N00024-20-R-4400-0001.pdf

N0002419FR62007

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this Amendment is to:

-Revise Section L as indicated herein.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 14

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 30-Jan-2020

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N0002420R4400

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

17-Jan-2020

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

30-Jan-2020

CODE

NAVAL SEA SYSTEMS COMMAND

1333 ISAAC HULL AVE SE

WASHINGTON NAVY YARD DC 20376

N00024 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N0002420R4400

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS

The following have been modified:

INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

I. INTRODUCTION

A. This solicitation is a Request for Proposals (RFP) that will result in the award of a single Fixed-Price contract to complete the USS PREBLE (DDG 88) Depot Modernization Period (DMP) availability.

B. The Government intends to award a single Fixed-Price contract to the offeror whose proposal represents the

Best Value to the Government, after evaluation in accordance with Section M of this solicitation.

C. ALL INQUIRIES shall be made in writing and directed to Erica Fetter, Contracting Officer, and Zachary

Tucker, Contract Specialist, at erica.fetter@navy.mil, and zachary.m.tucker@navy.mil, respectively. To ensure the Government is able to adequately address and respond to offeror pre-proposal information (PPI) via amendment, it is requested questions be submitted no later than 10 February 2020 at 3:00 pm, local time, Washington DC. The Navy reserves the right to not answer any requests received after this date and time. Furthermore, Offerors should note that the proposal due date will not be extended solely on the basis of requests received after this date and time. Solicitation questions should reference the solicitation and/or specification page and paragraph number and be submitted on the Pre-Proposal Information (PPI) form

(Attachment S-3) provided with this solicitation.

D. Estimated Award Date: The Government anticipates making an award in June 2020.

II. INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE SUBMISSION OF OFFERS

A. Proposal Due Date:

1. All copies of proposals (Volumes I & II) shall be received by the Government at the address below no later than 17 March 2020 at 03:00 pm, local time, Washington DC. Electronic submittal of proposals will not be accepted. Late proposals WILL NOT be considered. Partial proposals or attachments submitted late WILL NOT be considered. Offerors are advised to consult FAR 15.208 related to timely receipt of proposals.

a) Offerors must provide a proposal valid for at least 140 calendar days from the proposal due date.

(Complete block 12 of the Standard Form (SF) 33).

B. Proposal Submission:

1. Proposals shall be sent to:

Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) HQ

Attn: Erica Fetter, SEA 02445

1333 Isaac Hull Ave SE, Washington Navy Yard, DC 20736

2. Offerors shall mark all submittals “DO NOT OPEN PACKAGE IN MAIL ROOM—FORWARD

UNOPENED DIRECTLY TO SEA0244”. The outside of the package shall clearly indicate the

Offeror’s name, the solicitation number and the contents of the package.

mailto:erica.fetter@navy.mil mailto:justin.d.lessel@navy.mil

Volume Title

Number of Paper

Originals (See Note 1)

Number of

Paper Copies

Number of CDs (See

Notes 2 &3)

I Price Proposal 0 0 2

II Technical

Proposal

1* 0 4

a) Note 1:* Hard copy of technical proposal shall be submitted for Gantt Charts only. In the event the hard copy of the Gantt Chart conflicts with an offeror’s electronic technical proposal, the electronic version marked “ORIGINAL” shall take precedence. Originals may be shipped in the same boxes as the copies to eliminate excess shipping costs. However, one electronic copy shall be clearly labeled “ORIGINAL TECHNICAL PROPOSAL” or “ORIGINAL PRICE

PROPOSAL.” The exterior of each box MUST clearly indicate its contents.

b) Note 2: The CDs must be scanned to ensure the files contained on them do not contain any computer viruses. The CDs shall be labeled to indicate the Offeror’s name, the solicitation number and the associated volume numbers.

c) Note 3: The files on the CD shall be in a format that is compatible with and capable of being opened in the most current Microsoft Office Suite or Adobe Acrobat, as applicable. The material presented in electronic format shall be identical to the paper copy of the proposal. All spreadsheets shall be in Microsoft Excel format such that each mathematical equation is obvious.

No fields shall be password protected by Offerors. If files are compressed, the necessary decompression program must be included.

III. GENERAL INFORMATION

A. Ship Checks:

1. The precise sister ship to the USS PREBLE (DDG 88) available for ship check in San Diego, CA prior to the proposal submission due date is still to be determined based on the time the frame the offeror requests for a ship check visit.

2. To schedule a ship check, Offerors shall email a "Request for Ship Check" to Erica Fetter and Zachary

Tucker at erica.fetter@navy.mil and zachary.m.tucker@navy.mil, respectively. Due to the ship location, additional information will be provided upon request.

3. For Ships based in Naval Station San Diego, Participants will be subject to security, safety, and other applicable regulations established by Southwest Regional Maintenance Center (SWRMC) and ship’s

Commanding Officers. Contractors conducting SWRMC related work efforts must visit SWRMC security website for latest forms and instructions at:

http://www.navsea.navy.mil/Home/RMC/SWRMC/ https://www.cnic.navy.mil/regions/cnrsw/installations/navbase_san_diego.html

4. For Ships based in Naval Station Everett, Participants will be subject to security, safety, and other applicable regulations established by Puget Sound Naval Shipyard and IMF (PSNS &IMF) and ship’s

Commanding Officers. Contractors conducting PSNS &IMF related work efforts must visit PSNS &

IMF security website for latest forms and instructions at:

https://www.navsea.navy.mil/Home/Shipyards/PSNS-IMF/Command-Locations/Everett.aspx

a) https://www.cnic.navy.mil/regions/cnrnw/installations/ns_everett.html

B. Specifications and associated reference documentation

1. Upon request, the Government will provide the Specification Package Work Items (Attachment J-1) and Work Item References (Attachment J-2).

2. Offerors may request solicitation attachments by submitting a request to:

a) Erica Fetter at erica.fetter@navy.mil; and mailto:erica.fetter@navy.mil mailto:justin.d.lessel@navy.mil http://www.navsea.navy.mil/Home/RMC/SWRMC/

b) Zachary Tucker at zachary.m.tucker@navy.mil.

3. Additional work item references not already in the possession of the Offerors, commercially available, listed under 52.211-2, are available through the following websites:

a) https://jedmics.net/

b) https://mfom.sscno.nmci.navy.mil/MFOM/DoDStatement.aspx

c) https://nsedr.nnsy.navy.mil//

C. Alteration of Solicitation

1. Offerors shall respond to the solicitation as posted. Offerors who alter the solicitation (except for completing appropriate “fill-in” blocks and certifications) may be considered non-responsive and thus ineligible for award.

D. Proposal Information

1. Offerors shall not presume the Government has knowledge outside of information provided in the proposal. Additionally, Offerors are advised conclusory statements regarding an offeror’s experience such as: “the Offeror understands”, “the Offeror has a long history of outstanding support”, “standard procedures shall be used”, “well known techniques shall be employed”, or any paraphrasing of the solicitation, shall be considered inadequate to demonstrate experience, knowledge of, or compliance with solicitation requirements. Offerors shall provide specific and concise information to validate all assertions.

E. Amendments

1. The Government may revise the solicitation at any time by means of an Amendment. It is an Offeror’s responsibility to ensure it is accessing the beta.sam.gov website to view potential amendments and procurement notifications for this solicitation.

F. Teaming Arrangements

1. Proposals must be submitted by one (1) prime contractor. An Offeror may be listed as a subcontractor in multiple proposals but may only submit one (1) proposal as a prime contractor with a unique

Commercial and Government Entity (CAGE) code and Taxpayer Identification Number. To be evaluated as a Joint Venture (JV), Offerors must provide a notarized agreement (with the price proposal) delineating roles and responsibilities for all proposed work.

G. One-bid Situation

1. If the government receives only one bid for solicitation N00024-20-R-4400, the government reserves the right to require Certified Cost and Pricing Data in accordance with DFARS 252.215-7008.

IV. PROPOSAL FORMAT

A. To facilitate efficiency and consistency in proposal evaluation the following is mandatory. PROPOSALS

WHICH DO NOT FOLLOW THIS DIRECTION MAY BE REJECTED AS NON-RESPONSIVE

AND THUS INELIGIBLE FOR AWARD.

B. Electronic Proposals

1. All proposals shall be submitted via CD as outlined above. In addition, the Government requires

Offerors submit hard copies of Gantt charts generated in response to Non-Price Factor 2 (Schedule &

Resource Capacity). Pages, except the Integrated Master Schedule and Gantt charts, shall be formatted to 8.5 x 11 inch paper with one point margins. The text used shall be Times New Roman with a minimum of 12 point font. Any type contained on the Gantt charts and/or graphics shall not be smaller than 10-point font, shall be legible and readable. Any revisions to Offerors’ proposals (if required) shall be submitted in two (2) forms: (1) a final clean revised document; and (2) a redlined document outlining the offeror’s changes. Offerors shall use the attachments provided with this solicitation for their proposal content as specified in Section V where required.

C. Page Limits:

1. Volume I has no page limit with the exception of the cover letter which shall not exceed three (3) pages.

2. Volume II,

a) Factor 1: Eligibility Factor: No page limitation

b) Factor 2: Schedule and Resource Capacity:

(1) Subfactor A (1): No page limitation

(2) Subfactor A (2): No page limitation

(3) Subfactor A (3): No page limitation

(4) Subfactor A (4): Shall not exceed 25 pages

(5) Subfactor B (1): Shall not exceed 10 pages

(6) Subfactor C (1): No page limitation

(7) Subfactor C (2): No page limitation

V. PROPOSAL CONTENT

A. VOLUME I

1. Price Proposal: The price proposal shall not contain non-price factor information. The price proposal shall be comprised of the following documentation:

a) Cover Letter,

b) Signed SF 33 with all amendments acknowledged,

c) Small Business Subcontracting plan per FAR Part 19 (large businesses only),

d) Any Joint Venture / teaming agreements (if applicable),

e) Completed Attachment J-4 and Solicitation Section B carrying forward information from the Pricing

Workbook Spreadsheet, Attachment J-4, as applicable, containing:

(1) Work Item Pricing,

(2) Daily Extension Rates,

(3) Inter-port Differential (IPD),

(4) IPD Reduction for Days Completed Early,

(5) Value Adjusted Total Evaluated Price (VATEP) Reduction (if applicable),

(6) Fully Burdened Ship Repair Labor & Material Burden Rate, New Work & Growth Reservation, and,

(7) Pricing for all Option items.

f) Completed Execution Milestones and Key Event Dates (Attachment J-3).

g) Completed Proposal Assessment (Attachment S-7).

2. Cover Letter: The cover letter, which shall not exceed three (3) pages, shall meet all the requirements of the “first page of the proposal” outlined in FAR 52.215-1(c)(2)(i-v). In addition to those requirements, the

Offeror shall include the following in the cover letter:

a) Identification of all enclosures included with the proposal,

b) CAGE and Data Universal Numbering System (DUNS) numbers for the Prime contractor,

c) Notice of any alterations to the solicitation, such as “fill-in” blocks and certifications.

d) Notice of any alterations to the solicitation (except for completing appropriate “fill-in” blocks and certifications).

e) Name, address, and telephone number of each proposed first-tier subcontractor with a proposed subcontract estimated at $10 million or more.

f) For any work item (WI) with a total dollar value of zero dollars proposed in the Pricing Workbook

(Attachment J-4) provide an explanation as to why. In addition, if applicable:

(1) For any WI with a total value of zero labor hours proposed (prime and subcontractor combined)

(although material is proposed), provide an explanation as to why.

(2) For any WI with a total dollar value of zero material proposed (prime and subcontractor combined) (although labor is proposed), provide an explanation as to why.

3. Standard Form 33 (SF 33): As part of the price proposal package, the Offeror shall submit the completed

SF 33 with blocks 12 through 18 completed, as well as all sections with applicable “fill-ins” filled in and shall acknowledge all amendments. The representative who signs this form must be authorized to contractually bind the company providing the offer. Section B CLIN pricing must also be completed for

ALL APPLICABLE CLINs. The Offeror shall complete and provide all Representations, Certifications, and Other Statements included in Section K of the solicitation. Submission of a signed offer to the

Government constitutes agreement and acceptance of the terms and conditions of the solicitation in a FFP contracting environment.

4. Subcontracting Plan:

a) A subcontracting plan is NOT REQUIRED from a small business concern.

b) Large business(es) submitting a subcontracting plan must provide rationale for any proposed goals that are lower than:

(1) 20 percent of prime contracts for small businesses

(2) 5 percent of prime and subcontracts for women-owned small businesses

(3) 5 percent of prime contracts and subcontracts for small disadvantaged businesses

(4) 3 percent of prime contracts and subcontracts for HUBZone small businesses

(5) 3 percent of prime and subcontracts for service-disabled veteran-owned small businesses

c) Address FAR 52.219-9 and all of the subparagraphs in FAR 52.219-9(d): subparagraphs (12), (13),

(14) and (15).

5. Completed Solicitation Section B and Pricing Workbook (Attachment J-4):

a) Offerors must propose on all applicable contract line items (CLINs) including all base and option

CLINs, complete Section B “NOTE B: SCHEDULE OF PRICES / RATES: SHIP REPAIR

LABOR RATE (FULLY BURDENED),” complete Section B “NOTE D: SCHEDULE OF

EXTENSION DAILY RATES FOR PIERSIDE AND DRY DOCKING (FULLY BURDENED)

FOR PURPOSES OF AN EXTENSION DUE TO EXCUSABLE OR COMPENSABLE

DELAY,” and complete all tabs of Pricing Workbook (Attachment J-4) to be considered responsive.

b) The contractor must submit prices using the Pricing Workbook (Attachment J-4) containing Work Item

Pricing, Daily Extension Rates, IPD, IPD Reduction for Days Completed Early, VATEP, and Fully

Burdened Ship Repair Labor Rate & Material Burden Rate in Microsoft Excel in the format provided in this solicitation. The breakdown of CLIN prices, corresponding to the work item pricing, must add up to the total of each CLIN. If there is a discrepancy between the two, the CLIN price shall govern. The Pricing Workbook (Attachment J-4) Fully Burdened Ship Repair Labor Rate and

Material Burden Rate must match the rates provided in the Section B “NOTE B: SCHEDULE OF

PRICES / RATES: SHIP REPAIR LABOR RATE (FULLY BURDENED).” If there is a discrepancy between the two, the Section B Fully Burdened Ship Repair Labor Rate and

Material Burden Rate shall govern.

c) Offerors are to insert pricing in all yellow shaded fields in the pricing workbook (Attachment J-4).

6. VATEP Schedule Acceleration (USS PREBLE FY20 DMP) (Attachment S-6):

a) The Government would obtain additional value, in terms of additional Operational Availability, should the contract complete before its no-later-than Contract Complete date. If an Offeror chooses to apply a

VATEP schedule acceleration, it will be evaluated in the Volume I price evaluation and be incorporated in the resultant contract via Section F delivery dates and Attachment J-3. Offerors are to propose any VATEP schedule acceleration in attachment J-3. The Government will apply a Total

Evaluated Price reduction based on the values shown in Attachment S-6 using the proposed number of

“Days Completed Early” in Attachment J-3.

7. Inter-port Differential (IPD)

a) The IPD applicable to the USS PREBLE FY20 DEPOT MODERNIZATION PERIOD must be included in all offers and is calculated using foreseeable costs for fuel, towing and pilot charges, and travel to the contractor’s facility by applicable Government personnel. The following chart provides the values to be included in all Offerors’ price proposals to determine the Offeror’s total evaluated price.

Location Differential

Portland, OR $4,471,759

Seattle, WA $2,870,736

San Diego, CA $382,870

b) Offeror’s whose location is not listed in the above Government provided port differential tables shall submit a bidder’s question requesting a Government provided port differential be calculated for the offeror’s proposed location for both the USS PREBLE FY20 DEPOT MODERNIZATION

PERIOD.

8. Pier Differential- A Government Provided Pier Differential may be proposed for Offerors that are relying on the Government to supply the required pier space in Everett, WA. The following charts provides the value to be included in all Everett, WA based Offerors price proposals proposing to use the Naval Station Pier to determine the offeror’s total evaluated price.

a) USS PREBLE FY20 DEPOT MODERNIZATION PERIOD

Location Differential

Everett, WA $1,010,329

B. VOLUME II

Non-Price Proposal: The non-price proposal shall be comprised of two factors, as follows:

1. Factor 1 – Eligibility Factor:

Offerors must provide the following to demonstrate eligibility for Award, (There is no page limit associated with this Factor):

a) Provide a completed Eligibility Criteria Data Sheet (Attachment S-5) that identifies the specific pier and dock intended to be used for the proposed availability and indicates that the pier and dock meet the minimum characteristics identified in Attachment S-5.

b) Provide a signed letter identifying and confirming ownership of a pier capable of berthing and a dry-dock capable of docking the vessel during the applicable period in accordance with the Execution

Milestones & Key Events (Attachment J-3). The representative who signs the letter must be authorized to contractually bind the company. If the Offeror is utilizing a subcontractor for physical resources

(pier or dry-dock), a letter signed by the subcontractor identifying and confirming committed access to the proposed pier & dry-docks is required. The subcontractor representative who signs the letter must be authorized to contractually bind the company. The proposed pier and dry-dock facilities, whether owned by the Offeror or subcontractor, must be accessible by the USS PREBLE without any modification to the vessel.

c) Provide a copy of the Offeror's current Master Ship Repair Agreement (MSRA), MSRA number, or proof of MSRA equivalency that meets the requirement of CNRMC instruction 4280 series. To be eligible for award, a prospective contractor must possess a MSRA as described in DFARS 217.71

Master Agreement for Repair and Alteration of Vessels (MARAV) or demonstrate organization and facilities equivalent to that reflected in a MSRA. Offerors meeting this eligibility requirement with documents and evidence outside of a MSRA must contact the PCO to schedule an on-site inspection.

All requests for MSRA equivalency inspections must be received by 1:00 pm, local time, Washington DC on 31 January 2020. Requests shall be sent to Erica Fetter and Zachary Tucker at erica.fetter@navy.mil and zachary.m.tucker@navy.mil. Failure to request an inspection by the designated time may result in a negative determination of Offeror eligibility.

d) In accordance with the most current version of MIL-STD-1625D, provide a current dry-dock certification applicable to the dry-dock proposed for the Availability. Certifications shall demonstrate the dry-dock will remain certified throughout the entire proposed use of the dry-dock. If the proposed dry-dock is currently uncertified, or if the certification will expire prior to the end of the Offeror's proposed docking period, the Offeror shall provide a detailed plan and schedule to certify or re-certify the dry-dock in order to remain certified throughout the proposed docking period in the Execution

Milestones & Key Events (Attachment J-3)

2. Factor 2 –Resource Capacity & Schedule:

Offerors shall demonstrate their ability to provide the manpower resources, and the physical resource capacity, to complete the USS PREBLE FY20 DEPOT MODERNIZATION PERIOD requirements as proposed, by addressing the following three (3) Sub-factors:

a) Sub-factor A - Manpower

(1) Manpower Plan to Actual Data Sheet, (Attachment S-4)

(a) Provide a completed Manpower Plan to Actual Data Sheet, (Attachment S-4) in Microsoft

Excel in the format provided in this solicitation for all projects, including all discrete commercial, ship repair and new construction projects, that are on-going or completed within their proposed shipyard and within the local Naval Station, if their shipyard is within the homeport area of fleet concentration area between the week commencing 22 April 2019 and the week concluding 27 December 2019. For each project, provide the man day information requested on a week by week basis over the project’s duration to the contractual delivery date and to the contractor expected delivery date. Data shall be current as of the week concluding

27 December 2019. Data tables shall be provided in Microsoft Excel. Data shall be provided in accordance with the following definitions:

i. Project Start Date – The contractually agreed start of contractor project execution.

ii. Project Completion Date - The contractually agreed contractor completion date, start of corresponding to the contractor’s Performance Measurement Baseline (PMB)

iii. Actual / Forecast Completion Date - The Contractor’s Actual Completion Date (if project completed prior to 27 December 2019 or the Contractor’s Forecast Completion

Date based on the Contractor’s most likely estimate (if expected to occur after 27

December 2019).

iv. Performance Measurement Baseline (PMB) – The weekly time-phased man day resourced plan, prime and subcontractor, against which the accomplishment of authorized work can be measured, aligned to the contractor’s contractually agreed schedule of record.

v. Budgeted Cost of Work Scheduled (BCWS) - The sum of the man day budgets for all work (prime and subcontractor), scheduled within each given weekly time period.

vi. Budgeted Cost of Work Performed (BCWP) - A measurement of the work completed, BCWP is the value of work performed, or “earned,” by both prime and subcontractor when compared to the original plan, that is, the Budgeted Cost of Work Scheduled mailto:erica.fetter@navy.mil

(BCWS). The BCWP is the value of completed work expressed as the man day value of the performance man day budget assigned to that work. The sum of the budgets for completed work packages and completed portions of open work packages. Within the S-

4, the BCWP is the man day value completed within each given weekly time period.

vii. Actual Cost of Work Performed (ACWP) - The man days actually incurred and recorded, prime and subcontractor, in accomplishing the work performed within each given weekly time period.

viii. Estimate to Complete (ETC) – The contractor’s weekly time-phased man day resource plan, prime and subcontractor, aligned to the contractor’s most likely man day and contract completion estimate.

(2) The Offeror shall provide three (3) Manpower Curves (Total) in accordance with the requirements detailed in CDRL A012 that graphically delineate the resources tied to each individual ship availability in men-per-day. All curves provided shall span the date of this solicitation through the

“Contract Complete” date, total manpower ceiling including expected growth and new work, and shall show correlated manning values across all curves. If the expected growth and new work on surface ship maintenance availabilities is different from the growth CLINs included in the contract and any new work included in the Availability’s proposal evaluation, please explain in the offeror’s narrative. The Offeror shall include a data table providing the numerical data by trade that populates each curve. There is no page limit associated with this documentation. Data tables shall be provided in Microsoft Excel. A curve shall be provided for each of the following and reflect the full Availability duration:

a) The manpower curve (total) associated with the requirements detailed in CDRL A012 Initial

IPS for the proposed Availability. This chart shall show the total FTE resources currently employed by the Offeror and expected to be employed by the Offeror.

b) The total FTE resources required to complete this proposed Availability plus work the Offeror currently has under contract from the date of this solicitation through the “Contract Complete” date. This shall be represented by multiple stacked curves each representing an individual

Availability. Each ship Availability shall be labeled by hull number. This chart shall commence at the start of the earliest project included in the offeror’s S-4 and continue through the completion of this solicitation’s “Contract Complete” date. This chart shall show the total man days currently employed by the Offeror and expected to be employed by the Offeror.

c) The total FTE resources required to complete this proposed Availability plus work the Offeror currently has under contract during the Availability duration, plus work the Offeror may complete, including the resources to complete ALL outstanding proposals as of 10 calendar days prior to the proposal due date, and the resources required to complete any other anticipated requirements from the date of this solicitation through “Contract Complete” date.

All projects included in the Manpower Utilization Data Sheet (Attachment S-1), shall be included in this curve. This shall be represented by multiple stacked curves each representing an individual Availability. Each ship Availability shall be labeled by hull number. This chart shall commence at the start of the earliest project included in the offeror’s S-4 and continue through the completion of this solicitation’s “Contract Complete” date. This chart shall show the total man days currently employed by the Offeror and expected to be employed by the

Offeror.

*Offerors shall ensure the data presented in the manpower curves correlates with the man days proposed for all base, options growth and new work. Provide a calculations translation as part of the required excel tables.

(3) The Offeror shall provide Manpower Curves (Trade) in accordance with the requirements detailed in CDRL A012 which graphically delineates the resources tied to each trade in men-per-day. All curves provided shall span the date of this solicitation through the “Contract Complete” date and shall show correlated manning values, including expected growth and new work, across all curves.

If the expected growth and new work on surface ship maintenance availabilities is different from the growth CLINs included in the contract and any new work included in the Availability’s proposal evaluation, please explain in the offeror’s narrative. For the purposes of building these charts, the offeror shall assume that expected growth and new work is proportional to the trade breakdown of each Availability’s defined scope. If the Offeror’s trade break down for expected growth and new work is different than the from the trade breakdown of each Availability’s defined scope, please explain in the Offeror’s narrative. Offeror shall include a data table providing the numerical data by trade that populates each curve. Data tables shall be provided in Microsoft

Excel. The following trades shall be reflected in each curve: Abrasive cleaning/blasting, Fire

Watch, Welding, Burning, Brazing, Carpentry, Machinists (inside and outside), Electrical

Work, Electronic Work, Engineering, Design Support, Lagging, Ship-fitting, Boiler-making, Painting, Sheet-metal Work, Pipefitting, Rigging, General Labor, Staging/Scaffolding an d

Diesel Mechanics. There is no page limit associated with this documentation. Curve(s) shall be provided for each of the following and reflect the date of this solicitation through “Contract

Complete” date:

(a) The manpower curve (trade) associated with the requirements detailed in CDRL A012 Initial

IPS for the proposed Availability.

(b) The trade FTE resources required to complete this proposed Availability plus work the

Offeror currently has under contract from the date of this solicitation through “Contract

Complete” date. This chart shall commence at the start of the earliest project included in the

Offeror’s S-4 and continue through this solicitation’s “Contract Complete” date. This shall be represented by multiple stacked curves each representing an individual trade. Each trade shall be labeled.

(c) The trade FTE resources required to complete this proposed Availability plus work the

Offeror currently has under contract from the date of this solicitation through “Contract

Complete” date, plus work the Offeror may complete, including the resources to complete

ALL outstanding proposals and the resources required to complete any other anticipated requirements from the date of this solicitation through “Contract Complete” date. All projects included in the Manpower Utilization Data Sheet (Attachment S-1) shall be included in this curve. This chart shall commence at the start of the earliest project included in the Offeror’s

S-4 and continue through the completion of this solicitation’s “Contract Complete” date. This shall be represented by multiple stacked curves each representing an individual trade. Each trade shall be labeled.

(d) Chart showing the total available trade FTE resources currently employed by the Offeror and expected to be employed by the Offeror from the date of this solicitation through “Contract

Complete” date. This chart shall commence at the beginning of the evaluated period provided in the Offeror’s attachment S-4 and continue through the completion of this solicitation’s

“Contract Complete” date. This shall be represented by multiple stacked curves each representing an individual trade. Each trade shall be labeled.

*Offerors shall ensure the data presented in the manpower curves correlates with the man days proposed for all base, options growth and new work. Provide a calculations translation as part of the required excel tables.

(4) Offerors shall provide a narrative, not to exceed 25 pages:

(a) That supports the extent to which the Offeror has provided the planned man days, both prime and subcontractor, necessary to complete all their current projects, including all discrete commercial, ship repair and new construction projects, completed within their proposed shipyard and within the local Naval Station, if their shipyard is within the homeport area of fleet concentration area. As part of their narrative, Offerors shall provide:

(i) A root cause analysis of any shortfalls in the completion of production man days to schedule and inefficiencies in the amount of man days actually required to complete the man days budgeted for that work, as identified in the data submitted in Attachment S-4.

“Shortfalls” are defined as cumulative actual man days completed (ACWP) less than baseline man days planned (BCWS). “Inefficiencies” are defined as cumulative actual man days completed (ACWP) less than the cumulative baseline man day budget for that work completed (BCWP).

(ii) An explanation of the mitigations implemented and planned to resolve those shortfalls and inefficiencies on the solicited availability, a timeline of their implementation, and a quantified explanation of their observed or expected effectiveness.

(iii) An explanation of how the Offeror will provide the proposed manpower resources to complete the solicited availability, accounting for:

a. the Offeror’s current manpower resourcing performance as shown in the

Offeror’s current S-4 Manpower Plan to Actual Data Sheet, including all projects between the week commencing 22 April 2019 and the week concluding

27 December 2019.

b. the Offeror’s workload during the current period.

c. the Offeror’s workload during the proposed Availability, accounting for work the Offeror currently has under contract and work the Offeror may complete, including the resources to complete ALL outstanding proposals and the resources required to complete any other anticipated requirements during the

Availability period of performance.

(b) Corresponding to the curves (total) and (trade), provided in response to Factor 2, Sub-factor

A, Manpower, paragraphs (2) and (3), outline how the Offeror will achieve proposed manning levels via overtime, additional hiring actions, or the utilization of subcontractors (if applicable). Outline the state of the Offeror’s current workforce (Factor 2, Sub-factor A, paragraph (4)) in relationship to the proposed Availability, and ensure the following areas are addressed:

(i) Should the Offeror propose to utilize overtime for the proposed availability, the narrative shall include a plan to manage and provide the overtime from “Avail Start” through

“Contract Complete” dates, as outlined in Attachment J-3, plus work the Offeror may complete, including the resources to complete ALL outstanding proposals and the resources required to complete any other anticipated requirements from “Avail Start” through “Contract Complete.”

The Government considers the use of overtime to increase the risk of unsuccessful contract performance. Offerors shall include in their narrative an explanation of how they will manage and mitigate the following potential risks:

a. Degraded Safety

b. Decreased Productivity

c. Increased workforce absenteeism and turnover

(ii) Should the Offeror propose to hire additional personnel for the proposed Availability, the narrative shall include a plan to manage and provide the additional personnel from “Avail

Start” through “Contract Complete,” plus work the Offeror may complete, including the resources to complete ALL outstanding proposals and the resources required to complete any other anticipated requirements from “Avail Start” through “Contract Complete.”

(iii) Should the Offeror propose to utilize subcontracted resources for the proposed

Availability, the Offeror shall include in their narrative an explanation of the requirements that will be completed by the prime and the work that will be subcontracted, including the work item, trade and duration of each subcontract requirement. The

Government considers the use of subcontractors in excess of 45% of production labor to increase the risk of unsuccessful contract performance. The Offeror shall include in its narrative a plan to manage the subcontractor manning levels included from “Avail Start” through “Contract Complete,” plus work the Offeror may complete, including the resources to complete ALL outstanding proposals and the resources required to complete any other anticipated requirements from “Avail Start” through “Contract Complete.”

b) Subfactor B – Physical Resource Capacity

(1) The Offeror shall provide a narrative and a graphical representation (in the format of the Pier and Dry-dock Graphical Representation Template (Attachment S-8)) that demonstrates that the

Offeror has the pier and dry-dock available to complete the requirements of the proposed

Availability. The graphical representation shall show the pier and dry-dock expected to be in working capacity by month from proposal submission through the “Contract Complete” date in

Attachment J-3, and the awarded and outstanding work utilizing those resources by month. The narrative shall not exceed 10 pages, and the narrative and graphical representation shall address the following:

(a) The pier and dry-dock required to complete work the Offeror currently has under contract based on current contract schedule. Additionally, identify the total pier and dry-dock currently in working capacity, and expected to be in working capacity by month from proposal submission through the “Contract Complete” date in Attachment J-3.

(b) The pier and dry-dock required to complete all outstanding proposals, per proposed schedules. Identify the pier and dry-dock committed to previously awarded requirements, as well as the proposed use of resources to complete the work of ALL outstanding proposals (including this proposal).

(c) The pier and dry-dock required to complete any other anticipated requirements (including but not limited to non-navy work, pier and dry-dock upgrades, maintenance or dredging).

(d) Should the Offeror propose to utilize subcontracted pier or dry-dock, the Offeror shall include an explanation of the requirements that will be sourced by the prime's facility and the pier and dry-dock that will be provided by the subcontractor.

(e) The Offeror's plan to resolve pier and dry-dock resource conflicts as a result of the award of other outstanding proposals, pier and dry-dock shall not be committed to multiple ships during the same time period without reasonable explanation.

(f) In the event the Offeror proposes an interval of less than seven (7) days between the undocking date of other requirements and the proposed docking date of this Availability, and/or a proposed docking date within the first seven (7) days of the Availability, then the narrative shall detail the necessary steps to accomplish.

c) Subfactor C - Integrated Production Schedule (IPS)

(1) The Offeror shall provide documentation for the proposed Availability inclusive of the resource loaded Initial Integrated Production Schedule elements. (The format in CDRL A012 shall be used as the template for IPS submissions.) A Resource Loaded Schedule is a project-related schedule that consists of a timeline with details on allocated resources, planned activities and preset milestones. It is a time management document that explains how project manpower resources are to be consumed throughout scheduled project time. The offeror shall provide the reports in the electronic formats required and in paper (hard copy) format. The hard copy of the Gantt charts shall be provided on 11 x 17 inch paper. Offerors shall integrate all work included in the work package, including all base and option items. However, for the purposes of proposal submission only, reports do not require incorporation of Alteration Installation Team (AIT) schedules, Government-Contracted Third Party Maintenance Provider schedules, Ship's Force schedules, Commercial Industrial Services (CIS) schedules, Fleet Maintenance Activity (FMA) schedules and Government Intermediate-Level schedules. There is no page limit associated with this documentation.

(2) The Offeror shall provide a narrative to explain their Integrated Production Schedule. The narrative shall address the following:

(a) Demonstrate how the Offeror has scheduled the performance of all work items included in the

Availability work package (including both Base and Option items) so as to permit the contract scope increases described in Section B, Note F (all new and growth work identified in this solicitation) without causing delay or disruption to the work required by the aforementioned work items, to any other Government contract, or to any other work in progress for the

Government.

(b) Review their schedule in accordance with the Schedule Metrics provided in Defense Contract

Management Agency (DCMA) Earned Value Management System (EVMS) Program

Analysis Pamphlet (PAP) DCMA-EA PAM 200.1, October 2012, Section 4.0. In accordance with the DCMA instruction, the Contractor shall calculate the 14 required metrics and explain any flags or areas of concern.

3. Factor 3 –Past Performance:

Offerors may provide past performance information for up to five (5) previous contracts. If the Offeror has not completed any contracts as a prime contractor, within three (3) years of the date of the initial solicitation’s posting to beta.SAM.gov, information regarding the Offeror’s performance with regard to subcontracts and/or commercial contracts may be submitted. Offerors shall complete Attachment S-2 Past Performance

Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) References for each of the contracts provided where CPARS contract data is available. If CPARS data is not available for a contract, Offerors shall provide Attachment S-9 Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ).

Offerors shall demonstrate within either Attachment S-2 or Attachment S-9 that the referenced contracts are recent and relevant to the efforts required by this solicitation. Offerors shall also address unfavorable reports of past performance and their response, or lack thereof, will be taken into consideration.

“Recent” is defined as a contract in-progress or completed within the last three (3) years as of the date of the initial solicitation. .

“Relevant” is defined as a contract that is of similar scope, magnitude, and complexity to the requirements set forth in this solicitation.

o Scope: The measure of the similarity in work item requirements as set forth in

Attachment J-1 Work Specification Package, and J-2 Plans, Drawings and Supporting

References, and other requirements of this solicitation.

o Magnitude: The measure of the similarity of the volume, dollar value and/or duration of the work actually performed under the offeror’s submitted contracts to the requirements of this solicitation.

o Complexity: The measure of the similarity of technical difficulty, managerial intricacy and/or required coordination of efforts and disciplines performed by the offeror in its submitted contracts to the requirements of this solicitation.

An Offeror that does not have recent and relevant past performance to provide for consideration is requested to affirmatively state that it does not have recent and relevant past performance for the

Government to consider.

If the Offeror does not have CPARS and is required to submit Attachment S-9, the Offeror shall instruct their customers to complete the Past Performance Questionnaires and return them before the closing date of this solicitation.

E-mail to:

Erica Fetter, Contracting Officer, erica.fetter@navy.mil and

Zachary Tucker, Contract Specialist, zachary.m.tucker@navy.mil

Any questionnaire received after the proposal due date/time may be considered as late and may not be considered in the Offeror’s past performance evaluation. The Government, at its discretion, will determine whether or not questionnaires received after the proposal due date will be considered.

All Offerors that are large business shall address historical compliance with the requirements of FAR Part

52.219-9 (Small Business Subcontracting Plan) and DFARS 252.219-7003 (Small Business Subcontracting

Plan (DOD CONTRACTS)) in a separate narrative not to exceed one page. eSRS information attached to the narrative is not included in the page limits.

(End of Summary of Changes)