Attachment L-1-Bidders Questions 8-25-20.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 15 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Elevator Support Unit (ESU)
- Solicitation number
- N0002419R4303
About this file
This document contains a Request for Proposals issued by the Naval Sea Systems Command for engineering services, maintenance, operator training, technical support, and repair services to modernize and maintain shipboard elevators, cargo handling equipment, and associated systems installed on U.S. Navy aircraft carriers. The solicitation seeks these services through a cost-plus-fixed-fee, indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity contract with a five-year ordering period. The Naval Sea Systems Command will perform work at locations including Norfolk, Newport News, Portsmouth, San Diego, Bremerton, Everett, and Yokosuka, Japan. Offerors must complete the fee table provided and propose all labor categories and hours within the total provided by the government. The contracting office is located at the Washington Navy Yard and the NAICS code for this opportunity is 336611.
View the file
Other files
Show all 32
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sheet1
| Question Number: | Question Source: (RFP, Attachment #, etc.) | Page Number and Paragraph Header from Source: | Question: | Answer: |
| 19 | RFP SECTION L, FACTOR 3 | Pg 129, Resource Capabilites | RFP Section L indicates that Factor 3, Resource Capabilities has a page allocation of 20 pages which includes the Excel file for the Staffing Plan. Since the Staffing Plan could encompass a significant portion of the page allocation for Resource Capabilities and is uploaded as a separate file, would the Government consider excluding the Staffing Plan from the Factor 3 page allocation? | Yes, the Staffing Plan page count will be excluded from the total page count for Factor 3 |
| 20 | RFP SECTION L | PAGE 24 | Section L, Page 24, Amendment 0001, Para 5 states: “Offerors are not allowed to deviate from the labor categories identified (see cross-reference information below), only from the government recommended hours (with explanation as noted above).” However, the answer to Q&A No. 16 refers to Section C and indicates that “The Offeror may propose additional labor categories as deemed fit; however must remain within the total grand number of hours estimated by the Government and provide rationale for the proposed labor categories. No change to the RFP”. |
Question: Is the Offeror allowed to propose additional labor categories as long as the Offeror remains within the grand total number of hours provided by the government in the solicitation? If so, would the government please revise Section L of the RFP accordingly?
| Yes, the offeror may propose additional labor categories as long as the offeror remains within the grand total hours provided by the Government in the RFP. The offeror must also propose to all labor categories that were provided by the Government in the RFP. | ||||
| 21 | RFP SECTION B | PAGE 9 | Section B Page 9 B-216-H006 FEE TABLE (NAVSEA) (MAR 2019) ; Would the Government please confirm that offerors are required to complete this Fee table B-216 as part of their Cost Proposal submission and would apply to CLIN 0001? | The fee table is to be applied to delivery orders. |
| 22 | RFP SECTION B | PAGE 11 | Section B Page 11 states “B-232-H003 PAYMENTS OF FEE (S) (COMPLETION) (NAVSEA) (OCT 2018) applicable to CLIN 0002 CPFF efforts”. Would the Government please confirm the fixed fee % rate offerors to identify is not applicable to the Labor CLIN 0001? | Yes, CLIN 0001 is Level of Effort and a proposed fixed fee is required. |
&"Times New Roman,Regular"&10ELEVATOR SUPPORT UNIT (ESU)
| SOLICITATION NO. N00024-19-R-4303 | &"Times New Roman,Regular"&10Bidder's Question Submittal Form |
| &"Times New Roman,Regular"&10Attachment L-1 |
&"Times New Roman,Regular"&10 28 May 20 Source Selection Information- See FAR 2.101 and 3.104 &"Times New Roman,Regular"&10&P of &N
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .