N0042117R0054-0001.pdf
PDF 594 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N00421-17-R-0054
About this file
This document provides instructions for responding to a request for proposals for mission systems test and evaluation services. The solicitation seeks proposals for follow-on test and evaluation support services at various government sites, primarily in Patuxent River, Maryland but also in Point Mugu and China Lake, California. Proposals are due by May 23, 2019 and should follow the specified format and content requirements, including technical and management approaches, past performance, and cost/price volumes. The incumbent contractor is J.F. Taylor, Inc. The work involves testing avionics and CNS-ATM systems for various military aircraft and platforms to support certification requirements. Offerors must propose labor hours and fully burdened rates by labor category and year. The government estimates 854,400 labor hours over five years and provides other direct cost estimates. The opportunity is set aside for small businesses and work is to be performed primarily on government sites.
N00421-17-R-0054-0001
View the file
Other files
Show all 23
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT
Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.
15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)
30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30
APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84
STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83)
Prescribed by GSA
FAR (48 CFR) 53.243
See Section A.
1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES
S 1 39
16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)
16C. DATE SIGNED
BY 25-Apr-2019
16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR
(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)
8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N0042117R0054
X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)
18-Apr-2019
10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)
9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.
11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS
X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.
Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:
(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;
or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE
RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN
REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.
12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)
13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.
IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.
A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE
CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.
B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).
C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:
D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)
E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.
14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)
10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.
2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)
6. ISSUED BY
3. EFFECTIVE DATE
25-Apr-2019
CODE
NAVAL AIR SYSTEMS COMMAND
AIR-2.3.3.1 SUITE 155 BLDG 2272
47123 BUSE ROAD UNIT IPT
PATUXENT RIVER MD 20670
N00019 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)
4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.
CODE
See Item 6
FACILITY CODECODE
EMAIL:TEL:
N0042117R0054
SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE
SUMMARY OF CHANGES
SECTION A - SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM
The following have been added by full text:
AMENDMENT 01
The purpose of this modification is to update the following section of the solicitation:
1. Update Section L, Part B paragraph 1.3.2 Key Personnel Resume table.
2. Update Section L, Part B paragraph 3.5.2 Labor Hour Table.
SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS
The following have been modified:
CONTENT OF PROPOSALS
L – [2] CONTENT OF PROPOSALS (SERVICES) – March 2019
PART A GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS
1.0 GENERAL
The Offeror must respond to all requirements of the solicitation and not alter or rearrange the solicitation. The
Offeror is advised that the Government may incorporate any portions of the Offeror’s proposal into the resulting contract.
In presenting material in the proposal, the Offeror is advised that quality of information is more important than quantity. Clarity, brevity, and logical organization shall be emphasized during proposal preparation. Statements that the prospective Offeror understands, can comply with, or will comply with, the specifications, and paraphrasing the requirements or parts thereof without supporting information are considered inadequate by the Government, and may result in assessing weaknesses and/or deficiencies.
The Offeror must include any data that illustrates the adequacy of the various assumptions, approaches, and solutions to problems. Failure to address a specific factor or subfactor clearly may be considered a deficiency.
Unnecessarily elaborate brochures or other presentation materials beyond that sufficient to present a complete and effective proposal is neither necessary nor desired.
The Government advises the Offeror that taking exception or deviating from any term or condition of the RFP may result in the assessment of a deficiency to the proposal.
Throughout these instructions, a “principal subcontractor” is defined as a subcontractor who provides at least 20% of the proposed total cost/price (excluding the Offeror’s profit/fee), for the contract or provides one or more Key
Personnel. “JV Team member” is defined as one of the entities that make up a joint venture (JV) formed for the purpose of responding to this solicitation.
Questions: Offerors may submit questions requesting clarification of solicitation requirements by emailing the contract specialist at allison.kohut@navy.mil and the contracting officer May Dimitrov at may.dimitrov@navy.mil.
It is required that all questions be received within 10 calendar days of the date this solicitation is issued.
2.0 PROPOSAL FORMAT
Written proposals must be formatted using a Times New Roman 12 pt. Normal font (no reduction permitted), single-spaced with 1-inch margins all around, and formatted for standard 8.5 x 11-inch paper. All pages should be numbered with section and page numbers. When foldout pages are used they must not exceed 11 x 17 inches and will be counted as 1 page. Drawings may be provided separately and may be any size but should be folded to approximately 8.5 x 11-inch standard size and will count as 1 page. Graphs and tables shall be presented in no smaller than a 10 pt. font and should contain a grid, which allows values to be read directly from the graph. Graphic resolution, including such data as tables or charts, should be consistent with the purpose of the data presented.
The Offeror will provide one complete copy of the proposal to the Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO) as electronic files fully compatible with Microsoft 10 and for information not supported by MS Office products, with the latest Adobe Acrobat reader on a CD-ROM.
mailto:allison.kohut@navy.mil mailto:may.dimitrov@navy.mil
3.0 PROPOSAL CONTENT AND VOLUMES
The Offeror must present proposal information in a manner that facilitates a one-to-one comparison between the information presented and this Proposal Instruction. Proposal information must be structured such that its
Volume/paragraph number matches the Proposal Instructions Volume/paragraph number provided in section “Part B
Specific Instructions” to which it is responding, although the Offeror may add lower tier subparagraphs. The
Offeror must provide reasons it will not provide information for a particular paragraph. The proposal information instructions are structured by paragraph numbers where first, second, third, and fourth parts correspond to the volume, section, and element, etc., in the Offeror’s proposal.
Each volume of the proposal shall be submitted as one original and additional copies as specified in the table below.
The table below supersedes the copies requested in Block 9 of the Standard Form (SF) 33. All volumes of the original proposal shall be delivered to the address provided in Section 4.0 prior to the closing date/time stated in this solicitation. Page limitations for each volume, if any, are also specified in the table below; title and table of contents pages do not count towards the page limit. Note: Any pages submitted exceeding the page limit shall be disregarded and NOT evaluated.
Information submitted as an Annex to the proposal includes manuals, specifications, plans, procedures, and policies that exist as an official document of the company or facility, as well as other information requested in Part B
Specific Instructions. Page limitations for Annexes, if any, are specified below. The authorized Annexes are summarized in the table below.
Volume
Number Volume Title Required Page Limit Copies Required
1.0 Technical 1 Original/3 Copies/1 CD-ROM
1.1 Understanding of the Work (3 Sample Tasks)
3 pages/Task
9 pages total
1.2 Management Approach 10 page limit
1.3 Workforce 2 pages per resume
2.0 Past Performance No Page Limit 1 Original/3 Copies/1 CD-ROM
3.0 Cost/Price No Page Limit 1 Original/1 Copies/1 CD-ROM
Annex 1 Past Performance Contract Data No Page Limit 1 Original/3 Copies/1 CD-ROM
Each volume shall contain the following information:
-Cover and title page
-Title of proposal and proposal number as applicable
-Offeror’s name, address, and POC
-RFP number
-Proposal volume number
-Copy number
-Table of Contents (The table of contents must provide sufficient detail to enable easy location of important elements)
-Use tabs and dividers
The Offeror shall submit a Cross Reference Matrix (CRM) for the Technical Volume, similar to the example below, to help ensure that all solicitation requirements are addressed and to facilitate the evaluators’ review of the Offeror’s proposal. The CRM should be a single integrated matrix and cross-reference the proposal volumes and paragraphs to specific RFP requirements, as well as other parts of the proposal that contain relevant information. The Offeror’s
CRM may be identical to the example below or revised such as to add columns to indicate the page number on which information may be found, identify where other relevant information in the proposal is located, or provide other comments. The CRM does not count against any of the proposal page limitations.
EXAMPLE OF A CROSS REFERENCE MATRIX (CRM)
4.0 PROPOSAL SUBMISSION:
Clearly mark all packages with the solicitation number. The submission date for all Volumes shall be no later than
May 23, 2019 at 1500 EST.
Offeror shall submit proposals via United States Postal Service or through a commercial carrier using the address provided below. Offeror shall not submit proposals by facsimile or electronically via email.
Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Division
Attn: Allison M. Kohut, 2.5.1.12.7
21983 Bundy Road, Building 441
Patuxent River, MD 20670
The outside shipping packaging shall be marked with RFP# N00421-17-R-0054.
Hand carried proposals may be delivered to the address above, attention (PCO) and/or (Specialist).
5.0 PROPOSAL PACKAGING:
The Offeror shall package the proposal volumes in cartons or equivalent packaging containers in the most efficient manner possible grouping like volumes to the maximum extent possible. Each container shall be single person portable. One container shall include all Original Proposal volumes including the original/signed documents submitted as part of Volume 3 Cost/Price.
Each box should include a packing slip detailing the contents to include the volume number, title, and copy number.
Also, each box should be stamped or marked “For Official Use Only” and “Source Selection Information – See FAR
2.101 and 3.104.”
6.0 CLASSIFIED DATA
All proposals must be UNCLASSIFIED.
7.0 SOLICITATION CHANGES
Section L –
Proposal
Instructions Government SOW/PWS
Section M –
Evaluation
Factor Offeror’s Proposal Reference
CLIN
Reference
Volume 1
Technical
Example: Para 3.1
Note: This column shall address all paragraphs in
Sections xx and xy of the
SOW/PWS.
2.A Provide reference to Offeror’s
Proposal Volume I – Technical.
Example: Refer to appropriate page number in Offeror’s written proposal
For notice of any changes and additional information provided by the Government for the solicitation, please go to www.FedBizOpps.gov.
PART B SPECIFIC INSTRUCTIONS
Cost or pricing information shall only appear in the Cost/Price volume.
1.0 VOLUME 1: TECHNICAL
Note: This volume shall not contain any reference to cost or price aspects of the offer.
1.1 The purpose of the Executive Summary is to provide the evaluators with an overview of the Offeror’s proposal and strategy. The Offeror shall include the following in this volume:
1.1.1 Offeror Summary Table: The Offeror shall complete the table below. The Offeror should include all subcontractors and team members who will be involved with the performance or management of the program work and should list all sites where the work will be performed. If a teaming or subcontracting arrangement is proposed, identify the work share, distribution elements, and ratios that each Contractor will perform using the table below.
Also provide a definition of the legal relationship between the entities if it is other than a Prime/subcontractor relationship. The Offeror shall provide a written explanation if multiple CAGE codes/DUNS for the same physical location are provided in the table below (Offeror Summary Table). The written explanation shall detail the distinct roles and responsibilities for entities with different CAGE codes/DUNs at the same physical location for where the work is being performed or from where the work is being directed. The description shall include all changes in the organization as a result of a corporate acquisition, reorganization, merger, or other administrative reason.
Contractor Name
(Indicate Prime, Team Member or
Subcontractor)
CAGE Code, and DUNS Code
( if applicable)
Place of
Performance
Brief Work
Description and/or
Program
Responsibility
Cognizant
DCMA Office and DCAA
Office Contact
Information
% of Total
Proposed
Price
% OF TOTAL PROPOSED PRICE (Must add up to 100%) 100%
1.1.2 Signed SF33 for basic solicitation and each amendment; including completion of any RFP clause or provision that requires a fill-in or response.
1.1.3 Signed Representations, Certifications and Acknowledgements and/or OnLine Representations and
Certifications Application (ORCA) reference.
1.1.4 Affirmation of no Exceptions, Deviations or Waivers.
1.1.5 Guarantee the length of proposal validity (at least 180 days after proposal submission).
1.1.6 Written consent from principal subcontractors and critical team members that will allow the Government to coordinate potential past performance and/or cost/price issues with the Offeror.
1.1 VOLUME 1: Understanding of the Work
1.1 Sample Tasks:
http://www.fedbizopps.gov/
Sample Task # 1
Your task is to determine the compliance of military Identification Friend or Foe (IFF) and civil transponders with the FAA ADS-B 2020 mandate.
- What specific requirements documents would contain the test data to be collected?
- How would you define the scope and method of ground and flight tests?
- What data products and support facilities would be required?
- How and to who would you submit data to for certification and/or approval?
Sample Task # 2
Your task is to evaluate Required Navigation Performance Area Navigation (RNP RNAV) as installed on a new platform to support Communication Navigation Surveillance – Air Traffic Management (CNS-ATM) certification.
RNP RNAV reduces the separation minimum for civilian air traffic and usually requires changes in the navigation information that a platform displays and a robust test of the navigation solution while flying RNP RNAV procedures
- such as departures, arrivals, airways, and approaches.
- What documentation would you reference to determine your test criteria (assessment standards)?
- What resources would you require to support execution and data analysis?
- What processes would you follow to develop a test plan approved for execution AND author a test report approved for publication?
Sample Task # 3
Your task is to test and evaluate an avionics system, as installed in a USN or USMC aircraft.
Based on the type of aircraft, what developmental squadron would you coordinate with (examples are MH-60R, P-
3C, F/A-18)?
- Where would you seek a list of requirements to test to?
- What guidance document would you utilize during the generation of a test plan?
- How would you establish what the required deliverables will be, and how would you document the required deliverables during test planning?
- How would you establish the Risk Category of the test?
- What guidance document would you use to during the generation of the deliverables?
- How would you establish the mission impact of issues you discovered during test?
- Who will be the primary intended audience of the deliverables?
1.2 Management Approach
The offeror’ s management approach shall address the following:
1.2.1 Overall Management Approach: Offerors shall address in sufficient detail the following:
1.2.1.1 Adequacy of management and resources to support the technical requirements of the solicitation and ability to function as a viable and productive partner with the Government
1.2.1.2 Proposed management roles of the offeror’ s proposed workforce for this contract
1.2.1.3 Proposed lines of responsibility, authority, and communication through which the tasks will be managed
1.2.1.4 Procedures to be taken to ensure quality and cost control
1.2.1.5 Processes for managing at least three (3) task orders per year from start to finish, including the role of the offeror’ s task order manager in product/process quality and how these functions are accommodated in the acquisition and overhead structures
1.2.1.6 Plan for early identification and resolution of problems; and
1.2.1.7 Identification of potential performance risks and proposed risk mitigation strategies
1.2.2 Usage of Teaming, Personnel, and Subcontractors: Offerors shall present in sufficient detail the following:
1.2.2.1 Subcontract Management Approach. Prime Contractor shall detail how the subcontractors shall be managed to ensure cohesive integration into the overall management approach;
1.2.2.2 Description of the integration of the teaming partners into the overall management approach and how the offeror shall leverage their strengths to increase value to the customer through technical leadership, quality assurance, and process improvement;
1.2.2.3 How and why selected subcontractor(s) were chosen, which knowledge and skills the offeror shall be acquiring through each subcontract, the level of subcontract effort expected;
1.2.2.4 How the offeror shall maintain control during the performance of work, and
1.2.2.5 What percentage of the total proposed contract value represents subcontract awards to small business concerns.
1.2.3 Qualification/Recruitment/Retention: Offerors shall present in sufficient detail the following:
1.2.3.1 Offerors shall present retention plan to include but not limited to: qualification/recruitment/retention procedures that would provide workforce improvements and upgrade the skills of highly trained and motivated personnel. For personnel who are not current or contingent hires, offerors shall describe their plan for hiring qualified personnel.
1.2.4 Transition Plan: The services under this solicitation are vital to the Government and must be continued without interruption. The offeror is required to submit a written narrative delineating a transition plan based on a 30-day period after award that ensures a smooth workplace changeover from an incumbent with no loss of service and minimal loss of corporate knowledge. The plan should take into consideration the following elements as well as any additional elements deemed necessary by the offeror:
1.2.4.1 Work Turnover. The offeror shall provide a plan of action to effectively transfer tasked work that is in process at the expiration of the current contract from the incumbent to the successful offeror.
1.2.4.2 NMCI. Desktop Issues. The offeror shall provide a plan of action to address NMCI transfers between the incumbent and the successful offeror.
1.2.4.3 Quality Assurance. The offeror shall provide a plan of action to ensure continuation of quality review processes during the transition period from the incumbent to the successful offeror.
1.2.4.4 Training. The offeror shall provide a plan of action to implement personnel training
1.2.4.5 Risk Mitigation Strategies. The offeror shall provide a plan of action to mitigate contract performance risks encountered during the transition period.
1.2.4.6 Security Requirements to include OPSEC, facility clearances, and base access in accordance with the DoD
Contract Security Classification Specification, DD Form 254. The offeror shall provide a plan to implement the required security clearances and physical access requirements of the contract during the transition period so that service is not interrupted.
1.2.4.7 Data Transfer. The offeror shall provide a plan of action for the efficient inventory and transfer of program data from the incumbent to the successful offeror.
1.3 Workforce
The offeror shall provide the following information:
1.3.1 Key Labor Categories. The offeror shall submit a list of names of proposed key labor personnel.
1.3.2 Key Personnel Resumes.
The Key Personnel resumes to be evaluated are shown in the table below:
Key Labor Category Level Key FTEs to be
Evaluated
Program Manager Senior 1
Engineer Senior 6
Engineer Journeyman 3
The Key Labor Category Engineering Technician VI and a Systems Analyst, Senior will be evaluated at Task Order
Level in accordance with Clause 5252.237-9501 “Addition or Substitution of Key Personnel (Services).”
1.3.2.1 For any proposed Key Personnel provide a resume of the work assignments, training, etc., that demonstrates the experience and specialized qualifications of each key person proposed. Resumes shall contain, at a minimum, the following information:
− Employee name
− Years of employment experience in chronological order including narrative description of duties and responsibilities
− Current position, title and employer
− Educational history
− Institution name, degree or certification earned, and year for all degrees or certifications earned
− Current level of security clearance and status (final, interim, or pending)
1.3.2.2 The Government may check educational background to verify degrees or certifications received.
All contingent key personnel hires shall have a letter of intent submitted under Volume 4.0 (Cost/Price). The letter of intent is a separate written agreement signed by the potential employee(s) to work for the offeror effective at contract award. Subcontractors and team members either shall provide this information separately or include it in the prime contractor’s submission of this document. All proposed personnel shall meet the minimum labor category qualifications in Section C Statement of Work.
1.3.2.3 Key Personnel Update Requirement
Offerors are obligated to advise the Government of changes in proposed key personnel staffing, even after submission of proposals.
2.0 VOLUME 2: PAST PERFORMANCE
2.1 General
Sources of past performance evaluation information include information provided by the Offeror in response to the solicitation, information obtained from questionnaires, and any other sources available to the Government, to include, but not limited to, the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS), Federal Awardee
Performance and Integrity Information Systems, Electronic Subcontract Reporting System, or other databases; the
Defense Contract Management Agency; and interviews with Program Managers, Contracting Officers, and Fee
Determining Officials.
The Offeror shall complete the Past Performance Contract Data, Attachment P3, for each past performance reference performed within five years of the solicitation release date. The Offeror shall submit no more than five Past
Performance Information Forms as the Prime Contractor, no more than two forms for each principal subcontractor, and/or no more than two forms for each JV team member. The Offeror shall submit written consent from its principal subcontractor(s) and JV team member(s) that will allow the Government to coordinate any past performance issues directly with the Offeror. If the Offeror does not submit the written consent, the Government will address any past performance issues directly with the principal subcontractor or JV Team member and the
Offeror will forfeit the opportunity to participate in any related discussions. Consequently, for any principal subcontractor and JV team member that does not provide the written consent, the Offeror shall provide the name, address, phone number, and email address with whom the Government may address any past performance issues.
The Offeror shall provide a narrative on each Past Performance Information form in the “Contract Effort
Description” area that clearly describes how each contract reference has relevant work effort that matches the relevancy definitions specified in Section M of the solicitation. Additionally, the Offeror shall provide one electronic copy of the Statement of Work/Performance Work Statement for each contract reference as Annex 1 to this Past
Performance Volume.
The primary source of past performance information will be PPIRS. If a Contractor Performance Assessment
Report (CPAR) exists for multiple years for the same contract/order, all periods of performance within the recency period specified above, for that contract/order, will be used for evaluation. In the event a CPAR does not exist for a past performance reference, the Offeror shall submit a Contractor Performance Assessment Questionnaire (CPAQ), Attachment P5, to the Program Manager who is the Assessing Official. The Offeror shall include instructions for the Program Manager to send completed questionnaires within two weeks of its receipt via e-mail to Allison M.
Kohut Contract Specialist, at Email: allison.kohut@navy.mil. thereby allowing the customer approximately two weeks to complete their response. All CPAQs should be received by the Government concurrently with the
Offeror’s proposal submission.
3.0 VOLUME 3: COST/PRICE PROPOSAL
The offeror shall provide the following information:
3.1 Volume Content:
This Volume shall contain the Contract Compliance information specified below as follows:
(a) Signed SF33 for basic solicitation and acknowledgment of each amendment, including completion of any RFP clause or provision that requires a fill-in or response. Signed Representations, Certifications, and
Acknowledgements and/or System for Award Management (SAM). Guarantee the length of proposal validity for at least [120] days after proposal submission.
(b) This Volume shall also contain a copy of Section B with the Contract Line Item (CLIN) and Sub-CLIN Unit
Prices and, for evaluation purposes, the Total Prices filled in using the estimated quantities value in the solicitation and the instructions below. Section B prices shall be provided separately in one digital data copy in MS Office 2010
Excel format on CD-ROM media. Within all Excel spreadsheets, the Offeror shall use formulas and functions to the maximum extent possible and avoid using output type “value only” cells. If links are utilized, supply those referenced files. Spreadsheets shall not be protected.
(c) All cost/price and cost/price supporting information shall be contained in Section B and the cost/price proposal.
No price or pricing information shall be included in any other technical volume including cover letters. Offerors are responsible for submitting sufficient information to enable the Government to fully evaluate their cost/price proposal.
3.2 Ground Rules and Assumptions:
(a) As this is a competitive acquisition with adequate price competition anticipated, certified cost or pricing data in accordance with FAR 15.403-1 is not required. However, in the event that adequate price competition does not exist after receipt of proposals, the Government reserves the right to request additional cost or pricing data as necessary from both the Offeror and subcontractors. Further, the Offeror may be required to provide a Certificate of Current
Cost or Pricing Data prior to award, pursuant to FAR 15.406-2.
(b) The Offeror shall provide sufficient information to support its cost/price as well as an explanation of all ground rules and assumptions that affect the cost/price estimates.
(c) If subcontractors are proposed, they shall provide the same information required for the prime contractor, unless otherwise noted below.
3.3 Cost/Price Information:
Offerors shall submit their fully completed cost/price proposal utilizing the Cost Summary Spreadsheet (Attachment
P6 Prime and Subcontractor ). The spreadsheet shall be formatted on letter size (8.5 X 11) paper and shall be unprotected and unlocked, with formulae intact to show mathematical operations. The Offeror shall use the CLIN
Summary tab to breakout total proposed costs by CLIN.
Complete Attachment P7 and P8, (Fully Burdened Labor Rates and Fully Burden Hourly Overtime Labor Rates), detailing the fully burdened labor rates for all prime contractors and their subcontractor personnel. Fully burdened labor rates are defined as direct labor rates plus all applicable burdens, to include indirect rates, fee, and subcontractor pass-through costs where applicable. For subcontractor labor, the fully burdened labor rates shall be inclusive of any pass-through charges (e.g., subcontractor handling, fixed fee on subcontractor labor, etc.) applied by the prime contractor. Proposed fully burdened labor costs may be subject to the NAVAIR labor tripwire identified in Section M. Offerors that propose a fully burdened per employee labor cost exceeding the labor tripwire shall provide rationale in their cost proposal narrative section that justifies the reasonableness of the tripwire cost for the applicable employees.
(a) The Government is not soliciting any investments. However, in order for the Government to properly assess a proposed cost/price that appears low due to a corporate decision to absorb costs, e.g., lower than usual burdens or rates, the Offeror shall fully identify and explain any such investments.
(b) Direct/Indirect Rates: The Offeror shall submit Forward Pricing Rate Agreements (FPRAs), Collective
Bargaining Agreements (CBAs), and Area Wage Determinations (AWDs) as applicable for all proposed personnel.
The Offeror shall identify whether the labor rates proposed are FPRAs, CBAs, AWDs, ACO/DCAA recommended rates (FPRRs), or Offeror proposed rates (FPRPs). The Offeror shall provide Defense Contract Audit Agency
(DCAA) Information/Payroll Verification information as follows: A DCAA point of contact, with a current e-mail address, must be provided for the prime and each subcontractor. The Offeror and proposed subcontractors shall provide the most current DCAA Provisional Billing Rate Approval Letter, DCAA Final Billing Rate Approval
Letter, and/or DCAA Forward Pricing Rate Agreement recommendation, payroll verification for currently employed proposed personnel, and any other information necessary to substantiate the rates proposed. Payroll verification shall consist of a form containing the title, direct labor rate, and a signed certification by an authorized representative of the company that the information contained in the form is correct. For key personnel contingent hires, the offeror shall provide contingent offer letters outlining salary information for contingent hire employees.
For any prospective hires for non-key personnel, provide information to substantiate the rates proposed. All contingent hires shall have a letter of intent submitted under the Cost Volume. The letter of intent is a separate written agreement signed by the potential employee(s) to work for the Offeror effective at contract award. Any proposed consultants shall have a consultant agreement substantiating the rates proposed. If a composite rate or other pricing methodology (e.g. cost estimating relationships) is utilized, the Offeror shall demonstrate how those rates were developed. Subcontractors and team members shall provide this information either separately or included in the Offeror’s submission of this document.
The following definition applies:
- A “contingent hire” is an individual who has committed, under a signed letter of intent, inclusive of salary information, to being employed by the Offeror if the Offeror is awarded the contract.
- A “prospective hire” is an individual that the offeror has committed to hiring if the offeror is awarded the task order whose identity may not be known until after contract award.
If any of the rates utilized by the Offeror or any subcontractors differ from the DCAA information and/or payroll verification, a justification shall be provided for the difference. If DCAA has not reviewed the rate information for an Offeror or one of its subcontractors, the Offeror must submit a detailed justification of the proposed direct and indirect rates. The Offeror shall also provide documentation verifying that it has a DCMA approved Accounting
System in accordance with DFARS clause 252.242-7006, or state that it’s Accounting System has not been approved by DCMA. Offerors shall provide the last three (3) years of actual indirect information. The Government may compare a prospective Offeror’s labor category rate to the average labor rate from industry.
(c) Except for FFP type of CLINs (e.g., CPFF, CPIF, or CPAF) under the solicitation, the Offeror shall fully disclose the buildup of cost/price of each CLIN.
(d) When completing the Cost Summary Spreadsheet (Attachment P6), the Offeror shall not utilize any fully burdened hourly rates when pricing the labor of its employees.
(e) Offeror's labor classifications should cross-reference to Department of Labor (DOL) wage determination classifications as much as possible.
This solicitation is, and the resulting contract will be, subject to the Service Contract Act of 1965, as amended, and to FAR clause 52.222-41, contained in Section I of this solicitation. Offerors shall propose employee’s wages in accordance with the attached Wage Determination. As part of the cost/price proposal, the Offeror shall furnish the names of the proposed labor categories and the corresponding labor categories from the attached Wage
Determination as well as documentation of compliance with the minimum monetary wages and fringe benefits for service employees as specified in the Wage Determination (provided as an attachment in Section J of this solicitation). Offerors are required to submit a total compensation plan setting forth salaries and fringe benefits proposed for employees (including temporary and part time employees) who will work under the contract and are subject to the Act, and explain how the compensation plan complies with the Service Contract Act. Offerors are reminded that in accordance with FAR clause 52.222-43, proposals shall not include any allowance for any contingency to cover increased costs for which adjustment is provided under this clause.
If the Offeror’s proposed employees are under a collective bargaining agreement, the Offeror shall provide a copy of the agreement.
This requirement is being set-aside for the small business. Provide a breakout to demonstrate how the prime contractor will perform at least 50% of the cost of the contract incurred for personnel with its own employees for each period of performance in accordance with FAR clause 52.219-14. Cost of contract incurred for personnel includes direct labor cost, overhead that has only direct labor as its base, and the small business’s General and
Administrative (G&A) rate multiplied by the labor cost.
3.4 Total Professional Compensation Plan:
The Offeror shall provide a Total Compensation Plan in accordance with FAR 52.222-46 for each proposed professional employee. The Plan shall include, but not limited to, the following items:
(1) The proposed direct labor rate for each professional employee proposed;
(2) The total cost of the proposed fringe benefits package for each professional employee proposed, including:
(a) list and brief summary of the benefits that make up the fringe package (e.g. vacation time, sick leave, stock, incentive plans, family leave, life insurance, severance pay, bonus plans, health insurance, holidays, location allowance, retirement benefits); and
(b) an itemization of the benefits that require employee contributions, and the amount of that contribution as a percentage of the cost of the particular benefit; and
(3) Data, such as recognized national and regional compensation surveys and studies of professional, public and private organizations, used by the Offeror in establishing the total compensation structure.
3.5 Government Furnished Information:
3.5.1 Other Direct Costs (ODCs)
3.5.1.1 The Government's estimate for ODCs for the prime and all subcontract efforts, unburdened is listed below:
Option Travel
(CLIN 0007)
Material
(CLIN 0013)
Total
$3,750,000 $3,750,000 $7,500,000
Year 1 $750,000 $750,000 $1,500,000
Year 2 $750,000 $750,000 $1,500,000
Year 3 $750,000 $750,000 $1,500,000
Year 4 $750,000 $750,000 $1,500,000
Year 5 $750,000 $750,000 $1,500,000
The Offeror shall propose the cost estimates provided above for ODC CLINs. If it is the Offeror’s accounting practice to apply (and invoice for) burdens with regards to ODCs, then the Offeror shall propose the ODC amount plus the addition of the applicable burdens. (NO FEE SHALL BE APPLIED TO ODCs).
3.5.1.2 Offerors shall utilize the Not-to-Exceed (NTE) amounts provided by the Government for ODC CLINs in their Cost Volume and P6 Attachments. If the Offeror’ s accounting practice is to apply (and invoice for) burdens on top of ODC amounts, the contractor should propose the NTE ODC amount as shown above plus the addition of the applicable burdens, making it clear which burdens are applied to the ODC line item. Sections B and G of the resultant contract will be annotated accordingly for billing and payment information.
3.5.2 Labor Hours
The Government's estimate is 854,400 hours for the entire work effort. A work-year is defined as 1920 hours exclusive of holidays and leave. For purposes of evaluation, Offerors shall propose the labor hours for each labor category per year as shown in the tables below. The labor categories and hours per year shown in the table below entitled "Estimated CPFF Labor Hours" shall be used by the Government to formulate the Offeror’ s proposed price for the CPFF labor CLINs in Section B of the solicitation.
An asterisk (*) denotes Key Personnel.
Labor Category SCA Year I Year II Year
III
Year
IV
Year V Total
Hours
Program Manager, Sr.*(Pax River, offsite) 1920 1920 1920 1920 1920 9600
Engineer, Sr.*(Pax River, onsite) 11520 11520 11520 11520 11520 57600
Engineer, Sr.(Pax River, offsite) 7680 7680 7680 7680 7680 38400
Engineer, Sr. (China Lake, onsite) 1920 1920 1920 1920 1920 9600
Engineer, Sr.( Pax River, onsite) 13440 13440 13440 13440 13440 67200
Engineer, Journeyman * (Pax River, onsite) 5760 5760 5760 5760 5760 28800
Engineer, Journeyman (Pax River, onsite) 1920 1920 1920 1920 1920 9600
Engineer, Journeyman (Pax River, offsite) 1920 1920 1920 1920 1920 9600
Engineer, Jr. (Pax River, onsite) 5760 5760 5760 5760 5760 28800
Engineer, Jr. (Pax River, offsite) 1920 1920 1920 1920 1920 9600
Engineering Technician, VI* (Pax River, onsite) 30086 1920 1920 1920 1920 1920 9600
Engineering Technician, VI (Pax River, onsite) 30086 13440 13440 13440 13440 13440 67200
Engineering Technician, VI (Pax River, offsite) 30086 11520 11520 11520 11520 11520 57600
Engineering Technician, VI (Point Mugu, onsite) 30086 1920 1920 1920 1920 1920 9600
Engineering Technician, IV (Pax River, onsite) 30084 7680 7680 7680 7680 7680 38400
Engineering Technician, IV (Pax River, offsite) 30084 1920 1920 1920 1920 1920 9600
Engineering Technician, II (Pax River, onsite) 30082 21120 21120 21120 21120 21120 105600
Engineering Technician, II (Pax River, offsite) 30082 7680 7680 7680 7680 7680 38400
Systems Analyst, Sr.*(Pax River, onsite) 1920 1920 1920 1920 1920 9600
Systems Analyst, Sr. (Pax River, onsite) 9600 9600 9600 9600 9600 48000
Systems Analyst, Sr. (Pax River, offsite) 1920 1920 1920 1920 1920 9600
Systems Analyst, Journeyman (Pax River, onsite) 11520 11520 11520 11520 11520 57600
Systems Analyst, Journeyman (Pax River, offsite) 3840 3840 3840 3840 3840 19200
Systems Analyst, Jr. (Pax River, onsite) 1920 1920 1920 1920 1920 9600
Systems Analyst, Jr. (Pax River, offsite) 1920 1920 1920 1920 1920 9600
Systems Analyst, Jr. (Point Mugu, onsite) 1920 1920 1920 1920 1920 9600
Systems Analyst, Jr. (China Lake, onsite) 1920 1920 1920 1920 1920 9600
Program Analyst, Journeyman (Pax River, onsite) 7680 7680 7680 7680 7680 38400
Program Analyst, Journeyman (Pax River, offsite) 3840 3840 3840 3840 3840 19200
Administrative Assistant (Pax River, onsite) 01020 1920 1920 1920 1920 1920 9600
TOTAL 170880 170880 170880 170880 170880 854400
3.5.3 Incumbent Information
(a) The incumbent Contractor is: J.F. Taylor, Inc.
21610 South Essex Drive
Lexington Park, MD 20653
3.5.4 Place of Performance
The place of performance for this contract is primarily in Patuxent River, MD (Government site: 72%; Contractor
Site: 28% = 96%), Point Mugu, CA (Government Site: 2%), and China Lake, CA ( Government Site: 2%). This requirement is subject to change during execution. Currently, approximately 74% of contractor personnel performing under the contract for this requirement work in Government provided spaces.
(End of Summary of Changes)
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .