USS_RUSHMORE_PPI_QA6__Posted_A0007.xlsm

Sheet2 Pre-Proposal Information (PPI) Question and Government Responses #6

For estimating purposes is it the government’s intent to accomplish within 24hrs of docking?

Errata 6 revised Work Item 110-11-001.

Please contact Michael Ravnitzky, michael.ravnitzky@navy.mil, LT Michelle Wogu, michelle.wogu@navy.mil, and Martha Bello, martha.bello@navy.mil for the Errata.

141 243-11-001 Para 3.4 tasked KTR to accomplish removal of the stern tube fairwater, intermediate strut fairwater (Fwd and Aft) propeller strut fairwater, rotating coupling cover and propeller rope guard in accordance with paragraph 243-1.2 of 2.2.

Para 3.24 tasks KTR to install each rotating coupling cover, stern tube fairwater intermediate strut fairwater (Fwd and Aft), propeller strut fairwater, and propeller rope guard.

KTR received ERRATTA 3 for work item 110-11-001 adding paragraphs to remove and reinstall appendages that includes all fairwaters and rope guards.

For estimating purposes is it the Government’s intent to accomplish removal/reinstall in item 243-11-001 and work item 110-11-001 (duplicate)?

Errata 6 revised Work Item 243-11-001.

Please contact Michael Ravnitzky, michael.ravnitzky@navy.mil, LT Michelle Wogu, michelle.wogu@navy.mil, and Martha Bello, martha.bello@navy.mil for the Errata.

142 243-12-001 Para 3.4 tasked KTR to accomplish removal of the stern tube fairwater, intermediate strut fairwater (Fwd and Aft) propeller strut fairwater, rotating coupling cover and propeller rope guard in accordance with paragraph 243-1.2 of 2.2.

Para 3.24 tasks KTR to install each rotating coupling cover, stern tube fairwater intermediate strut fairwater (Fwd and Aft), propeller strut fairwater, and propeller rope guard.

KTR received ERRATTA 3 for work item 110-11-001 adding paragraphs to remove and reinstall appendages that includes all fairwaters and rope guards.

For estimating purposes is it the Government’s intent to accomplish removal/reinstall in item 243-12-001 and work item 110-11-001 (duplicate)?

Errata 6 revised Work Item 243-12-001.

Please contact Michael Ravnitzky, michael.ravnitzky@navy.mil, LT Michelle Wogu, michelle.wogu@navy.mil, and Martha Bello, martha.bello@navy.mil for the Errata.

143 983-90-012 (A3) Para. 1.2 – lists Five (5) Locations of Work 1.2.1 to 1.2.5 only.

Para. 3.1 – lists Location of Equipment as 1.2.7 and 1.2.9.

Location 1.2.7 and 1.2.9 does not exist in the work specs.

Para. 3.2 – Portions of Location of Equipment as 1.2.6 through 1.2.9.

Locations 1.2.6 through 1.2.9 does not exist in the work specs.

Please identify locations 1.2.6 through 1.2.9 in 1.2 This is an error, only locations 1.2.1 through 1.2.5 apply. This has been corrected via errata 6.

Please contact Michael Ravnitzky, michael.ravnitzky@navy.mil, LT Michelle Wogu, michelle.wogu@navy.mil, and Martha Bello, martha.bello@navy.mil for the Errata.

144 Multiple 1. Regarding WI 120-11-003, please advise what preservation paragraphs to quote.

2. Regarding para 3.5 of WI 150-11-003, please advise what is to be preserved. Is the intent for preservation IWO repairs only or the entire Fan Room (02-35-6-Q)?

3. Regarding paras 3.2 & 3.3 of WI 123-12-002, please advise if note 65 of 009-32 applies for JP-5 tanks in that tanks are not required to be painted and that for existing paints, when flaking occurs, SSPC-SP 3 surface preparation shall be accomplished and a light coat of system fluid shall be wiped over the surface prior to closing.

4. Regarding paragraphs 3.2 & 3.2.1 of WI 150-11-011, please advise what is to be preserved. Interior and exterior surfaces of what? Is the location identified in para 1.2 to be preserved in its entirety or only IWO repairs?

5. Regarding WI 264-11-015, please advise what preservation paragraphs is to quote.

6. Regarding WI 300-11-001, please advise what preservation paragraphs is to quote.

7. Regarding WI 633-21-003, please advise what preservation paragraphs is to quote.

8. Regarding WI 110-11-001, please advise how high off the drydock floor the vessel will be raised on the blocks. Are they 6’ high blocks?

9. Please advise if WI 631-31-001 and WI 631-41-001 be accomplished together.

10. Regarding paragraph 3.6 of WI 512-11-007 Errata 3, please advise which space listed in para 1.2 is to be preserved. Para 1.2.3 is a weather deck and the coating system is for interior locations.

11. Regarding para 3.9 of WI 644-11-001 Errata 3, please advise where in para 1.2.5 is to accomplish preservation work and the square footage that will be preserved for the location listed in 1.2.5.

1. WI 120-11-003 was revised in Errata 6 to include to include 009-32 for new and disturbed.

2. WI 150-11-003 was revised in Errata 6 to specify space located in Paragraph 1.2. The scope of para 3.5 applies to the preservation of the fan room in its entirity.

3.Please see previous Government responses for this answer.

4. The overhead of location listed in 1.2 is being replaced, the intereior and exterior of the overhead of the space will need to be preserved.

5. WI264-11-015 was revised in Errata 6 to add a paragraph to include 009-32 for new and disturbed.

6. No preservation required, assessment only

7. No preservation required, assessment only

8. Work item 997-11-002 speaks to block height for the NAVFAC graving dock.

9. It is the contractors responsibility to integrate all work.

10. This is an error. WI 512-11-007 was revised in Errata 6. Para 3.6 applies to 1.2.1 and 1.2.2. A paragaph will be added for 009-32 for new and disturbed for space located in 1.2.3.

11. WI 644-11-001 was revised in Errata 6. Para 3.9 only applies to locations listed in 1.2.1 through 1.2.4.

Please contact Michael Ravnitzky, michael.ravnitzky@navy.mil, LT Michelle Wogu, michelle.wogu@navy.mil, and Martha Bello, martha.bello@navy.mil for the Errata.

145 512-11-006 Item 512-11-006:

1. Para # 3.2, Are the vent systems only the fans & coamings, or is there more required?

2. Para # 3.4, what ref does vent duct 1.2.3 mean, the weather deck hood? 1. Para 3.2 is to remove the ventilation ducting systems S1-80-2 and S1-78-2 identified in 1.3.

2. No fans will be overhauled in this work item, the intent is to remove and replace the ventilation in its entirity from the weatherdecks (1.2.3), including the "hood" on the weatherdeck, through the spaces listed in 1.2.1 and 1.2.2.

1 EA REGULATING VALVE PIN, ROLLS ROYCE P/N 112156016 APL: L834010086, 5315-01-174-4120 – 400 days.

This was added as GFM via Errata 6.

Please contact Michael Ravnitzky, michael.ravnitzky@navy.mil, LT Michelle Wogu, michelle.wogu@navy.mil, and Martha Bello, martha.bello@navy.mil for the Errata.

148 593-11-002 Item 593-11-002 (Errata 4), Paragraph 3.6.1 states “Accomplish the requirements to replace an additional 250 linear feet of deteriorated piping located in 1.2.3 as directed by the SUPERVISOR.”

Contractor unable to price material without the following information;

Description (example: Flange, 90 degree Short Radius, 90 deg Long Radios, 45 deg, Sleeve, Pipe etc ), Qty (how many of each), Sizes (example: 2”, 3”, 1”etc), Length (example: 20ft, 10ft etc), Material type (example: 90/10, 70/30, CUNI, Alum, Bronze, etc) PSI requirements (example: 200psi, 2,000psi etc) This information is required for all piping and associated fitting that are being replaced.

Since the ship is currently not available for ship check, contractor requires the information listed above.

Please provide. Shipchecks are available.

Please contact Michael Ravnitzky, michael.ravnitzky@navy.mil, LT Michelle Wogu, michelle.wogu@navy.mil, and Martha Bello, martha.bello@navy.mil to schedule a ship check.

149 593-11-002 Item 528-11-008:

1. PARA 3.6.1 directs the KTR to replace an additional 250 linear feet of deteriorated piping located in 1.2.3 (CHT Pump RM). KTR notes PARA 3.6.1 does not specify the size of pipe to replace. Unless otherwise directed, for estimating purposes KTR will bid to replace 250 linear feet of 4” 70/30 copper/nickel pipe.

2. KTR further notes the material identified in PARA 1.3.4, “Quantity (25 FT), Waste Drain Piping, 12 Foot of 2 Inch Diameter Piping and 13 Foot of 4 Inch Diameter Piping, including Elbows and Deck Drain Sockets” is not covered in the requirements portion of specification, in addition PARA 1.3.4 does not identify the quantity of elbows or type of deck drain sockets to replace. Will the government by providing quantities and sizes by amendment? Shipchecks are available.

Please contact Michael Ravnitzky, michael.ravnitzky@navy.mil, LT Michelle Wogu, michelle.wogu@navy.mil, and Martha Bello, martha.bello@navy.mil to schedule a ship check.

150 474-11-001 (E2 Item 474-11-001 (E2) “MK-137 Mod 4 Super Rapid Bloom Off board Chaff (SRBOC) Launcher Foundation and Stuffing Tube; replace” Amendment 0002, Errata 02 added the following new references to the specification, but the new reference material was not provided.

2.4 184-6517931, FDNS INCID to SRBOC Instl (E2)

2.6 184-8336612, FDN MODS MK53 DECOY LAUNCHING SYSTEM NULKA (E2)

2.7 184-8336613, STRL MODS MK53 DECOY LAUNCHING SYSTEM NULKA (E2)

2.9 NSWC/LOU 613 Rev A, SURVINST LAUNCHER SURVEYING INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE MK53 DECOY LAUNCHING SYSTEM (E2)

2.10 NSWC/L 613, BORESIGHT MK53 DECOY LAUNCHING SYSTEM BORESIGHT INSTRUCTIONS (E2)

2.11 7244886, PLATE, INSTALLATION SURVEY AND DRILLING (E2)

Question:

1) The six references listed above are missing, please provide. For references please review SI 009-01.

151 042-11-001 (E5) Item 042-11-001 E5 Please provide the listed missing references from Errata 5:

2.2 DHA, Job Aid (E5)

2.3 BHJ, Job Aid (E5)

2.6 TM-M05404, High Pressure Air System Drying Procedure (E5)

2.8 HP Air System, Inspection Results (E5)

2.9 SCBA Air System, Inspection Results (E5)

2.10 PCP Template, HP Air System Hot Water Flush (For Particulate Removal-Critical/General Application) (E5)

2.2 DHA, Job Aid

2.3 BHJ, Job Aid

in 1.3 and located in 1.2, from the flange but not to include valve (VS- V-02-32-1), downstream to the 2 inch coupling and not to include the 2 inch tee, using 2.2 through 2.6 for guidance.”

References 2.2. – 2.5 do not refer to space listed in Para 1.2.1. Passage (02-29-1-L) and the ship is currently not in port for ship check.

Drawing 561‐90‐001 835‐8620598 Not Provided; Possible TYPO? 835‐8620958 Instructions 474‐11‐001E2 Ref. 2.9 NSWC/LOU 613‐A Not Provided X Instructions 474‐11‐001E2 Ref. 2.10 NSWC/L 613 Not Provided X Drawing 643‐11‐001E1 643‐8565858‐A Not Provided; ONLY Rev B IS AVAILABLE IN LL Drawing 643‐11‐002 634‐8565858‐B Typo Error; Correct SWBS no. s/b 643 Drawing 651‐11‐005E2 321‐8577325 Not Provided Drawing 980‐90‐006E1 184‐8620899‐A Not Provided MRC 233‐10‐004A2 MIP 2331 MRC 86 H3NM N Not Provided UNKNOWN 997‐11‐002A2 R9‐2003‐0265 Not Provided UNKNOWN 997‐11‐002A2 R9‐2013‐0064 Not Provided UNKNOWN 997‐11‐002A2 Naval Base San Diego Graving Dock Use Agreement Not Provided Tech Manual 584‐21‐002A3 S9584‐AM‐MMA‐010 Rev2 Only Revsion 4 is Available and it's the Newest UNKNOWN 042‐11‐001E5 DHA Job Aid Not Provided UNKNOWN 042‐11‐001E5 BHJ Job Aid Not Provided Test Memo 505‐11‐001E5 TM‐M05404 Not Provided UNKNOWN 505‐11‐001E5 Ref. 2.8 HP Air System, Inspection Results Not Provided UNKNOWN 505‐11‐001E5 Ref. 2.9 SCBA Air System, Inspection Results Not Provided PCP 505‐11‐001E5 Ref. 2.10 PCP Template, HP Air System Not Provided

2. Paragraph 3.2 is a hold-over requirement from MSMO contracts not applicable to this FFP contract. Recommend deleting this requirement.

Paragraph 3.7.1 states, “Remove existing and install new each hinge pin, grease fitting, hinge pad bushing and hinge blade bushing in accordance with 2.5.”

Paragraph 3.12 states, “Remove existing and install new stern gate gasket, using new hinge pins, grease fittings, and bushings fabricated in 3.6.1, using 2.2, 2.3, 2.5 and 2.9 for guidance.”

Paragraph 3.12.1 states, “Lubricate the hinge pins using existing lubricating system.”

Paragraph 3.12.2 states, “Adjust each dogging mechanism to ensure 100 percent contact with gasket to knife edge.”

Contractor notes that paragraphs 3.12.1 and 3.12.2 are out of sequence and that paragraph 3.12 is restating work completed in paragraph 3.7.1 and adding new stern gate rubber gasket work scope with incomplete guidance. The contractor recommends that:

Paragraph 3.12 be revised to state, “Remove existing and install new each stern gate rubber gasket, including each component gasket retainer and entire gasket mounting channel from each area in 1.3.1, using 2.2 for guidance and material.”

Paragraph 3.12.1 be re-sequenced to 3.7.1.1.

Paragraph 3.12.2 be re-sequenced to 3.7.1.2.

Question:

1) Will the specification be revised to implement the contractor’s recommendations?

Work Item 584-21-002 was revised in Errata 6 to remove the double coverage from para 3.12. The Contractor is authorized by NAVSEA SI's to work paragraphs out of sequence as they see fit.

Please contact Michael Ravnitzky, michael.ravnitzky@navy.mil, LT Michelle Wogu, michelle.wogu@navy.mil, and Martha Bello, martha.bello@navy.mil.

159 584-21-002(A3) Contractor recommends that the following revisions be made to correctly reference the directed work scope:

1) Revise paragraph 3.4.1 to state, “Submit one legible copy, in hard copy or electronic media, of a report listing results of the requirements of 3.4 to the SUPERVISOR.”

2) Revise paragraph 3.5 to state, “Vee-out and weld total of 10 square feet of deteriorated material and damaged welds found defective in 3.4.1, as designated by the SUPERVISOR, using 2.2 for guidance and material requirements.”

3) Revise paragraph 3.7 to state, “Accomplish repairs as reported in 3.1.1 and 3.4.1 and as designated by the SUPERVISOR; including replacement of hinge pins, bushings and line bore of hinge and blade pads using 2.2, 2.3 and 2.5 for guidance.”

4) Revise paragraph 3.13.1 to state, “Submit one legible copy, in hard copy or electronic media, of a report listing results of the requirements of 3.13 to the SUPERVISOR.”

5) Revise paragraph 3.14.2 to state, “Submit one legible copy, in hard copy or electronic media, a report listing results of the requirements of 3.14 and 3.14.1 to the SUPERVISOR.”

As written the work scope identified in paragraph 3.5 is unclear, is the intent to:

1) Vee-out and weld a total of 10 linear feet of damaged welds, Clad Weld 10 square feet of deteriorated material, or some combination of the two?

2) Will paragraph 3.5 be revised to clarify the customers intended repairs?

All changes have been incorperated in errata 6.

Please contact Michael Ravnitzky, michael.ravnitzky@navy.mil, LT Michelle Wogu, michelle.wogu@navy.mil, and Martha Bello, martha.bello@navy.mil.

160 572-11-001(E4) Work Item 572-11-001 (E4) “Dumbwaiter 600 Pound Capacity; repair and test” Paragraph 3.5 states, “Receive hoist drive motor of equipment listed in 1.3 provided as GFM, using Appendix A and paragraphs 6-6 of 2.2 for guidance.”

Paragraph 3.5.2 states, “Assemble the disc brake (Model Number 1-087-642-00-35lb-ft) to the motor using paragraph 6-3.2, Appendix A Page A-15 of 2.2 and 2.9 for guidance and material requirements.”

Paragraph 3.5.2.1 states, “Fit and install new the following parts provided as GFM listed in 5.1.”

Paragraph 3.10 states, “Assemble, fit and install new the following part provided as GFM listed in 5.1 for dumbwaiter assembly in accordance with 2.2:”

Contractors review of the specification and the material identified in paragraph 5.1 notes that:

There is NO material identified in paragraph 5.1 as Required for Paragraph No. 3.5, but paragraph 3.5 states that the hoist drive motor will be provided as GFM.

Question:

1) Contractor needs to clarify that the hoist drive motor identified in paragraph 3.5 will be provided as GFM?

2) Will the GFM list of paragraph 5.1 be updated to correctly identify all provided GFM?

Work Item 572-11-001 was revised via Errata 4 to address this.

Please contact Michael Ravnitzky, michael.ravnitzky@navy.mil, LT Michelle Wogu, michelle.wogu@navy.mil, and Martha Bello, martha.bello@navy.mil.

Sheet3