(2) P1346B-1280B-Pre-Proposal-Inquiry-Log.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 20 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N4008519R9146
About this file
This document contains a pre-proposal inquiry log and questions and answers related to solicitation number N40085-19-R-9146. The solicitation is for a firm-fixed price design-bid-build construction contract for Birch Street Road Improvements at Marine Corps Base Camp Lejeune in North Carolina. Key details include questions from offerors regarding project specifications and plans, such as quality control requirements, work hour restrictions, pricing clarification, design details, and treatment of unknown site conditions. The Navy provided responses to clarify the requirements for the roadway widening and repair work. The winning contractor must complete the project within 555 calendar days of award.
View the file
Other files
Show all 45
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sheet1
| Question No. | Date Received | REFERENCE | QUESTION | GOVERNMENT RESPONSE | Posted on Amend No. | ||
| Page | Section | Para. | |||||
| 1 | 8/7/20 | 01 45 00.00 20 | 1.5.1.1 | 01 45 00.00 20/1.5.1.1 Specifications state the following” Qc Manager may perform the duties of the project superintendent”. With the size scope and complexity of the project would the government consider making the QC position a stand-alone position? | Bid per RFP | ||
| 2 | 8/7/20 | 01 14 00 | 1.3.4 | 01 14 00/1.3.4 Specifications include an exclusionary period of 6am to 8 am and 3 pm until 6pm stating that no work may be performed during these hours. Is the government intending to grant a time extension to the contract for the time it will take to complete the work from Parachute to Holcomb based on lost production time or will a closure of this section be granted to complete the work? | No | ||
| 3 | 8/7/20 | Attachment D Price schedule | Attachment D Price schedule states “. Award will be made on the total sum of Contract Line Items 0001, 0002, 0003, 0004, 0005, 0006, 0007, 0008, 009, 0010, 0011 and 0012. For Items 0011 and 0012, enter unit prices and extended totals in spaces provided. If there is a difference between a unit price and the extended total, the unit price will be held to be the intended bid and the total recomputed accordingly. If an Offeror provides a total but fails to enter a unit price, the total divided by the specified quantity will be held to be the intended unit price.” However the pricing sheets shown in the body of the RFP do not convey this. Can the government clarify that award will be based on the prices of Base bid CLIN 001A thru 001F plus all 11 options combined. | Yes award will be based on the prices of Base bid CLIN 001A thru 001F plus all 11 options combined. | |||
| 4 | 8/7/20 | CD102 | CD102 shows four structures marked with Demo Legend Notes “X “ Structure to be Removed. Two of the structures marked with a X are also labeled “Works Notes 2 Adjust Structure Rim Elevation.” Are those structures to be removed and replaced or adjusted? | The sanitary structure castings are to be adjusted to finished grade. Replace drainage structures where indicated on the proposed plan sheets. | |||
| 5 | 8/7/20 | CD102 | CD102 shows 18” & 30” storm pipe marked with Demo Legend symbol // Utility to be Removed. These storm pipes are also labeled “Work Notes 1 Protect Utility … not shown to be removed…” | Remove the structures and piping shown. | |||
| 6 | 8/7/20 | CP117 | CP117 Shows Catch Basin 708 at Sta. 705+15 on Holcomb Blvd. CD117 shows work starting at Sta. 706+23.26. Advise? | Remove curb and gutter for proposed drainage improvements in this area. | |||
| 7 | 8/7/20 | CD119 | CD119 Is there any asbestos handling or removal associated with demolishing the existing steam line and vault? | Not at this time. | |||
| 8 | 8/7/20 | CP119 | CP119 Tank X-ING “Extend proposed crossing to be of similar likeness to existing crossing.” What is the existing crossing? Are there details? Are there specs? | For bidding purposes, assume 12" thick 4,000 PSI concrete, No. 5 bars 12" O.C. both ways. | |||
| 9 | 8/7/20 | CD116 | Work Note 4 | CD116 Work Note 4 Removal & Relocate Electrical Equipment. Are these Duke Energy powerlines? Is the cost for relocating all powerlines, poles, and equipment to put in the bid? | Disregard work note 4 on sheet CD116. Removal of power poles will be handled by others. | ||
| 10 | 8/7/20 | CLIN0008 | CLIN0008/Price for Task 1300 Repair Existing Erosion, complete in accordance with the drawings and specifications. What are the defining scopes of work? Where on the plan sheets is this work labeled? Please describe in detailed what is required for pricing. | All work within the dashed boundary shown on sheet CC102 associated with CLIN 1300, not including roadway work or guardrail. | |||
| 11 | 8/7/20 | 01 45 00.00 20 | 1.5.1.1 | 01 45 00.00 20/1.5.1.1 Specifications state the following” Qc Manager may perform the duties of the project superintendent”. With the size scope and complexity of the project would the government consider making the QC position a stand-alone position? | See PPI 1. | ||
| 12 | 8/7/20 | 01 14 00 | 1.3.4 | 01 14 00/1.3.4 Specifications include an exclusionary period of 6am to 8 am and 3 pm until 6pm stating that no work may be performed during these hours. Is the government intending to grant a time extension to the contract for the time it will take to complete the work from Parachute to Holcomb based on lost production time or will a closure of this section be granted to complete the work? | See PPI 2. | ||
| 13 | 8/7/20 | Attachment D | Attachment D Price schedule states “. Award will be made on the total sum of Contract Line Items 0001, 0002, 0003, 0004, 0005, 0006, 0007, 0008, 009, 0010, 0011 and 0012. For Items 0011 and 0012, enter unit prices and extended totals in spaces provided. If there is a difference between a unit price and the extended total, the unit price will be held to be the intended bid and the total recomputed accordingly. If an Offeror provides a total but fails to enter a unit price, the total divided by the specified quantity will be held to be the intended unit price.” However the pricing sheets shown in the body of the RFP do not convey this. Can the government clarify that award will be based on the prices of Base bid CLIN 001A thru 001F plus all 11 options combined. | See PPI 3. | |||
| 14 | 8/7/20 | Sheet CC118 | Sheet CC118 Shows the median as permanent sodding and Sheet CP118 shows the same median as concrete. Please advise? | Material shall be concrete. | |||
| 15 | 8/7/20 | Would like to request 2 week push in the proposal due date | Bid due date will remain unchanged. | ||||
| 16 | 8/5/20 | C-003 thru C-013 |
CC100 thru CC120
| CC500 | On Typical Section sheets C-003 thru C-013 the fill material on the shoulders and behind curbs is shown only as T, select material. However, sheets CC100 thru CC120 General Note 4 states "areas of disturbance outside the limits of new pavement shall be permanently restored with 4" of Topsoil and permanent sod. Also, sheet CC500 Note 7, states 6" Topsoil on all cut/fill slopes. Can you please clarify? Also, can consideration be given to allowing use of existing soil on the job site as shoulder material or material behind the curbs in lieu of select material? | Provide 6" topsoil. | |||||
| 17 | 8/7/20 | Various Sheets | On demolition plans where it says to sawcut approximately 1' in from the edge of pavement, remove the 1' of pavement and mill the remaining width of the roadway, is it acceptable to mill to the edge of pavement? This will save the government both time and money. The loss of 1' of the existing travel lane will make it even more difficult to maintain the minimum 10' travel lanes. | Bid per the plans. | |||
| 18 | 8/7/20 | CP100 | After visiting the project site, it appears that the existing power poles from approximately STA 208+00 to STA 210+00 will be in the way on constructing the new swale. In the event these existing power poles, and others throughout the project, are in the way of construction, will the government be responsible for relocating them? | Assume poles to remain, with grading adjusted. No net increase in material. | |||
| 19 | 8/7/20 | CD113 | There are numerous existing light poles along the edge of Wallace Creek Road that the plans call to be removed and relocated. Will the contractor be allowed the close off Wallace Creek Road from STA 500+50 to STA 508+50 in order to safely remove there light poles? | Bid per plans. | |||
| 20 | 8/7/20 | C001 | The General Notes state that the contractor willl have to provide footing details for the existing light poles that are to be relocated. Can a detail for the minimum foundation requirements be provided? If not, can pole information such as height and make/model be provided so that the proper calculations can be made when deciding on what type of foundation is necessary. | For bidding purposes, assume 30" Diameter X 12' below grade, 2' above grade footings, 4,000 PSI concrete, with No. 5 bar cage 10" O.C.. The awarded contractor is responsible for providing details for review and approval per the plans. | |||
| 21 | 8/7/20 | C003 to C0013 | In areas that call for minimal widening, for example Birch St. STA 252+95.79 to STA 255+38.36, is B25.0C Asphalt acceptable to use in lieu of Aggregate Base Course? | No. | |||
| 22 | 8/7/20 | CD119 | Note 8 on sheet CD119 states to "Remove Existing Steam Vault." There is no other information provided about this steam vault. There are known to be numerous, large steam vaults throughout the installation. Please provide more information regarding the size, material and location of this existing steam vault. | Not available at this time. Price accordingly. | |||
| 23 | 8/7/20 | There is no existing concrete pavement mentioned in the geotechnical report, nor was any visible during the site visit. In the event that existing concrete pavement is discovered during the full depth removal of the existing asphalt pavement, will the contractor be given additional compensation for these unforeseen existing conditions? | Yes. | ||||
| 24 | 8/7/20 | TC001 | There is very minimal information regarding Traffic Control in this RFP. The contractor will have to contract a traffic control engineering firm to design their own Traffic Control Plan and submit it to the Contracting Officer for approval. Does the time that it takes to design the Traffic Control Plan and get approval from the Contracting Officer count towards the 555 days allowed to complete this RFP? | Yes. | |||
| 25 | 8/7/20 | S500 | Please provide Concrete Specifications for the Retaining Wall that is depicted on sheet S500. | Provide concrete per section 03 30 00 cast in place concrete proviided. | |||
| 26 | 8/7/20 | Please provide specifications for the Signals that are to be installed as part of this RFP. | All required information is provided on the plans. | ||||
| 27 | 8/7/20 | CP504, C004, CP100 | On the roadway plan for Birch St. STA 212+07, it calls for a keyed in concrete island. Detail C1 on sheet CP504 also shows asphalt pavement under the concrete island. The typical section for this portion of Birch St. on sheet C004 shows select material under the concrete island. Please confirm. | Utilize detail C1 on sheet CP504 - "Paved Concrete Island" | |||
| 28 | 8/7/20 | 5 | 01 14 00 | 6 | Page 5 paragraph 6 of Section 01 14 00 of the Project Specifications states that, "No work must be performed between Parachute Road and Holcomb Boulevard during the hours of 6:00 AM to 8:00 AM and 3:00 PM to 6:00 PM… This period has not been considered in computing the time allowed for the performance of this contract." Does this Exclusionary Period include only the work on Birch St. between Parachute Road and Holcomb Boulevard, or all work that is part of this RFP between Parachute Road and Holcomb Boulevard? | The referenced restriction applies to the entire project limits. | |
| 29 | 8/7/20 | On July 30, 2020 a site visit was hosted by Lt. Mark Shaw. Can a list of attendees and any minutes from that meeting be provided on beta. SAM? | See Amendment 002. | ||||
| 30 | 8/7/20 | RFP Price options | The Traffic Control Notes and Staging Notes describe in concept the design and use of temporary signals, barriers, and pavement markings to facilitate the construction. With almost 3 feet of pavement structure under the widening and the full depth repair, the comprehensive traffic control plan designed and priced will have to be designed to accomplish this widening and full depth repair per the plans. This cost will be there if even only one of CLIN options 1-6 are opted for. Will the government consider consolidating these options, or eliminating them all together? | No | |||
| 31 | 8/7/20 | On sheet TC002, Project note B states |
No Lane Closures are Permitted during the following peak times:
Birch Street between STA 245+00 and Holcomb Boulevard- 5am to 5 PM (Night Work Only) However in spec section 01 14 00 1.3.4 Exclusionary Period No work must be performed between Parachute Road and Holcomb Boulevard, during the hours of 6:00 AM to 8:00 AM and 3:00 PM to 6:00 PM, without prior written approval of the Contracting Officer.
Can you please clarify?
| Confirmed. Maintain a minimum on one traffic lane for each direction. | |||
| 32 | 8/7/20 | Are there cross sections for the roadway between Taco Bell and Wendy's ? | No. |
| 33 | 8/7/20 | Can material hauled to the landfill be hauled back to the jobsite if needed? | No. |
| 34 | 8/7/20 | On sheet TC002, stage 10, step 1, the plans state to construct temporary |
pavement where existing median was removed -Is there a typical section for this temporary pavement?
| Use detail A3 on sheet CP500 | |||
| 35 | 8/7/20 | Is there a drawing showing this temporary pavement? | Use detail A3 on sheet CP500 |
| 36 | 8/7/20 | On sheets XS611, XS612 and XS613 a geotechnical report is referenced. Can we |
get a copy of this report?
| Geotechnical report will be provided after award. | |||
| 37 | 8/7/20 | Can we work on multiple stages/sections at the same time? | S/C please confirm. |
BMcD - Only if traffic is maintained.
38 8/7/20 For the work from Sta 255+38 to Sta 276+89 can lane closures be kept in place as long as a 10' lane is maintained in each direction during non-work hours?
| Yes. | |||
| 39 | 8/10/20 | Birch Street Road Improvements will not print in their entirety and are very difficult to manipulate. It appears that sheets 3 and 4 are the main issues, but all sheets that are part of Volume 1 are very difficult to use. Requesting a useable set of drawings for this RFP. | See Amendment 002. |
| 40 | 8/10/20 | on sheet CP705 there are no station numbers. Requesting a revised sheet CP705. | See Amendment 002. |
| 41 | 8/11/20 | There are two separate bid forms provided by the government for this solicitation. The bid form included with the RFP is not the same as the Bid Schedule entitled, “Attachment D Price Proposal Form.” Please clarify which bid form is to be used for this solicitation. | Use Attachment D. |
| 42 | 8/11/20 | Option Items 0002 to 00010 call for a full depth repair of the existing roadway. Please confirm that it is the government’s intent to remove the existing roadway in its entirety, and put back 18” of select material, 8” of aggregate base course, 4” B25.0C asphalt, 3” I19.0C asphalt and 1.5” S9.5C asphalt within the station ranges listed on the Bid Schedule. | Confirmed. |
SOLICITATION NO. N40085-19-R-9146
PROJECT TITLE/LOCATION: P1346B/P1280B, Birch Street Road Improvements/Birch Street North MCB, Camp Lejeune, NC PREAWARD INQUIRY FORM (TEMPLATE)
July 2011
Sheet2
Sheet3
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .