for Squadron 2 without a corridor. Please confirm that the use of an 8'‐0" wide corridor is another acceptable means of access to the exterior provided that double doors are used or a corridor can be used for access to the Hangar.

Yes, a 8'‐0" wide corridor is an acceptable means of access to the exterior.

473 5/5/2020

Amendme nt 5, Question No. 148

P707

The government response to question 148 in Amendment 5 is unclear. PART 3 ‐ CHAPTER 5 ‐ Page 20 states "GC to provide washers and dryers as part of the construction contract."

Washers and dryers typically are part of the FF&E package which is funded separately from the construction contract. Please confirm if the washers and dryers are funded from the base construction contract or separately?

See response to question 442. 9

PREAWARD INQUIRY FORM (TEMPLATE)

Page Section Para.

Question No. QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSEDate Received

Amend No.

474 5/5/2020

Amendme nt 5, Question No. 148

ALL PROJECTS

The government response to question 148 in Amendment 5 is unclear. The RFP states that FF&E and A/V Packages will be funded separately from the construction contract. The room requirement sections commonly state to "provide" FF&E. An example is P378 Aviation Ordinance room states "Provide (3) workstations, (3) tiered industrial racks for gun mounts." Please confirm if FF&E is funded from the base construction contract or separately when the room requirement sections states "provide"?

The FF&E and A/V products/items are not funded with base construction contract funds. The FFE & AV funding will be developed and finalized during the project. Equipment or items that are bolted/fastened to a surface are not considered FFE and are to be included in the base contract.

The FFE/interiors and A/V design to produce and complete the FF&E and A/V packages is funded with base construction contract funds.

475 5/5/2020

Part 3, ESR

D209090

P378

Part 3, Chapter 6, D209009 states "Each squadron will have a portion of the hangar bay dedicated to a wash area (3 total for hangar). Wash rack should be in an area to prevent overspray to other squadrons or operations." Chapter 5 room requirements of the Hangar bay states "Provide (1) wash rack per squadron within hangar bay." Please confirm the following regarding the wash racks:

1.Please confirm wash racks located inside P378 Hangar are to be GFGI and bidders are to provide piping to the wash rack location.

2.Please provide government specifica ons for the wash racks.

(pressure, flow, temperatures, chemicals required, etc.)

3.Please clarify if a hot water hose bib is required in addi on to a cold water hose bib. Hot water is listed as optional in UFC 4‐ 211‐01, section 3‐13.3.

Please refer to PPI response 240 for requirements in the wash bays.

PREAWARD INQUIRY FORM (TEMPLATE)

Page Section Para.

Question No. QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSEDate Received

Amend No.

476 5/5/2020

Part 3 Chapter 3

P728 Hangar

Please clarify if the existing water lines (6" and 4") within the project limits need to be relocated/reconnected as part of the project as the new hangar will impact portions of those lines.

Per section 3.2.8.1, "it is expected that these lines will have sufficient flow and pressure to serve the domestic and fire protection requirements of the project". Also, in Part 6, Attachment B, Concept Demolition Plan CD101, the water lines are not shown to be demolished. Please clarify if the water lines need to be removed and reconnected or if they can be removed and capped?

Based on the GIS utility data, the setback required to site the Hangar from the Taxiway, should allow the 6"/4" main to remain.

477 5/5/2020

Part 3, Chapter 6

P378

Chapter 6 ESR D2040 states that "External gutters and downspouts will discharge to daylighted splashpads." The civil engineering UFC 3‐201‐01 Chapter 3‐3 for Roof Drainage states "Eliminate safety hazards such as ice, ponding, and flooding in pedestrian and vehicular traffic areas." Please confirm roof drainage shall discharge directly into storm piping underground and not be allowed to discharge at grade where it will travel over sidewalks and other paved areas.

Roof drainage shall be design based on file Hangar, site layout, and storm water discharge design.

478 5/8/2020 P378 Part 3, Chapter

6 ESR

D50 & G40

Apron lighting will be provided around the hangar building only.

Please confirm that any new lighting for the aircraft parking apron, with the exception of coordination with Duke Electric for removal and relocation of existing lighting, is by Duke Electric.

Contractor is responsible for all modifications to the apron lighting.

479 5/8/2020 P378, Amendme nt 6, PPI 330.

P378

AM6, RFI 330 response stated that the P378 stormwater pond and lift station design CAD files are not available. Please confirm for bidding purposes that bidders should assume CAD files will be provided at notice of award.

CAD files are not available. 9

PREAWARD INQUIRY FORM (TEMPLATE)

Page Section Para.

Question No. QUESTION GOVERNMENT RESPONSEDate Received

Amend No.

484 5/13/2020

Amendme nt 006

1. Proposal Delivery

Amendment 0006 changed the price proposal delivery requirement to Thursday, 4 June 2020, Time EST., inclusive of factor 05 price and the Small Business Subcontracting Plan.

Can the proposal delivery requirements be modified so that the submission of the Small Business Subcontracting Plan is submitted the following day? Friday, 5 JUNE 2020, 1600 TIME

EST.

This change will allow for better criteria alignment between the price proposal and Small Business Subcontractoring Plan.

See Amendment 0009 9