AMENDMENT_0005.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

SOLICITATION N40080-14-R-8600, P572 INFRASTRUCTURE WIDEN RUSSELL ROAD, MARINE CORPS BASE, QUANTICO, VA

Continuation on Page 2

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 26

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 23-Apr-2014

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N40080-14-R-8600

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

18-Nov-2013

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

23-Apr-2014

CODE

NAVAL FACILITIES ENG COMMAND WASHINGTON

1314 HARWOOD ST SE, BLDG 212

WASHINGTON NAVY YARD DC 20374

N40080 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N40080-14-R-8600

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT FIVE

CONTINUATION PAGE

The purpose of this amendment is to accomplish the following:

Extend Proposal Due Date to May 13, 2014, time remains unchanged.

Revised Request for Proposal Table of Contents Incorporate Revised Price Schedule dated 4-23-2014 Incorporate Section 02 51 43 Incorporate Correct Wage Determination VA140135 Modification 1 dated 01/24/2014 Response to Pre-Proposal Inquiry

Amendment info

Part 2

Part 2; DELETE Table of Contents dated in its entirety and REPLACE with revised Table of Contents dated 22 April 2014.

Part 2; Section 01 14 00.05 20; Paragraph 1.2 a.: DELETE the paragraph in its entirety, and REPLACE with the following:

a. “The project area was a former munitions range being evaluated under the Department of Navy’s Munitions Range Program. Construction Support in accordance with section 02 51 43 shall be provided when performing all work below the ground surface. Ground surface shall be defined as the top of mineral soil. The Contractor shall bear all costs associated with attending the UXO briefing and the cost of the construction support during all the excavations.”

Part 2; Section 01 35 26.05 20; Page 5; Paragraph 1.5.1 a.: DELETE the paragraph in its entirety, and REPLACE with the following:

a. “The project area was a former munitions range being evaluated under the Department of Navy’s Munitions Range Program. Construction Support in accordance with section 02 51 43 shall be provided when performing all work below the ground surface. Ground surface shall be defined as the top of mineral soil. The Contractor shall bear all costs associated with attending the UXO briefing and the cost of the construction support during all the excavations.”

Part 3

Part 3, Chapter 3, 3.2.3 Soil Modification Requirements: DELETE the paragraph and items a-f in its entirety, and REPLACE with the following soil modification requirements:

“Soil improvement requirements shall apply, after clearing of all vegetation, and grading has been completed to sub-grade elevation. Contractor shall improve the existing soil, to the depth of 2.5' below finished subgrade elevation, under all structural areas, to a CBR value of 60. Should the Geotechnical Engineer advise on ameliorating to a depth of more than 2.5', the Contracting Officer must be notified for approval. If chemical treatment of soil is elected (lime, cement, fly-ash/cement, etc.), an experienced specialty contractor who has been doing such work for the last ten years, and is familiar with the soils on Navy, Marine and Air Force Bases in the area, must perform the work. Prior to starting the soil improvement work on the project site, Design-Build Contractor and the Specialty Contractor shall meet with the Contracting Officer to describe the soil improvement process, the materials to be used and the safety precautions to be taken, and receive Government approval.”

Part 3, Chapter 3, 3.1.2, item 3, Man Made Constraints: DELETE the paragraph its entirety, and REPLACE with the following:

P572 Russell Road: MCCDC toward Dunlap Circle, MCB Quantico, VA (April 22, 2014)

“There may be unexploded ordnance (UXO) in the project area. A map of the UXO area is provided in Part 6. There is the potential to encounter UXO throughout the project area; and there is a higher likelihood of encountering UXO within the area indicated on the drawings. Also, munitions will have to be removed before the contractor can perform construction in this area.”

1. Project Description

2. Project Objectives

3. Site Analysis

4. Building Requirements – Not used.

5. Room Requirements – Not used.

6. Engineering Systems Requirements

a. G10 Site Preparations

b. G20 Site Improvements

RFP Table of Contents

Part 2 Specifications

01 14 00.05 20 Work Restrictions for Design-Build

01 20 00.05 20 Price and Payment Procedures for Design-Build

01 30 00.05 20 Administrative Requirements for Design-Build

01 31 19.05 20 Post Award Meetings

01 32 17.05 20 Network Analysis Schedule (NAS) for Design-Build

01 33 00.05 20 Construction Submittal Procedures

01 33 10.05 20 Design Submittal Procedures

01 35 13.05 20 Special Project Procedures for Design-Build

01 35 26.05 20 Government Safety Requirements for Design-Build

01 45 00.05 20 Design and Construction Quality Control

01 50 00.05 20 Temporary Facilities and Controls for Design-Build

01 57 19.00 20 Temporary Environmental Controls

01 57 19.01 20 Supplemental Temporary Environmental Controls

01 74 19.05 20 Construction and Demolition Waste Management for Design-Build

01 78 24.00 20 Facility Electronic Operation and Maintenance Support Information (eOMSI)

01 78 30.00 23 02 51 43

CADD Data for GIS Deliverables Construction Support for Munitions and Explosives of Concern

Part 3 Project Program

c. G30 Site Mechanical Utilities

d. G40 Site Electrical Utilities

Part 4 Performance Technical Specifications

a. G10 Site Preparations

b. G20 Site Improvements

c. G30 Site Mechanical Utilities

d. G40 Site Electrical Utilities

e. Z10 General Performance Technical Specification

Part 5 Prescriptive Specifications

Not used Part 6 Attachments

1 Unexploded Ordinance and Telecommunications Maps

2 PAP (Performance Assessments Plan) Form

3 BVD (Best Value Determination Guidelines) Enclosure 2

4 PROD (Permits Record of Decisions) Form

5 Construction Waste Management Report

6 Fire & Emergency Services Facility Design & Construction Requirements

7 Quantico Contractor Screening Policy

8 Virginia Quarantine for Movement of Ash Materials in Prince William & Fauquier Counties, Virginia

9 Water Programs Application Guidance

10 P-307 Navy Crane Center

11 9 VAC 5 Chapter 40 Article 39 Air Pollution Abatement

12 Traffic Study

13 Geotechnical Report

14 Wetlands Delineation Report

15 Environmental Assessment Report

16 Drawings (Bound separately)

SECTION 02 51 43

CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT FOR

MUNITIONS AND EXPLOSIVES OF

CONCERN

1. PART 1 GENERAL

1.1. GENERAL DESCRIPTION

The Department of Navy, NAVFAC Washington, performed a Site Investigation which identified 40 mm, 60mm, and 81 mm rounds (type unidentifiable) within UXO 013A, and UXO 024. As a basis for bid the Contractor shall provide UXO oversight to ensure the safety of the contractor’s personnel on site. The

1.2. REFERENCES

The publications listed below form a part of this specification to the extent referenced. The publications are referred to within the text by the basic designation only.

DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE EXPLOSIVES SAFETY BOARD

TP 18 ...........................Minimum Qualifications for Unexploded Ordnance (UXO) Technicians and Personnel

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS (USACE)

EM 385-1-1 ......................(2003) Safety -- Safety and Health Requirements

ER 385-1-95 .....................(2007)Safety and Health Requirements For

Munitions and Explosives of Concern (MEC) Operations

1.3. SUBMITTALS

THE FOLLOWING SHALL BE SUBMITTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH Section 01 33 00 SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES, except that all submittals in this section designated as G-M shall also be submitted to the Marine Corps Systems Command; Attn: Project Manager Ammunition, 39 Tech Parkway, Suite 211, Stafford, Virginia 22556 through the Contracting Officer:

SD-01 Preconstruction Submittals Personnel

Qualifications; G

Explosive Safety Submission Determination Request; G-M

1.4. UNEXPLODED ORDNANCE (UXO) PERSONNEL

UXO personnel shall be U.S. citizens and meet the requirements specified in DDESB TP-18 for their respective positions. UXO personnel shall answer to the Site Safety and Health Officer (SSHO), and have the authority to stop work for matters of munitions safety.

1.4. WORK UNIT

1.4.1.Team Composition

a. Only UXO qualified personnel shall be involved in MEC procedures. Non-UXO qualified personnel may be utilized to perform MEC-related procedures when supervised by qualified UXO personnel. All personnel engaged in construction operations shall be thoroughly trained in explosive safety and be capable of recognizing hazardous explosive exposures.

b. Work shall not be performed in in areas not already cleared of MEC.

c. For work in areas that have already been designated cleared of ordnance, a team consisting of a UXO Technician III, and a UXO Technician II or UXO Technician I shall be readily available on site within the range construction limits.

d. The minimum team separation distance for all teams is the greater of 60,960 mm or the K50 distance of the most probable munitions (MPM) for the OE area.

e. The UXO technician III shall supervise all MEC tasks and UXO teams. This individual may supervise other than UXO teams such as brush- clearing teams. When non-MEC teams are under the direct supervision of someone other than a UXO Technician III, the teams shall be accompanied by a UXO Technician II who will provide MEC avoidance support.

• UXO Sweep Personnel shall not excavate anomalies nor handle MEC. 1.4.2.Work

Hours

All MEC work shall be performed during daylight hours with suitable visibility. UXO personnel shall perform MEC-related tasks no more than 10 hours per day for a maximum of 40 hours per week. Two consecutive weeks shall be separated by 48 hours of rest.

2. PART 2 PRODUCTS

2.1. Security

The Contractor is responsible for providing physical security to prevent the theft of explosives. The degree of physical security shall comply with installation requirements.

3. PART 3 EXECUTION

3.1. CONSTRUCTION SUPPORT

The Contractor shall provide construction support or standby support IAW requirements of Engineer Pamphlet (EP) 75-1-2. Construction support is inspection of suspect MEC found on the site during construction activities, disposal of confirmed MEC, oversight of construction operations to identify potential MEC risks, investigative clearance of areas not included that are found to pose a moderate to high risk of encountering MEC, down hole monitoring, and anomaly avoidance.

3.1.1. MEC Avoidance for Non-Intrusive Activities

The Contractor shall utilize UXO qualified personnel to escort all survey crews, brush-cutting crews, geotechnical crews and similar crews as they access the construction area to perform the work required under this contract. The UXO qualified personnel shall, for this type of work, provide UXO avoidance support. UXO avoidance consists of on-site UXO-qualified identifying safe work locations and safe work practices within areas potentially containing hazardous surface or subsurface MEC. If, after a site inspection of the Contractor's UXO qualified personnel determine that MEC avoidance support is not necessary in a specific area, this area can be clearly marked by the Contractor and MEC avoidance support within that area terminated.

3.1.2. MEC avoidance for Incidental Intrusive Activities

For all the contractor's activities that require incidental, shallow excavation, including but not limited to:placing survey stakes into the ground, setting fence and sign posts, pile driving, trenching, or setting silt fences, the Contractor shall first investigate the specific location to be disturbed with an approved magnetometer. If an apparent metallic anomaly is detected by the magnetometer, a different, nearby location free of apparent metallic anomalies shall be selected and designated. The incidental shallow excavation shall be moved to that location.

3.1.3. Vehicular Traffic Areas

UXO avoidance techniques shall be employed in establishing vehicle access throughout MEC contaminated areas.

3.2. TIME EXTENSIONS FOR UNUSUALLY SEVERE WEATHER

Hot or cold weather does not constitute severe weather and is not subject to this clause nor does it justify time extension. This provision specifies the procedure for determination of time extensions for unusually severe weather. In order for the Contracting Officer to award a time extension under this clause, the following conditions must be satisfied:

a. The weather experienced at the project site during the contract period must be unusually severe, i.e. more severe than the adverse weather anticipated for the project during the given month.

b. The unusually severe weather must actually cause a delay to the completion of the project.

The delay must be beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the Contractor.

Upon acknowledgment of the Notice to Proceed (NTP) and continuing throughout the contract, the Contractor shall record on the daily Contractor Quality Control (CQC) report, the occurrence of adverse weather and resultant impact to normally scheduled work. Actual adverse weather delay days must prevent work on critical activities for fifty percent (50%) or more of the Contractor's scheduled workday. The number of actual adverse weather delay days shall include days impacted by actual adverse weather (even if adverse weather occurred in previous month) and be calculated chronologically from the first to the last day of each month, and be recorded as full days. If the number of actual adverse weather delay days exceeds the number of days anticipated above, the Contracting Officer will convert any qualifying delays to calendar days, giving full consideration for equivalent fair weather work days, and issue a modification to the Contract.

3.3. AREAS CLEARED OF MEC

The Contractor shall mark the limits of MEC areas cleared for construction operations as required for construction safety purposes.

3.3.1. Identification of Responsible Personnel

Each report shall identify the specific members and title of the Contractor's staff and subcontractors that had significant and specific input into the preparation or review of the report.

-- End of Section --

PRICE SCHEDULE

REVISED 4-23-2014

P-572, RUSSELL ROAD INFRASTRUCTURE, PHASE III

(RUSSELL ROAD WIDENING: MCCDC toward DUNLAP CIRCLE)

MARINE CORPS BASE, QUANTICO, VIRGINIA

ITEM DESCRIPTION PRICE

0001 Basis of proposal for Item 0001 shall be complete and useable roadway widening and associated improvements from station 79+00 to station 143+79, complete in accordance with the RFP specifications and drawings, but not including work indicated or specified to be provided under any of the other items.

Price for all work except the work listed in the other items or options.

0001A Regarding Part 3, Chapter 3, 3.2.3 and Part 4, Section G103004, paragraph 1.2 and, provide the following: Remove unsatisfactory soil and material and replace with new satisfactory soil and material (including but not limited to soil/material, backfilling and compaction). Unsatisfactory soil and material shall be removed from Government property and properly disposed of by the Contractor. For the purposes of this solicitation, assume quantity of unsatisfactory soil and material to be 27,580 cubic yards.

PRICE FOR ITEM 0001A:

$1.53/Cubic Yard 27,580 Cubic Yard = $__________

OPTIONS

0002 OPTION ITEM 1

Basis of proposal for Item 0001A shall be complete and useable roadway widening and associated improvements from station 143+79 to station 146+79, complete in accordance with the RFP specifications and drawings, but not including work indicated or specified to be provided under any of the other items.

0003 OPTION ITEM 2

Basis of proposal for Item 0001B shall be complete and useable roadway widening and associated improvements from station 146+79 to station 149+79, complete in accordance with the RFP specifications and drawings, but not including work indicated or specified to be provided under any of the other items.

TOTAL PRICE FOR ITEMS 0001 thru 0001A $ _______

TOTAL PRICE FOR OPTION 0002 $ _______

TOTAL PRICE FOR OPTIONS 0003 $ _______

TOTAL PRICE FOR ALL ITEMS 0001 thru 0003 $ _______

Notes:

(1) Offeror shall provide a price for all items on the Price Schedule.

(2) A firm fixed price is required for each item and no provision will be made for economic price adjustments.

(3) The Design Build Budget is $12,400,000 and is inclusive of Items 0001 thru 0003.

(4) The Offeror’s price is valid for 60 days from the receipt of proposals.

(5) It is noted that in addition to other requirements, the Base Bid also includes full design services for Base Bid Items. Design services are included in the scope (and cost) of all Option Items.

(6) Options will be evaluated in accordance with 52.217-5 Evaluation of Options.

(7) OPTION ITEM(s) 1: OPTION ITEMS may be awarded at time of award. Each Item is

“option” in price. For each Item, Offeror must include on the price schedule the cost, in addition to Item 0001, to perform each item of work. A firm fixed price is required for the Base Bid and Items. No provision is made for economic price adjustment.

(8) Offeror shall submit their best price for this project, inclusive of Item 0001 and all Options.

Name & Address of Firm Submitting Offer:

Signature: ___________________________________

Phone: ______________________________________

Email: ______________________________________

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF AMENDMENT(S):___________________________

WAGE DETERMINATION

General Decision Number: VA140135 01/24/2014 VA135

Superseded General Decision Number: VA20130146

State: Virginia

Construction Type: Highway

Counties: Alexandria*, Arlington, Clarke, Culpeper, Fairfax, Fairfax*, Falls Church*, Fauquier, Fredericksburg*, King George, Loudoun, Manassas Park*, Manassas*, Prince William, Spotsylvania, Stafford and Warren Counties in Virginia.

*INDEPENDENT CITIES

HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS (excluding tunnels, building structures in rest area projects & railroad construction;

bascule, suspension & spandrel arch bridges designed for commercial navigation, bridges involving marine construction;

and other major bridges).

Modification Number Publication Date 0 01/03/2014 1 01/24/2014

SUVA2013-010 09/20/2013

Rates Fringes

ASBESTOS WORKER..................$ 16.91

CARPENTER (STRUCTURE)............$ 16.02

CEMENT MASON/CONCRETE FINISHER...$ 21.71

ELECTRICIAN......................$ 29.27

FORM SETTER......................$ 14.00

IRONWORKER, REINFORCING..........$ 34.18

IRONWORKER, STRUCTURAL...........$ 19.13

LABORER

Asphalt Raker...............$ 15.85

Blaster.....................$ 35.00 Construction Worker I (Skilled Laborer)...........$ 15.77 Construction Worker II (Laborer)...................$ 14.14 Deckhand....................$ 13.00 Fence Erector...............$ 14.41 Flagger.....................$ 13.64 Grade Checker...............$ 13.42 Guardrail Erector...........$ 22.15 Landscape Worker............$ 11.97 Pipe Layer..................$ 19.00 Power Tool Operator.........$ 15.00 Sign Erector................$ 25.00

MASON (STRUCTURE)................$ 17.64

PAINTER..........................$ 15.00

PLUMBER..........................$ 25.00

POWER EQUIPMENT OPERATOR:

Air Compressor..............$ 13.50 Asphalt Distributor.........$ 18.64 Asphalt Paver...............$ 19.35 Backhoe.....................$ 20.59 Boom/Auger..................$ 20.29 Bulldozer (Utility).........$ 15.50 Bulldozer...................$ 20.40 Concrete Finish Machine Operator....................$ 18.54 Concrete Finisher Machine Screed Operator (Bridge)....$ 14.60 Concrete Paving Machine Operator....................$ 20.75 Concrete Pump Operator......$ 33.00 Concrete Saw Operator.......$ 16.00 Crane, Derrick, Dragline (1 cm & under)..............$ 24.53 Crane, Derrick, Dragline (over 1 cm).................$ 25.00 Crusher Tender..............$ 14.25 Drill Operator..............$ 15.70 Excavator (Gradall).........$ 19.32 Front End Loader (2 cm & under)......................$ 19.00 Front End Loader (over 2 cm).........................$ 20.42 Hydro Seeder................$ 17.13 Log Skidder Operator........$ 18.50

Mechanic....................$ 21.75 Mobile Mixer................$ 17.00 Motor Grader (Fine Grade)...$ 27.25 Motor Grader (Rough Grade)..$ 13.58 Oiler, Greaser..............$ 14.00 Pavement Marking Operator...$ 17.00 Pavement Marking Truck Operator....................$ 16.72 Pavement Planing Groundman..$ 19.75 Pavement Planing Operator...$ 19.25 Pile Driver Operator........$ 20.35 Pile Driver, Leadsman.......$ 21.32 Pipe Boring/Jacking Machine Operator............$ 16.00 Plant Operator..............$ 14.88 Roller (Finish).............$ 17.94 Roller (Rough)..............$ 17.06 Scraper Pan Operator........$ 13.00 Shot Blast Machine Operator.$ 16.02 Shovel Operator (2 yds and under)......................$ 16.00 Shovel Operator (over 2 yds)........................$ 25.00 Slip-Form Paver.............$ 21.00 Slurry Seal Paver Machine Operator....................$ 13.75 Slurry Seal Paver Truck Operator....................$ 10.32 Stabilizer Operator.........$ 15.70 Stone-Spreader..............$ 13.35 Subgrade Machine Operator...$ 19.00 Tractor Operator, Crawlers..$ 12.47 Tractor Operator, Utility...$ 12.25 Trenching Machine...........$ 29.87 Vacuum Machine..............$ 18.20

TRAFFIC SIGNALIZATION:

Traffic Signal Installation......$ 21.16

TRUCK DRIVER

Fuel & Lubricant Service Truck Driver................$ 17.73 Transit Mix Truck Driver....$ 15.00 Truck Driver (Multi-Rear Axle).......................$ 16.69 Truck Driver (Single Rear Axle).......................$ 17.50 Truck Driver (Tandem Rear Axle).......................$ 16.91 Truck Driver, Heavy Duty....$ 17.29

WELDER...........................$ 18.15

WELDERS - Receive rate prescribed for craft performing operation to which welding is incidental.

Unlisted classifications needed for work not included within the scope of the classifications listed may be added after award only as provided in the labor standards contract clauses (29CFR 5.5 (a) (1) (ii)).

The body of each wage determination lists the classification and wage rates that have been found to be prevailing for the cited type(s) of construction in the area covered by the wage determination. The classifications are listed in alphabetical order of "identifiers" that indicate whether the particular rate is union or non-union.

Union Identifiers

An identifier enclosed in dotted lines beginning with characters other than "SU" denotes that the union classification and rate have found to be prevailing for that classification. Example: PLUM0198-005 07/01/2011. The first four letters , PLUM, indicate the international union and the four-digit number, 0198, that follows indicates the local union number or district council number where applicable , i.e., Plumbers Local 0198. The next number, 005 in the example, is an internal number used in processing the wage determination.

The date, 07/01/2011, following these characters is the effective date of the most current negotiated rate/collective bargaining agreement which would be July 1, 2011 in the above example.

Union prevailing wage rates will be updated to reflect any changes in the collective bargaining agreements governing the rates.

0000/9999: weighted union wage rates will be published annually each January.

Non-Union Identifiers

Classifications listed under an "SU" identifier were derived from survey data by computing average rates and are not union rates; however, the data used in computing these rates may include both union and non-union data. Example: SULA2004-007

5/13/2010. SU indicates the rates are not union majority rates, LA indicates the State of Louisiana; 2004 is the year of the survey; and 007 is an internal number used in producing the wage determination. A 1993 or later date, 5/13/2010, indicates the classifications and rates under that identifier were issued as a General Wage Determination on that date.

Survey wage rates will remain in effect and will not change until a new survey is conducted.

WAGE DETERMINATION APPEALS PROCESS

1.) Has there been an initial decision in the matter? This can be:

* an existing published wage determination

* a survey underlying a wage determination

* a Wage and Hour Division letter setting forth a position on a wage determination matter

* a conformance (additional classification and rate) ruling

On survey related matters, initial contact, including requests for summaries of surveys, should be with the Wage and Hour Regional Office for the area in which the survey was conducted because those Regional Offices have responsibility for the Davis-Bacon survey program. If the response from this initial contact is not satisfactory, then the process described in 2.)

and 3.) should be followed.

With regard to any other matter not yet ripe for the formal process described here, initial contact should be with the Branch of Construction Wage Determinations. Write to:

Branch of Construction Wage Determinations Wage and Hour Division U.S. Department of Labor 200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20210

2.) If the answer to the question in 1.) is yes, then an interested party (those affected by the action) can request review and reconsideration from the Wage and Hour Administrator (See 29 CFR Part 1.8 and 29 CFR Part 7). Write to:

Wage and Hour Administrator U.S. Department of Labor 200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20210

The request should be accompanied by a full statement of the interested party's position and by any information (wage payment data, project description, area practice material, etc.) that the requestor considers relevant to the issue.

3.) If the decision of the Administrator is not favorable, an interested party may appeal directly to the Administrative Review Board (formerly the Wage Appeals Board). Write to:

Administrative Review Board U.S. Department of Labor 200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.

Washington, DC 20210

4.) All decisions by the Administrative Review Board are final.

END OF GENERAL DECISION

RESPONSE TO PRE PROPOSAL INQUIRIES

1. Project Program Part 3.2.2 requires that the Design-Build Contractor shall provide a traffic study to be inclusive of the Russell Road corridor between Route 1 and Catlin Avenue, and consistent with VDOT’s “Traffic Impact Analysis Regulations and Administrative Guidelines” (VDOT, July 2008). Attachment 12 to the proposal “Russell Road Traffic Study” prepared by PHR&A and dated June 21, 2012 appears to address the requirements of Part 3.2.2. Is the Design-Build Contractor required to prepare a traffic study as outlined in Part 3.2.2?

RESPONSE: The traffic study provided in the RFP is from MCCDC entrance to Catlin Avenue. A new traffic study is required so that the design build team is able to comply with all the requirements stated in PART 3 –Chapter 3 Page 3 - paragraph 3.2.2 Traffic Study.

2. Engineering System Requirement G204002 requires the Design-Build Contractor to provide and install retaining walls as required by final design. Segmental/block walls technology is not permitted. Retaining walls shall be reinforced concrete walls with finished face to match existing retaining walls on site. Observed existing walls appear to all be segmental/block walls. Is it the intent to provide a reinforced concrete wall with a finished face resembling a segmental/block wall?

RESPONSE: Yes, the intent is for the reinforced concrete wall to have the same finish as the segmental block wall.

3. Project Program 3.2.3 Soil Modification Requirements requires that prior to the start of any soil work, all of the subgrade soils on the Project Site shall be modified and stabilized by use of Lime, Fly Ash & Cement or by Cement only, by an experienced specialty contractor who has been doing such work for the last ten years and is familiar with the soils on Navy, Marine and Air Force Bases in the area. The depth of soil modification shall be a minimum of 2.5’ or deeper as recommended by the soil modification specialty company engineer who is familiar and done work with the area soils. Are alternate forms of soil stabilization permissible?

RESPONSE: See attached amendment with changes to Part 3, Chapter 3, 3.2.3 Soil Modification Requirements.

4. Part 2 Project Specifications requires four design submittal packages:

• Concept Design presented at Concept Design Workshop

• Design Development in-progress

• Pre-final (100%) Design

• Final Design

Based on the level of information in the bridging document, is a Concept Design required as part of this project?

RESPONSE: Yes, as required by the RFP, a Concept Design is required.

5. Part 2: Project Specification Section 01 31 19.05 20 requires the Design Team to conduct an on-site Concept Design Workshop, typically conducted in four to six longer than normal working days. Based on the level of information in the bridging document:

a) Is a Concept Design Workshop required by this project?

RESPONSE: Yes.

b) If so, is it anticipated to require four to six working days to accomplish?

RESPONSE: It is acceptable for the Concept Design Workshop (CDW) to be accomplished in one day.

6. Project Program Part 3 - 1.0 (Project Description) notes the Government is currently performing a full archaeological survey and will make the information available to the Contractor. Then Project Program Section 6, G10 page 3 notes the Design Builder shall conduct the Phase III archaeological survey prior to construction.

a) Please clarify the responsibilities of the Design Build (DB) Contractor regarding archeological investigations surveys and SHPO coordination.

RESPONSE: Archaeological surveys for this site have been completed. No additional archaeological surveys and SHPO coordination are necessary at this time. Russell Road widening construction will require an archaeological monitor that meets the Secretary of Interior standards for archaeologist. The monitor must be on site during construction. Please also refer to the RFP, Part 2, section 01 57 19 00.20, paragraph 1.5.4.1 Archeologist.

b) Were the surveys or Phase III covered all proposed disturbed areas as noted on the PE drawings.

RESPONSE: Yes, the survey area covered all proposed disturbed areas as of August 2013.

c) If the DB is responsible for the Phase III investigations and SHPO coordination, is the contractor required to detail these investigations in the project schedule?

RESPONSE: The Design Builder is not responsible for Phase III investigations and SHPO coordination.

d) Is the DB allowed to begin Phase III work prior to plan and permit approvals at NTP?

RESPONSE: The Design Builder cannot begin construction prior to NCPC approval. Russell Road widening construction will require an archaeological monitor that meets the Secretary of Interior standards for archaeologist. The monitor must be on site during construction.

e) Will a UXO technician and UXO training be required for the data recovery work?

RESPONSE: Yes, a UXO technician and UXO training will be required for the data recovery work in accordance with Section 01 14 00.05 20 and Section 02 51 43 in Part 2. Section 02 51 43 provided with this amendment.

7. The previous Small Whorled Pogonia Survey according to the 24 Jul 12 Memorandum for the

Record in the Environmental Assessment notes the survey area only extended approximately 50 feet into the tree line from the existing roadway. However the preliminary engineering plans note several locations where slope grading and SWM facilities exceed the 50’ limit. Additionally the 35% plans do not appear to allow sufficient disturbance to address contraction scour and countermeasures at culvert extension locations.

a) Please verify the new survey limit will extend at a minimum to the proposed cut slopes, utility relocations, and facilities noted on the 35% PE plans or better.

RESPONSE: Yes, the new survey will cover these areas if it is deemed necessary by Quantico’s environmental branch (NREAB).

b) If not is the contractor responsible for additional survey areas?

RESPONSE: No, the contractor is not responsible to perform the survey.

8. In several locations it is noted that grading work cannot begin without a UXO Technician III in attendance. Please clarify if the DB Contractor is to provide the UXO Technician or if the government will provide one.

RESPONSE: See response to RFI 6, e in this amendment.

9. Section 01 35 26.05 (1.5.1) notes the contractor shall bear all costs associated with the UXO briefing and the cost of the UXO Tech III during all excavations. If the UXO technician is a military employee, please provide costs per hour for this personnel.

RESPONSE: See response to RFI 6, e in this amendment.

10. Attachment 15 contained an Environmental Assessment however we could not locate a Finding of No Significant Impact, or documentation regarding NCPC coordination status.

a) Please clarify the DB contractor responsibilities in regards to NEPA documentation and

NCPC coordination.

RESPONSE: The NEPA documentation has been completed. NCPC requirements stated in the RFP, Part 2, Section 01 33 10.05 20, paragraphs 1.8.4 thru 1.8.4.3 which state the Design Build Contractor’s responsibilities for NCPC.

b) Will the DB be responsible for obtaining a FONSI for the project?

RESPONSE: No, the NEPA documentation has been completed.

c) Will the DB be responsible for presenting the project to the NCPC or was that completed during the EA preparation?

RESPONSE: Yes, per the RFP, Part 2, Section 01 33 10.05 20, paragraph 1.8.4 Historic Preservation and Planning Commission Submission.

11. In the Environmental Assessment Section 4.2 Water Resources it is noted that the existing pipes will accommodate the widening of Russell Road and replacements are not expected.

a) Were hydrologic studies conducted to make this determination? If so please provide them.

RESPONSE: Preliminary investigations indicate that the existing culverts were adequate; however, the Designer of Record (DOR) is required to perform their own calculations based on the final road design.

b) No changes were noted in the PE drawings so for pricing purposes, should the contractor assume this statement is true and only price the extensions.

RESPONSE: The RFP drawings are concept drawings, the DOR is required to deliver a finished product per the requirements of the RFP.

12. Sections 01 33 10.05 20 and 1 33 10.05 20 (1.8.4 & 1.8.4.2)) notes the DB is to prepare the presentation materials required to obtain approval from the Historic Preservation and Planning Commissions having jurisdiction over the site, then goes on to note that submission will address the NCPC the CFA and the SHPO requirements as well noting the Contractor is to prepare a submittal package to present the project at a public meeting.

a) As no buildings are proposed for the project please verify this requirement is to be included in the Contractors bid.

RESPONSE: NCPC requirements stated in the RFP, Part 2, Section 01 33 10.05 20, paragraphs 1.8.4 thru 1.8.4.3 and are required as part of the Contractor’s bid regardless if no buildings are part of the contract. CFA does not apply to this project and SHPO has been completed.

b) If so, has any prior submission been conducted to these agencies for the project and provide prior submittal materials and prior comments from these agencies.

RESPONSE: No prior submissions have been conducted.

c) As this section notes a 3-6 month time frame for this coordination, is the contractor to include this coordination in the project schedule?

RESPONSE: Yes, the 3-6 month time frame shall be included in the project schedule.

13. Section 01 33 10.05 20 Page 9 (1.8.4.1) notes the DB is to prepare a submission to the SHPO, and that the action proponent files a NEPA compliance checklist plus a copy of the Work Request to the CRM and the CRM determines if the project will effect historic properties.

a) Given this project has been coordinated with the SHPO for the two archaeological sites, and an EA has been completed. Please clarify if SHPO and NCPC coordination and submittals are required in addition to those items noted in the MOA.

RESPONSE: Submission to NCPC is still required for this project.

b) Has a final data recovery plan been approved by the SHPO or is that to be a requirement of the DB contractor?

RESPONSE: 10/11/2013 received approval of the data management summary from VA DHR. Final report will be available Summer 2014.

c) If one has been prepared please provide a copy or a schedule for completion to assure our schedule incorporates the data recovery.

RESPONSE: The Data Management Summary Report will be provided to the successful offeror post award. The Design Builder is responsible to provide an archeological monitor as stated in RFI 6, a response in this amendment.

14. Part 4 Section G30 page 24 (1.1) Provide an oil /water separator to remove free oil and to provide grit protection upstream of oil/water separator.

Please verify this requirement is applicable to Phase 3.

RESPONSE: An oil / water separator is not required on this project. See stormwater requirements in Part 3.

15. Was a jurisdictional determination (JD) or a preliminary JD obtained for the delineation conducted? If so, please provide a copy.

RESPONSE: No, a JD process was initiated but the report was not obtained.

A Phase 3 report was submitted to the Army Corps of Engineers and a final determination from the USACE is pending.

16. It is noted that wetland mitigation through mitigation bank purchases is required for the project

a) There appears to be tidal wetland impacts and a quick search of the RIBITS database note no available tidal wetland credits, were tidal credits reserved for this project?

RESPONSE: Wetland credits were not obtained; the Design Build Team is required to obtain the required credits post award.

b) Are alternative forms of mitigation allowed?

RESPONSE: No, the Design Build Team is required to purchase credits.

c) Who is responsible for obtaining the mitigation and making payment for the wetland mitigation?

RESPONSE: As part of the overall project cost, the Design Build Team is required to obtain mitigation and make payment for the wetland mitigation. Wetland credits can be purchased from the following:

http://www.wetlandstudies.com/services/mitigation-banking.html

17. Given the project environmental constraints and narrow corridor, has NAVFAC identified any locations for potential contractor laydown areas, parking or offices?

RESPONSE: To be determined post award.

18. Please note given the recent regulatory agency changes, the E&S control Guidance appears to be outdated with regards to VSMP application fees, personnel and submittal requirements. Please verify this is the case for this project.

RESPONSE: Refer to PART 3 - CHAPTER 2 - Page 2 - 2.3.2 Storm Water Management (Low Impact Development).

The contractor is required to “Comply with applicable Virginia State SWM requirements.”

19. Please provide any existing utility agreements that the Base may have with the Private Utility

Companies/Operators located through the corridor.

RESPONSE: The following are the utility companies through the corridor: Verizon, Comcast, Columbia Gas, Base Water, Base Sewer, Base Electric, and G6.

20. The RFP documents depict proposed alignment and pathways for ductbanks and utility relocation. Have these locations already been coordinated with the Utility Operators?

RESPONSE: No. The locations shown on the plans are proposed locations; all coordination must be between the Design Build Team and the utility operators.

21. Contrary to Part 3-Chapter 1 - Page 1 Paragraph 5, the RFP documents depict a new communication relocation duct bank on the South Side of Russell Rd. Is this correct?

RESPONSE: The majority of the utilities will be on the North side of the road; however, utilities that exist on the southern part of the road will need to be relocated as indicated on the plans. The contractor is required to perform a utility survey as stated in the RFP Part 3, ESR G10 Site Preparation. The contractor is also required to perform a topographic survey.

22. Please provide utility relocation engineering plans or as-built documents for the Russell Road Phase 2 Project that the Phase 3 must tie-in and meet with.

RESPONSE: This information will not be available, prior to award of Phase III. The Government intends to provide when available, but this will not be a reason to delay the design or the project. In the event the Government does not have the necessary information when needed, or if the as-builts are deficient, incorrect, or missing any information, the Contractor for Phase 3 will coordinate with the contractor on Phase 2, or perform test pitting to verify actual location of any/all utilities in the field.

23. If in order to obtain the required Virginia Health Department (VDH) plan approval for the water main relocation, information on the water demands and hydraulic capacity of the Base water system is required. Will this information be provided to VDH by the Owner and not be the responsibility of the Contractor to provide to VDH to VDH’s satisfaction?

RESPONSE: A VDH permit is not required since the Base owns the utility.

24. If the Virginia Department of Health determines that the existing water main line sizes to be relocated are undersized and need to be replaced with larger diameter piping will the Contractor be required to determine the larger pipe size required and construct the larger pipe size without reimbursement?

RESPONSE: Coordination with VDH is not required since the Base owns the utility.

25. If the Virginia Department of Environmental Quality determines that the existing water main line sizes to be relocated are undersized and need to be replaced with larger diameter piping will the Contractor be required to determine the larger pipe size required and construct the larger pipe size without reimbursement?

RESPONSE: Coordination with VDEQ is not required since the Base owns the domestic water utility. However, a VDEQ permit is required for storm water management, per the RFP, Part 3, Chapter 2, 2.3.2 Storm Water Management (Low Impact Development).

26. Will the Base have sufficient valving to allow the new water and force main pipe connections to be cut in without the need for wet tap tapping sleeves and valve connections? Can there be a short interruption is water service and sewage service and will the Base coordinate notifications and pump station shut downs to allow cut in of the new piping?

RESPONSE: The Contractor is required to maintain water and sewage service at all times, unless an outage permit is requested by the Contractor and approved by the Government in writing. Valving is present, but if a wet tap is acceptable and is a sensible solution, then it may be considered by the Government. However, it is subject to approval post award. The Contractor is responsible for all outage notifications; however, NAVFAC will assist if necessary.

27. Does the Contractor have to do hydrant tests for the Basis of Design report per the above UFC 3- 200-10N requirement?

RESPONSE: Yes, hydrant tests are required.

28. There is concerned about the safety of the transition areas for the reversible lanes. Generally speaking reversible lanes add a lane during particular times of day. This reversible lane appears to be a bit unique in that (as shown in the plans) it requires traffic in one direction exit from the lane in the same general area that traffic is entering the lane from the opposite direction. This looks feasible on 35% plans, but the actual implementation of this lane striping would put a lot of confusing lines on the road. Does the Contractor assume liability for accidents that occur when the reversible lane is in operation if the design plans have been approved by the reviewing agencies?

RESPONSE: The Contractor is responsible for traffic control during construction.

29. Phase 3 contains extensive conduit and cabling (and water pipe) work that MUST be coordinated with the conduit and cabling work being performed in Phase 2. Is the Phase 2 contractor doing anything to facilitate this coordination? (See sheet C4.06A)

RESPONSE: The phase 2 Contractor is required to end new work at the nearest Manhole or Junction Box. The Contractor is required to perform their own utility survey post award to verify location of all utilities prior to start of design.

30. Will alternatives to reinforced concrete retaining walls, as specified in the VDOT Manuals of the Structure and Bridge Division - Volume V Series, Part 11 Geotechnical Manual for Structures, be allowed?

RESPONSE: No, it is a requirement from the base that these walls be reinforced concrete.

31. The RFP included the Scope of Work for an Archaeology Data Recovery (Phase III) dated October 5, 2012. Is the Contractor provision of this work included in the RFP, or has this work already been completed? If so, what areas were targeted for Phase III, and are any reports available for review? Temporary construction outside of the Limits of Disturbance shown on the 35% plans may be required to construct the project. We would like to review any existing Phase III reports to determine if all necessary areas were targeted, or if additional recovery work is required.

RESPONSE: See response to RFIs 6 and 13.

32. Did the USACE confirm the wetland delineations?

RESPONSE: See responses to RFIs 15 and 16.

33. Can the inverts of the existing storm drain culverts be provided in order to confirm whether or not the elevations are adequate for draining the proposed dry swales?

RESPONSE: The Contractor is required to perform a survey after award to complete the final design. The existing dry swales are designed to drain as indicated on the plans. Refer to existing conditions drawing # V1.06 for existing invert elevations.

34. Schedule Concern – Project Program Part 3 – Chapter 1 (page 2) states the Small Whorled

Pogonia (SWP) survey will be contracted by NAVFAC under a separate work order. The SWP survey is time-of-year restricted to 6/1 through 7/20. Please confirm this survey is already scheduled to occur in 2014 to avoid the potential for impacting the 18-month Russell Road DB schedule.

RESPONSE: See response to RFI 7, a in this amendment. If the survey is deemed necessary, it will occur in 2014.

(End of Summary of Changes)