USS_RUSHMORE_PPI_QA3_Posted_A0003.xlsm
XLSM spreadsheet 15 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- N00024-18-R-4410
About this file
Q&A Number 3
View the file
Other files
Show all 37
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sheet2 Pre-Proposal Information (PPI) Question and Government Responses #3
| Solicitation #: | |||
| TPPC | TPPC-LSD47-SWRMC19-CN01 | Michael Ravnitzky & LT Michelle Wogu, Contract Specialists, michael.ravnitzky@navy.mil & michelle.wogu@navy.mil | |
| Martha Bello, Contracting Officer, martha.bello@navy.mil | |||
| The following are answers to questions received from potential offerors. The answers provide clarification only and DO NOT constitute an amendment to the solicitation. |
| Q # | Work Item No. | Document Number/ | ||
| Title | Question | Government Response | ||
| 55 | 631-41-001 | Work Item 631-41-001 “Freeboard; preserve” |
Paragraph 3.2.6 states, “Remove and replace 600 square feet of deteriorated hull plating, 100 square feet of aluminum hull plating, and 20 square feet of HY-80 plating as directed by the SUPERVISOR.”
1) Please provide the plate thickness for the hull plating, the aluminum hull plating, and the HY-80 plating.
| 2) Will an Errata be issued to revise the specification with the requested information? | For bidding purposes, the Offerors shall use the largest thickness found on the reference drawings. | |||
| 56 | N/A | J-1 | Amendment 0001 identified changes made to J-1 Specification Package No. TTPC-DDG86-NWRMC19CN01. |
This appears to be a typo as the USS RUSHMORE is LSD47 not DDG86.
| Please confirm and advise. | Amendment A0001 and A0002 had a typo with regards to the continuation page. The correct J-1 Specification package has been referenced in the continuation page for Amendment A0003. | |
| 57 | J-4 |
1. Ref: RFP, Section B, CLIN 0005 - Description states, “Growth associated with CLIN 0005” but should state, “Growth associated with CLIN 0004” to match Attachment J-4 Rev 2
2. Ref: RFP, Section B, CLIN 0007 - Description states, “Growth associated with CLIN 0007” but should state, “Growth associated with CLIN 0006” to match Attachment J-4 Rev 2
3. Ref: RFP, Section B, CLIN 0021 isn’t listed in Attachment J-4 Rev 2
4. Ref RFP Section B, CLIN 0063 – Description states, “Additional Days in Dock req Extension” but should state, “Additional Days Pier Side” to match Attachment J-4 Rev 2
5. Ref RFP Section B, CLIN 0064 – not found on Attachment J-4 Rev 2. Should this be CLIN 0062?
6. Ref RFP Section B, CLIN 0065 – not found on Attachment J-4 Rev 2. Should this be CLIN 0063?
1. CLIN 0005 description was revised in Section B and J-4.
2. CLIN 0007 description was revised in Section B and J-4.
3. There is no CLIN 0021. On Attachment J-4, under the "CLIN" tab, CLIN 0021 has been marked reserved.
4-6. CLIN 00063, 00064 and 00065 can be found in the J-4 Attachment under Tab "Daily Extension Rates" 58 J-4 The Government response to Q#23 states that Work Item 992-11-005 is for Out of Port Offerors. Attachment J-4, Rev 2 doesn’t reflect this. Please clarify. Attachment J-4 has been updated to reflect WI 992-11-005 is to be priced by out of homeport bidders only.
Sheet3
File details come from the government source that posted it.