Exhibit A - CDRL A008 -Supplemental Provisioning Technical Documentation.xlsx

XLSX spreadsheet 729 KB Posted Aug 15, 2018

Attached to: Battle Force Tactical Network (BFTN) Follow On
Solicitation number: N00039-18-R-0058
Issued by: Department of the Navy Information Warfare Systems Command

About this file

Written by GovTribe AI · Dec 30, 2023

This document summarizes a solicitation for the Battle Force Tactical Network (BFTN) Follow On contract. The solicitation seeks proposals to develop, deliver, install, integrate, test, and provide product support for BFTN systems and equipment. Key details include that the solicitation number is N00039-18-R-0058, with an initial proposal due date of 20 August 2018. The solicitation involves developing cable drawings, run sheets, and bills of materials to build to specification. The Navy will host an industry day on 7 March 2018 to discuss requirements and answer questions. Interested offerors must request technical data packages and sign a non-disclosure agreement by 2 March 2018 to attend. The contract will involve past performance evaluations of prime and major subcontractors.

View the file

Other files

File	Type	Posted
Q&A Draft RFP 15 June 2018.pdf	PDF	Aug 15, 2018
NDA BFTN form.doc	DOC document	Aug 15, 2018
Attachment 4 - DoD Contract Security Classification Specification (DD254).pdf	PDF	Aug 15, 2018
Attachment 2 BFTN SOW 19 June 2018.pdf	PDF	Aug 15, 2018
Q&A RFP 27 June 2018.pdf	PDF	Aug 15, 2018
Exhibit A BFTN DD1423 CDRLs.pdf	PDF	Aug 15, 2018
N00039-18-R-0058 BFTN FINAL RFP.pdf	PDF	Aug 15, 2018
RFP Amendment 0003 15 August 2018.pdf	PDF	Aug 15, 2018
RFP Amendment 0002 25 July 2018.pdf	PDF	Aug 15, 2018
Q&A RFP 10 July 2018.pdf	PDF	Aug 15, 2018
Attachment 8 - Past Performance Questionaire_Survey.pdf	PDF	Aug 15, 2018
N00039-18-R-0058 BFTN RFP Amendment 0001.pdf	PDF	Aug 15, 2018
Attachment 9 - Relevant Experience Form.pdf	PDF	Aug 15, 2018
BFTN Industry Day 3.6.18_FINAL_PO.pdf	PDF	Aug 15, 2018
Exhibit A - CDRL A023 - GFP Status Report.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Aug 15, 2018
QA Industry Day 7 March 2018.pdf	PDF	Aug 15, 2018
QA Draft RFP 19 April 2018.pdf	PDF	Aug 15, 2018

Show all 17

On GovTribe

Work with this file

Download the original file
Contacts named in this file
Similar government files
Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

COVER

NAVAL SEA LOGISTICS CENTER
(NAVSEALOCEN or NSLC)
	TECHNICAL SUPPORT ACTIVITY (TSA)
	for
	ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT
	5450 CARLISLE PIKE - BLDG 307
	P. O. Box 2060
	MECHANICSBURG, PA 17055-0795
	FACSIMILE: (717) 605-2669

	POINTS OF CONTACT
ELLIOTT E. MARTIN, III (Skip); TEAM LEADER (717) 605-3259, DSN (430)
	Work Station, WS-235 / Bay H12
	email: elliott.martin@navy.mil
	PAMMA PERENY (717) 605-2080, DSN (430)
	Work Station, WS-226 / Bay F13
	email: pamma.pereny@navy.mil

INTRO

INTRODUCTION

As an authorized Technical Support Activity (TSA) for electronic equipment, we will validate your input and make recommendations as to the requirements while ensuring consistency with the maintenance philosophy established for your equipment and as you have identified in the "HEADER" tab per the section marked, "MAINTENANCE PHILOSOPHY FOR THIS PROVISIONING EFFORT" . Once your input is validated, we will ensure that your information is appropriately loaded into ICAPS, and subsequently released to NAVSUP for further processing. If you would like to discuss our SPAWAR TSA Task with the sponsor, the SPAWAR Point of Contact is:

Barbara Ayala Technical Director for Supply Chain Management SPAWAR Code 43000 4301 Pacific Highway San Diego, CA 92110-3127 barbara.ayala@navy.mil Commercial (619) 221-4511

DSN 553-4511

This tool is intended to assist the prime contractor or their designated subcontractor in providing the necessary Engineering Data for Provisioning (EDFP) for their equipment. The prime contractor is normally required by contract to provide the EDFP along with their supporting documentation of their equipment and translate those prescribed and salient provisioning characteristics into a capatible file that will be loaded into the government computer system called the Interacactive Computer Aided Provisioning System (ICAPS).

The data elements described herewith are the minimum requirements to establish a valid record in ICAPS. Each data element has been assigned a Data Product Dictionary (DPD) number and must be consistent with their descriptions for Logistics Management Information (LMI) per MIL-PRF-49506 titiled Performance Specification for Logistics Management Information. Those special ICAPS data elements, which are annotated with a prefix of "S" and are not listed in MIL-PRF-49506, have been assigned a tab for amplified description. Refer to the "DATA GUIDE" tab for a comprehensive listing of all data elements and their corresponding LMI DPD number.

The Naval Sea Logistics Center has developed this Microsoft (MS) Excel spreadsheet that will assist the prime contractor with this data submission in a less restrictive manner and hopefully, in a data environment that should be more familiar and business-friendly to the prime contractor. You will note the "GREEN DOT" on the top menu bar of this screen. It is a MS Excel macro that automatically translates the data provided in the "NSLC INPUT FILE" tab into a ".PCS" formated text file. This allows us to directly transfer the results into ICAPS. The objective in this data exchange is to create an Allowance Parts List (APL) document for each and every subassembly of your system or equipment.

Along with the appropriate documentation, there are only two tabs that are highlighted in red and these two tabs are your deliverable. And these are the only tabs that require your input. The "HEADER" tab is for general information and establishes a necessary baseline for further communication. The "WORKSHEET" tab is where you will load all of your EDFP. It is conceivable to load your entire equipment into a single spreadsheet. At some point, this becomes impractical. We highly recommend that you logically subdivide your equipment into their lowest level of subassemblies and submit a separate file for each subassembly; i.e. a parts breakdown scheme. Our counterpart at NAVSUP will assign a Provisioning Contract Control Number (PCCN) for each subassembly and possibly a pre-assigned APL number as well.

A "DATA-GUIDE" tab is included to provide a "quick and simple" explanation of the data elements requested in the worksheet. There is also a specific colored tab for each and every data element found in the worksheet and provides an amplified explanation for each data element. These colored tabs are the ICAPS help screens that are consistent with the NAVSUP Data Element Dictionary. The worksheet has be saturated with hyperlinks to improve navigation between the worksheet and the help screens. The "NSLC INPUT FILE" tab is our tool, which tailors the formatting for ICAPS input, and this tab has been password protected. And finally, a sample has been provided to show you what a final product may look like.

** CAUTION CAUTION CAUTION CAUTION CAUTION CAUTION CAUTION CAUTION CAUTION **

If you're not familiar with hyperlinks, be aware that if you save this file using a different filename, the hyperlinks will become disabled. As such, we highly recommend that you save this file using the same filename. Once you have finished with the worksheet or if you feel you don't need the help screens, feel free to rename you file.

INTRODUCTION (continued)

The current version of this file has been designed to handle up to 80 items; 40 items (PLISNs A001 thru A040) in the "WORKSHEET" tab and 40 more items (PLISNs A041 thru A080) in the "WORKSHEET (2)" tab. Minimally, your data submission should include the "HEADER" and the "WORKSHEET" tab along with the "WORKSHEET (2)" tab, if there are more than 40 items. Obviously, if you have more than 80 items, you can add "WORKSHEET (3)", "WORKSHEET (4)", etc. by copying and inserting another worksheet tab while renumbering the PLISNs accordingly. Each worksheet is printable on tabloid (11" x 17") size of paper (ANSI size "B"). You are reminded to insert the appropriate header prior to printing the worksheet. For our convenience, we insist that the "NSLC INPUT FILE" tab be included with your submission to failitate our processing effort.

** DOCUMENTATION (DRAWINGS) ARE ALSO CONSIDERED A MANDATORY DELIVERABLE **

We will require a complete set of documentation supporting each line item in the spreadsheet. In the case where an item has been identified "TO BE STOCKED" as indicated by a "P" in the first position of the SM&R code, a detailed Original Equipment Manufaturer (OEM) documentation is required to satisfy the NIIN assignment by the Defense Logistics Agency; i.e. there must be positive identification of the CAGE an PN assignment to all stock numbered items and supported by objective evidence. No documentation is required for those items that have been already assigned to an appropriate and existing NIIN in the Supply System.

Please ensure that the documentation has a title block, which positively identifies the "CAGE and PART NUMBER" of the OEM. It is highly recommended that the name and address of the OEM be included in the title block for further clarification. The document must have a unique document number and revision number, letter or date. We requst that each page of the supporting documentation be annotated with your assigned PLISN identification to facilitate our correlation to the worksheet. Also ensure that the document is approved by an authorized agent of the OEM. Consistent with DoD Directive 5230.24 of Aug 23, 2012, each drawing must have an assigned distribution statement. Reproductive legibility, the lack of approval or the lack of a distribution statement are rejectable attributes for the documentaion submitted. If the item is a military critical technology, the appropriate export control statement and destruction notice must appear on each document. The acquisiion activity/command is responsible to identify any required special markings, which includes but not limited to "U-NNPI", "NNPI", "NOFORN", "CLASSIFIED", "UNCLASSIFED", "SECRET", "LEVEL 1", or "SUBSAFE", etc. on the document. Remember, special handling and transittal is required for any document with these markings other than "UNCLASSIFED". As part of the TSA responsibilities, each and every document will be subsequently loaded and maintained in the Naval Ships Engineering Drawing Repository (NSEDR).

Obviously an OEM part and/or assembly drawing is the preferred documentation. Alternate documentation includes, but not limited to photographs, catalog cuts, technical manual excerpts, web pages, schematics, provisioning parts lists, installation drawings, etc. The Naval Repository is currently being updated and expanded to include these types of alternative documentation. We will keep you informed if and when this updated capability becomes available.

From time-to-time, we have been asked about those items that do not have an available drawing or alternative documentation from the OEM and the OEM has absolutely no intension of providing any documented evidence. This is especially true of COTS (Commercial-Off-The-Shelf) type of parts. Unfortunately, that does not exonerate the prime contractor of the equipment from the requirement to provide documentation. As such and only as a last resort, we recommend that the prime contractor make a photograph of the item and place the same on their standard drawing format. Note that this document must still identify the CAGE and PART NUMBER of the OEM as the primary identification for NIIN assignment. It should be clearly understood that when the prime contractor assigns their own PART NUMBER to a part that is manufactured by others, the prime's part number is considered a seconday and alternate identification (ALTCAGE1, ALTPN1, ALTRNVC1, and ALTRNCC1).

Recently, ICAPS has issued new and updated requirments. The PCCN has been restricted to only six (6) characters. The input of this data element in the "HEADER" tab has been restricted consistent with this requirement. Additionally, ICAPS requires the identification of at least one user of the sub-assembly or equipment. A new section to the "HEADER" tab has been added and it is titled "ICAPS MINIMUM APPLICATION IDENTIFICATION - ONE HULL OR SITE". The PCCN cannot be successfully validated until a single application is placed against the record.

We appreciate your cooperation in this matter and look forward to working with you to accomplish the provisioning task. Feel free to recommend any changes to this tool as we strive to provide the very best support for our sailors.

FILE &F Page &P of &N 12/10/2015

DLA WHITE PAPER

SUMMARY SHEET

PROBLEM STATEMENT:

DLA decision to enforce longstanding policy requiring all NSNs to reflect the CAGE assigned to the Design Control Authority (DCA) or Manufacturer and the impacts on NSN assignment and provisioning and engineering systems, policies and procedures.

ISSUES:

- Omission of the required information on provisioning deliverables

- Inability to provide this information due to issues with manufacturer/DCA

- Current enforcement for DLA items resulting in increase in SSR rejects

- Impact on mechanized processes employed by Navy for requesting new Navy retained NSNs

- Impacts on resources and multiple written policies and procedures

- Massive clean-up effort

SUMMARY:

The enforcement of this policy can have serious implications on our ability to assign NSNs for newly provisioned items. At a minimum it will increase the timeframe for obtaining an NSN and in some cases, requests for NSN assignments may be disapproved due to lack of required information

Proposals for alleviating these problems are contained in the attached paper; however, the most important take-away is to ensure that information on the DCA/manufacturer is provided with the actual request for NSN.

DOD Policy Design Control Authority Reference Numbers

BACKGROUND

The Federal Cataloging Committee (FCC) is the governing body overseeing development of policies, procedures and systems used to support the uniform Federal Catalog System (FCS) with its membership composed of representatives from all military services and federal agencies. In 2012 the FCC was briefed by DLA (Defense Logistics Agency) headquarters regarding a legal challenge from several distributors on a company’s registration as sole source on an item. The distributor, who used their own part number and CAGE (Commercial and Government Entity) for their items, refused to reveal their manufacturing sources when asks, citing that this information was considered proprietary. Upon further investigation it was revealed that there are many items resident in the FCS reflecting only non-manufacturing sources and providing no information as to who owns or controls the design specifications for those items.

In response to this briefing the FCC chartered the Reference Number Working Group (RNWG) to investigate this issue and its ramifications as well as research the authorized policies and procedures utilized in the recordation of CAGE and reference number information in the FLIS TIR (Federal Logistics Information System Total Item Record). In May 2012 the RNWG formally reported their findings identifying the fact that lack of proper design information not only hindered fair and open competition but precluded the development of conformance specifications and tests leading to an inability to properly verify suspicious counterfeit material, identify unapproved product substitutions or even verify origin of manufacturing. Furthermore, while the team proposed the development of additional codes for registration of reference numbers, which were later deemed too costly for implementation by FCC members, the RNWG determined that there was no need for revision to existing cataloging policy, rather the goal of improving the CAGE/reference number recordation in the FLIS TIR could be accomplished by simple enforcement of existing policy.

This paper has been developed and distributed to engineering and provisioning professionals at NAVSEA, NAVAIR and the WSS in an effort to brief all interested parties on the recent decision to fully enforce this policy. Additionally, this paper details all issues impeding the Navy’s full compliance, documents steps taken to date to resolve these issues, identifies outstanding concerns and finally, is meant to solicit all comments and concerns from the Navy’s engineering and provisioning communities.

GENERAL DISCUSSION

DOD policy, detailed in the FLIS Procedures Manual (DOD 4100.39, Vol. 1 Section 1.1.7) requires every item of supply to reflect one CAGE and reference number that represents the Design Control Authority (DCA) or manufacturer of that item. This policy is further bolstered by the information promulgated in GEIA-STD-0007 Appendix A, which defines the CAGE requirements for NSNs (National Stock Numbers) to be that of the design control activity or actual manufacturer of an item.

Effective June 2013 DLA catalogers have been directed to review each request for a new DLA stock number to ensure compliance with this policy. Assignment of an NSN to an item where the primary source is not the DCA/manufacturer WILL NOT be authorized; however, if the request for NSN contains both the CAGE/reference number for the DCA/manufacturer and the CAGE/reference number for one or more distributors, DLA/LIS (DLA/Defense Logistics Information Services) catalogers have been directed to load the former as the primary reference with the latter being coded as a secondary reference(s). Exceptions to this policy are permitted when the design of an item is governed by a Government Specification or Standard, in which case reference to the applicable Specification or Standard will be recorded in the FLIS TIR as the primary reference.

Additionally, we have been informed that the DLA/LIS catalogers will soon be screening requests for new Navy retained NSNs for compliance with this policy as well as identifying all items currently resident in the FCS without the mandated DCA or manufacturer’s information with the intention of initiating a massive clean- up effort.

ISSUES

Receipt of provisioning deliverables without the required design control authority references.

Quite often provisioning deliverables do not reflect the CAGE and reference number of the CDA or manufacturer and while personnel at DLA/LIS, who are the authorized cataloging agents for all services/agencies, will be required to review each NSN assignment request to ensure compliance with this policy, they possess limited expertise for resolving discrepancies themselves. If not forwarded on the original request, while DLA/LIS catalogers will attempt to identify the necessary information wherever possible, should their efforts prove unsuccessful; the request for NSN assignment will be returned to the WSS unprocessed. These NSN assignment request rejects will then require extensive research by WSS personnel and quite possibly, require information that can only be obtained through contact with the engineers or the OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer). In either case, conducting this research is expected to negatively impact on the timeframes associated with NSN assignment which could ultimately jeopardize supply support for the fielded weapons systems.

In an effort to provide the engineering community with all relevant information during LSA (Logistics Support Analysis) product development, a request has been made to DLA/LIS to investigate the enhancement of formal provisioning screening products to include both the Type and Status codes for every CAGE submitted for screening. The CAGE Status defines if the company is considered an active company and in good standing with the government while the CAGE Type defines whether or not that company is recorded as a manufacturing or non-manufacturing entity. Definitions of these codes can be found in DOD 4100.39, Vol. 10, Tables 19 and 90 respectively. In the interim our best resolution is to submit a separate listing of every CAGE submitted within a provisioning package very early in the LSA development phase to DLA/LIS requesting that an EXCEL spreadsheet be developed and returned to the NAVY reflecting both the type and status for all submitted CAGEs. This should then be forwarded to the entity responsible for development of LSA products with guidance on how this information should be used.

Additionally, an informal inquiry has been submitted to Naval Sea Logistics Center, Central Design Agency for ICAPS (Integrated Computer Aided Provisioning System), requesting details on system requirements necessary to provide the ESA (Engineering Support Activity) visibility of this additional data, and should this initiative be approved and deployed, future plans include development and utilization of enhanced edit and validation logic to be applied to each new item loaded at time of provisioning to preclude creation and submission of an NSN request not complying with this policy.

Still to be determined are the impacts on formal documents, such as written guidelines governing product development (PSOWs/CDRLs (Provisioning Statement of Work/Contract Data Requirements Listing)), and acceptance review procedures and practices as well as the impacts on those DCN (Design Change Notice), ECP (Engineering Change Proposal) and provisioning products developed by OEMs, shipyards and other entities outside of ICAPS.

Design Control Authority refuses to do business with government and/or does not have an assigned CAGE code and refuses to formally request a CAGE.

The DLA/LIS catalogers have been instructed to assign an NSN in these instances provided the information regarding the company retaining design authority can be identified and pertinent information about this company, such as name, address and phone number, can be included for that newly assigned NSN in the characteristics segment of the FLIS TIR. If this information is not received at time of request, DLA/LIS catalogers will perform limited research to attempt to identify this information; however, if they are unsuccessful, our request for NSN assignment will be rejected and sent back to the WSS. The important point here is that in accordance with this policy an NSN assignment will not be approved unless and until this information is provided to DLA/LIS, pointing to the importance of ensuring this data is identified up front and included in all provisioning deliverables.

Current impacts on the Supply Support Request process

Requests for DLA/GSA (General Supply Agency) managed NSNs are submitted through generation and submission of a Supply Support Request (SSR) with review of rejection statistics showing an increase attributable to noncompliance with this policy. While the volume of rejects to date are relatively small, approximately 2% of all SSRs submitted between 1 June and 31 July, the additional time required for each cataloger to research and determine the design authority or manufacturer when not submitted with the original SSR, coupled with the subsequent time required by WSS and engineering personnel should the DLA/LIS efforts prove unsuccessful, will add significant time to an already lengthy process and could jeopardize our ability to fully support a fielded weapons system at time of MSD (Material Support Date). Not only will this negatively impact our repair processes but can also show itself in the form of an increase in the number of requisitions received for part numbers and NICNs (Navy Identification Control Numbers) received by the WSS as well as an unplanned increase in the demand for the next higher assembly when the repair parts are unavailable.

It is hoped that by providing the type and status of every CAGE contained in a provisioning deliverable during initial provisioning screening, the research required to ensure compliance with this policy can be accomplished upfront, prior to package delivery to the cognizant WSS, thereby limiting any negative impacts on completion of provisioning packages and decreasing the amount of touch points and rework associated with reject processing.

Impacts on requests for NSNs for new Navy items

Because DLA has directed that ALL requests for NSN assignments be reviewed for compliance with this policy, this will also impact on those requests submitted for NSN assignment for new Navy retained items of supply. The development and employment of mechanized edits and validations to be applied against the actual transactions submitted to FLIS for NSN assignment are not yet in place; however, work is underway at DLA/LIS to identify this validation logic with plans to deploy scheduled for 2016. While on the surface this might seem like ‘good news’, because of the systemic methods employed when requesting NSNs for new Navy managed material, the enforcement of this policy before the DLA/LIS mechanized tools are in place presents a unique problem for the Navy.

Prior to transferring the cataloging functions to DLA/LIS in February 2000, the Navy implemented several reengineering initiatives to those processes slated for transfer. As it pertains to NSN assignments for Navy retained items of supply, we now employ a mechanized process that, upon identification and loading to file of a new Navy item requiring NSN assignment, the transactions for requesting that NSN are systemically generated and submitted to FLIS for mechanized processing without need for any manual review by a DLA/LIS cataloger. The only time a cataloger sees one of these transactions is if it should be rejected by the system, which happens infrequently; however, in adhering to this mandate without benefit of mechanized edits and validations the only conceivable way the DLA/LIS organization can comply would be to halt the mechanized processes employed by the Navy today, requiring all requests for new Navy NSNs to be manually reviewed. This would take a very efficient process, where today we experience an average 10 day turnaround from files load to NSN assignment, and increase it significantly. While at this point DLA has not indicated how they will be ensuring compliance for requests for new Navy NSNs, it is felt that by implementing some of the changes detailed above we will ensure that provisioning packages received by the WSS for processing include all the required information necessary to preclude rejects and labor intensive, time consuming rework efforts.

Clean-up activities

At present the DLA is compiling statistics on the number of items currently residing in the FCS that do not comply with this policy. Initial estimates are that there are well over 100,000 established items reflecting this data discrepancy with the exact number of items, broken down by managing and using service/agency, to be provided at our September meeting. The sheer volume of items and the anticipated workload coupled with limited resources are of major concern to the WSS. The plan is to perform some initial analysis to determine how our universe of items can be parsed into smaller ‘bundles’. Topics to be discussed include development of logic for use in mechanically correcting some of these errors as well as a methodology for the prioritization of review and corrective actions.

Wherever possible DLA would like us to employ mechanized corrective actions but in doing so, consideration must be given to the impacts on other policies and regulations. Specifically consideration must be given to DLAR 3200.1/NAVSUPINST 4120.30 requiring ESA review and approval on all relevant changes to weapons coded, critical items, as well as the impacts on current cataloging regulations which require PICA (Primary Inventory Control Activity) coordination with, and universal concurrence from, all SICAs (Secondary Inventory Control Activity) prior to the effecting of any change to reference number data.

CONCLUSION

While I apologize for the length and complexity of this paper, the enforcement of this policy and its far reaching implications require a thorough discussion in order to ensure all interested parties are provided with the information necessary to make an informed decision. If deemed necessary a formal meeting or teleconference can be convened to discuss the issues identified in this paper as well as any new concerns. In the interim, questions may be directed to either me or to one of the following individuals:

Prepared by:

Lori Orr

Senior Logistician

Life Cycle Engineering, INC.

Lorr@LCE.COM

267-255-9294

DATA GUIDE

STANDARD DATA ELEMENTS
DPD*	ABBREV	DATA ELEMENT NAME	REMARKS
0870	PCCN

Martin, Elliott E CIV: PROVISIONING CONTRACT

CONTROL

NUMBER	PROVISIONING CONTRACT CONTROL NUMBER	Assigned by NAVSUP. If not known, please conduct NAVSUP for assignment.
	0890	PLISN

Martin, Elliott E CIV: PROVISIONING

LIST

ITEM

SEQUENCE

NUMBER	PROVISIONING LIST ITEM SEQUENCE NUMBER	Line item number of the maintenance significant parts. REMEMBER, this includes a fifth position to annotate "adds" and a sixth position to annotate "deletes" or "modifications" to a previous revision.
	0900	PROV NOM
Martin, Elliott E CIV: PROVISIONING NOMENCLATURE	PROVISIONING NOMENCLATURE	The identifying name assigned by the OEM or Prime Contractor. This name is NOT passed beyond ICAPS and is used for the convenience of the OEM or prime contractor.
	0140	CAGE

Martin, Elliott E CIV: COMMERCIAL

AND

GOVERNMENT ENTITY

CODE	COMMERCIAL AND GOVERNMENT ENTITY	Code assigned to the Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) of the part or assembly. It is NOT necessarily the code assigned to the Prime Contractor.
	1050	PN

Martin, Elliott E CIV: PART

NUMBER	PART NUMBER
(ALSO CALLED REFERENCE NUMBER [RN])	Identification assigned by the Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) of the part or assembly. It is NOT the identification assigned by the prime contractor of the part or assembly.
	1060	RNCC

Martin, Elliott E CIV: REFERENCE

NUMBER

CATEGORY

CODE	REFERENCE NUMBER CATEGORY CODE	Category or relationship of the part number to a National Stock Number
	1070	RNVC

Martin, Elliott E CIV: REFERENCE

NUMBER

VARIATION

CODE	REFERENCE NUMBER VARIATION CODE	Level to which the Manufacturer's part number identifies an item.
	0280	EC

Martin, Elliott E CIV: ESSENTIALITY

CODE	ESSENTIALITY CODE	What is the affect of part failure?
	0930	QPA

Martin, Elliott E CIV: QUANTITY

PER

ASSEMBLY	QUANTITY PER ASSEMBLY	The total number of times the line item is used in the assembly . Note the special rules for entry of multiple reference designators.
	1030	REFDES
Martin, Elliott E CIV: REFERENCE DESIGNATOR	REFERENCE DESIGNATOR	Part breakdown structure assigned by the prime contractor IAW ANSI Y32.16.
	0680	NIIN

Martin, Elliott E CIV: NATIONAL

ITEM IDENTIFICATION

NUMBER	NATIONAL ITEM IDENTIFICATION NUMBER	A nine digit number assigned by FLIS/ DLSC to identify an approved item of supply within the Federal Cataloguing Program.
	0480	NAME

Martin, Elliott E CIV: ITEM

NAME	ITEM NAME	The name IAW established NAVICP guidelines and NOT necessarily the name assigned by the OEM or the prime contractor. This name is passed through ICAPS. (Only 26 characters accepted)
	1470	UI

Martin, Elliott E CIV: UNIT

ISSUE	UNIT OF ISSUE	The determinate amount of quantity established as a standard measurement for issuance of material.
	1500	UI PRICE

Martin, Elliott E CIV: UNIT

ISSUE

PRICE	UNIT OF ISSUE PRICE	The best estimated price per unit of issue for the item, without regard to quantity per unit pack or minimum buy quantity.
	0830	PLT

Martin, Elliott E CIV: PRODUCTION

LEAD

TIME	PRODUCTION LEAD TIME	The time between the placement of a new contract and actual delivery.
	S007	AMC

Martin, Elliott E CIV: ACQUISITION METHOD

CODE	ACQUISITION METHOD CODE	How is the item being procured?
	S008	AMSC

Martin, Elliott E CIV: ACQUISITION METHOD

SUFFIX

CODE	ACQUISITION METHOD SUFFIX CODE	Are there any restrictions to the procurement?
	0230	DMIL
Martin, Elliott E CIV: DEMILITARIZATION CODE	DEMILITARIZATION CODE	Item's demilitarization requirements; Destroy?
	0560	MRRI

Martin, Elliott E CIV: MAINTENANCE REPLACEMENT

RATE

I	MAINTENANCE REPLACEMENT RATE INDICATOR	Annual demand for the item. Also known as Technical or Best Replacement Factor, TRF or BRF, respectively. It is calculated by the equation, " MRRI = YEARLY SERVICE HOURS ÷ MTBF "
	0630	MTBF	MEAN TIME BETWEEN FAILURE	MTBF is used to calculate MRRI. It is the predicted elapsed time between inherent failures of an equipment or system during its operation. It is calculated as the arithmatic mean (average) time between failures in hours.
	1220	SMR

Martin, Elliott E CIV: SOURCE, MAINTENANCE

AND RECOVERABILITY CODE	SOURCE, MAINTENANCE AND RECOVERABILITY	How the Navy intends to supported this item?
	S002	MRU

Martin, Elliott E CIV: MINIMUM

REPLACEMENT

UNITS	MINIMUM REPLACEMENT UNITS	Quantity of the item to be replaced for preventive maintenance purposes?
	0180	PSPC

Martin, Elliott E CIV: PHYSICAL

SECURITY

PILFERAGE

CODE	PHYSICAL SECURITY / PILFERAGE CODE	Does the item or assembly have physical security, sensitivity or pilferage requiements?
	0190	NHCI

Martin, Elliott E CIV: NUCLEAR

HARDNESS

CRITICAL

ITEM	NUCLEAR HARDNESS CRITICAL ITEM	Is the item technically critical by reason of tolerance, fit restrictions, application, nuclear hardness properties or other characteristics?
	0790	PMIC

Martin, Elliott E CIV: PRECIOUS

METALS

INDICATOR

CODE

PRECIOUS METALS INDICATOR CODE Is the item or does the assembly contain precious metals?

SPECIAL DATA ELEMENTS NEEDED FOR ITEMS THAT ARE SMR-CODED "Pxx D x"
DPD*	ABBREV	DATA ELEMENT NAME	REMARKS
S006	DOP1

Martin, Elliott E CIV: DESIGNATED

OVERHAUL

POINT	DESIGNATED OVERHAUL POINT	Who is authorized to overhaul this item?
	S005	RSR

Martin, Elliott E CIV: FAILURE

FACTOR

III

CODE	FAILURE FACTOR III (REPAIR SURVIVAL RATE)	Percentage of reported non-serviceable repairable assets which will, through rework, be returned to a serviceable condition.
	S010	RIP

Martin, Elliott E CIV: REMAIN

PLACE

INDICATOR

CODE	REMAIN IN PLACE INDICATOR	A failed DLR should not, or cannot be removed if a replacement is not immediately available.
	1530	LENGTH
Martin, Elliott E CIV: LENGTH	LENGTH	To the nearest tenth of an inch.
	1530	WIDTH
Martin, Elliott E CIV: WIDTH	WIDTH	To the nearest tenth of an inch.
	1530	HEIGHT
Martin, Elliott E CIV: HEIGHT	HEIGHT	To the nearest tenth of an inch.
	1550	WEIGHT
Martin, Elliott E CIV: WEIGHT	WEIGHT	To the nearest tenth of a pound.

DATA ELEMENTS FOR IDENTIFICATION OF ALTERNATE SOURCES OF SUPPLY
DPD*	ABBREV	DATA ELEMENT NAME	REMARKS
0140	ALTCAGE1	ALTERNATE CAGE NUMBER 1	THIS OPTION IS PROVIDED TO ALLOW IDENTIFICATION OF ALTERNATE SOURCES OF SUPPLY FOR THE SAME ITEM. THE DATA ELEMENT DEFINITION IS THE SAME AS THE PRIMARY DATA ELEMENTS LISTED ABOVE.

(THEY ARE REFERENCED AS ARNs (ALTERNATE REFERENCE NUMBERS)

1050	ALTPN1	ALTERNATE PART NUMBER 1
1060	ALTRNCC1	ALTERNATE RNCC NUMBER 1
1070	ALTRNVC1	ALTERNATE RNVC NUMBER 1
0140	ALTCAGE2	ALTERNATE CAGE NUMBER 2
1050	ALTPN2	ALTERNATE PART NUMBER 2
1060	ALTRNCC2	ALTERNATE RNCC NUMBER 2
1070	ALTRNVC2	ALTERNATE RNVC NUMBER 2

* - DATA PRODUCT DICTIONARY (DPD) NUMBER FOR LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT INFORMATION (LMI) PER MIL-PRF-49506

- MANDATORY FIELDS

- CONDITIONAL FIELDS NECESSARY WHEN ITEM HAS NOT BEEN ASSIGNED A NIIN BY DLA.

- NON-MANDATORY FIELDS BUT HIGHLY RECOMMENDED

- CONDITIONAL FIELDS NECESSARY WHEN TRIGGERED BY A "D" IN POSITION #4 OF THE SM&R CODE

SM&R Code Position 1 = "P"

Mandatory Fields for all Items with or without a NIIN:

(color coded YELLOW)

PLISN, CAGE, Part Number, EC, Qty Per Assembly, Reference Designator, Item Name, Unit of Issue, SM&R, MRU

SM&R Code Position 1 = "P"

Additional Mandatory Fields for items without a NIIN:

(color coded BLUE)

U/I Price, PLT, AMC, AMSC, DMIL, TRF, PSPC, NHCI, and PMIC

SM&R Code Position 1 = "A", "K", "M", or "X"

Mandatory Fields for all Items:

(color coded YELLOW)

PLISN, CAGE, Part Number, EC, Qty Per Assembly, Reference Designator, Unit of Issue, SM&R, MRU

Additional Mandatory Fields for items without a NIIN and an SM&R Position 1 = "P" and SM&R Position 5 of a "D" or "K":

(color coded PURPLE)

DOP, RSR, RIP, Unit Dimensions (Length, Width, Height) and Unit Weight

&28MINI-GUIDE FOR PROVISIONING DATA ELEMENTS

&8FILE: &F.xlsx PAGE &P OF &N REV "0" - 06/21/2013

SMR GUIDE

	NAVY SM&R CODE REFERENCE CHART
NAVSUP INSTRUCTION 4423.29A, PUBLICATION 719 (NSN 0530-LP-011-2960)

		SOURCE - MEANS OF ACQUIRING SUPPORT		MAINTENANCE				RECOVERABILITY		SERVICE OPTION CODE
		2ND POSITION		3RD POSITION		4TH POSITION		5TH POSITION		6TH POSITION
1ST POSITION	P	A	ITEM STOCKED	USE: LOWEST LEVEL		USE: LOWEST LEVEL		DISPOSITION WHEN		ASSIGNED TO SUPPORT
		B	ITEM STOCKED, INSURANCE	AUTHORIZED TO		WITH		UNSERVICABLE OR		ITEMS TO CONVEY
		C	ITEM STOCKED, DETERIORATIVE	REMOVE/REPLACE		CAPABILITY AND		UNECONOMICALLY		SPECIFIC INFORMATION
		D	ITEM SUPPORT, INITIAL ISSUE OF OUTFITTING &	THE ITEM		RESOURCES TO		REPAIRABLE,		TO THE SERVICE'S
			STOCKED ONLY FOR ADDITIONAL INITIAL ISSUE			PERFORM		CONDEMN OR		LOGISTICS
		E	EQUIPMENT SUPPORT, STOCKED FOR INITIAL ISSUE OR			COMPLETE		DISPOSE		COMMUNITY/OPERATING
			OUTFITTING OF SPECIFIED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES			REPAIR ACTION				FORCES
		F	EQUIPMENT SUPPORT, NON-STOCKED, CENTRALLY	O	ORG/UNIT	O	ORG/UNIT	O	ORG/UNIT	1	I-LEVEL
			PROCURED ON DEMAND	2	MINESWEEPER,	2	MINESWEEPER,				1ST DEGREE
		G	ITEM STOCKED FOR SUSTAINED SUPPORT.		YARDCRAFT,		YARDCRAFT,			2	I-LEVEL
			UNECONOMICAL TO PRODUCE AT A LATER TIME		PATROL BOAT,		PATROL BOAT,				2ND DEGREE
		H	ITEM STOCKED, CONTAINS HAZMAT HMIS/MSDS		LCS AFLOAT		LCS AFLOAT			3	I-LEVEL
			REPORTING REQUIRED	3	SUBMARINES	3	SUBMARINES				3RD DEGREE
		R	TERMINAL OR OBSELETE, REPLACED	4	AUX/AMPHIB	4	AUX/AMPHIB			6	COMMERCIAL ITEM,
		Z	TERMINAL OR OBSELETE, NOT REPLACED	5	DESTROYER,	5	DESTROYER,				ORGANICALLY MFR'D
	K	D	ITEM: DEPOT O/H & MAINTENANCE KITS		LCS ASHORE		LCS ASHORE			8	NON-CONSUMABLE;
		F	ITEM: MAINTENANCE KIT, PLACE AT O, F, H, L	6	CRUISER/CARRIER	6	CRUISER/CARRIER				2ND DEGREE ENGINE
		B	ITEM : IN BOTH DEPOT REPAIR & MAINTENANCE KITS	F	I/AFLOAT	F	I/AFLOAT	F	I/AFLOAT		I-LEVEL
	M	O	MFR OR FAB AT UNIT LEVEL	G	ASHORE AND	G	ASHORE AND	G	ASHORE AND	9	NON-CONSUMABLE;
		F	MFR OR FAB AT INTERMEDIATE / DS LEVEL		AFLOAT		AFLOAT		AFLOAT		3RD DEGREE ENGINE
		H	MFR OR FAB AT INTERMEDIATE / GS LEVEL	H	I/ASHORE	H	I/ASHORE	H	I/ASHORE		I-LEVEL
		L	MFR OR FAB AT SPECIALIZED REPAIR ACTIVITY (SRA)	K	CONTRACTOR	K	CONTRACTOR	K	DLR: CONTRACTOR	E	END-TO-END
		G	MFR OR FAB AT BOTH AFLOAT AND ASHORE		FACILITY		FACILITY		FACILITY		TEST
		D	MFR OR FAB AT DEPOT MAINTENANCE LEVEL	L	INTERMEDIATE	L	INTERMEDIATE	L	INTERMEDIATE	J	INTER-SERVICE
	A	O	ITEM: ASSEMBLED AT ORG/UNIT		SRA		SRA		SRA		DLR REPAIRABLE
		F	ITEM: ASSEMBLED AT INTERMEDIATE LEVEL - AFLOAT	D	DEPOT	D	DEPOT	D	DLR; CONDEMN		BELOW D-LEVEL
		H	ITEM ASSEMBLED AT INTERMEDIATE LEVEL - ASHORE						OR DISPOSE AT	M	REQUIRE
		L	ITEM: ASSEMBLED AT SRA						DEPOT		SPECIAL
		G	ITEM: ASSEMBLED AFLOAT OR ASHORE	Z	REF ONLY	Z	NON-REPAIRABLE	Z	NON-REPAIRABLE		HANDLING
		D	ITEM: ASSEMBLED AT DEPOT MAINTENANCE LEVEL			B	RECONDITION	A	NON-REPAIRABLE	P	PROGRESSIVE
	X	A	ITEM: REQUISITION NEXT HIGHER ASSEMBLY						BUT REQUIRES		MAINTENANCE
		B	ITEM: NOT PROCURED OR STOCKED. AVAILABLE THRU						SPECIAL HANDLING	R	GOLD DISC
			SALVAGE REQ BY CAGE/PART NUMBER								REPAIR
		C	INSTALLATION DRAWING, DIAGRAM, INTRUCTION							T	TRAINING
			SHEET. IDENTIFY BY CAGE/PART NUMBER								DEVICES
		D	NON-STOCKED. OBTAIN VIA LOCAL PURCHASE

FILE &F 5/4/2016

HEADER

ICAPS HEADER DATA

(and other miscellaneous information)

ASSIGNED PCCN: (LIMITED TO SIX (6) ALPHANUMBERIC CHARACTERS)

NAVSUP POC: Roy Baldassari ORSI 1W1H 717-605- 4679

	The red tabs ("WORKSHEET" and "WORKSHEET (2)", if required) have been prepared to assist you in providing the NECESSARY information that the NAVY needs to properly provision this equipment you have identified. Please do not hesitate to contact us for any questions or concerns you may have concerning this standard provisioning spreadsheet. Remember, the prime contractor of the equipment is normally responsible for providing this information that should have been identified in the Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL) of the contract. Your help and assistance in this matter will be greatly appreciated.
SUBMITTING ACTIVITY - PTD DEVELOPER
		WHO is requesting this equipment to be provisioned?
	REQUESTED BY -		WHO is the Point of Contact to answer questions about this provisioning submission?

ACTIVITY / COMPANY NAME -

REQUESTOR'S PHONE NUMBER - DSN - If we need additional information, HOW CAN WE REACH YOU?

REQUESTOR'S email ADDRESS - @

SUBMISSION DATE - / / What is the DATE OF THIS SUBMISSION?

CRITICAL DUE DATE - NO / / Is there a CRITICAL DUE DATE for this PCCN to be released to NAVSUP?

PROVISIONING AUTHORITY

	SEA			This equipment is under authority of the ACQUISITION PROGRAM MANAGER for LOGISTICS (APML) assigned to?
ACQUISITION PROGRAM		or	(CODE)

EXECUTIVE OFFICE (APEO) -	PMW		(INPUT the APML - SPAWAR APML SHOULD AUTO-POPULATE)	---
		(CODE)
			EQUIPMENT PROGRAM OR SYSTEM

BASELINE INFORMATION
			What is the CONTRACT NUMBER that this equipment was provided to the Navy (Procurement Instrument Identification Number - PIIN) ?
	PIIN / SPIIN -	NONE
		(Example: N00104-10-R-DA33)
			What is the REVISION LEVEL (Basic, Rev 1, etc.) of this provisioning being requested?
	CONTROL DATA -	BASIC

What is the SUBMISSION NUMBER? The first submission number is "01" and each successive incremental submission shall be one (1) number greater than the previously numbered submission.

SUBMISSION CONTROL - 01

The TYPE of PROVISIONING to be accomplished?

"N" - New APL development, "U" - APL Update (Adds and Deletes to an existing APL only), "M" - APL data element maintenance only), "E" - ECP APL Development (Adds and Quantity decreases), "X" - Design Change Notice (Adds, Deletes and Data Element Maintenance "Y" - Development prior to APL Maintenance / TSA PTD Release changes.

DCN FLAG - N

		NO
	PROCESS THE WORKSHEET(S) AS AN OVERLAY ???
(WIPE CLEAN THE EXISTING APL AND REPLACE WITH THIS NEW INFORMATION)
		NO
	DELETE THE ENTIRE APL ???

		Has a Record Identification Code (RIC) or an Allowance Parts List (APL) number already assigned to this equipment?
RIC / APL ASSIGNED -	NO

ICAPS MINIMUM APPLICATION IDENTIFICATION - ONE HULL OR SITE

IDENTIFY AT LEAST ONE HULL OR SHORE FACILITY R (UIC) UIC Quantiy Onboard

COMPONENT CHARACTERISTICS FILE (CCF DATA)
		Who is the Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) of this assembly?
	CAGE OF ASSEMBLY OEM -

	What is the Next Higher Assembly (NHA) of this equipment?
NEXT HIGHER ASSEMBLY -

		Is there a National Stock Number (NSN) established for the NHA?
NATIONAL STOCK NUMBER -	NA

	What is the A/N designation of the top level assembly?
A/N DESIGNATION -

	What is the Commercial Nomenclature of this assembly?
COMMERCIAL NOMENCLATURE -

	Has a System Nickname been associated with this equipment?
SYSTEM NICKNAME -

		Has an Equipment Identification Code (EIC) been established for this assembly?
EQUIPMENT IDENTIFICATION CODE -	NO

	Is there an ID number assigned to the Provisioning Parts List (PPL)?
SOURCE OF APL INFORMATION -

		Is there a Technical Manual developed for this provisioning package?
TECHNICAL MANUAL -	NO

		What is the drawing or schematic number/revision of the assembly being provisioned? (Please provide drawing with appropriate distribution statement)
ASSEMBLY DRAWING NUMBER -	REV

DOCUMENTATION REQUIREMENTS & CONTROLS
		Does this equipment contain military critical technology?
MILITARY CRITICAL TECHNOLOGY -	NO

		What is the classification of this equipment?
CLASSIFICATION -	UNCLASSIFIED

			Does this equipment have exclusive applicability?
EXCLUSIVE APPLICABILITY -	NO	GENERAL

		Does the documentation for this equipment require export control?
EXPORT CONTROL REQUIRED -	NO

		Does the documentation for this equipment require a destruction notice?
DESTRUCTION NOTICE REQUIRED -	NO

MAINTENANCE PHILOSOPHY FOR THIS PROVISIONING PACKAGE

A x government or __ commercially assigned depot will repair the equipment; CAGE is ________ . OTHER:

Repairable items will be returned to the OEM of the assembly

X	Repairable items will be returned to the OEM of the part; i.e. not the OEM of the assembly… (STD DEFAULT)
		( P L E A S E E X P L A I N )

CLARIFYING REMARKS:

2014

100A

BASIC

YES

SUBMARINE

U-NNPI

Vicki Sweet

1D4D

2015

100B

REV 1

SURFACE COMBATANT

NNPI

Matthew Derliunas

1D4E

2016

120A

REV 2

CARRIER

NOFORN

Daniel Boyer

1D4J

2017

120C

REV 3

AMPHIBIOUS

CLASSIFIED

Henry Depp

1D4M

2018

150A

MSC

LEVEL I

Bradley Faesel

1D4P

2019

150B

SPAWAR

SUBSAFE

Steven Hunsecker

1D4Q

2020

150C

GPETE

UNCLASSIFIED

Allen Miller

1D4R

160A

RADIAC

Jennifer Foose

1D4B

160C

GENERAL

Joanna Blackburn

1D4K

170A

Nicholas Roller

1D43

170B

Vacancy (Carr)

1D48

750

Roy Baldassari

1W1H

760

Adam Graeff

1W1U

770

Joel Wyatt

1W1B

790

Richard Flemister

1W1F

Leslie Horner

1D4C

Mike Pulaski

1D3B

Raymond Scott

1W1T

Drew Smith

1W1R

FILE &F.xlsx HEADER DATA 12/17/2015

WORKSHEET

	PCCN
Martin, Elliott E CIV: PROVISIONING CONTRACT CONTROL NUMBER	PLISN

Martin, Elliott E CIV: PROVISIONING

LIST

ITEM

SEQUENCE

NUMBER		PROV NOM
Martin, Elliott E CIV: PROVISIONING NOMENCLATURE	CAGE

Martin, Elliott E CIV: COMMERCIAL

AND

GOVERNMENT ENTITY

CODE PN

Martin, Elliott E CIV: PART

NUMBER	RNCC
Martin, Elliott E CIV: REFERENCE NUMBER CATEGORY CODE	RNVC
Martin, Elliott E CIV: REFERENCE NUMBER VARIATION CODE	EC

Martin, Elliott E CIV: ESSENTIALITY

CODE QPA

Martin, Elliott E CIV: QUANTITY

PER

ASSEMBLY

REFDES

Martin, Elliott E CIV: REFERENCE DESIGNATOR

QPA

NIIN

Martin, Elliott E CIV: NATIONAL

ITEM IDENTIFICATION

NUMBER NAME

Martin, Elliott E CIV: ITEM NAME

Martin, Elliott E CIV: UNIT

ISSUE UI PRICE

Martin, Elliott E CIV: UNIT

ISSUE

PRICE PLT

Martin, Elliott E CIV: PRODUCTION

LEAD

TIME AMC

Martin, Elliott E CIV: ACQUISITION METHOD

CODE AMSC

Martin, Elliott E CIV: ACQUISITION METHOD

SUFFIX

CODE	DMIL
Martin, Elliott E CIV: DEMILITARIZATION CODE	MRRI

Martin, Elliott E CIV: MAINTENANCE

REPLACEMENT

RATE

I MTBF

Martin, Elliott E CIV: MEAN TIME

BETWEEN

FAILURES SMR

Martin, Elliott E CIV: SOURCE, MAINTENANCE

AND RECOVERABILITY CODE MRRI MRRI MRRI MRRI MRRI MRU

Martin, Elliott E CIV: MINIMUM

REPLACEMENT

UNITS PSPC

Martin, Elliott E CIV: PHYSICAL

SECURITY

PILFERAGE

CODE NHCI

Martin, Elliott E CIV: NUCLEAR

HARDNESS

CRITICAL

ITEM PMIC

Martin, Elliott E CIV: PRECIOUS

METALS

INDICATOR

CODE	IND
Martin, Elliott E CIV: "IND" IS NOT MANDATORY AND IS USED TO ASSIST IN ASSIGNING, WHEN APPLICABLE, THE DEPOT REPAIRABLE DATA ELEMENTS FOR STOCKED ITEMS.	DOP1

Martin, Elliott E CIV: DESIGNATED

OVERHAUL

POINT RSR

Martin, Elliott E CIV: FAILURE

FACTOR

III

CODE RIP

Martin, Elliott E CIV: REMAIN

PLACE

INDICATOR

CODE	LENGTH
Martin, Elliott E CIV: LENGTH	WIDTH
Martin, Elliott E CIV: WIDTH	HEIGHT
Martin, Elliott E CIV: HEIGHT	WEIGHT
Martin, Elliott E CIV: WEIGHT		ALT
CAGE1	ALTPN1	ALT
RNCC1	ALT
RNVC1		ALT
CAGE2	ALTPN2	ALT
RNCC2	ALT
RNVC2		DOCUMENTATION

DISPOSITION

A001 . . 3 2 1 0001 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . EA 003 3 H A 0.1000 87600 "MEAN TIME BETWEEN FAILURES (MTBF)" IS NOT MANDATORY; HOWEVER, IT IS USED TO CALCULATE "MRRI", WHICH IS MANDATORY . . . . . . 0001 U X A Martin, Elliott E CIV: FOR

STOCKED

DEPOT REPAIRABLE

ONLY

(PxxDx)

C - COMMERCIAL

G - GOVERNMENT	"IND" IS NOT MANDATORY AND IS USED TO ASSIST IN ASSIGNING, WHEN APPLICABLE, THE DEPOT REPAIRABLE DATA ELEMENTS FOR STOCKED ITEMS.																NOT REQUIRED
		A002	.	.	3	2	1	0001	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.

Martin, Elliott E CIV: FOR

STOCKED

DEPOT REPAIRABLE

ONLY

(PxxDx)

C - COMMERCIAL

G - GOVERNMENT																NOT REQUIRED
	A003	.	.	3	2	1	0001	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.

Martin, Elliott E CIV: FOR

STOCKED

DEPOT REPAIRABLE

ONLY

(PxxDx)

C - COMMERCIAL

G - GOVERNMENT																NOT REQUIRED
	A004	.	.	3	2	1	0001	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.

Martin, Elliott E CIV: FOR

STOCKED

DEPOT REPAIRABLE

ONLY

(PxxDx)

C - COMMERCIAL

G - GOVERNMENT																NOT REQUIRED
	A005	.	.	3	2	1	0001	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.

Martin, Elliott E CIV: FOR

STOCKED

DEPOT REPAIRABLE

ONLY

(PxxDx)

C - COMMERCIAL

G - GOVERNMENT																NOT REQUIRED
	A006	.	.	3	2	1	0001	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.

Martin, Elliott E CIV: FOR

STOCKED

DEPOT REPAIRABLE

ONLY

(PxxDx)

C - COMMERCIAL

G - GOVERNMENT																NOT REQUIRED
	A007	.	.	3	2	1	0001	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.

Martin, Elliott E CIV: FOR

STOCKED

DEPOT REPAIRABLE

ONLY

(PxxDx)

C - COMMERCIAL

G - GOVERNMENT																NOT REQUIRED
	A008	.	.	3	2	1	0001	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.

Martin, Elliott E CIV: FOR

STOCKED

DEPOT REPAIRABLE

ONLY

(PxxDx)

C - COMMERCIAL

G - GOVERNMENT																NOT REQUIRED
	A009	.	.	3	2	1	0001	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.

Martin, Elliott E CIV: FOR

STOCKED

DEPOT REPAIRABLE

ONLY

(PxxDx)

C - COMMERCIAL

G - GOVERNMENT																NOT REQUIRED
	A010	.	.	3	2	1	0001	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.

Martin, Elliott E CIV: FOR

STOCKED

DEPOT REPAIRABLE

ONLY

(PxxDx)

C - COMMERCIAL

G - GOVERNMENT																NOT REQUIRED
	A011	.	.	3	2	1	0001	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.

Martin, Elliott E CIV: FOR

STOCKED

DEPOT REPAIRABLE

ONLY

(PxxDx)

C - COMMERCIAL

G - GOVERNMENT																NOT REQUIRED
	A012	.	.	3	2	1	0001	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.

Martin, Elliott E CIV: FOR

STOCKED

DEPOT REPAIRABLE

ONLY

(PxxDx)

C - COMMERCIAL

G - GOVERNMENT																NOT REQUIRED
	A013	.	.	3	2	1	0001	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.

Martin, Elliott E CIV: FOR

STOCKED

DEPOT REPAIRABLE

ONLY

(PxxDx)

C - COMMERCIAL

G - GOVERNMENT																NOT REQUIRED
	A014	.	.	3	2	1	0001	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.

Martin, Elliott E CIV: FOR

STOCKED

DEPOT REPAIRABLE

ONLY

(PxxDx)

C - COMMERCIAL

G - GOVERNMENT																NOT REQUIRED
	A015	.	.	3	2	1	0001	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.

Martin, Elliott E CIV: FOR

STOCKED

DEPOT REPAIRABLE

ONLY

(PxxDx)

C - COMMERCIAL

G - GOVERNMENT																NOT REQUIRED
	A016	.	.	3	2	1	0001	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.

Martin, Elliott E CIV: FOR

STOCKED

DEPOT REPAIRABLE

ONLY

(PxxDx)

C - COMMERCIAL

G - GOVERNMENT																NOT REQUIRED
	A017	.	.	3	2	1	0001	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.

Martin, Elliott E CIV: FOR

STOCKED

DEPOT REPAIRABLE

ONLY

(PxxDx)

C - COMMERCIAL

G - GOVERNMENT																NOT REQUIRED
	A018	.	.	3	2	1	0001	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.

Martin, Elliott E CIV: FOR

STOCKED

DEPOT REPAIRABLE

ONLY

(PxxDx)

C - COMMERCIAL

G - GOVERNMENT																NOT REQUIRED
	A019	.	.	3	2	1	0001	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.	.

Martin, Elliott E CIV: FOR

STOC…

This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated Dec 30, 2023.