Amendment_0006.pdf

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment your desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FACILITY CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION

NO.

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NO.

IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15C. DATE SIGNED

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)

CODE

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

Previous edition unusable

SOLICITATION NO. N40085-19-R-9057 DESIGN-BID-BUILD (DBB) P-106 SUBMARINE PROPULSOR MANUFACTURING

SUPPORT FACILITY, PHILADELPHIA NAVY YARD, PHILADELPHIA, PA

The purpose of this amendment is provide additional answers to Pre-Proposal Inquiries (PPI's). The proposal due date of Tuesday, 07 May 2019 NLT 2:00 PM EDT remains unchanged.

See Continuation Page(s).

NAVFAC MID-ATLANTIC

ACQUISITION CORE

9324 VIRGINIA AVENUE

NORFOLK, VA 23511-3095

SEE ITEM 6

J

N40085-19-R-9057

1 10

05/03/2019

03/21/2019

05/03/2019

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE (SF 30)

CONTINUATION SHEET

ATTACHMENT H - PRICE PROPOSAL FORM

CLIN 0001AG: Delete “3” from the No. Units and replace with “4”.

CLIN 0001AI: Delete “7” from the No. Units and replace with “6”.

DIVISION 07 THERMAL AND MOISTURE PROTECTION

SECTION 07 81 00 SPRAY-APPLIED FIREPROOFING

Paragraph 1.2.2: In the “Fire Rating Schedule Office/Administration Building Only” table, delete “N 925” from the

UL Design Reference for Floor supports and replace with “D925”.

Contractor

PPI#

Section of RFP or Page

Number

Paragraph

Reference

Drawing

Number Question RESPONSE

Volume 2

Cybersecurity 1.3.9.a.

What is the CIA impact level for the Section 14 24

23 HYDRAULIC

PASSENGER

ELEVATORS?

The CIA impact level will be assigned by NAVFAC at a later date.

Volume 2

Cybersecurity 1.3.9.b.

What is the CIA impact level for the Section 21 30

00 FIRE PUMPS?

The CIA impact level will be assigned by NAVFAC at a later date.

Volume 2

Cybersecurity 1.3.9.c.

What is the CIA impact level for the Section 23 09

00 INSTRUMENTATION

AND CONTROL FOR

HVAC?

The CIA impact level will be assigned by NAVFAC at a later date.

Volume 2

Cybersecurity 1.3.9.d.

What is the CIA impact level for the Section 23 09

13 INSTRUMENTATION

AND CONTROL

DEVICES FOR HVAC?

The CIA impact level will be assigned by NAVFAC at a later date.

Volume 2

Cybersecurity 1.3.9.e.

What is the CIA impact level for the Section 23 09

23.02 BACNET DIRECT

DIGITAL CONTROL FOR

HVAC AND OTHER

BUILDING CONTROL

SYSTEMS?

The CIA impact level will be assigned by NAVFAC at a later date.

Volume 2

Cybersecurity 1.3.9.f.

What is the CIA impact level for the Section 26 27

14.00 20 ELECTRICITY

METERING?

The CIA impact level will be assigned by NAVFAC at a later date.

Volume 2

Cybersecurity 1.3.9.g.

What is the CIA impact level for the Section 26 51

00 INTERIOR LIGHTING?

The CIA impact level will be assigned by NAVFAC at a later date.

Volume 2

Cybersecurity 1.3.9.h.

What is the CIA impact level for the Section 26 56

00 EXTERIOR

LIGHTING?

The CIA impact level will be assigned by NAVFAC at a later date.

Volume 2

Cybersecurity 1.3.9.i.

What is the CIA impact level for the Section 28 10

05 ELECTRONIC

SECURITY SYSTEMS?

The CIA impact level will be assigned by NAVFAC at a later date.

Volume 2

Cybersecurity 1.3.9.j.

What is the CIA impact level for the Section 28 31

76 INTERIOR FIRE

ALARM AND MASS

NOTIFICATION

SYSTEM?

The CIA impact level will be assigned by NAVFAC at a later date.

Volume 2

Cybersecurity

Do any of the networked systems is RFI (i.e. life safety, access control, power metering) that reach back to other facilities on the base currently have an authority to operate under the RMF?

There is a DDC ALC control systems at the Philly Navy

Yard having an RMF, the contractor should coordinate with Joshua Stephens

(Joshua.stephens@navy.mil) in CIO4 for any possible interface requirements to this system.

82 25 50 00 Page 2 1.3.1

Who are the designated

System Owner (SO) and

Authorizing Official (AO) for this project?

These representatives will be assigned by NAVFAC at a later date.

83 25 50 00 Page 2 1.3.1

Cybersecurity Design, notes a 5 step process to facilitate implementation of Cyber

Security, the five step process, dictates that the

System Owner (SO) and

Authorizing Official (AO) determine the

Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability of impact levels. This appears to be an owner driven requirement, not a contractor requirement.

Please provide further detail regarding the contractor’s responsibilities.

Yes. This is the responsibility of NAVFAC to define.

84 25 50 00 Page 2 1.3.2

Authority to Operate – please provide information regarding quantity and duration of RMF meetings.

The quantity and duration of

RMF meetings cannot be defined at this time. The offerors should provide a bid based on one, one-hour meeting for each Facility-related Control System.

85 25 50 00 Page 2 1.3.6

Cybersecurity Specialist, please confirm the DoD assigns this individual to the project as an owner representative. Civilian contractors do not employ this skill set.

No. The Contractor is required to have a Cybersecurity

Specialist per the specifications.

mailto:Joshua.stephens@navy.mil mailto:Joshua.stephens@navy.mil mailto:Joshua.stephens@navy.mil mailto:Joshua.stephens@navy.mil mailto:Joshua.stephens@navy.mil mailto:Joshua.stephens@navy.mil mailto:Joshua.stephens@navy.mil mailto:Joshua.stephens@navy.mil mailto:Joshua.stephens@navy.mil

At the OA building, is the design intent to provide an exterior wall configuration with a specific level of sound transmission classification (STC) for a secure work environment?

The secure boundary on the

1st floor of the OA building seems to have some inconsistency in relation to the STC rating. Along the boundary the rated walls range from STC 49-58, the glass in the spec calls for a minimum of STC 26, and in the north east and south west corners by the stairwells there is no STC rating. What is the desired sound attenuation level to be achieved by the secure boundary?

Wall types indicated on the drawings are correct.

The vestibule entering the secure area is only STC rated on two sides. Should the entire vestibule carry the same STC rating on all walls?

No.

The doors and glass that are in the STC walls do not carry an STC rating. This will be a point of failure in regard to sound attenuation if installed as designed.

Please advise.

Specified doors and glass indicated on the drawings are correct.

Please confirm the foil backed drywall on the exterior walls is only being used as a vapor barrier and not for Tempest protections.

Correct.

90 09 72 00 1A408

The spec section for

Wallcoverings does not include any information for the Digital Wall Covering.

Please provide a spec or cut sheet that can be referenced.

Information is provided in the contract documents. In addition to 1A408 and 09 72

00 paragraph 2.2, see also

1I601.

91 07 27 10.00 10 1.8

Specification states that Air

Barrier Inspector should review the design and list deficiencies and propose corrective action. With the drawings complete thru

CD’s. Is this still required?

WT intention is to have inspector review submittals for any interface concerns.

Is this acceptable?

Yes, Air Barrier Inspector must review the design and list deficiencies and propose corrective action. Having inspector review submittals for any interface concerns is appropriate.

92 07 27 10.00 10 3.1.1

Spec requires daily reports for ENTIRE installation process. It reads that these reports are to be completed by AB Inspector.

Section 07 27 10.00 10 paragraph 3.1.1 requires the contractor to provide a daily inspector for the entire installation process. Section

01 91 00.15 22 paragraph

3.1.4.2.b. is referring to the

Government-provided third-party Comissioning Authority.

Spec section 01 91 00.15 22 paragraph 3.1.4.2.b. clearly states that Inspector will be on site at least twice for each building envelope to inspect installation prior to testing.

What is the desired intent for Air Barrier Inspections prior to testing?

93 Attachment H

1S101, 2S101

Attachment H indicates 3

CTP Compression Test

Piles and 7 Pile-Driving

Test Piles. Dwgs 1S101 and

2S101 and the spec indicate a total of 4 CTPs and 6 Pile-

Driving Test Piles. Please clarify.

Number of test piles indicated on the drawings are correct.

94 Attachment H CLIN 0005

Neither the project specs nor the Details A2 and B2 on

2A503 call out what type of metal siding is desired.

Please provide a spec or cut sheet that can be referenced.

Refer to spec section 07 42 13.

95 02 41 00

Will the Government be removing any material that is being stored in building

121? If not and the contractor is to do so, does any of it contain hazardous material?

Material in Building 121 (as shown in the photos on the drawings) must be removed by the contractor. Refer to hazardous material reports in the specifications.

96 02 41 00

Is mold present in either building 121 or 49? The photos do not clearly show, nor was it able to assess from the site visit. The documents do not state either. If so this is an EHS consideration for PPE, among other possible ramifications. Please advise.

Please see attachment regarding mold presence in building 121.

97 02 41 00

Are there any liquids or powders contained in the piping systems of buildings

121 or 49 that are hazardous or require special handling?

Unknown.

01 30 01.00 22 and 1.3

The Government estimates for the FF&E and A/V on

Refer to Amendment 0002

Continuation Sheet.

Attachment H

Attachment H are in conflict with the estimates stated in spec section 01 30 01.00

22. Please clarify.

99 09 72 00 2A407

A1/2A407 refers to the

“Fabric Liner System Seal to Structure All sides”.

There is no description of the desired system in the specifications. What system is required? Does this require stick pins adhered to the back side of the metal panels? Is there supplemental framing required?

Refer to spec section 07 21 16 paragraph 2.3.5.

100 Attachment H

CLIN

0001AR

Please confirm that of all of the work described in this

CLIN the Contractor shall only be responsible for furnish and installation of all new cables and splices to existing cables.

The contractor is responsible for the entire CLIN, including work done by DTE.

101 Attachment H Amendme nt 02

Should the Total Price for

CLINs 0001-00010 now read “Total CLINs 0001-

0009”?

See updated Attachment H -

Price Proposal Form included with Amendment 0006.

102 07 81 00 1.2.2 1G103

Spec refers to UL Design

Reference N 925 for Fire

Proofing of Floor Supports.

This UL Design Reference cannot be located. Both the line item for Floor Decks in the same paragraph and the

Building Code Summary on

1G103 refer to D925 for

Floor Decks. Should this also read D925?

Yes, the spec should read

D925 for floor supports.

103 1A111

Please clarify where exactly is the wood veneer applied on the bulkhead? Which rooms are applicable? (Ref-

A3-1A512)

Refer to 1A401 and referenced elevations for extent of wood veneer.

104 01 30 01.00 22 1.4.1

Section 1.4.1 of Spec

Section states that the

Interior Designer of Record is to be NCIDQ certified. Is this flexible for a professional, specifically a registered architect whose practice has been concentrated on Interior

Design? If NCIDQ certification is absolutely required, can Interior

Design professionals work under the NCIDQ certified professional?

Propose per the specifications.

105 33 41 00 Note 16 1C118

For the Amendment 0002 notes regarding the requirement for a PE to be onsite while installing the jellyfish filters, is this to be a PE provided by the

Contractor or Government?

If by Contractor is the intent that it be a PE from Contec

Engineered Solutions or does it matter?

The PE must be provided by the contractor. The PE is not required to be from Contec

Engineered Solutions.

1S002, 2S002

Pile capacities have been provided per each of the three structures. As it is a delegated design, please provide the actual column loads (dead and live loads) at the base plate of the footings for each of the three structures in order to prepare an appropriate proposal based on the capacities achievable per the subcontractor design.

Piles are not a delegated design item.

107 10 22 39 3.2.3

Spec 3.2.3 states (NIC) of

52 plus or minus – Operable

Partitions typically use STC for the acoustic Sound

Rating. For a NIC rating of

52 the panel would need to be approx. STC 60 plus, which is not available.

Please verify that the BOD should be the Modernfold

Encore STC 52?

Verified.