Attachment L-2 RIS_Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ).docx

DOCX document 32 KB Posted

Attached to
Elevator Support Unit (ESU)
Solicitation number
N0002419R4303
Issued by

About this file

This document contains a past performance questionnaire for offerors responding to solicitation number N00024-19-R-4303 issued by the Naval Sea Systems Command. The solicitation seeks engineering services, maintenance, operator training, technical and repair support for the modernization and repair of shipboard elevators, cargo handling equipment, and associated systems installed on U.S. Navy aircraft carriers. The work will be performed onboard vessels located in Norfolk, VA; Newport News, VA; Portsmouth, VA; San Diego, CA; Bremerton, WA; Everett, WA; and Yokosuka, Japan. The requirement is solicited as a full-and-open, cost-plus-fixed-fee, indefinite delivery/indefinite quantity contract with a ordering period of five years. The NAICS code is 336611 for ship building and repairing. Offerors must submit completed past performance questionnaires from references by July 22, 2020 to the point of contact listed.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Attachment L-1-Bidders Questions 8-25-20.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
N0002419R4303 Amendment 0001.pdf PDF
Attachment L-1-Bidders Questions 8-12-2020.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment L-1 - Bidders Questions 7-31-2020.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Attachment L-1-Bidders Questions 7-22-2020.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
N00024-19-R-4303 ESU REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL.pdf PDF
J-7 FY20 CHG-1 NWRMC LOCAL STANDARD ITEM 099-06NW.pdf PDF
J-15 042-006 General Occupational Safety Health and Environment (OSHE) Requirements for Work Within Norfolk Naval Shipyard- accomplish (PCP.pdf PDF
J-22 Attachment - Key Personnel List.pdf PDF
Attachment L-3 Cost Proposal Format.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
J-20 Contractor Badging and Access Requirements Solicitation (HL).pdf PDF
J-14 042-005 NNSY Work Authorization Form(WAF) Requirements.pdf PDF
J-5 FY20 CHG-1 NWRMC LOCAL STANDARD ITEM 099-04NW.pdf PDF
J-4 FY20 CHG-1 NWRMC LOCAL STANDARD ITEM 099-03NW.pdf PDF
Exhibit A_ ESU CDRLs 2019_5.22 v2 signed.pdf PDF
J-6 FY20 CHG-1 NWRMC LOCAL STANDARD ITEM 099-05NW.pdf PDF
J-21 DDForm254 for N00024-19-R-4303 - Signed.pdf PDF
J-8 FY20 CHG-1 NWRMC LOCAL STANDARD ITEM 099-07NW.pdf PDF
J-19 077-001 Hazardous Waste Produced on Naval Vessels- control.pdf PDF
J-3 FY20 CHG-1 NWRMC LOCAL STANDARD ITEM 099-02NW.pdf PDF
J-10 FY20 CHG-1 NWRMC LOCAL STANDARD ITEM 099-09NW.pdf PDF
J-13 FY20 CHG-1 NWRMC LOCAL STANDARD ITEM 099-12NW.pdf PDF
J-17 042-010 Nuclear Powered Ships-Nuclear Support Ships- special requirements.pdf PDF
J-9 FY20 CHG-1 NWRMC LOCAL STANDARD ITEM 099-08NW.pdf PDF
Attachment L-1- Bidders Question Submittal Form.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
J-16 042-007 Security Requirements for Work Within Norfolk Naval Shipyard- accomplish.pdf PDF
J-1 Task Action Memorandum (TAM).pdf PDF
Section J Exhibit B DD FORM 1423 GLOSSARY.doc DOC document
J-18 042-037 General Requirements for Work Within Naval Station Norfolk- accomplish.pdf PDF
J-12 FY20 CHG-1 NWRMC LOCAL STANDARD ITEM 099-11NW.pdf PDF
J-11 FY20 CHG-1 NWRMC LOCAL STANDARD ITEM 099-10NW.pdf PDF
J-2 FY20 CHG-1 NWRMC LOCAL STANDARD ITEM 099-01NW.pdf PDF
Show all 32

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

ELEVATOR SUPPORT UNIT (ESU)

SOLICITATION NO. N00024-19-R-4303

ATTACHMENT L-2

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

28 May 20 Instructions to Offeror

1.For each reference submitted in your proposal, enter the required information in Section A below.
2.Offerors are responsible for sending copies of the PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE to references. Transmit the entire questionnaire to the identified Points of Contact (POCs) and place one copy of each Section A submission in your proposal submittal.
3.Once completed by the POC, PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRES must be directly transmitted to the Government as described on the following page. Completed PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRES received from the Offerors as not acceptable.

SECTION A: PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE INFORMATION (To be filled out by the Offeror):

NAME OF OFFEROR:

CONTRACT or ORDER NUMBER:

PROJECT TITLE:

PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE START DATE:

PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE END DATE (including options):

CUSTOMER POINT OF CONTACT NAME:

POINT OF CONTACT TITLE:

POINT OF CONTACT TELEPHONE:

POINT OF CONTACT MAILING ADDRESS:

POINT OF CONTACT EMAIL:

TYPE OF CONTRACT: (CPFF, CPIF, FFP, ETC.):

AMOUNT OF CONTRACT ($USD):

DESCRIPTION OF SUPPLIES / SERVICES (Provide reason if terminated):

Instructions to Evaluator The Naval Sea Systems Command is procuring capability and capacity to the Ships’ Force for effective execution of Aircraft Carrier availabilities, repair and continuous maintenance during deployments in support of the Elevator Support Unit (ESU) Program. Evaluation of an Offeror’s past performance is integral to our source selection process. Accordingly, we request your candid assessment of the Offeror’s past performance; please see Section below for the identity of the Offeror and contract of interest.

Once completed, this questionnaire and any appended information becomes Source Selection Sensitive and must be protected from disclosure. Access to this information shall be limited to Government procurement officials.

Please forward the completed questionnaire no later than 22 July 2020 to:

Naval Sea Systems Command, Code 02413
Attn: Ms. Allison Alexander
Telephone No. 202-781-4111
Email Address: allison.e.alexander@navy.mil

Hand-written evaluations are acceptable. All evaluations must relate solely to the Offeror and the contract, task, or order identified in SECTION A.

For each of the criteria listed below, the evaluator must choose One (1) Adjectival Rating by checking the box (double-clicking the box), as applicable. Please provide supporting comments for each rating. Please use your supporting comments to highlight the Offeror’s specific strengths and weaknesses. You may use additional sheets if required. Your ratings and comments should reflect only “contractor liable” performance. You may supplement your knowledge with the knowledge and judgment of others in your organization.

Please enter the requested information in SECTION B for the person primarily responsible for completing the questionnaire, then transmit the completed questionnaire to the point of contact identified above. Thank you for your assistance in this matter.

PLEASE DO NOT PROVIDE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRES TO THE OFFEROR

Section B: PAST PERFORMANCE REFERENCE INFORMATION (To be filled out by the Evaluator):

NAME:

TITLE:

AGENCY/CUSTOMER ORGANIZATION:

PHONE:

E-MAIL

Signature:

1. Overall Contract Outcome Ability to satisfactorily complete all tasks while conforming to customer requirements, standards of good workmanship and safe practices.

RATING
Adjectival Rating
Definition

Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective

Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective

Satisfactory Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory

Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

SUBSTANTIATING COMMENTS:

2. Cost Performance Ability to accurately forecast and control costs throughout all phases of the contract.

RATING
Adjectival Rating
Definition

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

3. Schedule Performance Ability to develop accurate work schedules and adhere to those schedules as well as the ability to adapt to changes in requirements and work schedules.

RATING
Adjectival Rating
Definition

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

4. Technical Performance Ability to overcome technical challenges by applying sound engineering principles, complete required engineering analyses, and develop adequate technical reports and plans.

RATING
Adjectival Rating
Definition

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

5. Customer Relations Degree of customer satisfaction based on the contractor's cooperative behavior, general business-like concern for the interest of the customer, and customer orientated management practices.

RATING
Adjectival Rating
Definition

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

6. Small, Small Disadvantaged, and Women-Owned Business Utilization Compliance with subcontracting plan goals for Small, Small Disadvantaged, and Women-owned business concerns and monetary targets for such concerns.

RATING
Adjectival Rating
Definition

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were highly effective

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective

Performance meets contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor appear or were satisfactory

Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the Contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the Contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .