N4008519R9020 Amendment 0004.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

SOLICITATION NO. N40085-19-R-9020 CON- DBB P457 CRYOGENICS FACILITY MCAS BEAUFORT

SEE SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

Contract POC: Kristy Wright; kristy.l.w right1@navy.mil; 757-341-1644

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 6

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 15-Jul-2020

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N4008519R9020

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

15-Jun-2020

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

15-Jul-2020

CODE

NAVFAC MID ATLANTIC

ACQUISITION CORE

9324 VIRGINIA AVENUE

NORFOLK VA 23511-3095

N40085 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N4008519R9020

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 0004

The purpose of this amendment is to provide the following:

1. PPI responses

PPI

Reference

Question Response Page Section Paragraph

Drawing File

A-602 A-501

Sheet A-602 depicts a single hung window. A- 501 shows what looks to be center set fixed storefront details. The specifications list awnings (project out) as well as hung windows.

Please advise what product we are to provide for operable (hung or awning?) or fixed windows (storefront)?

Provide awning windows with bug screens.

Drawing File

A-502 A-503

The storefront details on A-502 and A-503 show an offset glazed curtain wall framing member. To achieve ATFP criteria, the system will be much deeper if curtain wall is desired (7 ½”). A (5 ½”) center glazed frame can be used to achieve ATFP and a less space consuming finished product. Please advise.

(5 ½”) Center glazed storefront is acceptable, but must be ‘thermally broken’.

6 Page 8 RFP

The RFP at page 8 asks for copies of the SAM Representations and Certifications as well as “proof of registration in SAM. Is the Copy of FARS/DFARS Report satisfactory for proof of SAM registration or, if not, what documentation is being sough for proof of SAM registration?

Propose according to RFP

7 Page 8 RFP

The RFP at page 8 asks for confirmation of filing of Offeror’s VETS-4212 for the 2017 filing cycle. Is this reference to 2017 correct or should Offeror’s submit their most current VETS filing (for the 2019 cycle)?

The VETS-4212 cycle is 2019. Please see Amendment 0003

8 Page 12 RFP

The RFP at page 12 asks for Total Recordable Case data. Is the OSHA 300a sufficient supporting documentation for TRC as well as DART rate, or is other documentation being sought?

Propose according to RFP

9 Page 16 RFP

The RFP at page 16 and Amendment 1 state that the proposal due date is 7/16 for electronic originals, but that hard copies and CD-ROMS have to be postmarked for express mail by 7/15 (Day prior to the Proposal Due Date). Given this, does the hard copy have to include the price proposal form filled out as well as the fully executed 1442?

Please send those documents via email prior to the proposal due date. The hard copy does not have to include the fully filled out price proposal form.

Drawing File

B-200 Are 3” diameter earthquake drains allowed in lieu of the specified 4” diameter? 3” meets the industry standard and is commonly utilized.

The earthquake drains should be 4 inch diameter as specified on the plans and specifications.

Drawing File

A-601 & A-602

Please confirm that door openings 102, 105, 106, 111, 113B, 114, and 115A are to have an STC rating of 53. If so, we will need to make adjustments to the hardware specified to achieve the STC value. Please confirm the STC rating and we can adjust hardware as required to comply with this STC value.

Doors 102, 103, 104, 113B, 115A need to meet the STC rating of 40. Doors will need gaskets and automatic door bottom.

Doors 106, 111, 105, 114 do not have to achieve an STC rating.

Drawing File

A-601 & A-602

Confirm that the following openings require an STC rating of 40: 101, 103, 104, 107A, 107B, 108, 109A, 109B, 110, 116. We assume we can make the required hardware adjustments to achieve this STC rating if required. Please advise.

Doors 102, 103, 104, 113B, 115A need to meet the STC rating of 40. Doors will need gaskets and automatic door bottom.

Doors 106, 111, 105, 114 do not have to achieve an STC rating

Drawing File

S-001

Are the exterior hollow metal doors and frames to be blast resistant? They appear to be so from sheet S-001, “Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection Notes”. However, I cannot find the blast standoff distance information which is also required. Please provide me with this information.

Doors are not rated for blast resistance.

Any glazing needs to meet the requirements of UFC 4-010-01 dated 12DEC2018, Paragraph 3-11.1

08 34

Drawing File

A-602

There are no notes on sheet A-602 regarding sound rating of any doors. Does section 083473 apply to this project? If so please designate doors where sound rating is required on sheet A-602.

Doors 102, 103, 104, 113B, 115A need to meet the STC rating of 40. Doors will need gaskets and automatic door bottom.

Doors 106, 111, 105, 114 do not have to achieve an STC rating

Drawing File

A-602

There are wood doors shown on the door schedule on A-602 but there is no spec section for wood doors. Please provide specifications for wood doors.

Disregard reference to wood doors use hollow metal doors.

Drawing File

A-602 The door material and elevation and frame elevation is missing from the door schedule for door 112. Please provide this information.

Door Material: HM; Door Frame: FR1

Drawing File

CS-100

Two “receiving bollards” are noted on CS100 (note 28). There is no detail provided for “receiving bollards”. Should these be included per detail C3 or C4/CS500? If not please provide a detail.

These bollards should be considered to be Fixed Bollards as shown in detail C3.

Drawing File

S-102

What is the required size and spacing of the vertical reinforcing at the CMU walls at the N2/O2 Tank Storage and MNGG Shelter shown on S-102?

Reinforcing for both walls is #6 vertical reinforcing at 32” o.c., max. The walls are fully grouted.

Drawing File

A-104 To verify – is roof insulation and gypsum cover board required at the Tank Storage and Storage Canopy structures?

Roof insulation and gypsum cover board is not required.

Drawing File

A-201 & A -303

The translucent panel height scales to 4’-4” on elevation D1/A-201 but section A1/A-303 notes the opening height as 3’-4”. Please verify the correct dimension for the translucent panel opening (height and length).

The translucent panel is 4’0”. Wall section A1/A-303 bottom of opening dimension is 16’-0”, not 16’-8”.

Drawing File

A-501

Please clarify the soffit construction. A3 & B3/A-501 appears to show hat channel on the underside of the outlookers while B1, C3 & C4/A-505 show 1-1/2” metal stud framing. A3 & B3/A-501 note 5/8” gypsum board, air barrier and metal soffit panel while B1, C3 & C4/A-505 only notes ½” exterior gypsum.

½” exterior gypsum is acceptable at soffit locations. The air barrier and air barrier transitions are required on all details. The framing can be done with studs/ C channels to meet the wind load requirements

841113 or 85113

Is window type A to be included as aluminum storefront per section 084113 or aluminum windows per section 085113?

The intention was to have the “type A” window match the aluminum storefront

Drawing File

A-601 & A-101

Wall Type 1 is labeled at 2 sides of Tool Room 114 but there appears to be furring on one side of the CMU while the details on A-601 shows furring on both sides. Please clarify what is required at these 2 walls at Tool Room 114.

At the tool room there is no furring on the interior of the tool room. The walls facing Room #113 and 115 have 5/8” gypsum board, hat channel, mineral wool insulation, and air/vapor barrier as shown on wall type 1.

Drawing File

A-601

Wall Types 4 and 4A on A-601 note “High Impact GWB” on both sides of the wall on the details but notes “Type X Gypsum Board, Both Sides” in the Remarks column. Which is correct?

Impact Resistant on all walls that are not fire rated. On fire rated walls use impact resistant type x gypsum board

Drawing File

I-102 & A-

Sheet I-102, Finish Schedule Note 3 states “all window sills to be SS-2”. Note 3 is labeled on the finish schedule at rooms 107 and 109.

These rooms do not have any windows. Also window sill detail B5/A-501 does not show a solid surface window sill. Please clarify if solid surface window sills are required and if so where.

Finish Schedule Note 3 should be at Rooms 101, 103, and 104 where there are windows. Delete Note 3 from Finish Schedule Rooms 107 and 109.

Drawing File

CD100

Demolition Keynote 6 states to “Remove Concrete Pad (Bid Option)”. Which Bid Option should this be included with?

This is an error. The words Bid Option should not be included with this note.

The removal of the concrete pad is part of the base bid.

Drawing File

A-601 & A-101

Please confirm that there are no Doors/Frames in a Type 3 wall. I only ask as it has both a fire rated and an STC rated wall. It would be important on both points if we have any door/frames in a Type 3 wall. I see a Type 3 wall on sheet A-601. I only see a Type 3 wall marker located at the separation wall between Room 111 and Room 106.

Wall type 3 does not have a door opening. The type 3 wall separates rooms 111 and 106 also room 112 from room 107,109,116

08 41 13 & 08 51 13

Please advise if the aluminum doors and frames are to be blast resistant and impact resistant.

Specification 084113 calls out Impact Protection, but spec 085113 calls out for Blast

The windows and doors do not have to be blast resistant. Specification sections 08 51 13 Aluminum windows and 08 41 13 storefronts are to be impact resistant.

Resistant. Please identify which pertains to which product.

07 22 00 & 07 61

Drawing File

A-505

Section 07 22 00 para.2.1.3 states provide R-value indicated on the drawings. Drawing A- 505 indicates R-30 Section 07 61 14 para. 2.5 states provide R-value of 36 or more. Please advise which is the correct R-value.

R-30 c.i. is required for the roofing R-value

01 30 01.00

Drawing File

I-101 Please provide a furniture specification for Bid Item 0005 for FF&E.

See specification section 01 03 01.00 22 for FF&E information

Drawing File

ES103

What is the location of Node B614? Does the 72 Strand originate there? Will there be an existing splice point there or will it originate in an existing rack?

The survey done for this design did not specifically include this area. An approximate area is shown on the drawings, but it will need to be field verifies. The 72 strands does originate there. Assume there is an existing rack.

Drawing File

ES102

Is an aerial splice required for new 300pr at pole #2163? Or will the cables be cut and backfed into HH-1 where they are to be spliced or should we leave a coil for others?

The cables will be cut and back fed into HH-1. Leave a coil for others to use.

Drawing File

ES102

Is an aerial splice required for 300pr/12SM at pole #2180? Or will the cables be cut and backfed into MH-1 where they are to be spliced or should we leave a coil for others?

The cables will be cut and back fed into HH-1. Leave a coil for others to use.

Drawing File

ES102

At existing Handhole (near pole # 2169), are we splicing a 300pr/24SM or 300pr/12SM?

24SM is not in the provided matrix

24 SM.

Drawing File

ES102

At existing Handhole, are we splicing into existing copper and fiber? If so, what are the copper/fiber counts of the existing?

You are splicing into existing copper and fiber. Currently there is 24 strands of fiber and 300 pair of copper.

08 41 13 para 3.4.1.a 3.4.5

The specs instruct to “Test air infiltration in accordance with ASTM E783” but provide no direction regarding number of units required to be tested. Also, the specs start by referencing ASTM E783 in para. 3.4.1 and then go on to reference to ASTM E283 in para. 3.4.1.a.

ASTM E783 is a field test an ASTM E283 is a laboratory test. Does the specifier want field testing, lab testing, both, and how many units?

Finally, the specs instruct to “Submit certified test reports showing that the system is designed to provide no uncontrolled water when tested in accordance with ASTM E1105.” Does the specifier intend the same “certified test reports” requirement for the air infiltration testing in 3.4.1, or is field testing and/or additional lab testing for air infiltration actually required?

Provide field tests and information. Lab test should have been performed by the manufacturer. Additional Lab testing is not required. This specification section deals with the storefront entrance.

Drawing File

ES102

Where does the 25pr originate coming out of MH1 and where does it end? Drawings are showing a new 25 pair being spliced to 300pr in MH-2 so where does the original 25 pair

25 pair copper will be run from MH-1 to the entrance of P457.

land?

Drawing File

ES102

Drawing ES102 shows (1) 300pr/12SM being installed from MH-3 to Both HH-1 and existing HH, however from MH-2 shows only (1) 300pr/12SM, are these cables being spliced in MH-3 or should we be installing (2)300pr/12SM to each HH from MH-2?

These cables are being spliced in MH-3.

Drawing File

ES103

Does the EUC (existing underground conduit) pathway have existing Maxcell/innerduct for the new 72 SM or should be carry?

Assume there is no existing maxcell/innerduct for EUC.

Drawing File

ES102

Drawings do not call out new Maxcell/innerduct for the new fiber pathway, is that covered by others?

Provide maxcell/innerduct for all fiber pathways.

RFP Pg

Please provide wage determination for roofer Propose according to RFP

01 30 01.00

1.3

Specification 01 30 01.00 22 DESIGN, PROCUREMENT AND INSTALLATION OF

FURNITURE, FIXTURES AND

EQUIPMENT states “the FF&E Planned Modification is $95,000 and does NOT include the Contractor's Handling and Administration Rate (HAR). This Government FF&E estimate must not be altered by Contractors during the bid process.” Please clarify the following:

a. Is the Contractor to insert $95,000 for CLIN 0005 at the time of bid?

b. Bids for FF&E should not be solicited at this time, but the $95,000 should be used an the contract will be modified after the fact once design is complete and bids have been collected?

c. Is the Contractor to include, in addition to the $95,000 in CLIN 0005, design fees and Contractor's Handling and Administration Rate (HAR) in CLIN 0001?

Please see the section “Planned Modification Bid Notes” within the Bid Schedule

(End of Summary of Changes)