USS_RUSHMORE_PPI_QA1.xlsm

Sheet1

- Electricity

- Potable and Non-Potable Water

- Sewage / Effluent

- Oily Waste

2.10: 331-8565860 Rev B, Habitability Improvement LSD 47 Electrical CPO, STNCO, Crew & Troop Living Spaces Mod;

2.22 510-8565862 Rev B, Habitability Improvement LSD 47 Ventilation CPO, STNCO, Crew & Troop Sanitary Spaces Mod.

2.23 331-8565864 Rev B, Habitability Improvement LSD 47 Electrical CPO, STNCO, Crew & Troop Sanitary Spaces Mod.

2.24 528-8565863 Rev B, Habitability Improvement LSD 47 Piping CPO, STNCO, Crew & Troop Sanitary Spaces Mod.

Offerors must provide the following to demonstrate eligibility:

A letter signed by the Principal identifying and confirming ownership or committed access (in the form of a letter signed by the subcontractor identifying and confirming committed access) to a pier capable of berthing the USS RUSHMORE (LSD 47) FY19 DSRA and a dry-dock capable of docking the USS RUSHMORE (LSD 47) at time of contract award. Evidence must be provided to prove the dry-dock will remain certified throughout the entire proposed use of the dry-dock in performance of this contract.

1. Does an offeror have to use the graving dock located at Naval Station San Diego for the dry-docking portion of the availability? Or, can an offeror submit a proposal using a privately owned dry-dock for the dry-docking portion of the availability? Above “Government Provided Dock Differential” guidance suggests that an offeror has discretion regarding location of dry-dock.

2. If an offeror is proposing to use the graving dock located at Naval Station San Diego for the dry-docking portion of the availability, what documentation is required to confirm ownership or committed access to a dry-dock capable of docking the USS RUSHMORE (LSD 47) at time of contract award? 1. Offerors proposing to complete the Availability within the San Diego, CA homeport area must propose to use the graving dock located at Naval Station San Diego for the dry-docking portion of the availability. Offerors proposing to complete the Availability outside the San Diego, CA homeport area may propose to use a privately owned dry-dock for the dry-docking portion of the availability.

2. Offerors proposing to use the graving dock located at Naval Station San Diego must only affirmatively state this intention in their letter signed by the Principal and within Eligibility Criteria Data Sheet (Attachment S-5).

Please contact Michael Ravnitzky, michael.ravnitzky@navy.mil, LT Michelle Wogu, michelle.wogu@navy.mil, and Martha Bello, martha.bello@navy.mil to request the Errata.

Please contact Michael Ravnitzky, michael.ravnitzky@navy.mil, LT Michelle Wogu, michelle.wogu@navy.mil, and Martha Bello, martha.bello@navy.mil to request the

Please contact Michael Ravnitzky, michael.ravnitzky@navy.mil, LT Michelle Wogu, michelle.wogu@navy.mil, and Martha Bello, martha.bello@navy.mil to request the Errata.

14 512-11-005 Item 512-11-005 Paragraph 3.1.2 states, “New flexible connection material shall be CRES, ASTM-A240, type 316 in lieu of galvanized steel.”

But Ref.2.3 (DWG.510-6101762) describes VD-07 flex connection for A020 fan as CL Insulation rubber with 2 steel rings.

Is paragraph 3.1.2 referring to the steel rings to be replaced by CRES material?

Please advise.

Paragraph 3.2 states “Accomplish the requirements of 2.2. – 2.19, using material provided in 5.1 and 2.20 through 2.28 for guidance.

Please provide the following ref(s):

Ref 2.7. 321-8622250, SCD 10762 LSD47 PWR SYS SIGNAL SHELTER RMVL Ref 2.13. 321-8686153, SCD 10762 LSD47 HVAC MOD SIGNAL SHELTER RMVL Both drawings were included on the reference CD.

Please contact Michael Ravnitzky, michael.ravnitzky@navy.mil, LT Michelle Wogu, michelle.wogu@navy.mil, and Martha Bello, martha.bello@navy.mil to request the references.

16 150-90-001 583-8506661, 321-6101303, 432-6101470 Item 150-90-001 Paragraph 3.2 states “Accomplish the requirements of 2.2. – 2.35, using material provided in 5.1 and 5.2 and 2.36. – 2.58 for guidance.

Add’l Ref(s) listed under 2.19 required to accomplish repairs.

Please provide the following ref(s):

A) 583-8506661 Rev (-) Upper Boat Cradle Removal FR 67 – 72, 01 LVL (P) B) 321-6101303 Rev F, Pwr Deck Plan 01 LVL D) 432-6101470 Rev C, Sound Pwr Tel Sys – All Ckts Cabling Diagram Item B was included on the reference CD.

Please contact Michael Ravnitzky, michael.ravnitzky@navy.mil, LT Michelle Wogu, michelle.wogu@navy.mil, and Martha Bello, martha.bello@navy.mil to request the other references.

17 150-90-001 Various Please provide the following missing references.

Drawing - 150-11-005 - 612-6517711 Drawing - 150-11-005 - 158-6517936 Drawing - 150-90-001 - 583-6743689-B

LAR - 233-12-007 - LAR REPAIR/LSD45/SW16053

UIPI - 243-11-001, 243-12-001 - 6111-451

Drawing - 561-90-001 - 835-8620598 PPI - 633-21-002 - 63301-001H Rev03 Drawing -643-11-002 - 634-8565858-B Drawing - 643-11-002 - 331-8565860-B Drawing - 643-11-002, 644-11-001 - 510-8565865-B Drawing - 644-11-001 - 644-8565861-B Drawing - 644-11-001 - 510-8565862-B Drawing - 644-11-001 - 331-8565864-B Drawing - 644-11-001 - 528-8565863-B

Paragraph 3.1.1 states, “Remove existing and install new a total of 1,500 square feet of deck plate (3/16 inch thick, ASTM-A36), and all deck edge coaming, using 2.2 through 2.5 for guidance.”

Contractor has reviewed the specification and all identified references 2.1 thru 2.10 and requires further clarification. Paragraph 3.1.1 identifies plate thickness and type of material as 3/16 inch thick ASTM-A36, yet references 2.2 thru 2.5 show the flight deck plating as 7/16” and 3/8” thick HSLA plate. The deck edge coaming which is directed to be replaced in its entirety is not identified by a part number, view, material type, thickness or quantity. Additionally, there are a significant number of flight deck tie downs within the location of work which may be affected and are not addressed.

1) To accomplish the requirements of paragraph 3.1.1, the contractor requires the following additional information:

a) Of the 1,500 square feet of deck plate to be replaced, what is the plate thickness and type of material?

b) Concerning the replacement of all deck edge coaming, what is the plate thickness, type of material, and quantity to be replaced?

c) Concerning flight deck tie downs, how many will be affected, will they require replaced or be reused, and what additional requirements will the customer invoke?

2) Will an Errata be issued to revise the specification with the requested information? Please note that the half decks are not the flight deck. The half decks are the decks between the flight deck and the 1st deck (overhead of the spaces located on the 1st deck, port and starboard side). Material of both the half decks and coaming are 3/16 ASTM-A36.

19 311-22-010 Work Item 311-22-010 “Number 2 Ship's Service Diesel Generator (SSDG) Cylinder Liner and Piston Ring; replace (Option Item)” Paragraph 1.1 of the specification identifies this work item as an (Option Item).

J-4 USS Rushmore Pricing Workbook, Work Item Index (CLIN) tab, Work Item 311-22-010 “Number 2 Ship's Service Diesel Generator (SSDG) Cylinder Liner and Piston Ring; replace (Option Item)” The Base/Option column of the J-4 lists this item with a CLIN of 0028 as a BASE item.

Contractor suspects that work item 311-22-010 is an (Option Item) as identified in the work items titles of the Attachment J-1 Specification Package No. TPPC-LSD47-SWRMC19-CN01 and Attachment J-4 Pricing Workbook, but that the Base/Option column of the J-4 needs to be revised to OPTION.

1) Is work item 311-22-010 an (Option Item)?

2) Will attachment J-4 Pricing Workbook, Work Item Index (CLIN) tab, Base/Option column be revised to identify work item 311-22-010 as an OPTION? Attachment J-4 has been revised to make Work Item 311-22-010 an OPTION.

20 N/A Solicitation Attachment J-4 J-4 USS Rushmore Pricing Workbook, Labor & Material Rates tab Contractor has reviewed the workbook content and there appears to a formula error on the Labor & Material Rates tab. The “Proposed Labor & Material Rate Price”, Cell E375 is missing cell E215 in the formula for calculating the total price of the AGR CLINs.

Pages 1 through 3 (index) of the J-1 attachment are not consistent with the guidance given in section C. The J-1 attachment (Index) only lists up to FY19 CH-3 for CAT I Standard Items and up to FY19 CH-3 for CAT II Standard Items. Additionally the individual work items in J-1 call out FY19 Standard Items (no Change listed).

This causes confusion when dealing with 009-32 Requirements (as one example). The requirements may have significant price differences based on the Change that is being used.

Please provide clarification as to what Standard Items including Changes (for CAT I and CAT II) are applicable to each item of the J-1. Attachment J-1 has been revised to align with, “Category I NAVSEA FY19 Standard Items through CHG 4 identified under Attachment J-1 are applicable to all items without further reference. Category II NAVSEA FY19 Standard Items through CHG 2 are applicable when invoked and/or referenced in individual work items specified in Attachment J-1.”

Please contact Michael Ravnitzky, michael.ravnitzky@navy.mil, LT Michelle Wogu, michelle.wogu@navy.mil, and Martha Bello, martha.bello@navy.mil to request the Attachment.

22 992-21-003 NAVBASESANDIEGOINST 5450.8Q Item 992-21-003 Defueling and Refueling Accomplish Naval Base San Diego Instruction - NAVBASESANDIEGOINST 5450.8Q dated 27 April provides an outline of responsibilities for Naval Bases San Diego including defueling and refueling, stating the following:

1. Par 283(a); when in port fueling is required, the Defense Fuel Support Point (DFSP) Point Loma should be used. DFM transfers by YON barge will be conducted for the following:

(a) Defueling prior to major maintenance availability

(b) Refueling prior to completion of major maintenance availability.

2. The fuel depot in San Diego does not allow contractor tugs to enter or tow the fuel barges.

Please advise. This Work Item has been revised in Errata 2. to address Defueling only, as well as state its for out of port offerors.

Please contact Michael Ravnitzky, michael.ravnitzky@navy.mil, LT Michelle Wogu, michelle.wogu@navy.mil, and Martha Bello, martha.bello@navy.mil to request the Errata.

Please contact Michael Ravnitzky, michael.ravnitzky@navy.mil, LT Michelle Wogu, michelle.wogu@navy.mil, and Martha Bello, martha.bello@navy.mil to request the Errata.

24 437-21-001 Work Item 437-21-001 “Radar Tank Level Indicating (TLI) System; repair” Paragraph 1.3.1 identifies, “Quantity (One EA), Indicator, Radar Tank Level, MFR: The Ohmart Corp., MFR ID: VE202309, APL 38A040026” Paragraph 4.1 states, “Known Source for Radar TLI: Naval Automation Group (NAG) LLC, 2511 Walmer Ave, Suite B, Norfolk, VA 23513-2604, Phone: (757) 852-3998, Fax: (757) 852-9007” In accordance with NAG, the known source vendor provided in paragraph 4.1, the assembly identified paragraph 1.3.1 is obsolete. NAG states that there is a replacement for the obsolete machinery, but they will need additional information in order to provide a quote.

Please provide sufficient information for NAG to ascertain the correct replacement TLI part number and manufacturer or provide the new TLI as GFM. This work item has been revised in Errata 2.

Please contact Michael Ravnitzky, michael.ravnitzky@navy.mil, LT Michelle Wogu, michelle.wogu@navy.mil, and Martha Bello, martha.bello@navy.mil to request the Errata.

&P of &N

Sheet2

Sheet3 image1.jpeg image2.png