N00024-18-R-4410_A0003.pdf

N0002418FR93121

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

See Continuation Page.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 6

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 13-Nov-2018

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X N0002418R4410

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

04-Oct-2018

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

13-Nov-2018

CODE

NAVAL SEA SYSTEMS COMMAND (HQ)

1333 ISAAC HULL AVE SE

WASHINGTON NAVY YARD DC 20376-2030

N00024 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

N0002418R4410

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

The following items are applicable to this modification:

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

The purpose of this amendment to N00024-18-R-4410 is to:

Section B:

Revised the descriptions for CLINs 0005 and 0007.

Section J:

Attachment J-1: Specification Package No. TPPC-LSD47-SWRMC19-CN01 is updated to Specification

Package No. TPPC-LSD47-SWRMC19-CN01 (Errata 1, 2 and 3 and Addendum 1, 2,3,4) o Note: Addendum 3 adds Work Item 584-21-002, which will replace WI 584-11-001. A forthcoming Errata will incorporate the deletion of WI 584-11-001.

Attachment J-4:

o Revised WI 992-11-005 to be priced by out of homeport bidders only o Added Work Items 584-21-002, 993-31-002 and 980-90-012

Section M:

Revised Factor 2 language

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION B - SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES

CLIN 0005

The CLIN extended description has changed from:

Growth associated with CLIN 0005. See Attachment J-4. See Notes A, B, D and F.

To:

Growth associated with CLIN 0004. See Attachment J-4. See Notes A, B, D and F.

CLIN 0007

The CLIN extended description has changed from:

Growth associated with CLIN 0007. See Attachment J-4. See Notes A, B, D and F.

To:

Growth associated with CLIN 0006. See Attachment J-4. See Notes A, B, D and F.

SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD

The following have been modified:

Section M - Evaluation Factors for Award

1.0 GENERAL

The Government intends to award a single Fixed-Price contract to the offeror whose proposal represents the Best

Value to the Government after evaluation in accordance with the evaluation factors below. The USS RUSHMORE

(LSD 47) FY19 DSRA shall be competed on a coast-wide basis (West Coast).

Offerors are advised that the Government intends to make award on the basis of initial proposals without conducting discussions with Offerors, but reserves the right to conduct discussions if determined by the Contracting Officer to be necessary (see paragraph (f)(4) of FAR 52.215-1). Therefore, each initial offer should contain the Offeror’s best terms from a price and technical standpoint. Statements and representations made in the Offeror’s proposal may be subject to verification by other sources or through an onsite survey by Navy evaluators.

Offerors are advised that the Government will not evaluate any proposal information not contained within the body of the proposal. Letters of transmittal and/or cover letters that forward the proposal to the Government are not considered part of the body of the proposal.

2.0 BASIS OF AWARD

The Government will make a source selection using the Value Adjusted Total Evaluated Price Tradeoff (VATEP) approach. Award shall be made to the technically acceptable offeror, who is deemed responsible in accordance with

FAR 9.104, who offers the lowest evaluated price proposal.

In order to make a Best Value determination, the Government will evaluate the two (2) non-price factors for acceptability and the offeror’s total evaluated price as described in FAR 15.404. The factors are:

Non- Price Factors

Factor 1: Eligibility Factor

Factor 2: Schedule & Resource Capacity

Price Factor

Factor 3: Price

EVALUATION FACTORS

Factor 1 – Eligibility Factor:

Basis of Evaluation - The objective of this factor is to determine whether the offeror has ownership or committed access to a pier capable of berthing the USS RUSHMORE (LSD 47) at time of contract award.

The Government will assess the offeror’s eligibility using the Eligibility Criteria Data Sheet provided in Attachment

S-5 of the solicitation.

In order to be considered eligible for award, the offeror must:

Have a letter signed by the Principal identifying and confirming ownership or committed access (in the form of a letter signed by the subcontractor identifying and confirming committed access) to a pier capable of berthing the USS RUSHMORE (LSD 47) and a dry-dock capable of docking the USS RUSHMORE

(LSD 47) at time of contract award.

Evidence that offeror holds a Master Ship Repair Agreement or submit documentation for MSRA

Equivalency.

Factor 2 – Schedule & Resource Capacity:

1. The objective of this factor is to evaluate the offeror's response to the Section L requirements for this factor in order to:

Assess the offeror’s understanding of the resources required and the work sequencing necessary to successfully complete the Availability’s highly complex maintenance and modernization requirements.

The Offeror’s response will be evaluated to assess whether the offeror conveys a detailed and complete understanding of how to complete the technical requirements;

and

Assess the offeror’s plan to provide the resources, including personnel and facility resources, necessary to successfully complete the the Availability’s highly complex maintenance and modernization requirements.

The offeror will be evaluated on the completeness and reasonableness of the manpower curves and manpower resource plan and associated narrative. Information provided shall demonstrate a reasonable expectation of successful execution in accordancew with the solicitation requirements.

The offeror will be evaluated on the completeness and reasonableness of the personnel and facility information provided in response to this factor. Information provided shall demonstrate a reasonable expectation of successful execution. The offeror must clearly demonstrate that it has access to the required facilities required to execute the Availability. Additionally, the offeror will be evaluated on its ability to resolve resource issues as a result the award of other outstaning proposals. Information provided shall demonstrate a reasonable expectation of successful execution.

Ratings

The ratings will be based on what is contained or referenced in the proposal, not on information obtained from other sources. Standards have been established to provide the same set of values for all evaluators. The objectives of using these standards are to promote uniformity in evaluation and to aid in the comparison and understanding of the evaluation results. The standards are set as follows:

Factors 1 & 2 –

For Factors 1 & 2, the adjectival rating reflects whether the information submitted in response to Factors 1 & 2 meet or do not meet the minimum requirements through an assessment of the proposal. The evaluation will identify any deficiencies in offeror’s proposals. Adjectival ratings for Factors 1 & 2 are as follows:

Adjectival Ratings for Factors 1 & 2

Rating Description

Acceptable Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Unacceptable Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation.

Factor 3 - Price

The Government will analyze price proposals in accordance with FAR 15.404 using the information contained in

Attachment J-4. Although award will be made based on an offeror’s total evaluated price, a price proposal that is found unreasonable and/or unbalanced may be rejected. The Government will review the offeror’s CLIN and Work

Item prices for the USS RUSHMORE (LSD 47) DSRA to identify any significant disparities that may indicate a lack of understanding of contract requirements.

Total evaluated price shall be calculated by adding:

The price of the basic contract line item numbers (CLIN) (this amount shall match the total price of all work items), The price of all option CLINs, The price of all Growth Reservation CLINS (Base and Option), The evaluated price of the Extension day Rates and Labor Rate and Material Burden Rates

If applicable, the Value Adjusted Trade Off schedule adjustment, If applicable, the value of the inter-port differential (as identified in Section L of this solicitation)

The Growth Reservation CLINs price, Evaluated Extension day price, Labor and Material Burden Rate New Work

Evaluated Price shall be calculated in the following manner:

Growth Reservation CLINs (Base and Option)

1. Multiply the proposed labor rate in Cell B3 by the number of hours associated with the specific Growth

Reservation CLIN in attachment J-4 to yield the total labor price for that CLIN.

2. Multiply the material burden rate proposed by the dollar value of material associated with the specific Growth

Reservation CLIN in attachment J-4 to yield the burdened material price for that CLIN.

3. Attachment J-4 will add the sum of labor hour and material dollar price to find the total price for each Growth

Reservation CLIN.

Evaluated Extension Day Price

1. Multiply the proposed daily rate by the number of days associated with that rate (for each extension type included in attachment J-4) to yield the evaluated price for that daily extension type.

2. Attachment J-4 will add the sum of daily extension price types to find the total price for Evaluated Extension

Days.

Evaluated Labor Rate and Material Burden Rate for New Work Price

1. Multiply the proposed labor rate by the number of hours associated with the specific New Work Labor hours in attachment J-4 to yield the labor price for New Work.

2. Multiply the material burden rate proposed by the dollar value of material dollars associated with New Work in attachment J-4 to yield the burdened material price for New Work.

3. Attachment J-4 will add the sum of labor hour and material dollar price to find the Evaluated Labor and Material

Burden Rate New Work Price

Offerors are advised that the number of Extension days and the number of labor hours and the material dollar value for the Labor and Material Burden New Work Rates are for evaluation purposes only.

Inter-port Differential - The inter-port differential must be included in all offers and is calculated using foreseeable costs for fuel, towing and pilot charges, and travel to the contractor’s facility by applicable Government personnel.

The following chart provides the values to be included in all offerors’ price proposals to determine the offeror’s total evaluated price. Additionally, the Navy has included an Inter-port Differential Reduction for “Days Completed

Early” as proposed in Attachment J-3:

Location*

Differential

Inter-port Differential Reduction for

“Days Completed Early” stated in

Attachment J-3

Portland, OR $5,036,240 -$3,555

San Diego, CA $64,887 -$174

Seattle, WA $5,072,185 -$9,616

*Offeror’s whose location is not listed in the above inter-port differential table shall submit a bidder’s question requesting an inter-port differential be calculated for the location of the offeror’s proposed place of performance for the USS RUSHMORE (LSD 47) FY19 DSRA.

A Government Provided Dock Differential shall be proposed for offerors that are relying on the Government to supply the required dock space. The following chart provides the value to be included in all San Diego, CA based offerors price proposals to determine the offeror’s total evaluated price. Additionally, the Navy has included an

Dock Differential Reduction for “Fewer Dock Days Proposed” as proposed in Attachment J-3. If applicable, include the value for the Government provided dock differential as follows:

Location Differential Differential

Reduction for

“Fewer Dock Days

Proposed” stated in Attachment J-3

San Diego, CA $3,758,340 $17,982

Value Adjusted Total Evaluated Price Tradeoff (VATEP) Schedule Adjustment

The Navy would obtain additional value, in terms of additional Operational Availability, should the USS

RUSHMORE (LSD 47) FY19 DSRA Availability complete early to its no-later-than completion date. Therefore, the

Navy has included a VATEP price adjustment to incorporate this additional value into its price evaluation. The

VATEP schedule adjustment shall be calculated by multiplying “Days Completed Early” value found in Attachment

J-3 by the VATEP schedule adjustment factor, which is -$67,134 per day. Any adjustment will be incorporated into the resultant contract via Attachment J-3.

Subcontracting Plan – The plan will be evaluated in accordance with FAR clause 19.704 and must meet all of the criteria to be considered Acceptable.

(End of Summary of Changes)