N00024-20-R-4205 Amendment 0003 Redlined.docx

N0002420R4205

Section B - Supplies or Services and Prices

CLIN Number 0001

Planning Yard Program Support

CPAF

Class Configuration Support Planning Yard Support for LPD-17, LHD/A, LSD, and LCC Class Ships See Notes B and C FOB: Destination

PURCHASE REQUEST NUMBER: N0002420NR63000

PSC CD: K019

ESTIMATED COST

BASE FEE

SUBTOTAL EST COST + BASE

MAX AWARD FEE

TOTAL EST COST + FEE

CLIN Number 0002

Ship/Availability Product Work

Planning Yard Support for LPD-17, LHD/A, LSD, and LCC Class Ships See Notes B and C FOB: Destination

ESTIMATED COST

BASE FEE

SUBTOTAL EST COST + BASE

MAX AWARD FEE

TOTAL EST COST + FEE

CLIN Number 0003

Each

DATA

See Notes B, C and F

NOTE: The requirements in DFARS 252.211-7003, Item Identification and Valuation, are applicable for this line item. The contractor shall provide DoD unique identification or a DoD recognized unique identification equivalent.

FOB: Destination

PSC CD: 1905

NET AMT

CLIN Number 0004

Travel

COST

For LPD-17, LHD/A, LSD, and LCC Class Ships See Notes B, C and E

NTE: $ 7,750,000

FOB: Destination

ESTIMATED COST

CLIN Number 0005

Emergent Installation Work

Emergent Installation work on board LPD-17 Class Ships See Notes B and C FOB: Destination

ESTIMATED COST

BASE FEE

SUBTOTAL EST COST + BASE

MAX AWARD FEE

TOTAL EST COST + FEE

CLIN Number 0006

Provisioned Items Orders (PIO)

CPFF

Provisioned Items Orders (PIO) and Other Planning Yard Material For LPD-17, LHD/A, and LCC Class Ships See Notes B, C, D and G.

NTE: $249,000,000 which includes CLIN 0007 Performance Incentive Fee (PIF). At time of award the NTE value of CLIN 0006 will be reduced by the CLIN 0007 PIF maximum amount.

NOTE: The requirements in DFARS 252.211-7003, Item Identification and Valuation, are applicable for this line item. The contractor shall provide DoD unique identification or a DoD recognized unique identification equivalent.

FOB: Destination

ESTIMATED COST

FIXED FEE

TOTAL EST COST + FEE

CLIN Number 0007

Lot

Performance Incentive Fee

FFP

Performance Incentive Fee for PIO Material (CLIN 0006). See Attachment 10 Performance Incentive Fee Plan. Estimated amount is (to be filled in at contract award).

See Notes C, D and G FOB: Destination

NET AMT

CLIN Number 0101

CPAF

Class Configuration Support Planning Yard Support for LPD-17, LHD/A, LSD, and LCC Class Ships See Notes A, B and C FOB: Destination

ESTIMATED COST

BASE FEE

SUBTOTAL EST COST + BASE

MAX AWARD FEE

TOTAL EST COST + FEE

CLIN Number 0102

CPAF

Planning Yard Support for LPD-17, LHD/A, LSD, and LCC Class Ships See Notes A, B and C FOB: Destination

ESTIMATED COST

BASE FEE

SUBTOTAL EST COST + BASE

MAX AWARD FEE

TOTAL EST COST + FEE

CLIN Number 0103

Each

See Notes A, B, C, and F

NOTE: The requirements in DFARS 252.211-7003, Item Identification and Valuation, are applicable for this line item. The contractor shall provide DoD unique identification or a DoD recognized unique identification equivalent.

FOB: Destination

NET AMT

CLIN Number 0104

COST

For LPD-17, LHD/A, LSD, and LCC Class Ships

NTE: $ 7,740,000

ESTIMATED COST

CLIN Number 0105

CPAF

Emergent Installation work on board LPD-17 Class Ships See Notes A, B, and C FOB: Destination

ESTIMATED COST

BASE FEE

SUBTOTAL EST COST + BASE

MAX AWARD FEE

TOTAL EST COST + FEE

CLIN Number 0201

CPAF

Class Configuration Support Planning Yard Support for LPD-17, LHD/A, LSD, and LCC Class Ships See Notes A, B and C FOB: Destination

ESTIMATED COST

BASE FEE

SUBTOTAL EST COST + BASE

MAX AWARD FEE

TOTAL EST COST + FEE

CLIN Number 0202

CPAF

Planning Yard Support for LPD-17, LHD/A, LSD, and LCC Class Ships See Notes A, B and C FOB: Destination

ESTIMATED COST

BASE FEE

SUBTOTAL EST COST + BASE

MAX AWARD FEE

TOTAL EST COST + FEE

CLIN Number 0203

Each

See Notes A, B, C, and F

NOTE: The requirements in DFARS 252.211-7003, Item Identification and Valuation, are applicable for this line item. The contractor shall provide DoD unique identification or a DoD recognized unique identification equivalent.

FOB: Destination

NET AMT

CLIN Number 0204

COST

For LPD-17, LHD/A, LSD, and LCC Class Ships

NTE: $ 7,720,000

ESTIMATED COST

CLIN Number 0205

CPAF

Emergent Installation work on board LPD-17 Class Ships See Notes A, B, and C FOB: Destination

ESTIMATED COST

BASE FEE

SUBTOTAL EST COST + BASE

MAX AWARD FEE

TOTAL EST COST + FEE

CLIN Number 0301

CPAF

Class Configuration Support Planning Yard Support for LPD-17, LHD/A, LSD, and LCC Class Ships See Notes A, B and C FOB: Destination

ESTIMATED COST

BASE FEE

SUBTOTAL EST COST + BASE

MAX AWARD FEE

TOTAL EST COST + FEE

CLIN Number 0302

CPAF

Planning Yard Support for LPD-17, LHD/A, LSD, and LCC Class Ships See Notes A, B and C FOB: Destination

ESTIMATED COST

BASE FEE

SUBTOTAL EST COST + BASE

MAX AWARD FEE

TOTAL EST COST + FEE

CLIN Number 0303

Each

See Notes A, B, C, and F

NOTE: The requirements in DFARS 252.211-7003, Item Identification and Valuation, are applicable for this line item. The contractor shall provide DoD unique identification or a DoD recognized unique identification equivalent.

FOB: Destination

NET AMT

CLIN Number 0304

COST

For LPD-17, LHD/A, LSD, and LCC Class Ships

NTE: $ 7,710,000

ESTIMATED COST

CLIN Number 0305

CPAF

Emergent Installation work on board LPD-17 Class Ships See Notes A, B, and C FOB: Destination

ESTIMATED COST

BASE FEE

SUBTOTAL EST COST + BASE

MAX AWARD FEE

TOTAL EST COST + FEE

CLIN Number 0401

CPAF

Class Configuration Support Planning Yard Support for LPD-17, LHD/A, LSD, and LCC Class Ships See Notes A, B and C FOB: Destination

ESTIMATED COST

BASE FEE

SUBTOTAL EST COST + BASE

MAX AWARD FEE

TOTAL EST COST + FEE

CLIN Number 0402

CPAF

Planning Yard Support for LPD-17, LHD/A, LSD, and LCC Class Ships See Notes A, B and C FOB: Destination

ESTIMATED COST

BASE FEE

SUBTOTAL EST COST + BASE

MAX AWARD FEE

TOTAL EST COST + FEE

CLIN Number 0403

Each

See Notes A, B, C, and F

NOTE: The requirements in DFARS 252.211-7003, Item Identification and Valuation, are applicable for this line item. The contractor shall provide DoD unique identification or a DoD recognized unique identification equivalent.

FOB: Destination

NET AMT

CLIN Number 0404

COST

For LPD-17, LHD/A, LSD, and LCC Class Ships

NTE: $ 7,690,000

ESTIMATED COST

CLIN Number 0405

CPAF

Emergent Installation work on board LPD-17 Class Ships See Notes A, B, and C FOB: Destination

ESTIMATED COST

BASE FEE

SUBTOTAL EST COST + BASE

MAX AWARD FEE

TOTAL EST COST + FEE

CLIN Number 0501

CPAF

Class Configuration Support Planning Yard Support for LPD-17, LHD/A, LSD, and LCC Class Ships See Notes A, B and C FOB: Destination

ESTIMATED COST

BASE FEE

SUBTOTAL EST COST + BASE

MAX AWARD FEE

TOTAL EST COST + FEE

CLIN Number 0502

CPAF

Planning Yard Support for LPD-17, LHD/A, LSD, and LCC Class Ships See Notes A, B and C FOB: Destination

ESTIMATED COST

BASE FEE

SUBTOTAL EST COST + BASE

MAX AWARD FEE

TOTAL EST COST + FEE

CLIN Number 0503

Each

See Notes A, B, C and F

NOTE: The requirements in DFARS 252.211-7003, Item Identification and Valuation, are applicable for this line item. The contractor shall provide DoD unique identification or a DoD recognized unique identification equivalent.

FOB: Destination

NET AMT

CLIN Number 0504

COST

For LPD-17, LHD/A, LSD, and LCC Class Ships

NTE: $ 7,680,000

ESTIMATED COST

CLIN Number 0505

CPAF

Emergent Installation work on board LPD-17 Class Ships See Notes A, B, and C FOB: Destination

ESTIMATED COST

BASE FEE

SUBTOTAL EST COST + BASE

MAX AWARD FEE

TOTAL EST COST + FEE

CLIN Number 0601

CPAF

Class Configuration Support Planning Yard Support for LPD-17, LHD/A, LSD, and LCC Class Ships See Notes A, B and C FOB: Destination

ESTIMATED COST

BASE FEE

SUBTOTAL EST COST + BASE

MAX AWARD FEE

TOTAL EST COST + FEE

CLIN Number 0602

CPAF

Planning Yard Support for LPD-17, LHD/A, LSD, and LCC Class Ships See Notes A, B and C FOB: Destination

ESTIMATED COST

BASE FEE

SUBTOTAL EST COST + BASE

MAX AWARD FEE

TOTAL EST COST + FEE

CLIN Number 0603

Each

See Notes A, B, C, and F

NOTE: The requirements in DFARS 252.211-7003, Item Identification and Valuation, are applicable for this line item. The contractor shall provide DoD unique identification or a DoD recognized unique identification equivalent.

FOB: Destination

NET AMT

CLIN Number 0604

COST

For LPD-17, LHD/A, LSD, and LCC Class Ships

NTE: $ 7,660,000

ESTIMATED COST

CLIN Number 0605

CPAF

Emergent Installation work on board LPD-17 Class Ships See Notes A, B, and C FOB: Destination

ESTIMATED COST

BASE FEE

SUBTOTAL EST COST + BASE

MAX AWARD FEE

TOTAL EST COST + FEE

NOTES A-G

NOTE A

Option item to which the option clause in SECTION I-2 applies and which is to be supplied only if and to the extent said option is exercised.

NOTE B

The Facilities Capital Cost of Money (FCCOM) is not a fee bearing cost under this contract. However, such amount is included in the total estimated cost for the purpose of the “LIMITATION OF COST” clause in this contract.

NOTE C

Performance of work under Contract Items 0001 through 0007, and if Options are exercised, Items 0101-0105, 0201-0205, 0301-0305, 0401-0405, 0501-0505, and 0601-0605 are subject to technical instructions issued pursuant to the clause entitled TECHNICAL INSTRUCTIONS (NAVSEA 5252.242-9115).

NOTE D

Applicable to CLINs 0006 and 0007. For ordering material, see Section C clause HQ C-1-0005 PROVISIONED ITEMS ORDERS- ALTERNATE I (NAVSEA) (APR 2015).

NOTE E

Applicable to CLINs 0004, and if Options are exercised, CLINS, 0104, 0204, 0304, 0404, 0504, and 0604. The contractor shall obtain prior written approval by the Administrative Contracting Officer (ACO) as concurred with by the Contracting Office’s Representative (COR), prior to each trip occurrence. All estimated and incurred travel costs shall be in accordance with the Join Travel Regulations (JTR) and FAR 31.205-46. Airfare costs in excess of the lowest priced airfare available to the contractor during normal business hours are unallowable unless approved in writing as meeting an exception per FAR 31.205-46(b) by the ACO prior to commencement of travel. Travel costs will be reimbursed at cost only, with no provision for fee.

NOTE F

Not Separately Priced (NSP): Price included in the price of CLIN(s) 0001, 0002, 0004, 0005, and 0006, and if Option(s) are exercised, 0101, 0102, 0104, 0105, 0201, 0202, 0204, 0205, 0301, 0302, 0304, 0305, 0401, 0402, 0404, 0405, 0501, 0502, 0504, 0505, 0601, 0602, 0604, and 0605.

NOTE G

Applicable to CLINs 0006 and 0007. At time of award the $249,000,000 NTE amount of CLIN 0006 will be reduced by the CLIN 0007 PIF amount proposed by the offeror in Attachment L-2. CLIN 0007 incentive fee amount will be calculated based on CLIN 0006 total cost only, exclusive of the total average COM percent calculated in Attachment L-2 and the fixed fee percentage proposed by the offeror in Attachment L-2. See example below.

Award Amount

Total Cost (including Indirect Rates and Burdens)

$ 236,917,221.69

Total Cost + COM

$ 237,154,138.92

Total CPFF (Total CLIN 0006)

$ 244,261,655.57

Total CLIN 0006 and CLIN 0007

$ 249,000,000.00

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT

B-215-H002 REFUNDS (SPARES AND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT) (NAVSEA) (OCT 2018)

(a) In the event that the price of a spare part or item of support equipment delivered under this contract significantly exceeds its intrinsic value, the Contractor agrees to refund the difference. Refunds will not be made to recoup the amount of cost decreases that occur over time due to productivity gains (excluding economic purchase quantity considerations) or changes in market conditions.

(b) For purposes of this requirement, the intrinsic value of an item is defined as follows:

(1) If the item is one which is sold or is substantially similar or functionally equivalent to one that is sold in substantial quantities to the general public, intrinsic value is the established catalog or market price, plus the value of any unique requirements, including delivery terms, inspection, packaging, or labeling.

(2) If there is no comparable item sold in substantial quantities to the general public, intrinsic value is defined as the price an individual would expect to pay for the item based upon an economic purchase quantity as defined in FAR 52.207-4, plus the value of any unique requirements, including delivery terms, inspection, packaging or labeling.

(c) At any time up to two years after delivery of a spare part or item of support equipment, the Contracting Officer may notify the Contractor that based on all information available at the time of the notice, the price of the part or item apparently exceeds its intrinsic value.

(d) If notified in accordance with paragraph (c) above, the Contractor agrees to enter into good faith negotiations with the Government to determine if, and in what amount, the Government is entitled to a refund.

(e) If agreement pursuant to paragraph (d) above cannot be reached, and the Navy's return of the new or unused item to the Contractor is practical, the Navy, subject to the Contractor's agreement, may elect to return the item to the Contractor. Upon return of the item to its original point of Government acceptance, the Contractor shall refund in full the price paid. If no agreement pursuant to paragraph (d) above is reached, and return of the item by the Navy is impractical, the Contracting Officer may, with the approval of the Head of the Contracting Activity, issue a Contracting Officer's final decision on the matter, subject to Contractor appeal as provided in the "Disputes" clause (FAR 52.233-1).

(f) The Contractor shall make refunds, as required under this requirement, in accordance with instructions from the Contracting Officer.

(g) The Contractor shall not be liable for a refund if the Contractor advised the Contracting Officer in a timely manner that the price it would propose for a spare part or item of support equipment exceeded its intrinsic value, and with such advice, specified the estimated proposed price, the estimated intrinsic value and known alternative sources or item, if any, that can meet the requirement.

(h) This requirement does not apply to any spare parts or items of support equipment whose price is determined through adequate price competition. This requirement also does not apply to any spare part or item of support equipment if the Contractor submitted, and certified the currency, accuracy and completeness of, cost or pricing data applicable to the item.

(End of text)

B-216-H005 DETERMINATION OF AWARD FEE (NAVSEA) (MAR 2019)

(a) Minimum Fee

The base fee, as set forth in Section B of this contract, shall constitute a minimum fee to be paid for the performance of this contract. The Base Fee shall be paid in accordance with the clause of this contract entitled "FIXED FEE" (FAR 52.2168).

(b) Award Fee

In addition to the minimum (or base fee) to be paid hereunder, if any, the Contractor may earn an award fee as determined by the Fee Determining Official (FDO). The Government's purpose in granting an award fee is to encourage and reward superior Contracting effort directed toward performance of this contract. The specifics for evaluation are set forth in paragraphs that follow.

(c) Award Fee Evaluation Board

The Contractor shall be paid such award fee as may be determined to be appropriate by an Award Fee Determining Official (AFDO), the Surface Ship Modernization Major Program Manager (PMS 407), Deputy Program Manager (PMS 407B) or designee, based on recommendations of an Award Fee Evaluation Board (AFEB) consisting of no less than five of the following members (or designated alternates):

1) Supervisor of Shipbuilding, Commanding Officer or Deputy

2) Director, Planning and Programming (PMS 407P) (Chair)

3) Director, Execution (407E)

4) PAPM, Amphibious Ship Planning (PMS 407P)

5) PAPM, Amphibious Ship Execution (PMS 407E)

6) PAPM, Planning Yard (PMS 407PY)

7) Procuring Contracting Officer (SEA 02422)

8) PMS 407 COR

9) SUPSHIP– Administrative Contracting Officer

(d) Fee Determining Official

At the end of each performance period, as set forth in this provision, the Award Fee Determining Official shall, based on the recommendation of the Award Fee Evaluation Board and any other pertinent information, determine the amount of award fee which will be paid to the Contractor for work accomplished during the period under evaluation.

(e) Award Fee Determination and Reclama Procedures

The Contractor shall furnish the Award Fee Evaluation Board a self-evaluation and such other information as may be reasonably required to enhance the Board’s evaluation of the Contractor’s work in the below areas as follows:

(1) Within fifteen calendar days after the end of each evaluation period under this contract, the Contractor shall submit his assessment of performance during the evaluation period to PMS 407, except that financial performance data for the last month of the period will be provided no later than 30 calendar days after the end of the period.

The Contractor’s self-evaluation shall include, for each factor of each category, by element:

(i) A list of significant events scheduled for accomplishment, prior to the start of the period, and events added to the schedule during the period.

(ii) A list of significant events actually accomplished.

(iii) A list of significant events scheduled, but not accomplished.

(iv) A list of significant events scheduled for the next evaluation period.

(v) A summary self-assessment.

(2) Within forty-five calendar days after the end of the evaluation period, the Award Fee Evaluation Board (AFEB) shall receive reports, oral and/or written, as considered necessary, from Government performance monitors designated by the Chairperson of the AFEB. The AFEB shall consider the reports of the Government monitors, and any other relevant data and shall arrive at a consensus recommended score for each category. The Contractor may be invited to have a senior representative present during reports by Government monitors, but not during AFEB deliberation and voting.

(3) Within five calendar days after the AFEB deliberations, the Chairperson of the AFEB shall advise the Award Fee Determining Official of the AFEB's recommended ratings and award fee amounts and rationale.

(4) Within ten calendar days following the AFEB recommendation, the AFDO will provide the award fee determination in writing to the Procuring Contracting Officer setting forth the award fee determination, with rationale. Within ten calendar days of receipt of the AFDO determination, the Contracting Officer will provide the award fee determination in writing to the Contractor setting forth the award fee determination, with rationale

(5) In the event that the Contractor concurs in the award fee determination in paragraph (4), the AFDO's determination shall be final.

(6) The Contractor may, within six calendar days of receipt of the award fee determination, submit a request for reconsideration.

(a) Any such request shall identify and explain specific facts that the Contractor believes should be considered and shall present all relevant performance, both negative and positive, for each category, factor and element which the Contractor believes merits a different evaluation.

(b) Any such request shall be submitted to the AFDO with simultaneous copies to the Procuring Contracting Officer and the Chairperson of the AFEB.

(c) If a request for reconsideration is not received by the Procuring Contracting Officer within the above time period, it will be considered that the Contractor has concurred in the award fee determination in paragraph (4).

(7) In the event that the Contractor submits a timely request for reconsideration, the AFDO shall provide to the Procuring Contracting Officer a final award fee determination within ten calendar days of receipt of the Contractor's request.

(8) Within 21 calendar days of receipt of the final award fee determination, the Contracting Officer shall issue a unilateral modification to the contract to provide for the earned award fee.

(f) Fee Determination Official’s Determination

Determinations of the FDO with respect to the amount of the award fee to be paid to the Contractor and the methodology for determining the award fee are unilateral decisions made solely at the discretion of the Government.

(g) Evaluation Categories and Factors

The following categories and factors represent the general areas of Contractor performance which may be considered by the AFEB in the determination of the periodic Award Fee allocations throughout the performance of the contract. The Contractor’s performance during each evaluation period will be based on the five categories as listed below, which include, but are not limited to, the factors listed within the categories. The factors will generally be evaluated for quality, timeliness, responsiveness, cost performance and overall management.

(1) Schedule Performance

(2) Technical Quality Performance

(3) Program Management Performance

(4) Cost Performance

(5) Material Kitting Performance

For each evaluation period, the category weighting factors will be 20%, 20%, 20%, 20%, and 20% respectively. The Government may, at its discretion, unilaterally make changes in the evaluation categories as well as adjustments to the weighting of categories, if any, prior to commencement of each evaluation period. These changes will be made by unilateral modification issued by the Procuring Contracting Officer, and notice will be provided to the Contractor prior to commencement of the evaluation period. Unsatisfactory performance under a performance fee criterion may result in an increased weighting for the criteria during future evaluation periods.

1. Schedule Performance

(i) Effectiveness in meeting preplanned milestones. Particular consideration will be given to the Contractor’s ability to: review schedule progress with the government; maintain adequate progress in anticipation of completion of milestones; identify potential or actual problem(s) to the government; and coordinate Contractor and Government to resolve problem(s) mutually.

(ii) Effectiveness of resource utilization, to meet planning and production schedules. This may include such items as methods and procedures to minimize time lost on the job and between jobs and to perform work with a reasonable number of qualified personnel.

(iii) Effectiveness in meeting all relevant Navy Modernization Process Management and Operations Manual (NMP-MOM Rev 4) milestones and CDRL requirements.

(iv) Consideration for the delivery of technical and advance planning documents, progress reports, and SHIPALT cost estimates.

(v) The ability to schedule, monitor, and produce specifications, technical drawings, data, and other products which represent practical engineering solutions based on trade-offs between total costs, reliability, maintainability, and producibility.

1. Technical Quality Performance

(i) Liaison with Navy and Contractors, to obtain necessary technical data and documents required to issue drawings, work specifications, test procedures, test plans, availability analyses, and similar documents in performing repairs and alterations. Emphasize the use of simple solutions and economic work methods for accomplishment. The number of jobs held up for lack of engineering information, and rapidity with which waterfront engineering problems are resolved.

(ii) Effectiveness of planning documents for emergent repairs and alterations, as indicated by completeness of the work, minimum number of post-repair deficiencies and satisfactory completion of post-repair tests with little or no rework and retest in the period during which sea trials occurs. This includes the ability to develop (rapidly) the drawing package to support fast track alterations, prototypes or necessary work instructions.

(iii) Effectiveness of the contractor in the use of Government Furnished Information (GFI) and Navy Stock Number (NSN) standard stock material. Consideration for the timeliness of waiver requests, changes, identification of documentation errors or problems.

(iv) Effectiveness of applying Navy technical specifications to control the quality of drawings (detail design), test procedures, work specifications, and technical instructions to accomplish alterations and repairs.

(v) Responsiveness in issuing drawings, sketches, work specifications, LARs, and similar documents required by the Supervisor and by the waterfront organization in performing repairs and alterations. Use of simple solutions and economic work methods for job accomplishment, the number of milestones missed because of deficient engineering and planning information and the cost of rework caused by inadequate contractor technical documentation or solutions to work requirements. This includes an aggressive approach to incorporate LARs, drawing changes and lessons learned in future availabilities to minimize government execution costs.

1. Program Management Performance

(i) Timely negotiation and definitization of change orders, including prompt and timely submission of proposals and cost estimates and willingness to provide information required by the Government for negotiations.

(ii) Effectiveness of the Contractor in the use of GFI. The Contractor will be assessed on the effectiveness in detecting technical errors in GFI prior to production and on the effectiveness in working with the Supervisor to resolve problems before they have an adverse impact on planning yard or repair or maintenance efforts. The Contractor will be assessed on its ability to apply GFI to its engineering of work, use of GFI in installation, test, and checkout of completed work.

(iii) The responsiveness of the contractor’s purchasing, obtaining and providing the material necessary to maintain waterfront schedules. Factors such as: the number of jobs held up because of lack of material; cost savings obtained through the use of economic purchasing techniques (i.e., procurement options or multi-unit purchases where appropriate); and the avoidance of expenditures on such things as premium transportation costs will be considered. The selection of cost-effective material, when several approved options exist, will be considered.

(iv) Effectiveness of the on-scene availability management team with respect to: the quality and timeliness of the support provided during availability execution; the ability of the planning yard to remain current in availability issues and to ensure that accurate, timely and informed communications are maintained with the ship, TYCOM, and Surface Combatant Program Manager.

(v) Effectiveness of the planning yard’s efforts in support of the SEA 21 Program Manager’s Representative (PMR) management concept. This includes progressive and innovative management techniques in comparison to the more traditional approach of performing only assigned tasks.

(vi) Responsiveness of the planning yard’s management team in striving constantly to improve the Navy’s availability advance planning and execution processes, including Team building and proactive workload sharing between Government activities and the planning yard to avoid potential duplication of efforts and capitalizing on automation advances to increase functional efficiencies.

1. Cost Performance

(i) Effectiveness in early identification of cost problems and timely resolution of identified problems. The timely and accurate submission of cost performance and status of funds.

(ii) Effectiveness of the Contractor’s ability to control costs and to avoid unnecessary cost increases. Particular emphasis will be placed on the Contractor’s ability to estimate correctly the first time, to maintain the initial budget, and to make cost-effective decisions with respect to technical requirements, schedule and quality control.

(iii) Any special or innovative cost-control and cost-avoidance initiatives.

(iv) The cost-effective and timely production of advance planning products, whether deliverables under the contract or required for the Contractor’s internal production planning.

1. Material Kitting Performance

(i) Quality and delivery timeliness of SHIPALT long lead-time material (LLTM), LLTM summary reports and costs estimates. This includes status of material delivery with accurate estimated delivery dates, accuracy of material cost proposals and delivery of 4720 reports in accordance with CDRL A015.

(ii) Effectiveness and timeliness of resolving material kitting problems. This includes delivery of material in accordance with the JFMM delivery milestone for GFM, expediting material delivery in accordance with waterfront production requirements for material delivered after the JFMM milestone.

(iii) Effectiveness in responding to requests to use Class Common Equipment assets.

Neither factors within categories, nor elements within factors are assigned predetermined importance or weights, and their relative importance for evaluation purposes is at the discretion of the Award Fee Evaluation Board Members and the Award Fee Determining Official. This is expected to vary from period to period, depending upon scheduled and actual activities.

(h) Evaluation Periods/Award Fee Pool

(1) The following evaluation periods and associated award fee pools are hereby established. The Government reserves the right to adjust the evaluation period and allocation of award fee pool available for each period by unilateral contract modification, which shall be issued, if at all, prior to the start of the affected evaluation period(s). Award Fee evaluations will commence not later than 90 calendar days following the end of each evaluation period.

EVALUATION PERIODS

1st Evaluation Period Contract Award through six months after Contract Award

(2) There will be no rollover of unearned award fee.

(3) Award Fee shall be available for consideration of payment semi-annually. The award fee pool for any six-month award fee evaluation period shall be based on the actual hours performed during that same period and cumulative hours performed throughout the base/option year; provided, that in any annual contract period, a minimum of 40% of the potential Award Fee available for the full contract year shall be allocated to the award fee pool for the final evaluation period, defined as the last evaluation period within each one-year period. Individual pools shall be maintained for each individual Line of Accounting.

(4) Notwithstanding the limitation set forth in paragraph (1) above, the Award Fee available for payment during the final evaluation period of any contract year may be adjusted to less than 40% of the potential Award Fee available for the full contract year in the event the Contracting Officer should determine that a lower percentage is appropriate in light of the existing facts and circumstances and the HCA approves the adjustment in writing, in accordance with DFARS 216.405-2.

The award fee pool for any given award fee evaluation period shall be determined in accordance with the following example:

Example (Total Base or Option Year Funded Amounts):

FOR THE INITIAL AWARD FEE EVALUATION PERIOD (Base Year or Option Years as applicable):

FOR EACH SUBSEQUENT AWARD FEE EVALUATION PERIOD (Base Year or Option Years as applicable):

Total Award Fee Pool $480,000

In no event shall the cumulative award fee pool for a given year (Base or Option year as applicable) exceed one hundred percent (100%) of the award fee pool listed in Section B for that year.

Unearned award fee pool for any evaluation period shall not be rolled forward to, and shall not be available for use in, any future award fee evaluation period.

The Government reserves the right to adjust the above evaluation periods by unilateral contract modification.

(i) Performance Ratings

(1) In evaluating Contractor performance, the following adjective and numerical ratings will be used:

The Contractor shall not earn an Award Fee for a numerical score of 49 or below.

The Award Fee earned by the contractor for each evaluation period shall be calculated as: Award Fee = Numerical Score (expressed as a percentage with a maximum of 100%) X Award Fee Pool for that period

(j) Maximum Fee

In no event shall the total fee (base fee plus award fee) under this contract exceed 9% of total estimated cost.

(k) Payment of Award Fee

The Contractor shall be paid award fee, if any, upon submittal of a proper invoice or voucher to the cognizant Payment Office, together with a copy of the unilateral modification to the contract authorizing payment of award fee for the applicable Evaluation Period. The Contractor's invoice shall show the amount of award fee payable to each subline item, which shall be directly proportionate to the amount or allowable Estimated Cost (exclusive of base fee and FCCOM) incurred by the Contractor during the Evaluation Period. The Contractor's invoice must cite the appropriate accounting data in order for payment to be affected. There will be no provisional, interim, or advance billing of award fee prior to a final determination of the FDO and execution by the contracting officer of a contract modification authorizing payment.

B-227-H001 PROVISIONING TECHNICAL DOCUMENTATION – WITHHOLDING OF PAYMENT (NAVSEA) (OCT 2018)

(a) For the purpose of paragraph (c) of the "Progress Payments" clause of this contract, if included, the requirement that the Contractor develop and deliver Provisioning Technical Documentation (PTD) is considered to be a "material requirement of this contract," and Contractor failure to make adequate progress in the development of PTD, or to deliver acceptable PTD on a timely basis, may result in reduction or suspension of Progress Payments as provided in said paragraph.

(b) The PTD is considered to be a part of the "Technical Data" specified to be delivered under this contract for the purposes of the "Technical Data--Withholding of Payment" (DFARS 252.227-7030) clause. The terms and conditions of the clause entitled "Limitation On Withholding of Payments (FAR 52.232-9), if included in this contract, shall not apply to withholding of payment for failure to make timely delivery of the PTD or delivery of deficient PTD.

B-231-H001 TRAVEL COSTS (NAVSEA) (OCT 2018)

(a) Except as otherwise provided herein, the Contractor shall be reimbursed for its actual travel costs in accordance with FAR 31.205-46. The travel costs to be reimbursed shall be those costs for which the Contractor has maintained appropriate documentation and which have been determined to be allowable, allocable, and reasonable by the Procuring Contracting Officer, Administrative Contracting Officer, or their duly authorized representative.

(b) Reimbursable travel costs include only that travel performed from the Contractor's facility to the worksite, in and around the worksite, and from the worksite to the Contractor's facility.

(c) Relocation costs and travel costs incidental to relocation are allowable to the extent provided in FAR 31.205-35; however, Procuring Contracting Officer approval shall be required prior to incurring relocation expenses and travel costs incidental to relocation.

(d) The Contractor shall not be reimbursed for the following daily local travel costs:

(i) travel at U.S. Military Installations where Government transportation is available,

(ii) travel performed for personal convenience/errands, including commuting to and from work, and

(iii) travel costs incurred in the replacement of personnel when such replacement is accomplished for the Contractor's or employee's convenience.

B-232-H003 PAYMENTS OF FEE (S) (COMPLETION) (NAVSEA) (OCT 2018)

(a) For purposes of this contract, "fee" means "target fee" in cost-plus-incentive-fee type contracts, "base fee" in cost-plus-award-fee type contracts, or "fixed fee" in cost-plus-fixed-fee type contracts.

(b) The Government shall make payments to the Contractor, subject to and per the clause in this contract entitled "Fixed Fee" (FAR 52.216-8) or "Incentive Fee", (FAR 52.216-10), as applicable. Such payments shall be equal to (to be completed at contract award) percent ( to be completed at contract award ) of the allowable cost of each invoice submitted by and payable to the Contractor pursuant to the clause of this contract entitled "Allowable Cost And Payment" (FAR 52.216-7), subject to the withholding terms and conditions of the "Fixed Fee" or "Incentive Fee" clause, as applicable (percentage of fee payable is based on fee dollars divided by estimated cost dollars including facilities capital cost of money). Fee shall not be applied on Facilities Capital Cost of Money per FAR 15.404-4(c)(3) and DFARS 215-404-71-4. Total fee(s) paid to the Contractor shall not exceed the fee amount(s) set forth in this contract.

(c) In the event of discontinuance of the work under this contract, or any specified phase of the contract, per the clause of this contract entitled "Limitation of Funds" (FAR 52.232-22) or "Limitation of Cost" (FAR 52.232-20), as applicable, the fee shall be equitably adjusted by mutual agreement to reflect the diminution of work. If the adjusted fee is less than the sum of all fee payments made to the Contractor under this contract, the Contractor shall repay the excess amount to the Government. If the adjusted fee exceeds all payments made to the Contractor under this contract, the Contractor shall be paid the additional amount, subject to the availability of funds. In no event shall the Government be required to pay the Contractor any amount in excess of the funds obligated under this contract at the time of the discontinuance of work.

(d) Fee(s) withheld pursuant to the terms and conditions of this contract shall not be paid until the contract has been modified to reduce the fee(s) per paragraph (c) above, or until the Procuring Contracting Officer has advised the paying office in writing that no fee adjustment is required.

B-232-H004 PAYMENTS OF FEE(S) (LEVEL OF EFFORT)--BASIC (NAVSEA) (OCT 2018)

(a) For purposes of this contract, "fee" means "target fee" in cost-plus-incentive-fee type contracts, "base fee" in cost-plus-award-fee type contracts, or "fixed fee" in cost-plus-fixed-fee type contracts.

(b) The Government shall make payments to the Contractor, subject to and per the clause in this contract entitled "Fixed Fee" (FAR 52.216-8) or "Incentive Fee", (FAR 52.216-10), as applicable. Such payments shall be equal to to be completed at contract award percent ( to be completed at contract award %) of the allowable cost of each invoice submitted by and payable to the Contractor pursuant to the clause of this contract entitled "Allowable Cost And Payment" (FAR 52.216-7), subject to the withholding terms and conditions of the "Fixed Fee" or "Incentive Fee" clause, as applicable (percentage of fee is based on fee dollars divided by estimated cost dollars, including facilities capital cost of money). Fee shall not be applied on Facilities Capital Cost of Money per FAR 15.404-4(c)(3) and DFARS 215-404-71-4. Total fee(s) paid to the Contractor shall not exceed the fee amount(s) set forth in this contract.

(c) The fee(s) specified in SECTION B, and payment thereof, is subject to adjustment pursuant to paragraph (g) of the text entitled Level of Effort. If the fee(s) is reduced and the reduced fee(s) is less than the sum of all fee payments made to the Contractor under this contract, the Contractor shall repay the excess amount to the Government. If the final adjusted fee exceeds all fee payments made to the contractor under this contract, the Contractor shall be paid the additional amount, subject to the availability of funds. In no event shall the Government be required to pay the Contractor any amount in excess of the funds obligated under this contract at the time of the discontinuance of work.

(d) Fee(s) withheld pursuant to the terms and conditions of this contract shall not be paid until the contract has been modified to reduce the fee(s) per the text entitled Level of Effort", or until the Procuring Contracting Officer has advised the paying office in writing that no fee adjustment is required.

CLAUSES INCORPORATED BY FULL TEXT

B-232-H006 LIMITATION OF COST OR LIMITATION OF FUNDS CLARIFICATION (NAVSEA) (OCT 2018)

The clause entitled "Limitation of Cost" (FAR 52.232-20) or "Limitation of Funds" (FAR 52.232-22), as appropriate, shall apply separately and independently to each separately identified estimated cost.

Section C - Descriptions and Specifications

SECTION C:

NOTE: TECHNICAL AND SCHEDULE REQUIREMENTS WHICH ARE PROVIDED IN THE NMP-MOM (NSTM SL720-AA-MAN-030) REVISION 4 ARE APPLICABLE EXCEPT WHERE IN CONFLICT WITH ANY MILESTONE PRESENTED IN COMNAVSURFOR MEMORANDUM 4700 Ser N00/532 of 5 AUGUST 2019 (CONTRACT ATTACHMENT 1) OR CONTRACT CDRL. PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT MILESTONES PROVIDED IN ATTACHMENT 1 AND CONTRACT CDRLS SUPERCEDE ANY ASSOCIATED MILESTONE PROVIDED IN THE NMP-MOM.

1.0 The Contractor shall perform the following Efforts described below:

1.1 Program Support, Class Configuration Support (CLIN 0001 and if options are exercised, CLINs 0101, 0201, 0301, 0401, 0501, and 0601).

Effort 1: General Scope of Work

1. Except as otherwise specifically provided herein, the Contractor shall furnish all material, facilities, personnel, quality control, inspection and test facilities and management control required to perform the effort covered by this contract in accordance with the requirements set forth below.

1. The Contractor shall provide and maintain facilities for the Supervisor, his/her assistants and other Government employees equal to those provided by the Contractor for his/her own use for generally similar purposes.

1. In all instances involving mass transfer of technical data and drawings from the Planning Yard to another activity, the Planning Yard shall evaluate current media and processes and recommend methods for transferring the data digitally instead of paper or other hard copy. The Ship Program Manager (SPM) PMS 407 will update contract data requirements to reflect approved changes.

1. The Contractor shall provide the coordination, review, assignment, control, execution, and status reporting of work required by this contract.

1. For those meetings for which the Contractor is the designated host, the Contractor shall:

1. Provide adequate meeting space;

1. Prepare meeting minutes and action item lists (CDRLs A001 and A002); and

1. Provide post-meeting follow up of Contractor-responsible action items (CDRLs A001 and A002).

1. System for Award Management The contractor shall report ALL contractor labor hours (including subcontractor labor hours) required for performance of services provided under this contract via a secure data collection site. The government reporting application is transitioning to System for Award Management Web site (https://www.sam.gov). The website provides guidance on registering, using the website and reporting requirements.

1. Transition Plan Review.

The contractor shall support a Transition Plan review meeting no more than 15 days after contract award to review all elements in the contractor’s proposed transition plan for assuming PY duties (as applicable) with the government in order to develop a final transition plan no later than 45 days after contract award.

Effort 2: Program Management and Administration Support

1. The Contractor shall provide the management effort, including the following, to ensure effective cost, schedule, and technical performance of this contract.

1. Contract Modification Management

1. Contract Administration Management

1. Technical Instruction Management

1. Task Management

1. ACRN Accounting Management / 75% Notification Letters

1. Invoice Management

1. Estimating

1. Semi-Annual Self Evaluation Report (CDRL A021)

1. Financial Reporting (CDRL A020):

0. Monthly Financial Reports – Ship / Ship…