N4008024R2401 - Solicitation.pdf

INDEFINITE-DELIVERY, INDEFINITE-QUANTITY (IDIQ) MULTIPLE AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT (MACC) SMALL BUSINESS (SB) SET ASIDE FOR ROOFING SERVICES FOR FACILITIES PRIMARILY IN THE NAVFAC WASHINGTON, AREA OF RESPONSIBILITY (AOR)

This procurement is being solicited as a Total Small Business set-aside.

Proposal Documents

ATTACHMENT A – PPI LOG TEMPLATE

ATTACHMENT B – CONSTRUCTION AND DESIGN EXPERIENCE PROJECT DATA SHEET

ATTACHMENT C – PRICE PROPOSAL FORM (DEMONSTRATION PROJECT)

ATTACHMENT D – PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ) FORM

SF 1442 Attachments and Exhibits:

ATTACHMENT E – USU Roof Garden Design Submission - Final Specifications (SPECS DEMONSTRATION PROJECT) ATTACHMENT F – USU Roof Garden Design Submission - Final Draw ings (DWGS DEMONSTRATION PROJECT)

DANIEL RUSSELL 202-685-8086

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS

NEGOTIATED

30-Sep-2024

(RFP)

(IFB)

X

CALL:

B. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)

See Item 7

2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID

3. DATE ISSUED

9. FOR INFORMATION A. NAME

SOLICITATION

X

NSN 7540-01-155-3212 1442-101 STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 4-85)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.236-1(e)

11. The Contractor shall begin performance w ithin _______15 calendar days and complete it w ithin ________ calendar days after receiving aw ard, notice to proceed. This performance period is X mandatory, negotiable. (See _________________________52.211-10

12 A. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?

(If "YES," indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12B.)

X YES NO

13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:

A. Sealed offers in original and __________1 copies to perform the w ork required are due at the place specified in Item 8 by ___________ local time ______________30 Oct 2024 (date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers must be publicly opened at that time.

shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time offers are due.

B. An offer guarantee X is, is not required.

C. All offers are subject to the (1) w ork requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.

D. Offers providing less than _______120 calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due w ill not be considered and w ill be rejected.

SOLICITATION, OFFER,

AND AWARD

(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

1. SOLICITATION NO.

IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.

4. CONTRACT NO.

7. ISSUED BY CODE

NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING SYS COMMAND

1314 HARWOOD STREET SE

WASHINGTON DC 20374

N40080

PAGE OF PAGES

1 OF

CODE

(Title, identifying no., date):

12B. CALENDAR DAYS

02:00 PM (hour)

Sealed envelopes containing offers

5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NO. 6. PROJECT NO.

8. ADDRESS OFFER TO (If Other Than Item 7)

FAX:TEL: (202) 685-3192 TEL: FAX:

N4008024R2401 69

20B. SIGNATURE

(REV. 4-85)STANDARD FORM 1442 BACK

TO SIGN

NSN 7540-01-155-3212

SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD (Continued) (Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

CODE FACILITY CODE

17. The offeror agrees to perform the w ork required at the prices specif ied below in strict accordance w ith the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in w riting w ithin ________ calendar days after the date offers are due.

the minimum requirements stated in Item 13D. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13D.)

AMOUNTS SEE SCHEDULE OF PRICES

18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.

19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation -- give number and date of each)

AMENDMENT NO.

DATE

20A. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN

OFFER (Type or print)

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:

22. AMOUNT 23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN ITEM

(4 copies unless otherwise specified)

CODE

(Insert any number equal to or greater than

20C. OFFER DATE

25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO

10 U.S.C. 2304(c) 41 U.S.C. 253(c)

CODE27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY:26. ADMINISTERED BY

(Include ZIP Code)14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR 15. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code)

See Item 14

(Include only if different than Item 14)16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS

30B. SIGNATURE

29. AWARD (Contractor is not required to sign this document.)

document and return _______ copies to issuing office.) Contractor agrees Your of f er on this solicitation, is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award con-to f urnish and deliv er all items or perf orm all work, requisitions identif ied summates the contract, which consists of (a) the Gov ernment solicitation and on this f orm and any continuation sheets f or the consideration stated in this y our of f er, and (b) this contract award. No f urther contractual document is contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be necessary .

gov erned by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certif ications, and specif ications or incorporated by ref er-ence in or attached to this contract.

30A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED 31A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

30C. DATE

(Type or print)

TEL: EMAIL:

31B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 31C. AWARD DATE

BY

CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE

(Contractor is required to sign this28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT

(M ust be fully completed by offeror)OFFER

N4008024R2401

Section 00 10 00 - Solicitation

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

0001 249,000,000 Project SB Roofing MACC Base

FFP

INDEFINITE-DELIVERY, INDEFINITE-QUANTITY (IDIQ) MULTIPLE

AWARD CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT ROOFING (MACC) SMALL

BUSINESS

(SB) SET ASIDE FOR FACILITIES PRIMARILY IN THE NAVFAC

WASHINGTON, AREA OF RESPONSIBILITY (AOR)

FOB: Destination

NET AMT

OPTION SB Roofing Option Period 1

FFP

Roofing MACC Option Period 1: Three calendar years duration

OPTION SB Roofing Option Period 2

FFP

Roofing MACC: Option Period 2: Three calendar years duration

DELIVERY INFORMATION

CLIN DELIVERY DATE QUANTITY SHIP TO ADDRESS DODAAC /

CAGE

0001 N/A N/A N/A N/A

0002 N/A N/A N/A N/A

0003 N/A N/A N/A N/A

Section 00 21 16 - Instructions to Proposers

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. GENERAL

1.1 NOTICE TO OFFERORS

1.2 GENERAL OVERVIEW OF PROCUREMENT PROCESS

1.3 GENERAL OVERVIEW OF CONTRACT

2 GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE DEMONSTRATION PROJECT

3 BASIS FOR AWARD

4 EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

5. PROPOSAL REQUIREMENTS

5.1 SITE VISIT

5.2 PROPOSAL SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS

5.3 PRE-PROPOSAL INQUIRIES (PPIs)

5.4 CONTRACT OPPORTUNITIES (SAM.GOV)

5.5 INCORPORATION OF TECHNICAL PROPOSALS

1. GENERAL

1.1 NOTICE TO OFFERORS

1.1.1 THIS SOLICITATION IS BEING ISSUED AS A TOTAL SMALL BUSINESS SETASIDE.

THE NAICS CODE FOR THIS PROCUREMENT IS 238160 AND THE SIZE STANDARD IS $19M.

1.2 GENERAL OVERVIEW OF PROCUREMENT PROCESS

1.2.1 This solicitation is formatted as a Request for Proposal (RFP) in accordance with the requirements designated by sections of the FAR 15.203. This method permits evaluation of proposals based on price competition, technical merit and other factors; permits impartial and comprehensive evaluation of offerors' proposals; permits discussions if necessary; and ensures selection of the source(s) whose performance provides the best value to the Government.

This acquisition will be solicited as a competitively negotiated procurement as a total small business set-aside.

1.2.2 OFFERORS ARE ADVISED THAT AWARD MAY BE MADE WITHOUT DISCUSSION OR ANY

CONTACT CONCERNING THE PROPOSALS RECEIVED. Therefore, proposals should be submitted initially on the most favorable price and technical terms. Offerors should not assume that they will be contacted or afforded an opportunity to qualify, discuss, or revise their proposals. However, the Government reserves the right to clarify certain aspects of proposals or conduct discussions providing an opportunity for the offeror to revise its proposal.

1.3 GENERAL OVERVIEW OF CONTRACT

1.3.1 This acquisition will result in the award of a Design-Build (DB)/Design- Bid-Build (DBB), Indefinite- Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ), Multiple Award Construction Contract (MACC) for various roofing projects within the NAVFAC Washington Area of Responsibility (AOR). The Government intends to award approximately five (5) contracts resulting from this solicitation to the responsible Offerors whose proposals represent the best values after evaluation in accordance with the factors and their relative importance, unless more or less than five (5) is determined to be the best value to the government by the Source Selection Authority.

1.3.2 Construction projects to be performed under this MACC will require the ability to manage multiple task orders concurrently across the NAVFAC Washington AOR. This MACC will encompass a variety of projects that include, but are not limited to the New Construction, Demolition, Repair, Alteration, and/or renovation of roofing or roofing materials (and may include minor general construction scope such as architectural, structural, mechanical or electrical items). Task Orders may include, but not limited to, removal and reinstallation of existing roof mounted equipment and enclosures, “cut-out” demolition and installation of framing and curbing for new, and/or replaced equipment, “patching-in” around new equipment, secure and disconnect electrical, gas, refrigeration, steam and condensate and other process services in conjunction with “remove and reinstall” or “install new” equipment during accomplishment roofing work, roofing demolition and debris handling and disposal, installation of new roofing, scheduled repair of existing roofs, emergency roof repair, repair or replacement of roof drains, connector piping, drain pans, gutters and leaders, parapet wall treatments, flashing, cap treatments, repair or replacement of roof decking materials, repair, replacement or installation of permanent fall protection, access ladders, access and smoke hatches, roof expansion joints, and roof work which potentially involves asbestos containing material and/or lead containing material handling, abatement and disposal, as well as interior dust and debris containment and protection in accordance with applicable federal, state, and local safety and health regulations. Types of facilities may include, but not limited to, administrative, industrial, maintenance, warehouses, communications, personnel support, recreation, lodging, medical, training, ranges, airfields, hangars, etc.

1.3.3 The completion date for the IDIQ contracts is eight (8) years from the date of contract award with a two-year base period, and two (2) three-year option periods, not to exceed 96 months. The total 8-year (base and 2 options) estimated construction cost for all contracts is not to exceed $249,000,000 for the life of the contract. Projects for the MACC have an estimated construction cost between $150,000 and $15,000,000; however, smaller and larger dollar value projects may be considered at the discretion of the Contracting Officer.

1.3.4 The Government guarantees an award amount of $5,000 to successful offeror for the life of the contract.

1.3.5 After award of the initial contracts and “demonstration” project, the successful IDIQ contractors will compete for task orders based on best value, using the tradeoff process or lowest price technically acceptable (to include lowest price). Only the successful IDIQ contractors will compete for future task orders.

2 GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE DEMONSTRATION PROJECT

2.1 Due to funding constraints, this acquisition will be solicited with one demonstration project. Pricing of the demonstration project will be used to evaluate the reasonableness of proposed pricing in order to make best value determinations Design-Build (DB) E-USU-76 Roof Garden, NSA Bethesda, MD. The project consists of removing existing roof, add a topping slope, add access from the interior and put a green roof on top. It is also to provide a design for a roof garden / patio design at the second floor of bldg. 76E. Design includes architectural layout following option A of study including but not limiting to green area, architectural gravel, seats, Arbor, tables , chairs, architectural lighting approved by USUHS. Also included is Structural strengthening, Landscape Architecture, Mechanical, Electrical and Plumbing to accommodate installation of the roof garden and support function of the new layout and incidental related work. All work shall be completed not later than 180 calendar days after the date of award. This project was selected as the demonstration project from existing requirements to best represent the nature of potential work under the contract. The Government reserves the right to award the demonstration project at the time of the basic contract award or before the proposal expiration period, should funds become available. If the demonstration project is not awarded with the basic award, the guaranteed minimum will be awarded.

*Solicitation Section 01 00 00 will include the General Requirements for the demonstration project.

Pursuant to FAR 52.232-18, Availability of Funds, the Government's obligation under this solicitation, or any task order or contract that might result from the solicitation is entirely subject to, and contingent upon, the availability of appropriated funds. Should the Government be unable to award the demonstration project, the Government guarantees an award in the amount of $5,000.00 to each successful offeror upon award of the Multiple Award Construction Contracts. This minimum guarantee is over the full term of the contract, including option years. No legal liability on the part of the Government shall arise until funds are made available to the Contracting Officer and a task order or contract is awarded by the Contracting Officer.

Any offeror proposing on this solicitation does so at its own cost and with the full knowledge that a task order for the demonstration project, might not result from this solicitation.

3. BASIS FOR AWARD

3.1 The Government reserves the right to eliminate from consideration for award any or all offers at any time prior to award of the contract(s); to negotiate with offerors in the competitive range; and to award the contract(s) to the offeror(s) submitting the proposal(s) determined to represent the best value—the proposal(s) most advantageous to the Government, cost/price and other factors considered.

3.2 The Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors (except clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)). The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary. In addition, if the Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals.

3.3 The tradeoff process is selected as appropriate for this acquisition. The Government considers it to be in its best interest to allow consideration of award to other than the lowest priced offeror or other than the highest technically rated offeror.

3.4 As stated in the solicitation, all technical factors when combined are of equal importance to the performance confidence assessment (past performance) rating; and all technical factors and the performance confidence assessment (past performance) rating, when combined are approximately equal to price.

3.5 Any proposal found to have a deficiency in meeting the stated solicitation requirements or performance objectives will be considered ineligible for award, unless the deficiency is corrected through discussions. An Unacceptable rating in any of the non-cost/price factors and/or sub-factors will result in an overall rating of “Unacceptable” for the non-cost/price factors, unless corrected through discussions. Proposals may be found to have either a significant weakness or multiple weaknesses that impact either the individual factor rating or the overall rating for the proposal. The evaluation report must document the evaluation board’s assessment of the identified weakness(s) and the associated risk to successful contract performance resulting from the weakness(s). This assessment must provide the rationale for proceeding to award without discussions.

C. EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

1. The solicitation requires the evaluation of price and the following non-cost/price factors.

PHASE I:

Factor 1 – Technical Approach Factor 2 – Corporate Experience Factor 3 – Management Approach

PHASE II:

Factor 4 – Safety Factor 5 – Past Performance Price

Offerors shall submit a Phase I proposal in response to the solicitation. Offeror proposals will be evaluated against the stated RFP Criteria. Those Offerors identified to be in the Competitive Range will be invited to submit a Phase II proposal. Those Phase I Offerors who receive an Unacceptable in any factor will be considered ineligible for award, unless the significant weaknesses and/or deficiencies are easily correctable through discussions and the Contracting Officer determines discussions to be in the best interest of the Government; or unless otherwise determined to be included within the competitive range. Award will be made to the responsible Offeror(s) whose proposal(s) represent the best value to the Government, with Price and all Non-Price factors considered. Information for Phase II proposals will not be considered during Phase I. Likewise, Phase I proposals information shall not be considered with Phase II proposals.

2. The relative order of importance of the non-cost/price evaluation factors the technical factors (Factors 2, 3 and 4) are of equal importance to each other and, when combined, are equal in importance to the past performance evaluation/performance confidence assessment factor (Factor 5). Technical Approach (Factor 1) will be rated as either Acceptable or Unacceptable. If an Offeror is rated Unacceptable for Factor 1, such offeror will be considered ineligible for award, regardless of its rating under any of the other factors. When the proposal is evaluated as a whole, the technical factors and past performance/performance confidence assessment factor combined (i.e., the non-cost/price evaluation factors) are approximately equal to price.

The importance of price will increase if the Offerors’ non-cost/price proposals are considered essentially equal in terms of overall quality, or if price is so high as to significantly diminish the value of a non-cost/price proposal’s superiority to the Government. Award will be made to the responsible Offeror(s) whose offer conforms to the solicitation and represents the best value to the Government, price and non-price factors considered.

3. Basis of Evaluation and Submittal Requirements for Each Factor.

(a) Price:

(1) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

Price shall be submitted on the Price Proposal Form included in the solicitation. The offeror shall submit one (1) electronic copy via PIEE. Also, price information included in the non-price/technical proposal will not be considered. Likewise, non-price/technical information included in the price proposal will not be considered.

All submissions shall include the following documents. Failure to submit items (i) through (vi) shall result in your proposal being considered non-responsive and thus ineligible for award.

(i) Executed SF1442. Offeror shall insert its company name and address in Block #14, telephone number in Block #15, acknowledge all amendments in Block #19 (if applicable), name and title of person authorized to sign in Block #20A, signature in Block #20B, and offer date in Block #20C of the SF1442. In addition, Offeror shall provide its UEI Number, CAGE code, and Federal Tax ID number with its proposal. Note: UEI must be provided for each JV or mentor-protégé partner.

(ii) Completed Price Proposal Form for the demonstration Project.

(iii) Bid Bond (SF-24). Offeror shall submit a bid bond (SF-24) in the amount of 20% of total project bid price for the demonstration project or $3M, whichever amount is less. The bid bond shall be in the name of the offeror identified on the SF1442.

(iv) In addition, the offeror shall provide a letter from its bonding company confirming that it has a single award bonding capacity of at least $15,000,000 and an aggregate bonding capacity to award multiple projects in the minimum amount of at least $50,000,000.

(v) SAM registration. Offeror shall ensure current registration on the SAM Website, www.sam.gov, including Annual Representations and Certifications are complete and updated for this procurement. If a Representation or Certification required by Section 00 45 00 of the RFP is not provided in SAM, include the representation or certification in your price proposal.

(vi) VETS-4212 registration. Offeror shall ensure a current VETS-4212 report has been submitted to the Department of Labor (DOL) website, http://www.dol.gov/vets/vets4212.htm, if the Offeror is required to submit.

An email confirmation of submission can be requested and received by the Offeror from the DOL website and submitted in the price proposal. If the Offeror is not required to submit a report to VETS-4212, include a brief statement and justification explaining why the Offeror is not required to submit a report. Visit the VETS-4212 website for details concerning if your company is required to submit a VETS-4212 report and to request an email confirmation of submission.

*NOTE: A small business joint venture offeror must submit, with its offer, the representation required in paragraph

(c) of FAR solicitation provision 52.212-3, offeror Representations and Certifications-Commercial Products and Commercial Services, and paragraph (c) of FAR solicitation provision 52.219-1, Small Business Program Representations, in accordance with 52.204-8(d) and 52.212-3(b) for the following categories:

(A) Small business;

(B) Service-disabled veteran-owned small business;

(C) Women-owned small business (WOSB) under the WOSB Program;

(D) Economically disadvantaged women-owned small business under the WOSB Program; or

(E) Historically underutilized business zone small business.

The offeror is required to submit a complete Price Proposal Form that includes completion of all contract line items numbers (CLINs). Pricing information is not required to be completed under Section 00 10 00 – Solicitation Contract Form in SF 1442. All required proposal documents shall be submitted in accordance with FAR 15.208.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO BE SUBMITTED WITH PRICE PROPOSAL PACKAGE:

RESPONSIBILITY DETERMINATION INFORMATION - In order to be eligible for award, the offeror must be determined responsible in accordance with FAR Part 9, specifically 9.104-1, General Standards. In a separate Tab, the offeror shall provide the following information in the price proposal package:

1. One (1) Signed Bank Reference demonstrating adequate financial resources. If offeror’s firm has a line of credit – provide information on how many figures offeror can borrow against the line of credit (i.e. medium 6 figures – exact line of credit is not required).

2. The offeror shall provide the latest three complete fiscal year financial statements for the prime contractor, certified by an independent accounting firm, if practicable, or signed by an authorized officer of the organization.

Submit evidence of availability of working/operating capital, which will be used for the performance of the resultant contract. For Joint Venture arrangements, submit the latest three complete fiscal year financial statements for each company in the Joint Venture and discuss the financial responsibilities among the companies. The Government may also utilize Dun & Bradstreet reports to evaluate the financial capacity of the offeror. Offerors are not required to submit financial information as detailed in the price submission instructions via PIEE. Offerors may send proprietary financial statements to daniel.russell.civ@us.navy.mil with a clearly marked subject line: “N40080-24-

R-2401 [OFFEROR NAME] FINANCIAL STATEMENTS”

3. Description of offeror’s facilities and equipment.

4. Other offeror’s work presently under contract.

Although required to be submitted with offeror’s price proposal, this information will not be evaluated as part of the price proposal. This information forms the basis of your firm’s responsibility determination should your firm be considered for award. Proposal packages from unsuccessful offerors will not be returned to the offeror but shall be destroyed by the Contracting Officer. No certificate of destruction will be issued.

(2) Basis of Evaluation: The Government will evaluate price based on the total price for the seed project. Total price consists of the basic requirements and all option items. The Government intends to evaluate all options and has included the provision FAR 52.217-5, Evaluation of Options (JUL 1990) in the solicitation. In accordance with FAR 52.217-5, evaluation of options will not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s). Analysis will be performed by one or more of the following techniques to ensure a fair and reasonable price:

(i) Comparison of proposed prices received in response to the RFP.

(ii) Comparison of proposed prices with the IGCE.

(iii) Comparison of proposed prices with available historical information.

(iv) Comparison of market survey results.

(b) Non-cost/price Factors:

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements: The offeror shall submit one (1) electronic copy marked “Original” via PIEE. Price information included in the non-price/technical proposal will not be considered. Likewise, non-price/technical information included in the price proposal will not be considered. All submissions shall include the following:

• Include a cover page with Solicitation Number, Solicitation Title, Prime Contractor Name, Address, Phone Number, Unique Entity ID Number, Cage Code, Tax ID Number, Point of Contact, Title, phone number, and email address. 8 ½ x 11 paper, Times New Roman, 10-point font. Note: If proposing as a Joint-Venture (JV), please submit the POC, UEI, and CAGE Code for each JV partner.

Refer to individual factors for page limitations. Pages that exceed indicated page limitations shall not be evaluated.

(1) Factor 1 – Technical Approach

(i) Solicitation Submittal Requirements:

The composition and management of the firms proposed as the design-build (DB) team for this contract will be evaluated in this factor.

FAR Part 9.6 defines Contractor team arrangements. Contractor team arrangement means an arrangement in which -- (1) Two or more companies form a partnership or joint venture to act as a potential prime Contractor; or (2) A potential prime Contractor agrees with one or more other companies to have them act as its subcontractors under a specified Government contract or acquisition program.

The Offeror shall submit the following information:

(1) Provide a simple organizational chart that clearly identifies the lines of authority between the proposed primary construction firm(s) and primary design firm(s) for this contract. Include a brief description of the role and responsibility of each entity not to exceed (1) page.

Note: If the experience of an entity will be claimed in Factor 2, that entity must be named in Factor 1.

(2) In addition, the Offeror shall submit a signed copy of a joint venture agreement, partnership agreement, teaming agreement, approved mentor protégé agreement (MPA), or letter of commitment signed by each member of the Contractor team identified above (e.g., joint venture member, partner, team member, subcontractor, parent company, subsidiary, or other affiliated company, etc). Letters of commitment for the Designer of Record shall be addressed from the Designer of Record to the Offeror. The Designer of Record’s letter of commitment shall be signed by the Designer of Record’s signing authority.

(ii) Basis of Evaluation:

The assessment of the Offeror’s technical approach will be used as a means to review the organizational structure and roles and responsibilities proposed by the Offeror.

This factor will be rated on an Acceptable or Unacceptable basis.

(2) Factor 2 – Corporate Experience

a) Construction Experience:

Submit a maximum of five (5) relevant construction projects for the Offeror that best demonstrates your experience on relevant projects that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to the RFP. For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as:

Size: 1) A final construction cost of at least $2,000,000. At least one relevant project, however, shall have a final construction cost of at least $15,000,000 and

2) A total roofing area of 10,000 SF. At least one relevant project shall be at least 50,000 SF.

Scope: Submitted projects must demonstrate experience with at least one of the following:

- New Installation of Roofing System;

- Repair of Roofing System or Major Roofing Elements; or

- Replacement of Roofing System;

Complexity: Submitted projects must collectively demonstrate experience with each of the following:

- Low-slope roof coverings;

- Steep-slope roof coverings;

Note: Major Roofing Systems may include but are not limited to low-slope roof coverings such as Built-up Roofs (BUR), Mesh Reinforced Elastomeric Coatings, Modified Bitumen, and Single-Ply; and steep-slope roof coverings such as metal panels (standing seam), shingles, slate, tiles.

Submitted projects shall collectively demonstrate relevant experience with the following:

• At least one project demonstrating experience with each of the following elements of size, scope/complexity:

o New Installation of Roofing System; or;

o Repair of Roofing System or Major Roofing Elements;

o Replacement of Roofing System;

o Low-slope roof coverings;

o Steel slope roof coverings;

If a single project encompasses experience of more than one scope listed above, Offerors shall clearly delineate the portion of the job pertaining to each scope on the project data sheet. Note: Vague narrative details are likely insufficient.

• At least one design-build project

• At least one design-bid-build project

• At least one project with a final construction cost of at least $15,000,000 or greater

• At least one project with a total roofing area of at least 50,000 SF

Recency: Projects submitted for the Offeror shall be completed within the past seven (7) years of the date of issuance of this RFP.

For the purposes of this solicitation, the definition of a “complete” project is ‘The stage of construction of a building or facility, at which its owner can occupy for the purpose it was constructed,’ or the owner has accepted the constructed building or facility.

A project is defined as roofing systems or major roofing elements for a construction project performed under a single task order or contract.

In the context of this solicitation “Construction” is: The erection, installation or assembly of a new real property facility requiring multiple-disciplines (e.g. structural, roofing, mechanical and civil) which includes architectural and or engineering efforts necessary to construct a facility and/or the addition, expansion, extension, alteration, conversion or replacement of a real property facility requiring multiple disciplines which includes architectural and or engineering efforts necessary to construct a facility.

For multiple award and indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project; instead Offerors shall submit the work completed under a task order as a project.

The attached Construction & Design Experience Project Data Sheet (Attachment A) is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information. If the same project is being used to demonstrate construction and design experience, submit separate Project Data Sheets for construction and design. Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed three (3) pages.

For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP (i.e., unique features, area, construction methods). In addition, the description shall also address any sustainable features for the project, including specific descriptions of those features. Provide applicable documentation on projects that were validated and/or certified through a Sustainable Third-Party Certification program (This documentation does not count toward attachment A 3-page limit)

If the Offeror is a Joint Venture (JV), relevant project experience should be submitted for projects completed by the Joint Venture entity. If the Joint Venture does not have shared experience, projects may be submitted for the Joint Venture members. If a project was performed by a JV, and not all partners from that JV are on the JV proposed for this contract, the offeror shall clearly demonstrate what portion of the work was performed by the JV member offering on this contract and shall not include work performed by the JV as a whole. The JV member proposed for this contract shall specifically address field work performed by that JV member including field staffing and direct field work oversight. The JV member proposed for this contract shall also address home office management performed by that JV member including the number/percentage of employees provided for the overall contract by the JV members as well as the overall percentage of work performed by the JV member. The Offeror shall also submit a SIGNED copy of the Joint Venture agreement indicating the proposed participation of each Joint Venture member. Offerors are still limited to a total of five (5) projects combined. Offerors who fail to submit experience for all JV member partners may be considered less favorably.

If an Offeror is utilizing experience information of affiliates/subsidiaries/parent/LLC/LTD member companies (name is not exactly as stated on the SF1442), the proposal shall clearly demonstrate that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent firm will have meaningful involvement in the performance of the contract. The proposal shall state specific commitments of technical resources (e.g. personnel, equipment) that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member companies commit to the performance of this contract. In particular, the proposal will clearly state the specific commitments of resources of the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member companies in terms of the work it will either self-perform or manage on behalf of the Offeror in the performance of the contract. Vague commitments to support are likely insufficient; rather, they must demonstrate intent/manner of actual performance on the contract action being solicited.

Note: The Government will not consider any project submitted for Factor 2 if it was performed by a firm other than the Offeror and there is no supporting partnership agreement, teaming agreement, or letter of commitment demonstrating the necessary level of meaningful involvement described in Factor 1.

The Offeror may not utilize experience of a subcontractor to demonstrate construction experience other than as prescribed in 13 CFR 125.11. The Prime Offeror may submit experience where the prime offeror served as part of a joint venture or served as a first-tier subcontractor under Factor 2, Construction Experience.

(1) Design Experience:

Both design-build and design-bid-build projects may be contemplated under this MACC. Therefore, the Offeror is required to identify the design firm (Architect/Engineering firm) to be utilized as Designer of Record (DOR) on anticipated future projects. Provide the full name of the firm, address, UEI number, and CAGE code. The designated firm will be required to be utilized as the DOR on future design-build task orders under the resulting MACC, unless a substitution is approved by the Contracting Officer for the proposed task order. The Offeror must provide supporting documentation (such as a signed joint venture agreement, partnership agreement, teaming agreement, or letter of commitment on the proposed DOR’s letterhead) demonstrating agreement by the proposed design firm to perform as DOR for the duration of this MACC under Factor 1.

Submit a maximum of five (5) relevant design projects for the design team that best demonstrates design experience on relevant projects that are similar in size, scope, and complexity to the RFP performed by the DOR. The Government will only review five (5) projects for design. Any projects submitted in excess of five (5) for Design Experience will not be considered.

For purposes of this evaluation, a relevant project is further defined as:

Size: 1) A final construction cost of at least $2,000,000. At least one relevant project, however, shall have a final construction cost of at least $15,000,000 and

2) A total roofing area of 10,000 SF. At least one relevant project shall be at least 50,000 SF.

Scope: Submitted projects must demonstrate experience with at least one of the following:

- New Installation of Roofing System;

- Repair of Roofing System or Major Roofing Elements; or

- Replacement of Roofing System;

Complexity: Submitted projects must collectively demonstrate experience with each of the following:

- Low-slope roof coverings;

- Steep-slope roof coverings;

Note: Major Roofing Systems may include but are not limited to low-slope roof coverings such as Built-up Roofs (BUR), Mesh Reinforced Elastomeric Coatings, Modified Bitumen, and Single-Ply; and steep-slope roof coverings such as metal panels (standing seam), shingles, slate, tiles.

Submitted projects shall collectively demonstrate relevant experience with the following:

• Experience with each of the following elements of scope/complexity:

• At least one project demonstrating experience with each of the following elements of size, scope/complexity:

o New Installation of Roofing System; or;

o Repair of Roofing System or Major Roofing Elements;

o Replacement of Roofing System;

o Low-slope roof coverings;

o Steel slope roof coverings;

If a single project encompasses experience of more than one scope listed above, Offerors shall clearly delineate the portion of the job pertaining to each scope on the project data sheet. Note: Vague narrative details are likely insufficient.

• At least one design-build project

• At least one project with a final construction cost of at least $15,000,000 or greater

• At least one project with a total roofing area of at least 50,000 SF

Recency: A project submitted under design experience will meet the recency requirement if (a) the construction effort was completed within seven (7) years immediately preceding the RFP issuance date, regardless of the design completion date, OR (b) the construction effort is ongoing, but the design completion date was reached within the seven (7) years immediately preceding the RFP issuance date. Each relevant completion date shall be clearly stated on the Construction & Design Experience Project Data Sheet.

A project is defined as a complete design effort performed under a single task order or contract/subcontract. For multiple award and indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity type contracts, the contract as a whole shall not be submitted as a project; rather Offerors shall submit the work performed under a task order as a project.

The attached Construction & Design Experience Project Data Sheet (Attachment A) is MANDATORY and SHALL be used to submit project information. If the same project is being used to demonstrate construction and design experience, submit separate Project Data Sheets for construction and design. Except as specifically requested, the Government will not consider information submitted in addition to this form. Individual blocks on this form may be expanded; however, total length for each project data sheet shall not exceed three (3) single-sided pages. The design completion date shall CLEARLY be stated for submitted design projects. Failure to include the design completion date may result in a project being considered NOT RELEVANT for that project.

For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP (i.e., unique features, area, construction methods). In addition, the description should also address any sustainable features for the project, including specific descriptions of those features. Provide applicable documentation on projects that were validated and/or certified through a Sustainable Third Party Certification program. (This does not count towards the attachment A 3-page limit)

For all submitted projects, the description of the project shall clearly describe the scope of work performed and the relevancy to the project requirements of this RFP (i.e., unique features, area, construction methods). In addition, the description should also address any sustainable features for the project, including specific descriptions of those features. Provide applicable documentation on projects that were validated and/or certified through a Sustainable Third Party Certification program.

The proposal shall state specific commitments of technical resources (e.g. personnel, equipment) that the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member companies commit to the performance of this contract. In particular, the proposal will clearly state the specific commitments of resources of the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD member that will be located at the worksites and company offices in the city/area of the project. The proposal shall also describe specific roles of the affiliate/subsidiary/ parent/LLC/LTD member companies in terms of the work it will either self-perform or manage on behalf of the Offeror in performance of the contract. Failure to submit this information may result in a lower rating.

The Offeror must provide a supporting joint venture agreement, partnership agreement, teaming agreement, or letter of commitment and an explanation of the involvement for the design subcontractor. Offerors proposing multiple design firms should submit relevant project experience for all design firms. Failure to do so may result in a lower rating. Offerors are still limited to a total of five (5) design submission projects combined.

The basis of evaluation will include the Offeror’s demonstrated experience and depth of experience in performing relevant construction and design projects as defined in the solicitation submittal requirements. The assessment of the Offeror’s relevant experience will be used as a means of evaluating the capability of the Offeror to successfully meet the requirements of the RFP. The Government will only review five (5) projects for construction and five (5) for design. Any projects submitted in excess of the five (5) for Construction Experience and five (5) for Design Experience will not be considered. The Government may consider the following:

• Relevant proposals demonstrating projects where the Offeror and the proposed design firm(s) have previously worked together may be considered more favorably than those that have not worked together.

• Relevant projects completed by the Offeror as a prime contractor may be considered more favorably than those they completed as a first-tier subcontractor or those completed by their affiliates/subsidiaries/ parent/LLC/LTD.

• Proposals demonstrating more relevant project experience with sustainable features may be considered more favorably than those that do not demonstrate experience with sustainable features.

• Proposals demonstrating relevant experience with a 20-year warranty to include but not limited to work performed under warranty may be considered more favorably.

Note: Offerors who fail to submit experience for each JV member in the absence of shared JV experience may be considered less favorably.

Note: If the Offeror is proposing as a single corporate entity (i.e. not as a Joint Venture), the Offeror may submit relevant project experience it performed as a partner in a previous Joint Venture. The offeror shall clearly demonstrate what portion of the work that they performed on this contract and shall not include work performed by the JV as a whole. The Offeror shall specifically address field work that they performed including field staffing and direct field work oversight and address home office management performed including the number/percentage of employees provided for the overall contract and the overall percentage of work performed.

Note 2: Vague commitments to support are likely insufficient; rather, they must demonstrate intent/manner of actual performance on the contract action being solicited. If meaningful involvement is not demonstrated, experience of the affiliate/subsidiary/parent/LLC/LTD firm will not be considered.

(3) Factor 3 – Management Approach

Offeror shall submit a narrative detailing Project Specific Requirements. The narrative should describe how the offeror intends to successfully complete work awarded under this MACC. The narrative plan shall not exceed five

(5) pages. Information beyond the five (5) pages will not be considered, except for the critical path schedule which is not included in the page limitation. The narrative shall, at a minimum, address the following topics:

• Offeror’s strategy for successful execution of work awarded under resulting MACC (e.g. managing multiple concurrent projects, managing the geographic coverage of the contract requirements, etc.)

• Offeror’s plan for accomplishing both Design-Build and Design-Bid-Build projects under this MACC.

• Offeror’s strategy for demolition of existing system and installation of new roofing that may include flashing, coping, exhaust hood removal and opening closure, and conduit rerouting.

• Offeror’s approach for schedule coordination of potential outages for the rerouting of existing conduit.

• Proposal to include certificates for the ECATTS trained contractor, the contractor, and the roof designer. If certificates are not available, provide explanation. Omission of this information may be considered less favorably.

• For the Demonstration Project, provide a narrative work plan for successful execution of the demonstration project that should address the major elements of work, project risks, and mitigations.

• Schedule: For the Demonstration Project, provide a Critical Path Schedule illustrating the offeror’s ability to achieve or improve on the construction duration of 180 calendar days. Identify key milestones for sequence of work as required to complete construction. The schedule shall demonstrate an understanding of the work to include the base CLIN and all options, a logical sequence of events to accomplish the work, and be sufficiently detailed to identify all of the major milestones.

o The schedule should include:

� Phasing Scheme � Primary Design and Construction Activities � Government Design reviews � Long lead items � And permit approvals as applicable o The schedule shall be based on a contract award date of 12 March 2025. This date is provided for proposal purposes only and is not dispositive of an anticipated/planned award date.

o If the offeror is proposing a shorter construction duration than 180 calendar days, their proposal shall include their proposed construction duration number of calendar days and justification for a shorter duration. At the Government’s discretion, the proposed number of days may be binding and used to calculate a construction completion date should the offeror be awarded the Demonstration Project. This calculated construction completion date will be included should the demonstration project be awarded. Proposed durations longer than the issued completion days will not be accepted.

The narrative will be evaluated to determine whether the offeror’s management approach will contribute to successful performance for this contract.

An Offeror that proposes a realistic and feasible schedule that is shorter than 180 calendar days from award must provide a justification. The Offeror may be considered more favorably in the overall evaluation of competitive proposals. Proposed completion dates in excess of 180 calendar days will be Unacceptable.

Proposals providing greater detail and demonstrating a greater understanding of the requirements, as outlined above, may be rated higher in the overall evaluation of competitive proposals.

(4) Factor 4 – Safety

The Days Away from Work, Restricted Duty, or Job Transfer (DART) Rate; and Total Case Rate (TCR) for the specified five (5) Calendar Years (CY), as well as a safety narrative as described further below. For a partnership, joint venture, the Offeror shall submit separate DART, TCR for the specified five (5) CY for each contractor who is part of the partnership or joint venture; however, only one safety narrative is required. Any fatalities experienced within this 5-year timeframe must be explained in detail, to include root cause and corrective actions.

NOTE: DART and TCR shall not be submitted for subcontractors

DART Rate: Submit five (5) previous complete calendar years’ [CY2023, CY2022, CY2021, CY2020, and

CY2019] worth of data (not an overall average). If the Offeror has no DART rate or a zero rate, for any year, affirmatively state so and explain why. If the DART rate calculation is 0.0, affirmatively state there were no DART cases during that year.

(2) Should a negative trend occur above moderate risk levels, an acceptable/detailed explanation is required, that includes any corrective actions taken…